Advanced Media Group V Lancaster Film Commission June 9, 2008

Advanced Media Group
Page 1 of 142
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

OF LANCASTER COUNTY
CIVIL DIVISION
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
and
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Plaintiffs
v.
Thursday, November 5, 2015
CASE NO. _________
HOTEL BRUNSWICK
HAMED .
:
and
:
ROGER FITZWATER, JR.,
:
WOODCREST AUDIO
:
and
THE JAMES STREET INVESTMENT DISTRICT
and
:
THE LANCASTER FILM COMMISSION
:
and
:
THE LANCASTER FILM COMMISSION HONORARY BOARD MEMBERS
SENATOR GIBSON ARMSTRONG
:
CHARLES SMITHGALL
:
GLENN ROBINSON
:
LARRY ALEXANDER
:
MICHAEL O'DAY
:
BRAD HEPFER
:
TIMOTHY MARSDEN
:
Defendants
:
TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

AND NOW comes Plaintiff, Stanley J. Caterbone, as pro se, and respectfully avers as follows:
Petitioner, Stanley J. Caterbone, resides at 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA, 17603, is a United States
Citizen and Advanced Media Group is a fictitious name registered in Pennsylvania with its principal place
of business in Pennsylvania. Petitioner files a CIVIL COMPLAINT against the DEFENDANTS named in the
above caption on this 6th day of June 2008 in the Untied States District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania. This complaint is filed under duress.
_________________________
Date: June 16, 2008
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
amgroup01@msn.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
Page 2 of 142
CIVIL COMPLAINT
INTRODUCTION
1. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP have suffered irreparable harm to its reputation and to
its efforts to continue its business operations while as a petitioner in a Chapter 11 Reorganization
Plan filed on May 23, 2005 in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District as case
no. 05-23059.
2. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP were also continuing a decade long investment in
projects located in the Downtown Lancaster Investment District that have been maliciously
sabotaged with ease due to the gross abuse; negligence; and abuse of process of the Lancaster
City Bureau of Police coupled with the false arrests and the malicious prosecutions. Three main
projects include a UPS Shipping and Copy Store (CATERBONE retains an exclusivity agreement with
UPS); Excelsior Place Business Plan; and the Downtown Theater at Hotel Brunswick 1. CATERBONE
and the ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP have been an active advocate and supporter of the Downtown
Lancaster Convention Center and the revitalization of Downtown Lancaster and have demonstrated
a record of support and advocacy through its meeting and communications with major
stakeholders, public officials, and attendance at public meetings.
In November of 2007,
CATERBONE and the Advanced Media Group went public with their Downtown Lancaster
investments and business plans that were culminated over the past 9 years. The Advanced Media
Group also formerly and publicly introduced their Downtown Lancaster Action Plan 2 via handouts,
websites, and blogs; and began meetings and negotiations with major stakeholders, City of
Lancaster Public Officials, Developers, and investors.
3. CATERBONE has formerly applied to be on the Lancaster Convention Center Authority Board of
Directors in 2007 and has petitioned for a seat on the Lancaster County Government Study Group
in 2006.
4. The PLAINTIFF, Stanley J. Caterbone (CATERBONE), alleges that the City of Lancaster and the
Lancaster City Bureau of Police and others colluded to deliberately ignore CATERBONES
complaints, an abuse of process, in an effort to retaliate, subvert, interrupt and deter current and
ongoing litigation and civil complaints against several major businesses and government agencies
with headquarters in the City of Lancaster and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Those would
include the Lancaster General Hospital; High Industries (not Penn Square Partners and the
Lancaster County Convention Center); Fulton Bank and Fulton Financial Corporation; a Wachovia
Bank branch (pending); Lancaster Newspapers; the County of Lancaster; the Lancaster County
Prison; the Hotel Brunswick (pending); James Street Investment District (pending); Aurora Films;
A description and narrative can be seen on the Advanced Media Groups blog Journey of a Whisleblower
at www.
2
The Downtown Lancaster Action Plan can be viewed on the Advanced Media Groups blog Journey of a
Whisleblower at www.
1

Page 3 of 142
Haverstick Films (pending); and the Lancaster City Bureau of Police. The City of Lancaster and the
Lancaster City Bureau of Police are derelict in their duties in forcing CATERBONE to litigate for
duties and services due CATERBONE that are mandated in the bylaws of the City of Lancaster.
5. CATERBONE also alleges that the Lancaster City Bureau of Police were used to retaliate, subvert,
interrupt and deter other litigation and civil complaints against other police departments, namely
the Southern Regional Police Department, the Manheim Township Police Department, the East
Lampeter Police Department, the Millersville Boro Police, the Avalon Police Department and the
Stone Harbor Police Department.
CATERBONE alleges that Southern Regional Police Chief John
Fiorill used is official capacity as President of the Red Rose Chapter of the Fraternal Order of Police
to help accomplish these civil torts.
6. CATERBONE alleges that by ignoring his complaints the Lancaster City Police Bureau of Police gave
the green light, or approval, for others to continue a long and successful period of harassment,
thievery, property damage, computer and electronic hacking, deletion and manipulation of court
related documents, records and evidence, mail fraud, eaves dropping, invasion of privacy, criminal
trespass, and the like. These activities are so intense that they have taken on the characteristics
of a hate crime.
7. CATERBONE alleges that the gross abuse and gross negligence defamed his name and that of his
company, ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, which discredited his reputation in an effort to diminish
credibility in the courts; to thwart any reprimands by oversight agencies; and to disrupt and thwart
any possible business relations and operations of ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP. This has resulted in
direct and immediate financial loss, loss of time, and loss of income.
8. CATERBONE had complained of abuse of process to state and federal law enforcement regarding
the situation, including U.S. Senator Arlen Specters office.
CATERBONE had also visited the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in both Harrisburg and Philadelphia for help and intervention.
9. CATERBONE also had personal meetings with Lancaster City Mayor Rick Gray in Lancaster City Hall
on at least 4 occasions to find a solution to the problems and for help to mediate the problems and
or resolve the conflicts.
The resulting pain and suffering, as well as loss and destruction of
property and financial loss that CATERBONE was undergoing was unprecedented.
10. In November of 2007, CATERBONE and the Advanced Media Group went public with their
Downtown Lancaster investments and business plans that were culminated over the past 9 years.
The Advanced Media Group also formerly and publicly introduced their Downtown Lancaster Action
Plan via handouts, websites, and blogs; and began meetings and negotiations with major
stakeholders, City of Lancaster Public Officials, Developers, and investors.
Page 4 of 142
CAUSES OF ACTION
11. On March 18, 2008 CATERBONE went to the Hotel Brunswick in Downtown Lancaster to continue
take measurements of the Movie Theater for his continued efforts of a business and development
plan.
(The Brunswick Movie Theater, or Eric, had been closed since 1995.
CATERBONE and
Advanced Media Group had an agreement with the Owner of the Brunswick, Hamid Zahedi, to
make a formal proposal and offer for leasing the site. CATERBONE had begun discussions in 2006.)
12. CATERBONE noticed that the United States Department of Justice Office of Trustee was conducting
hearings for Chapter 11 petitioners in the Presidential Room of the Hotel Brunswick 3.
13. CATERBONE thought maybe Dave Adams, the trustee for the United States Department of Justice
Office of Trustee might be conducting the hearings 4.
CATERBONE had gone to the Presidential
Room and had a discussion with the person administering the Bankruptcy Hearings.
14. The following day CATERBONE received a disturbing email from Mr. Barry A. Solodky, Esquire, of
Blakinger, Byler & Thomas, P.C., 28 Penn Square, Lancaster, PA 17603. CATERBONE had known
Mr. Solodky since the 1980s and had even solicited him to review his bankruptcy matters before
the Appllent filed his Chapter 11 case on May 23, 2005. The following email exchanges detail the
incident and the false reports and allegations from a member of Blakinger, Byler & Thomas, P.C.:
CATERBONE had not received ORDERS from his United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 083054 for his appeal of an issue in his Chapter 11 Case No. 05-23059. CATERBONE alleged that the
ORDERS were stolen or never mailed from the clerk of courts.
3
Sometime in February of 2008 by way of computer hacking or misconduct within the staff of the Clerk of
Court of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, CATERBONE was erroneously and maliciously placed on
electronic email distribution with no paper copies for all of his ORDERS for all of his cases, which at that
time numbered four (4), without the knowledge of CATERBONE. After receiving one of the email alerts
and ORDERS CATERBONE personally visited the Clerk of Court for the Third Circuit and was told by staff
that it was just a new courtesy copy. The staff did not notify CATERBONE that his cases would not be
eligible for paper copies of ORDERS. CATERBONE was alleging since February that his ORDERS were
being stolen in the U.S. mails, and only received information in April on the bottom of a copy of a letter
attached to an ORDER for Case No. 3054 that he was switched to electronic email distribution with no
paper copies. This makes no sense since, filing as pro se, CATERBONE is not eligible to file any electronic
documents in any U.S. or Pennsylvania Courts without a Pennsylvania Bar License. On several occasions
since February 2008, CATERBONE was not able to open the Third Circuit electronic ORDERS on the first
attempt, which denied CATERBONE access or knowledge of the Third Circuit ORDERS with no way of
retrieving them again. CATERBONE was not even able to respond or know how the United States Third
Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled or what ORDERS were handed down, which also denied CATERBONE
any chance to follow court mandated responses in a timely fashion. On May 29, 2008 at approximately
9:15 am CATERBONE called Ms. Charlene Ciscaden, case manager for the U.S. Third Circuit of Appeals
that manages CATERBONES cases from his cell phone (717) 669-2163). Ms. Ciscaden stated the
following:
a. 1. Motion for Extension of 07-4475 GRANTED on May 22, 2008
b. Motion for Extension of 07-4474 GRANTED on May 27, 2008
c. The U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals has no electronic email address for me.
d. Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group was never taken off of paper copies for any U.S.
Third Circuit Court of Appeals ORDERS, MOTIONS, or ANY COMMUNICATIONS.
e. All ORDERS, MOTIONS, and COMMUNICATIONS have been sent via 1st Class U.S. Postal
Service.

Page 5 of 142
Subject:
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:18:00 -0400
From: bas@bbt-law.com
To: amgroup01@msn.com
Hi Stan,
Hope this note finds you well.
Yesterday afternoon I had to attend some bankruptcy meetings on behalf of some clients.
While there the Trustee told me about an event which concerned her. She showed me your
card and told me what happened. In fact she said she almost considered calling the police
because of the incident.
I assured her you were not the type of person that would do anything inappropriate. I did
want you to know she is not an employee of the Dept. of Justice or the Bankruptcy Court;
she is a private panel trustee just as I was for 33 years. If for some reason you have issues
with the bankruptcy system she is not a person who should be hassled as she has nothing
to do with your case.
I'm sending this only because I don't want there to be any further incidents which might
cause her concern or the Federal marshals will get involved and I know they can be nasty.
Needless to say I don't want to see anything to you which would cause you any problems.
I am sure I will bump into you soon. Have a nice Easter.
Barry A. Solodky, Esquire
Blakinger, Byler & Thomas, P.C.
28 Penn Square
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 509-7273
14. CATERBONEs Response to Mr. Barry A. Solodkys email:
RE: Meeting wih the Dept of Justice.
From:
Stan Caterbone (amgroup01@msn.com)
Sent:
Sat 3/22/08 8:36 AM
To:
Barry A. Solodky (bas@bbt-law.com)
FBI, Field Office (philadelphia@fbi.gov); Landis, Detective Michael
Cc:
(landism@co.lancaster.pa.us); info@hotelbrunswick.com
Bcc:
March 22, 2008
Re: Meeting With Department of Justice
Barry Solodky,
First, I would have responded earlier, however, your email found it's way into my junk
email.
Secondly, as an officer of the court, you better be careful about spreading lies about me
and fabrications about events that did not happen. By the way, a copy of this will go
directly to the Federal Bureau of Investigation Philadelphia Field Office and Detective
Michael Landis of the Lancaster County District Attorney Office. Who do you think you are
talking to?
Thirdly, here is what transpired. The day before I received an ORDER from the Third Circuit
Court of Appeals, which was purposely postmarked 10 days after the Clerk filed and dated

Page 6 of 142
the Mail to copy to myself. The ORDER was for a no response to a Show Cause ORDER,
which someone had stole from my mail, which I never received. The Third Circuit case was
an appeal from my Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
Now, on Wednesday morning I made plans to go to the Hotel Brunswick and take some
measurements in the Movie Theater, which I am in the middle of a development plan. As
usual, I walked into the lobby on the street level adjacent to the parking garage and saw
the easel with the notice that the "Department of Justice" was holding bankruptcy hearings.
I was told a few years ago earlier in my Chapter 11 that they often hold hearings in
Lancaster, at the Brunswick or at the Hotel on Manheim Pike. As soon as I saw the sign I
figured I would see if Joe Adams, my Trustee from the Philadelphia Office of the
Department of Justice Office of Trustee that handles my case, was here.
So, as I usually do, I went to the office of Kevin, the Hotel Brunswick General Manager to
get the key to the movie theater, as per our agreement with Hamid, the owner of the Hotel
Brunswick. He was not in his office, and the Desk Manager had to page him. I asked him
where the Department of Justice was holding the hearings, and told him I needed to talk to
someone there, while he was trying to locate Kevin, the General Manager. I told him I
would be right back.
I went to the Presidential Room where they were holding meetings. When I arrived,
the Trustee, or what private panel trustee, was conducting a meeting with a Spanish
woman, who had a young girl for a translator. I patiently waited by the wall as you walk in
until the entire interview was over. After the private panel trustee dismissed the woman, I
approached her and asked her if she was from the Department of Justice Office of the
Trustee, and she responded that she was a private panel trustee. I simply told her that I
had a problem with someone obstructing justice with my Third Circuit case and asked her if
Joe Adams was in her office. She said she was not from the Philadelphia Office. I gave her
my card and some woman kept trying to talk and interfere. I just calmly left. I went to
meet Kevin, the General Manager, he opened the movie theater and I spent approximately
1 hour taking measurements of the existing floor plan.
There was no incident to speak of. Any incident was a lie, regardless of the person that
kept interfering with our conversation that was trying to cause problems. It was not me,
you fool.
I would suggest that you provide this email to the person that told you that fabricated lie
and anyone else that you communicate with regarding your so called version of an
"incident". Follow this link and you may read why people like you lie about these incidents.
Now, you have a nice Easter Weekend. And by the way, I am a supporter of Senator
Clinton and I do volunteer my services, just in case you were wondering.
Stan J. Caterbone
15. On April 22, 2008 the Plaintiff, Stan J. Caterbone (CATERBONE) visited the office of the owner of
the Hotel Brunswick, Hamed (HAMED) to discuss the reasons for the delay in delivering the
business plan and development plan for the Downtown Theater at Hotel Brunswick, as promised.
16. Upon entering the office, HAMED claimed to have sent CATERBONE a letter notifying he was no
longer allowed on the premises because CATERBONE allegedly disrupted a meeting.
17. CATERBONE responded by first stating that CATERBONE never received such a letter.
18. CATERBONE then responded that CATERBONE never disrupted a meeting, nor did CATERBONE ever
here of any such incident except the email from Attorney Barry Solodky.

Page 7 of 142
19. CATERBONE put HAMED on notice that CATERBONE would summon authorities and handle the
situation. CATERBONE assumed that the HOTEL BRUNSWICK and HAMED were leaked some of the
preliminary business and development plan from CATERBONES computer and wanted the theater
project for themselves or another party, as with the LANCASTER FILM COMMISSION, and the
JAMES STREET BUSINESS DISTRICT.
20. CATERBONE immediately went to the Office of Lancaster City Mayor Rick Gray to report the
incident.
21. CATERBONE had direct talks and personal meetings with both Pennsylvania Senator Gibson
Armstrong and Pennsylvania House of Representative Michael Sturla regarding obtaining grants for
funding some of the theater project because of the independent film strategy. Both were
optimistic, although the staffer (Mr. Thompson) for AMRSTRONG noted that someone had
approached ARMSTRONG about a movie theater downtown, and immediately put down
CATERBONES efforts and the location and site.
22. CATERBONE had also talks and negotiations with HAMED for the corner storefront of Chestnut and
Queen Streets for the UPS/FEDEX Copy Store.
23. In 2008 CATERBONE had several discussions with Mary Haverstick of Haverstick Films to discuss
the possibility of working together on the Downtown Theater at Hotel Brunswick. CATERBONE had
known Mary Haverstick since the 1980s.
24. Ms. Haverstick was very interested in supporting the project and a future meeting was being
scheduled to begin formal discussions.
25. On --------------- CATERBONE had a meeting with Aurora Films in their office on North Queen
Street in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
26. On ---------------- CATERBONE had a meeting with Mr. Jay Ingram, Executive Director and founder
of the Lancaster Film Commission.
27. On ---------------- CATERBONE signed an agreement with Roger Fitzsimmons, owner and operator
of Woodcrest Audio to work on the project.
28. On --------------- CATERBONE signed an agreement with Jeff Lefevre regarding the development of
the Excelsior Place building on East King Street, in Downtown Lancaster.

CAUSES OF ACTION BY DEFENDANTS
Page 8 of 142
HOTEL BRUNSWICK
HAMED .
ROGER FITZWATER, JR.,
WOODCREST AUDIO
THE JAMES STREET INVESTMENT DISTRICT
THE LANCASTER FILM COMMISSION
THE LANCASTER FILM COMMISSION HONORARY BOARD MEMBERS
SENATOR GIBSON ARMSTRONG
CHARLES SMITHGALL
GLENN ROBINSON
LARRY ALEXANDER
MICHAEL O'DAY
BRAD HEPFER
TIMOTHY MARSDEN
Collusion to Commit Fraud; Libel; Civil Conspiracy; Harasment; Civil Rights Violations; RICO Violations;
Anit-Trust Violations; Theft of Property; Unjust Enrichement; Violations of Intellectual Property Rights.
Damages
Loss of reputation and credit; humiliation; and mental suffering discomfort; injury to health; loss of time;
economic loss due to business and litigation interruption; loss of opportunity; legal fees and punitive
damages.
Plaintiffs seeks jury trial and damages in excess of $100,000.

JURISDICTION
Page 9 of 142
In criminal law, fraud is the crime or offense of deliberately deceiving another in order to damage them
usually, to obtain property or services unjustly. [1] Fraud can be accomplished through the aid of forged
objects. In the criminal law of common law jurisdictions it may be called "theft by deception," "larceny by
trick," "larceny by fraud and deception" or something similar.
Fraud can be committed through many methods, including mail, wire, phone, and the internet (computer
crime and internet fraud).
Fraud, in addition to being a criminal act, is also a type of civil law violation known as a tort. A tort is a
civil wrong for which the law provides a remedy. A civil fraud typically involves the act of intentionally
making a false representation of a material fact, with the intent to deceive, which is reasonably relied
upon by another person to that person's detriment. A "false representation" can take many forms, such
as:
A false statement of fact, known to be false at the time it was made;

A statement of fact with no reasonable basis to make that statement;
A promise of future performance made with an intent, at the time the promise was made, not to
perform as promised;
A statement of opinion based on a false statement of fact;
A statement of opinion that the maker knows to be false; or
An expression of opinion that is false, made by one claiming or implying to have special knowledge
of the subject matter of the opinion. "Special knowledge" in this case means knowledge or
information superior to that possessed by the other party, and to which the other party did not
have equal access.
In law, defamation (also called vilification, slander, and libel) is the communication of a statement
that makes a false claim, expressively stated or implied to be factual, that may harm the reputation of an
individual, business, product, group, government or nation. Slander refers to spoken comments, while
libel refers to any other form of communication such as written words or images. Most jurisdictions allow
legal actions, civil and/or criminal, to deter various kinds of defamation and retaliate against groundless
criticism. Related to defamation is public disclosure of private facts arises where one person reveals
information which is not of public concern, and the release of which would offend a reasonable person. [1]
"Unlike libel or slander, truth is not a defense for invasion of privacy."[2]
False light laws are "intended primarily to protect the plaintiff's mental or emotional well-being."[3] If a
publication of information is false, then a tort of defamation might have occurred. If that communication is
not technically false but is still misleading then a tort of false light might have occurred.[3]
Slander and libel
The common law origins of defamation lie in the torts of slander (harmful statement in a transitory form,
especially speech) and libel[4][5] (harmful statement in a fixed medium, especially writing but also a
picture, sign, or electronic broadcast), each of which gives a common law right of action.
"Defamation" is the general term used internationally, and is used in this article where it is not necessary
to distinguish between "slander" and "libel". Libel and slander both require publication. [6] The fundamental
distinction between libel and slander lies solely in the form in which the defamatory matter is published. If
the offending material is published in some fleeting form, as by spoken words or sounds, sign language,
gestures and the like, then this is slander. If it is published in more durable form, for example in written
words, film, compact disc (CD), DVD, blogging and the like, then it is considered libel.
Criminal defamation
Many nations have criminal penalties for defamation in some situations, and different conditions for
determining whether an offense has occurred. ARTICLE 19, Global Campaign for Free Expression, has

Page 10 of 142
published global maps [2] charting the existence of criminal defamation law across the globe. The law is
used predominantly to defend political leaders or functionaries of the state. In Britain, the Italian anarchist
Errico Malatesta was convicted of criminal libel for denouncing the Italian state agent Ennio Belelli in 1912.
While, in Canada, though the law has been applied on only six occasions in the past century, all of those
cases involve libellants attached to the state (police officers, judges, prison guards). In the most recent
case, Bradley Waugh and Ravin Gill were charged with criminal libel for publicly accusing six prison guards
of the racially motivated murder of a black inmate (http://netk.net.au/Canada/Canada15.asp. In
Zimbabwe, "insulting the President" is, by statute, (Public Order and Security Act 2001) a criminal offense.
Defenses
Even if a statement is derogatory, there are circumstances in which such statements are permissible in
law.
Truth
In many legal systems, adverse public statements about legal citizens presented as fact must be proven
false to be defamatory or slanderous/libel. Proving adverse, public character statements to be true is often
the best defense against a prosecution for libel and/or defamation. Statements of opinion that cannot be
proven true or false will likely need to apply some other kind of defense. The use of the defense of
justification has dangers, however; if the defendant libels the plaintiff and then runs the defense of truth
and fails, he may be said to have aggravated the harm.
Another important aspect of defamation is the difference between fact and opinion. Statements made as
"facts" are frequently actionable defamation. Statements of opinion or pure opinion are not actionable. In
order to win damages in a libel case, the plaintiff must first show that the statements were "statements of
fact or mixed statements of opinion and fact" and second that these statements were false. Conversely, a
typical defense to defamation is that the statements are opinion. One of the major tests to distinguish
whether a statement is fact or opinion is whether the statement can be proved true or false in a court of
law. If the statement can be proved true or false, then, on that basis, the case will be heard by a jury to
determine whether it is true or false. If the statement cannot be proved true or false, the court may
dismiss the libel case without it ever going to a jury to find facts in the case.
In some systems, however, notably the Philippines, truth alone is not a defense. [7] Some U.S. statutes
preserve historical common law exceptions to the defense of truth to libel actions. These exceptions were
for statements "tending to blacken the memory of one who is dead" or "expose the natural defects of one
who is alive." [8]
It is also necessary in these cases to show that there is a well-founded public interest in the specific
information being widely known, and this may be the case even for public figures. Public interest is
generally not "that which the public is interested in," but rather that which is in the interest of the public. [9]
[10]
See also: Substantial truth

Privilege and malice
Privilege provides a complete bar and answer to a defamation suit, though conditions may have to be met
before this protection is granted.
There are two types of privilege in the common law tradition:
"Absolute privilege" has the effect that a statement cannot be sued on as defamatory, even if it
were made maliciously; a typical example is evidence given in court (although this may give rise to
different claims, such as an action for malicious prosecution or perjury) or statements made in a
session of the legislature (known as 'Parliamentary privilege' in Commonwealth countries).

Page 11 of 142
"Qualified privilege" may be available to the journalist as a defense in circumstances where it is
considered important that the facts be known in the public interest; an example would be public
meetings, local government documents, and information relating to public bodies such as the police
and fire departments. Qualified privilege has the same effect as absolute privilege, but does not
protect statements that can be proven to have been made with malicious intent.
Other defenses
Defenses to claims of defamation include:
Truth is an absolute defense in the United States as well as in the common law jurisdictions of
Canada. In some other countries it is also necessary to show a benefit to the public good in having
the information brought to light.
Statements made in a good faith and reasonable belief that they were true are generally
treated the same as true statements; however, the court may inquire into the reasonableness of
the belief. The degree of care expected will vary with the nature of the defendant: an ordinary
person might safely rely on a single newspaper report, while the newspaper would be expected to
carefully check multiple sources.
Privilege is a defense when witness testimony, attorneys' arguments, and judges' decisions,
rulings, and statements made in court, or statements by legislators on the floor of the legislature,
or statements made by a person to their spouse, are the cause for the claim. These statements are
said to be privileged and cannot be cause for a defamation claim.
Opinion is a defense recognized in nearly every jurisdiction. If the allegedly defamatory assertion
is an expression of opinion rather than a statement of fact, defamation claims usually cannot be
brought because opinions are inherently not falsifiable. However, some jurisdictions decline to
recognize any legal distinction between fact and opinion. The United States Supreme Court, in
particular, has ruled that the First Amendment does not require recognition of an opinion privilege.
Fair comment on a matter of public interest, statements made with an honest belief in their
truth on a matter of public interest (official acts) are defenses to a defamation claim, even if such
arguments are logically unsound; if a reasonable person could honestly entertain such an opinion,
the statement is protected.
Consent is an uncommon defense and makes the claim that the claimant consented to the
dissemination of the statement.
Innocent dissemination is a defense available when a defendant had no actual knowledge of the
defamatory statement or no reason to believe the statement was defamatory. The defense can be
defeated if the lack of knowledge was due to negligence. Thus, a delivery service cannot be held
liable for delivering a sealed defamatory letter.
Claimant is incapable of further defamatione.g., the claimant's position in the community is so
poor that defamation could not do further damage to the plaintiff. Such a claimant could be said to
be "libel-proof," since in most jurisdictions, actual damage is an essential element for a libel claim.
In addition to the above, the defendant may claim that the allegedly defamatory statement is not actually
capable of being defamatoryan insulting statement that does not actually harm someone's reputation is
prima facie not libelous.
Special rules apply in the case of statements made in the press concerning public figures. A series of court
rulings led by New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) established that for a public official (or
other legitimate public figure) to win a libel case, the statement must have been published knowing it to
be false or with reckless disregard to its truth, (also known as actual malice).
Under United States law, libel generally requires five key elements. The plaintiff must prove that the
information was published, the plaintiff was directly or indirectly identified, the remarks were defamatory
towards the plaintiff's reputation, the published information is false, and that the defendant is at fault.
The Associated Press estimates that 95% of libel cases involving news stories do not arise from highprofile news stories, but "run of the mill" local stories like news coverage of local criminal investigations or
trials, or business profiles. Media liability insurance is available to newspapers to cover potential damage
awards from libel lawsuits.

Defamation and freedom of speech
Page 12 of 142
Defamation laws may come into tension with freedom of speech, leading to censorship or chilling effects
where publishers fear lawsuits, or loss of reputation where individuals have no effective protection against
reckless or unfounded allegations. Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights permits
restrictions on freedom of speech which are necessary for the protection of the reputation or the rights of
others[11].
Jurisdictions resolve this tension in different ways, in particular in determining where the burden of proof
lies when unfounded allegations are made. The power of the internet to disseminate comment, which may
include malicious comment, has brought a new focus to the issue. [12]
There is a broader consensus against laws which criminalize defamation. Human rights organizations, and
other organizations such as the Council of Europe and Organization for Security and Co-operation in
Europe, have campaigned against strict defamation laws which criminalize defamation. [13][14] The European
Court of Human Rights has placed restrictions on criminal libel laws because of the freedom of expression
provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights. One notable case was Lingens v. Austria (1986).
United States
Main article: United States defamation law
The origins of US defamation law pre-date the American Revolution; one famous 1734 case involving John
Peter Zenger established some precedent that the truth should be an absolute defense against libel
charges. (Previous English defamation law had not provided this guarantee.) Though the First Amendment
of the U.S. Constitution was designed to protect freedom of the press, for most of the history of the United
States, the Supreme Court neglected to use it to rule on libel cases. This left libel laws, based upon the
traditional common law of defamation inherited from the English legal system, mixed across the states.
The 1964 case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, however, dramatically changed the nature of libel law in
the United States by establishing that public officials could win a suit for libel only if they could
demonstrate publishers' "knowledge that the information was false" or that it was published "with reckless
disregard of whether it was false or not". Later Supreme Court cases dismissed the claim for libel and
forbade libel claims for statements that are so ridiculous to be clearly not true, or are involving
opinionated subjects such as one's physical state of being. Recent cases have addressed defamation law
and the internet.
Defamation law in the United States is much less plaintiff-friendly than its counterparts in European and
the Commonwealth countries, due to the enforcement of the First Amendment. In the United States, a
comprehensive discussion of what is and is not libel or slander is difficult, because the definition differs
between different states, and under federal law. Some states codify what constitutes slander and libel
together into the same set of laws. Criminal libel is rare or nonexistent, depending on the state. Defenses
to libel that can result in dismissal before trial include the statement being one of opinion rather than fact
or being "fair comment and criticism". Truth is always a defense.
Most states recognize that some categories of statements are considered to be defamatory per se, such
that people making a defamation claim for these statements do not need to prove that the statement was
defamatory.
Page 13 of 142
_____________________________
Date: June 16, 2008
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
amgroup01@msn.com
Page 14 of 142
Lancaster Film Commission
1 of 1
http://lancasterfilmcommission.com/
Page 15 of 142
Jay Ingram - Executive Director
Home
About Us
Services
Gallery
Contact Us
The Lancaster Film Commission is a non-profit organization of artists and art

patrons who dedicate themselves to the promotion and expansion of film,
television and video production in the Greater Lancaster, Pennsylvania area. In
cooperation with the State of Pennsylvania Film Commission and the other local
film commissions in the Southeastern section of our state we will develop a solid
rapport with production companies in this area and the major film making cities on
both coasts. With the goal of bringing productions into Lancaster we will offer all
needed services i.e. scouting, permits, names and contact information of local
professionals, including production individuals and companies, plus talent
libraries. We will have updated databases listing businesses which support
productions by offering reduced rates and percentage discounts. We are a service
organization.
Our second goal is community goodwill. We will work to enhance the
entertainment and community relations and strive to unite them in a productive
capacity which will benefit all.
Thirdly we will support and encourage Independent productions, with contests and
festivals which will include film and video grants. There will also be a yearly Film
Festival, each October, which will include film and video projects (major and
minor) with celebrity presenters and participants.
2006 Lancaster Film Commission. All rights reserved.
10/7/2006 4:08 PM
1 of 1
http://lancasterfilmcommission.com/about.cfm
Page 16 of 142
Home
About Us
Services
Gallery
Contact Us
The Lancaster Film Commission will attract and assist film and digital productions.
The film industry generates over $30 billion outside the Los Angeles area and
production companies are always searching for new and supportive areas to set
up shop. LFC will also push for involvement by local businesses and the local film
and video professionals who would like to extend their credits. The positive impact
on Lancaster will be financially as well as artistically strong.
THE LANCASTER FILM COMMISSION IS

James Manley - Projects Coordinator & Media Manager
HONORARY BOARD MEMBERS
Senator Gibson Armstrong
Charles Smithgall
Glenn Robinson
Larry Alexander
Michael O'Day
Brad Hepfer
Timothy Marsden
Left to right are Jay Ingram, Charlie
Smithgall and Senator Gib Armstrong
10/7/2006 4:06 PM
1 of 1
http://lancasterfilmcommission.com/services.cfm
Page 17 of 142
Home
About Us
Services
Gallery
Contact Us
The Lancaster Film Commission offers assistance in many areas, including:

Handling and channeling of all city department requests
Communication with local businesses
Free production guide
Licensing aide and information
Labor relations
Location scouting and photo files
Website with all up-to-the-minute film news
24-hour database hotline
Film intern program
Organization of premieres of local films
Film writing competition
Film Festivals
Community relations
Youth program
LFC support tournaments
Sponsored student film projects
10/7/2006 4:07 PM
1 of 2
http://lancasterfilmcommission.com/gallery.cfm
Page 18 of 142
Home
About Us
Services
Gallery
Contact Us
Virtual Location Tours

