(1973-1958)
In view of the issue of nationalism and ethnicity in Pakistan, the
author has produced a noteworthy contribution in the body of
literature, which was previously marginally examined. Younas
Samad, not like other Pakistani authors who more often than none
fall for the hunt for Independence, concentrated his attention
primarily on the distressed segments of the society who were
trying to get approval for their polls apart individual agendas
before the transfer of the power.
Discussing the issue of nuisance of authoritarianism, which is
leaching the political system of Pakistan, he eloquently associated
the actions of All India Muslim League and Muslim League with
the history of authoritarianism in Pakistan. In order to make his
point unblemished, he claimed that Muslim league was not the
first choice for majority of the Muslims. The diverse humanity
which opted for the All India Muslim League, never in fact
understood neither their immediate conditions nor the proclaimed
nationalism of All India Muslim League. In nutshell, Muslim
League, in actuality, represented only the nominal section of the
Muslim Society which, regardless of the number, proved critical to
force the partition. However, due to this marginal representation,
Muslim League was confronted by the centrifugal forces of
importance before and after the partition.
The author while dissecting the political activities of few decades
before and after the partition laid the blame not only on the
Muslim league but also on the policies of the British Raj. On the
one hand, he argued how the Indian Act of 1919 legitimized the
separate tendencies and exclusive regionalism among the masses
by introducing the system of diarchy, which, unquestionably,
accommodated the indigenous demands of self-government 1.
However, this act of extension of self-government was done by
separating the provinces for hundreds of princely states 2. The act,
according to the author was never intended to create an all Indian
organization. The primary purpose of the act was to monopolize
the central government on the expense of regional loyalties.
Under these situations it was the duty of the All India Muslim
League to create Muslim national consciousness. Nevertheless the
All Indian Muslim Leagues struggle for national consciousness
lost in the long standing tribal, cast and sectarian loyalties. On the
other hand, author holds that All India Muslim League failed to
understand the ethnic and social movements, especially the
ethnic and provincial loyalties among the Muslims who were not,
in
any
case,
subcontinent.
threatened
In
the
by
the
meanwhile,
Hindu
majority
author
also
of
the
considered
1 14
2 9,14
the
centrifugal
forces
pre-partition
were
never
scenario,
eliminated
author
nor
holds
the
that
national
3 51