Conflict Definition

Competitive or opposing action of incompatibles : antagonistic state or

action (as of divergent ideas, interests, or persons)
Mental struggle resulting from incompatible or opposing needs, drives,
wishes, or external or internal demands.
An active disagreement between people with opposing opinions or
principles

Conflict Theories
Social conflict theory is a Marxist-based social theory which argues
that individuals and groups (social classes) within society have differing
amounts of material and non-material resources (such as the wealthy vs.
the poor) and that the more powerful groups use their power in order to
exploit groups with less power.
Conflict theory emphasizes the role of coercion and power in producing
social order. This perspective is derived from the works of Karl Marx,
who saw society as fragmented into groups that compete for social and
economic resources. Social order is maintained by domination, with
power in the hands of those with the greatest political, economic, and
social resources. When consensus exists, it is attributable to people being
united around common interests, often in opposition to other groups.
Marx theorized that the work of producing consensus was done in the
"superstructure" of society--which is composed of social institutions,
political structures, and culture--and what it produced consensus for was
the "base," the economic relations of production (Read more about
Marx's theory of base and superstructure here). Following on the heels

of Marx, Italian scholar and activist Antonio Gramsci argued that

consensus to rule is achieved in large part through cultural hegemony,
which refers to the dominant group's ability to attain consent to their rule
through ideas, norms, values, and beliefs.
According to conflict theory, inequality exists because those in control
of a disproportionate share of societys resources actively defend their
advantages. The masses are not bound to society by their shared values,
but by coercion at the hands of those in power. This perspective
emphasizes social control, not consensus and conformity. Groups and
individuals advance their own interests, struggling over control of
societal resources.
Those with the most resources exercise power over others with
inequality and power struggles result. There is great attention paid to
class, race, and gender in this perspective because they are seen as the
grounds of the most pertinent and enduring struggles in society.
Whereas most other sociological theories focus on the positive aspects
of society, conflict perspective focuses on the negative, conflicted, and
ever-changing nature of society. Unlike functionalists who defend the
status quo, avoid social change, and believe people cooperate to effect
social order, conflict theorists challenge the status quo, encourage social
change (even when this means social revolution), and believe rich and
powerful people force social order on the poor and the weak.
Conflict theorists, for example, may interpret an elite board of regents
raising tuition to pay for esoteric new programs that raise the prestige of
a local college as self-serving rather than as beneficial for students.
Whereas American sociologists in the 1940s and 1950s generally
ignored the conflict perspective in favor of the functionalist, the

tumultuous 1960s saw American sociologists gain considerable interest

in conflict theory. They also expanded Marx's idea that the key conflict
in society was strictly economic. Today, conflict theorists find social
conflict between any groups in which the potential for inequality exists:
racial, gender, religious, political, economic, and so on. Conflict
theorists note that unequal groups usually have conflicting values and
agendas, causing them to compete against one another. This constant
competition between groups forms the basis for the ever-changing nature
of society. Critics of the conflict perspective suggest that it glosses over
the complexities and nuances of everyday life and relationships of
power.

DEFINITION of 'Conflict Theory'

A theory propounded by Karl Marx that claims society is in a state of
perpetual conflict due to competition for limited resources. Conflict
theory holds that social order is maintained by domination and power,
rather than consensus and conformity. According to conflict theory,
those with wealth and power try to hold on to it by any means possible,
chiefly by suppressing the poor and powerless. Conflict theory also
ascribes most of the fundamental developments in human history, such
as democracy and civil rights, to capitalistic attempts to control the
masses rather than to a desire for social order.
BREAKING DOWN 'Conflict Theory'
Conflict theory has been used to explain a wide range of social
phenomena, including wars and revolutions, wealth and poverty,
discrimination and domestic violence.
The financial crisis of 2008-09 and the subsequent bank bailouts are
good examples of real-life conflict theory, according to authors Alan

Sears and James Cairns in their book A Good Book, in Theory.

Conflict theory proponents view the financial crisis as the inevitable
outcome of the inequalities and instabilities that plague Western
societies, since the present structure of the global economic system
enables the largest banks and institutions to avoid government oversight
and take huge risks that only reward a select few. Sears and Cairns note
that large banks and big business subsequently received bailout from the
same governments that claim to have insufficient funds for large-scale
social programs such as universal healthcare. This dichotomy supports a
fundamental assumption of conflict theory, which is that mainstream
political institutions and cultural practices favor dominant groups and
individuals.

Conflict theory
In sociology, conflict theory states that society or an organization
functions so that each individual participant and its groups struggle to
maximize their benefits, which inevitably contributes to social change
such as political changes and revolutions. The theory is mostly applied
to explain conflict between social classes, proletariat versus bourgeoisie;
and in ideologies, such as capitalism versus socialism.
While conflict theory successfully describes instances where conflict
occurs between groups of people, for a variety of reasons, it is
questionable whether this represents the ideal human society. Although
some theorists, such as Karl Marx, have claimed that growth and
development occur through the conflict between opposing parties,
cooperation is also a source of healthy growth. It needs to be determined
under which situations, if any, conflict is necessary to produce change,
as compared to those under which cooperation and harmony lead to the
greatest advances.
Conflict theory

The history of conflict theory can be traced back to thinkers such as

Machiavelli or Thomas Hobbes, both of whom viewed humanity
cynically. In its current form, conflict theory attempts to refute the
functionalist approach, which considers that societies and organizations
function so that each individual and group plays a specific role, like
organs in the body. There are radical basic assumptions (society is
eternally in conflict, which might explain social change), or moderate
ones (custom and conflict are always mixed). The moderate version
allows for functionalism to operate as an equally acceptable theory since
it would accept that even negative social institutions play a part in
society's self-perpetuation.
The essence of conflict theory is best epitomized by the classic "pyramid
structure" in which an elite dictates terms to the larger masses. All major
social structures, laws, and traditions in the society are designed to
support those who have traditionally been in power, or the groups that
are perceived to be superior in the society according to this theory.
Conflict theorists would argue that all groups in society are born from
conflict. An example might be that of labor unions, which are developed
to fight for the interests of workers, whereas trade organizations are
made to fight for the interests of the moneyed classes. This theory of
groups is opposed to functionalism in which each of these groups would
play a specific, set role in society. In functionalism, these groups
cooperate to benefit society whereas in conflict theory the groups are in
opposition to one another as they seek to better their masters.
"It is in the interests of those who have wealth to keep and extend what
they own, whereas it is in the interests of those who have little or no
wealth to try to improve their lot in life."[1] This can also be expanded to
include any society's morality, and by extension their definition of
deviance. Anything that challenges the control of the elite will likely be
considered "deviant" or "morally reprehensible." The theory can be
applied on both the macro level (like the U.S. government or Soviet
Russia, historically) or the micro level (a church organization or school

club). In summary, conflict theory seeks to catalog the ways in which

those in power seek to stay in power.
In understanding conflict theory, competition between social classes
plays a key part. The following are four primary assumptions of modern
conflict theory:
1. Competition: Competition over scarce resources (money, leisure,
sexual partners, and so on) is at the heart of all social relationships.
Competition rather than consensus is characteristic of human
relationships.
2. Structural inequality: Inequalities in power and reward are built
into all social structures. Individuals and groups that benefit from
any particular structure strive to see it maintained.
3. Revolution: Change occurs as a result of conflict between social
class's competing interests rather than through adaptation. It is
often abrupt and revolutionary rather than evolutionary.
4. War: Even war is a unifier of the societies involved, as well as war
may set an end to whole societies.
Conflict theory was elaborated in the United Kingdom by Max
Gluckman and John Rex, in the United States by Lewis A. Coser, and
Randall Collins, and in Germany by Ralf Dahrendorf, all of them being
less or more influenced by Karl Marx, Ludwig Gumplovicz, Vilfredo
Pareto, Georg Simmel, and other founding fathers of European
sociology.
Marx and conflict theory
Karl Marx argued that property is upheld by the state, making property
struggles into political struggles between owners and renters, capitalists
and workers, and other groups. Material conditions determine the ability
of any of these groups to organize effectively politically. These material

conditions are also what enable one group to propagate their views to
others in society. Because the owners clearly have an advantage in
material wealth, their views are spread more easily.[2]
For Marx, the conflict clearly arises because all things of value to man
result from human labor. According to Marx, capitalists exploit workers
for their labor and do not share the fruits of these labors equally. This
exploitation is what allows the owning classes to dominate politically
and to impose their ideology on the workers of the world.[3]
Weber and conflict theory
Max Weber refined Marx's conflict theory. Weber stated that more than
one conflict over property existed at any given moment in any given
society, which is more nuanced than Marx's theory that the only struggle
of importance was that between owners and workers. Weber included an
emotional aspect of conflict as well:
It is these that underlie the power of religion and make it an important
ally of the state; that transform classes into status groups, and do the
same to territorial communities under particular circumstances
(ethnicity); and that make "legitimacy" a crucial focus for efforts at
domination.
Weber's conclusions on conflict theory are similar to those reached by
thinkers such as Emile Durkheim, Sigmund Freud, and Nietzsche,
namely that beyond emotionality, some particular forms of social
interaction create strongly held beliefs and solidarity among members of
groups.
Feminist conflict theory

Conflict theory has been used by feminists to explain the position of

women in society. Feminist conflict theorists argue that women have
traditionally been oppressed so that men can benefit from positions of
power, wealth, and status. These theorists would argue that the conflict
over limited natural resources is what led men to relegate women to
domesticity. This interpretation of conflict theory also leads to the idea
that men cannot be trusted to give power to women because this gift
would conflict with their inherent nature.
Conflict theory applied to society
Conflict theory offers a useful lens with which to analyze society. One
might use this theory to explain the enmity between rich and poor within
any society. This enmity could be expressed emotionally, verbally, or
physically. Applying the theory to notable class conflicts is possible.
Events such as the "Battle in Seattle" over global trade or the French
Revolution serve as two examples.
Conflict theory can also be used to explain non-economic conflicts
within a society. One might look at the divide between Protestants and
Catholics as a battle over spiritual resources. On a less macro level, the
competition between students in a classroom serves as a useful example
as well. In such ways, conflict theory is usefully ambiguous in its
application to innumerable phenomena.