These are a sampling of locations in the Lancaster area, viewable in 360 degree QuickTime virtual reality panoramas.
Click on any image below to see samples. If you need QuickTime go here. Additional scouting locations can use this
technique through Fulmedia Interactive.
Countryside
Lancaster's Amish Country
Downtown Lancaster
Various locations in downtown lancaster.
10/7/2006 4:08 PM
2 of 2
http://lancasterfilmcommission.com/gallery.cfm
Page 19 of 142
film festival
the first annual lancater film commission film festival will be held dec. 2, 2006.
all categories are accepted - short films, long films, documentaries, etc. Fees are 25 dollars per film. Send check and
dvd to lancaster film commission - 3714 nolt road -lalndisville - PA - 17538
10/7/2006 4:08 PM
Page 20 of 142
Lancaster Film Commission works to reel in

productions
By Olenchek, Christina
Publication: Central Penn Business Journal
Date: Friday, May 12 2006
Subject: Economic development
You are viewing page 1
Jay Ingram was already lending his writing, producing and acting skills to the movie "Rave On" when filming
arrived in Lancaster in late 2004. He soon discovered that there would be more to do as he tried to make sure
things went smoothly for the cast and crew.
"I had to do everything," said Ingram, a Hollywood veteran whose career includes stints on television shows
such as "LA Law," "Magnum,
Ads by Google
TV Commercial Production
Experienced Producers, Here 24/7Call Studio Center for your project
StudioCenter.com
Creative Media Production
ROI w.Effective, Dynamic MultimediaNational Top 100 Production Team
www.mazurmediacom.com
S.R. Film & Video Prod.
:30 Spots, Corporate, MarketingDVD/CD Copies, Film Transfer
www.SR-Pro.com
P.I." and "Another World. " 'I had to find caterers. I had to find lodging."
What Lancaster needed, Ingram told then-Mayor Charlie Smithgall, was a film commission to help attract
productions to the area and help people working on those productions connect with local businesses. Smithgall
agreed, and the Lancaster Film Commission was formed in August 2005, with Ingram as its director.
The nonprofit group has spurred about $1 million of economic activity through the projects it has been able to
attract during the past nine months, Ingram said. These projects include an episode of "Dateline NBC" and a
photo shoot featuring fashion photographer Peter Lindbergh. Ingram believes bringing in more projects could
provide many opportunities for businesses in the Lancaster area.
"We have a chance of making this community a place where a lot of films are made," he said.
Despite his organization's aim, Ingram's job is not necessarily a glamorous one. He is the commission's only
employee, running the organization out of his home in East Hempfield Township. He spends his time
connecting production companies coming to Lancaster with caterers, car-rental businesses and hotels willing to
provide discounts. He takes pictures around the county to send to people interested in the area. He spends many
hours on the phone.
"It's a sales job," he said.
Page 21 of 142
So far, about $35,000 has been poured into the commission's work. Some of that money has come from Ingram
himself, while other funds have come from the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic
Development.
Ingram wants to build on the past support the community has shown for the movie business, support forged
when the Harrison Ford movie "Witness" was partially filmed in Lancaster County in the early 1980s. Lancaster
has a variety of environments - old houses, new houses, urban areas, rural areas - that could attract film,
television and video productions, Ingram said. It is close to major metropolitan areas like New York City and
Philadelphia, too.
Distinctive Affairs Catering in Lancaster provided breakfast and lunch for the Lindbergh photo shoot. The
experience was an enjoyable one for the company, manager Brenda Hess said.
"It went well. They were very nice," she said. "If they would call again, we would help them out."
The commisson's efforts could mean more opportunities for college students to gain valuable work experience
in Lancaster County, said Dirk Eitzen, head of the film and media-studies program at Franklin Marshall College
in Lancaster. Many of the students at F&M and other institutions are looking for internships and ways to help
out with productions.
"If (the commission) succeeds, of course it's beneficial for students," Eitzen said. "There are eager students
here."
More people are becoming aware of the economic benefits that film and television projects bring to the state,
said Jane Saul, director of the Pennsylvania Film Office. Such projects generated $249 million in business
activity in 2005, according to statistics from the Harrisburgbased office.
While Philadelphia and Pittsburgh continue to attract the bulk of productions, some smaller areas are joining
Lancaster and forming film commissions. There is a film office in Scranton, as well as one that covers the
Pocono Mountains region. Regional offices offer production companies links to local businesses that the state
sometimes cannot provide, Saul said.
"Having regional offices is something that we welcome, she said. "It's a great help."
Ingram predicts big things for the Lancaster Film Commission. Several film productions expected to come to
the Lancaster area could provide between $5 million and $12 million in additional economic activity during the
summer, he said. Any businesses interested in becoming part of a database of companies willing to assist the
commission can e-mail Ingram at lfc1@comcast.net.
Bright lights, little cities
Parts of several movies have been filmed in the midstate. Movies, followed by their Central Pennsylvania
filming locations, include:
"Rough Cut" Harrisburg, Lancaster
"Girl, Interrupted" Harrisburg, Hanover, Cumberland County
"The Altoona Riding Club" Lancaster, Lebanon and Franklin counties
"Lucky Numbers" Harrisburg
"8 Millimeter" Harrisburg
Page 22 of 142
"For Richer or Poorer" York County

"Major League II" Harrisburg
"Gettysburg" Gettysburg, Adams County
"Mannequin" Harrisburg
"Witness" Lancaster County
SOURCE: PENNSYLVANIA FILM OFFICE
hours on the phone.
Development.
Philadelphia, too.
Jay Ingram was already lending his writing, producing and acting skills to the movie "Rave On" when filming
arrived in Lancaster in late 2004. He soon discovered that there would be more to do as he tried to make sure
things went smoothly for the cast and crew.
"I had to do everything," said Ingram, a Hollywood veteran whose career includes stints on television shows
such as "LA Law," "Magnum,
Ads by Google
Page 23 of 142
TV Commercial Production
Experienced Producers, Here 24/7Call Studio Center for your project
StudioCenter.com
Creative Media Production
ROI w.Effective, Dynamic MultimediaNational Top 100 Production Team
www.mazurmediacom.com
S.R. Film & Video Prod.
:30 Spots, Corporate, MarketingDVD/CD Copies, Film Transfer
www.SR-Pro.com
P.I." and "Another World. " 'I had to find caterers. I had to find lodging."
What Lancaster needed, Ingram told then-Mayor Charlie Smithgall, was a film commission to help attract
productions to the area and help people working on those productions connect with local businesses. Smithgall
agreed, and the Lancaster Film Commission was formed in August 2005, with Ingram as its director.
The nonprofit group has spurred about $1 million of economic activity through the projects it has been able to
attract during the past nine months, Ingram said. These projects include an episode of "Dateline NBC" and a
photo shoot featuring fashion photographer Peter Lindbergh. Ingram believes bringing in more projects could
provide many opportunities for businesses in the Lancaster area.
"We have a chance of making this community a place where a lot of films are made," he said.
hours on the phone.
Development.
Philadelphia, too.
Page 24 of 142
"If (the commission) succeeds, of course it's beneficial for students," Eitzen said. "There are eager students
here."
More people are becoming aware of the economic benefits that film and television projects bring to the state,
said Jane Saul, director of the Pennsylvania Film Office. Such projects generated $249 million in business
activity in 2005, according to statistics from the Harrisburgbased office.
While Philadelphia and Pittsburgh continue to attract the bulk of productions, some smaller areas are joining
Lancaster and forming film commissions. There is a film office in Scranton, as well as one that covers the
Pocono Mountains region. Regional offices offer production companies links to local businesses that the state
sometimes cannot provide, Saul said.
"Having regional offices is something that we welcome, she said. "It's a great help."
Ingram predicts big things for the Lancaster Film Commission. Several film productions expected to come to
the Lancaster area could provide between $5 million and $12 million in additional economic activity during the
summer, he said. Any businesses interested in becoming part of a database of companies willing to assist the
commission can e-mail Ingram at lfc1@comcast.net.
Bright lights, little cities
Parts of several movies have been filmed in the midstate. Movies, followed by their Central Pennsylvania
filming locations, include:
"Rough Cut" Harrisburg, Lancaster
"Girl, Interrupted" Harrisburg, Hanover, Cumberland County
"The Altoona Riding Club" Lancaster, Lebanon and Franklin counties
"Lucky Numbers" Harrisburg
"8 Millimeter" Harrisburg
"For Richer or Poorer" York County
"Major League II" Harrisburg
"Gettysburg" Gettysburg, Adams County
"Mannequin" Harrisburg
"Witness" Lancaster County
SOURCE: PENNSYLVANIA FILM OFFICE
Page 25 of 142
Page 26 of 142
RE: Iformation of Master Training Program
From: Stan Caterbone (amgroup01@msn.com)

Sent:Mon 2/25/08 7:54 AM
To: jay ingram lfc (lfc1@comcast.net)
Can you give me a time when you will be in today?
"Well, there's an even greater right, and that's the right of life, liberty and to live crime-free."
Craig Stedman, Lancaster County District Attorney
January 3, 2008
Lancaster Intelligencer Journal

Stan J. Caterbone
Visit Our Blog For Journey of a Whistleblower
Visit Our Blog For Research Into ESP - Mental Telepathy & The U.S. Governments Activities
Visit Our Video Biography
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publicly discredited since 1987
due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC
pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation
and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our
communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We continue our fight for
justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media
Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. Number 7.
From: lfc1@comcast.net
Subject: Re: Iformation of Master Training Program
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:47:09 -0500
Give a call first to make sure I'm here.
Jay
892-3844
----- Original Message ----From: Stan Caterbone
To: jay ingram lfc
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 9:17 PM
Subject: RE: Information of Master Training Program
Page 27 of 142
I'll stop by your office for a visit on Nolt Road, unless there is another location. I look forward
to some classes.
Thank You.
"Well, there's an even greater right, and that's the right of life, liberty and to live crimefree."
January 3, 2008

Stan J. Caterbone
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publicly
discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within International
Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud
in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the
media, which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further
libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through
the Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced
Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. Number 7.
From: lfc1@comcast.net
Subject: Re: Iformation of Master Training Program
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:51:38 -0500
Hi Stan,
Simply put, the Master Program entails any and all aspects of film
making. From the origination of an idea to the writing, rewriting, casting,
directing, producing and marketing.
A person who is interested in one or more of the aspects, signs up and
takes courses at their own rate of speed. Cost is nominal.
Best regards,
Jay Ingram
----- Original Message ----From: Stan Caterbone

To: lfc1@comcast.net
Page 28 of 142
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 10:21 AM

Subject: Iformation of Master Training Program
Could you please send me information on your Master Training Program?

Please visit some of my film experience by clicking here.
"Well, there's an even greater right, and that's the right of life, liberty and
to live crime-free."
January 3, 2008

Stan J. Caterbone
Visit Our Blog For Research Into ESP - Mental Telepathy & The U.S.
Governments Activities
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered,
defamed, and publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of
misconduct and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty
to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to
defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would
normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further
libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We continue our fight
for justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting our rights to
continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you
wish to be removed from our Contact List. Number 7.
Advanced Media Group Theater at Hotel Brunswick, December 26, 2009

Page 29 of 142
Page 1 of 38

Page 30 of 142

RE: Meeting wih the Dept of Justice.
From: Stan Caterbone (amgroup01@msn.com)
Sent: Sat 3/22/08 8:36 AM
To:
Barry A. Solodky (bas@bbt-law.com)
FBI, Field Office (philadelphia@fbi.gov); Landis, Detective Michael (landism@co.lancaster.pa.us);
Cc:
info@hotelbrunswick.com
Owings, Lisa (lisa_owings@judiciary-rep.senate.gov); friends@foxnews.com;
newsletter@billoreilly.com; samlombardo@benecon.com; webmaster@live8live.chtah.com;
tom.tillett@mail.house.gov; jcfmmf@aol.com; jbuckwalter@lnpnews.com; mhalc@supernet.com;
pwenger@fultonbank.com; scarfley@barley.com; nikoloff@edclancaster.com;
rodanast@rodanast.com; info@aclupa.org; info@bloodhoundsinc.com; cvr@rkglaw.com;
Bcc:
sstark@co.santa-barbara.ca.us; bethg@harrywalker.com; ureyp@co.lancaster.pa.us;
senator_specter@specter.senate.gov; contactoge@oge.gov; rplotkin@mcguirewoods.com;
maria_plakoudas@specter.senate.gov; lburkholder@thewgalchannel.com; beyyerdd@aol.com;
wengerr@co.lancaster.pa.us; rhino1818@aol.com; sunnews@lnpnews.com;
intellletters@lnpnews.com; neweraletters@lnpnews.com
March 22, 2008
Re: Meeting With Department of Justice
Barry Solodky,
First, I would have responded earlier, however, your email found it's way into my junk email.
Secondly, as an officer of the court, you better be careful about spreading lies about me and fabrications
about events that did not happen. By the way, a copy of this will go directly to the Federal Bureau of
Investigation Philadelphia Field Office and Detective Michael Landis of the Lancaster County District
Attorney Office. Who do you think you are talking to?
Thirdly, here is what transpired. The day before I received an ORDER from the Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, which was purposely postmarked 10 days after the Clerk filed and dated the Mail to copy to
myself. The ORDER was for a no response to a Show Cause ORDER, which someone had stole for my
mail, which I never received. The Third Circuit case was an appeal from my Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
Now, on Wednesday morning I made plans to go to the Hotel Brunswick and take some measurements in
the Movie Theater, which I am in the middle of a development plan. As usual, I walked into the lobby on
the street level adjacent to the parking garage and saw the eisel with the notice that the "Department of
Justice" was holding bankruptcy hearings. I was told a few years ago earlier in my Chapter 11 that they
often hold hearings in Lancaster, at the Brusnwick or at the Hotel on Manheim Pike. As soon as I saw the
sign I figured I would see if Joe Adams, my Trustee from the Philadelphia Office of the Department of
Justice Office of Trustee that handles my case, was here.
So, as I usually do, I went to the office of Kevin, the Hotel Brunswick General Manager to get the key to
the movie theater, as per our agreement with Hamid, the owner of the Hotel Brunswick. He was not in his
office, and the Desk Manager had to page him. I asked him where the Department of Justice was holding
the hearings, and told him I needed to talk to someone there, while he was trying to locate Kevin, the
General Manager. I told him I would be right back.
I went to the Presidential Room where they were holding meetings. When I arrived, the Trustee, or what
private panel trustee, was conducting a meeting with a Spanish woman, who had a young girl for a
translator. I patiently waited by the wall as you walk in until the entire interview was over. After the
private panel trustee dismissed the woman, I approached her and asked her if she was from the
Department of Justice Office of the Trustee, and she responded that she was a private panel trustee. I
simply told her that I had a problem with someone obstructing justice with my Third Circuit case and
asked her if Joe Adams was in her office. She said she was not from the Philadelphia Office. I gave her
my card and some woman kept trying to talk and interfere. I just calmly left. I went to meet Kevin, the
General Manager, he opened the movie theater and I spent approximately 1 hour taking measurements of
the existing floor plan.
Page 2 of 38

Page 31 of 142
There was no incident to speak of. Any incident was a lie, regardless of the person that kept interfering
with our conversation that was trying to cause problems. It was not me, you fool.
I would suggest that you provide this email to the person that told you that fabricated lie and anyone else
that you communicate with regarding your so called version of an "incident". Follow this link and you may
read why people like you lie about these incidents.
Now, you have a nice Easter Weekend. And by the way, I am a supporter of Senator Clinton and I do
volunteer my services, just in case you were wondering.
"Well, there's an even greater right, and that's the right of life, liberty and to live crime-free."
January 3, 2008
Stan J. Caterbone
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publicly discredited
since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of
Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are
forced to defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute
and expose public corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our
property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of
protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to
be removed from our Contact List. Number 7.
>
Page 3 of 38

Page 32 of 142

Subject:
> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:18:00 -0400
> From: bas@bbt-law.com
> To: amgroup01@msn.com
>
> Hi Stan,
>
> Hope this note finds you well.
>
> Yesterday afternoon I had to attend some bankruptcy meetings on behalf of some clients. While there
the Trustee told me about an event which concerned her. She showed me your card and told me what
happened. In fact she said she almost considered calling the police because of the incident.
>
> I assured her you were not the type of person that would do anything inappropriate. I did want you to
know she is not an employee of the Dept. of Justice or the Bankruptcy Court; she is a private panel
trustee just as I was for 33 years. If for some reason you have issues with the bankruptcy system she is
not a person who should be hassled as she has nothing to do with your case.
>
> I'm sending this only because I don't want there to be any further incidents which might cause her
concern or the Federal marshals will get involved and I know they can be nasty. Needless to say I don't
want to see anything to you which would cause you any problems.
>
> I am sure I will bump into you soon. Have a nice Easter.
>
>
> Barry A. Solodky, Esquire
> Blakinger, Byler & Thomas, P.C.
> 28 Penn Square
> Lancaster, PA 17603
> (717) 509-7273
> E-mail: bas@bbt-law.com
>
>
>
>
Page 4 of 38

Page 33 of 142
amgroup01@msn.com
Investors and/or interested deveopers please respond via email.
Advanced Media Group's (8) Year Investment into Downtown Lancaster,

The Lancaster Convention Center & Our UPS STORE Concept.
ADVACED MEDIA GROUPS (8) YEAR IVESTMET I DOWTOW LACASTER

This weekend at the Party that Mayor Rick Gray hosted on Friday night in the Dome, we were discussing
the needs for retail establishments in Downtown Lancaster. He had told me that the James Street
Improvement District had done a retail assessment of the current retail space and a needs analysis of
needed retail spaces that would compliment the already existing retail space. I have been investing time
and energies to the revitalization of Downtown Lancaster for the past 8 years.
I informed Rick that I have an exclusive agreement for a UPS Shipping/Copy Store in
Downtown Lancaster, and he thought it was a great fit and a great idea for Downtown
Lancaster. Advanced Media Group would also add services such as scanning, imaging, and
records management services that would attract an additional market to the concept.
I am an ardent advocate for the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center and in April of 2005 we sued the
Lancaster County Hoteliers for refusing to pay the Tourism Excise Tax. We are still continuing our efforts
for the Excelsior Place Development on East King Street.
We currently have a signed Non Disclosure Agreement with Realtor Jeff Lefevre and Caldwell Banker for
the Excelsior Place Property.
I also had authored the Development Plan for the S.N. Lombardo Development on 626 West Charllotte
Street in May of 2007.
In 2005 I had worked closely with Joe Pinto, the former General Manager for the Lancaster Barnstormers
and the Clipper Stadium; drawing on my experience working with Tony Bongiovi and Power Station
Studios in New York for our "Digital Movie". I was trying to help the Clipper Stadium locate and contract
music acts for a Summer Concert Series. I had begun talks with Sara McLachlan and hope that when
Sara
McLachlan
returns
on
tour
the
Clipper
will
be
one
of
her
concerts.
I had talks with Clair Brothers in Lititz (In 1987 Gene Clair was considering an investment into my
"Digital Movie with Tony Bongiovi) to try to help attract some acts to the Stadium. Unfortunately, when I
had met with Randy Patterson of the Redevelopment Authority, which owns the Stadium, I learned that
concerts were not a top priority for them or the Barnstormers.
Maybe that will change before next Spring. And of course, Sheryl Crow is a shareholder of Advanced
Media Group, so someday maybe she might come around. I was also trying to convince Joe Pinto of the
merits of a country concert or two, and we all know by now what Country Music means to Lancaster
County.
My family had various successful investments in Downtown Lancaster over the past 50 years. My fathers
first Dry Cleaners (Sam Caterbone Cleaners, Inc.,) was on the corner of Plum and Orange Streets before
expanding and moving to Manheim Pike in the early 1960s. My Uncle Dominic (Mickey) Roda was the
proprietor for Garvins Beauty Salon, in the former Garvins Department Store, which later moved across
the street to the Lancaster Parking Garage on East King Street. My other Uncle Benjamin Roda operated
Rodas Beauty Salon on East King Street. And I had an office for SJ Caterbone Painting and Renovating
Page 5 of 38

Page 34 of 142
on the corner of Walnut and Marshall Streets.
Here is my resume and below is my website for your information. You may also visit my Video Biography
by clicking here.
We do have a very successful track record for vision in our 25 year history of entrepreneurship.
Sincerely,
Stan J. Caterbone
Stan J. Caterbone
Visit Our Blog
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered,defamed, and publicly discredited since 1987
due to going public (WhistleBlower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within International Signal& Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC
pleaded guilty to selling arms toIraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend ourreputation
and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media,which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our
communications to thwartfurther libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and ourbusiness. We continue our fight
forjustice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of protectingour rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced
Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish tobe removed from our Contact List.
Page 6 of 38

Page 35 of 142
mailto:amgroup01@msn.com
Blog: http://advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com/
Research Bog: at: www.advancedmediagroupresearch.wordpress.com

Video Biography at: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=advancedmediagroup
Stanley J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Advanced Media Groups Downtown Lancaster Revitalization

Action Plan
Advanced Media Group has been working with Downtown Lancaster developers and the James Street
Investment District to facilitate this action plan.
Project 1 Excelsior Place on East King Street
In 1998 Advanced Media Group had developed a comprehensive plan for the revitalization of the Excelsior
Place Historic Property (Sprecher Brewery) located 1 block from the proposed Downtown Lancaster
Convention Center. We had planned a unique entertainment complex comprised of a Pub, an upscale
restaurant in the lower catacomb, and a nightclub in the first floor. We had also developed and designed a
state-of-the-art video conferencing facility to compliment the Convention Center. We have joined in the
talks and discussions with principals, stakeholders, and taxing authorities concerning the present proposals
and the future of the revitalization of Downtown Lancaster and the Convention Center.
Advanced Media Group/Project Hope filed a Civil Action in the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County
against Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort Inn (Lancaster County Hoteliers) for their attempts to withhold the
Tourism Tax and Hotel Tax that supports the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center. The City of Lancaster
supported the civil action. We also proposed an alternative plan to move the Convention Center to the Hotel
Brunswick and Lancaster Square to all of the major stakeholders.
In 2007 Advanced Media Group signed a Non Disclosure Agreement with a local real estate firm to continue
the advancement of the Excelsior Place Business Plan.
Project 2 UPS/MBE Copy Store or FedEx/Kinkos Copy & Print Store
Advanced Media Group has an exclusive agreement for a UPS Shipping/Copy Store or a FedEx/Kinkos
in Downtown Lancaster. There is no such service currently serving the needs of downtown businesses and it
is a vital component for the Lancaster County Convention Center. In 1998 Advanced Media Group had
contacted Mail Box Etc., and began initial franchise due diligence. However when the Lancaster County
Convention Center was stalled, Advanced Media Group also put the project on the back burner. In 2005
Advanced Media Group negotiated for the exclusive right of first refusal to move the UPS Store at Stone Mill
Plaza to downtown Lancaster.
Page 7 of 38

Page 36 of 142
The UPS/MBE Franchise is ranked number 4 among all franchises and number one in the shipping-postal
store categories by Forbes.
Advanced Media Group would also add services such as scanning, imaging, and records management
services that would attract an additional market to the concept. The UPS/MBE Franchise is ranked
number 4 among all franchises and number one in the shipping-postal store categories by Forbes. Advanced
Media Group is currently studying several site locations, including storefronts at the Brunswick Hotel, and a
possible East King Street site. Advanced Media Group would like to cater to the many legal firms that
conduct business in the Lancaster County Courthouse.
In 1990 Advanced Media Group developed and copyrighted the AMG Legal Systems Prototype which was
a digital search and retrieval application designed to help legal firms deal with the complexities of organizing
and filing court cases.
Advanced Media Group has specialized in records management and has a vast knowledge base and
experience in optical publishing and records management. This service would allow firms to convert and
store records off-site in a secure location with state-of-the-art retrieval services.
Typical Desktop Publishing services and binding services would also be offered.
Project 3 Downtown Lancaster Movie Theater
A downtown Lancaster Movie Theater is vital to support the Lancaster County Convention Center and the
Downtown Lancaster Revitalization at large.
Advanced Media Group has been performing due diligence on reopening the movie theaters at the Hotel
Brunswick for the past 18 months. A recent site survey confirms that the movie theaters are in perfect
operating condition and negotiations with local business leaders are continuing. The Brunswick movie
theater has 2 screens with approximately 500 seats per screen.
Project 4 Big Box Retail in Downtown Lancaster
Advanced Media Group has been attempting to help facilitate the attraction of a big box retailer for
Downtown Lancaster. In 2006 Advanced Media Group had discussions with the owner of Bulova
Technologies regarding the development of that building to a retail store. The Advanced Media Group has
contacted the Corporate development teams of the Hard Rock Caf and Best Buy Electronics Stores.
In 2005 Advanced Media Group had talks with former Mayor Charlie Smithgall in attempts at trying to lure a
Cabelas or a Pro Shops to the site.

Stan J. Caterbone
Visit Our Blog at: www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
Visit Our Video Biography at: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=advancedmediagroup
Visit Our Research Blog at: www.advancedmediagroupresearch.wordpress.com
Page 8 of 38
THEATER AT HOTEL BRUNSWICK

Page 37 of BUDGET
142
OPEARATING

March 28, 2008
Account Descriptions
SALES
Gross Sales Forcast
Theater 1
Theater 2
Performances
Concessions
Trailers
Advertisers
Theater Rentals
Sales - Misc
Total Sales
% of
Sales
Nov-09
Dec-09
Year 1
Jan-10
Year 1
Feb-10
Year 1
Mar-10
Year 1
Apr-10
Year 1
May-10
Year 1
Jun-10
Year 1
Jul-10
Year 1
Aug-10
Year 1
Sep-10
Year 1
Oct-10
Year 1
Nov-10
119,731
97,356
95,606
95,606
95,606
99,981
128,975
155,100
151,919
151,919
151,919
155,169
52.00%
12.00%
17.00%
18.00%
1.00%
100.00%
32,175
4,950
7,425
4,950
0
49,500
77,825
11,973
17,960
11,973
0
119,731
63,282
9,736
14,603
9,736
0
97,356
62,144
9,561
14,341
9,561
1,000
96,606
62,144
9,561
14,341
9,561
1,000
96,606
62,144
9,561
14,341
9,561
1,000
96,606
52,990
11,998
16,997
17,997
1,000
100,981
68,357
15,477
21,926
23,216
1,000
129,975
82,203
18,612
26,367
27,918
1,000
156,100
80,517
18,230
25,826
27,345
1,000
152,919
80,517
18,230
25,826
27,345
1,000
152,919
80,517
18,230
25,826
27,345
1,000
152,919
82,239
18,620
26,379
27,930
1,000
156,169
36.00%
43.00%
24.00%
34.00%
Total C.O.G.S.
GROSS PROFIT
11,583
2,129
1,782
1,683
17,177
32,324
28,017
5,148
4,310
4,071
41,547
78,185
22,781
4,186
3,505
3,310
33,783
63,574
22,372
4,111
3,442
3,251
33,175
63,431
22,372
4,111
3,442
3,251
33,175
63,431
22,372
4,111
3,442
3,251
33,175
63,431
19,076
5,159
4,079
6,119
34,434
66,548
24,608
6,655
5,262
7,893
44,419
85,556
29,593
8,003
6,328
9,492
53,416
102,684
28,986
7,839
6,198
9,297
52,321
100,598
28,986
7,839
6,198
9,297
52,321
100,598
28,986
7,839
6,198
9,297
52,321
100,598
29,606
8,007
6,331
9,496
53,440
102,729
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN
65.30%
65.30%
65.30%
65.66%
65.66%
65.66%
65.90%
65.82%
65.78%
65.79%
65.79%
65.79%
65.78%
Page 9 of 38
COST OF GOODS SOLD

Distribution Fees
Food & Beverage
49,500
OPERATING EXPENSES
Payroll & Related Expenses
Wages
Management Salaries
Payroll Taxes
Insurance, Work. Comp.
Insurance, Health
Total Payroll Related
21.16%
8.51%
3.08%
0.81%
1.25%
35%
20,856
10,833
3,600
1,029
1,595
37,914
20,856
10,833
3,600
1,029
1,595
37,914
20,856
10,833
3,600
1,029
1,595
37,914
20,856
10,833
3,600
1,029
1,595
37,914
20,856
10,833
3,600
1,029
1,595
37,914
20,856
10,833
3,600
1,029
1,595
37,914
30,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
47,541
30,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
47,541
30,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
47,541
30,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
47,541
30,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
47,541
30,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
47,541
30,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
47,541
Direct Operating Expenses

Supplies
Outside Services
Trash Removal
Total Direct Operating
1.24%
0.49%
0.58%
3.46%
1,578
618
741
2,937
1,578
618
741
2,937
1,578
618
741
2,937
1,578
618
741
2,937
1,578
618
741
2,937
1,578
618
741
2,937
1,578
618
741
2,937
1,578
618
741
2,937
1,578
618
741
2,937
1,578
618
741
2,937
1,578
618
741
2,937
1,578
618
741
2,937
1,578
618
741
2,937
12/26/2009
Page 1 of 6

Page 38 of BUDGET
142
OPEARATING

March 28, 2008
Non-Operating Expenses
Rent
Legal & Accounting
Insurance, Property & Liability
Misc General & Administrative
Debt Service
Total Non-Operating
Total Expenses
NET PROFIT
NET PROFIT MARGIN
12/26/2009
Nov-09
Dec-09
Year 1
Jan-10
Year 1
Feb-10
Year 1
Mar-10
Year 1
Apr-10
Year 1
May-10
Year 1
Jun-10
Year 1
Jul-10
Year 1
Aug-10
Year 1
Sep-10
Year 1
Oct-10
Year 1
Nov-10
3.10%
0.50%
0.19%
2.49%
0.40%
0.04%
0.48%
0.38%
0.25%
0.16%
0.10%
0.29%
0%
9%
3,954
642
247
2,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
10,193
3,954
642
247
2,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
10,193
3,954
642
247
2,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
10,193
3,954
642
247
2,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
10,193
3,954
642
247
2,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
10,193
3,954
642
247
2,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
10,193
3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193
3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193
3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193
3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193
3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193
3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193
3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193
3.93%
0.59%
0.34%
0.33%
0.79%
5.97%
0
755
429
417
1,000
2,601
28,860
0
755
429
417
1,000
2,601
28,860
5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
33,860
5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
33,860
5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
33,860
5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
33,860
5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
35,860
5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
35,860
5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
35,860
5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
35,860
5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
35,860
5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
35,860
5,000
755
429
417
1,000
7,601
35,860
-21,321
-43.07%
24,540
20.50%
4,930
5.06%
4,787
4.95%
4,787
4.95%
4,787
4.95%
-2,724
-2.70%
16,285
12.53%
33,412
21.40%
31,327
20.49%
31,327
20.49%
31,327
20.49%
33,457
21.42%
Page 2 of 6
Page 10 of 38
Indirect Operating Expenses

Advertising & Promotions
Repairs & Maintenance
Telephone (In-Utilities)
Utilities
Water & Sewer
Cable
Office Exp. & Supplies
Miscellaneous
Travel Expense
Licenses
Dues & Subscriptions
Contributions
Miscellaneous Taxes (DID)
Total Indirect Operating
% of
Sales

Page 39 of BUDGET
142
OPEARATING

March 28, 2008
Page 11 of 38
COST OF GOODS SOLD

Distribution Fees
Food & Beverage
Year 1
Dec-10
YEAR 1
FYE
Year 2
Jan-11
Year 2
Feb-11
Year 2
Mar-11
Year 2
Apr-11
Year 2
May-11
Year 2
Jun-11
Year 2
Jul-11
Year 2
Aug-11
Year 2
Sep-11
Year 2
Oct-11
Year 2
Nov-11
138,294
147,969
147,969
147,969
146,656
170,781
187,844
187,844
187,844
178,094
159,531
159,531
52.00%
12.00%
17.00%
18.00%
1.00%
100.00%
73,296
850,350
16,595
174,411
23,510
250,283
24,893
242,407
1,000
11,000
139,294 1,528,450
78,423
17,756
25,155
26,634
1,000
148,969
78,423
17,756
25,155
26,634
1,000
148,969
78,423
17,756
25,155
26,634
1,000
148,969
77,728
17,599
24,932
26,398
1,000
147,656
90,514
20,494
29,033
30,741
1,000
171,781
99,557
22,541
31,933
33,812
1,000
188,844
99,557
22,541
31,933
33,812
1,000
188,844
99,557
22,541
31,933
33,812
1,000
188,844
94,390
21,371
30,276
32,057
1,000
179,094
84,552
19,144
27,120
28,716
1,000
160,531
84,552
19,144
27,120
28,716
1,000
160,531
36.00%
43.00%
24.00%
34.00%
26,386
306,126
7,136
74,997
5,642
60,068
8,464
82,418
47,628
523,609
91,665 1,004,841
28,232
7,635
6,037
9,056
50,960
98,008
28,232
7,635
6,037
9,056
50,960
98,008
28,232
7,635
6,037
9,056
50,960
98,008
27,982
7,567
5,984
8,975
50,508
97,148
32,585
8,812
6,968
10,452
58,817
112,964
35,841
9,693
7,664
11,496
64,693
124,150
35,841
9,693
7,664
11,496
64,693
124,150
35,841
9,693
7,664
11,496
64,693
124,150
33,980
9,190
7,266
10,899
61,335
117,758
30,439
8,232
6,509
9,763
54,943
105,589
30,439
8,232
6,509
9,763
54,943
105,589
Total C.O.G.S.
GROSS PROFIT
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN
65.81%
65.74%
65.79%
65.79%
65.79%
65.79%
65.76%
65.74%
65.74%
65.74%
65.75%
65.77%
65.77%
OPERATING EXPENSES
Wages
Management Salaries
Payroll Taxes
Insurance, Health
21.16%
8.51%
3.08%
0.81%
1.25%
35%
30,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
47,541
323,424
130,000
47,067
12,351
19,142
531,983
32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541
32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541
32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541
32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541
32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541
32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541
32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541
32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541
32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541
32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541
32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541

Supplies
Outside Services
Trash Removal
1.24%
0.49%
0.58%
3.46%
1,578
618
741
2,937
18,930
7,413
8,896
35,240
18,930
8,523
8,896
36,349
1,578
710
741
3,029
1,578
710
741
3,029
1,578
710
741
3,029
1,578
710
741
3,029
1,578
710
741
3,029
1,578
710
741
3,029
1,578
710
741
3,029
1,578
710
741
3,029
1,578
710
741
3,029
1,578
710
741
3,029
12/26/2009
Page 3 of 6
SALES
Gross Sales Forcast
Theater 1
Theater 2
Performances
Concessions
Trailers
Advertisers
Theater Rentals
Sales - Misc
Total Sales
% of
Sales

Page 40 of BUDGET
142
OPEARATING

March 28, 2008
Rent
Legal & Accounting
Debt Service
Total Non-Operating
Total Expenses
NET PROFIT
NET PROFIT MARGIN
12/26/2009
Year 1
Dec-10
YEAR 1
FYE
Year 2
Jan-11
Year 2
Feb-11
Year 2
Mar-11
Year 2
Apr-11
Year 2
May-11
Year 2
Jun-11
Year 2
Jul-11
Year 2
Aug-11
Year 2
Sep-11
Year 2
Oct-11
Year 2
Nov-11
3.10%
0.50%
0.19%
2.49%
0.40%
0.04%
0.48%
0.38%
0.25%
0.16%
0.10%
0.29%
0%
9%
3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193
47,445
7,710
2,965
38,000
6,144
571
7,367
5,833
3,756
2,521
1,500
4,500
2,000
130,311
3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193
3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193
3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193
3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193
3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193
3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193
3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193
3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193
3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193
3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193
3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193
3.93%
0.59%
0.34%
0.33%
0.79%
5.97%
5,000
60,000
755
9,065
429
5,149
417
5,000
1,000
12,000
7,601
91,214
35,860 1,312,356
10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
109,884
10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
76,564
10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
76,564
10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
76,564
10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
76,564
10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
76,564
10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
76,564
10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
76,564
10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
76,564
10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
76,564
10,200
755
429
417
1,000
12,801
76,564
-11,876
-7.97%
21,444
14.40%
21,444
14.40%
20,584
13.94%
36,400
21.19%
47,586
25.20%
47,586
25.20%
47,586
25.20%
41,194
23.00%
29,025
18.08%
29,025
18.08%
22,394
16.08%
216,094
14.14%
Page 4 of 6
Page 12 of 38

