Brisbane, Australia
30 June 4 July 2008
XX
III
Selected presentations
from the
www.spah.com / www.intervet.com
Introduction
XX
III
3
18
38
Rudolf Hein
22
7
Maternal immunization
with Netvax against clinical
and subclinical necrotic
enteritis in broiler chickens
27
Dr. Luciano Gobbi
10
Linnea Newman, DVM, ACPV
Canadian broiler performance
using Netvax, a Clostridium
perfringens type A toxoid for
necrotic enteritis control under
commercial production
14
Joan Schrader, DVM, ACPV
Association of Clostridium
perfringens type A alpha-toxin
with lesions of necrotic enteritis
evaluated by monoclonal
antibody test strips and
Immunohistochemistry
40
30
Linnea Newman, DVM, ACPV
Unexpected coccidiosis
multiplication patterns under
various broiler management and
coccidiosis control programs
35
Greg F. Mathis, PhD
Epidemiology of coccidiosis
in vaccinated turkeys based on
oocyst shedding patterns
43
Ian Tarpey, PhD
Future poultry vaccines:
A 15-year perspective
45
Contacts
Summary
E Y
O I N T S
Introduction
Enterotoxins of
C. perfringens are believed
Methods
XX
III
fibrinonecrotic lesions
Trial vaccine
(100%)
22-28 days
Mortality (%)
Field efficacy of Netvax, a Clostridium perfringens type A toxoid breeder vaccine, in preventing
mortality due to necrotic enteritis in broilers
Standard
22-28 days
6.5
6
5.5
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
.5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Trial vaccine
(100%)
22-28 days
Standard
22-28 days
Mortality (%)
Figure 1. Weekly mortality at 22 to 28 days was lower in the trial group of broilers from toxoid-vaccinated
hens than in standard broilers from unvaccinated hens.
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Figure 2. Average total mortality by placement week was lower in the trial group of broilers from
toxoid-vaccinated hens than in standard broilers from unvaccinated hens.
Discussion
XX
III
References
1
Conclusion
Summary
E Y
O I N T S
In trials conducted in
two European countries,
Netvax, an innovative
Clostridium perfringens
type A toxoid for control of
necrotic enteritis (NE), was
administered to hens to
determine if they would
convey protective immunity
to their progeny.
Introduction
XX
III
No C. perfringens-associated gut
lesions were observed in chickens from
vaccinated hens. In contrast, 5.7% of
controls from one site and 17.8% of
controls from the other displayed lesions
and C. perfringens was isolated in gut
samples taken when NE was suspected.
of C. perfringens alpha-
toxin antibodies.
Vaccinates
Controls
-2
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Maternal immunization with Netvax against clinical and subclinical necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens
P=0.008
4
3.5
Controls
Mortality (%)
Vaccinates
P=0.1466
P=0.985
2.5
2
P=0.003
P=0.312
1.5
1
.5
0
W = Week
W30 site 1
W35 site 1
W45 site 1
W27 site 2
W32 site 2
Figure 2. Mortality, shown below at various weeks (W) throughout the study, was somewhat higher among controls
compared to birds from hens vaccinated against C. perfringens.
References
1
Ibid., 56-57.
Summary
E Y
O I N T S
Introduction
10
Canadian broiler performance using Netvax, a Clostridium perfringens type A toxoid for necrotic enteritis control
under commercial production
The processor initially placed two sequential, completely ABF flocks on the same
farm that had produced the NE mortality
pattern described above. The broilers were
progeny of toxoid-vaccinated Ross 708
hens. The producer used the same live,
non-attenuated coccidiosis vaccine for
coccidiosis control (Coccivac-B,
Intervet/Schering-Plough Animal Health)
as before. The initial two flocks used a
highly digestible starter feed formulation
followed by a wheat-based broiler ration
that included animal proteins. Farm
management was closely monitored by
the consulting veterinarian, with daily
weights monitored by in-house scales.
No antibiotics, including ionophores,
were used in either flock.
Methods
Results
11
XX
III
100
90
80
Medicated program
ABF program
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41
Days of age
Figure 1. Daily mortality of ABF toxoid-progeny flocks vs. conventional medicated feed flocks grown on the same
farm in side-by-side houses during the same time period.
2500
2000
Medicated flocks
Weight (grams)
ABF flocks
1500
1000
R708 STD
500
0
1 4
7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40
Days of age
Figure 2. Weight gain of ABF toxoid-progeny flocks vs. medicated program flocks grown on the same farm in
side-by-side houses during the same time period.
12
Canadian broiler performance using Netvax, a Clostridium perfringens type A toxoid for necrotic enteritis control
under commercial production
1
0.9
0.8
Medicated
ABF
NE break
Mortality (%)
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
1
10
13
16
19
22
25
28
31
34
37
Days of age
Figure 3. The daily mortality pattern of toxoid-progeny ABF flocks vs. conventional medicated flocks grown on the
same farms. The NE break occurred because non-toxoid progeny were accidentally placed in an ABF house.
