CASE INFORMATION
Investment ($18 million) outlay would be spent over two calendar years:
2007
2008
$2 million
$16 million
Operating saving:
(buying shortwood) ( cost of producing shortwood)
2007
Future
$2 million
$3.7 million
2009
2010
2011
2011
2012
$4
million
$10
million
$10
million
$10
million
$10
million
$10
million
Tax : 40%
Depreciation based on straight line method for 6 years, without salvage value.
PROBLEM INDENTIFICATION
1. What will the current WACC be?
2. Whether the expected benefits were enough to justify the $18 million capital outlay
plus the incremental investment in working capital over the six year life of the
investment?
DATA ANALYSIS
1. Calculate weighted average cost of capital (WACC).
2. Calculate Net present value (NPV), Internal rate of return (IRR), Modified internal
rate of return (MIRR).
3. Final decision.
DATA ANALYSIS :
CASH FLOW
Based on calculation above, found positive valuable cash flow from t=1= t 2008 until t=6= t
2013 except on t=0 = t 2007. Capital investment is in year 2007 and 2008. In cash
flow terminal, NOWC had can be reacquired.
(WPC), firm capital come from equity and debt which measures heavy cost this capital with
rightly. WACC that high shows that the company spend sum that is fairly large to increase
capital, which means that company can become risky. On the other hand, WACC that low
show that the company gain lower capital. Following is WACC calculation to WPC case
DATA ANALYSIS: OUTDATED WACC
Worldwide Paper Company has a company policy to use the corporate cost of capital
(WACC) to analyse investment opportunities. WACC is 15%. Worldwide Paper Company
also has not change its WACC in 10 years.
NPV = ( $2,089,490) ( Negative )
NPV < 0
Investment = Loss
DATA ANALYSIS: UPDATED WACC
Component of equity
Bank loan payable
500
2500
Total debt
3000
Component of equity
Shares outstanding
500
24
Total equity
1200
3000/15000
= 0.2
Cost of debt
5.78%
12000/15000 = 0.8
Cost of equity
= rfr + b (rpm)
Beta
1.10%
Market premium
6%
4.6%
Tax rate
40%
NPV = FCF/(1+r)^t
CF = Cash Flow
r = Rate Of Return
t = Time/Years
This following is the calculation of NPV for the case of Worldwide Paper Company:
WACC = r = 9.6536 %
YEAR
FCF
PV of CF
t=0, 2007
(16,000,000.00)
(16,000,000.00)
t=1, 2008
480,000.00
437,742.13
t=2, 2009
3,900,000.00
3,243,536.71
t=3, 2010
4,500,000.00
3,413,059.27
t=4, 2011
4,500,000.00
3,112,582.96
For Blue
Ridge Mill
t=6, 2013
$
6,580,000.00
$
3,785,197.35
they has
Net Present Value (NPV):
$
830,678.18
two
choices,
namely whether to produce itself "shortwood-site" or purchased at open market. Based on
calculation that has been made, Prescott choose to produce "shorwood-site" itself.
t=5, 2012
4,500,000.00
2,838,559.76
DECISION
To determine whether this project could be accepted or rejected is by comparing IRR
value with WACC or NPV. If larger IRR value from WACC value and larger NPV value from
0, so the project acceptable and if on the other hand the project need rejected.
Based on analysis on-side longwood woodyard project, NPV = $830,678.13,
NPV value is more than zero. By the rule, investment for the on-side longwood
woodyard project should continue after regard benefit return that is good from capital
outflow as much as $18 million. Expected benefits are enough to justify the $18 million
capital outlay plus the incremental investment in working capital over the six year life of the
investment. So the Worldwide Paper Company should invest in the new longwood
woodyard.