Utilities
Water & Sewer
Cable
Miscellaneous
Travel Expense
Licenses
Contributions
% of
Sales

Page 41 of BUDGET
142
OPEARATING

March 28, 2008
Page 13 of 38
COST OF GOODS SOLD

Distribution Fees
Food & Beverage
Year 2
Dec-11
YEAR 2
FYE
181,469 2,003,500
52.00%
12.00%
17.00%
18.00%
1.00%
100.00%
96,178 1,061,855
21,776
240,420
30,850
340,595
32,664
360,630
1,000
12,000
182,469 2,015,500
36.00%
43.00%
24.00%
34.00%
34,624
382,268
9,364
103,381
7,404
81,743
11,106
122,614
62,498
690,005
119,971 1,325,495
Total C.O.G.S.
GROSS PROFIT
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN
65.75%
65.77%
OPERATING EXPENSES
Wages
Management Salaries
Payroll Taxes
Insurance, Health
21.16%
8.51%
3.08%
0.81%
1.25%
35%
32,000
10,833
4,083
1,029
1,595
49,541
384,000
130,000
49,000
12,351
19,142
594,493

Supplies
Outside Services
Trash Removal
1.24%
0.49%
0.58%
3.46%
1,578
710
741
3,029
36,283
16,336
17,051
69,670
12/26/2009
Page 5 of 6
SALES
Gross Sales Forcast
Theater 1
Theater 2
Performances
Concessions
Trailers
Advertisers
Theater Rentals
Sales - Misc
Total Sales
% of
Sales

Page 42 of BUDGET
142
OPEARATING

March 28, 2008
Rent
Legal & Accounting
Debt Service
Total Non-Operating
Total Expenses
NET PROFIT
NET PROFIT MARGIN
12/26/2009
Year 2
Dec-11
YEAR 2
FYE
3.10%
0.50%
0.19%
2.49%
0.40%
0.04%
0.48%
0.38%
0.25%
0.16%
0.10%
0.29%
0%
9%
3,954
642
247
3,500
512
48
614
486
313
210
125
375
167
11,193
3.93%
0.59%
0.34%
0.33%
0.79%
5.97%
10,200
122,400
755
9,065
429
5,149
417
5,000
1,000
12,000
12,801
153,614
76,564 1,642,092
43,407
23.79%
47,445
7,710
2,965
42,000
6,144
571
7,367
5,833
3,756
2,521
1,500
4,500
2,000
134,311
373,408
18.53%
Page 6 of 6
Page 14 of 38

Utilities
Water & Sewer
Cable
Miscellaneous
Travel Expense
Licenses
Contributions
% of
Sales

Page 43 of 142
Not Inclusive - Shared Costs To Be Determined

CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
BUDGET
LOBBY
Paint
Concession Counters & Displays
Popcorn Machines
Food Displays
Carpet Restoration
Lobby Subtotal
$0.00
Ticket Booth & Office Subtotal
$0.00
TICKET BOOTH & OFFICE

Ticket System
Office Furnishings
THEATER 1
Curtains
Theater Seats
Floor Lighting
Floor Painting/Carpeting
Sound System
Theater 1 Subtotal
$0.00
Theater 2 Subtotal
$0.00
Stage Subtotal
$0.00
THEATER 2
Curtains
Theater Seats
Floor Lighting
Floor Painting/Carpeting
Sound System
STAGE
Sound System
Lighting
Stage
Moveable Partition
Backstage Setup
Projection Room
Projector 1
Projector 2
DLP Projector 1
DLP Projector 2
Page 15 of 38
ALTERNATE
FUNDING

Page 44 of 142
Racks
Painting
Floor Paint/Carpeting
Projection Room Subtotal
$0.00
2ND FLOOR OFFICES

Computer Systems
Desk and Counters
Office Supplies
Legal - Registration/Agreements
Design - Logo/Stationary/Business Cards
Printers/Calculators/IPOD/Iphone
2nd Floor Subtotal
$0.00
Total Costs
$0.00
Page 16 of 38
Page 45 of 142
Strong Cinema Products
Equipment Quotation
A wholly-owned subsidiary of Ballantyne of Omaha
4350 McKinley Street, Omaha, NE 68112 USA

TEL: +1 (402) 453-4444; FAX: +1 (402) 453-7238
WEB: www.strong-cinema.com; EMAIL: CustSales@btn-inc.com
DEALER (Exporter):
SHIP TO (Project):
Roger Fitzwater
2 screens
717-278-4199
woodcrestaudio@yahoo.com
Line
Item
Quant Unit
Order No.
Description
Quote No.: QSTSRF_10908

Date:
1/8/08
Customer Request:
1/8/08
Prices Good For:
90 days
Customer Account No.:
Req'd Date of Shipment:
Method of Transport:
TBA
Goods Terms:
TBA
Freight Terms:
FOB Omaha
Handling/Duties Agent:
Unit
Net (US$)
Unit LIST
Price (US$)
Total
Net (US$)
Film Equipment
2
EA SIMSYS3/RS
EA HLIIA-HR3
XENON CONSOLE SYSTEM:

Strong Highlight II Console System 3000 watts
EA PREWIRE
Projector Prewired
SET FGS-35
eCNA100-C1
Simplex Millennium II 35mm Projector:

w/ Two-Lens Manual Turret
w/ New Analog LED Visible red readers
Change over Unit
Synch Motor 110/220V, 60Hz.
35mm Upper & Lower Film Guidance system
Strong eCNA100 console mount automation with Single

termination board(394321-2K) Failsafe included
$13,430.00
40%
$8,058.00
$260.00 40%
$156.00
$9,935.00 40%
$5,961.00
$475.00 40%
$285.00
$3,160.00 40%
$1,896.00
16,116.00
312.00
11,922.00
570.00
3,792.00
EA LTIX3000WH
3000 watts Xenon bulbs
$1,050.00
50%
$525.00
1,575.00
8
9
10
2
1
1
EA 2464160
EA 2465004
EA 2468278
PLATTER SYSTEM:
35SCDC-3 35mm 3 Deck platter w/ 2 Payout Assy
AP Make-Up Table
SP-35 35mm tape splicer
$6,450.00 45%
$1,330.00 45%
$800.00 45%
$3,547.50
$731.50
$440.00
7,095.00
731.50
440.00
11
12
2
2
EA ISCO
EA ISCO
LENSES
ISCO Lens FLAT (Sizes to be determined)
ISCO Lens SCOPE (Sizes to be determined)
$860.00
$1,962.00
1,720.00
3,924.00
Page 1 of 2
Page 17 of 38
File: QSTS RF_10908

13
EA SR-70B
14
EA
15
16
17
20
20
Page
142
Basic Sound Rack with Power
strip, 46
fan, of
rack
panel and prewire
SC-322
2-way, 2x15", bi-amp screen channel, consists of DCS HF-63

and DCS LF-3215 components
SB-7218
Cinema subwoofer, dual 18" 1500 W transducers, 101 dB

sensitivity
SR-110B
QM-SW
EA
EA
EA
$1,000.00
Thursday,
2,000.00
7,365.00
$1,227.50
$1,067.25
2,134.50
Cinema surround loudspeaker, 10" 2-way, 95H x 85V, 94 dB

sensitivity
$266.00
5,320.00
Side wall quick-mount for DCS-SR-18, SR-26, SR-46 and SR110B
$17.30
346.00
18
EA
2 channels, 625 watts/ch at 8O, 1050 watts/ch at 4O, 1500

DCA 3022 watts/ch at 2O for Subwoofer
19
EA
20
EA
November 5, 2015
$1,165.25
2,330.50

DCA 1622 watts/ch at 2O for Stage
$776.50
4,659.00

DCA 2422 watts/ch at 2O for Surrounds
$974.00
3,896.00
76,248.50
All Prices are FCA Origin or Ballantyne of Omaha. Please allow

4-6 weeks lead time on major equipment orders.
50% due with order.
File: QSTS RF_10908
Page 2 of 2
Page 18 of 38
Total FOB Omaha NE

Page 47 of 142
Published on April 15, 2008, Lancaster New Era (PA)
Walk This Way
Get ready for a sea change,'' says Rick Gray. Lancaster's enthusiastic mayor is talking about how the
downtown will look next spring, when the first visitors arrive at the Lancaster County Convention Center
and Marriott Hotel on Penn Square.
If all goes as planned, the difference will be dramatic. Sidewalks, lighting, benches and trash receptacles
will be standardized by then to unify the downtown streetscape. And new street trees will be planted.
Click for complete article, (1046 words)
Article 4 of 2121, 677490000000.1109609

Published on April 13, 2008, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)
The future that wasn't
Believe it or not, it was once a nice place. Not long ago, there was news about the partial demolition of the
east side of Lancaster Square, that desolate, windswept plaza surrounded by the hulking, windowless
Bulova building on one side and the Hotel Brunswick on the other, all connected by a creepy, abandoned,
multilevel concrete walkway.
It's all so ... so ... Soviet. And so sad. But it wasn't always that way. I remember.
When Lancaster Square went up around
Article 5 of 2121, 677490120008.080013.1109609

The Future That Wasn't
Believe it or not, it was once a nice place. Not long ago, there was news about the partial demolition of the
east side of Lancaster Square, that desolate, windswept plaza surrounded by the hulking, windowless
Bulova building on one side and the Hotel Brunswick on the other, all connected by a creepy, abandoned,
multilevel concrete walkway.
It's all so ... so ... Soviet. And so sad. But it wasn't always that way. I remember.
When Lancaster Square went up around
Published on February 27, 2008, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)

Lancaster Square could see start of overhaul as soon as summer
City officials said Tuesday that plans to demolish portions of Lancaster Square are being finalized and
pieces of the concrete eyesore could start coming down this summer. The proposed work would occur on
the east side of the square - between the Hotel Brunswick and the Bulova building - and likely would
include demolition of the pedestrian walkway that spans North Queen Street, the stairwell and planter on
the south side of the square and the removal of the roof around the second-floor
Page 19 of 38


Page 48 of 142
Published on August 30, 2007, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)

Lancaster Square: It's a dirty job, but ...
Maybe Mike Rowe would be up for the job. You might know him as the wisecracking host of "Dirty Jobs"
on the Discovery Channel. One week he's picking up roadkill; the next he's feeling inside a cow for a fetus.
Rowe shows us the people who do these jobs, and he rolls up his sleeves, holds his nose and tries the
work himself.
Well, we have a job in Lancaster he should try.
It's not catching the acid vandal. I'm afraid
Published on January 21, 2007, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)
Budget to build
Up until now the convention center project on Penn Square has been much on "Big talk, little action." Next
month that should change, says the executive director of the Lancaster County Convention Center
Authority.
When the authority's new budget is unveiled, the public will see evidence that the embattled project is
well under way, said David Hixson, because the majority of the authority's spending in fiscal 2007-08 will
go toward actually
Published on December 24, 2006, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)
Authority started marketing work on project in 2003
Dan Logan doesn't just live his job. He eats and sleeps it, too. And that's a good thing, because Logan,
president and owner of Growth Business Development, Medford, N.J., makes a living as a consultant to
the hospitality industry.
For several years, Logan, once vice president of operations for the Hotel Brunswick, has worked with the
Lancaster County Convention Center Authority and others in the local tourism and hospitality industries to
develop a plan to market
Two squares beat as one
The fortunes of Lancaster Square are tied to those of Penn Square, according to the owner of Hotel
Brunswick. Hamid Zahedi wrote Wednesday that his hotel, based at Lancaster Square, could be renovated
to "four-diamond/four-star" quality, and its two-story concrete annex transformed into "two or three
restaurants ... plus entertainment for persons in their 30s and older."
Zahedi outlined his vision Wednesday in a letter to Lancaster County
Page 20 of 38

Page 49 of 142

Move convention center 1 block away
TO THE EDITOR: Now that there is some type of finality to the controversy of the convention center, I
would like to make a suggestion to the county, Penn Square Partners and anyone involved with the
downtown convention center idea. I have been relating this idea to numerous friends over the past six
months, and every one of them has thought it to be an excellent idea.
I think the convention center concept is a great idea. However, the cost and scope of the "former"
Article 125 of 2121, 677490000000.873631

Published on August 2, 2006, Lancaster New Era (PA)
Convention center needed Lillian G. Bennett Lancaster
Editor, New Era: Lancaster needs a convention center, not a Plan "B."
Look what good things happened to Covington, Ky., an excellent example of a new discovery for people
who want to know about this country.
Lancaster County not only has country but the city to offer visitors.
How many people know that this is the oldest inland city in our country that opened up the West? How
many know that Thaddeus Stevens and James Buchanan battled it out politically here
Article 126 of 2121, 677490000000.872402

Published on July 30, 2006, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)
FAN MAIL Days until I let my Lancaster Newspapers subscription expire: 53.
Jim Mertz, Ephrata
CONVENTION CENTER, HOTEL PROJECT
In an article published over a year ago on your editorial pages, I asked:
"Is the downtown situation so unpromising that we need to do 'something', no matter how great the
subsidy, how much is put at risk, and how questionable the prospects for success?"
I then went on to describe several alternative
Published on June 26, 2006, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Claims downtown boat may leak
TO THE EDITOR: I would like to respond to J. Herbert Zug's letter ("Raising questions on downtown plan,"
Intell, June 20).
Zug uses the analogy "a rising tide lifts all boats" unless the boat has a hole in it. He asserts that those in
opposition to the proposed convention center and hotel project are in the boats with the leaks.
Unfortunately, it is Zug's argument that is doomed to sink. His letter takes liberty
Page 21 of 38

Page 50 of 142
Article 137 of 2121, 677490000000.857213

Published on June 23, 2006, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Great divide laid bare at convention center mtg.
A steady stream of people at Ephrata Public Library stood behind a microphone stand Thursday night,
waiting for a chance to vent their feelings about the controversial hotel/convention center proposed for
downtown Lancaster. Some criticized the project. Others spoke in favor of it.
Whether people were "right" or "wrong," it was clear Thursday night the community remains strongly
divided over the project.
More than 60 people attended the
Published on May 5, 2006, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
County study takes dim view of center
Developers of the proposed downtown convention center/hotel should consider "downsizing" the project or
finding an "alternate use for the site." If the current project is built as proposed, it will lose $1.3 million
per year.
So says the executive summary of a feasibility study of the $139.8 million project completed by PKF
Consulting at the request of the Lancaster County commissioners.
The summary was presented by PKF partner Dave Arnold
Published on December 25, 2005, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)
Ed Flick exemplifies the spirit of Christmas
Judy A.
Strausbaugh Ed Flick's office at Fulton Bank overlooks Penn Square, where all kinds of people traverse.
It's one of Flick's favorite views because he likes people.
Saturday morning, he was near his office helping people less fortunate have a Merry Christmas.
For the fourth straight year, the longtime banking executive volunteered to help fill and distribute 1,200
boxes of food for Lancaster County Project for the
Article 185 of 2121, 777415

Published on December 19, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Rep. Pitts leads fight to derail slots parlor
A developer of the proposed slot-machine parlor in downtown Lancaster said Sunday more developments
related to the project could be announced as early as this week.
Page 22 of 38

Page 51 of 142

Also, local leaders and U.S.
Rep.
Joseph Pitts are expected to convene today at Lancaster County Courthouse with the aim of developing
strategies to kill the $150 million project proposed for the Bulova Technologies building.
"To develop a consensus on a game plan and to work together" is how
Article 186 of 2121, 777659

Published on December 19, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)
The Bulova building: Casino or federal courthouse?
The downtown Lancaster building where two local attorneys want to open a slots parlor is also among the
U.S. government's favored sites for a new federal courthouse, officials said today.
"It's my understanding that people in the federal government are focusing on the Bulova building as the
best-suited site for a courthouse," Mayor-elect Rick Gray said this morning.
"My understanding is that it's along the way with
Published on November 9, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Lancaster elects Gray as mayor
Election Day was Gray's day in Lancaster city.
Democratic challenger Rick Gray defeated two-term incumbent Mayor Charlie Smithgall Tuesday by 1,323
votes, based on unofficial results.
"There's going to be a new day in Lancaster," Gray told a cheering crowd gathered in a Hotel Brunswick
ballroom.
"Now we have the real task ahead of us the task of governing."
A defeated and tired-looking Smithgall
Article 206 of 2121, 761167

Published on November 9, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Democratic ticket sweeps into City Council, takes 2 row offices
Lancaster city Democrats celebrated a sweep of City Council and two row offices Tuesday, upsetting a
strong Republican ticket that included three two-term incumbents.
"We're going to bring civility back to City Council," newly elected City Councilwoman Kendra Saunders said
Tuesday night at an election-night gathering in a ballroom at Hotel Brunswick.
The victory by Saunders, Louise Williams, Tim Roschel and Jose Urdaneta means, starting in January,
Article 207 of 2121, 761414

Published on November 9, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)
Page 23 of 38

Page 52 of 142
Gray's stunning win highlights big day for local Democrats How did he pull it off?
As Rick Gray emphasized late Tuesday night, today is a new day in Lancaster.
With chants of "Sweep! Sweep! Sweep!," jubilant Lancaster City Democrats Tuesday night celebrated the
ousting of Republican Mayor Charlie Smithgall, all four Republicans on City Council, and Republican control
of the city controller and treasurer offices.
Gray, the Democratic mayoral candidate, rode a wave of change to an overwhelming victory.
He took 58 percent of the vote in his
Published on October 21, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Maybe Lancaster Square needs an exorcism
I've begun to wonder whether a curse has been placed on Lancaster Square.
Could it be that the ghosts of the original Brunswick Hotel, the old Lancaster YMCA and the Grand Theater
flattened by the wrecking ball in the 1960s to make way for so-called progress have gotten back at
us for our folly?
When it comes to Lancaster Square, it's almost eerie the way we can't get our act together. The paralysis
is maddening,
Article 219 of 2121, 751343

City, county take new looks at Lancaster Sq.
Lancaster city and county officials, recently at odds over projects in the city, are separately pushing for
new plans to revamp the east side of Lancaster Square, which has been widely criticized for being little
more than a concrete eyesore.
Mayor Charlie Smithgall said Sunday he has asked Hunter Interests Inc. of Maryland to submit a revised
edition of its 2002 Lancaster Square Master Plan and expects to hear from it this week.
Hunter's original vision was to put the
Article 220 of 2121, 751605

Published on October 18, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)
What's in store for Lancaster Square?
Lancaster City and county officials who have been sharply divided on Penn Square are both setting
their sights on Lancaster Square.
Lancaster Mayor Charlie Smithgall has asked Hunter Interests Inc., a Maryland consultant, to revise its
2002 Lancaster Square Master Plan. He expects an answer this week.
Meanwhile, county administrator Don Elliott says he has asked Franklin & Marshall College to survey
county residents about what they would like to
Page 24 of 38

Page 53 of 142

Bankruptcy filers need not go for broke
Though it may come as a surprise to some, the new bankruptcy law that takes effect Monday does not
allow bankers to collect a pound of flesh from debtors.
In fact, attorneys and bankers say the new law will seriously impact at most 10 percent of people filing for
Chapter 7 bankruptcy the most common type of bankruptcy filing in Lancaster County.
Chapter 7 offers debtors a clean slate and complete relief from their debts.
But fears that the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention
Published on October 2, 2005, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)
Build on success to revitalize city
Robert E. Field
In planning for the future it is important to avoid mistakes of the past; and building on current successes
is less risky than pursuing untested concepts.
With the proposed convention center/hotel, it is especially urgent that we avoid the mistakes that led to
the failure of Lancaster Square, or we may go down the same disastrous road.
The reasons for that failure, as given by former mayor and guest columnist Art Morris on Aug. 18, were
very wide of the mark.
When
Article 225 of 2121, 744309

Published on October 1, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)
Host Resort has new owner
A Florida company with a track record of remodeling its holdings has bought the Lancaster Host Resort &
Conference Center for an undisclosed price.
Milestone Hospitality acquired the Lincoln Highway East property Sept. 23, according to a letter from the
motel's departing management company.
The 39-year-old motel in East Lampeter Township is a cornerstone of the county's tourism industry.
With 330 rooms, it's the county's
Published on September 22, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Smithgall reopens campaign center at Brunswick for
run-up to the election
Touting his record as a crime fighter and job creator, Mayor Charlie Smithgall officially reopened his
campaign headquarters Wednesday at the Brunswick Hotel.
Page 25 of 38

Page 54 of 142
Surrounded by his family and 25 supporters, the Republican mayor said, if re-elected, he would continue
to put pressure on criminals, push economic development and work hard to create more jobs.
"Eight years ago, I ran for mayor because I believed that the city was headed in the wrong direction,"
Smithgall
Published on July 26, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Senate panel OKs funds for Lancaster Square, city garage
Lancaster Mayor Charlie Smithgalls plan to put the historic Rocky Springs Carousel in Lancaster Square
got more federal support Monday. The U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee voted to include $200,000
for the rehabilitation of Lancaster Square in its version of the Departments of Transportation, Treasury,
Judiciary, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Fiscal Year 2006 Appropriations bill,
U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter said Monday. The Pennsylvania Republican said the
Published on July 13, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)
The Brunswicks new Taste
THE WEEKLY DISH By E. Martin HulseJIM SWITZENBERG AND RON PFEIFFER have brought a new taste to
town. Taste at the Brunswick (151 N. Queen St., Lancaster, 397-4800) will open for dinner Friday with
eclectic city food, says Switzenberg, director of operations for Taste Catering, which recently partnered
with the Brunswick Hotel, owned by Hamid Zahedi. Tim Olivett, a Tavern on the Green and Moshulu alum,
was hired as chef, which returns the Hempfield graduate to the
Published on May 22, 2005, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)

New look,hours for Brunswick eatery
The restaurant and bar in the historic downtown Hotel Brunswick is receiving a facelift.
Since the hotel was bought by Hamid Zahedi in February, the lounge and bar was closed and the
restaurant was only open for breakfast, mainly for hotel customers.
The lounge and bar reopened this weekend to the public with new paint and carpeting, and will be
completely renovated within the next two weeks with a new bar, dining and lounge furniture. Additionally,
lunch and brunch are expected to open
Article 255 of 2121, 10238724

Published on May 18, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)
Library tax rejected; mayor, supporters prevail in city
City impact? Fall campaigns will target revitalization
Russ Miller called Luis Mendoza last night in hopes of burying the hatchet.
Page 26 of 38

Page 55 of 142
The city GOP chairman said the party must reunify after Mayor Charlie Smithgall handily defeated
challenger Mendoza by nearly a two-to-one margin in Tuesday's primary election.
Smithgall earned 65 percent of Republican votes.
"Luis has been a good Republican in the past and I hope we can get everyone on board working for a
victory in November," said Miller.
United the
Published on April 20, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Brunswick owner seeks to revive movie house
The new owner of the Ramada Inn Brunswick is proposing to revitalize a portion of Lancaster Square into a
movie/performing arts theater.
But before Hamid Zahedi of New York begins, he wants to see more people invest in entertainment
attractions downtown, said a consultant during a press conference Tuesday on the square.
Thomas DePaul of the DePaul Group of Lancaster said he was hired by Zahedi to develop the project at the
former Eric Theater, located next to the Brunswick.
DePaul
Article 266 of 2121, 10235702

Turn W&S into an IMAX theater
TO THE EDITOR:
It's hard to believe that the proposed convention center for Penn Square is still being considered. Can't
Penn Square Partners read? Common knowledge makes it clear that the convention center business is a
mess, "plagued by a taxpayer-funded burst of expansion and a continuing dearth of customers." To entice
business, convention center managers are giving space away.
I suggest that anyone who wants an honest appraisal of the
Article 267 of 2121, 10235539

Teaching retailers to capitalize on convention center
A national small-retailing expert plans to tell Lancaster city store owners how they can do more than just
scratch their niche.
John Ogden, a professor at Kutztown University's Small Business Development Center and a published
consultant on retail marketing, will visit Tuesday morning at the request of the Downtown Investment
District Authority.
Kelly Withum, who became director of the DID about three months ago, said the organization is
sponsoring Ogden's visit
Page 27 of 38

Page 56 of 142
Article 268 of 2121, 10235545

Following faith, D.R.E.A.M.S.
Entrepreneur who overcame hard times seeks to boost women, minority businesses.
An entrepreneur relatively unknown in Lancaster wants to introduce his venture by helping other small
businesses showcase what they have to offer.
Macajah Lee Brown Jr. is organizing the Women & Minority Business Expo, set for 4 to 10 p.m. April 28 at
the Brunswick Hotel, 151 N. Queen St.
Brown, 45, is founder of D.R.E.A.M.S. Minority Business Network, a one-man operation that looks for
partners who share his desire to boost entrepreneurial opportunities for women, blacks,
Published on March 22, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)
Shaub accuses Henderson of attempting to kill hotel project
Lancaster County Commissioner Pete Shaub accused fellow Commissioner Molly Henderson this morning of
attempting to snuff out hope for a Penn Square hotel and convention center.
Henderson presented motions this morning that would direct county attorneys to look for alternatives to
the $129 million Marriott hotel and meeting center planned for the former Watt & Shand building.
That project remains on life support as lawmakers attempt to advance a compromise tax arrangement
Article 280 of 2121, 10232443

What about the Brunswick?
The new owners of Hotel Brunswick are trying to take advantage of the apparent failure of the planned
$129 million Penn Square hotel and convention center.
Hamid Zahedi, whose real estate partnership purchased the aging Brunswick in January, has suggested
convention center planners now turn their attention to his Lancaster Square property, two blocks north.
"All I am saying is if they're so hell-bent on having a convention center, this is another
Hotel Brunswick aims to meet rising expectations

First renovated rooms in $4 million project ready to open this month.
Lancaster New Era
Published: May 04, 2007
12:40 EST
Article
Photos
Related
Share It
Page 28 of 38

Link Tags

Page 57 of 142
By TIM MEKEEL
The complete text of this article is no longer available online.
Recent Posts
Showing 5 most recent comments out of 16 total TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
At least they are finally going to get smart and move the check in and lobby to the first floor, queen and
chestnut corner. This hotel never had any street presence. One has to look hard to even know that it's
there! Who knew it had a pool?
They've had a high visible location, and never utilized it! seems like now they will. Hopefully it will spill
over to the rest of the square.
kwf1817
QUOTE(kwf1817 @ May 6 2007, 09:14 PM)
At least they are finally going to get smart and move the check in and lobby to the first floor, queen and
chestnut corner. This hotel never had any street presence. One has to look hard to even know that it's
there! Who knew it had a pool?
They've had a high visible location, and never utilized it! seems like now they will. Hopefully it will spill
over to the rest of the square.
This was an integral part of the late 1960s "Urban Renewal" plan. The expectation was that people would
walk INSIDE the "mall" from the parking garages to the shops.
When the current Brunswick was built, a big chunk of the first floor was taken up by an open public
walkway between Chestnut St. and Lancaster Square; this was not enclosed until many years later. Retail
stores were supposedly of a higher value than a hotel lobby, and indeed there was a bank in the
Brunswick building on N. Queen St. near Chestnut for a number of years. The "shopping mall" between
the Brunswick and the Hess Dept. Store at Queen and Chestnut was expected to be the pedestrian artery
(these "shops" still exist, being used as meeting rooms for the Brunswick). The second and third level of
the "shopping mall" included a large movie theater, later divided into two (this still exists, it is still
vacant).
Originally there were three pedestrian levels connected and surrounding Lancaster Square on all four
sides. There was also parking on the roof level, and it WOULD HAVE BEEN possible to drive from the Duke
St. garage over to the Prince St. garage at the top level! (I don't think it was ever implemented). Of
course this ended when the west side of the "concrete monstrosity" was demolished a few years after it
was completed. The Duke St. ramp to this parking level remained for many years, but was later
demolished to add a few street-level spaces next to the Duke St. parking garage. There are still lines for
parking spaces visible (from inside the Brunswick) on the roof of the movie theater above the "shopping
mall" on the east side of Lancaster Square.
The designers of this project actually expected the second level to be nearly as busy as street level. The
point is, the Brunswick was designed by "urban planners" who thought they knew better than people who
walk the streets. Of course, as we know now, what was once one of the three busiest commercial blocks in
Lancaster City is now a concrete wasteland (and yes, that DOES include Binns Park).
FYI, the Brunswick was originally designed to have two more floors than it does now. Rather than
redesigning the entire building, the top two floors were simply deleted. The structure is strong enough to
add these additional floors.
Page 29 of 38

Page 58 of 142

Artie See
Its time for a little research. Someone needs to pull out the last set of rah-rah articles run in the LNP
when this fine establishment last went from the Hotel Brunswick to the Ramada Brunswick. I do not recall
the year but I certainly recall the content. The owner at the time was going to spend $XX million dollars
then to bring it up to par and turn it around. LNP printed everything that the owner wanted them to print
whether it made any logical sense or not. What happened, more bankruptcy, more management
companies, and more trouble? When the mortgage holder finally got tired of the never ending cycle, they
cut their losses, ate half the debt, and go that asset off of their books to the current owner. Not only did
this story run then but I am sure that it ran in simlar fashion previous to that. What do we have now,
more of the sameoutrageous claims by owners trying to make themselves look good and a newspaper
monopoly that does not even ask questions. Let me suggest a couple. How many dollars per room is
allegedly being spent? How many dollars per room is the national average for new construction of a hotel
such as the Brunswick? What is the difference? How or why could someone substantiate the current claims
for what is merely cosmetic work, no bricks or mortar? I guess it is probably too much to ask though since
LNP was not willing to ask the same questions about the CC & hotel, why would they ask or do any
research for this one?
enlightened176
QUOTE(Artie See @ May 7 2007, 06:32 AM)
This was an integral part of the late 1960s "Urban Renewal" plan. ..... Of course, as we know now, what
was once one of the three busiest commercial blocks in Lancaster City is now a concrete wasteland (and
yes, that DOES include Binns Park).
Artie: Thanks for posting the historical facts of design-intent of this property. Interesting.
Hamid only paid $15 thousand/room for many reasons. 37 years of failure. How sad.
from the article: The Hotel Brunswick stands on a site that has been the location of a lodging facility since
the long-gone Hofnagle Hotel opened there in 1776. The current hotel opened in 1970. It was acquired by
a partnership led by Hamid Zahedi in 2005 for $3.4 million, according to newspaper files.
DimBulb
I was able to confirm that the Brunswick is indeed closed, except for a few rooms on weekends. Most of
the rooms are currently gutted.
The newspaper article is wrong.
Articles Tagged: Brunswick Hotel
Photos
Video
Map
Articles
WHERE LANCASTER BURIED ITS NORTH QUEEN MISTAKE

2008-05-04 00:21:00
CHIP SMEDLEY, Staff
Future explorers traipsing through the brickyards off Harrisburg Pike might believe they've discovered the
ruins of an ancient temple. They will encounter massive columns jutting out of the ground. Delicately
carved stone capitals that topped those columns, freed by soil erosion, peek ......
Downtown high-rise could cost $25M
Page 30 of 38

Page 59 of 142

2008-03-20 12:16:00
BERNARD HARRIS, Staff
Plans for what could be a 10-story or more office, retail, museum, residential and parking garage building
in downtown Lancaster received initial approval Wednesday night. The plans for the proposed building, on
the former Empire TV parking lot at North Queen and East Chestnut streets, would......
Lancaster Square could see start of overhaul as soon as summer
2008-02-27 01:41:00
JENNIFER TODD, Staff
City officials said Tuesday that plans to demolish portions of Lancaster Square are being finalized and
pieces of the concrete eyesore could start coming down this summer.The proposed work would occur on
the east side of the square between the Hotel Brunswick and the Bulova buildin......
City businessman's killing sparks forum
2008-01-04 01:44:00
P.J. REILLY, Staff
Jose Urdaneta has been a Lancaster city councilman for the past two years.During that time, he has been
frustrated by the general lack of interest many city residents have in getting involved in their
community.Thursday night was an exception, he said.The 50 people who turned......
Can candidates dance? You be the judge
2007-10-18 03:16:00
JEFF HAWKES, Staff
Latin music blasted from the nightclub's speakers, and dance instructor Oscar Restrepo, swiveling
smoothly, called out a cadence.Four middle-aged couples on the dance floor stepped and turned to the
up-tempo beat.Rick Calderon had opened his Rumbha nightclub, next to Hotel Bruns......
Lancaster Square: It's a dirty job, but

2007-08-30 02:39:00
JEFF HAWKES, Staff
Maybe Mike Rowe would be up for the job.You might know him as the wisecracking host of "Dirty Jobs" on
the Discovery Channel. One week he's picking up roadkill; the next he's feeling inside a cow for a fetus.
Rowe shows us the people who do these jobs, and he rolls up his sleeves, holds hi......
Hotel Brunswick checks in with downtown upgrades
2007-05-13 00:06:00
JUDY A. STRAUSBAUGH, Political writer
Developers of the $170-million convention center and hotel going up at Penn Square plan a kick-off
celebration this month. Meanwhile, renovation of a landmark hotel in downtown Lancaster is a towering
example of the revitalization momentum created by the convention-center project, say local eco......
Hotel Brunswick aims to meet rising expectations
2007-05-04 12:40:00
TIM MEKEEL
Around the Hotel Brunswick, Kevin Bergman sees a city on the rise. Now it's time for the hotel to join that
movement. The Queen and Chestnut streets landmark has started a renovation costing more than $4
million to invigorate the property. "It's no secret that our product......
14 seek convention center board seat
2007-03-21 01:28:00
Dave Pidgeon, Staff
Fourteen hopefuls have lined up to serve on the Lancaster County Convention Center Authority board,
among them one of the project's fiercest adversaries Ronald Harper Jr.At least half the candidates
seeking the seat have expressed opposition to the convention center and hotel p......
Columbia resident was Ford aide
2006-12-27 14:13:01
Tom Murse
Page 31 of 38