Discussion
13
References
1
E Y
O I N T S
Immunohistochemistry of NE lesions
clearly demonstrated a positive binding of
antibodies developed against the Netvax
vaccine, one component of which is
C. perfringens type A alpha-toxoid.
Introduction
vaccine (Netvax).
14
Association of Clostridium perfringens type A alpha-toxin with lesions of necrotic enteritis evaluated by monoclonal antibody test
strips and immunohistochemistry
Score
Description
No lesions
Non-specific enteritis or subclinical NE. Thin and flaccid intestinal wall; excess or thickened mucus;
no loss of mucosa; mild reddening or congestion of serosal blood vessels
Fibrinous necrotic debris on the muscosal surface adhering to the intestinal wall (Turkish towel) or
dead animal with NE gross lesions scored 3 or above
15
Results
XX
III
Lesion score
Challenged (%)
33
25
67
21
25
25
33
18
19
60
37
88
71
16
Association of Clostridium perfringens type A alpha-toxin with lesions of necrotic enteritis evaluated by monoclonal antibody test
strips and immunohistochemistry
1 or 2
0% (0/7)
0% (0/7)
67% (6/9)
0% (0/9)
67% (6/9)
56% (5/9)
Discussion
17
References
1
Summary
E Y
O I N T S
Introduction
performance.
18
Methods
19
coccidiosis, disease
appropriate management
and therapeutic response.
XX
III
Lesion score **
Study interval and fixed initial weight
0.5
1.5
(14-20)
904
76.5
70.2
60.6
48.7
40.7
(28-34)
2096
92.6
72.2
54.3
38.2
27.3
(42-48)
3398
97.3
61.0
32.7
10.0
-7.0
904
124
148
151
154
281
(28-34)
2096
187
215
218
222
308
(42-48)
3398
281
311
308
304
315
904
386
364
342
318
300
(28-34)
2096
562
516
477
444
420
(42-48)
3398
701
628
570
522
482
904
16
22
37
35
(28-34)
2096
24
30
57
81
86
(42-48)
3398
38
57
94
122
130
904
188
170
149
121
100
(28-34)
2096
274
210
162
119
87
(42-48)
3398
305
191
110
49
-0.9
904
0.64
0.60
0.38
(28-34)
2096
0.54
0.37
-0.04
(42-48)
3398
0.43
0.10
-0.49
Table 1. Coccidiosis mediated lesion score effects upon broiler average daily gain, maintenance energy (ME)
expenditure, ME consumption, added energy lost in excreta, retained energy and feed efficiency at equalized initial
weights* during 6 days after coccidial challenge.
*Values created using predictive models (R 2 >.95) and standardized initial weights.
**Mixed lesion scores were utilized for all variables except gain/feed, where
homogenous arrays of 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 were applied.
20
References
1
Ibid.
Ibid.
21
The
Summary
E Y
O I N T S
Calorimetry chambers
were used to quantify the
performance and energetic
effects of coccidiosis.
Introduction
Methods
22
23
3.0
XX
III
2.86
2.5
2.31
2.18
1.92
2.0
1.55
1.5
1.0
0.51
0.43
.5
0.44
0.35
0.16
0
20 27 34 41 48
20 27 34 41 48
20 27 34 41 48
LESION
AGE
Figure 1. Mean lesion score of coccidiosis free (lesion group 0) , subclinical (lesion group 1) and clinically infected
groups (lesion group 2).
100
96
90
90
90
83
78
80
60
71
55
51
46
45
39
40
24
23
20
-3
0
-20
LESION
20 27 34 41 48
20 27 34 41 48
20 27 34 41 48
AGE
Figure 2. Daily weight gain of coccidiosis free (lesion group 0), subclinical (lesion group 2) and clinically infected
(lesion group 2) groups.
24
0.8
0.67
0.66
0.65
0.60
0.58
0.6
0.55
0.52
0.50
0.45
0.41 0.42
0.4
0.30
0.28
0.2
0.16
-0.04
0.0
-0.2
20 27 34 41 48
20 27 34 41 48
20 27 34 41 48
LESION
AGE
Figure 3. Feed efficiency of coccidiosis-free (lesion group 0), subclinical (lesion group 1) and clinically infected
(lesion group 2) groups.
300
300
277
250
235
231
204
192
200
195
177
160
141
150
121
100
120
88
81
76
20 27 34 41 48
20 27 34 41 48
20 27 34 41 48
50
0
LESION
AGE
Figure 4. Daily maintenance energy expenditure of coccidiosis free (lesion group 0), subclinical (lesion group 1)
and clinically infected (lesion group 2) groups.
25
XX
III
105
100
90
91
80
80
60
57
40
34
27
21
18
20
36
30
25
17
11
-13
-8
20 27 34 41 48
20 27 34 41 48
20 27 34 41 48
-20
LESION
AGE
Figure 5. Energy added to excreta over that anticipated by dietary metabolizable energy value for the coccidiosis
free (lesion group 0), subclinical (lesion group 1) and clinically infected (lesion group 2) groups.
Conclusion
References
26
Summary
E Y
O I N T S
in-feed anticoccidials.
