Widener University ,
Published online: 20 Nov 2008.
To cite this article: David M. Hall MSEd (2006) A Review of The New Gay Teenager,
American Journal of Sexuality Education, 1:3, 83-88, DOI: 10.1300/J455v01n03_06
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J455v01n03_06
expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
RESOURCE REVIEWS
83
84
Resource Reviews
85
to explain that gay does not have a concrete meaning, he insists that gay
has a broad definition yet acknowledges that he cannot define it: A
modern teen can also act gay, although exactly what that means is
anyones guess (p. 7).
As if he has discovered a new phenomenon, Savin-Williams declares
that queer youth have a disconnect between their behavior, identity, and
sexual orientation. Seemingly unaware that this has been common
across time, he glowingly compares gay teens, who he argues reject
labels, with their pre-labeled, pre-identified grandparents, whom he
contends lived without labels but did not live is self-deception or repression (p. 5). However, these grandparents were typically in the closet as
a result of the consequences of coming out. The world in which they
lived was a time during which there was only the smallest movement on
behalf of gay rights and discrimination failed to even warrant national
discourse. That Savin-Williams would hold this homophobic era up for
praise powerfully demonstrates his blind drive to prove his thesis.
Savin-Williams continuously critiques the limitation of sampling in
research. Much of this valid criticism raises valuable questions about
creating a representative sample. However, he misunderstands why behavior or identity are typically studied. In fact, he critiques virtually all
research on queer youth by stating, After half a century of research, we
still cant agree on how to count gay people (p. 24). This lack of agreement is because researchers study what can be measured. Orientation
cannot be measured, but behavior and identity can be measured though
the ways in which this occurs will vary among studies.
In his critique of researchers who study those who identify as gay,
Savin-Williams laments, I find this very puzzling. If one wants to
know about female development, one does not sample only self-identified feminists. . . . If one wants to know about same-sex desires, why
sample only gay-identified individuals? (p. 180). This analogy does
not withstand examination. The category of gay-identified individuals allows the study of a specific sexual orientation. In contrast, the
sole category of self-identified feminist would interfere with a study
of women. Furthermore, self-identified feminists references a certain
socioeconomic and political view of the power structure in society. In
contrast, one can be gay-identified and be an active member of the
Green Party or a conservative Republican.
A disturbing quality of this book is that at times the author borders
on blaming the victim for harassment and a sense of helplessness. He
portrays gay youth who defy the stereotype as the teens who are truly authentic individuals, referring to gay teens who are not so flamboyant,
86
who have been freed from the mandate to categorize themselves (p. x).
He repeatedly criticizes researchers for focusing their studies on those
who supposedly fit stereotypes, which he broadly categorizes as virtually
anyone who identifies with a sexual minority label. He even argues that if
the research is true about gay youth committing suicide, rather than examining the pain and isolation of the closet, this seems to prove to many
that when comparing gay and straight teens, One population is normal
and the other is not (p. 179).
Savin-Williams saves some of his sharpest criticism for adult allies
of gay youth, who he argues, create a culture of labels and victimization,
portraying gay youth as weak and defenseless (p. 179). He argues that
this problem has two roots. First, early studies by the mental health field
focused on poorly adjusted queer youth. Second, too many reports come
from those who identify as gay during adolescence, and Savin-Williams
argues that this population will have disproportionately negative results. He cites little and unconvincing research to demonstrate this
contention, but even if he is correct, these teens need support and safe
spaces.
In criticizing the nurturing environment that queer youth are finding in
some spaces, Savin-Williams underestimates the activism of gay youth
by stating that adult allies provide students with Gay Straight Alliances
and other support networks. Additionally, Savin-Williams clearly misunderstands the legal parameters of Gay Straight Alliances. Indeed, a school
could create a Gay Straight Alliance, but it is typically students who form
chapters. In fact, teachers do not necessarily have the legal power to do
so. Under the Equal Access Act of 1984, a law intended to allow Christian clubs to meet that now serves as the legal precedent allowing the formation of Gay Straight Alliances; this right to form such clubs is based on
the club and its meetings being student-initiated (Haynes & Thomas,
2002). Indeed, there are over 2,000 Gay Straight Alliances in American
high schools, because those teens who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersexual, queer, questioning, and allies have the courage to demand that their schools allow them to create this space.
Savin-Williams cites highly suspect research stating that gay youth
encounter only five percent of their school population responding negatively to their sexual orientation. In contrast, the Gay, Lesbian and
Straight Education Networks 2003 National School Climate Survey
reveals that over ninety percent of youth surveyed heard negative words
like fag and dyke frequently or often, and four out of five reported
hearing those remarks from most of the students in their school. Seventy-five percent of students surveyed felt that they were unsafe in
Resource Reviews
87
88
REFERENCES
Haynes, C.C. & Thomas, O. (2002). Finding Common Ground: A Guide to Religious
Liberty in Public Schools. Nashville: First Amendment Center.
Kosciw, J.P. (2003). The 2003 National School Climate Survey: The School-Related
Experiences of Our Nations Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth. New
York: Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network. Retrieved on August 22, 2005
from http://www.glsen.org.
Savin-Williams, R.C. (2005). The New Gay Teenager. Cambridge: Harvard University
Press.
Summer, C.J. (Ed.) (2004). Student Organizations. GLBTQ: An Encyclopedia of Gay,
Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Culture. Retrieved on August 22, 2005
from http://www.glbtq.com.
RECEIVED: 08/28/05
ACCEPTED: 11/27/05