Page 60 of 142
His voice went Boom, boom, boom. He didnt need a microphone. He was a champion, remembers
Kilmer, who is 80 and lives at St. Johns Herr Estate in Columbia. I had never heard him like that before,
Kilmer said in an interview this morning. I said, That man over there is not the man behind......
Witness nabs suspect
2006-12-09 01:34:00
Brett Hambright
A 30-year-old Lancaster city businessman chased and caught a man who was trying to rob a woman
Thursday afternoon, police said.
Matthew Bryant, a salesman for Select Security, was working in his second-story office at 150 N. Queen
St. when he heard the woman's cry for help.
...
A 3-hour bickering brouhaha
2006-08-03 13:46:43
By Jack Brubaker
But the problem wasnt the heat, it was the rigidity. The individual county commissioners, as well as their
packs of ardent supporters, have developed deeply entrenched positions on the proposed downtown
convention center/hotel and other subjects. So on Wednesday morning they talked at not w......
2005-03-17 14:05:27
Tom Murse
All I am saying is if theyre so hell-bent on having a convention center, this is another op......
New owner for Brunswick
2005-01-05 14:27:11
Bernard Harris And John M. Spidaliere
A real estate partnership headed by Hamid Zahedi, a northern New Jersey shopping center owner, is
expected to close on the 221-room hotel at the corner of Queen and Chestnut streets Jan. 31. Zahedi,
reached at his New York office this week, said he plans to renovate the 35-year-old hotel, but his......
Brunswick buy is out for now; 'timing' cited
2004-07-20 13:12:56
John M. Spidaliere
But that doesnt necessarily mean it wont buy the Lancaster Square hotel months from now. With the
threat of a new lawsuit in the air, four members of the authority voted unanimously to terminate
negotiations with the Massachusetts holding company that owns the Ramada Inn Brunswick Hotel, 151
N.......
Authority drops Brunswick deal
2004-07-20 11:18:47
P.j. Reilly
"That deal is dead," said Dave Hixson, executive director of the authority.
Calling the move a "business decision," Ted Darcus, chairman of the authority board, said the authority
wants to focus all its efforts on building a convention center in Penn Square.
"We didn't want......
Convention Center Authority likely to buy Brunswick
2004-07-14 13:50:54
John M. Spidaliere
But the executive director of the Lancaster County Convention Center Authority will wait to make that
recommendation for Monday. It appears from a community standpoint it would be the best course, said
Hixson. The authority will consider extending the due diligence period to buy the Lancast......
Reaction: Brunswick move is unrealistic
Page 32 of 38

2004-06-03 15:12:02
Bernard Harris

Page 61 of 142
"I don't think it could be successful,'' Armstrong, a state senator who represents Lancaster City, said of a
proposal by the Lancaster County Convention Center Authority to buy the Brunswick Hotel in Lancaster
Square and possibly to build a convention center there.
"That's not a first-cla...
AV Specialist has launched a new regional version of the magazine covering the Islamic Republic
of Iran. The magazine uses much of the same editorial and advertising material that appears in
the Middle East edition but the Arabic content is replaced with Farsi content and an additional
section provides news and information on technologies and productions specifically relevant to
Iran. Local content is managed by Pejman Ghorbani, a young Iranian filmmaker based in Tehran.
The magazine is distributed through the Nashravaran Journalistic Institute in Tehran and is
available on subscription - as well as through newsstands and specialist retail outlets in Iran.
The indigenous film industry in the Islamic Republic of Iran is booming and home-grown
programming dominates local cinema and television, explains publisher Kevan Jones. Over the
last few years weve seen a growing interest in our magazine from readers within the Islamic
Republic of Iran and our new regional version reflects the importance of this market within the
Middle East region.
Much of the editorial content in this new version has been commissioned from local journalists
and is specifically relevant to the region. For many years Iran has been isolated by language,
culture and political intrigue, says Nima Abu-Wardeh, a well-known media professional in the
Middle East and presenter of the BBCs weekly Middle East Business Report. Despite this, the
Iranian economy is buoyant and the country is playing an increasingly important role in the
commercial activity of the Middle East. Equally important, Iran has a well-established culture of
cinema and film production thats hungry for information on the latest video technologies. AV
Specialists new Farsi-language edition is likely to provide real value to film and TV professionals
in the Republic.
The first issue features several international manufacturers of film and TV production technology
keen to expose their products in this fast-growing market. The television and pro-video markets
in Iran represent a significant portion of our revenues in the Middle East but weve often found it
difficult to communicate with our customers in the Republic, says Robin Hood from Panasonic
Broadcast in the Middle East. AV Specialists new Farsi edition provides us an opportunity to reach
our customers and address them in a manner thats uniquely relevant to them.
The Nashravaran Journalistic Institute is confident that the latest offering from AV Specialist will be
a resounding success in the Iranian market. AV Specialist is the first and only broadcast and
pro-AV magazine to be distributed in the Islamic Republic of Iran, says Hamid Zahedi, managing
director of the Institute. It provides information thats just not available through any other
source and the fact that the magazine includes Persian content makes it uniquely relevant to our
market.
For US companies, trade with Iran is still off-limits but a powerful anti-sanctions lobby has
emerged in the US and the publishers are hopeful that the US trade embargo will soon be
relaxed. The US Dept. of Treasury does not prohibit the export of publications or informational
material to Iran, explains Kevan Jones, and even though the trade embargo remains in place,
the Iranian market presents an interesting opportunity for US manufacturers who see free trade
as the inevitable outcome of US foreign policy.
The first copies of the new Farsi-language version appeared in June 2005 but the publishers are
planning a major launch to coincide with the Tehran Short Film Festival taking place from 15-20
November.
Page 33 of 38

Page 62 of 142
Two squares beat as one

The fortunes of Lancaster Square are tied to those of Penn Square, according to the owner of Hotel
Brunswick. Hamid Zahedi wrote Wednesday that his hotel, based at Lancaster Square, could be renovated
to "four-diamond/four-star" quality, and its two-story concrete annex transformed into "two or three
restaurants ... plus entertainment for persons in their 30s and older."
Zahedi outlined his vision Wednesday in a letter to Lancaster County
Article 2 of 17, 677490000000.874098

A 3-hour bickering brouhaha
Lancaster County government approached total meltdown Wednesday - one of the hottest days of the
year. But the problem wasn't the heat, it was the rigidity.
The individual county commissioners, as well as their packs of ardent supporters, have developed deeply
entrenched positions on the proposed downtown convention center/hotel and other subjects.
So on Wednesday morning they talked at - not with - each other for nearly three hours.
Jane Albright of East Lampeter
Article 3 of 17, 812695

Fireworks essential for downtown event
Will "Celebrate Lancaster!" the city's popular Fourth of July celebration that's held downtown, end with a
bang or a whimper this year? That's a question for Mayor Rick Gray, who is studying whether the loud and
rumbling fireworks finale risks serious damage to historic homes, churches and other buildings or is a
particularly dangerous fire hazard.
A number of people think it is both.
They're primarily from the
Article 4 of 17, 807912

Published on February 28, 2006, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Fireworks under fire
For the past eight years, Independence Day in Lancaster has meant vendors in the streets, open-air shows
downtown and fireworks over the Greist Building.
For some, however, it also has meant falling embers, rattling windows and structural damage.
Lancaster city residents tonight will get the chance to debate the merits of the annual fireworks display.
"The public ought to know about the attendant problems," Mayor Rick Gray said of the city's annual
Page 34 of 38

Page 63 of 142
Article 5 of 17, 802337

Published on February 15, 2006, Lancaster New Era (PA)
Will fireworks move again?
Within a few months of taking office eight years ago, Lancaster's new Mayor Charlie Smithgall announced
plans for a Fourth of July celebration that would light up the sky.
The dazzling fireworks display at six times the cost of the annual Long's Park concert event could be
seen from suburbs a dozen miles away.
But it was the estimated 20,000 people who came downtown that were the most important to Smithgall.
His goal was to bring
Article 6 of 17, 777415

Published on December 19, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Rep. Pitts leads fight to derail slots parlor
A developer of the proposed slot-machine parlor in downtown Lancaster said Sunday more developments
related to the project could be announced as early as this week.
Also, local leaders and U.S.
Rep.
Joseph Pitts are expected to convene today at Lancaster County Courthouse with the aim of developing
strategies to kill the $150 million project proposed for the Bulova Technologies building.
"To develop a consensus on a game plan and to work together" is how
Article 7 of 17, 752947

Maybe Lancaster Square needs an exorcism
I've begun to wonder whether a curse has been placed on Lancaster Square.
Could it be that the ghosts of the original Brunswick Hotel, the old Lancaster YMCA and the Grand Theater
flattened by the wrecking ball in the 1960s to make way for so-called progress have gotten back at
us for our folly?
When it comes to Lancaster Square, it's almost eerie the way we can't get our act together. The paralysis
is maddening,
Article 8 of 17, 751343

Page 35 of 38

Page 64 of 142
City, county take new looks at Lancaster Sq.

Lancaster city and county officials, recently at odds over projects in the city, are separately pushing for
new plans to revamp the east side of Lancaster Square, which has been widely criticized for being little
more than a concrete eyesore.
Mayor Charlie Smithgall said Sunday he has asked Hunter Interests Inc. of Maryland to submit a revised
edition of its 2002 Lancaster Square Master Plan and expects to hear from it this week.
Hunter's original vision was to put the
Article 9 of 17, 729333

A green gem sparkles in center city
Wearing a knowing smile, John Hershey stood amid a crowd of about 300 people this morning for the
official opening of Lancasters Binns Park. The fountain he and his team at Derck & Edson, the Lititz
architectural firm, designed bubbled and hummed nearby. I feel like an expectant father, said Hershey.
It is exciting after years of planning to come to this point. The crowd of dignitaries and city and county
Article 10 of 17, 719830

The signs they are a-changin
Quantifying the oft-mentioned economic development created by Clipper Magazine Stadium isnt easy, but
Lisa Riggs has a suggestion. Riggs, director of the James Street Improvement Project, said you can see
things are looking up in the northwest section of the city simply by, well, looking up. If nothing else, signs
above businesses in the area, like A Homerun Location, Sluggers Pizza, and
Published on July 13, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)
The Brunswicks new Taste
THE WEEKLY DISH By E. Martin HulseJIM SWITZENBERG AND RON PFEIFFER have brought a new taste to
town. Taste at the Brunswick (151 N. Queen St., Lancaster, 397-4800) will open for dinner Friday with
eclectic city food, says Switzenberg, director of operations for Taste Catering, which recently partnered
with the Brunswick Hotel, owned by Hamid Zahedi. Tim Olivett, a Tavern on the Green and Moshulu alum,
was hired as chef, which returns the Hempfield graduate to the
Article 12 of 17, 10239134

Published on May 22, 2005, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)
New look,hours for Brunswick eatery
Page 36 of 38

Page 65 of 142
The restaurant and bar in the historic downtown Hotel Brunswick is receiving a facelift.
Since the hotel was bought by Hamid Zahedi in February, the lounge and bar was closed and the
restaurant was only open for breakfast, mainly for hotel customers.
The lounge and bar reopened this weekend to the public with new paint and carpeting, and will be
completely renovated within the next two weeks with a new bar, dining and lounge furniture. Additionally,
lunch and brunch are expected to open
Article 13 of 17, 10235743

Brunswick owner seeks to revive movie house
The new owner of the Ramada Inn Brunswick is proposing to revitalize a portion of Lancaster Square into a
movie/performing arts theater.
But before Hamid Zahedi of New York begins, he wants to see more people invest in entertainment
attractions downtown, said a consultant during a press conference Tuesday on the square.
Thomas DePaul of the DePaul Group of Lancaster said he was hired by Zahedi to develop the project at the
former Eric Theater, located next to the Brunswick.
DePaul
Article 14 of 17, 10232443

The new owners of Hotel Brunswick are trying to take advantage of the apparent failure of the planned
$129 million Penn Square hotel and convention center.
"All I am saying is if they're so hell-bent on having a convention center, this is another
Article 15 of 17, 10225298

Published on January 9, 2005, Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)
CATCHING UP ON THE NEWS
SUNDAY
Jan. 2 - Richard M. Scott, a World War II fighter pilot and a former mayor of Lancaster, died at 86. Scott
was shot down in combat and escaped from a German prisoner of war camp. He led the move to bring
minor-league baseball back to Lancaster. A memorial service Thursday was attended by hundreds.
MONDAY
Jan. 3 - James H. Guerin, sentenced in 1992 for his admission that he ran a $1.14 billion contract scam
Page 37 of 38

Page 66 of 142
and $50 million smuggling ring involving his business, ISC, and its
Article 16 of 17, 10225024

Published on January 6, 2005, Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster, PA)
Brunswick to change hands
The Ramada Inn Brunswick will soon have a new owner.
Hamid Zahedi, a northern New Jersey shopping center owner, said he and a group of partners are close to
finalizing a deal for the 221-room hotel. He said the purchase price is less than $3 million.
The tax assessment on the 1-acre property is $4.25 million, but Zahedi said the hotel requires significant
renovation, and the purchase price reflects the condition of the building.
"We'll have to fix
Article 17 of 17, 10224984

Published on January 5, 2005, Lancaster New Era (PA)
New owner for Brunswick
New York businessman buying Lancaster Square hotel, plans renovations.
The Ramada Inn Brunswick will soon have a new owner.
A real estate partnership headed by Hamid Zahedi, a northern New Jersey shopping center owner, is
expected to close on the 221-room hotel at the corner of Queen and Chestnut streets Jan. 31.
Zahedi, reached at his New York office this week, said he plans to renovate the 35-year-old hotel, but his
plans for the hotel and its annex along Lancaster Square are still undetermined.
"A lot of our plans are in limbo, because
Page 38 of 38
Page 67 of 142
Advisory, Inc.
11, 1755 Oregon Pike
Lancaster, PA 17601
717-569-4100
FINANCIAL Y A I U l i E M E N I GIOUC 1 1 0
PRESIDENT
By: stan caterbone
Page 1 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 68 of 142
Page 2 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 69 of 142
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SONY JOINTcVENTUREPROPOSAL
"SONY CHALLENGE"
SONY JOINT VENTURE STATISTICS
INVESTOR MARKETING MATERIALS
LEGAL DOCUMENTATION
SCREEN PLAY (1ST DRAFT)
Page 3 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 70 of 142
THE DIGITAL MOWE

A Joint Venture Proposal for
The Sony Organization
Developed by:
Stan J. Caterbone
Representing:
Tony Bongiovi
Power Station Studios
Flatbush Films
Garnillion Studios
Advanced Media Group, Ltd.,
beated in May ~f 1987
Page 4 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 71 of 142
SONY CORPORATION
INTRODUCTION
SONY'S ROLE
TIMING
MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
FINANCIAL STRUCTURE
Page 5 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 72 of 142
INTRODUCTION
Tony Bongiovi and Power Station Studio are undertaking a project
that has the potential of revolutionizing the entertainment industry.
In the next few pages of this proposal, I will outline the elements
involved and how Sony can participate in this landmark event.
The technology of the recording industry has been advancing by
leaps and bounds. We have seen the advances from monaural
long playing record to stereo record to compact disc. Now we are
seeing tape systems that use digital rather than analog signals
appear, matching the quality of compact discs. What has
happened to the theatre's? The audio portion of a film, is as
responsible for the sensations one experiences at a motion picture
as the visual, yet many theatre's are still equipped only for mono
sound. Why is this? We feel there are two basic reasons.
1>
The relative high cost of upgrading a theatre to be able to

incorporate the advanced technologies of the audio
industry.
2> The lack of proper equipment for the film industry to

produce high quality digital audio tracks.
These two problems should not be addressed separately. There
is little motivation for upgrading until the product is available and
even less motivation to produce a product that can not be heard.
Tony Bongiovi and Ed Evans at Power Station in New York, have
now made it possible to address these problems simultaneously.
Their creation of the new "Power Station Digital Movie Sound"
(PSDMS), will not only enable the film industry to produce the
highest quality audio tracks for film, but will also allow theatre's to
upgrade their existing sound system at a minimal cost.
To introduce this revolutionary new sound, Bongiovi is in the
process of producing a film entitled "Mutant Mania", which is a
science fiction action horror film, shot in a small ocean resort town
in New Jersey. This film has many elements that make it perfect
for the introduction of PSDMS. The most prevalent of these being
Page 6 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 73 of 142
the heavy music score by Bongiovi's latest band "French Lick".

Producing bands is definitely one of Bongiovi's fortes. Bongiovi
was instrumental in creating "Bon Jovi" who is probably the
strongest force in the rock and roll circuit today. "Bon Jovi's" third
album "Slippery When Wet", has sold more copies in a short
period of time than any other band in history.
Another is the fact that this is a horror film. The use of audio in
horror films is important to create tension, fear, excitement etc..
Using a horror film also lessens the influence the critics have on
the audience.
By the large this film will stand on it's own merits. Now add
PSDMS, and you have a potential block buster event.
How does Sony fit into all of this?
SONY'S ROLE
What we are seeking to do, is establish a distribution route in
which the message of Sony's new technology and its benefits can
be more easily and directly passed on to the consumer.
Picture a one or two minute commentary at the beginning of the

movie and home video, demonstrating the difference between the
quality of theatrical sound now and the new SONY/PSDMS sound.
This does two things. First, by demonstrating the difference in
quality of the new sound, you reinforce in the audiences mind that
it is much better, which as you will hear, there is little doubt.
Secondly it reinforces in the audience that Sony truly is a pioneer
of advanced innovative technologies.
In addition to the commentary, Sony will receive credits on the film,
ie. SONY/PSDMS. We will include in the copyright agreement that
Sony equipment must be used to be SONY/PSDMS.
Page 7 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 74 of 142
Sony's name will also be strategically placed throughout the film.

This may be done in the form of billboards, advertisements, or
Sony equipment being utilized.
A commercial may be developed for n/ promoting both the film
and Sony's contributions to advanced audio techniques in the film
industry. This could be done as a joint venture between Sony and
the distribution company for the theatrical and video exhibition.
Inside every video tape that is sold, a coupon may be placed to
promote Sony products.
A full line of quality equipment may be SONY/POWER STATION
labeled for consumer use to enhance marketability of Sony
entertainment products.
Sony Video Software Corporation will receive right of first refusal
on all contracts for video and theatrical distribution. We will allow
Sony a preferred 5% margin under any other distributor for a
competitive edge.
TIMING
Timing is crucial in a project that touch so many different
areas.
MARKETING1DISTRIBUTION
Most of the industry by their own admission is at least two years
away from an effort to upgrade the sound in movie theatres. With
the SONY/PSDMS system, other companies may adapt easily and
economically to produce products with digital movie sound. With
companies adapting to this process, the future should see the
prominence of the SONY/PSDMS insignia much the same as you
see the Dolby insignia today. This will act as a constant reminder
Page 8 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 75 of 142
to the public that Sony truly is a pioneer of advanced audio visual

technologies.
Sony will receive exposure in the professional market place by
having the SONY/POWER STATION equipment used in theatres
and studios to produce the SONY/PSDMS sound.
The video industry is a 56 billion dollar industry that is in need of
product. When you look at the potential for a product that will be
one of the first feature films to compliment the fast paced
VCR/Stereo Entertainment components, with a musical score that
may have enough merits of its own, you have an amazing potential
for distribution.
The Digital and Disc Industry has proven to be the future standard
for recording and playing. Because of the relative newness of the
digital format, there are more people who have yet to experience
the digital sound. With the high exposure that will come from this
project, this could be the first time ever people hear digital. How
many people? 1 - 10 - 50 - 100 million?
What will be their first reaction? I need to buv a Disc Plaver!
Who's name will they think of first? SONYIPSDMS!
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
Bongiovi and Evans at Power Station have developed a
revolutionary hybrid mixing console to penetrate the video post
production market. This console was developed to enable
engineers to produce high quality audio tracks for the film industry
as well as the recording industry. This new console utilizes an
automation system that can be used by both industries. This new
console is especially atractive to the film industry, as it will greatly
reduce production costs since mixing costs in a recording studio
are much less. At present the console that is being used is a
bastardized system that utilizes components from many different
pieces of equipment, from a number of different companies, of
Page 9 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 76 of 142
which Sony is one. Because we already have a working model of

this console, it would take very little time for a finished product to
be manufactured that could carry the SONY name.
The other piece of equipment that is essential to the PSDMS
process, is the box that enables the laser disc to automatically
read the synchronization track encoded on the film. This piece of
equipment can be produced at an extremely low cost. It is this
low cost and the fact that the theatres will not have to replace their
present projectors that make digital movie sound a reality in 1988.
We feel that with consumers demanding the same quality audio at
theatres, as they have become accustomed to with their home
entertainment systems, theatre owners will have little problem
investing the nominal amount of dollars involved, to upgrade their
theatres for digital audio. This investment could be as low as
$1000. With the cost being so low, the distribution company may
want to consider bearing the burden of this cost, if the theatre
owners agree to show Bongiovi's next three films.
FINANCIAL STRUCTURE
SONY will commit four million dollars for the production of
Bongiovi's film to be released in 1988.
We would like SONY to commit fifteen million for three to four
future products that will follow the same format as the first, so that
Bongiovi and SONY will position themselves as the pioneer and
leaders in the industry. This will not allow competition to gain
access to the marketplace until we are all firmly situated and
profitable.
Sony will only pay for expenses to produce 60 second spots.
Tony and Power Station will utilize any and all services to help
produce the spot and will allow reimbursement for only true costs
with no mark up including all of Tony's time which will be free.
Page 10 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 77 of 142
Power Station and Power Productions I will receive a negotiated

percentage from all revenues generated from the merchandizing
campaign of the SONY/POWER STATION products and the sale
that may result to other film studios utilizing Sony/POWER
STATION equipment in the PSDMS System.
We will receive four deluxe entertainment systems - Television,
VCR, Stereo, Etc. that is top of the line to help during the
production of the film.
The purpose of the above and all aspects of this Proposal is to let
the separate entities involved maximize their profits for their
respective talents; Bongiovi in film and music production and Sony
in manufacturing and distribution of equipment and merchandise
and later video and film distribution.
Page 11 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 78 of 142
I THE MIGHTY YEN AND FIERCE COMPETITION ARE FORCING IT INTO NEW MARKETS
here he is, sitting on the floor of

his office with three remote controls in his hand, listening to a
Beethoven symphony a t high volume.
He recorded the symphony from a
broadcast of a recent Vienna Philharmonic concert in Tokyo, and now he's
putting the tape to good use. As much
as he likes music, Akio Morita likes trying out new stereo gear even better.
Morita is 66, and the last flecks of
black long ago vanished from his silver
hair. Although he's spending less time
@ these days in his cluttered, wood-paneled
chairman's office a t Sony Corp., it's
" clear
that Morita still provides much of
64 BWSINES W
E 1,1987'
the spark that has made the company

synonymous with the success of postwar
Japan: innovation, shrewd marketing,
and quality. As executives repeatedly
dash in for consultations, Morita patiently explains why one set of speakers he's
checking out doesn't quite have the Sony
sound.
Sony. The very name speaks volumes
about the company. It comes not from a
Japanese word that foreigners might
find W u l t to pronounce, but from
sonus, the Latin word for sound, fine
tuned for Japanese tongues. The name
symbolizes the company's origins in its
pioneering tape recorders and transistor
'
radios. I t also has come to signify the

international orientation among so many
mightjly successful Japanese companies.
Some 70% of Sony's sales come from
outside Japan.
~
D DOWN.
E
Recently, though, Sony
has become one of the most visible symbols of trouble in Japan. Like other Jap
anese companies in businesses ranging
from autos and steel to electronics and
computers, Sony's world has been
turned upside down. The dramatic rise
of the yen has cramped its ability to
compete in export markets. Protectionist
sentiment is growing in the U. S. and
COVER STORY
Page 12 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 79 of 142
back like never before. Far East competitors, such as Taiwan and South Korea,
are exploiting their lower costs, and
U. S. and European companies are
achieving efficiency gains and improvements in quality.
The high yen--endaka in Japaneseis slamming the nation's exporters two
ways. Foreign competitors with costs d e
nominated in dollars or French francs
have more room to undercut Japanese
companies on prices, and a dollar's
worth of sales is worth less in yen. Measured in dollars, Sony's U. S. sales rose
24% last year. Measured in yen, they
were down 11%. "The falling dollar has
produced a nearly 50% tax on us," complains Morita.
Overall, the numbers tell a disappointing story. Worldwide sales slipped ?%, to
$82 billion, in the fiscal year that ended
last October, while earnings from operations fell a stunning 75%. Earnings declined another 56% for the five months
ended in March from a year earlier.
Archrival Matsushita Electric Industrial
Co., by contrast, endured a more manageable 44% drop in operating earnings
last year.
For Sony, endaka is like a drought
that follows a plague of locusts. The
challenges facing Morita and his handpicked president, former opera singer
Norio Ohga, have become even more
daunting than they already were.
BETA ~ O C K Competition
.
m consumer
electronics is brutal. After coming up
with such hits as W i n TVS and
Wallanan tape players, Sony watched
the hottest market of the 1980s,pass it
by. The company dung to its Betamax
videorecorder fmmaturhile +hp
the world switched to VAS. That s
s
was costly, and the experience helped
embolden competitors. They no longer
wait to see whether Sony's innovative
products suceeed. Rivals that took about
two years to come up with their own
U. S. versions of the Walkman now r e
spond to new Sony products in months.
And the rising quality of competitors'
products has narrowed the advantage
that once permitted the company to
build a successful advertising campaign
around the simple phrase: "It's a Sony."
To make matters worse, some of the
most troublesome competitors are in
South Korea or other Asian countries
where costs are lower.
Sony has fought back. Shortly after
becoming president in 1982, Ohga set a
goal of reducing Sony's dependence on
consumer electrbnics by getting 50% of
sales from nonconsumer products by
1990, compared with 15% a t the time.
Ohga has also served notice that executives a t Sony factories must cut manufacturing costs beyond the 10% annual
reductions of recent years. 'We need
quantum leaps in cost reduction," he
...
AND DlVERSlFlCATlOH
...ERODES
A STROW6 YEN
IS OFF SCHEDULE
EARNINGS.. .
'
35
- - - -
10-
'0
- - - - -
NONCONSUMER PRODUCTS
AS PERCENT OF TOTAL SALES
'82
'83
'84
'85
'86
J
DATA. M l l Y CQI.
says. To reduce its vulnerability to fluctuations in the yen and to become more
responsive to its customers, Sony is expanding its substantial manufacturing
operations overseas. And Sony clings almost defiantly to one. of the company's
most distinguishing characteristics: a research and development budget that
amounts to about Wo of sales. Rival Matsusfiita spends only 4%.
Even for a company as innovative as
Sony, the changes are not coming easily.
"Our people are working very hard,"
says Morita. And all 'that hard work is
carrying Sony into some unfamiliar territory, where the risk of missteps is
high. The company's push into nonconsumer areas, such as computers and image processing, has been such tough going that Sony will not meet its timetable
for diversification.
Other changes Could be even more
traumatic. In some areas, Sony is abandoning its time-honored, go-it-alone philosophy. It is sharing its technology with
other companies, for example, in an effort to create industry standards for
new products and to avoid another Betamax. Sony is also becoming more of a
street fighter. It is pushing harder for
larger shares of the markets for products, even if it means paring profit mar-
COVER STORY
Page 13 of 76
BUSINESS WEEKIJUNE 1,1987 6S
2
8
e
$
k
3
-1
05.03.2007
Page 80 of 142
the company has avoided any serious

damage from the cross-fire between Tokyo and Washington. Its semiconductors
pany, which has 701 employees, is one

among a host of small regional s&
brewers in Japan. Morita & Co. also
makes miso, a fermented soybean
paste used in soups and sauces, and
shogu, or soy sauce. Under the management of Kyueaemon Morita, the
business provided a comfortable life
for his son Akio and three other children in Nagoya, an industrial city 224
m i southwest of Tokyo.
As the eldest son, Akio was expected
to take over Morita & Co. Instead, after World War 11, Morita, then 25,
threw in his lot with business novices
Masaru Ibuka and Tamon Maeda to
start Tokyo Tsushin Kogyo, or Tokyo
Telecommunications Engineering Co.
Unable to get a bank loan for their
struggling company, the trio turned to
Akio's father, who repeatedly provided
money through Morita & Co. in return
for stoek in the new venture.
AT worn r e ~ o ~
~ TaK evolved into
Sony. And Morita & Co., with Akio's
brother Kuzuaki a t the helm, has seen
some modest transformations of its
chief are legion. Even though Congress

in April rejected a oneyear ban on the
ultrahigh-fidelity digital tape recorders
recently introduced in Japan, legislators
are likely to accomplish the same objective by other means. Congress is dawdling over legislation to require that the
new products be equipped with devices
that prevent them from duplicating
tapes or records, a provision sought by
the recording industry. Richard L.
Sharp, president of Circuit City Stores
Inc., isn't expecting digital tape machines to be in his stores for a t least a
year, as Sony and other manufacturers
await a clear reading on the legislation.
Despite Sony's woes, Morita is as eager and enthusiastic as ever. He manages to sound upbeat about both the
company's functional-looking, high-performance Profeel Pro TV,which is selling well, and the 8mm handheld video
camera, which is struggling. "This year
we will recover our profits, and next
year will be a much better year," he
says. Most analysts agree that Sony has
a t least halted the slide that has
COVER STORY
Page 14 of 76
05.03.2007

-
--
Page 81 of 142
Page 15 of 76
BUSINESS WEEKfJUNE 1,198797

05.03.2007
- -
ers, and by the time he left for Berlin to

study voice, Morita signed him on as a
consultant. After rebuffing several entreaties by Morita to forsake his opera
career for a full-time position at Sony,
Ohga finally relented in 1959. Before b e
ing named president, however, he served
a 23-year apprenticeship that included
running Sony's tape recorder division
and a record company joint venture with
CBS Inc.
ow THE STUMP. Ohga's growing authority allows Morita more freedom for the
ambassadorial role he loves so much. He
spends about a third of his time a t Sony
these days. The rest is devoted to trips
overseas for such things as speechmaking or promoting his book, Made in Japan, and to his ceremonial functions in
Japan. Last year he became a vice-chairman of Keidanren, the Japacese federation of economic organizations.
For all his outside activities, Morita
still makes sure he gets involved in the
crucial decisions a t Sony. When it came
time to price the portable compact disk
player, for example, Morita decreed that
it be priced a t less than 50,000 yen,
about $200 a t the time. Even though the
player cost more than that to make then,
Morita correctly anticipated that the low
price eventually would generate enough
sales to provide the volume production
that would trigger economies of scale-and profits. The episode shows how
Sony is now pursuing market share
more diligently. I t is also an example of
how Sony is responding to its experience
with Betamax, the world's first home
videorecorder. This high-profile product
laid bare the company's strengths and
its weaknesses.
As conceived, Betamax was a classiciflustration of Sony's founding philosophy of looking for new markets where
bigger, wellestablished companies were
not a threat. The company correctly
foresaw the immense latent demand for
a machine that could make and play
back home videotapes. But then it ceded
the market to others by refusing to yield
when the VHS format, -first developed by
Victor Co. of Japan, provided longer r e
cording times and gradually became the
industry standard. Sony still insists that
its Beta recorders provide a superior picture. But a shrinking number of customers-currently about 5% of all buyersare buying Beta.
MlDuFe CRISIS? Some analysts think Betamax goes a long way toward explaining the new directions a t Sony. "The
Beta experience was so searing, so
threatening, that it forced a major revision in the way the company positions
itself," says James C. Abegglen, a Tokyo-based management consultant. One
example: Sony has relaxed its tradition
of sticking to the expensive, high-profit
end of the market by coming out with a
COVER
STORY MEDIA GROUP
ADVANCED
Page 82 of 142
ing," says Neil Vander Dussen, president of Sony Corp. of America.