27
Introduction
The vaccine used in the trial was Paracox5, a live, attenuated anticoccidial vaccine.
It is based on precocious genetic lines of
Eimeria acervulina, E. maxima (two lines),
E. mitis and E. tenella. The vaccine was
administered in the hatchery with a spray
cabinet to all birds in the trial at 1 day
of age.
Different parameters and operational
conditions were considered and judgments
about vaccine efficacy were based on
clinical observations such as mortality,
culling rate and coccidiosis outbreaks, as
well as performance data such as daily
weight gain (DWG) and feed conversion
ratio (FCR). Weight gain following natural
coccidial challenge provides definitive
evidence of immunity to coccidiosis, which
is further supported by the FCR.
XX
III
Results
continued
FCR
Mortality (%)
Breaks
2.502
1.867
5.20
E. ace. +; E. max.
++; E. ten. (rare)
2.530
1.822
4.50
None
Management best 10
2.490
1.853
5.00
Management worst 10
2.394
1.930
6.50
Breed/line A
1.698
1.769
3.01
Breed/line B
1.741
1.701
2.80
2.419
1.874
6.57
Antibiotic therapy no
2.348
1.956
7.48
Parameter/condition
Table 1. Numerical effects of management, bird genetics and antibiotic therapy on bird health status and
flock performance.
28
The effect of different management conditions on the productivity and health of broiler birds vaccinated with the
anticoccidial vaccine Paracox-5
Discussion
29
A comprehensive approach
to vaccine management is
needed to achieve success
References
1
Conclusion
Summary
E Y
O I N T S
Introduction
30
Methods
Discussion
Results
31
XX
III
100000
80000
60000
40000
20000
0
7
10
13
16
19
22
25
28
31
34
37
Days of age
Figure 1. Sequential fecal oocyst counts taken in 2007 based on samples taken after the US reintroduction of
clopidol demonstrate true coccidiosis control.
2006
nicarbizinnarasin
2006
salinomycin
100000
80000
60000
40000
20000
0
7
10
13
16
19
21
24
27
30
33
36
Days of age
Figure 2. Average fecal oocyst counts 2006 (nicarbazin-narasin) vs. 2007 (salinomycin) on five-year reused litter.
Note the early 19-day peak, regardless of the program.
32
100000
High density
salinomycin
Low density
salinomycin
90000
80000
70000
60000
50000
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
7
10
13
16
19
21
24
27
30
33
36
Days of age
Figure 3. Sequential fecal oocyst counts from moderate broiler density vs. low broiler density on reused litter.
Higher density produced lower/earlier oocyst peaks.
100000
Vaccine
(2 houses)
reused litter
90000
80000
70000
60000
50000
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
8
13
19
25
31
37
Days of age
Figure 4. Sequential fecal oocyst counts from long-term live, non-attenuated coccidiosis vaccine use.
33
Conclusion
XX
III
References
1
34
Summary
E Y
O I N T S
This epidemiological
Introduction
35
Methods
XX
III
25000
20000
Oocysts/gram
Orally dosed
15000
10000
Sprayed
5000
0
2
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
Days of age
Figure 1. Oocyst shedding patterns in turkeys either orally dosed or sprayed with the coccidial vaccine Coccivac-T.
36
37
Sharp reductions in
OPGs after the major peak
indicate that coccidial
immunity had developed.
References
1
E Y
O I N T S
Innovax-ND-SB is a
recombinant vaccine for
Methods
Introduction
38
Newcastle disease (ND) efficacy in broilers vaccinated at 1 day of age with the recombinant HVT/F(ND): Innovax-ND-SB
challenged by the intramuscular and ocular routes with the Mexican virulent ND virus (NDV) genotype V Chimalhuacan strain
Results
39
Discussion
References
1
Summary
E Y
O I N T S
Innovax-ILT, a commercially
available, recombinant vaccine
based on the herpesvirus of
turkeys (HVT), was developed
to help prevent infectious
laryngotracheitis (ILT) and
Mareks disease in chickens.
Introduction
Study results
40
A novel HVT-based recombinant vaccine (Innovax-ILT) to simultaneously control infectious laryngotracheitis and Mareks
disease in chickens
100
80
Vaccinates
60
40
Controls
20
vMD
ILT
vMD
Subcutaneous route
ILT
In ovo route
Figure 1. Efficacy of Innovax-ILT against Mareks disease (MD) and infectious laryngotracheitis (ILT), single
in ovo administration.
100
80
Vaccinates
60
40
4-week-old controls
20
0
10 weeks
20 weeks
30 weeks
40 weeks
Subcutaneous route
41
10 weeks
In ovo route
Discussion
XX
III
42
Summary
E Y
O I N T S
Introduction
43
Advanced knowledge
XX
III
Conclusion
44
Contacts
Rudolf Hein
rudolf.hein@sp.intervet.com
45
Netvax and Paracox are registered trademarks of Schering-Plough Animal Health Corporation. Innovax is a registered trademark of Intervet.
2008, Schering-Plough Animal Health Corporation. All rights reserved. SPAH-PBU-508.