Review
Janine Pilcher*13,
Mark Weatherall2,4,
Kyle Perrin1,2,4 and
Richard Beasley14
1
Medical Research Institute of
New Zealand, Private Bag 7902,
Wellington 6242, New Zealand
2
Capital and Coast District Health
Board, Wellington, New Zealand
3
Victoria University of Wellington,
Wellington, New Zealand
4
University of Otago Wellington,
Wellington, New Zealand
*Author for correspondence:
Tel.: +64 4805 0147
Fax: +64 4389 5707
Janine.Pilcher@mrinz.ac.nz
informahealthcare.com
During the last decade, there have been major advances in knowledge of the effects of
oxygen therapy in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
This includes a randomised controlled trial of oxygen therapy in the pre-hospital setting, which
showed that high concentration oxygen therapy leads to a 2.4-fold increased risk of mortality
compared with titrated oxygen therapy to maintain oxygen saturations (SpO2) within a target
range of 8892%. Professional guidelines now recommend the use of supplementary oxygen
in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease only if the SpO2 is less than
88%, with titration to achieve an SpO2 of 8892%, and the delivery of bronchodilators by
air-driven nebulisation or metered dose inhaler with a spacer. The aim of this review is to
provide an overview of the evidence base that underpins these recommendations. We suggest
that their implementation will require important changes to current clinical practice in which
there is an entrenched culture of the use of high concentration oxygen therapy.
KEYWORDS: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease . exacerbation . oxygen . review
Concerns that high concentration oxygen therapy may harm patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were expressed
over 50 years ago [1,2]. Murphy et al. published
a comprehensive review of the relevant literature to 2000 and concluded that administration of high concentration oxygen can cause
hypercapnia in patients with COPD (BOX 1) [3].
Although low concentration oxygen therapy
may not adequately relieve hypoxaemia, and
cause harm in this way, the review found insufficient evidence to determine the relative risk
of death for high concentration oxygen therapy
compared with low concentration therapy in
COPD. This review highlights the key points
made by Murphy et al. and explores the
subsequent evidence available that now guides
oxygen treatment in COPD. Following
Murphy et al. review, evidence about increased
mortality in patients with exacerbations of
COPD treated with high concentration oxygen
has changed from Level 3, based on nonexperimental cohort studies at moderate risk of
bias, to Level 1b, based on a randomised controlled trial at low risk of bias [4]. The mortality
10.1586/17476348.2015.1016503
risk of high concentration oxygen administration compared with titrated oxygen therapy,
with a target oxygen saturation (SpO2) range
of 8892%, is quantified and firmly
established.
Evidence to guide oxygen therapy to
2000
In 2000, when Murphy et al. reviewed the literature, the role of oxygen therapy in COPD was
described as an area of confusion and controversy [3]. The risks of hypoxaemia were recognised by physicians, but there was uncertainty
about the appropriate fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) required for both relieving hypoxaemia and avoiding clinically relevant hypercapnia.
The key clinical questions considered in the
review are described below:
What are the perceived dangers of
hypoxaemia & at what partial pressure of
oxygen does it become dangerous?
Profound hypoxaemia causes irreversible damage to tissues, vital organ dysfunction, and
death, but the exact relationship between
ISSN 1747-6348
287
Review
Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Nyu Medical Center on 06/06/15
For personal use only.
The final conclusion of Murphy et al. [3] was that robust randomised controlled trials were needed to investigate the effects
of different concentrations of, and strategies for, oxygen delivery on clinical outcomes in patients with acute exacerbations
of COPD.
Evidence to guide oxygen therapy after 2000
Despite this call to action in 2000, it was not until 2010 that
the first high-quality randomised controlled trial of high
Expert Rev. Respir. Med. 9(3), (2015)
Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Nyu Medical Center on 06/06/15
For personal use only.
Review
Austin et al. [4] used a target range for the titrated oxygen
group of 8892% and this represents the current evidencebased target in the situation of an acute exacerbation of
COPD. However, further research is needed to determine if
even this range is, in fact, optimal. Non-experimental evidence
suggests that the upper SpO2 limit should probably not be
above 95%, as a higher level was associated with a greater risk
of acidosis in hypercapnic patients in one study [38], and longer
hospital stays, higher rates of non-invasive ventilation, and
increased admission to a high dependency unit in another
Table 1. Mortality in patients with an acute exacerbation of COPD, randomised to high concentration
oxygen versus titrated oxygen therapy in the pre-hospital setting [4].