The efforts in the U. S. and around
the world are producing some pieces of
Sony's vision of the future. Sony was
the first Japanese company with a powerful 32-bit desktop computer, which is
the heart of its engineering workstation.
It has quickly become a major producer
of full-feature telephones in Japan. Sony
also has taken the lead with the 3%-in.
floppy disks and drives that are bidding
to replace 5%-in. disks as standard
equipment on computers.
Perhaps the most impressive marriage
of video with the computer is what Sony
calls interactive video. Sterling Drug
Inc.'s Winthrop Pharmaceuticals unit
uses a van with a customcrafted version
to provide simulated demonstrations of
how its products work. The system lets
a doctor "treat" a patient with heart
failure. The doctor sees his patient going
to the emergency room, while the system provides the patient's case history
and vital signs. The patient's recovery
depends on the doctor's response to onscreen questions and choices.
one of the reasons
sales, executives now concede their time

ers of the disks themselves.
sharing technology and
2
P
eE
.8BVSlNESS WEEKIJUNE 1,1987
COVER STORY
Page 16 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 83 of 142
Such a move would send a strong signal that Sony has reached a new, more
mature phase of development after riding the crest of Japan's postwar economic miracle. In essence, Sony's tradition of
searching for gaps is another way of
seeking market niches-a classic approach for young companies. To keep
growing, bigger companies must also
learn to defend their existing markets
while broadening their product line.
Mastering new skills is never easy. But
Morita, now an inveterate skier, didn't
even try the slopes until he was 60.
There's no reason Sony can't accomplish
a similar feat in the business world.
against the dollar since September, 1985,

Sony was able to raise prices only about
15% in the U. S.
Moving plants overseas is only the
first step. The more difficult task will be
to integrate planning and research and
design internationally, too. But if an international staff is any measure, Sony is
well along in the integration process. Of
7,000 employees in the U. S., for example, only 150 are Japanese. Sony, virtually alone among Japanese companies, has
stuck to a policy of giving the top job in
its foreign operations to a local national.
Before long, it may become the first major Japanese company to name a foreigner as a director. A leading candidate
is Jack Schmuckli, the head of Sony's
European operations.
a strong yen. Even though having large

overseas sales makes Sony more vulnerable than most Japanese industrials, it is
already among the most international of
companies. Foreigners own 23% of its
stock, which is traded on 23 exchanges
around the world. Sony also moved early
and fast into local manufacturing. It
makes TV sets in Bridgend, Wales, as
well as in San Diego. It makes compact
disks in Terre Haute, Ind., and in Salzburg, Austria. All told, 20% of Sony's
manufacturing is overseas. It aims to
increase that to 35% by 1990. Such globalization will help Sony earn its revenues
and pay its bills in the same currency,
rather than paying workers in yen and
logging sales in a depreciating dollar.
While the yen was appreciating 50%
By Larry Armstrong i n Tokyo, with

Christopher Power and G. David Wallace
in New York
OHSOWE: EVERYTHING FROM A $32 BOX tO A $450 RECORDER WlIM-T
f all the problems besetting

Sony, the two most frustrating
are how to deal with copycat
competitors and how to mute the imp a d of the rising yen on manufadur
ing costs. But Sony has shown it can
rise to the challenge. Its experience
with the Walkman is proof of that
After Walkman's debut in July, 1979,
Sony was not about to bask in the new
product's almost instant success. Within months, Sony audio engineer Kozo
Ohsone was heading a team trying to
come up with a better Walkman. Ohsone carved a block of wood that was
25% smaller than the okiginal design
and gave it to his engineers as a model.
The engineers grumbled, but they
buckled down. By February, 1981,
Sony was shipping thousands of Walkmans that were smaller, sounded betr
ter, and had nearly 50% fewer parts
than Walkman I.
1
O ' E R STORY
lion of the 27 million Walkrnans it has

made, prices run from a plain-vanilla
playback-only model for $32 to a
souped-up $449.95 version that boasts
tapedeckquality sound and records as
well as plays.
Sony has used its image as a technology leader to gain a hammerlock on
the lucrative premium end of the market. Walkman is the only portable ste
reo offered by the tony L. L. Bean mtalog. Emphasizing that it is "made by
Sony in Japan, like 'Mercedes Benz,
made in Germany"' gives Walkman
"intangible added value," says Ohsone,
now audio group director.
p u n n o FOR KEEPS. All Walkman
products are manufactured in Japan.
And despite the soaring yen, Walkman
production is the exception to Sony's
strategy to move more production
overseas. Even though the soaring yen
squeezed profits, Sony says it still
made money on the $432 million worth
of Waikmans it sold last year. One reason: a decision four years ago to create
a low-price model specifically for the
U. S. That forced Sony to automate
production drastically and design a
new model that cut more than 90% off
production costs partly by integrating
the playing mechanism onto the printi
ed circuit board. The basic $32 Walkman has become Sony's bestiselling
model in the U. S.
Analysts think Walkman's go-go
gears are coming to an end. But Sony
disagrees. "Of the 4 billion people in
the world, we estimate we could reach
600 million," says Ohsone. That may be
an overstatement But then, as long as
Sony keeps gripding out new versions,
there seems to be no shortage of people eager to tune in.
SOUND
Sony continues to dominate the $1.3

billion buslness with a 30% share of
personal tape players sold worldwide.
The reason: "It has been more inventive than the others," says stock analyst Alan BeU of Salomon Brothers
Asia Ltd. Walkman firsts include
Dolby noise reduction in 1982 and a
rechargeable battery in 1986.
Sony's inventiveness shows in more
than technology. To keep Walkman
fresh and to make it appealing to more
customers, Sony churns out new models to suit virtually every taste and
wallet. So far it has introduced about
100. Headed for the beach? Take the
solar-powered, waterproof Walkman.
Tennis, anyone? Here's an ultralight
radio-only model that attaches to a
sweatband. Want concertihall sound?
Slip on the oversize headphones of a
deluxe Boodo Khan. In the U.S.,
where Sony has sold more than 13 mil-
By Amy B
I
Page 17 of 76
in Tokyo
E5
11 #z
BUSINESS WEEKIJUNE 1,1987 68

05.03.2007
Page 84 of 142
STATISTICS FOR SONY DEAL

1.
Power Station
1% $1 Million in 1987 in Revenues
I. Bon Jovi Tony's creation
a. Format
b. Mixing
Sold 9 million albums in 6 months
2. Power Station Hiah Tech Award Last 4 Years

Best in World By Peers!
3. 4 5 Grammys in 1987 Recorded there Steve Winwood

Others: Jagger,, B. Joel, Springsteen, Diana Ross, Madonna,
J. Lennon, on and on.
4. Tony
- Multi Track Recording
Defied Theory
Designed Sound Voyeger
Produced Star Wars Album Mixed
5. French Lick MTV may sign Free Promotion

II. Technology
1. First Video, film, tv in digital. All first for full entertainment
2. Kodak and Mitsubish Not till end of Decade
3. Dolby Sony/PSDMS
- $10,000 per license to any tv, film, video, etc.
4. Only mix board that will mix albums/video's
Sell to all recording and film studios $300,000
- $500,000 per
console.
5.
Sony spends 9% of gross revenue on R & D

9% of billions 2 = $180,000,000
6. Put Sony 5 years ahead of strategic plan
Disc players Only 23% of consumers currently own a disc player.

First time to hear for how many?
Page 18 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 85 of 142
Filmpideo
1. 23,000 theaters to sell system
2. First will sell movie and video

Add French Lick
3. Top Gun sold 9 million @ $30.00

$270,000,000
- $60.00 per video
4. Horror International Fihn $20 $60,000,000
Pay N,Cable, N ?
IV.
Commercial 180 Sec Commentary
- $8,000,000 for commercial

Visa Demonstration $2 Million - $6 Million
Sony $4,000,000
Pepsi Paid $8,000,000 60 Second in front of "Top Gun" video.
V. Merchandise Private Label

Power Station Beach Line
In movie, free by original designer and owner
- "Hana Ten" swim wear
Power Station Electronics Line/Sony

Best recording in world
- is it good?
Beach Accessories
Promotion in movie, video,
Sell all of above

Video
- Mail Order, Stores
VI. Sony
I. Needs help
a. Low profits
b. Beta Bust
2. Best name electronics Manufacture
Page 19 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 86 of 142
3. Film and video distribution (new)

4. Willing to work together
a. Share tech
b. Joint venture
c. Horizontal distribution
5. Horror Elements and PIS name already international
Deal would involve:
I. Retail electronics division
2. Professional electronic
3. Film distribution
4. Video distribution
Star Wars $2 Billion in 10 Years from all

revenues
30% 50% = $600,000,000

Tony said 50/50
All costs $4 Million
New Film studio?/with Sony

Deal worth 100,000,000 Now??
Would Kodak or Mitsubish like deal?
Will Sony let this deal go to competition?
No Beta
PERFECT ENDING: Profits and Respect
ereation 4111/87
11:00
'
- 1:00 a.m.
Stan 98%
1% Scott Call Ron Gell

Research Sony
Page 20 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 87 of 142
1% Marcia Sony give 4 million
Raise 15 Million
Call Head of video distribution
Merchandising Hang Ten Off

Kodak
Sony
Difference test visa add in
Page 21 of 76
05.03.2007
Technology
Advanced
Media Group
Page 88 of 142
Beyond the Bijou

SOPHISTICATED FILM TECHNOLOGIES
AND FUTURISTIC FORMATS ARE REDEFINING
THE NATURE OF COHTEMPORARY MOVIE THEATERS.
BY JIM PETTIGREW JR.
Page 22 of 76
05.03.2007
n a world that at times seems defined

by incompatibility, there is one interest which most of us have in common a passion for the movies. And this love
of the cinematic fantasy world shows no
signs of dissipating. Different trends
may appear, such as the VCR explosion,
but upon examining the world of contemporary cinema, one fact becomes
readily apparent - the movies are not
going away. Neither, according to industry leaders, are those esteemed hideouts
of escapism - the theaters.
Though movie theaters are here to
stay, there is a great deal of debate currently going on inside the showcase, or
exhibition end, of the film world. Some
of it concerns topics such as changing
image, and a considerable amount of the
debate relates directly to technology.
The path of events that set the stage for
this situation contains a number of key
elements.
Beginning in the early 1970s. the
movie-theater industry in the U.S.
slowly slipped into what may be called a
technical rut. There were tremendous advances in home-audio technology, but
the exhibition business did not really
keep up.
There was also a trend toward "multiplex" cinema facilities - not an inherently weak mpketing idea - but their
early manifestation didn't prove tenibly
successful. The first multicinemas were
cramped, had very small screens, and
ambient sound many times bled over
from next door.
In the spring of 1977, George Lucas
produced a film that would have a revolutionary. impact on the exhibition industry. It was released to theaters carefully
picked for certain technical standards.
Besides the well-known special effects
and cinematography, Star Wars boasted
a soundtrack in Dolbya stereo. It was
played over an advanced audio system
filled with new designs, including a
"subwoofer" that
-
Page 89 of 142
The film also brought fresh attention

to the large-frame 70mm format. This
expensive but vastly superior process
had been used in earlier landmark
movies (Lawrence of Arabia, Patron)
but had fallen out of favor in Hollywood.
With a new audio standard established
by the Lucas blockbuster, the cinema industry moved into the 1980s - and a
whole, new set of business realities,
coupled with a feverishly expanding

foreground of technological develop
ments.
Clearly, the industry had to adapt and
change. The situation was brought to a
head by the growth of home video, but
that trend was only a part of the whole
arena. Faced with this challenge, the theater industry began what is now a recognizable set of changes to "remainstream"
itself. (The latest studies, incidentally,
show a kind of reverse effect from the
home-movie phenomenon; it's actually
sending patrons back to theaters, seeking
favorite titles in full-blown film environments.)
Fromthtprojtcbknroomtothcbox
oflke, technology is IntWating
the d m house. Developed by
Douglas Tnrmbull, opposite, Showscan@,
equipped with a c o m w e d motion
control system and 70mm fllm, amazed
audiences at Expos '85 and '86. Above,
computerized ticketing and central-data
systems, like thou dewdoped by Pacer
Coqxxaion, are also coming into
the pkture.
SKY May 1987 23

Page 23 of 76
05.03.2007
Zl33 Oak Industrial Dr. N.E.

Grand Rapids, MI 49505
Ton-Free 1-800-253-0882
I'd k e to know more about
Page 90 of 142 SYSTEMS UNDERGO

Thursday,
November 5, 2015
ALP TWX-INSTALLED
RIGID
GERIIFICRPC6N APCD ARE THEN TESTED EVERY SIX
WBHTHS ao ENSURE QUALITY ADHERENCE.
Today, the theater repositioning procAccompanied by an advanced audio

ess takes a number of poses, including
design from THX Sound Systems, a
division of Lucasfilm Ltd., an entire film
better s o u n k
_sensible design,
rests on a platter and feeds through a -cleaner halls. a y m overall push to
projector without the projectionisthaving
reenergize the "experience" vital to
to use two ~rdectors.
moviegoing. "Theater companies are
building at record numbers, by the way,"
notes Glenn Berggren, vice president of
of Azusa,
Optical ~adiationCor~oratidn
California, one of the world's largest
suppliers of theater equipment. "They
want to make them better, not only as operations are concerned - breakdowns,
etc. -they'd also like to have an effective
theater that lets the public know they're
modem, better than the ones built five,
ten years ago."
Theaters are now utilizing computerized ticketing and central-data systems, such as those developed by Pacer
Corporation of Bothell, Washington.
The integrated Pacer system instantaneously gathers all sales data for the cashintensive business, compiles it, and the
information is uploaded nightly by automatic modem to central offices. "Our
Tenyberry award jewelry programs.

Our company logo or my business
card is attached. Please send free
sample artwork and a no-obligation
quote on an:
Award Ring Program
EmblemJewelry Program
17 Please call - I have some questions.
Name
Title
Address
CitylStatelZip
Telephone Number
24 SKY May 1987

Page 24 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 91 of 142
system opens up the possibilities of credit-rard and off-site ticket purchasing,"

s Keith Myers, Pacer's marketing
v
president. "This may reach a whole
different segment of affluent consumers
- r-d even influence the kind of movies
tt are made. "
nis trend is well characterized by
numerous showcases across the country.
@
example is the General Cinema
c, plex inside Merchants Walk, a north
4-.mta mall. There, Cinema One features an advanced audio design from
T < Sound Systems, a division of
L asfilm Ltd. in San Rafael, Californla. "Patrons don't really articulate it,"
exvlains theater manager Steve Crisp,
s' ~ i n off
g the loudspeaker system and
lrily insulated walls, "but they know
wnat they want in a film experience
torlay, and sound is verv"-i
6 e healthy sign that experts point to
i: le influence exerted by firms such as
THX Sound Systems and the Theatre
A1;:nment Program (TAP), both compo7 ts of Lucasfilm Ltd. All THX-ins led systems undergo rigid certification and are then tested every six months
tc nsure quality adherence. TAP vigora ly encourages high standards and
d rogue between suppliers and theaters.
"We are targeting theater managers
a personnel with seminaft," says Kim:t ly Strub, marketing director of the
1..:ater Operations division at Lucasfilm. 'These will help them answer quest IS about film presentation - soundt~ :ks, how they're made. Lots of times
p o p l e will have questions about how
films are made, and the only people that
t' y have to turn to are the theater pers ~nel.We're trying to make sure they
are informed and can answer public
ollestions - and also realize how import t their roles are in the film chain."
Zurrently, amid the film exhibitors'
concerted push to modernize, there is an
aP-elerating debate in both the equip
r nt and showcase fields about what
t hnical form the near future will take.
The issues must be set in context within
-rowing array of spectacular new tech1 ogy, film formats, and even new apI laches to the filmic experience.
Two of the central topics now being
(' Sated with increasing fervor in the in-
'
Page 25 of 76
05.03.2007
SKY May 1987
25
ONE SYSTEM
U'PELIZES
Advanced
Media Group
7 O M M FILM, A VERY LARGE
SCREEN, A H EXTREMELY
FAST F I L M SPEED AT 60
FRAMES PER SECOFJD, AND
DIGITAL SOUND.
dustry include film speed, expressed in

frames-per-second (fps) and film format
(frame size, coupled with larger
screens). A third topic is the increasing
impact of high-grade video and its eventual manifestation - high-definition television (HDTV) - and how the two industries will affect each other.
For decades, the standard film speed
in the theater industry has been 24 fps. At
this srxed. a relativelv low ~roiectionlight ievel' must be iaintainkd iten-16
foot-candles) to prevent an annoying
sensation called "flicker." There are now
several proponents who are urging that
film speeds be raised, so that higher light
levels may be possible. Faster fps rates,
they point out. also make for richer imagery. better color, and heightened spe-
II
26 ADVANCED
SKY May 1987
MEDIA GROUP
cial-effects possibilities - as well as dePage 92 of 142

creasing industry headaches such as
"comet-tailing" and blurring.
The 35mm filrn format has also been
the industry standard for decades.
Numerous industry leaders are quick to
point out its obvious obsolescence. The
70mm filrn size, they note, offers much
more than a 100-percent improvement
in cinematographic possibilities. "Most
people, including large film manufacturers, do not really understand how much
detailed information can be put on 70mm
film," asserts Optical Radiation's Berggren, "and shown back on the screen."
A central point. in an overall sense,
that brings these debates into focus is that
there is an already-existing arsenal of
nevlt cinema systems. Each camp points
inarguably to the future, and each system
is now offering spectacular new cinematic exrxriences.
s o h e of the new formats first debuted
in what the industry calls "specialvenue" theaters - noncommercial, museum, and other educational halls. Currently the granddaddy of these is the
IMAX@/OMNIMAX@ system, now
amazing audiences at Washington, D.C.'s
Smithsonian, Boston's Mugar OMNI
Page 26 of 76
Theater at the Museum of Science,

Chicago's OMNIMAX Theater (located
in the Henry Crown Space Center at the
Museum of Science and Industry), the
h
OMNI Theater at the Fort W o ~ Museum of Science and History, and the Science Museum of Minnesota in St. Paul among others. Several of these "space"
05.03.2007
leaters were designed by the architec~ r a lfirm of Hammel-Green and Abrahamson of Minneapolis, which esti~atedthat 20 million people attended
IMNIMAX theaters around the world in
985.
The heart of the IMAX system is a
nique projection approach; the large-
Page 93 of 142
format images are projected through a
fish-eye lens onto a 76-foot dome, which
washes the screen with an enormous picture. The screen is tilted toward the audience at a 30-degree angle, which creates
a stunning wraparound effect.
Showscan@ is another radically new
film system with breathtaking sensory
experiences. Developed by special-effects wizard Douglas Trumbull (Srar
Wars, Star Trek; director of Silent Running and Brainstorm) Showscan has
amazed audiences at Expos '85 and '86;
the Vancouver theater in Canada remained open after the fair, and 50,000
people saw the Showscan presentation in
January of this year. The corporation is
currently opening special-venue theaters
in Los Angeles and several other cities in
the U. S., Australia, and New Zealand.
Showscan utilizes 70mm film, a very
large screen. an extremely fast film
s g e d at 60 fbs, and digital sound. While
developing the process, Tmmbull ran
extensive tests at various film speeds,
utilizing participants at California universities. For several years in the 1970s,
Tmmbull was also head of Future General, an experimental department at
Paramount Studios.
Atlanta's independent filmmaker,

VanDerKloot Film and Television,
extensively utilizes computers and
high-grade video in current
production work.
Even though Showscan is currently

confined to special-venue theaters, the
corporation clearly has plans to move
into the box-office market. "We don't
have an announcement yet, but we're
very close," says marketing director
Cindy Porter. "We're confident that
when an announcement is made, a feature film will be out within two years."
Currently, the leader in the race to
bring stunning new technology into the
first-mn film market is FuturVision
3*,
a division of FuturCinema Inc. in
New York. The brainchild of former
Kodak executive Eric Knutsen, this process utilizes large-screen (wall-to-wall,
floor-to-ceiling) 70mm, a sophisticated
digital audio system, and runs at 30 fps.
For several months, Knutsen and
FuturVision have had ties with Loews, a
HOW TO PURCHASE ONE OF EUROPE'S

A thousand years of myth and history await you with$ a day's drive
from Stuttgart-in any one of the
most technologically advanced
automobiles ever to come from
Mercedes-Benz. Choose from
among fourteen models.* And
embark on the driving odyssey of
your life. Traveling the Continent
at your leisure, saving money en
route-on trains, taxis, and rental
car costs. See your authorized
dealer. Then see the sights of
Europe-and bring one of them
home. Send coupon at right for
our free color brochure.
'subject to availability
'
Send coupon to:

Mercedes-Benzof
~ o r t ~merica.
h
~nc.,
Marketing Communications
I Division,
lne Mercedes Drive,
II
I
Name
A d k
city
Zip
8 1987 Mercedes-Benz of N A , Inc.. Montvale. NJ
DSMY 87
Page 27 of 76
05.03.2007
SKY
May 1987 27
a BIG
SELLING
IS
PagePQIHT
94 of 142TO FIRST-RUN THEATERS
Thursday, November
5, 2015
&OMPARATIWE EASE OF COMPATIBILITY AND
COST-EFFECPIVEPBESS.
Architectural
Antique Auction
Saturday & Sunday
Starts 10:00a.m.
The lW@
system is a unique projection
approach where large format images are
projected t h ~ aafish*
kns 0a 76-foot dome.
Rare Uk Size Grecian Bronze
Over 1200 Unique I t e m s

will be sold
Several of the best handcarved

panelled roomspailable
Bronzewalls & formal enbyways
Carved wood embellishments
Chandeliers
Magnificent mantels
Saloon & home back bars
Marble statuary
As Always No Minimum No R e s e n e
ComplimentaryM e t and Drinks

For lrnrnedlate 1nformatIon
or Brochure
(Reader Survey Cards Delay Process)
call or write
5070 Peachtree Industrial Blvd.

Atlanta, aA 30341
(404)457-1905
MEDIA GROUP
28 ADVANCED
SKY May 1987
major theater chain (his system is now

being showcased at Loews Tower East,
a prestigious Manhattan screening
room). At presstime, Knutsen was preparing to announce an agreement with a
second major chain.
Besides its audiolvisual sorcery, one
of FuturVision's big selling points to
first-run theaters is comparative ease of
compatibility and cost-effectiveness.
Working with Optical Radiation Corp.,
Knutsen has developed his system so that
it can be integrated into existing theater
hardware - and still offer the dazzling
filmic experiences that all aggressive
chains are now scrutinizing.
One aspect of FuturVision is digital
audio, said to be comparable to CD q ality (actual CDImovie presentations
+stillin the future). With this
daudio is taken from the
film and fed to a Knutsendesigned processor, which then sends audio signals to
an upgraded house system.
"Now," Knutsen says, "the projectionist can walk into the booth and
flip two switches. One automatically
changes screen brightness from low level
to a much higher level for our film, and
at the same time changes film speed from
24 to 30. The second switch automati-
Page 28 of 76
I'
cally bypasses house audio and goes to

our processing equipment. So, there's
virtually no set-up time."
until recently, the film-production
community and the exhibitorltheater
equipment industries have viewed each
other as barely tolerable neighbors,
forced to get along, but with little meaningful dialogue between the two camps.
Now, though, in the face of this starburst
of new technology, the two industries are
working together, insiders point out, to
achieve the common goal of a truly
realistic cinematic experience, and the
subsequent fiscal rewards.
Bill VanDerKloot, owner of VanDerKloot Film and Television in Atlanta,
one of the premier independent filmmakers in the south, has a keen eye on these
and other developments. His firm extensively utilizes computers and high-grade
video in current production work.
"Today," he points out, "stereo soundtracks are mandatory, even for lowbudget films, not the case just ten years
ago. People have become very sophisticated in their technical tastes for film.
"I am just incredibly excited about
what the future has to offer," VanDerKloot concludes. "The more like reality
we can make the dreams that we create
on film, the more fascinating and fantastic films will be."
Contributing editor Jim Pettigrew Jr.
is based in Atlanta, Georgia.Q
05.03.2007
Page 95 of 142
Management Group, LTD

w
m w m p w
Oregon Pike
Lancaster, PA 17601
717-569-5555
Table O f Contents
Section I
~inancialManagement
Section I1
The Project
Section I11
Distribution and Structure
Group
Section IV
Page 29 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 96 of 142
Power Station w a s formed in 1977, in partnership w i t h Tony Bongiovi and

Bob W a l t e r s . Pcrwer Station, within a short period of time established
i t s e l f as the premiere reconhg f a c i l i t y i n the world. The studios
success t o a larye degree is due to Bongiovils tmmerdous creative talents
in the fields of studio design, prduction and en.-t
The a b i l i t y
t o anticipate what the public a t larye wants to hear and to create a
a highly marketable product.
format that will p&ce
Bongiwils creative genius became most evident with his recent success
producing t h e band *IBonJoviu, A f 3 x years of work dweloping t h e i r
t a l e n t and structuring the format f o r their music, ItE3on Jwit*rapidly
became one of top bands in the world.
-\
\.-
Bongiwils most recent project is a bard called I1French LiW, which he

brought into the studio approximately two years ago. You may have heard
French Lick's music in Ron Hawardls p-ction
of Gung-Ho. French Lick's
music and t a l e n t have been developed alo~lgthe s a m e format as "Ban Joviu
and have recmtly been s
h
e to the major r
e
c
o
m labels.
Contracts should be finalized w i t h QuantumMedium in a few weeks.
Quantum M e d i u m is a division of MCA, owned by the same people t h a t own
EWV. Fren& Lick is wholly owned by Power Station, along with t h e i r f i r s t
album, which gives Bongiwi t h e a b i l i t y to use any and all the songs from
the album in the mwie.
By placing the bard in t h e movie and having the music score written by the
band, w e are able t o take advantage of marbting potential mnnally not
available ta other prductions. The music video f o r the band w i l l be shot
a t thedtime as the mavie an3 w i l l primarily be scenes from the
movie. 'Ihe release of the video w i l l be +.inwl to pramate the opening of
the movie. ?he release of the songs off the first album w i l l also be
coordinated to pramate the mwie. W fully urdershnd t h e marketing
potential the band brings to the project, picture what gross receipts a t
the box office would look like i f I*BonJoviI1 were appearing in a movie
this year (Any movie) If F'rench Lick does one tenth as w e l l as Bon Jwi,
this mwie is a -teed
hit.
During Bongiwi ' s work on " S t a r W a r s 1 * , **ApocalypseNaw" and llGung-holl, he

w a s able t o rclake many of the contacts necessary to form t h e extremely
talented group of artists that are essential f o r a production t o be
successful.
Page 30 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 97 of 142
peters: ~irector/Writer/Prducer
has directed many programs such as t W a t t Houston", "Falcon
C r e s t t t, tfGigneyand L
a
w
, tWisfitsw, ~tBerrengersn,and tlRemington
t h a t convinced Tony t o
SteeleN t o name a few. The film Ehrbara dire&&
hire her for this pxduction w a s tWunmoids Frow The Deeptt. Humanoids was
made i n 1978 for $ 980,000 ($ 20,000 d e r budget and four days ahead of
and foreign theatrical
schedule) and grossed aver $28 million in d-ic
Sales. Tixis w a s during a period in time when the video market w a s in its
early stages of d e v e l w t . A film released today t h a t would gross $ 28
million in 1978 dollars has even greater potential for a much higher gross
with the strong video market that is available naw. What impressed Tony
the
w i t h Baxbaratsdjrection of Humnoids w a s her a b i l i t y to bring a
high degree of quality to a film on such a l i m i t e d W g e t .
Peter Hock: Stunt ~ ~ t o r / A c t o r / s & m h m
Peter8s d t s include films such as, Trading Placestt, gtStepford
Bustersw, "FX', and a host of other Films,
Wives", 'To K i l l A Capw, "Ql&
Broadway, - i d s
p,
L
ard Telwision S h c m .
There are many factors which contribute to a projects success. I f you

w e r e t o take a m c s section of the movie h3ustry t o find which types of
projects w e r e most likely to s u m , yau wauld find that movies in the
two t o four million dollar range have much greater chances of success than
movies in the t a t o f i f t e e n million dollar range. The reasons f o r t h i s
are qui,. simple. A movie in the two t o four million dollar range is a
high enough budget to pmduce a quality film h x t limiting the r i s k t o the
investor since it needs less of the market share to p&ce
a profit.
Horror mwies, frran the investors point of view are the safest type of
movie to finance. H o r r o r mies have an almsst cultist fo1lmi.q.
The
type of audience that attenl homr mies rarely w a i t to see what the
critics have t o say about the movie. mere is a fascination w i t h gore
t h a t this audience would rather see than have described t o them. The
overseas market f o r movies of this genre are tremendous. In almost a l l
cases the gross revenues fram the theatre, w i l l be greater overseas than
in the damestic (US and Canada) market. ?his especially holds t r u e f o r
horror movies.
Page 31 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 98 of 142
O v e r the last few years, w e have h e n seeing a trend for movies t o have a
much heavier music score than in the past. The feelings that can be
invoked in an audience from audio are sometimes as great o r greater than
the visual aspects of a film. W i t h Bongiovi's experience and past track
record, w e are assured of having one of the best quality sound tracks t o a
movie ever M e . 'Ibis production could very well revolutionize t h e movie
inctustry i n t h a t this will be the first time that the sound track w i l l be
t o t a l l y digitized fram the set to the theatre o r home video. What this
means is that t h e quality of the sound, which is typically extremely poor
in a m v i e theatre o r hone video cassette, w i l l now be tremendously
crisp. T h i s new m i e sourd will be similar t o the quality you would
aqect froan a laser disc. Normally the costs involved t o produce a m i e
wit31 this type of s a n d track would greatly increase the budget to a point
where the project would have an increased element of risk. With Power
Station, w h i c h W d y has in place state of the art equipnmt, some of
w h i c h can be found in only one o r two other studios in the world, this
sourrd track can be produced f o r a fraction of the costs that another
produckion ccanpany would have to pay. l h i s greatly reduces the r i s k t o
the investor to be able t o prcduce state of the art audio at a fraction of
the costs.
It is a very natural progression f o r a recording studio such as mer

Station to evolve into an e n t e r b b m m t cmplex w h i c h includes the
production of films. Pcrwer Station currently has financing in place f o r a
$ 3.5 million video mix studio t o be fsuilt next t o the recon3i.q studio.
D i s - t r i l p t i o n companies are constantly looking for new sources of product
to market. With Bongiovils track record in the entertairrment industry,
any p&ct
that mies t h e Bongiovi label should create a bidding
silxntion w i t h t h e distributors.
Advanced plblic relations w o r k is currently being done t o set the s t a g e
for negotiations with t h e distribution campanies. l l B i l l h a r d l t , 'VarieWt1,
and "Box Officetqhave W d y agreed t o do a r t i c l e s on Bongiovi and t h e
nmvie. On April 30, ABC w i l l be airing a radio talk show w i t h Boriyiari
that w i l l air on 2300 stations to a total listening audience of over six
million people. "Fame, Fortune, and Romance" have also agreed t o give
network T V coverage.
Page 32 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 99 of 142
The home video market has rapidly been changing the potential mwie
profits for the industry. A Nighbare On Elm Street w a s made for w e l l
under two million dollars and has earned New Line Cinema more than $24
million a t the domestic box office. I n addition, a f t e r a short video
release, this production has sold over 3 million cassettes. In the past
videos w e r e sold only t o video'rental stores for approximately $70
apiece. Recently the price has been lmered t o expand the market t o the
general public. The video rental stores won't disappear, but they may
became more like record stores that also rent their albums. A l l of this
translates into more profit potential for prcducer and investor.
It is an extremely rare opportunity t o be able to get in on the ground
floor in an offshoot of an already well established entertainment
company. Any investor willing to back this project w i l l have f i r s t right
of refusal on any future projects. ?he pe.rcentages w i l l remain the same
for a t least the first two projects.
Page 33 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 100 of 142
Independently prduced motion pictures are a better investment today
than ever before.
1) Increased Markets: There is much wider distribution of motion

pictures today than ever before (i.e. Pay Tv, Cable TV,
videoassettes, satellite tmnsmissions, etc. )
'Presale' contracts which bind the buyers (i.e. networks, pay Tv,
foreign distributors, etc.) t o specific payments a t a future date,
this insuring return of capital and, in sane cases, a p r o f i t before
t h e film is released.
2.
Investment structure:
The producer and investor form a limited partnership for the purposes
of prottucing one or more motion pictures. The investor receives 100%

of the net p r o f i t s until remupent, after w h i c h the s p l i t is 50-50.
Profit participation of o ~ e s s(actors, director, writer, etc. ) canes
out of t h e p&cerls
end.
The pq3uce.r secures t h e services of a director, principal actors,
and a w r i t e r .
Presale Deals:
The producer can negotiate presale (preproduction) arrangements with
distributors, networks, pay TV, merchandisers, etc. Whereas such
ar~angementscan minimize the downside risk, they can also inhibit
the eventual profitability of the film.

Risk Factors:
It is very difficult to determine exactly how much of a r i s k one runs

in financing a theatrical film. Adequate s t a t i s t i c s are hpssible
t o find. Shannat Services of Los Angeles a four-year-old study w h i c h
revealed that 60% of all f
b released make money. This study,
however, did not include long range TV syndication (foreign and
domestic) revenues, and w a s made before Pay TV and video cassettes

Chemical Bank of New York
reports that they have never lost mney on film financing.
became significant additional markets.

r
' \.
-.
Page 34 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 101 of 142
Another r i s k is the possibility that no distributor w i l l want t o

release the picture. That is why some independent producers include
a provision for distribution financing in their investment
agreemmts. I f worse comes t o worst, producers can distribute t h e
film themselves. (Notable examples are ''Billy Jacktt and ttBenjit'.)
There may be production catastrophes that w i l l delay o r cancel
Producers w i l l carry various forms
pmduction o n e it is under
of insuranoe (including completion bonds) t o a t least repay whatever

funds have already been spent.
If a distribution amaqement has not already been made, the producer
now secures such an arrangement. I f the picture is goad, it is

possible to negotiate a much better deal than could have been done
earlier. On the other hand, the producer could have truuble securing
the kind of distribution commitment wanted. The main factors here
are hcw much money the distributor is willing to c o m m i t to s e l l i n g
the picture, h m much influence the producer can have on the
m r l e t i q ~ m p a i g n ,and the distribution fee. Sanetimes smll
distributors are able t o give more time and attention t o indeperdent
pictures and offer better terms, but the producer may have to provi.de
same - W o n
expexes.
of gmss domestic box office receipts, the exhibitor (retailer)
usually subtracts his fixed costs and then receives 10%. Cut of t h e
ranainjng 90% gmss film rentals received by the distributor
(wholesaler), he usually recoups all or part of his costs plus a
distribution fee of 20-35%, then passes the rest on t o the
producer/hwestor. Terms of distribution deals vary considerably.
Cut
Ebx office reoeipts, however, only account for a part of the

producer/investorls revenues. A s the enclosed figures show, t h e
ancillary markets are a t least as significant as the daoestic theatre
box office. T V syndication, for instance, can continue t o bring in
revenues f o r the next twenty years.
Demand for P r d ~ c t :
TWayts supply comes nowhere near to mtching real demand. A t the

present time, there are over 18,000 theatres i n the United S t a t e s .
It can readily be seen t h a t roughly 400 films produced and rated l a s t
year did not w i n t o m e e t t h e i r needs. Theatres are canpelled t o
show any type of film they can obtain to keep t h e i r doors open.
Page 35 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 102 of 142
To date, independent producers are responsible for 72% of a l l films

mde world-wide. The domestic figure is 62%. The independent
producer has three primary options -r
distribution. These
include the sale of the film outright to a major national
distributor, t h e i r merchandising of the film by the production
who
company i t s e l f , o r the use of smaller regional sub-distsibuto~~
m y promote the film in their respective geographical areas.
Distribution of films often relies on a l l three methods t o one degree
or another.
Another market, television, can consume nearly every film that has
been, o r is presently being produced. If each of the three networks
would show only one film per night, they would need over 1,000 f i l m s
per year. In ks Angeles area alone, there are nearly 10,000 f i l n ~ ~
aired each year in a ambination of local and network viewing time.
Many f i l m s are shown time and time again because there are no new
fibs to replace them.
Today, virtually every film of quality has residual value in
television, either by outright sale o r by t e n n licensing. Tke latter
is preferable since it a l l = the production company to retain
' p of the negative. The t i m e lag between theatre release and
~hasdimini~edfromsev~yearstoanaverageof18mnths.
Hwever, scnne major features such as ffTheWizft have been sold to TV
before completing a full year in theatrical release. The trend seems
to be toward prchase of 'freshf films, and the outlets appear
willing to pay the higher costs involved
I
Because of the great demand and the outrageously ccanpetitive a t t i t u d e

that pemades the networks, handsame deals are being consummated
before the production has been q l e t e d and then, by p-ement
w i t h the producers, hold the film u n t i l it has completed its
theatrical run.
Page 36 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 103 of 142
Page 37 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 104 of 142
Breakeven for Limited Parhers:
Based on gross revenues of $ 11,200,000 collected fm 1st and 2nd

theatrical runs
1st run ticket costs of $ 6.00
2nd run ticket
costs of $
5.00
1st Run
50 people per shed
x $ 6.00
$ 300.00 G r o s s per show
$ 300.00 per shaw X 1000 houses
$ 300,000 G r o s s
$ 300,000 X 14 days
$ 4,200,000 G r o s s
$ 250.00 G r o s s per show
$ 250.00 per shod X 2000 houses
$ 500,000 G r o s s
$ 500,000 X 14 days
$ 7,000,000 G r o s s
2nd Run
50 pea~leper show
X $ 5.00
TotalIstm
Total 2nd Run
Total
Page 38 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 105 of 142
Forcast A
Total Box Office G r o s s

Less 15%For Theatres
-----
--
Motion Picture P r o f i t s
Less 30% Distribution Fee
L e s s : Investors Capital
N e t Profit
-$
---------
----
Producers Split @ 50%
--
Invesbmt Company R e t u m
Less : General Partners Split @ 15%
Investors Return
11,200,000
1,680,000
9,520,000
2,856,000
6,664,000
4,000.000
2,664,000
1,332,000
1,332,000
199,800
1,132,200
T h e s e are only proiections and are for informational ~ u p o s e sonly. Any

investment made, based s o l e l y on these proiections would be unadvisable as
actual P e r f o m c e could varv m e a t l y .
Page 39 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 106 of 142
Forecast B
Forecast B is based on a total box office gross of $ 28 million
A film that produces a theatrical gmss of $ 28 million can be expect& to
gross at least that much from W ,Cable and video markets. Depending on how
distribution agreements are negotiated we can expect 50% to be net profits.
Page 40 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 107 of 142
Forecast B
-----------
Total Box O f f i c e Gross

B s 15% For Theatres
$ 28,000,000
--------I----
Motion Picture P r o f i t s ----TpCC 30%
4,200,000
$ 23,800,000
Distribution Fee
7,140,000
$ 16,660,000
T.V.,
Cable and V i d e o N e t --------
$ 14,000,000
Total N e t -------TpCC :
$ 25.340.000
Investors Capital
N e t Profit
----------
4,000,000
$ 21,340,000
m c e x s S p l i t @ 50%
$ lo., 670,000
Invesbent Companiest Return
$ 10,670,000
L e s s :,General Partners S p l i t @ 15%
1,600,500
Investors Return
9,069,500
These are only proiections and are f o r informational txlnxses only. An

invesmt made, based solely on these ~ m i e c t i o n swould be unadvisable as
actual p e r f o m c e could v a r ~sreatly.
Page 41 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 108 of 142
You Oughta Be In
Pictures!
1
I
by Alan Talansky
here's esplosive growth occurring in the motion picture industry, and growth should always be
music to any investor's ears. "But
movies?" YOU say? It's time to put
aside your images of Tinschonrn and
"Heaven's Gate," and to take another
look at an industry with some new,
sound investment potential.
There's risk in any investment, of
course, even in real estate - the investment area on which many firms
originally buiit their reputation and
success. In real estate, it's a matter of
how carefully you assess a variery of
influential factors and how you structure the deal. Motion pictures are
much the same. You've got to look
'
;
j
:I I
fashioned profit: an ideal solution for

post tax-reform era.
The key here is understsnding how
nluch the industry has chsnged. The
tyranny and fickleness of box-office
receipts is no longer. More people
around the world are viewing more
films than ever before, but not necessarily in the theatres. Consider, for
example, that there are only about 300
feature films made every year, of
which about half could be considered
-major.- NOW, compare that with the
number of movies a cable outlet, like
Home Box Office,
shows in a single
day. Eight? Then,
take a look at the
shelves of ytwr l t x ~ l
3.
ucts to be financed, and the second is

the structuring of the deal.
1, selecting the product, success is
usually found in
~ 1 ,
larger the budget in a film, the grcatcr
the fink.
the $50 ,-,,illion
pdted blockbusters and seek out. instead, the more modest undenakings
smaller, ambitious film production sources. A,, excellent exan,ple
is
Island Picture-, a relatively
independent film production and distribution company for which, last
Not quite a blockbustec lslund's "Nobodv's Fool. " s t a r r i t ~ ~

Karannu Arquellr und Eric Roberts, wus a more morlrrute success.
e m with Pulitzer Prize winrringpIrrywnght tkfh Henley wri~ing.Photo
courtesy I S MPictures.
I
ll
:I
I
Success on a shoestring: Producer/director Spike Lee (center) turned

a paltry $ 175,000 procluctiun bltdget for "She's Gt~ttuHum It' itklo u
$7 milliotr grcw.itr(:suprise hit. Co-stun-jolrn Cutrurlu Terndl (left) cord
Redmotrl H i c k (n(:/rt, wiill i r e utz tire w t PMto courtesy Forty k e s
and a Mule Filmworks.
When the motion picture industry

was first examined as an investment
, vehicle a few years ago, the expecta1 tion was that there was potential for
tax deferment. What was found, however, was a surprisingly rich source of
income for investors from good, old-
video rental store,

and the crowds
looking them overt
and you begin to
understand the dimensions of growth.
Of course, just as not every piece of
real estate is a great investment, every
movie isn't bound t o turn a p-ofi;.
But, there are two factors that have
proven to be the critical difference in
creating a sound investment vehicle.
The first is the selection of the prod-
Page 42 of 76
year, a $7.4 million equity placement

was arranged. Island Pictures is an rfficient operation - unlike some of
the more notorious larger Hollywood
studios - a n d it knows how to
recognize quality.
Little known Island Pictures captured a great deal of attention in 1985
with two extraordinary films - "Kiss
of the Spider Woman" and "Trip to
Bountiful." It was the first time in history that o n e production house could
claim credit for both the Best Actor
05.03.2007
Page 109 of 142
The information set forth herein w a s obtained fnan sources w h i c h w e

believe reliable, but w e do not guarantee its accuracy. N e i t h e r t h e
information nor any opinion apressed constitutes a solicitation by us of
the purchase o r sale of any securities or cammodities. 'Ibis package is
f o r informational purposes only, t o gain an indication of interest in t h i s
project. Financial Management Group Ltd. does not endorsed and has not
been contracted by Wer Station t o promote this project. Any questions
regardug information contained herein should be direckd t o Stanley J.
Caterbone o r Scott Robertson.
Page 43 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 110 of 142
Page 44 of 76
05.03.2007
I.
Page 111 of 142
w
t
y Financing with LimitedD-
a.
b.
c.
d.
UnlimitedMmrberof Investors
Small units of $5,000 to $25,000 per unit
Share 50%of profits w i t h Limited Partners
Time constraints as follows:
1. 90 day for regulatory appto s o l i c i t securities
2.
30
60 days to raise 2 - 4 million
11.
Equity Financing w i t h General Partners
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Smallnumberof investors
No time constraints t o raise funds
Large u n i t s $1 to $4 million units
Share 50%of profits w i t h General Partners
Very difficult because of the poor economic reputation of film
b3ustry w i t h r q x d s to investors.
111. Debt Financing with General Partners
a.
b.
IV.
F're Sell Distr-ion
a.
v.
above
Costs are 50%interest per year: For every $1 million, it w i l l cost
a t least $500,000 in guaranteed interest payments.
Sam= as
Contracts
b.
W of m t i v e Control
Share 60% to 80% of profits w i t h Distribution Ccarpany
c.
d.
upside potential
L i t t l e damside risk
DebtwithLineof Credit
a.
b.
c.
d.
Need collateral redL estate, inventory or accounts receivables

Very cheap 8% - 11%
per year for i n t e r s t
N o t h constraints
No loss of creative control
Page 45 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 112 of 142
ANALYSIS
The follawing Analysis shows how the different forms of financing

conpare to one another under the most important variables to us:
1. Creative Control
2. Time parameters
3. Costs
I used three economic sceneries as to the net results of the
project:
1. A
of 1 Million Dollars
2. A Profit of 15 Million Dollars
3. A Profit of 100 Million Dollars
Alternatives
Time
Creative
Corrtrol
Cost
Of
Financing
LDss Of
1.1 Equity
90-180
Days
Same
mss
50% of
Profits
No lhss
$7.5 M
$50 M.
with Limited
II*)Equity
with General
30-180
MOZ
$7.!34
$50 M
Loss
50% of
Profits
No bss
Days
111. ) Debt with
30-180
50%-100%
Interest
$3.0 M
$3.0 M
Days
S ~ T E
Less
No Lr>ss
Generals
$10.5M
$70 M
Profit
$1 Million of $15M
Profit Of
of $100M
m e s
N.) Pre Sell

Distribution
Days
V. ) Line of
Credit
mYs
30-180
- 30
60%-80%
NO LOSS
of Profits
None
Inst
8%-11%
Interest
Payments
Page 46 of 76
Refinance
$440,000
or
with 30 year less
note with
$9523/Mo.
payment @11%
Wlilding
$440,000
or
less
05.03.2007
Page 113 of 142
1.
Story
2.
Treatment
35,000
3.
Director
50,000
4.
5.
ArleneandEhrbara, N.Y.
6.
Finance Costs
5,000
110,000
50,000
200.000
$ 450,000
Line of Credit
$ 250,000
Stan's Investor
250,000
The above gives us 60 days to receive funds froan Sony and Visa for the spot in
the beginning of the video.
n-Lis gives us a chance to get money without using the line of credit.
Page 47 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 114 of 142
IIAY
THE MI-ITANT FRO.-IEC:T
27, 1 i/:37
__--____--_________-------------------------------------TOTALS
_-_---_-_-_--__-_---------------------------------------;
STORY
O
C:SINT I NU ITY AND TFi'EATMENT
F'ROKIUCEK
o
D 1RECTOR
3+
OAST
BITS
EXTRAS AND STAND-INS
II
5;0(:10.00:
3.1(75(:1(:](:I :
1 15054. 00 :
2250(2(11.
(I): :
38&,,212.
(10:
521.00:
122253. C)O :
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
----------------,-----------------------#---------------'
TOTAL ABOVE THE L I N E
a
8E8&.YCl.00 1
I
----------------------------------------a---------------;
I
I
I
I
PRODUCTION STAFF S A L A R I E S
PRCfDtlC:TI ON OPERAT I
NG STAFF
SET D E S I G N I N G
SET OPERATING EXPENSES
LOCAT I ON
TESTS AND RETAKES
CUTTING/FILM/LAEORATORY
MClS 1 C
SI~I-IND _
PLIEL I C I T Y
MISCELLANEOUS
INSURANCE/TAXES/LICENSE5; k FEES
GENERAL OVERHEAD
I
I
I
8
I
I
I
I
8I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
8I
I
1
I
I
I
1Y255S. 00 :
58295&..001
Z051cS5.00:
26t5.858.C)O 1
543:395.00:
20750.OC) :
-3~-4244.
.-.
(:)(I
:
161409.00:
184359.00:
1
19121.00:
31 1381.00:
3580(1.C)(] :
I
1
I
-----------------------------------------;---------------t
TOTAL BELOW THE L I N E
2c5c,516.00 :
1
I
37472(1)&.00 :
1I
&*46750.00:
4393956.C)C)1
----------------------------------------;---------------t
----------------------------------------;---------------t
TOTAL ABOVE b FELQW THE L I N E
----------------------------------------;---------;=----:
----------------------------------------1---------------;
TOTAL F I N A N C E CHGS/CClNTINGENCY /BONDS

----------------------------------------;---------------t
GRAND TCfTCIL
........................................
--f-------
tlOES NOT INCLUDE c:2"'' f ::r>ENIY
Page 48 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 115 of 142
F'AGE 1
STORY:
I [lAYS/WEEt::S
RATE
TClTAL
'------------I---------------;-------------.
4.
P.
C:.
STiIIKY F'l-lRC:HASE
T I T L E PI-1HC:HASE
M1SCELLANEiII-1::; EXPENSE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
aI
5(:)0<).()0
1 5<100.
00
: U
: O
I
I
-----------------------------------I------------l---------------;--------------
TlIlTAL STORY:
-----------------------------------'----'------------:---------------;-------------Cl3NT INU ITY AND TREATMENT:

A.
B.
EB.
C.
I?.
E.
50(:,C).
00
aI
WR ITERS
SECRETARIES AND T Y P I S T S
PAYROLL TAXES - B (15.8%)
XEROX EXPENSE
RESEARCIH EXPENSE
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE
30000.00
: 3000O.O~)
: O
: O
: 3000.00
: 1650.00
8
I
1
I
a1
8I
1 .IS
I
I
aI
8I
8I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
200.00
----------------------------'------------;---------------a-------------.
TOTAL C O N T I N U I T Y AND TREATMENT:

?
-----------------------------------'------------;---------------;------------PHODIJCER :
I
a
I
I
&7em~G
A.
B.
BE.
C.
C:C.
D.
S ROEINSON/S
I
I
aI
I
I
I
I
I
I
ta
I
I
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
I
I
aI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ASSOCIATES (ARLENE)
BARBARA PEETEKS (DEFERRED)
SECRETARIES
PAYROLL TAXES - C: ( 1 5 . 8 % )
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE
100000.00
o
I
26
aI
I
I
3465(1).(](I
500.00
0
0
10~l000.00
0
13000.00
2054.00
0
-----------------------------------~------------~---------------~-------------.
TOTAL PRC1DUC:ER :
115c)54.00
-----------------------------------;------------;---------------t-------------
D I REC:TilR:
11
IRECTOR
B. SECRETARIES
EB. PAYROLL TAX - P ( 15.8%)
C.
HEALTH b WELFARE/PENSION
D. MISCELLANEOCIS EXPENSE
A.
12.5%
I
I
8I
8
1
200000. 00
-1I
20006C). 00
:
:
:
I
I
1
a
I
I
I
I
I
I
: 5
: 34
: 15
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
0
25(]0(].()(]
i)
-----------------------------------;------------1---------------;-------------
TOTAL D IRECTIIIR
225~1(:1(:).0(:)
-----------------------------------'------------;---------------1-------------
cAST :
C:OL HEMSLEY ( P / D Y
RICK (P/DY)
.-IERKY ( P / t l Y )
VTC (rn./r~
5 T h N ( F/ tfY)
~)
t::ATIE ( P / D Y )
GARREN ( F ' / D Y )
--IRCt:' ( P / D Y )
:
:
.-, ,
A%s
zk,
11
7
5
:. -
Page 49 of 76
10c)0.(1(:)
1000.00
1000.00
I (1)0 (1) (3(11
~C)Q(:I.~I~
1(1)(1)<I (1)(11
523.00
1 525. (:I(:)
.
---
-.-.
:
:
:
:
:
5000.
34(:)c)(].00
15000. (30
2:30(:)0.(:I(:!
2k.0i10.i~c)
1100(1) (1)(1)
3675. 0~:)
2(;25.(:)(1)
.-.,-.
05.03.2007
?.F
Page 116 of 142
MATTHEW AP'A MR X ( F ' / D Y )

5 T H BOND MEMBER ( P / D Y )
LII~II:: t::LEIN ( F / t l Y )
BARNEY ( P / D Y )
.-IE:I-;;SIE ( P / D Y )
r::ORRI E ( P/DY
ELID ( P / D Y )
1::HARLIE ( P / D Y 1
ANNIE ( F / D Y )
I:rl'i L!-lN!:iRIN ( F ' / D Y )
lz*;4t.l (P/L!Y)
!:.Ers!+!'<<f:8i[!y;
I:.; lt.~I:~l: r.., i ( ,ras-tx TI.,-\r-I 1' \
,-!v,,,l::El:; i
.-.- i i .*,:.-1;.
:-Ir: '..' ,.
~.:;I>LLE[.~
(:(.{&*:.,'rEFi
- - .plat.; ( t : - l i CI r\ r-iA\,' )
J.
- . . , - . - I :
kAJ/
,.-.,-,-8--l,
EL!'{
.-- .,
,-,L
z.;%;l-k:!~:;;:=;c !:.;-F,;
p!9 . ' .
':;:C:>!'yt:'".'
r.-..
llti
[,!;q.f
"
(FfjJ< Llf;y')
.,' p-lr.; (i:.Er.*
,-, i-!{-,.,'
LI, 3 -a
.
;)E;
.
',/ .
L..'l..-c
..LI
( pk-!.L
\n :. \
:!
i.!{:,',':
;; L.12
"2
7
A
;;;i\.;:;
:f;'?'AFF WC!MAf;!
,:
:I#
':' ?
.
.. .:.. ,-"
\
;-'Z:f:
L
'""
L.*.,i? :
i:A\,' ',
.. ,-." ,I-.... .,- (. !.,L::,L!t.%,%!

.:.,-<l-,.t,
j
Li;.,<; ;-: 1r,i i-,
1 ,L 2: ;:..;I.,.-. . >:&!''\ j
...-? ( FEE c!A'y )
.i
\.
!1: 1.;
&
. , ... id:;=* ::- ( p k.l< LlG .i
ELE?,(zHc[l BF; 1x:!; 1 ; C:*FIf;: LI;?~','
ELEACHEtr E R A 1: r.]:
2 ( PElI; C-IA';' )
BLEF;IZHEU SK;iIN:S 3 ( P E R trAY)
FLERC:HED F R 6 I N S L! (PEK tlHY )
Cl:fA!sT
Gl-lARD (PER DAY )
F R I L L Y G I R L (PER DAY)
MRS. QUEEN ( PER ! DAY 1
HANDSOME TEENAGER ( F'ER EIAY )
G I A N T ULTRIMA GUARD ( PER DAY
CRlJDE BOY'S ISATE ( PER DAY )
CORPSE OFFICER 1 ( PER DAY
BARRICADE C:OP 1 (PER D A Y )
MUTANT S I T E CIIP ( PER DAY )
t::ERR '5 S 1DEK 1C:F:: C:IIIF' ( PER DAY )
:
tk:-
.-
P..
&..
-.
?,
,-'
' :%
HEALTH k WELFfiRE (11%)

FAYROLL TAXES (15.8%)
OVERTIME CAST ( 5 % )
STI-lNTS :
Bl3QT DRIVER
11
IVER
CHARLIE I N TANK
G I R L PULLED FR R I D E
BOY PULLED F R H I D E
CREEP PULLED FR R I D E
C H A R L I E & BARNEY F I G H T
STAN FEATS COL H
HEALTH & WELFARE/F'ENSI ON
PAYROLL TAXES ( 15.8%)
l l T STLINTMEN ( 5 %1
1 1% )
Page 50 of 76
05.03.2007
Advanced
Media
C:IIIAC:H I NG
( VGroup
O I C:E/STUNT IZOCIRD/ETI:
HEALTH h WELFARE ( 1 1 % )
FAYROLL TAXES ( 15. %
:
)
!:IT
STI-INT COr3R ( 5%
i1:AST 1N G D I RErI:T!]R
IZAsT I NG SIJPPL I E:; ( 5%)
MISCELLANEOUS
) Page
:
:11720of 142
4 <I
I4
5, 2015
(11 . (1) (1) Thursday, November
: E:-:C)(:)O.i)c]
: ::::3(1) (:)(I)
4I
1 5 (1)(:)
.(1)(1)
I8
:
:
:
:
.
.
1264. O i )
4 4 4 (11(1)
C.0(:)0 (:I(:)
:300, 00
(1)
0
,--------------(-------------.
TOTAL CAST
-------------------------------'------------'---------------i-------------
FITS:
KCINN ING TEENAGER ( P/ISY
DANCING G I R L ( P / D Y
F R I L L Y MClM
HEALTH ?A WELFARE/PENSION
PAYROLL TAXES (15.8%)
OVERT IME
F I T T I N G CHARGES
:
:
:
1
I
1
:
:
:
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
8
1
I
1
I
I
TOTAL B I T S :
I
I
EXTRAS:
SEE PRELIMINARY BOARD
150.00
150.00
150.00
-----------------------------------;------------;---------------;-------------
1
t
1400
1400
700
81
1
I
I
1
tI
1400
18375.00
4539.00
0
1 11271.89
: 1334.59
:
:
:
:
77.00
: 15520.00
8I
aI
I8
4.00
1 2452.16
0
: 5600. 00
1400
(1)
70(:)0.00
0
160
45000.00
5;. 00
I
I
13.13
6.57
STAND-INS ( 4 X 46 DAYS)
PAYROLL TAXES ( 15.8%)
HRW STAND- I N S (NUN UNION
FClX LUNCHES - EXTRAS
:
:
I 0
EXTRA ADJUSTMENTS ( D R I V E T O ) .
35. 00
I
I
OVERTIME ( 2 HRS)
OVERT1ME ( 1 ADD HR 1
F I T T I N G FEE
PAYROLL TAXES ( 15.8%
SERVICE FEE ( 10%)
: 150. 00
: 150.00
: 150.00
: O
: 0
: 71.
: 0
: 0
: 0
: 0
i 521.10
-----------------------------------'------------;---------------;------------I
380211.7(:)
4I
1t
122252.64
-----------,-----------------------I------------l---------------_:-------------
TOTAL EXTRAS AND STAND-INS
-----------------------------------I------------~---------------~------------I
I
I
I
I
-----------------------------------:------------;---------------o-------------
: :28:368'3. 44
-_----_---_--__-___-----------------------------------------------------
GRAND TOTAL ABOVE THE L I N E
4I
Page 51 of 76
I8
05.03.2007
Page 118 of 142
. ..
1,-
. < ,. , .
.'\.::,
t'.F,,:.!i
1 ~ .
. ,
.,
-.,-
:'_
I_
I'
ErD.
tE.
F.
G.
.,:
.-I.
K.
L.
M.
N.
N.
,'
;; ;!
. .
,,,
.,
;:,-;-,;
. ..
. a ,
.. .
\ :
.:
,..$1.:
-8..
, '-%I.;
, ,.+:!:k 8
i:.'
:[-.:LI;> .. . j
'
,.,I1
.I...L
/;.:,.:
:
I
:
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
-.
.I
:-,
.,:s, ,. .
I
:A
..
.:
ZND 2 N T ! At1 ( P E R WEEK)

TrNrl Art PRODI-IC:I ON F E E ( P E R WEEK )
Ll11C:fiTI CIN MANAGER ( P E R WEEK )
!:;CR IF'T :i;IIF'EKV I:;OR
( P E R [IAY )
F'RODI-IC:T I ON C:I-\IIIRD I NATOR ( P R ClAY
TEC:HN I C A L AIIV I SOH ( PER D A Y
NI-IRSE ( P E R D A Y )
LI:IC:AT I ON AI-Itl ITOR ( P E R WEEK)
WELFARE/TEAC:HER ( P E R D A Y )
N I G H T PREMIUM ( 5 DAYS)-50%
IIIVERTIME ( 5 % )
;::;.;;c:;-!;y
;-
, .
.
.
.,.,:..:. i
j.'F
;;;l;,:;-!;,-!-;!~:.
_,I I.
<i.:s;..:~.,;
b!~ii:,.j
1~ ; !.-:>; ;:L:FI
I
I- (!:*Fcr< i&Et.: )
.; Ll 1 \?:!:TI:I&'
I
( (PER WEEK )
I
.. ,
. .:
.' -;. 1.
.,,,.
. .
.
il.
.
I!
.
.'??;;'
:
I
. .
: .,!>
...
r
-
- .
~. ,
11:
2 7 (1)(1) (2(1) :
I=,
4 1(1) (1)(1) :
18 (1) (11 (1)(1) I
17I:( (1) (3[:I I
329.00 :
1000. (30 :
235.00 :
1-30. ( ~ 3:
#-.
.
.
1(1) :
.=.
*-+
at
,=a
--*
16:
43:
A1I
10:
1(2 !
121
300.00:
175. (30 :
13(:)0. 00 :
200.00 :
1175.00 1
.-I
L I
t
.5:
(-):
297(:)C).
i:~!
:=:?::(I)
(1)(
1 :: (1)
(1)I
13/-.
(:I(;)
01
2 r 5 ~ : 2(1):.
14Oc:)O. (111
li)l(:15.(111
1 1 59(:) (1)I
2: o (1)(1) (1)!
175(1). (111
156()(:, (111
4t70. (111
537.51
* ? l k 8 y .4:
.
.
: : : 5 f 1 4. (-),
11: (1)(1) ;
4
I
I
1
t
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
tI
I
I
9:
51 :
5:
10:
3000.00 :
340.00 :
~ - 3 50(11
. :
235. O(7 :
220.00:
275.00 :
150. 00 :
I
I
aI
.
.
-----------------------------------:------------;---------------a--------------
T O T A L PRI:IDUI_~T I ON S T A F F :
1'32557.9
-----------------------------------;------------1---------------1--------------
PROKII-ICT I ON OPERAT I NG S T A F F :
A.
C:AMERAMEN
D I RECTOR O F PHOTOGRAPHY ( P/WK
CAMERA OPERATOR ( 5;
( P/DAY
KEY 1 S T ASSISTANT ( P / D A Y )
1ST ASSISTANT (P/DAY)
2ND ASSISTANT (P/DAY)
VTR PLAYBACK (?/DAY)
S T I L L P H I ~ T I I C ~ R A P H E R( P / 3 H D A Y )
E X T R A CAMERA OPERATORS
N I G H T PREMIUM ( 5 D A Y S ) - 5 0 %
O. T. CAMERA CREW ( 10%
M 1SC:ELLANEI]I-I!E;
1
8
I
I
I
I
I
q
51:
41:
41:
F ?
4 I
c
9(25(] (30 :
I
I
I
I
II
1
I
.
.
2 7 (1)0 (3 (1)
1 7 3 4 0 . (1)'
11935. (11
9r5,C:5.0
Q(320, i)
1275. (3
1%(:)(:I (1)
(1)
4 5 2 5 . (7
E: 24,E: .(11
-----------------------------------#------------*---------------*--------------
TCITAL CAMERA S T A F F
'9(I)y4::
-----------------------------------I------------~---------------l--------------
SfIlI-IND DEPARTMENT
MIXER (F'/tIAY)
RECIIIHDER
FCICIM PERSON ( P / D A Y
11:AELE P E R S O N ( P / D A Y
IZAELE FtIlOM PERSCIN
RAD 1111PERSCIN
N I G H T P K E M ILlM ( 5 D A Y S - 5 0 %
O.T.
SlIlI-IND C:REW (1(11%)
M 1:~;(~:ELLANEIIII-I:I-;
I
I
t
I
1
I
I
I
41:
275. 00 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
41:
41:
235. (I):
I
I
I
I
I
I
c
LU
8
1
3725.00
I
I
t
I
I
a
12:
STAFF
WAR~IROFE IIlEPARTMENT
WARDROBE LIES i GNER ( P/WK
L.!,c)F;rr~f~;GC7 I 2 1
.
.
(:
18k.2. 5
324(:1. 7
--356.4:::.I:
".'CK,
W[IlMEI\I.':3 CJ&Rfiti!ilr*E 1 S T ( P / K l A Y )
I
I
I
Page 52 of 76
,
I
51:
.(1
aI
1/ 5 0 0 . 0 0
(-1
'?6:35. (1)
(11
------------------;------s------
. :1
I
I
-----------------------------------'------------#-----
TIIITAL S1:fUNEl
9/. --.-,.-I
'3 c
.
.-
(-1
I
t
I
I
11275. (1;
-4
235.00:
.(11
.(1;
la32(:)(:).
'
235.
a(:,:
1 1.?:::.y
05.03.2007
(.
G.
Page 119 of 142
SET DF;ES:-:ING DEF'AKTHENT

:SET [IEIZI:IK'ATIS~~ ( F'/ [IAY )
ASST SET [IEC:I:IRPTI:IR
( /='/DRY )
[lRES:::/RE[IRE:f;S/STF(
1K E
DRES::;/REDRESS/STR
J tc:E
[IRE:S:I;/RE[I~E!:;::;/STR
1K E
DRAPERY PERSON
r3REENSPERSl:lN
GREENSPERSON
N I G H T PREMILIM ( 5 D A Y S ) -50%
i t . T.
S E T DRESSING C:REW ( 10%)
M I SC:ELLANEl:lUS
. (1
4
I
51:
51:
.-, -,..-.c
.-, (1)(1) :
2 2(:1 (](:I :
8
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
,
t
a
I
(:
(:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.51
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2275.00
(:
.C
. (1
.
.r
.
I
I
1 1 *.;/: 5
11220.
(:
.i
1137. .?
24:1:4. 1
-----------------------------------I------------~---------------~--------------
TOTAL SET DRESSING S T A F F
26776.7
-----------------------------------:------------1---------------;--------------
H.
I
I
E L E C T R I C A L DEPARTMENT
I
1
43:
GAFFER ( P / D G Y 1
1
41:
BEST BOY ( P / D A Y )
I
I
41:
E L E C CIF'ERATINC; LABISR ( P/DAY
I
I
41:
E L E C OPERATING LABOR ( P / D A Y
I
I
I
I
E L E C OPERATING LABOR ( P / D A Y
1
I
41:
GENERATOR OPERATOR ( P / D A Y )
I
I
I
I
GENERATOR OPERATOR
I
I
I
I
ELECTRICAL RIGGING/STRIKING
I
a
I
I
E L E C T R I C A L R 11313IN G / S T R I k< I NCi
I
I
I
F A N OPERATOR
I
C I
I
.-I I
N IGHT F'REM I 1-IM ( 5 DAYS ) =50%
O.T.
E L E C T R I C DEPARTMENT (10%) :
I
I
I
M 1SCELLANEI~IJS
I
I
-----------------------------------'--------------;---------------:-------------.
235.00 :
222). 00 :
210.00:
210. 00 :
220.00
86.I(:).
I
I
.I
9c)2(:).(
.
.t
.
.
I
I
(.
I
I
I
5475.00
(.
27:::7. F
4810. :
I
I
10105. (1
5~(:)2(:) (1
161t:). (
TOTAL E L E C T R I C A L S T A F F
.(1
I
I
1
I
4 L Y- 1 2 . ;
c-,
-----------------------------------1------------;---------------1-------------I
I. S P E C I A L E F F E C T S
I
I
S P F X C I X t R D I NATOR ( P / D A Y
SF' FX OPERATING LABOR ( P / D A Y )
:
:3P F X OPERATING LABOR ( P / D A Y
:
I
I
!Z;FECIAL F X OPERATING LABOR
I
D E S I G N ING $< DRAFT 1NlIi LABI3R
I
I
I
ElESIGNING .9< D R A F T I N G LABClR
C1:lNSTRUC:T 1GIN tf R I 1 2 cI N I ~LABOR
:
C:ONSTRUCTION fq R I G G I N G LABOR
:
I
t
N IGHT PREM Il l M ( 5 DAYS 1 - 5 0 %
111.T. SF'E1:IAL
FX ElEPAHTMENT 10% :
1
M 1SCELLANElIlIJS
I
10:
10:
10 :
305. (20 :
:
3(:)5.0cJ
:
3<15.c)0
1
I
I
I
..-I
100.
1525.
(
1
(:I
.'
I
I
(I(]
I
C1.Q:
3(:15(:).
..I.(-1
I
I
C I
1
(1)5 (1)
: :1
5:
.
.
5 (11.
.
.
5 (1) .
I
I
762.
1041.
-----------------------------------;------------;---------------;------------I
I
S E T STANDBY OPERATORS
I
I
I
CARPENTER ( F / D A Y )
I
CARPENTER ( P / D A Y )
I
I
I
EXTRA CARPENTER LABOR
I
N I G H T PREMIUM ( 5 D A Y S ) - 5 0 %
I
TI. T
SET z;TAwryrE!v ~ I F E R ~ ~ T I ~ 1(5%
IHS :
,
1 :! 11.EL L& Pi 1'11i-I .=,
I
I
1(11 :
1(:I:
250.00 :
.-, .-.
.>c (j
o:
TOTAL S P E C I A L F X S T A F F
-----------------------------------'------------:---------------;------------J.
.-.
-1.
1
..-I
E 8
I
100. 00 :
1250.09 1
I1
I
I
I
I
I
t
11453.
577.
-----------------------------------~------------*---------------*-------------
Page 53 of 76
.
.
.
/-.'7.-' .
- (-1.-I(-1
c
L .--.-a (1
::: (1)(1)
.TC
a:.>.
05.03.2007
7.
Page 120 of 142
TIIITAL :SET S / F l3F'EKF;T I PIIIi :i;TAFF

