Result
The LTARP proces facilitates as per
default:
Reporting of the EOL candidates
in a report or in XLSX, with the Yr.
of replacement and characteristic
date for monitoring and ordering.
Findings during the various steps
with respect to requirements for
additional EOL condition
assessment, lacking spares as
per incomplete RCM,
modifications of trend findings and
alike are denoted by means of an
action list..
Hi alert findings are also reported
in this list and can be extracted by
means of a separate code if
required
Additional management reporting
are supported by means of the
export in XLSX format, providing
flexibility as required.
Conclusions
LTARP uses the ISO 15686 and the
NEN 2767 as a common framework
for End Of Life condition assessment
and documented, traceable End Of
Life calculations. As shown in this
application note, these findings apply:
The 7 steps incorporated in the
work process, facilitate a review
and upgrade of current
operational condition assessment
procedures and related prediction
methods.
Lacks in spares, acceptance
criteria, asset tree configuration
are encountered and denoted by
means of an action list, that is an
integral part of the LTARP
process.
LTARP therefore fits in the
already operational processes,
since it uses the results and helps
to upgrade the processes as part
of an improvement process.
It therefore completes already
operational processes for RCM,
RBI and compliance.
AS
Figure 1: Heat exchanger: Level III prediction of asset tube condition with time.
End Of Life
criterion
Explanation
The End Of Life (EOL) in this
particular case of a tubular
heat exchanger, is assessed
by means of a level II
approach by determining: