of genitourinary fistula
JEFFREY L. CORNELLA, M.D.
Mayo Graduate School, Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic,
Scottsdale
Fistula secondary to neglected obstetrical labor
became uncommon with the advent of modern obstetrical care
in the industrialized world. The goals of modern medicine must
be to provide access to sound obstetrical care and to reduce
iatrogenic fistula rates to the lowest extent possible. Proven
techniques used in a thoughtful manner must be employed to
correct fistulae with minimal recurrence and adverse sequelae.
This chapter discusses genitourinary fistula secondary to operation, obstetrical events, malignancy, and irradiation.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT
Surgical technique in extirpative surgery involves identification of vital structures and their subsequent
mobilization from the tissues to be resected. The initial step
in all pelvic operations is identification of the ureters. Symmonds (7) has noted that the simple total abdominal hysterectomy is the most common procedure performed prior to
the occurrence of genitourinary fistula. The time of unrecognized bladder injury is frequently during the dissection of the
bladder base from the underlying cervix and upper vagina. At
hysterectomy, wide, sharp dissection of the bladder from the
cervix and upper vagina is essential. Blunt dissection should
not be performed in this area, as the non-scarred tissue
responds easily to sharp dissection and scarred tissue will predispose to injury of the bladder. The bladder should be dissected one centimeter beyond the planned line of resection
(8). The surgeon must pay careful attention to the fine characteristics of the tissue, ascertaining tissue planes, bladder
thickness, evidence of bladder thinning, and any suggestion of
vascular compromise. Atraumatic handling of bladder tissue
and sparing use of cautery will decrease potential for injury.
Sound surgical principles of exposure, optimal lighting, visualization, and traction should be employed. If there is a question of bladder wall thinning, the bladder may be filled with
indigo-carmine dyed saline to further answer this question. If
reinforcement is required, it should be accomplished with
fine-gauge delayed absorbable sutures, paying attention to
any possibility of vascular compromise and the position of the
PREVENTION
PREVENTION
VESICO-VAGINAL
VESICO-VAGINAL FISTULA
FISTULA SECONDARY
SECONDARY TO
TO OPERATIVE
OPERATIVE INJURY
INJURY
78
Chapter 22
79
Figure 3. The usual fistula resulting from operation is located on the posterior wall of the bladder
above the interureteric ridge
(From Lee RA. Atlas of Gynecologic Surgery. Figure 404, Page 280. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, 1992. Reprinted by permission of the author and publisher.)
Endometriosis, which obliterates the peritoneal surface of the bladder with dense adhesions to the cervix
and uterus at hysterectomy, should be approached in
an extraperitoneal fashion. The bladder peritoneum is
dissected from the bladder followed by extraperitoneal
dissection of the bladder from the vagina and area of
the cervix. The vagina is then entered anteriorly at the
junction of the cervix and the rectum mobilized inferiorly after incision of the posterior vagina. Depending
upon the extent of disease, the ureters may require dissection and lateral mobilization from the vesicouterine
ligament.
Thompson (6) notes that patients with a history of
subtotal abdominal hysterectomy often have distortion
of the bladder over the area of superior peritoneal closure. At the time of trachelectomy, this area may be
predisposed to injury due to dense attachment of the
bladder to the cervix on more than one plane (6). Careful sharp dissection and separation is required.
The patient who presents with fluid
leaking per vagina following surgery warrants careful
and thorough examination. Fistulas may be noted
immediately following surgery or there may be a delay
of ten to twenty days. Most commonly it is noted in the
first ten to twenty days (6). It is incumbent for every
patient to have a thorough history and examination of
the vaginal vault and pelvis when presenting to the
urologist or gynecologist. The physician should assess
RECOGNITION
RECOGNITION
Figure 4. Sharp dissection or flap-splitting dissection results in mobilization of tissues and decreased
tension on subsequent suture lines
(From Lee RA. Atlas of Gynecologic Surgery. Figure 406 Page 281. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, 1992. Reprinted by permission of the author and publisher.)
80
Chapter 22
for possible urine loss per urethra, urine loss per vagina, or
genito-urinary discharge masquerading as incontinence.
Patients should be examined with bladder filling, stress testing
in the standing and supine positions, careful vaginal examination, and possible dye testing. The vault is carefully examined
with a speculum scrutinizing the vaginal cuff and urethra. In
patients with a history of hysterectomy, a cotton-swab is used
to probe folds at the cuff and the patient is asked to cough
during visualization as a method of increasing bladder pressure. If the patient still has a uterus, the vault is examined for
copious watery discharge passed per endocervical canal. The
amount of the urine loss will depend on the size and location
of the fistula and any concomitant urethral sphincter incompetence. It may also depend on the possibility of bladder irritation and loss secondary to uninhibited bladder contractions.
There have also been patients with occult fistula presenting
with urinary incontinence that have undergone incontinence
operation without recognition of the fistula. Postoperative
continued leakage may be attributed to failed surgery or
detrusor instability and the fistula remains unrecognized. If
the patient gives a history of continuously dripping urine, an
occult fistula should be considered. The patient should undergo
the three-tampon test of Moir (6). Indigo-carmine dyed saline Figure 5. The fistula scar is excised converting the opening into fresh injury
is placed within the bladder and three gauze pledgets are (From Lee RA. Atlas of Gynecologic Surgery. Figure 407, Page 282. W.B. Saunders,
placed within the vagina using a ring forceps. The patient is Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1992. Reprinted by permission of the author and publisher.)
asked to walk, take stairs, cough,
do deep-knee bends, and void
over a period of twenty minutes.
The pledgets are then examined.
The lower pledget will be dye
stained from voiding and/or loss
of urine from the urethra. If the
middle pledget is stained in its
upper portion or if the deepest
pledget is stained, a fistula should
be suspected. A colposcopic
examination of the vagina then
follows to inspect the vaginal
apex. If the upper pledget is wet
but not stained, a ureterovesical
fistula should be suspected.
Patients may have an injection of
indigo-carmine intravenously to
aid in the determination of the
presence of a ureterovesical fistula or a complex fistula. A retrograde study of the ureters to rule
out additional fistula should be
performed even if a vesicovaginal
fistula is readily apparent. The
gauze pledget test should be done
Figure 6. The initial suture line consists of 4-0 delayed absorbable suture placed in a extramucosal fashion
in situations where a fistula is sus(From Lee RA. Atlas of Gynecologic Surgery. Figure 408, Page 283. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1992. Reprinted by
pected, but the patient has had a
permission of the author and publisher.)
81
Figure 7. The initial suture line is inverted with similar suture. Each suture line inverting the previous suture
line is placed 3 to 4 mm lateral to the initially closed suture line.
(From Lee RA. Atlas of Gynecologic Surgery. Figure 409, Page 283. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
1992. Reprinted by permission of the author and publisher.)
Figure 8. The peritoneum is pulled from the posterior surface of the bladder for interposition
between the bladder and vagina
(From Lee RA. Atlas of Gynecologic Surgery. Figure 410, Page 284. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, 1992. Reprinted by permission of the author and publisher.)
82
Chapter 22
Elkins et al. (13) has noted that there are three types
of repairs to manage the fistula tract: excision, freshening the edges without full excision, and wide mobilization of the bladder and vaginal tissues. Collis (14)
first described wide mobilization of tissues in 1861.
Many surgeons through the decades, including Symmonds (8), Lee e. al. (5), and Tancer (15), have emphasized its importance. Symmonds (8) stressed the
importance of tension free closure and adequate
excision of scar in order to decrease risk of failure.
Thompson (6) believes that all simple vesicovaginal
fistulas should be closed via the vagina, yet many
articles in the urologic literature, unlike the gynecologic literature, emphasize primarily an abdominal
or transvesical approach. In Lee et al.s (5) large
series of vesicovaginal fistulas, of which 82% were
postsurgical, 80% were approached vaginally with a
98% cure rate (5).
Elkins et al. (13) described excision of the fistula tract uniformly in small and medium size fistulas. Mayo and Walters (16)
described the multiple-layer closure of the bladder in crossing
directions. Elkins et al. (13) describe its use in small fistulas at
any site. In larger fistulas (>4 cm), crossing closure may not be
83
Figure 11. The initial extramucosal closure of the vaginal portion of the fistula followed by a second layer
closure.
(From Lee RA. Atlas of Gynecologic Surgery. Figure 414, Page 287. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
1992. Reprinted by permission of the author and publisher.)
A great
deal of the urologic literature on vesicovaginal
fistula repair centers on the abdominal approach.
There are appropriate times to perform an abdominal
approach to fistula, however if this is the surgeons frequent,
ABDOMINAL APPROACH TO SUPRA-TRIGONAL FISTULA
Figure 12. The bladder is closed in an extramucosal fashion and the stents removed.
(From Lee RA. Atlas of Gynecologic Surgery. Figure 415, Page 287. W.B. Saunders,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1992. Reprinted by permission of the author and publisher.)
84
Chapter 22
There is more urinary tract literature on laparoscopic injury than laparoscopic repair of such
LAPAROSCOPIC CONSIDERATIONS
Figure 14. A skin flap is placed into the va gina. Alternatively, a Martius flap may be
utilized via a tunnel into the vaginal
wound.
(From Lee RA. Atlas of Gynecologic
Surgery. Figure 403, Page 279. W.B. Saun ders, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1992.
Reprinted by permission of the author and
publisher.)
85
86
Chapter 22
Neo-urethras can be constructed from either vaginal or vesical flaps. Elkins et al. (34) reported use of a modification of
neo-urethra construction from a vesical advancement flap.
He noted that Tanagho and Smith developed the method
from earlier work by Flocks and Culp. The bladder is separated from the vaginal wall posteriorly. The anterior and lateral fistula edges are dissected from the pubic bone beneath
Figure 16. The vaginal mucosa is mobilized laterally and a portion of the
roof of the remaining urethra is mobilized for reconstruction.
(From Lee RA. Atlas of Gynecologic
Surgery. Figure 395, Page 275. W.B.
Saunders, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
1992. Reprinted by permission of the
author and publisher.)
87
the arch of the pubic ramus. The anterior bladder wall is dissected free and advanced into the vagina for urethral tubularization. Eighteen out of twenty patients in Elkin et al.s (34)
report experienced closure of the fistula. Reflective of the difficulty of the repair in achieving function in the majority of
patients, only eleven patients experienced complete recovery
of genitourinary function. Problems which may persist after
surgery include urinary incontinence, vaginal stenosis, amenorrhea, and dyspareunia.
In developed countries, urethral fistulas may result from foreign body necrosis, traumatic forceps deliveries, direct injury
in urologic endoscopy, vaginal surgeries, and urethral surgeries such as diverticulum removal. Symmonds and Hill (38)
reported on 50 patients with traumatic loss of much or all of
the urethral floor and bladder neck. This group of patients
had been subjected to 94 unsuccessful operations. Surgical
reconstruction consisted of creating a small-caliber neourethra from contractile tissue in the urethral roof and reinforcement of the anterior vaginal wall by a myocutaneous
labial skin flap similar to that described by Noble (39) (Figures
15-18). A percentage of these patients were anticipated to
have a delayed urethrovesical suspension. Forty-four percent
of the patients in the series had a myocutaneous flap or bulbocavernosus muscle flap. Twenty patients required a second-
88
Figure 18. The third layer of sutures is placed into the cervicopubic fascia to plicate the
urethra and bladder neck further
(From Lee RA. Atlas of Gynecologic Surgery. Figure 397, Page 277. W.B. Saunders,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1992. Reprinted by permission of the author and publisher.)
Chapter 22
stage urethrovesical suspension. Seventy-four percent of patients (39) were cured and eight percent were greatly improved over a five to fifteen year follow-up.
Lee et al. (5) reported 53 patients with urethrovaginal or urethrovesicovaginal fistulas during a period of review from 19701985. Sixteen patients were referred for injury sustained from
anterior colporrhaphy, thirteen from diverticulectomy, six
from radiation therapy, three from vaginal hysterectomy and
repair, three from forceps rotation, three from trauma, and
the remainder from miscellaneous procedures. Fourteen of
these patients had failed one attempt at repair and two
patients had failed two attempts at repair prior to their referral. Forty-seven (92%) fistulas were repaired on the initial
attempt and four were successfully repaired on the second
vaginal operation. During the 15-year period of this report,
24,883 patients underwent major gynecologic operations by
the division of gynecologic surgery at the Mayo Clinic. Only
five patients developed fistulas (0.020%) of which three were
urethrovaginal. Only one patient developed a ureterovaginal
fistula, which was a result of a radical hysterectomy for postirradiation recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.
21. Kadar N, Lemmerling L. Urinary tract injuries during laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy: causes and prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170:47-48.
URETEROVAGINAL
URETEROVAGINAL FISTULA
FISTULA
RADIATION
RADIATION INDUCED
INDUCED FISTULAS
FISTULAS
7. Symmonds RE. Incontinence: vesical and urethral fistulas. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1984;
27(2):499-514.
8. Symmonds RE. Prevention and management of genitourinary fistula. JCE Obstet
Gynecol 1979; 21(06):13-24.
9. Tancer ML. Observations on prevention and management of vesicovaginal fistula
after total hysterectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992; 175:501-506.
10. Pettit PD, Petrou SP. The value of cystoscopy in major vaginal surgery. Obstet
Gynecol 1994; 84(2):318-320.
11. Blajvas JG, Heritz DM, Romanzi LJ. Early versus late repair of vesicovaginal fistulas: vaginal and abdominal approaches. J Urol 1995; 153:1110-1113.
12. Woo HH, Rosario DJ, Chapple CR. The treatment of vesicovaginal fistulae. Eur
Urol 1996; 29:1-9.
13. Elkins TE, Drescher C, Martey JO, et al. Vesicovaginal fistula revisited. Obstet
Gynecol 1988; 72:307-312.
14. Collis MH. Further remarks upon a new and successful mode of treatment for vesicovaginal fistula. Dublin Q J Med Sci 1861; 31:302-316.
15. Tancer ML. The post-total hysterectomy (vault) vesicovaginal fistula. J Urol 1980;
123:839-840.
16. Mayo CH, Walters W. The operative treatment of vesicovaginal fistulas. Surg Clin N
Am 1924; 4:399-406.
17. Latzko W. Postoperative vesicovaginal fistulas. Am J Surg 1942; 58:211-228.
18. OConor Jr VJ, Sokol JK, Bulkley GJ, et al. Suprapubic closure of vesicovaginal fistula. J Urol 1973; 109:51-54.
19. Brandt FT, Lorenzato FR, Albuquerque CD. Treatment of vesicovaginal fistula by
bladder mucosa autograft technique. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186:645-648.
20. Falk HC, Kurman M. Repair of vesicovaginal fistula: report of 140 cases. J Urol 1963;
89:226-231.
22. Quinlan DJ, Townsend DE, Johnson GH. Transvaginal repair of bladder lacerations
during LAVH. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1995; 3(1):103-107.
23. Lee C, Lai Y, Soong Y. Management of urinary bladder injuries in laparoscopic
assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996; 75:174-177.
89
tula formation and the multifaceted morbidity of maternal birth trauma in the developing
world. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 51(9):568-574.
25. Menchaca A, Akhyat M, Gleicher N, et al. The rectus abdominis muscle flap in a
combined abdominovaginal repair of difficult vesicovaginal fistulae: a report of three
cases. J Reprod Med 1990; 35(5):565-568.
34. Elkins TE, Ghosh TS, Tagoe GA, et al. Transvaginal mobilization and utilization of
the anterior bladder wall to repair vesicovaginal fistulas involving the urethra. Obstet
Gynecol 1992; 79(3):455-460.
26. Hoskins WJ, Park RC, Long R, et al. Repair of urinary tract fistulas with bulbocavernosus myocutaneous flaps. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63:588-593.
35. Kelly J. Vesico-vaginal and recto-vaginal fistulae. J Royal Soc Med 1992; 85:257-258.
27. Elkins TE, DeLancey JOL, McGuire EJ. The use of modified martius graft as an
adjunctive technique in vesicovaginal and rectovaginal fistula repair. Obstet Gynecol
1990; 75:727-733.
28. Symmonds RE. Loss of urethral floor with total urinary incontinence: a technique
for urethral reconstruction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969; 103:665.
29. Kanavel AB. Plastic procedure for the obliteration of cavities with noncollapsible
walls. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1921; 32:453.
30. Salup RR, Julian TB, Liang MD, et al. Closure of large postradiation vesicovaginal
fistula with rectus abdominis myofascial flap. Urology 1994; 44:130-131.
31. Evans DH, Madjar S, Politano VA, et al. Interposition flaps in transabdominal vesicovaginal fistula repairs: are they really necessary? Urology 2001; 57:670-674.
32. Rangnekar NP, Imdad AN, Kaul SA, et al. Role of the Martius procedure in the management of urinary-vaginal fistulas. J Am College Surg 2000; 191:259-263.
33. Arrowsmith S, Hamlin EC, Wall LL. Obstructed labor injury complex: obstetric fis-
90
36. Emembolu J. The obstetric fistula: factors associated with improved pregnancy outcome after a successful repair. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1992; 39:205-212.
37. Hamlin RHJ, Nicholson EC. Reconstruction of urethra totally destroyed in labour.
Br Med J 1969; 2:147-150.
38. Symmonds RE, Hill LM. Loss of the urethra: a report on 50 patients. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 1978; 130:130-138.
39. Noble CP. The new formation of the female urethra: with report of a case. Am J
Obstet Gynecol 1901; 43:170.
40. Selzman AA, Spirnak JP, Kursh ED. The changing management of ureterovaginal
fistulas. J Urol 1995; 153:626-628.
41. Koonings PP, Huffman JL, Schlaerth JB. Ureteroscopy: a new asset in the management of postoperative ureterovaginal fistulas. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80:548-549.
42. Boronow RC. Management of radiation-induced vaginal fistulas. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 1971; 110:1-8.