of Commercial Starches
Analytical Working Party of the Starch
Experts Group (STEX) of the European
Starch Associations (ESAY
For the EC starch regulation 2169/1986 a minimum purity of 97%
starch on dry substance is required to obtain the new end-use
refunds. Three different methods for the determination of starch
were tested. Two polarimetric methods (EC L123/72, AOAC
14031-032) and an enzymatic merhod (EC L158/86) were used to
determine the high starch content of commercial unmodified starches. The results of a ring test between six laboratories shows that
the AOAC method, solubilizing the starch in the presence of calcium
chloride, has the smallest standard deviation. An explanation for the
differences observed between the three methods is given, based on
the sugar spectrum of the hydrolyzed starch. An independent ring
test in France shows a modified enzymatic method, developed by
AFNOR (the French standards organization) produces satisfactory
results.
1 Introduction
Table 1.
Starch Content (dry basis) of Commercial Starches (%).
On 1st July 1986 a new E C starch regime came into force whereby
substantial refunds are given for starch used in certain agnculturally unprotected applications (EC regulation 2169/86).
In order to qualify for the new end-use refunds, a minimum
purity of 97% starch o n a dry substance basis is required.
Consequently it is essential to have an analytical method that
allows the measurement of this high starch content in a reliable,
reproducible and accurate way. The Starch Expert Committee
of the European Starch Associations decided to take a critical
look at existing methods. All the methods chosen were intended to some extent to measure the relatively low starch content
of various starch containing products.
To meet the high purity requirements of 97% on a dry basis, the
standard deviation of the applied method should be less than 1%.
To evaluate the accuracy and repeatability between different
laboratories, the Starch Industries organised a ring test amongst
some of its members. The methods tested were:
1) Ewers method
EC L123172
2) Calcium chloride method
A O A C 14031-32
3) Enzymatic method
E C L1.58186
The methods were evaluated by analysis of the starch content of
wheat starch, potato starch and maize starch (Tables 1 and 2).
The analyses were carried out in triplicate by 2 o r 3 analysts
within one laboratory and repeated on the same samples by
different laboraties. The results were collected and the statistics
were calculated according to the A O A C Statistical Manual [ 11.
Method
Wheat
Maize
Potato
Ewers
00
98.94
0.36
2.07
98.67
0.48
1.41
100.68
0.58
1.73
CaCI?
00
ax
97.26
0.30
1.11
97.84
0.28
0.83
98.88
0.40
1.05
Enzymatic
00
97.45
1.53
4.06
97.68
1.84
3.69
99.78
I .46
4.90
OX
OX
00
= repeatability
OX =
standard deviation
reproducibility standard deviation
Table 2.
Non-Starch Components Perccntages on Dry Basis.
Product
Protein
I S 0 3188
Wheat starch
Maize starch
Potato starch
0.16
0.33
0.10
Method
Ash
Total lipids
I S 0 3593 after hydrolysis
CIRF 8.14
0.25
0.07
0.21
0.31
0.51
0.02
2 Principles
2.1 Ewers method EC L123/72
The method consists of a double determination. The sample is first
heated with diluted hydrochloric acid. By heating, the starch is gelatinized and by the action of hydrochloric acid the starch is hydrolyzed to
smaller oligosaccharides and glucose as is shown in Fig. 1. After
clarification and filtration the rotatory power is measured by polarimetry. Secondly, a sample is extracted with 40% ethanol. The
414
* Participants:
0038-9056/87/1212-0414$02.50/0
Flg.
Fig 2
Fig. 3
Wheat
Maize
Potato
AFNOR
97.78
0.47
98.60
0.34
98.36
0.91
(3X
4 Conclusion
415
Bibliography
[ l ) Youden, W. J.,and H . Sreiner: AOAC Statistical Manual 1975.
[2] Ewers, E. : Ztschr. f . offentliche Chemie 14 (1908), 150-157.
[3] Witikler, S.,and G . Luckow: StarchlStarke 19 (1967), 110-115.
[4] Dudas, F.. Starch/Starke 28 (1976), 127-129.
F . : StarcNStarke 26
157-159.
[6] Dudas, F.: StarchEtarke 23 (1971), 390-393.
[7] Dudas, F.: StarchlStarke 24 (1972), 367-369.
[8] Dudas, F.: StarchlStarke 22 (1970). 385-388.
Correspondence to: MI. E. Moreels. Amylum N . V., Burchtstraat
10, B-9300 Aalst (Belgium).
(Received: May 6, 1987).
1 Einleitung
416
Die Starkeabtrennungen wurden aufgrund ihres orientierenden Charakters im Laboratoriumsmarjstab mit Erbsen bzw.
Erbsenmehlen (vermahlen in einer Schlagkreuzmuhle) durchgefuhrt.
0038-9056/87/1212-0416$02.50/0