All patients
Confirmed COPD
Titrated group
p-value
21/226 (9%)
7/179 (4%)
0.42 (0.200.89)
0.02
11/117 (9%)
2/97 (2%)
0.22 (0.050.91)
0.04
Extract from a Table published by Austin et al., 2010 [4] and reproduced with permission from BMJ.
High concentration oxygen: High flow oxygen treatment (810 l/min) administered via a non-rebreather face mask and bronchodilators delivered by nebulisation with
oxygen flows of 68 l/min.
Titrated oxygen: Oxygen treatment delivered by nasal cannulae to achieve oxygen saturation between 88 and 92%, with concurrent bronchodilator treatment
administered by nebuliser driven by compressed air, delivered via a face mask over the nasal cannulae.
Confirmed COPD: A subgroup with a definite diagnosis of COPD, as defined by national guidelines, based on a retrospective review of medical records, including lung
function data in the 5 years prior to study entry.
COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
informahealthcare.com
289
Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Nyu Medical Center on 06/06/15
For personal use only.
Review
A definite diagnosis of acute exacerbation of COPD can be difficult in the acute pre-hospital setting [49,50]. The main difficulty is distinguishing this from acute severe asthma [49]. It is
therefore relevant to consider the effect of high concentration
oxygen therapy on PaCO2 in this clinical situation. A number
of trials show that high concentration oxygen therapy increases
the risk of hypercapnia in severe asthma [5153]. In one study,
290
Another key finding from Austin et al. study [4] is that more than
half of the patients with confirmed COPD who were assigned to
the titrated oxygen regimen received high concentration oxygen
at some time during their pre-hospital ambulance transfer. This
major protocol violation occurred despite an extensive training
programme of ambulance paramedics prior to the study and
ongoing supervision within the context of a randomised controlled trial. This is likely due to an entrenched culture of health
professionals to administer high concentration oxygen to breathless patients with exacerbations of COPD even when this is not
recommended by evidence-based guidelines. This culture is not
limited to ambulance paramedics and also occurs with hospitalbased medical and nursing staff [3840,49,50,60,61]. It will require
major integrated educational and management initiatives to
change the practice, so that those who administer oxygen recognise that oxygen is a drug that is prescribed for defined indications, in which its benefits outweigh its risks, that prescriptions
specify the dose and method of delivery to achieve a specified
SpO2 target to avoid both hypoxaemia and hyperoxaemia, and
that the patients response to oxygen therapy is monitored.
A greater insight into the beneficial physiological characteristics
of the oxyhaemoglobin dissociation curve is also required to
underpin the rationale for this approach to oxygen therapy [62].
Expert Rev. Respir. Med. 9(3), (2015)
Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Nyu Medical Center on 06/06/15
For personal use only.
Review
Expert commentary
Key issues
.
There is Level 1b evidence that acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) should be treated with titrated
oxygen therapy to achieve an oxygen saturation target of 8892%, thereby avoiding the potential risks of both hypoxaemia
and hyperoxaemia.
In acute exacerbations of COPD, there is a 2.4-fold increase in the risk of death if patients receive high concentration oxygen therapy,
compared with titrated oxygen therapy.
The increased mortality is likely due to increased partial pressure of carbon dioxide; however, other mechanisms may include hyperoxaemia
causing reduced coronary blood flow or myocardial reperfusion injury, or rebound hypoxia if oxygen therapy is abruptly stopped.
Further research is needed to determine if the 8892% target saturation range for oxygen therapy is optimal (e.g., compared with
8590% or 9095% ranges).
Exposure to high concentration oxygen therapy is avoided by delivering bronchodilators by air-driven nebuliser or metered-dose inhaler
with a spacer rather than an oxygen-driven nebuliser.
If there is diagnostic uncertainty with acute severe asthma, it is preferable to administer oxygen therapy as if the patient is having an
acute exacerbation of COPD and therefore may be at risk of oxygen-induced hypercapnia.
High concentration oxygen therapy may also lead to an increase in partial pressure of carbon dioxide in a number of other acute and
chronic respiratory disorders, including severe asthma, community-acquired pneumonia, obesityhypoventilation syndrome, and acute
lung injury.
Appropriate use of oxygen therapy requires a practice change by health professionals who administer this potentially life-saving but also
life-threatening therapy.
informahealthcare.com
291
Review
References
12.
Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Nyu Medical Center on 06/06/15
For personal use only.
2.
3.
..
4.
..
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
13.
292
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
38.
39.
Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Nyu Medical Center on 06/06/15
For personal use only.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
..
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
54.
55.
56.
57.
informahealthcare.com
58.
53.
Review
293