ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Oversights in the physical examination are a type of medical error not easily studied by chart
review. They may be a major contributor to missed or delayed diagnosis, unnecessary exposure to contrast and
radiation, incorrect treatment, and other adverse consequences. Our purpose was to collect vignettes of
physical examination oversights and to capture the diversity of their characteristics and consequences.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study using an 11-question qualitative survey for physicians was distributed electronically, with data collected from February to June of 2011. The participants were all physicians responding to e-mail or
social media invitations to complete the survey. There were no limitations on geography, specialty, or practice setting.
RESULTS: Of the 208 reported vignettes that met inclusion criteria, the oversight was caused by a failure to
perform the physical examination in 63%; 14% reported that the correct physical examination sign was
elicited but misinterpreted, whereas 11% reported that the relevant sign was missed or not sought.
Consequence of the physical examination inadequacy included missed or delayed diagnosis in 76%
of cases, incorrect diagnosis in 27%, unnecessary treatment in 18%, no or delayed treatment in 42%,
unnecessary diagnostic cost in 25%, unnecessary exposure to radiation or contrast in 17%, and complications caused by treatments in 4%. The mode of the number of physicians missing the nding was 2, but
many oversights were missed by many physicians. Most oversights took up to 5 days to identify, but 66
took longer. Special attention and skill in examining the skin and its appendages, as well as the abdomen,
groin, and genitourinary area could reduce the reported oversights by half.
CONCLUSIONS: Physical examination inadequacies are a preventable source of medical error, and adverse
events are caused mostly by failure to perform the relevant examination.
2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. The American Journal of Medicine (2015) 128, 1322-1324
KEYWORDS: Attending rounds; Bedside; Bedside teaching; Diagnostic error; Electronic medical record; EMR; Error;
Medical error; Medical mistakes; Mistakes; Oversights; Patient examination; Physical diagnosis;
Physical examination; Resident; Teaching
SEE RELATED ARTICLE p. 1263
Funding: None.
Conict of Interest: None.
Authorship: All authors had access to the data and a role in writing the
manuscript.
Requests for reprints should be addressed to Abraham Verghese, MD,
Stanford University, Department of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, S102,
Stanford, CA 94305-5110.
E-mail address: abrahamv@stanford.edu
0002-9343/$ -see front matter 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.06.004
Verghese et al
1323
RESULTS
Of the 263 responses received, 55 were excluded; of the 208
remaining responses, 27 were corrected by the criteria
described in Methods.
Sixty-three percent of vignettes reported that the oversight was caused by a failure to perform the physical
examination; 14% reported that the correct physical examination sign was elicited but misinterpreted. Eleven percent
1324
DISCUSSION
Recent publications describe the decline of physical examination skills.7-12 Our study highlights the consequences and
suggests that many adverse events are preventable. Our
survey suggests that the major cause for error is simply that
the examination is not performed.12,13 In addition to diagnostic consequences, approximately half of the vignettes
report treatment consequences. Most oversights pertained to
a limited number of overlookers, suggesting that some errors may be remedied if several people examine the patient.
Although the majority of the errors were corrected within 5
days, even a delay of 1 hour might affect patient outcomes.
Examining a patient presenting with a complaint (as
opposed to the routine physical) is a low-cost procedure
that, when done with skill, can avoid the majority of oversights listed. Many diseases involving the skin or the
nervous system cannot easily be diagnosed except by the
examination, and for others the appropriate diagnostic test is
indicated by the examination. The drop-down boxes of the
electronic medical record deceptively suggest every patient
has been thoroughly examined (and therefore can be billed),
but it will be the responsibility of educators and professional
organizations to make sure the electronic medical record
truthfully reects what was done.
A short checklist is suggested by our study: physicians
should seek full exposure of the patient; there must be a
mandate to examine hernial orices and the genital
and rectal areas in acutely ill patients or with pain. Pain
should prompt a search for the lesions of shingles. Nonneurologists need a sound neurologic skill set because imaging does not show the functional decits resulting from a
lesion seen. For diseases like Wernickes encephalopathy or
Bells palsy, imaging may not be diagnostic. Finally, there
should be a greater emphasis on actually performing the
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors thank Ralph Horwitz, MD, for his encouragement
of the First Stanford Symposium on Bedside Medicine in
2009, and for his helpful discussions in planning this study.
References
1. Kohn KT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To Err Is Human: Building a
Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
2. Kassirer JP, Kopelman RI. Cognitive errors in diagnosis: instantiation,
classication, and consequences. Am J Med. 1989;86(4):433-441.
3. Graber ML, Franklin N, Gordon R. Diagnostic error in internal
medicine. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(13):1493-1499.
4. Singh H, Graber ML, Kissam SM, et al. System-related interventions
to reduce diagnostic errors: a narrative review. BMJ Qual Saf.
2012;21(2):160-170.
5. OLeary KJ, Liebovitz DM, Baker DW. How hospitalists spend their
time: insights on efciency and safety. J Hosp Med. 2006;1(2):88-93.
6. Block L, Habicht R, Wu AW, et al. In the wake of the 2003 and 2011
duty hour regulations, how do internal medicine interns spend their
time? J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(8):1042-1047.
7. Feddock CA. The lost art of clinical skills. Am J Med. 2007;120(4):
374-378.
8. Rahmani S, Ring BN, Lowe R, et al. A pilot study assessing knowledge
of clinical signs and physical examination skills in incoming medicine
residents. J Grad Med Educ. 2010;2(2):232-235.
9. Willett LL, Estrada CA, Castiglioni A. Does residency training
improve performance of physical examination skills? Am J Med Sci.
2007;333(2):74-77.
10. Sharma S. A single-blinded, direct observational study of PGY-1 interns and PGY-2 residents in evaluating their history-taking and
physical-examination skills. Perm J. 2011;15(4):23-29.
11. Jauhar S. The demise of the physical examination. N Engl J Med.
2006;354(6):548-551.
12. Ortiz-Neu C, Walters CA, Tenenbaum J, Colliver JA, Schmidt HJ.
Error patterns of 3rd-year medical students on the cardiovascular
physical examination. Teach Learn Med. 2001;13(3):161-166.
13. Bordage G. Why did I miss the diagnosis? Some cognitive explanations
and educational implications. Acad Med. 1999;74(10 suppl):S138-S143.
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Supplementary table accompanying this article can be found
in the online version at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.
2015.06.004.
Verghese et al
1324.e1
Supplementary Table 1
Continued
1324.e2
Supplementary Table 1
Supplementary Table 1
Continued
Verghese et al
Supplementary Table 1
Continued
1324.e3