/.352. .5(
----------------------------------- ------------ I__---_----_-_--(-_----- I
I .
:SET STANDBY F'A I NTER5;
I
. I
.=,
.::. s(1), (1) :
:: (1)4 C) . (1)(
P A I N T E R (F'/DAY)
.(1)(
F'A I N T E R
.-I
i
1 0 (1) (1)(1) :
3 1 )(11 0 (
EXTRA F A I N T E R L A B I ~ R
.3
JL4.
(I)(
13. T . S E T STANDBY F'fi INTER::: 10% :
8I
f
I
,La
I
I
M ISC:ELLANEIIII-IS
TOTAL SET S / B F A I N T I N G STAFF
I
I
____________
4
I
I
I
356.4. (I)(
-----------------------------------l------------~---------------~--------------.
L.
S E T WATCHMEN
WATCHMON ( P / D A Y )
WATCHMAN
E X T R A WATCHMAN L A E S R
0 . T. S E T WATCHMAN
MISCELLANEOUS
I
I
45:
150. (10:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
8
I
I
I
I
I
I
.(I)
675(:).
(:I(
(I)(
.(111
&75.0(
-,---------------------------------~------------~---------------~------------T O T A L S E T WATCHMEN S T A F F
7425.
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
1o :
30o. CIO :
01
3000. (11.
I
I
I
I
(:I(
,----------------------------------I------------'---------------*--------------.
M.
FIREMEN/POLICEMEN
FIREMAN (P/DAY)
FIREMAN
POLICEMAN (P/DAY)
POLICEMAN (P/DAY)
P O LICEMAN
P O LICEMAN
E X T R A F I R E / P O L I C E LABOR
0 . T. F I R E M E N / P O L I C E M E N ( 1 0 % )
MISCELLANEOUS
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
:
250. oo :
40 :
20 :
1C I O C ) ~ .CI
5000. c:
250.00
.0
.
0 1
(1).
1S Of:) (1:
-----------------------------------I------------'---------------l--------------
TOTAL FIHEIPOLICE
STAFF
19:::
00 C!
-----------------------------------I------------'---------------l--------------
WRANGLERS
ta
t
S P C A MAN
I
H E A D WRANGLER ( P / D A Y )
WRANGLER
*
WRANGLER
TRAINER
E X T R A A N I M A L LABOR
O. T. WRANGLERS ( 10%
MISCELLANEOUS
-----------------------------------'------------'---------------i-------------T O T A L WRANGLER S T A F F
I
0.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(-1
(-1
.(1:
(11.
.Ci
.
.C .
(-1
...............................................................................
P.
TEAMSTERS (NOTE: 1 MAN F'ER ! ! ! ) : (NOTE:
. 5 / W : 1 WHOLE WEE/::)
:
CAMERA ( P/WK
10 :
22(:)(:)
.0(:):
I
I
G R I P (F/Wt<)
ELECTRII:
(P/WK
S E T C:IIINTRI-ICT IGIN ( F/Wt< )
ART DEPT (P/WK)
PROP ( P/WEEK 1
WAHDHIIIBE ( F / W K
MAKE-UP (P/WK
HONEYWAGON ( P/WK )
HONEYLJAGCIN (F'/G!!I )
:3F'EC.iAL F X (P/Wt:::)
F'ICt:::-I-IF' $:ERVICE (F'/Wt:::)
N 1GHT
1l-1141 ( 5 EIAY:; ) -s(:)%
O. T . TEfiM:3TER:3 ( 10%1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
a
I
I
I
a
t
a
II
a-.
I
I
3.4 :
8.4:
Z.4:
5:. 4 :
3.4:
:.C. t
2. 4 :
9:
L
--I
- II
a1
Page 54 of 76
.0
I
I
I
I
.(-1
.
.
.
.C'
.(1;
225)(:)0 (11
1 &.(:I0 a(:):
1&.(:I(:). (:I(] :
1600. OC) :
1 &.(:I(:). O ( j :
1Gc:)O. 0 0 :
1 &(:)(:I (:)a :
1 6.00 .(1)(1) :
1 /.<I (1.(1)(1) :
1 /-.1:) (1) .(1)(1) :
1: :1 4 (1) C) (1)(1) :
.
-
4
I
4:3[)0. (1
1:344(:).c
13440. (:
1344(:).1:
13440. i
1344(::
'
"-j : r-.
.
1 44(3(3.
s.:.-I
.~
,-., 4 (-)
1-
(;I
&7(:)0.(:,
1.2374. (:;
05.03.2007
10.
S E T r:ONI=;TRIJi:T
Page 121 of 142
IClN
DAY!:;/WEEKS
RATE
TOTAL
-----------------------------------I------------*---------------~-------------.
A.
AA.
F.
C:.
D.
E.
F.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
10.
17
13.
19.
-. LC).
21.
PRODI-KT I O N D E S I G N E R ( P / W K )
ART D I R E C T O R
ASST ART D I R E C T O R
S;k,'ETcH A R T I S T
DRAFTSMAN ( P / D Y
SET SUPERVISOR ( P / D Y )
MISC: F X / B L t I G S / t I R E S S I N G S :
MUTANT F X (sea + s o r e e t c )
BANDSTAND
PIER
SHOOT ING GALLERY
C A S T L E OF TERROR
VIC'S OFFICE
CONTAM IN A T E D BEACH
E;HER IFF S T A T I
ClN
DCiC K L E I I \ J ' S
K T L V NEWS S T A T I O N
R I C E ' S APT
LlLTR I MA INSTI TI-ITE
D I V E R ' S HOUSE
M O L L I E ' S FAR
PI-ITLER HOl-ISE
C:HARLIE'S I 2 A B I N
B A R N E Y ' S HfIiI-I:SE
R O L L E R CCiASTEF\:
WRECKED P L A N E
C:lIINTF;'CILLERf
RRlIlH
MUTANT FX MAN H%W ( P / D Y 1
R IGG ING G R I P L A B O R ( P/Wt< 1
:E;TF; 1I::1NG
BQC:K 1NGS
IIiREENS
20(:)(:).
I
I
16:
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
8
I
I
I
II
1
I
2:
2 5 ~ j (. j O :
15:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- 1
[
I
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
.I
.
4(:)(:).
3750. I
.
250. OC) :
I
4
320(:)(:).
I
1:
1:
1I
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
a>,=
4 18
8:
1 1 lcs~ro.0 0 :
1 o<)(1)0 (:I C) :
5(1)(3(1) (1(1) :
500. (:to:
.5000.i)(j:
50(1) 00 :
5 (1)(1) (1)(1) :
5 i)(:l (1) :
30(I)(:) (I)(] :
1 ooo. 00 :
300(:).
:
5000
:
500.00 :
500. ()(I) :
:I;(:)(:)(:)
(10:
80(1)(1). 00 :
20(1). ( j O :
SO(:).
:
5(:)(110 (:)(:I :
50(:).()a :
131 (:)(I) :
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
400.O.Q:
I
I
I
I
I
8
aI
I
I
t
I
aI
.
.
1 1 1 (1)(1)0
1 C) (11(1)0 .:
5~:)
(1)0 (
500. .
5(1)(1)(:) .:
5 (:I 0 .
5 (1,(1)
(
c -La (-) (-1
:30(1)(1). I
1
3 (1)(:I (1) '
5 (1)(1)
500.
5;c)O. i
:3(j00. c
S0(30.1
Zc)(:). 1
50(:).:
5 (1)(1)(1) :
c
.-I (-1
- (1)
2ts:35
2:2 (1)(11
.
.
.
.
.
.
-----------------------------------I------------*----------------l-------------
T O T A L S E T CONSTRUCT I11iN
2(:)5185.
-----------------------------------l------------;---------------l-------------
1 1.
A.
I3
C:.
1 .
E.
F.
S E T O F E R A T I N G EXPENSES:
I
I
C;
I
.
1
I
C. I
a=s
[,!&Z
;.:.
.,
.,,7
L ,
I
I
G.
H.
I
I
C:AMERA E12UI FMENT R E N T A L S

C:AMERA EI;!I-I I PMENT PI-IRCHASES
VTR F'LAYEAC:K R E N T A L
IZAMERG CRANE R E N T A L S
WARDRI:IEIC PI-1RC:HA:E;ED
;,k;iTp,Lz;
WARtfROBE MA INTENANCE
G R I P Ef;!U IPMENT R E N T E D
;-.:t-,
aI
I
I
1:
1:
1:
.-.cs ,
:>
-. ,
I
.-.
1
I
a=-
PROF' EC.!.!r-lI F'MENT R E N T E D
.=,
C.1 I C - I - . U A . ? C T ,
C.C.I-IC..:-
Page 55 of 76
.=a
t
I
t
5 (1)(1)(1) (1)(1) :
' 7 -0 0 (1)(1) :
1 5 0 (j (1)(1) :
2(:)(I)(] (](I) i
- .
.
..
.
.
.
3(>(:)(:)(:)
(:I(:)
:
c (-1-(-1
- (1)Q :
4 (1)(1) (1)(1) :
2(11(1)(1) (1)(1) :
5 (1) (1) (1) (1) :
.-I
1 C; 1-1 1 3
i-11-1
.
.
.
4 0 (1)(:I (1)
1 t.(:)i)
1 50(11
20 (1)(1) .
3(1) (1)(1)(1:
4 r_1 ,:. .
33:)(:)
1 6.(1).C,0 0 ..
4 0(:)(:)
.,
?:(
1 .?(-I [-)I-)
05.03.2007
t-..
PKLII-'::.
._.
FiENlEIl
L.
~ROFS-LI:IS::;
RND LIQMAII;E-~%
Advanced
MediaEl;!I-I
Group
M.
:I;C!l-INB
I PMENT RENTED
t\l.
WALt::I E TALI:::IES RENTEL1
Page 122 of 142
Nl-1R:I;EKY F'URI::HASE[I
AND RENTED
:
f .
MAt:zE-l-lF' Fl-lRCHA:I;ES
G!.
HA I RDFtE::::3 ING PI_IRC:HA::;E:3/RENTAL::;
:
R.
ELECTR IC:AL EI;!I_IIPMENT RENTALS
;
S.
E L E C T R I C A L EQll IPMENT F'I_~RI::HA::;ED :
T.
GASOLINE-RENTAL VEHICLES ( 1 0 x 2 ) :
U.
~3ENERATOFi RENTALS ( GAS ONLY
V.
S P E C I A L F X RENTALS/PURC:HASES
W.
PROP TRUCE RENTAL
X 1. WARTIROBE TRUCK RENTAL
XZ. SET DRESSING TRUCE RENTAL
X 3 . SET CONTSTRUCTION TRUCK RENT
:
X4. HONEYWAGON 1
t
X 5 . HONEYWAGON 2
,
X 6 . MAKE-UP THAILOR RENTAL
Y.
P I C T U R E V E H I C L E RENTALS:
Y1. BARNIE'S BOAT ( P / D Y )
Y 2 . CHARLIE'S BOAT ( P / D Y
a
Y3. DIVER'S BOAT ( P / D Y )
V4. COAST GUARD BOAT ( P / D Y )
Y5. R I C K ' S CAR ( P / D Y )
I
Y 6 . AMBULANCE ( P / D Y )
Y7. PAM'S CAR ( P / D Y )
Y8. J E S S I E ' S CAR ( P / D Y )
I
Y9. PICK-UP TRUCK ( P / D Y )
I
Y 1 0 . P O L I C E CAR ( P / D Y )
a
Y11-BARNEY'S ROVER ( P / D Y )
Y I Z . P O L I C E WAGON ( P / D Y )
t
Y13.STAN'S
CAR ( P / D Y )
Y1S. C. GUARD CAGE ( P / D Y )
I
Y16.VIC'S
BOAT ( P / D Y ) I
ZCAMERA BOAT RENTAL (F'/DY)
ZZ. M I S C RENTALS/PUHCHASES ( 5 % )
c=o
I-.
.-,
.-.
.8
-*x8
,
9
61
_I
1-1
3 1 ,
'I' I
.-'
4 (1) :
L
.
S:
.-. ,
1'1
1
I
1
I
-.a
:3 :
L*
.-I
700. c)o :
4 5 0 . 00 :
450.00 1
2000.00 :
2()0(3 ( 1 0 :
700.00 :
I
4
1t
3:
I
I
1
I
II
1:
1:
21
I
1
i
l
1
8
300. (10:
100.00 :
300.00 :
4 0 0 . 00 :
100.00:
400. 00 :
200.00:
100. 00 :
100.00:
200.00 :
100.00 :
2(:)c).0 0 :
1(:)
00(
: I.
4 0 0 . 00 :
20(:). 00 :
500.00 :
'-,
I
1:
r. I
L'
I
I
5:
1:
1:
1
1
c.
.-.
1:
1:
II
1
--,
I
L I
1:
2:
.-a
8I
TOTAL SET OPEHATI ON EXPENSES:
I(:
c
u
()(:I
3(:)00.
<I(:, :
45(:). <)(I:
.3 I
1I
1
I
--,-,----*
.
. :
:: (1) 0 (1) :
:;: .0 (1) :
-
c (-I()
-
,I
2 (1, :
.
.
1 (1)Thursday,
(1)(1) (1) (1) : November 5, 2015
/1,(:)(1,.
:
2(1) (1)(1) (1, (1) :
25(:,.00 :
2.y(1) , (1)(1) ;
4 (1)0 (1) I:( (1) :
a81.
_*
111.
2 (:I(1)(11 . (1)(11 :
. :1
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--------
.----'---------------II
I
I
tI
.----:---------------I-
-----------------,-----------------'-I------
12. LOCAT I O N :
I
I
I
I
I
I
A.
B.
C.
C1.
D.
Dl.
A I R F A R E S (NY-LA)
HOTEL-DIR/PRODUCER-NY
( P/MO 1
MEALS (PD 2 X 1 7 X 7 ) EIIR/PFC'OD NY
MEALS (PD 2 X 1 7 X 7 ) DIH/PROD N J
L O C A T I O N S I T E S RENTAL:
BANDSTAND AREA ( P / D Y )
D2. A I R F I E L D ( P / D Y )
D3. P I E R ( P / D Y )
D4. BOAT R I D E ( P / D Y )
D5. SHOOTING GALLERY ( P / D Y )
DG. CASTLE O F TERROR ( P / D Y )
D7. V I C ' S O F F I C E ( P / D Y )
D8. CONTAMINATED BEACH ( P / D Y )
D9. SHER IFF STAT ION ( P/DY
rl10. DOC t < L E I N N S ( P / D Y )
D 1 1 . K T L V NEWS S T A T I O N ( P / D Y )
F 1 2. THE DOCyI.::: ( F'.;DY )
D13. R I O K ' S APARTMENT ( P / D Y )
D14.ULTRIMA INSTITLITE (P/LIY)
D15.DIVER'!s Hlrrl-lSE (F'/EIY)
D 1 G . I I O L L I E FEES F A R ,(F/KlY)
10:
4:
3C.C'
&&.em
1
1.5;k.O. 00 :
11(1) (1)(1) (j
(1) :
100. 00-I_
.>.>qI
L.-.C
75.00
I
I
I
I
:3 :
200 ()(:I :
4 0 0 . 00:
1000. 00 :
75(:). 00 :
5(:)(?.
(10 :
75(1). (10 :
300. 00:
150(:). 00 :
10(:)5) 00 :
E:(:)0 00 :
55)(j. (jc) :
1 S(:)c). 00 :
750. (I)()
:
15(:)0. (:)(:I :
50 (3 (11(1) :
1 !
C I
.-I
I
I:
8:
1:
1:
10:
1:
4:
.i
-,
1
1
.-I
1;
<r
i
l
C' It
.-I ,
C I
Page 56 of 76
.
.
.
(->(-I
(->
I-> (-1 !
05.03.2007
Page 123 of 142
t l 1 7 . El-ITLER HI:IILI::;E
( F/DY )
[IlE:. IIHARLIE":_: [ : A D I N ( P / D Y )
I:119. C:HARLIE":i; [ICIC:~::: ( P / [ I Y )
D31. 1_7lIlNTR1]LLER.':f; Rr:l:lPl
( F / [IY
t121. ROLLER ClIlASTER ( F'/DY )
E.
El.
E2.
F.
G.
GI.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
0.
P.
Q.
R.
S.
T.
1(1)(1)(1) (1)(1) :
75 (1, (1)(1) :
:>0 (1) (1)(1) :
2(j0.(:)(:I :
1(:)(:)(:)
00 :
I
I
O F F I C E RENTAL-WILDWOOtI(P/DY
OFFIIZE El2IlIPMENT (F'/WP:)
,
E D I T RM RENT-W 1LtlWOi1t1 ( P/DY )
CAR RENTALS-2 C? 8 NO
BUS RENTALS (CREW-ROUND T R I P )
:
M I N I VANS ( 6 VEH C? 2 NO)
L A TO NY DRIVER-HOTEL h FD/DY
:
SUNDRY EMPLOYEES ( 6 P A / 10 WK')
:
E D I T O R I A L EQUIP-WILDWOOD ( F ' / M O ) :
1
G R A T U I T I E S (P/WK)
I
SCOUTING ti PRE-PRODUCT I O N
PERMITS
CREW ENTERTAINMENT
OTHER - I D L E SUN ( S X 5 5 )
OTHER
CREW HOTEL
I
OTHER - CREW P.D.
(60x56)
OTHER - I D L E SAT ( 8 x 5 5 )
OTHER - WILDWOOD PHONE (F'/WK)
:
MISCELLANEOUS
8
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
.
.
.
. (1) (1
(1)(:I )(: (:
2 25 (1) (1) (:
: : 1 (1) (1) (1)C
::
)(:
.- (I)c,:
.
. C)(.
:I:(1,(1)(1) (1)(:
- .
8(3. (110:
450. (ji):
40. 0(?:
650.00 :
1150. 00 1
8C)C).00 :
150. 00 :
250.00:
1900. 00 :
500.00 :
1500.00 :
200.00:
1000.00 :
90.00 : F .1 .
4-~:?~,':.
40.00 1
90. 00 :
900.00 :
J J
9/-.(1)(1).
OC
7650. (:I(:
c C) (1)(:
1(1)4 (11(1) (1)(:
1150 0i
96(:)(:)0(:
2 1c10. a(:
15(:)(?0.
(I(:
4275. (I(
50(?0.0(.
3000. (I(
:34(:)0.OC
100C)O.O(
3960(1.o(
104(+0C);-[)C
10400(:).
396C)(?.0 :
15300. (1
.-a
.I
C.
.
.
.
.
(!
l
e
II
I
I
--------------;--------------
-----------------------------------I-------
TOTAL LOCATION EXPENSES:
I
I
-----------------------------------I-------
I
I
.i.
543:335. (1;
--------------(--------------
I
I
13. TESTS AND RETAKES:

A.
TESTS/RETAKES- 1 DAY EA :
D I R OF PHOTOG ( P / I l Y
CAM OPER ( P / D Y )
MIXER ( P / D Y )
BOOM ( P / D Y
GAFFER ( P / D Y )
KEY G R I P ( P / D Y )
PROPMASTER ( P / t l Y )
WARDROBE ( P / D Y )
MAKE-UP/HAIR
(P/DY)
SCRIPT ( P / D Y >
PAM (P/LIY)
RICE (P/DY)
OVERT IME ( 10%
>
E. IJNDERWATER PHOTOGRAFHY:
4 ROUND T R I P TO F L O R I D A
M I A M I HOTEL ( 4 X 2 )
PER D I E M ( 2 X 2 )
CAR RENTAL ( P / D Y )
CAMERA RENTAL ( P / D Y >
INCIDENTALS ( P / D Y )
UNDERWATER D I R PHOTO ( P/DY
UNDERWATER c7AM AS:3T ( P / D Y )
E:.ECTF:IC:
(P/trY)
ELECTRIC ( P / D Y )
ELECTRIC: ( P / D Y >
GRIP ( P / D Y )
GRIP
(P/~IY)
I
I
.(1.
I
I
600.00 :
340.00 :
275.00 :
235.00 :
235.00 :
235.00 :
235.90:
235. 0(:):
235. oo :
235.00155(1).00 :
550.00 :
I
I
12(:)0. 0
k.30. 0
550. (1)
.
.
.
.
4 7(1) (11
470. (7
4 70 0
470. O
47(1) (1'
4 70 (1)
4 7(:I 0
55(:).[>
5 5 ~ 1c;.
682. c>
.C'
.
I
I
6.00. 00 :
100. 00 :
50. (I(:, :
50. (10 :
500. 90 :
2(:)(:).
<)(I
:
5(1)0 (1)c1 :
500. 0 C ) :
23:). (:)(I:
2:3(1) (I)o :
2: (1) (1)0 :
.
.
.'. - .(1)(I)
.-..- (I) .(I)(I) :
- - .
C'(-)
L ' - a
L -1:
Page 57 of 76
2400 (1)
3(:)(:)(11
2C1@.(1
1 (:I(:)
(1.
1 (1)(1) cj
4(:)0.(.:
10(I)O.(I!
1(1)(1)(1: 1.-c
n /
:
,5(-(>.
..
54.0 (1;
5 6.(1) (1;
3/.(1) (1;
.
.
.-,
05.03.2007
.
.
.

:3AFTEY 11
I VER ( F ' / l I Y )
lIlN 1I:fiMERA [I I VER ( F'/ DY )
/:::IT FEE ( F L A )
ClVERT I ME ( FLA- l O % )
N 1:~;C:ELL+?NEI~II-I~
F 1LM tc F'F;I:IC:ES;S
( :SEE ~ C I S )T
TI~ITRL TE:Z;TS AND RETAKES:
Page 124 of 142

I
t
L
I:.
,I
.L
20 :

2:E:C). (y) (1) r
5 6.(1) (1)(1)
- (11(1) ;
7k. (1) (1)(1)
5 (1) . (1)(1) :
10 0(I)(:)(:I
4.6 : (): (1)
,
0 (1)
I
I
.-I
4
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
@
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
2(1)7 5 (1) . (1)(1)
(:)(:I
-----------------------------------I------------~---------------'---------------
-----------------------------------'------------;--------------TOTAL SET LlESIGN/LOCATION/TESTS:
---------------
................................................................................
................................................................................
14. IZUTT I N G F I L M LABORATORY
: tlAYS/l-JEEES :
RATE
I
I
103&.&.87.
5C)
TOTAL
--,--------------------------------~------------l---------------~--------------I
I
I
E D I T O R (P/WK)
ASST EDITOR (P/50 HR WK)
SOUND CUTTER ( P / 5 0 HR WK)
MIASIC CUTTER ( P / 5 0 HR WK
N E G A T I V E CUTTER ( P / R E E L )
4.
E.
C.
D.
E.
tI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:2 :
--.
N E G A T I V E P I X RAW STOCK ( F / F T )
:
G.
N E G A T I V E SOUNI! RAW STOCK ( F i / F T ) :
H.
TRANSFER F I L M TO V I D E O ( P / H K )
:
I. DEV A C T I O N (NO TAX P / F T ) C! 65% :
J.
XFER SOUND (NO TAX P / F T ) @ 65% :
E. P R I N T A C T I O N ( 1 2 ( I ) K x 0 5 % ) - I N C L T A X :
L
F'R I NT SOl-lND ( 146K:<&5%
> -INCL TAX :
M.
MAGSTR IPE-PRODUCT ICiN P/REEL
I
N.
MACiSTR IPE-SCORE.~IDUEB INla/P/REEL
:
1 .
INTERNEGAT IVE
aI
P.
INTERPOS IT IVE
a
3.
hNSWER P R I N T ( I N O L TAX)
I
R.
CI:IMPI:ISITE
CHECK P T ( I N C L TAX )
:
:=7.
FADE/DISSOLVE/DUPE/FINE GRAIN
:
T.
T I T L E S - M A I N k END
aI
1-1.
PROclECT ION-W ILDWOlSD ONLY-NC@LAE :
V.
CI:[I ING-SYNC SOUND P / F T
I
W.
CClDING-W I L D TRACE P / F T
t6
X.
MOV IOLA RENTAL ( P/WK
I
I
Y.
REELS % LEADER (P/WK)
1
Z
C:UTT 1NG ROOM !::llPPL 1 ES
AA. STOIZK SHOTS
I
EB. /:::EMh SUPPLY RENTAL
Ia
CC. ED I T O R I A L CREW OVERT IME ( 10%) :
I
II
I
t
-----------------------------------'------------*---------------'-------------7-,
I 1-1 i
iz:!-!TT 1 :<:;,
1 ., ,.
- .Is;;& 7 .11fi)':
--
1(1) :
2400. 00 :
1000. 0(1):
1425. OC) :
1425.00:
53:). (10:
aI
24 :
24 :
10:
8a
F.
. h3 ~ :6
.025 :
c
-1
I
I
1257 :
(-I.-.
- - II
.:3375:
(j
-3c.I
&a%.
10 :
10:
1.11:
1.11 1
1:
..::A5 :
4C) :
1:
:3 :
1.5:
1.5:
24 :
-24:
24;
1:
15:
L,
Zz(1) (:)(I) :
7:30(:)0. (30 :
9 1000. 06 :
7:3000. 00 :
1(1)(30.o(51
:30
.
.
)(:
:EX:) 00 :
'.?50(:), (10:
C/5(:)0. 0(j:
1(:)(:I (:)I
00 :
75(:)0. 510 : -
:
12(j(jo (:I(:) :
2(j(1) C) (1) :
-5'500.00 :
c.. .-I(-)(-)
~ - e - .C)(] :
13;).
tj(:)
.
.
150.
5(j
13 1 )
3(1)(1)(1)
1y j 0 .
00:
.(j(3 :
.(1)(1) :
.0 (1) :
:
I
I
I
I
-\
-:
120000. (20 :
14(1(1(:)(:) o(j :
576.(:)0. (I(
24(j(?O.(I(.
1425(1).()I(
114(1)(j.
d.-I(-1
ec
- (-1- (1),:
(1)i:
39 1~ ( 5 . 0 ; :
350(1).Oi..
lzz(). (:)
1(j(j38. /,(:
2730. (:I(:'
24325. (:)(I;
345:::. (jC:
3(1)(1) (1)(:
E:(1)(11 (1)c;
1(115 4 5 c): (1:
10545. (I(:'
1ocjOc:). (:)(
3(3E:7 st:.
6000 ,c: (1:
12 (1)(1)0 (1)(I.
16 0(1) (1)(1:
14250. (:I(:.
14 25(j (:I(::
:.. 6 00 (I
(I)
12(2 (1) (1) -1
:: 6.(1)(1) i t r:
:30 (1)(1) (1)
2:35(1) (1) (1) (1;
11275. (:)(:I
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
*
.-,.-. L
.=..:*q
--..:.,qi
-----------------------------------'------------;---------------l---------------
Page 58 of 76
05.03.2007
(I)!T'
i

Page 125 of 142
_____--____________--.--------------'-I----------~---------------'--------_
1 5 . MI-1;:;
1 11::
II
<
0
I
FF\'ENII:H L IC:/:::-l::l~l:~;T TlIl C:lIlMF'LETE

I_II\I~IER:~C:IIIRE-I~:I~I:~T
TI] C:l:lMF'LETE
TRANSFER.:;
:sTIIIC:t:x (TAX 1NC:LIJDED)
EDITINO (P/REEL)
M I :f;rZELLANElSUS ( 5%)
A.
B.
C.
[I.
E.
F.
----,------------------------------*------------*---------------;-------------TOTAL MI-IS1C:
:
II
I
I
II
I
I
.Us-.-
1I
1I
(1):: :
1
-.:-.a
'2
.. II
10 :
I 2 (1)(11(:) (1) . (11

:3(1) (1)(1)(1) , (11
4 5 (1) . (1)
.a
.. .-I.>
c.-,c
12 (1)(1)(1)(:I
(:I :
:(I
(1)(11(1) (:) (1) :
15 (1)(1) (1) 1
15 (1)(1)(1) 0 (1) :
1(1)(1)(1) 00 :
.
.
.
.
a
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
.
.
.-t
1 (:)(1)(1)(:) (1)
(-)
(-1
1rCa140:_:.
5
-----------------------------------;------------l---------------'-------------I
1(-.
::;ilUND :
E.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Y
I .
H.
I
J.
K.
L.
M
N.
0.
P.
I!.
;
R.
S.
T.
1
1
.
Dl-ISBING ROOM RENTAL

LABOR FOR PRE-DUB,
ETC (HHS)
LAPIIR FOR DUB ( 3 M I X E R / 3 0 HR)
F'OWER S T A T I O N @ ADD 50%
SOUNF FX PACKAGE ( P / R E E L
STOCK (PRE-DUB P / R O L L I N C L T X )
STOCK (DUE P / R O L L I N C L T X )
ADR, LClOPI NG, NARRATICIN ( P / H H )
!STOCK ( RENTAL
TRANSFERS (P/HH)
STOCK INCLIJEIING TAX
L ~ I C ~ELI
P ITOR:?;
WALLA GROUP
FOLEY (SOILNTI F X / H R )
STOCK (RENTAL)
TRANSFERS ( HOURS
STOCK INCLUDING TAX
FOLEY WALKERS (HRS)
DUPE TRANSFER
STOCK 1NC:LUtIING TAX
SCREEN ING ( F/HR )
tI
I
I
A.
I
I
22;
18:
90 :
I
I
I
I
II
10 :
:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
101
10:
36 :
10:
15:
.C)2(s.b:
1:
1:
I
I
45:
1
I
aI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10:
15:
.02&.4:
36:
3:
.026G :
8:
20(j. 05, :
4 C) (1 c) :
.
(1) .c (1) :
z[;)(j(:)
.(1) :
/; (11
I
I
f-1
26.4.3 :
6 3 . 5'[3 :
250. @(I :
215. (30 :
75.00 :
3(1)(3(1)(3 (1)(1:
.:.-.
. .-,
s=(1)(1) (1) 0 :
:3(j(j(:).
00 :
2 5 (3 (1)(11:
.-,c (:)C) :
75. 00 :
3(:)(:)(5 (1) o(:) :
L O . 0~:):
75 (1)(1) :
3:0
)(1)0 (1)(3 :
.-I (-1
- (1)~:) :
.
.
L -1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.-*
- (1) .i)
5 (1)(:) (1)(11.(1)
4 4 0 (1)
7 2 (1)(11 (1)
54(:)(30.(1)
.Xs-/
A a-m
C*(-1
24.t..c
.
.
c.:35' (1.
9(1)
(1
250. c
1125. c
798. 0
35CHI (1)
3C 1 0 (1) 0
11250. CI
2 5 (3 (11
1125. (3
7.33. c:
2 16,(1) (1)
6.(1)(1) (I!
7 9 c. (-!.
4(11(1) (:!
.
.
.
a-
#-,
.
.
.
.
.C!
-----------------------------------;------------1---------------*--------------
TCITAL SI:ICIN[I:
1:34359.::
-----------------------------------+---------;---------------a-------------I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
1
I
-----------------------------------;------------s---------------t--------------
GRAND TOTAL CI_ITTING/FILM/LAB
...............................................................................
Page 59 of 76
/.7*5"39 1 9
05.03.2007

17.
Page 126 of 142
F'l-1tLIC:ITY:
G!I-/ANTI TY
I
8
A.
RRTE
T 111
T iiL
II
AKIVERT 12;I NG
I
I
E. 1-IN I T F'I-IBL IC: ITY F'ER::;l:lN
I
I
C:.
ENTERTAINMENT
I
[I.
TRA[IE/NEWSPAPER SUBSCR 1PT IONS
:
E.
PI-1BLIC:I TY ST I L L S SALARIES
I
a
F.
PI-IFL IC: I TY ST I L L S St-IPPL IES/EQI_I IP :
13.
F'I1FLIII:I TY S T 1 L L S L A B CHARCiES
I
H.
S T I L L GALLERY RENTAL/EXPENSE
:
I. TRAILER
I
.-I.
PRESS PREVIEW EXPENSE
8
1
I:::.
SUPPL IES/PnSTAC;E/EXPRESS
tI
L
MI SI:ELLANEIII-IS
I
I
M.
OTHER
I
N.
OTHER
0I
0.
OTHER
II
I
.
.
.(1
(.
(:
I
I
1I
tI
I
I
I
1
8I
I
1
1
I
8
1
1a
tI
tI
aI
I
I
I
I
I
I
. (1
a
1
4I
.-
TOTAL PUBLIC ITY:
.i
.
.
.
.
(:
(.
(.
18.
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
13.
H.
I;
MISCELLANEOUS
VACATION ALLOWANCE (DGA)
RETROACTIVE WAGE CONTINGENCY
SI-INDRY UNCLASS IF I E t I EXPENSE
CIIISTS
IN SUSPENSE ( E PEETERS)
SET COFFEE
WATER %
. .ICE
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
T I ~ T A L M I SlZELLANEl:lU!::
1F/.
1NSURANC:E/TAXE!E;/L 1CENSE/FEE!Z:
I
48
aI
I
I
I
I
I
I
.a7292 1
:
1
(.
.(:
.
(:
41
oo(:).
1 : ( 50,
aI
8:
k.CI
I
I
S:
6 (1(1 (3(:I
a
I
at
aI
aI
0I
81
t
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(I(:)
)
.
.
.
.
.O C ) :
4::: (11 0
4:30(1)
(
(
.
.(1
(.
(.
.C
19121m
CAST 1N!slJRANC:E
NEGATIVE 1NSURAblrI:E
L IFE IN:XIRANCE
M ISC:ELLANEI~I-I!~1NSI-IRANCE
I::OMF' Zc PI-IELIC: L I A B I L I T Y I N S
S1:rCIkL :3ECI-IR 1.rY T&X
F'ERSONAL PRlItPERTY 1NSLIRANIZE
W1IlRk::ER .':f; C:I]WFENSAT 1IIIN TAX
1I:IltIE C:ERT IF I C:ATE - MPAA
C I T Y TFiX AND LICENSE
1-INEMPLI:I\'MENT TAX ( I T A T E
IINEMF'LIIYPIENT TAX ( F E D )
HZrW/F'ENS ION-NAFET ( F'/EIY )
F'ENyZ;I ON F'LAN-C!IIi# ( 5 . 7(:):3%
)
8I
.t
1:
.
.i
.i
.i
-----------------------------------;------------;--------------I
(:
(.
.
.
7.5(1) (1) .
.
&.&,27:3.
?.
.
43:::45. :I:(:
(I)(I) .
.
-=,4 7.~-2
(
(
(:)
(.
.-.
j.-.
7 4 1 5 . '.
74(:)91:)
.;
7 4 5:::
Page 60 of 76
05.03.2007

F'AYROLL :!;ERVIC:E
NI::;~::ELLANEI:II-I:::
1-1.
CITHEK
F'.
OTHEFi
I:!.
OTHER
Page 127 of 142
1
N.
WA IVELI )
I
I
I
II
I
4.
II
aI
1I
I
4
----------------:------------:---------------:-------------I
TOTAL IN:SI-IF(ANCE/TAX /L IC:ENSE/FEES:
.c
.--;1 1 -: .=:1 . :.
-I._
--------------------I------------:---------------:-------------I
I
20. GENERAL 1:lVERHEAD:

I
A.
F L A T C:HARGE
I
I
E.
C:CIHF'ORATE OVERHEAD EXPENSE
I
C.
CASTING O F F I C E S A L A R I E S
II
D. ENTERTAINMENT-EXECUTIVES
,
t
I
E.
TRAVEL EXPENSE-EXECUTIVES
I
I
F.
S F F I C E RENTAL AND EXPENSE/P MO I
F1. O F F I C E R E N T A L S / S U P P L I E S / P WK
:
G. AUDITClR
I
H. T IMEKEEPER
I
I. SECRETAKI ES
8
I
.-I.
P U B L Ii: R E L A T I O N S HEAD
I
1::.
P U B L I C R E L A T I O N S SECRETARY
I
I
L.
LEGAL FEES ( P / H R )
I
M.
FOSTAGE/TELEPHONE/P W E
I
N.
CIJST1:lMS
BROKERAGE
I
I
O.
GENERAL OFF I C E OVERHEAD
eI
P.
F I L M SHIPPING
a
I
T.
OTHER
a
I
1-1.
OTHER
0I
V.
ClTHER
I
I
I
I
I
.;
TOTAL GENERAL OVERHEAD:
I
I
1I
-----------------------------------,------------:---------------:--------------21.
A.
FINANCE
S ROE I
I
I
I
I
C.
n.
Cl~lMPLETI O N Bi:lNu-Nl:l
CONT 1NGENCY
CLAIMS
I
I
I
I
I
-<.:.
C"
,1(I(:)
&
I
I
.05:
4 0(1)0 000 (10 :
.a2751
4000000. 00 :
.c)275:(4(~[~o[:)[:)(:).i)~:))
:
:33/.7.5[:)
00
2.:
.l:
I
.O
-----------------------------------:------------:---------------;--------------
206 :)00.
(I(
1 1 )(IC)C). (11,
.o(
33/-.75[:).
2:
-----------------------------------o------------:---------------:--------------.
GRAND TOTAL BELOW THE L I N E
I
I
I(:) 11(-).529;
__------------------------------------___-----------------------------------/ '7
Page 61 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 128 of 142
May 21, 1987
Stan Caterbone
Financial Management Group
1755 Oregon Pike
Lancaster, Pa. 17601
Mr.
Dear Stan:
At your request I've investigated the requirements of the Completion Bond.
Bert Schneiderman of Worldwide Completion Services in New York
has given me a figure of 5+%, excluding contingencies, with a
50% No Claims Bonus. Since Bert also owns BonBon Payroll Service
he has agreed to waive the payroll fee if we use their bonding
service,
Requirements: They need copies of the budget and/or production
board, resumes for the director and producers as well as copies
of their contracts and any other production agreements which
have been completed.
Further they need to know when we will commence principal photography, editing location and if we intend to have a distribution
deal up front.
I spoke to Jerry Vandersonde and Bill Hudson of DeWitt Stern Insurance in Los Angeles, who were recommended by Worldwide. Since
I couldn't show him a budget or a script we did some educated
guessing and came up with a figure of approximately $75,000. The
Production Package policy should include: General liability, cast
insurance, negative film, faulty stock and camera processing,
props, sets, wardrobe, rented equipment, extra expenses, third
party property damage, non-owned auto, Errors and Ommissions
including a one year bond and a minimum workmen's comp policy
for anything that is not covered by workmen's comp.
I understand you're going to Wildwood this weekend. We need to

house a crew of about 60-80, production offices, catering service.
We'd like to get as many free extras as possible and need high
quality promo type giveaways. For screen credit, of course. If
you have any such contact we'll need mutant dolls (500?) and if
you can h ~ l pbrinq dow? lor~'<cn costs that would be great. I'm
tzikrng about beaches, aricsezents, the pier, parking facilities.
p:-ob~L
p k r SCII
TY
-3
h?~?!'=
f5=* 1
Page 62 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 129 of 142
FLAT
M s . E l l e n Libman
Power S t a t i o n , I n c .
4 4 1 b7est 53rd S t r e e t
New York, N.Y. 10019
Dear E l l e n :
B a r b a r a a n d I h a v e mapped o u t a s k e l e t o n s c h e d u l e f o r o u r t r i p
t o N e w York a n d I t h o u g h t I ' d s e n d i t o f f a n d see i f i t w o r k s
f o r e v e r y o n e e l s e . By t h e way, w e ' v e d e c i d e d t o s t a y i n N e w
York u n t i l T u e s d a y i n s t e a d o f Monday a s o r i g i n a l l y p l a n n e d .
Thursday
A r r i v e a b o u t 3:OOPM. You h a v e t h e e x a c t t i m e
s i n c e y o u ' v e booked o u r f l i g h t s .
Please let
u s know i f someone w i l l p i c k u s u p o r i f w e
should take a t a x i .
W e ' l l come t o Power S t a t i o n a n ? g i v e y o u a n d
Tony c o p i e s o f t h e s c r i p t a n d b u d g e t w h i c h w e ' d
l i k e you t o r e a d Thursday n i g h t .
B a r b a r a a n d I h a v e a d i n n e r m e e t i n g w i t h a Direct o r of Photography.
Friday
Leave f o r New J e r s e y i n t h e morning. D i s c u s s

s c r i p t and budget.
Meet Mayor o f Wildwood and b r i n g him a s y n o p s i s
o f s c r i p t which h e h a s r e q u e s t e d .
Meet w i t h S t e v e G a r e l i c k , t h e P r o d u c t i o n C o o r d i n h t o r o f t h e N e w J e r s e y F i l m Commission.
Look a t l o c a t i o n s .
Saturday
Sunday
S t a n C a t e r b o n e a r r i v e s i n N e w J e r s e y . Meet t h e
r e p from Maury's P i e r t o d i s c u s s l o c a t i o n costs.
Check o u t h o t e l s f o r c r e w a n d c a s t .
Monday
L a s t m i n u t e S e t a i l s i n New J e r s e y .
L e a v e f o r Mew York a r o u n d n o o n .
M e e t i n g s a t Power S t a t i o n f o r f i n a l d i s c u s s i o n s
about s c r i p t , budget, contracts, etc.
Tuesday
Tuesday A f t e r n o o n
L e a v e N e w York a p p r o x i m a t e l y 4 F Y t o a r r i v e
L o s A n g e l e s a b o u t 9PM.
I ' l l t a l k t o you a g a i n b e f o r e w e l e a v e
i n planning your schedules.
4334 STERN M..SHERMArd OAKS. C A 91
cc: S t a n C a t e r b o n e
(616) 905-3C;7
arbara
ADVANCED MEDIA B
GROUP
Peters
Page 63 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 130 of 142
FIATBUSH
F LMS,NC.
M s . Ellen Libmn
Power Station, Inc.

441 West 53rd Street
NAJ York, N.Y. 10019

D e a r Ellen:
Let's t r y it again. This time we are scheduled to leave Los Angeles

on Thursdzy, 3~124 =id r2tu.m t3 L3s Arigsles cii T~esZa-;., 2.,z?e 9. 3.e
f o l l m h g is a rough schedule.
Arrive a b u t 3:OOPM. Please l e t us know the exact
f l i g h t information as soon as possible so we can
arrange aAprt t r a n s p r t a t i o n here. L e t us h o w
if sa-neone will pick us up in New York o r if we
should arrarge t r a m p r t a t i o n to Power Station.
Also l e t m e krvJw what hotel we w i l l be booked a t
in New York so we can leave that information here.
We'll ccrne to Power Station for any discussion
r e g a r m the s c r i p t and/or budget.
Barbara and I have a dinner meeting with a D i r e c t o r

of Photography.
Friday
Leave for New Jersey in the ~mrning. Meet with

Steve Gorelick, the Production Coordinator of the
New Jersey Film Carmission. Look a t locations.
Saturday
Stan C a t e r b n e arrives in New Jersey. Meet the rep

r a n Maury's Pier t o discuss location costs.
Check out hotels for crew ard cast.
Iast minute d e t a i l s in New Jersey.
Ieave f o r New York a m u d m n .

Meetings a t P a e r Station f o r final discussions
about script, budget, m t r a c t s , etc.
Additional meetins in mrning i f necessary.
W v e New York appr-tely
4R.I to arrive Los
Angeles about 9R1.
Please l e t m hxx if y m have any additions o r changes. I ' l l probably
talk t o w u again on Wrday.
wards,
cc: S t a n Caterb31le
Barbara Peters
Arlene
4334 STERN AVE., SHERMAN OAKS.CA 91423
(818) 995-3417
Page 64 of 76
05.03.2007
FLATBUSH
F IMS,NCl
Page 131 of 142
J u n e 1 2 , 1987
Mr. Stan Caterbone

Financial Management Group
1755 Oregon Pike
Lancaster Pa. 1 7 6 0 1
Dear Stan:
As you requested here's a schedule for Project 4 4 1 (mrking t i t l e ) :

PFE-PrnCrION
June 28-Julv 11, 1987

July 12-Sep't 5 , . 1987
New York
New Jersey
8weeks
New Jersey
8 5 day weeks
POSFPRODUCTION
Nwenber 1-January 30,1988
New York
In order to s t i l l g e t the film made this season we've got to speed everythug
W e originally planned four weeks of pre-production in New York lxlt that's
rn longer possible. If we start June 28 we've got only ten weeks to g e t t h e
mutant effects going a d then w e ' l l have to schedule mutant scenes later in
up.
the film i f they aren' t ready.

This schedule also takes us to October 31 f o r the end of the shoot, which means
we've got to schedule exteriors f i r s t , leaving the i n t e r i o r s f o r later in the
w e n t of bad weather.
S i x e we're on such a t i g h t schedule I can't r e a l l y break down the costs f o r
you because it w i l l a l l start h a p p n h g so quickly. W e ' l l imnediately have a
New York office, per dim, btel and coneacted fees f o r Barbara and myself.
W e ' ll h i r e a casting director, production manager, p r d u c t i o n coordinator ard
location manager, g e t the mutant e f f e c t s started a d begin hiring key personnel.
I f p check the m e t you'll see the actual number of weeks of employrent
f o r new. There w i l l be legal fees f o r pcepariq contracts. Wing those tm
weeks we' ll hopefully do mst of the casting.
4334 STERN A N . , SHERMAN OAKS. CA 91423

(818) 995-3417
Page 65 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 132 of 142
IXlring the eight weeks of pre-production in N e w Jersey w e ' l l be m r m

with the art director, costane designer, s e t decorator, building s e t s ,
tying d m locations, e t c
A week before shooting the f u l l crw w i l l be prepping. The editor w i l l

a r r i v e a t about t h a t lime and w i l l be mrlung on a rough cut during the
entire shooting period.
A t the close of production Barbara, the editor an3 I w i l l m e back to
New York f o r a three m n t h editing period a t the en3 of which we will
deliver the finished film, includmg d i s t r i b u t o r ' s requirements an3 the
MPAA rating.
As you can see this w i l l be very tricky but I s t i l l think we can do it

i f Barbara ard I are in New York no l a t e r than June 28.
Hope this helps.
cc: Tony Bongiovi

Barbara P e t e r s
Page 66 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 133 of 142
Advisory, Inc.
r
C-
11. 7755 Oregon Pike
Laocaster, PA 17607
777-569-4100
ftYAWCUI N A N I C r M t U I U O U P LID
PRESIDENT
May 29, 1987
Mr. Joel ~oidhammer

Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, Abbott
2 Penn Center
Suite 1800
Philadelphia, PA 19102
Dear Joel:
I received the enclosed correspondence regarding Power Station

I have yet to have a chance to review this, however,
Studio.
I thought it might be helpful.
Please keep all of this on
file as confidential and please do not make any communications
with anyone until I learn more about the situation.
Power Station does not know that I have you working on this
yet.
Good Luck.
a
Sincerely,
Stanley J. Caterbone
SJC:lmk
CC
encl
Page 67 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 134 of 142
w-
L A W O f FICES
--L
SEIDEL,G O NDA, GOLDHAMMER& ABBOTT,P. C.

PATENT A N D T R A D E M A R K A T T O R N E Y S
S U I T E 1800 TWO P E N N C E N T E R
PLAZA
P H I L A D E L P H I A . PA. 19102
ARTHUR
TELEPHONE:(PIB) 5 6 8 - 8 3 8 3
H. SEIOEL
J O E L S. GOLDHAMMER
MICHAEL P. ABBOTT
2 5 J u n e 1987
TELEX: 8 4 5 - 2 1 6
C A B L E : SIPAT
T E L E C O P I E R . ( P I S I 568- 5 5 4 9
GREGORY J. LAVORGNA
G R O U P I , I 1 6 111
DANIEL A. MONACO
R O 9 E R T H. HAMMER Ill
EDWARD C . GONOA
THOMAS J. DURLING
(1930- 1985)
STEPHEN J . MEYERS
AMANDA L A U R A N Y E *
OF COUNSEL
SYLVIA A. G O S Z T O N Y I
STANLEY H. Z E Y H E R
NANCY A. R U 9 N E R
SCOTT J . FIELDS
* D C 6 NY BARS ONLY
M r . Stanley Caterbone
FMG A d v i s o r y , I n c .
Eden P a r k I1
1 7 5 5 O r e g o n Avenue
L a n c a s t e r , PA 1 7 6 0 1
RE:
Power S t a t i o n
Our F i l e :
7351-G
Dear Stan:
C
I h a v e now r e c e i v e d t h e r e s u l t s o f a s e a r c h
I have a l s o reviewed t h e f i l e
p e r t a i n i n g t o t h e above s u b j e c t .
f o r w a r d e d w i t h y o u r l e t t e r o f May 2 9 .
T h e f o l l o w i n g i s my
a n a l y s i s and e v a l u a t i o n o f t h e r i g h t t o u s e "Power S t a t i o n " a s
d e f i n e d below.
As I understand the situation, your business c l i e n t ,
Power < t a t i o n S t u d i o , h a s , s i n c e 1 9 7 7 , o p e r a t e d a r e c o r d i n g
s t u d i o with a widely regarded reputation f o r providing high
The
q u a l i t y recording s e r v i c e s using s t a t e of t h e a r t equipment.
e n c l o s e d r e p o r t r e v e a l s t h a t Power S t a t i o n s t u d i o h a s r e g i s t e r e d
t h e t r a d e m a r k "Power S t a t i o n " f o r sound r e c o r d i n g s t u d i o s .
(See
You h a v e a s k e d m e
Reg. No. 1 , 4 3 3 , 3 2 8 r e g i s t e r e d March 1 7 , 1 9 8 7 . )
t o i n v e s t i g a t e t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f Power S t a t i o n e x p a n d i n g t h e u s e
o f i t s mark i n t o m e n ' s a n d women's c l o t h i n g i n c l u d i n g b e a c h w e a r ;
and f o r audio and video e l e c t r o n i c s f o r consumers and
I have assumed t h a t t h i s l a t t e r c a t e g o r y i n c l u d e s
professionals.
radios, television receivers, video c a s s e t t e recorders, a u d i o
r e c o r d e r s , compact d i s c players, turn tables, amplifiers,
r e c e i v e r s , t u n e r s , c o n t r o l p a n e l s , mixing b o a r d s a n d c o n s o l e s ,
among o t h e r t h i n g s .
B a s e d u p o n t h e r e s u l t s o f t h e e n c l o s e d s e a r c h , i t is
my o p i n i o n t h a t i t w o u l d b e i n a d v i s a b l e f o r Power S t a t i o n , I n c .
t o u s e i t s m a r k f o r c l o t h i n g a s a f o r e s a i d . T h e b a s i s f o r my
Page 68 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 135 of 142
25 J u n e 1987
~A
Mr.
S t a n l e y Caterbone
o p i n i o n i s R e g i s t r a t i o n No. 1 , 4 3 1 , 2 4 2 r e g i s t e r e d M a r c h 3 , 1 9 8 7
f o r "Power S t a t i o n " .
The r e g i s t r a n t c l a i m s a f i r s t d a t e o f u s e
of A p r i l 3 , 1986 f o r women's c l o t h i n g i n c l u d i n g swimwear a n d
o t h e r goods as l i s t e d .
A l t h o u g h y o u r c l i e n t h a s a s t r o n g r e p u t a t i o n , and
a l t h o u g h i t h a s p r i o r i t y of use f o r t h e mark, t h i s r e g i s t r a n t h a s
a s t r o n g p o s i t i o n f o r arguing t h a t it has superior r i g h t s f o r
women's c l o t h i n g .
One w o u l d n o t o r d i n a r i l y a s s o c i a t e c l o t h i n g i n
a n y way w i t h r e c o r d i n g s t u d i o s e r v i c e s .
Thus, your c l i e n t ' s
r i g h t s i n i t s mark d o n o t a p p e a r t o d o m i n a t e t h o s e o f t h e
registrant's.
A c c o r d i n g l y , u s e o f t h e Power S t a t i o n m a r k f o r
women's ( o r m e n ' s ) c l o t h i n g w o u l d i n v o l v e a s i g n i f i c a n t r i s k o f
being accused of trademark infringement.
Use o f t h e P o w e r S t a t i o n m a r k f o r c o n s u m e r a n d
p r o f e s s i o n a l a u d i o a n d v i s u a l e l e c t r o n i c e q u i p m e n t r a i s e s some
i s s u e s , b u t o n t h e w h o l e I am o f t h e o p i n i o n t h a t i t i s
permissible.
Again, I assume, a s I have been informed, t h a t t h e
Power S t a t i o n s t u d i o i s w e l l known a n d d o e s h a v e a g o o d
G i v e n t h a t , i t s movement
r e p u t a t i o n f o r its e x i s t i n g s e r v i c e s .
Here t h e g o o d
i n t o e l e c t r o n i c equipment s h o u l d be p e r m i s s i b l e .
w i l l a s s o c i a t e d w i t h i t s c u r r e n t s e r v i c e s c a n b e more r e a d i l y
extended to audio v i s u a l e l e c t r o n i c equipment.
T h e s e a r c h r e v e a l s t h a t M a n v i l l e C o r p o r a t i o n ' s Ken
C a r y l R a n c h i s t h e o w n e r o f t h e mark " P o w e r S t a t i o n " f o r b a t t e r y
o p e r a t e d emergency e l e c t r i c a l power s u p p l y u n i t s .
S e e Reg. N o .
1 , 0 4 0 , 3 9 8 r e g i s t e r e d May 2 5 , 1 9 7 6 a n d c l a i m i n g a f i r s t d a t e o f
u s e o f November 2 3 , 1 9 7 0 .
I n my o p i n i o n , a u d i o v i s u a l e l e c t r o n i c
equipment c a n be c o n s i d e r e d to be s u f f i c i e n t l y u n r e l a t e d t o
emergency e l e c t r i c a l power s u p p l y u n i t s t o a v o i d a l i k e l i h o o d o f
c o n f u s i o n even though t h e marks a r e i d e n t i c a l .
I r e a c h t h e same c o n c l u s i o n
a p p l i c a t i o n by E l e c t r i c a l C o n d u c t o r s , I n c .
power s t r i p .
r e g a r d i n g t h e pending
for a multiple outlet
A c l o s e r q u e s t i o n is r a i s e d b y G o u l d ' s S u p p l e m e n t a l
R e g i s t e r r e g i s t r a t i o n f o r Power S t a t i o n f o r m i n i a n d
microcomputers.
G o u l d ' s mark i s r e g i s t e r e d o n t h e S u p p l e m e n t a l
R e g i s t e r u n d o u b t e d l y b e c a u s e "Power S t a t i o n " a s a p p l i e d t o
computer equipment is considered to b e d e s c r i p t i v e .
A
Supplemental R e g i s t e r r e g i s t r a t i o n h a s none o f t h e p r o c e d u r a l
Moreover, i f
benefits of a Principle Register registration.
G o u l d ' s u s e of t h e m a r k is l i m i t e d t o a p a r t i c u l a r m a r k e t w h i c h
Page 69 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 136 of 142

A
Mr.
25 J u n e 1987
Stanley Caterbone
is d i s t i n c t f r o m y o u r c l i e n t s , t h e r e d o e s n o t a p p e a r t o b e a
likelihood of confusion.
T h u s , G o u l d may b e s e l l i n g i t s
computers i n t o a s p e c i a l i z e d commercial market i f i t is p r e s e n t l y
s e l l i n g computers a t a l l .
Next I c a l l y o u r a t t e n t i o n t o t h e f a c t t h a t s e v e r a l
r a d i o s t a t i o n s have a d o p t e d and a r e u s i n g t h e t r a d e m a r k "The
Power S t a t i o n " i n various c i t i e s throughout t h e United S t a t e s .
Conceivably, t h e s e radi'o s t a t i o n s c o u l d o b j e c t t o t h e
i n t r o d u c t i o n o f consumer e l e c t r o n i c s i n t o t h e i r m a r k e t a r e a on
t h e g r o u n d t h a t t h e u s e o f t h e s a m e mark i m p l i e s s p o n s o r s h i p b y
I n o t e t h a t a l l o f t h e s e m a r k s were r e c e n t l y r e g i s t e r e d ,
them.
and I s u s p e c t t h a t a l l of t h e s e r a d i o s t a t i o n s are r e l a t e d or
c o m m o n l y owned.
I a l s o s u s p e c t t h a t t h e a d o p t i o n o f t h i s ark
may b e o f r e c e n t v i n t a g e .
Thus, your c l i e n t i n a n y n e g o t i a t i o n
w i t h t h e s e p e o p l e would h a v e t h e a d v a n t a g e o f b e i n g a p r i o r u s e r ,
and t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p between r e c o r d i n g s e r v i c e s a n d e l e c t r o n i c
e q u i p m e n t o n t h e one hand and r a d i o s t a t i o n s e r v i c e s and
e l e c t r o n i c equipment on t h e o t h e r hand is a t l e a s t c o - e q u a l .
Thus, y o u r c l i e n t should have t h e dominant p o s i t i o n .
I n v i e w o f t h e f o r e g o i n g , i t i s my o p i n i o n t h a t T h e
Power S t a t i o n s h o u l d n o t a d o p t o r u s e "Power S t a t i o n " f o r men's
a n d w o m e n ' s c l o t h i n g , b u t i t may a d o p t a n d u s e t h e m a r k f o r
p r o f e s s i o n a l and consumer e l e c t r o n i c s a s d e s c r i b e d above w i t h t h e
u n d e r s t a n d i n g t h a t t h e m a t t e r is n o t e n t i r e l y w i t h o u t d o u b t a n d
issues could arise.
I t i s , h o w e v e r , my o p i n i o n , b a s e d u p o n t h e
f a c t s p r e s e n t l y a v a i l a b l e to me, t h a t The Power S t a t i o n , I n c .
should p r e v a i l i f those issues a r i s e .
I f you have any q u e s t i o n s c o n c e r n i n g
p l e a s e f e e l f r e e to c a l l me.
the foregoing,
With k i n d e s t p e r s o n a l r e g a r d s ,
Sincerely yours,
SEIDEL GONDA, GOLDHAMMER
& ABBOTT, P. C.
JOEL S . GOLDHAMMER
JSG:mp
Encl.
Page 70 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 137 of 142
JOINT Vf%TUilE PAKTICIPATICft AND CQflMBUTIQU
The u n d e r s i g n e d , i n t e n d i n g to be l e g a l l y bound, i n c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f h i s
adInissim as a p a r t i c i p a n t in the j o i n t v e n t u r e t o be known as "PWER PRO-
DUCTIONS I" an3 r e c e i p t o f a profit/loss d i s t r i b u t i o n s h a r e of
of
such j o i n t venture, hereby d e c l a r e s ard aclcmwledges h i s i n t e n t to participate

i n such j o i n t v e n t u r e and hereby covenants and a g r e e s to a n t r i b u t e t h e sun of
to t h e c a p i t a l o f such j o i n t venture, which sum s h a l l c o n s t i t u t e
h i s i n i t i d c a p i t a l account i n such j o i n t venture.
T h i s L e t t e r of I n t e n t is e n t e r e d i n t o by t h e u n d e r s i g n e d upon t h e
following general under stand ing :
Power P r o d u c t i o n s I w i l l be a j o i n t v e n t u r e t o be
formed u n d e r t h e l a w s of P e n n s y l v a n i a , h a v i n g t h e
.,
s p e c i f i c purpse t o i n v e s t (loan) its funds t o MUTANIA
PRODUCTIONS,
INC.
to
finance
production o f a motion p i c t u r e .
such c o r p o r a t i o n ' s
The j o i n t v e n t u r e
s h a l l r e c e i v e f u l l repayment o f i t s i n v e s t m e n t from
MUTAXIA PRODUCTIONS, I N C . b e f o r e the d i s t r i b u t i o n o f
any p r o f i t s to any party. T h e r e a f t e r , t h e j o i n t v e n t u r e
s h a l l r e c e i v e 50% o f t h e p r o f i t s from s u c h m o t i o n
p i c t u r e , o f which 85% s h a l l be d i s t r i b u t e d t o t h e
Page 71 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 138 of 142
mn-managing
joint v e n t u r e r s
i n c l u d i n g t h e under-
s i g n e z ) and 15% s h a l l be d i s t r i b u t e d t o S t a n l e y J.
C a t e r b o n e a s t h e Eanaging J o i n t V e n t u r e r o f Power
P r o d u c t i o n s I. Tbe j o i n t v e n t u r e s h a l l have a r i g h t o f
f i r s t r e f u s a l to finance t h e next movie p r o d u c t i o n o f
MUTANIA PRWKTIONS,
INC. and/or ' I W Y BONGIOVI
Tfte ckdersigned qrees t h a t he w i l l execute and d e l i v e r a counterc o u n t e r p a r t o f t h e j o i n t v e n t u r e agreement (which s h a l l be c o n s i s t e n t with the
a b o v e g e n e r a l u n d e r s t a n d i n g ) and t h a t h e w i l l execute and del'iver dl docunents required f a r t h e j o i n t venture to elect not to be t a x e d a s a p a r t n e r ship.
Contemporaneous w i t h t h e execution o f t h i s Letter o f I n t e n t , the undersigned is cmntributing 10% o f h i s total agreed c o n t r i b u t i o n , or $
r-3
w i t h i n f i f t e e n ( 1 5 ) days f r a n t h e d a t e hereof, time being o f t h e essence, t h e

-
undersigned s h a l l m n t r i b u t e t h e 90% balance, or $
Such c o n t r i-
b u t i o n s h a l l b e h e l d by S t a n l e y J. Caterbone a t i n t e r e s t , pending campletion
of alL n e g o t i a t i o n s ard execution ard d e l i v e r y of iii documents w i t h MuTA~IA

PRODUCTIa~S, INC.
I f s u c h n e g o t i a t i o n s , d e l i v e r y , and execution are mt m ~ l e t e dw i t h i n

t h i r t y (30) days a f t e r the f u l l c o n t r i b u t i o n is made, the e n t i r e c o n t r i b u t i o n ,
w i t h all i n t e r e s t earned thereon, s h a l l be returned to t h e d e r s i g n e d without
demand.
S t a n l e y J. Caterbone s h a l l ' be r e s p o n s i b l e f o r c o l l e c t i o n , receipt,
i n t e r i m i n v e s t m e n t and management, and u l t i m a t e investment or r e t u r n of a l l

f d s m t r i b u t e d , and s h a l l be t h e Managing J o i n t V e n t u r e r o f t h e j o i n t
venture.
Page 72 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 139 of 142
The u n d e r s i g n e d h e r e b y a u t h o r i z e s and anpokers S t a n l e y J. Caterbone to

n e g o t i a t e , execute, and d e l i v e r a l l d o c u m e n t s n e c e s s a r y or r e q u i r e d t o
implement t h e j o i n t v e n t u r e p u r p s e and to t a k e all other a c t i o n s an3 n q o t i a t e , execute and d e l i v e r a l l o t h e r d o c u m e n t s n e c e s s a r y
or d e s i r a b l e t o
implement or e f f e c t u a t e t h e j o i n t v e n t u r e pnpose.
SIGN
( L . S . ) Date: May
NAME:
,1987
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY:
STATE:
ZIP:
Page 73 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 140 of 142
RICHARD C. FOX, PC.

ATTQRNEYS AT LAW
1015 ROBERTj VALLEY ROAD
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA inlo

RICHARD C FOX'
('ADMn'TED ALSO FLORIDA)
May 20,
1987
S t a n l e y J. C a t e r b o n e
FMG A d v i s o r y , I n c .
Eden P a r k 11, 1755 Oregon ' p i k e
L a n c a s t e r , PA
17601
Mr.
For P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s rendered i n connection w i t h

Power P r o d u c t i o n s I , i n c l u d i n g c o n f e r e n c e , p r e p a r a t i o n o f
L e t t e r o f I n t e n t , a n d e x p r e s s m a i l i n g , .and f o l l o w - u p t e l e p h o n e
check.
P r o f e s s i o n a l Fee
8
UdP.S.
Page 74 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 141 of 142
Ted Gotnillion, President
Page 75 of 76
05.03.2007
Page 142 of 142
Gomillion: mini-major in the heart of Hollywood

O N F OF; the rtlo\r inlereclirlg
<iomillron also cpent time on

\ u c h T V \eriec as "fhe
Monroes". "Follow The Sun",
and "Jessie James".
Ted Gomillion wac the firct to
develop a mobile sound stlldio, a
specla1 trarler urlrt that 15
equipped to project "dailies"
and provide orr-locatior~"looprng".
"Our
unrque units hare
proven to be a ver) valuable aceet
arid have become a lucrati\e
\ o u r c e o f revenue."
\ard
(iomillior~,who offered that the
units habe been ured or1 Tiltnc
such as Sam Peckinpah'c "Jr
Ronner";
"Get-Away";
(it)lduy~l'\ "(ira\\tiopper".
"The Cir~ccon~
(;ango; Harhrn
Strercand'c "The blaln E \ e r ~ t " :
"Too
1 ate r h e I i e r o " ;
"Grizzly Adarns" arid "Tom
Horn". The round units have
also been used by such television
shows as "Canney
. & Lacev" and
"C'hipc"
Paramout~t and 20th ('enturq
The (joniillion Studioe facrlrFox.
The executi\c filni-milker tles are SO coniplete that each 01
spent seven years at the Fox r r c prc>ductronollicec can he (u\t
Studior, earned t w o Peahody about uced to live In while
Award\ for excellence, and was production i c in progress. kach I \
rnvolved with such notable equ~ppedu i t h a hart1 and kitchen
productions as "Rally Round area and there ic also R rectarrratlt
and
catering
f~~cilr
The Flag Pole". "State 1-arr".
"let's blake Lore". " F l a ~ i i ~ n g Addit~onally, a \ n u l l exerchc
room complete u r t h rauna.
Star" and "Way Way Out ".
By Ron Krueger
"\tarc~ol-the-art" facrlit~es in
lioll!uood IS rlie (;ornrllron
St~rdro\,Ireaded h \ lilrn ~ r ~ t l u r t r !
phrase ' n ~ i n i - r n a j o r ' . " \ard
veterarl Ted (iomrllion.
Gon~rllron rn d c t c r ~ h i n g his
The cry-hurlding cortiplex
\I\I~IOS.
prov~de\otle o l the mort techr~o(;omillron production chief
logically ad~anccdcourid \\age\
Adan1 (buck added tliar, " A l l
alorig with a 46-IIIIII
burldrng
they hare to do IS L.ortle in wrth a
contalnrng officec and editing
scrrpt and they can *alk out o f
\uites
here wrth a lir~rshedproduction.
The sound stage hac a 45-footWe have done w o r k l o r
wide. floor-to-ceilrng \creen.
cotnpaniec l'rorti all around the
ceare 150 people and i e one o l the
world, I t a l y , Mexico. The
few re-recording ctagec arourid
Philrppinet. the UK and rtlany
the world that 1s capahle o f
tnore."
handling any type o f f i l m
Ciomillion al\o taid. "LVc rake
format. including 70mrn sixgreat prrde 111 our wtirk.
track discreet. or video.
e\pec~allvnur looprr~gfacrlity lor
C o r ~ ~ p l e n ~ e r ~the
t r r ~ g\ophr\trforeign lilrnc."
cated projection sy\teni 15 an
(iornillion'c experience in the
equally advanced cout~d and
film industry cpanc 3 0 years a r ~ d
dubbing syctem which provides r t ~ c l u d e s e x p e r i e n c e
111
flexibilitv and extremely accurate
product ron and post -production
reproductron for re-recording or
at hl(;M. Drcney. rodd A - 0 .
playback o f anv eound format.
C'olu~tihia. Warner. lInlrer5al.
"We provide e\ery \errice.

frorii pre-production. cound
stage connectlone, location
\I~c>oting and
all
po\tproduction. I n other words, we
prorrde all cervicec and facilitiec
as the major jtud~oc around
town, hut at 3 fractiori o f the
co\t. That's why we corned the
Page 76 of 76
weightr and jacurr~ ts a\ailahle

lo production execirtl\es u o r k ~ r ~ g
long hours.
-<iornillion own5 all of II\
burldrngc and tand, uhlch are o n
McC'adden Place In Ilollyuood
w ~ t h ~ an short distance from
nlarl) nlajor labc, sound stagec.
Set
and c o \ t u m e rerltal
companies and an excellent breu
o f the world famou\ "t4ollymood" cigr~which trtr in a \lately
poeirron high in the tlolly\rood
Hill\.
The latect connection thar
entrepreneur (i01111111011 ha\ jet
up to round out hi\ lacllit) I\
called I'oct I'ro ( oriiplerror~ IIIL.,
*I11ct1 I\ 21 l r r l ~ l r l ~ l r kl g
lllll ~~llll\
v.III gi\c u\ a conlpic~c;Irrarlperllerlt
Good investment
"Any film\ that hake had
major filming completed and u e
feel that there i c a eood investnient, our new financial agrecmetlt will give Ciomillion the
opportunity o f linichrng the
caid
post-production."
Gomillion.
"We \\rII ccir~lrr~rrc
to cxpar~ll
and add Inore properr\, hrrt ;]I
rhe moment. ire oller O I I ~ ot the
ir~
~I v
. c r t '~IIII~I-\IIIL~I~I\'ITI the
hu\ine\\ and rrght III the r ~ l ~ ~ i d l e
01 Clollvwood."
05.03.2007

Advanced Media Group V Lancaster Film Commission June 9, 2008

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Advanced Media Group V Lancaster Film Commission June 9, 2008

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Advanced Media Group

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Thursday, November 5, 2015

CASE NO. _________

TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant