Anda di halaman 1dari 100

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\1

Project Training

MS Training
July 2001

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\3

Project Training

Table of Contents

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

Section 1

Overview

Section 2

Morgan Stanley Financial Definitions

Section 3

Market-Based Valuation

Tab A

Comparable Companies Analysis

Tab B

Precedent Transactions Analysis

Section 4

Intrinsic Valuation

Tab C

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

Section 5

Merger Accounting/Analysis

Tab E

Accounting Issues

Tab F

Contribution Analysis

Tab G

Mini-Merger Analysis

Tab H

Value Creation Analysis

Tab I

Potential Impact of New Accounting Rules

Tab J

Overview of Former Accounting Practices

Section 6

Restructuring

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\4

Project Training

Table of Contents (cont'd)

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

Section 7

Equity Capital Market Services

Section 8

Fixed Income Capital Markets (FICM)

Section 9

Case Studies

Tab K

Ziff-Davis

Tab L

UPS

Tab M

APA Merger

Tab N

Real Estate

Tab O

American General

Tab P

AOL Time Warner

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\5

Project Training

Section 1

Overview

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\6

Project Training

Overview

Valuation Overview
Morgan Stanley uses four
primary valuation techniques
to establish the value range
for a company

Comparable
Company
Trading
Analysis

Precedent
Transaction
Analysis
Company Value

Leveraged
Buyout Analysis

Discounted
Cash Flow
Analysis

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\7

Project Training

Overview

Summary of Valuation Techniques


There is no single correct
valuation technique.
However, each approach has
strengths and weaknesses
and should be used in the
context of each specific
situation

Valuation Method
Comparable Company
Trading Analysis

Generally several valuation


techniques are used to
determine a value range

Description

Comments

Provides Companys implied value in the public


equity markets through analysis of comparable
companies trading and operating statistics

Reliability depends on the level of comparability of


other publicly traded companies
industry

Does not include control premium

range of products

Fully distributed trading value

revenue base (size)

Apply multiples derived from similar or comparable


publicly traded companies to companys operating
statistics

geographical presence
profitability
growth
A change of control premium may be applied to
estimate private market value

Precedent Transactions
Analysis

Provides private market benchmark in a change of


control scenario
Does include control premium

Reliability depends on number of recent precedent


transactions and their degree of comparability, as
well as the relative supply and demand for a certain
type of asset at the time of the transaction

Apply multiples derived from similar or comparable


Market cycles and volatility may also affect
precedent M&A transactions to Companys
valuation
operating data
Discounted Cash Flow
Analysis

Theoretical valuation

Leveraged Buyout Analysis

Determine the range of prices that a financial buyer


would be willing to pay for an asset assuming a
range of target rates of return

This analysis is heavily dependent on the cash flow


profile of the asset exit value assumption

Other

Check if there are any other sources of value in a


particular transaction

Different valuation techniques might apply

Project the Companys future operating cash flows


for five years or more and calculate the present
value of those cash flows and of the terminal value
using an appropriate cost of capital and terminal
value methodology

This analysis is heavily dependent on cash flow and


growth characteristics of the company, and the
terminal value assumption

Net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs)


Synergies
Off balance sheet items
Break-up value

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\8

Project Training

Overview

Applications of Valuation Techniques


Valuation analysis is central to the advice Morgan Stanley gives its clients and is used broadly
throughout the firm
Applications of valuation analysis include:
Acquisitions
How much would one be willing to pay to buy the company?
Divestitures
How much can the company/division be sold for?
Fairness Opinion
Is the price offered for the company/division fair from a financial point of view?
Public Equity Offerings
How much value can be obtained in the public market for the company/division?
Restructurings
What is the value that can be generated through a restructuring of the company?
New Business Presentations
Various applications

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\9

Project Training

Section 2

Morgan Stanley Financial Definitions

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\10

Project Training

Morgan Stanley Financial Definitions

The Basic Equations

AV

= EV + Net D or EV = AV - D

EV

= NI x P/E

NI

= (EBIT - Int. Exp.) (1 - t)

Int. Exp

=Dxr

= L% * AV

Definitions:

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

AV

= Asset value

EV

= Equity value (market)

= Debt (net)

P/E

= Price to earnings ratio (= price per share/earnings per share)

NI

= Net income

EBIT

= Earnings before interest and taxes

= tax rate

= interest rate

L%

= D/(D + EV), or leverage

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\11

Project Training

Morgan Stanley Financial Definitions

Dynamic Model Overview


Relationships Between Key Financial Statements

Balance Sheet

Income Statement
Sales (driver: growth)
- Cost of Goods Sold

Cash
+

Inventory

Accounts Receivable

- Operating Expenses (driver: margin, inflation)

PP&E

+ Synergies (if any)

Total Assets

Accounts Payable

Debt

Shareholders Equity

= Gross Profit (driver: margin)

= EBIT
- Interest
= EBT
- Tax

Cash Flow Statement

Change in Inventory (driver: turns/sales)

Net Income

Change in Accounts Receivable (driver: days/sales)

+ Depreciation (1)

Change in Accounts Payable (driver: days/COGS)

= Operating Cash Flow

- Investment in WC
- Capital Expenditures
= Free Cash Flow
+/-Change in Debt
- Dividend Payments

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity


Working Capital Schedule

= Net Income

Investment in WC
Debt and Cash Schedule
Beginning Cash Balance
Beginning Debt Balance

+/- Change in Cash


+/- Debt paydown/increase

+/-Change in Equity

Ending Debt Balance (calculate interest expense on average)

= Change in Cash

Ending Cash Balance (calculate interest income on average)

Note
1. Depreciation of factory-related items can be found in Cost of Goods Sold. Depreciation on everything else (headquarters, copiers in corporate offices, etc.)
can be found in SG&A

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\12

Project Training

Morgan Stanley Financial Definitions

Mechanics of Dynamic Model

Income Statement

Financial Statement

Comments

Sales

Sales are driven by sales growth assumptions

% Sales Growth

Formula: Sales = Last Year Sales x (1 + Current Year Sales Growth)


Sales Growth = Input on Assumption Page

Cost of Goods Sold (COGS)

COGS are driven by margin assumption

% COGS Margin

Formula: COGS = Sales x COGS Margin


COGS Margin = Input on Assumption Page

Gross Profit

Formula:

% Margin
Operating Expenses

Operating Expenses are driven by % of sales assumptions

% of Sales

Formula: Operating Expenses = Sales x % of Sales


% of Sales = Input on Assumption Page

EBITDA

Formula:

% Margin
EBIT
% Margin
Net Interest Expense
EBT
% Margin

EBITDA = EBIT + Depreciation

Margin = EBIT / Sales


Formula:

EBIT = Gross Profit - Operating Expenses

Margin = EBIT / Sales


Interest Expense is driven by interest rate assumptions
Formula:

Interest Expense = Average Debt x Interest Rate

Formula:

EBT = EBIT - Net Interest Expense

Margin = EBT / Sales

Taxes

Taxes are driven by assumed tax rate

% Tax Rate

Formula: Taxes = EBT x Tax Rate


Tax Rate = Input on Assumption Page

Net Income

Formula:

% Margin
Cash Flow Statement

Gross Profit = Sales COGS

Margin = Gross Profit / Sales

Net Income = EBT - Taxes

Margin = Net Income / Sales

Net Income

Read from Income Statement

Depreciation

Calculated based on % of PP&E

% of PP&E

Formula: Depreciation = PP&E at beginning of year x % of PP&E


% of PP&E = Input on Assumption Page

Other Non-Cash Items

Keep constant from historical results or make specific assumptions as needed

Investment in Working Capital

Read from change in working capital provided by working capital schedule

% of Change in Sales

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\13

Project Training

Morgan Stanley Financial Definitions

Mechanics of Dynamic Model (contd)

Cash Flow Statement (contd)

Financial Statement

Comments

Operating Cash Flow

Formula:

% of Sales

Selected Balance Sheet Items

Operating Cash Flow = Net Income + Depreciation + Other Non Cash Items

% of Sales = Operating Cash Flow / Sales

Capital Expenditure

Calculate based on % of average PP&E or on % of Depreciation or on % of Sales

% of PP&E

Formula: Capital Expenditures = Average PP&E x % of [PP&E]


% of [PP&E] = Input on Assumption Page

Levered Free Cash Flow

Formula:

Levered Free Cash Flow = Operating Cash Flow Investment in Working Capital - Capital Expenditure

After Tax Interest Expense

Formula:

After Tax Interest Expense = Net Interest Expense x (1 - Tax Rate)

Unlevered Free Cash Flow

Formula:

Unlevered Free Cash Flow = Levered Free Cash Flow + After Tax Interest Expense

Working Capital Schedule


Accounts Receivable

Calculated based on days receivable

Days Receivable

Formula:

Accounts Receivable = Sales x (Days Receivable / 365)

Days Receivable = Input on Assumption Page


Inventory

Calculated based on inventory turnover

Inventory Turnover

Formula: Inventory = COGS / Inventory Turnover


Inventory Turnover = Input on Assumption Page

Other Current Assets

Calculated based on % of Sales

% of Sales

Formula: Other Current Assets = Sales x % of Sales


% of Sales = Input on Assumption Page

Accounts Payable

Calculated based on days payable

Days Payable

Formula: Accounts Payable = COGS x (Days Payable / 365)


Days Payable = Input on Assumption Page

Other Current Liabilities

Calculated based on % of Sales

% of Sales

Formula: Other Current Liabilities = Sales x % of Sales


% of Sales = Input on Assumption Page

Net Working Capital

Formula:
Liabilities

% of Sales
Change in Net Working Capital
% of Change in Sales

Net Working Capital = Accounts Receivable + Inventory + Other Current Assets Accounts Payable - Other Current

% of Sales = Net Working Capital / Sales


Formula:

Change in Net Working Capital = Current year Net Working Capital - Last Year Net Working Capital

% of Change in Sales = Change in Net Working Capital / Change in Sales

PP&E Schedule
PP&E

Start with latest Balance Sheet entry (see 10Q/10K)


Formula:

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

PP&E = Last Year PP&E + Capital Expenditures - Depreciation

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\14

Project Training

Morgan Stanley Financial Definitions

Morgan Stanley Definitions

Financial Term

Definition

Income Statement
Sales (Revenues)

In general, revenue is recognized, not as goods are produced nor as orders are received, but only when the sale (delivery) has been consummated and cash or a
receivable is obtained. In certain circumstances other recognition methods may be used (e.g., percentage-of-completion method, installment method)

Cost of Goods Sold (Cost of Sales)

Inventoriable costs that firms expense because they sold the units; equals beginning finished goods inventory plus cost of goods purchased or manufactured minus
ending finished goods inventory

Gross Profit

Sales minus Cost of Goods Sold

Operating Expenses

Expenses incurred in the course of ordinary activities of an entity excluding Cost of Goods Sold, Interest and Income Tax Expenses. In general Operating Expense
include items such as Labor, Energy, Selling, General & Administrative, Depreciation & Amortization

Earnings Before Interest, Income Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)

EBIT plus Depreciation & Amortization; adjust for Extraordinary Items such as Restructuring Charges

Earnings Before Interest and Income Taxes (EBIT)

Gross Profit minus Operating Expenses; adjust for Extraordinary Items such as Restructuring Charges

Interest

The charge or cost of using money, usually borrowed funds: For calculation, Morgan Stanley applies the interest rate to the average amount of debt outstanding

Nominal Interest Rate: a rate specified on a debt instrument, which usually differs from the market or effective rate. Also, a rate of interest quoted for a year (If the
interest is compounded more often than annually, then the effective interest rate is higher than the nominal rate)

Effective Interest Rate: for bond, the internal rate of return or yield to maturity at the time of issue (contrast with coupon rate) (e.g., if the bond is issued for a price
below par, the effective rate is higher than the coupon rate). In the context of compound interest, the effective interest is the single rate that one could use at the
end of the year to multiply the principal at the beginning of the year and give the same amount as results from compounding interest each period during the year

Coupon Rate: for bond, the amount of annual coupons divided by par value (contrast with effective rate)

Gross Interest Expense: interest incurred before subtracting Interest Income

Net Interest Expense: Gross Interest Expense minus Interest Income

Earnings Before Taxes (EBT)

Difference between all revenues and expenses except income tax expense

Income Tax

Annual tax levied by the federal and other governments on the income of an entity

Effective Tax Rate: Income Tax Expense divided by EBT; average rate paid for certain period

Marginal Tax Rate: Tax rate paid on the incremental dollar of income

Minority Interest

The minoritys interest in current periods income of a subsidiary between 50% and 100%; must be subtracted to arrive at consolidated net income for the period

Net Income (available to common shareholder)

Net Income before Extraordinary Items and after Minority Interest and Preferred Dividends

Earnings per Share (EPS)

See below for more detail

Writing off the cost of an asset (the accounting process of reducing an amount by periodic payments or write-downs)

Cash Flow Statement


Depreciation

Depreciable Life: the time period or units of activity (such as miles driven for a truck) over which depreciable cost is to be allocated. Far tax purposes, depreciable
life may be different than for accounting purposes

Amortization

Depreciation of intangible assets (e.g., Goodwill)

Depletion

Depreciation of wasting assets (natural resources)

Deferred Taxes

Timing difference in Taxes based on different accounting principles in tax returns from those used in financial reports

Operating Cash Flow

Sum of Net Income available to common shareholders, Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization, Deferred Taxes and other non-cash expenses less any non-cash
revenues

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\15

Project Training

Morgan Stanley Financial Definitions

Morgan Stanley Definitions (contd)

Financial Term

Definition

Investments in Working Capital

Net Change in Working Capital accounts over accounting period (see Working Capital definitions)

Capital Expenditures

Expenditures to acquire long-term assets

Levered Free Cash Flow

Operating Cash Flow less Capital Expenditures and less Investments in Working Capital

Unlevered Free Cash Flow

Levered Free Cash Flow plus after tax Net Interest Expense

Cash Flow per Share

Operating Cash Flow divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding

Working Capital
Accounts Receivable (Receivables)

Collectibles due within one year

Receivable Days Outstanding: 365 multiplied by average Accounts receivable divided by Sales

Inventory

Other Current Assets

Other assets the firm expects to turn into cash, sell, or exchange within one year

Accounts Payable (Payables)

Amounts due to suppliers within one year

Other Current Liabilities

Obligations that a firm must discharge within one year

Net Working Capital

Current Assets (incl. Accounts receivables, Inventory, Other Current Assets) minus Current Liabilities (incl. Accounts Payable, Other Current Liabilities)

Balance Sheet

Statement of financial position at one point in time: Shows Total Assets = Total Liabilities + Shareholders Equity

Cash

Currency and coins, negotiable checks and balances in bank accounts

Marketable Securities

Stocks and bonds of other companies held that can be readily sold on stock exchanges and that the company plans to sell as cash is needed. The same securities
held for long-term purposes would be classified as Noncurrent Assets. Accounting rules require lower-of-cost-or-market valuation for all marketable equities but
different accounting treatments depending upon whether the security is a current or a noncurrent asset

Accounts Receivable

See Working Capital definitions

Inventory

See Working Capital definitions

Other Current Assets

See Working Capital definitions

Property, Plant and Equipment (Fixed Assets)

Assets used in Revenue production process, including buildings, machinery, equipment, land, and natural resources

Intangible Assets

A nonphysical, noncurrent right that gives a firm an exclusive or preferred position in the market place. Examples are copyright, patent, trademark, goodwill,
organization costs, capitalized advertising costs, computer programs, licenses, leases, franchises, mailing lists, exploration permits

Goodwill

The excess of cost of an acquired firm (or operating unit) over the current fair market value of the net assets of the acquired unit

Total Assets

Sum of all Assets appearing on Balance Sheet

Accounts Payable

See Working Capital definitions

Other Current Liabilities

See Working Capital definitions

Short-Term Debt

Notes payable, current portion of Long-Term Debt and bank borrowings; Payable within one year

Raw materials, supplies, work in process, and finished goods

Inventory Turnover: Cost of Goods Sold divided by average Inventories

Payable Days Outstanding: 365 multiplied by average accounts payable divided by cost of goods sold

Balance Sheet

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\16

Project Training

Morgan Stanley Financial Definitions

Morgan Stanley Definitions (contd)

Financial Term

Definition

All senior, subordinated, convertible, mortgage and bank Long-Term Debt (leases capitalized under FASB #13 are included in Long-Term Debt); payable after more
than one year

Capitalized Leases

The present value of Capital or Finance Leases that should be or are on the balance sheet under FASB #13

Operating Leases

Estimated by: Gross Rent expenses multiplied by eight

Pension Liabilities (Unfunded)

The difference between the present value of all vested benefits owed in the future and the value of the pension assets

Preferred Stock

Capital stock with a claim to income or assets after bondholders but before common shareholders

Minority Interest

Equity in less-than-100-percent-owned subsidiary companies allocable to those who are not part of the controlling interest

Shareholders Equity (Book Value of Equity)

Sum of Common Stock, Capital Surplus and Retained Earnings less Treasury Stock

Book value per Share

Shareholders Equity divided by common shares outstanding

Total Debt

Sum of Short-Term Debt plus Long-Term Debt plus Minority Interest plus Preferred Stock

Net Debt

Total Debt less Cash and Cash Equivalents (i.e., Marketable Securities)

Book Capitalization

Sum of Long-Term Debt plus Minority Interest plus Preferred Stock and Shareholders Equity

Adjusted Book Capitalization

Book Capitalization plus Short-Term Debt

Total Capital

Sum of Short-Term Debt, Long-Term Debt, Minority Interest, Preferred Stock and Shareholders Equity

Price per Share

Current Market Price (for presentations use the closing price of defined date)

Unaffected Price Per Share

Most recent closing share price prior to specific announcement (i.e., announcement of strategic activity, earnings); for PPAIDS, unaffected price is normally assumed
to be 30 days prior to the transaction announcement

Market Value (Equity Value)

Common Stock outstanding multiplied by the Current Market Price Per Share

Market Capitalization

Market Value plus Long-Term Debt plus Minority Interest plus Preferred Stock (should not be used)

Adjusted Market Capitalization

Market Capitalization plus Short-Term Debt (should not be used)

Aggregate Value

Adjusted Market Capitalization less Cash and Cash Equivalents

Long-Term Debt

Market Valuation

Ratios and Statistics


Operating Statistics

Financial Leverage Ratios

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

EBITDA Margin (EBITDA/Sales)

EBIT Margin (EBIT/Sales)

Net Income Margin (Net Income/Sales)

EPS Growth (Next five years EPS CAGR, get from FactSet)

(Long-Term Debt plus Minority Interest plus Preferred Stock)/Book Capitalization

Total Debt/Adj. Book Capitalization

The above ratios can also include capitalized leases and off-balance sheet items

10

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\17

Project Training

Morgan Stanley Financial Definitions

Morgan Stanley Definitions (contd)

Financial Term
Debt Service Ratios

Interest Coverage Ratios

Return Statistics

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

Definition

Operating Cash Flow/Long-Term Debt

Operating Cash Flow/Total Debt

Free Operating Cash Flow/Total Debt

Total Debt/EBITDA

Total Debt/EBITDA (including Rents)

EBITDA/Gross Interest Expense

EBIT/Gross Interest Expense

Operating Cash Flow/Gross Interest Expense

Free Operating Cash Flow/Gross Interest Expense

Pre-Tax Return on Capital (EBIT divided by average Total Capital)

After-Tax Return on Capital (Net Income divided by average Total Capital)

Return on Equity (Net Income divided by average Shareholders Equity)

Pre-Tax Return on Assets (EBIT divided by average Total Assets)

11

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\18

Project Training

Morgan Stanley Financial Definitions

Summary of Basic and Diluted EPS Calculations


Summary of Basic and Diluted EPS Calculations

Basic Earnings Per Share


Weighted Average Basic Shares Outstanding
Net Income
to Common
Shareholder

Includes only shares outstanding during


relevant period
Does not include any potentially dilutive
securities

Diluted Earnings Per Share


Diluted Net Income
Net income to common shareholders + after tax
interest expense or preferred dividends related
to dilutive convertible securities, if any

Shares from Convertible Securities (if


Converted)

Weighted
Average
Basic Shares
Outstanding

Includes shares from the conversion of


convertible securities only if they will be dilutive
to EPS upon conversion, i.e., the dilutive impact
of underlying shares exceeds the effect of the
addback of asociated interest expense

Options and Warrants (Treasury Stock


Method)

Treasury Stock Method

Includes shares from all outstanding warrants


and options only if they will be dilutive to EPS
upon exercise, i.e., the average market price for
the relevant period exceeds the exercise price
Increase the number of the basic shares
according to the treasury stock method

The treasury method assumes that the proceeds form the


exercise of warrants and options are used to repurchase
shares at the average market price for the relevant period
Treasury shares are calculated as follows: (Average
Market Price for Period - Exercise Price) X Warrant &
Option Shares Average Market Price for Period

Diluted shares outstanding differ in accounting and acquisition context


Weighted Average Shares Outstanding used to
calculate Basic Earnings per share and Diluted
Earnings per share are accounting concepts that
allow for the allocation of net income to a
hypothetical number of shares outstanding over a
given period of time

However, in the context of an acquisition, an acquiror


is concerned with the purchase of all of the targets
equity securities (including those that represent
underlying equity e.g., options, warrants,
convertibles) outstanding at the time of the
acquisition

Used to facilitate comparisons between different


companies and calculation of relationship between
earnings and stock price

Stated differently, if an acquiror seeks to purchase


100% control of a target, consideration must be
given to all securities with potential equity rights

Specific rules regarding the inclusion/exclusion of


potentially dilutive securities

Therefore, for acquisition analysis, it is necessary


to assume that all outstanding instruments with
underlying in-the-money equity value are
converted

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

For acquisition analysis, fully diluted number of


shares outstanding is calculated based on the latest
publicly disclosed number of common shares
outstanding (stated on front of latest 10-Q or 10-K for
U.S. companies) and the latest available information
regarding outstanding warrants, options and
convertible securities (generally found in financial
statements in latest 10-K)
In making adjustments to number of shares
outstanding, be certain to (i) include proceeds from
the assumed exercise of any options or warrants
and (ii) adjust the income statement to exclude
after-tax amount of interest expense or preferred
dividends associated with convertible securities

12

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\19

Project Training

Section 3

Market-Based Valuation

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\20

Project Training

Tab A

Comparable Companies Analysis

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\21

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Comparable Company Analysis


Overview

Uses

Public market valuation of publicly traded company (e.g., is the company undervalued? Why?)
Establish public market valuation benchmarks for private company
Analysis of the break-up value of a conglomerate by establishing public market valuation
benchmarks for each business segment
Allows benchmarking of operating performance
Yields fully-distributed equity value of the company/division

Advantages

Disadvantages

Based on public information

Difficult to find large sample of truly comparable companies;


it is difficult/impossible to adjust for differences in the
underlying business of comparable companies
Despite market efficiency arguments, sometimes difficult
to explain different valuations and trading levels for
apparently similar companies
Trading valuation of a company may be affected by thin
trading activities, small capitalization, poor research coverage,
and small public float
Argument that the market can be wrong
Stock prices may be impacted by outside variables such as
M&A activity in the sector, regulatory scrutiny, etc.

Market efficiency implies that, in theory, trading valuation


should reflect all available information including trends,
business risk, growth characteristics, etc.
Values obtained can be reliable indicator of the value of the
company for a minority investment (i.e., does not include
control premium)

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

13

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\22

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Comparable Company Analysis


Purpose

Compare all publicly traded companies in one industry according to:


Trading value
Financial performance
Credit profile
Identify relative value among:
Publicly traded companies
Operating units of a large corporation
Indicate credit profile to:
Determine credit rating
Determine appropriate capital structure

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

14

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\23

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

What Are You Analyzing?


How should this company be valued?
Different industries trade on different multiples
Multiples are consistent within an industry
Relevant multiple range
Relative value of the company compared to relevant industry multiple range
How does the companys operating and financial profile compare up to its peers?
Industry-specific trends
Growth prospects
Operating margins
Capital structure
Questions to ask yourself:
What companies should I compare this company or operating unit to?
What multiples should I be looking at?
Does this company trade at a discount or premium to its peers? If so, why?
How efficient is the companys operating model relative to its peers?
What kind of credit rating should this company receive?
How does this companys capital structure compare to those of its peers?
MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

15

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\24

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Selecting Comparable Companies


Step 1: Identify Comparable Companies

Step 2: Identify Valuation Benchmarks

Step 3: Gather Data

Business characteristics

Financial benchmarks

Industry group

Products

Determined by industry

Product Mix

Determined by growth phase

Geographical markets
Customers
Financial characteristics
Size (revenues, operating income)

Industry-specific benchmarks

Research reports

Key statistics for industry

10K: Competition section

e.g., Internet: Agg. Val/Users

Bloomberg

Calculate mean and median values

Profitability (operating margins)

Median values are standard

Leverage

Mean values are included but are often


skewed due to outliers

Rank according to relevance

FACTSET/SIC run

Equity research

Tier I: Pure-play
Tier II: Relevant

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

16

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\25

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Output
Trading

Operating

Credit

Compare multiples based on companies


trading values

Analyze companies past and projected


financial performance

Determine credit profile and implied


credit rating

Uses:

Identify correlation between trading and


operating statistics

Indicates optimal capital structure

Valuation range
Identify undervalued companies
Identify key industry players
Identify acquisition targets
Key Features:
Equivalent fiscal year-end mean and
median calculations

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

e.g., high growth rates equate to


high trading multiples

Appropriate amount of leverage


Typical Ratios:

Relative measure of companies


operating efficiency

Debt/Book Capitalization

Uses:

Debt/EBITDA

Debt/Market Capitalization

Identify companys competitiveness

EBIT/Interest

Identify industry trends

EBITDA/Interest

Identify cyclicality

Cash Flow/Total Debt

Identify areas for improvement

Cash Flow Cap Ex/Total Debt

17

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\26

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Equity vs. Aggregate Value


Equity Value

Aggregate Value

Shares outstanding x Current stock price

Equity Value + Net Debt

Market value of a companys equity


Represents flows available to holders of
equity after debt and preferred claims have
been serviced
Typical equity value multiples:
Equity value/Net Income (P/E)
Equity value/After-tax Cash Flow
Equity value/Book Value of Equity

Net Debt = Short-term Debt + Long-term


Debt + Minority Interest + Preferred
Stock + Capitalized Leases - Cash and
Cash Equivalents
Represents value available to service
claims of all investors, including holders of
both debt and equity securities
Typical aggregate value multiples:
Aggregate Value/Revenue
Aggregate Value/EBITDA
Aggregate Value/EBIT
Aggregate Value/Free Cash Flow
Other terms for Aggregate Value:
Asset Value
Total Value
Firm Value
Enterprise Value

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

18

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\27

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Calendarization
EPS calendarization always want to look at forward looking statistics, like EPS estimates, on
apples to apples basis
If one companys year-end is January 31 and anothers is September 30, we need to adjust EPS
estimates to include the same earning periods
I/B/E/S EPS estimates for CoA: $1.60 for the first year, $1.90 for the second, for the years
ending 11/30 we want to look at them on 12/31 basis
If the year-end for analysis purposes is 12/31, 11 months will have passed during year in
which the earnings estimate was $1.60, so take 11/12 of that number
Only one month remains in year which earnings estimate is $1.90, so take 1/12 of that number
Result is a weighted average of $1.63 for the year ending 11/30

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

19

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\28

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Latest Twelve Months (LTM) Calculation


Assumptions

LTM Sales

Fiscal Year End

9/30/00

Quarter End

6/30/01

Sales (Annual) ($)

$200 + $170 - $120 = $250

(1)

200

Sales (9 Months Ended 6/30/01)

170

Sales (9 Months Ended 6/30/00)

120

Graph Heading
Y Axis9/30/99
Label Heading

6/30/00

9/30/00

6/30/01

Last Twelve Months

$200

$120

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

Note
1. For the year ended 9/30/99

$170

20

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\29

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

EPS Calendarization Calculation


Assumptions

12/31/00 Calendarized EPS

Last Fiscal Year End

11/30/00

Calendarization Date

12/31/00

EPS Year Ended 11/30/00 ($)

1.60

EPS Year Ended 11/30/01 ($)

1.90

11

/12 ($1.60) + /12 ($1.90) = $1.63

Graph Heading
Y Axis11/99
Label Heading
12/99
11 Months

$1.60

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

11/00

12/00

11/01

1 Month

$1.90

21

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\30

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

EPS Calendarization Calculation


Continued

Assumptions

1/31/01 Calendarized EPS

Last Fiscal Year End

11/30/00

Calendarization Date

1/31/01

EPS Year Ended 11/30/00 ($)

1.60

EPS Year Ended 11/30/01 ($)

1.90

10

/12 ($1.60) + /12 ($1.90) = $1.65

Graph Heading
Y Axis11/99
Label Heading
1/00
10 Months

$1.60

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

11/00

1/01

11/01

2 Months

$1.90

22

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\31

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Asset Value vs. Equity Value


Concept

Return on the Companys Assets

Use Asset Value


Multiple

Available to all
providers of capital
Sales
EBITDA
EBIT

Use Equity Value


Multiple

Available to equity
providers only
EBT
Net Income
Free Cash Flow

Financing of the Companys Assets

Debt

Equity

Company Data
Example

CoB(2)
$

Sales

6,298

6,298

EBIT

1,024

1,024

Implied Valuation Multiples

128

Aggregate Value/Sales (x)

1,024

896

Aggregate Value/EBIT (x)

Tax (36%)

369

323

Equity Value/Net Income (x)

Net Income

655

573

Return on Equity (%)

Asset Value

9,300

9,300

1,903

9,300

7,397

Interest
EBT

Net Debt
Market Value of Equity

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

Valuation Analysis

CoA(1)
$

Notes
1. Unlevered (no debt)
2. Levered (with debt)

Example

CoA(1)

CoB(2)

Asset Value ($)

9,300

9,300

Equity Value ($)

9,300

7,397

1.5

1.5

9.1

9.1

14.2

12.9

7.0

7.8

23

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\32

Market-Based Valuation

Project Training

Specific Calculations for Comparables Analysis


Adjusting for Non-Recurring Items
Example

Sales
Gross Profit
SG&A

Original Adjustment

100

100

50

50

30

30

10

EBIT

10

(10)

0
20

Interest
Expense

EBIT

15

Taxes (40%)

Net Income

Comments

Example

Sales
LTM Sales
Comments

Restructuring
Charge

Calendarizing

LTM Calculation
Adjusted

Footnotes to financial
statements often provide the
net-of-tax effect of nonrecurring items

12/31/99
10K

100

6/30/99
10Q

6/30/00
10Q

48

54

100 + 54 - 48 = 106
Be careful when
calculating LTM EPS as
the number of shares
might have changed
Use weighted average
shares outstanding
applied to the LTM net
income

EPS
Fiscal
Year End

LFY

FY1

CoA

12/31

3.30

3.68

CoB

1/31

2.15

2.35

Example

Calendarize Company B to 12/31:


1

/12 x 2.15 +

11

/12 x 2.35 = 2.33

Quick Check: Result must lie between LFY


and FY1 EPS
Comments

Always try to
calendarize companies
to acquiror year- end
(unless industry
standard exists)
Be particularly careful
when analyzing highly
cyclical industries
Also applicable to the
Mini Merger Model

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

24

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\33

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Comparable Companies Analysis


Trading Statistics

Comparable Companies
Price/Earnings

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

Revenue

Aggregate Value/
EBIT

EBITDA

5-Yr.
Price/
EPS
Book CAGR
x
%

2002E
P/E to
Growth
x

Compa
ny

Current
Price
$

Market
Val.
$MM

Agg. Val.
$MM

01E
x

02E
x

LTM
x

01E
x

LTM
x

01E
x

LTM
x

01E
x

CoA

40.350

18,324

21,600

18.1

16.1

2.7

3.1

12.0

14.6

10.2

12.3

12.3

12.7

1.3

CoB

22.450

10,785

16,198

16.0

14.4

0.7

0.7

12.2

11.4

9.2

8.6

3.4

13.0

1.1

CoC

38.050

10,988

13,663

17.1

15.2

1.6

1.6

12.1

11.1

9.8

9.1

9.1

11.8

1.3

CoD

55.100

8,683

10,510

16.1

14.6

1.8

1.7

11.5

10.4

9.5

8.7

20.0

9.8

1.5

CoE

42.050

15,377

18,522

16.4

14.8

2.0

1.9

12.2

10.6

9.9

9.0

6.6

10.5

1.4

CoF

51.900

7,429

8,614

21.1

18.9

2.0

1.9

13.3

12.7

10.8

10.3

8.2

12.0

1.6

CoG

27.000

11,048

12,957

18.6

16.9

1.9

1.9

10.7

10.8

8.6

8.7

10.7

10.0

1.7

CoH

28.600

7,561

12,196

23.8

22.0

1.4

1.4

11.4

11.8

7.8

7.9

1.8

12.5

1.8

CoI

47.500

6,475

7,199

21.0

18.9

1.5

1.4

13.0

13.4

10.4

10.2

55.8

11.0

1.7

CoJ

23.250

7,149

9,416

19.3

17.0

2.0

2.0

20.3

12.9

14.4

10.1

4.0

11.8

1.4

CoK

43.750

20,435

24,639

16.3

14.4

1.2

1.2

14.3

13.2

10.5

9.7

8.8

13.8

1.0

Mean

18.5

16.7

1.7

1.7

13.0

12.1

10.1

9.5

12.8

11.7

1.4

Median

18.1

16.1

1.8

1.7

12.2

11.8

9.9

9.1

8.8

11.8

1.4

High

23.8

22.0

2.7

3.1

20.3

14.6

14.4

12.3

55.8

13.8

1.8

Low

16.0

14.4

0.7

0.7

10.7

10.4

7.8

7.9

1.8

9.8

1.0

25

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\34

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Comparable Companies Analysis


Operating Statistics

Comparable Companies
Sales

EBIT

Net Income

EPS

LTM
$MM

Margin
%

LTM
$MM

Margin
%

LTM
$MM

Margin
%

LTM
$

CoA

8,057.0

2,123.0

26.3

1,799.0

22.3

1,076.0

13.4

2.33

CoB

23,754.3

1,762.9

7.4

1,327.6

5.6

631.0

2.7

1.41

CoC

8,372.0

1,388.0

16.6

1,133.0

13.5

523.0

6.2

4.06

CoD

5,923.5

1,106.5

18.7

910.5

15.4

528.3

8.9

3.27

CoE

9,180.0

1,864.7

20.3

1,524.2

16.6

830.9

9.1

2.14

CoF

4,397.8

798.0

18.1

647.4

14.7

342.8

7.8

2.30

CoG

6,784.1

1,501.2

22.1

1,215.0

17.9

715.1

10.5

1.40

CoH

8,791.0

1,568.0

17.8

1,068.0

12.1

422.0

4.8

1.58

CoI

4,892.5

692.1

14.1

552.4

11.3

273.3

5.6

1.97

CoK

19,838.0

2,346.0

11.8

1,728.0

8.7

726.8

3.7

1.45

Company

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

EBITDA

LTM
$MM

Mean

17.1

13.5

7.5

Median

17.8

13.5

7.8

26

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\35

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Comparable Companies Analysis


Credit Statistics

Comparable Companies
Net
Debt/Adj.
Bk. Cap(1)
%

LTD/
Bk. Cap.(2)
%

LTD/
Mkt. Cap.
%

EBIT/
Interest
x

EBITDA/
Interest
x

Cash Flow
as % of
Total Debt
%

EBIT/
Total
Assets
%

Net Inc./
Book Value Credit
% Rating

CoA

68.8

46.0

6.4

10.5

12.3

42.9

25.7

72.5 AA/Aa3

CoB

60.5

47.8

17.8

4.7

6.2

21.6

10.7

23.6 BBB/Baa1

CoC

67.5

68.1

16.7

6.9

8.4

26.8

18.0

49.9 A+/A2

CoD

80.8

79.3

16.0

8.0

9.8

40.6

23.3

122.0 A+/A2

CoE

57.4

55.6

16.0

6.7

8.2

31.4

18.8

35.6 A+/A1

CoF

56.7

53.2

12.2

7.5

9.3

39.7

19.9

37.9 A+/A1

CoG

64.9

57.9

11.4

10.8

13.4

51.0

24.1

CoH

52.5

51.9

37.5

3.3

4.8

19.4

8.9

10.0 BBB/Baa2

CoI

86.2

88.2

11.8

7.7

9.6

42.8

21.4

235.4 BBB+/Baa1

CoK

62.7

56.9

11.3

10.8

14.7

24.5

15.5

36.2 AA-/A1

Mean

64.9

59.6

16.1

7.2

9.1

33.7

17.6

59.3

Median

62.7

55.6

16.0

7.5

9.3

31.4

18.8

37.0

Company

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

Notes
1. Net Debt = short term debt + long term debt + minority interest - cash and cash equivalents.
Adjusted book capitalization = total debt + preferred stock + book equity
2. Book capitalization = long term debt + minority interest + book equity

69.3 AA/Aa1

27

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\36

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Tips, Shortcuts and Pitfalls


Do

Do Not

Call CFD Coverage group to see if the


comps already exist

Forget to convert numbers reported in


foreign currencies to dollars

E-mail BIS to request research ASAP

Forget to calendarize inputs

Use Morgan Stanley standard definitions

Forget to NM (Not Meaningful) any


irrelevant statistics (e.g. negative
multiples)

Back out extraordinary items


Tax effect extraordinary items where
necessary
Footnote all adjustments

Overlook the effect of outliers on mean


and median multiples

Double check the numbers


Always include mean and median values
Use consistent formatting

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

28

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\37

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Comparable Companies Analysis


Summary

Comparable companies analysis is meaningful


It is firmly grounded in market-based valuation - it reflects what the market tells us
Regardless of whether or not the market is correct, it is an important benchmark
It provides a trading range and, after applying a control premium, an acquisition value
It is the most widely used valuation technique in the financial and business communities
for example, financial sponsors rely heavily on comparable companies valuation, both as a
benchmark and to formulate an idea of exit value
When analyzing comparable companies, a number of variables have to be included
Relative operating performance: companies with higher profitability should yield higher
valuations
Impact of capital structure: the degree of leverage impacts earnings levels, the risk of the
business and future growth prospects
Specific situations make normalizing earnings necessary
Highly cyclical industries
Large differences in leverage within set of comparable companies
Always read research analyst commentary on the company which is being valued or analyzed
Also read research analyst commentary on the set of comparable companies to explain trading
levels (e.g., differences in multiples for companies which appear fairly similar)
Comparable companies analysis is also essential for purposes of calculating or at least crosschecking the reasonableness of the Terminal Value derived from DCF valuation
MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

29

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\38

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Comparable Companies Exercise


Selected Media Industry Companies (1)

Company

Share
(2)
Price
(US$)

Equity
Value
($MM)

Price/
Earnings
LTM
2001E
x
x

Agg.
Value
($MM)

Aggregate Value/
2002E
x

Revenue
LTM
2001E
x
x

2002E
x

LTM
x

EBITDA
2001E
x

2002E
x

Consumer Publishers
EMAP

$10.29

$2,594

$4,016

13.7x

11.9x

10.8x

2.7x

2.6x

N/A

13.8x

13.9x

N/A

Thomson

32.91

20,557

24,657

41.7x

35.0x

30.6x

3.9x

3.1x

2.8x

16.0x

12.7x

11.2x

McGraw-Hill

66.77

13,252

14,435

24.7x

22.2x

N/A

3.3x

3.0x

2.8x

14.5x

12.9x

11.9x

Scholastic

40.84

1,409

2,164

15.2x

17.1x

N/A

1.2x

1.1x

N/A

12.0x

9.3x

N/A

Houghton Mifflin

59.87

1,834

2,283

27.2x

23.3x

21.0x

2.3x

2.1x

N/A

15.8x

11.5x

N/A

John Wiley

22.60

1,418

1,551

24.8x

21.0x

17.7x

2.5x

2.3x

2.1x

13.8x

12.8x

N/A

Mean

24.6x

21.8x

20.0x

2.7x

2.4x

2.6x

14.3x

12.2x

11.6x

Median

24.8x

21.6x

19.3x

2.6x

2.4x

2.8x

14.2x

12.8x

11.6x

Cable
Cablevision Systems

$60.70

$11,416

$18,460

NM

NM

NM

5.0x

4.7x

4.3x

24.9x

19.8x

18.7x

Comcast Corporation

39.30

46,413

56,527

NM

NM

NM

6.5x

5.8x

5.1x

22.5x

20.0x

16.6x

Cox Communications

42.85

27,037

27,110

NM

NM

NM

7.6x

6.6x

5.8x

19.3x

17.2x

14.8x

Insight Communications

26.40

1,583

6,191

NM

NM

NM

10.0x

9.4x

8.4x

22.8x

19.0x

17.1x

Mean

NM

NM

NM

7.3x

6.6x

5.9x

22.4x

19.0x

16.8x

Median

NM

NM

NM

7.0x

6.2x

5.4x

22.6x

19.4x

16.9x

Streaming Data
Inktomi

$8.34

$1,115

$981

NM

NM

NM

5.0x

5.9x

4.4x

NM

NM

NM

Real Networks

11.35

2,043

1,594

NM

NM

NM

7.5x

7.5x

5.7x

NM

NM

NM

WebEx

20.77

855

816

NM

NM

NM

32.2x

10.6x

5.4x

NM

NM

45.1x

iBEAM

0.30

38

49

NM

NM

NM

1.8x

1.3x

0.6x

NM

NM

6.5x

Company X

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

$22.70

Mean

NM

NM

NM

11.6x

6.3x

4.0x

NM

NM

25.8x

Median

NM

NM

NM

6.2x

6.7x

4.9x

NM

NM

25.8x

$16,633

Notes
1. Financials as per March 31, 2001 10-Q
2. Share prices as of 7/9/01

30

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\39

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Comparable Companies Exercise (contd)


Company X - Balance Sheet (000s)

As of
Mar. 31,
2001
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash & Cash Equivalents
Marketable Securities
Accounts Receivable
Receivables from related party
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Total current assets

$125,562
5,140
217,667
6,480
77,719
432,568

PP&E
Accumulated depreciation
PP&E, net

6,745,005
(1,244,119)
5,500,886

7,145,811
(1,878,292)
5,267,519

Other investments and deferred charges


Accumulated amortization
Deferred charges, net

18,950,985
(2,197,291)
16,753,694

18,947,631
(1,878,929)
17,068,702

Other assets
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Total current liabilities
Credit facilities
Notes outstanding
Other long-term debt
Deferred fees - related party
Other long-term liabilities
Minority interest
Redeemable securities
TOTAL LIABILITIES
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

$17,171
2,250
193,811
4,592
92,656
310,480

As of
Dec. 31,
2000

293,664

274,777

$22,858,724

$23,043,566

$1,169,766
1,169,766

$1,367,234
1,367,234

6,419,750
7,286,181
1,416

7,574,500
5,483,984
1,971

13,751
331,857
4,783,692
0
20,006,413

13,751
285,266
4,089,329
1,104,327
19,920,362

2,852,311

3,123,204

$22,858,724

$23,043,566

31

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\40

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Comparable Companies Exercise (contd)


Company X - Income Statement and Operating Projections (000s)
Three
Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2001
Revenues

Three
Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2000

$873,797

$3,249,222

$721,604

472,147
695,895
6,038
13,721
1,187,801

1,651,353
2,473,082
40,978
55,243
4,220,656

371,769
546,100
15,500
12,508
945,877

($314,004)

($971,434)

($224,273)

(310,832)
92
(59,917)
0
(370,657)

(1,059,130)
7,348
(19,262)
(12,467)
(1,083,511)

(230,914)
5,435
132
0
(225,347)

(684,661)

(2,054,945)

(449,620)

403,962

1,226,295

268,906

($280,699)

($828,650)

($180,714)

2001E

2002E

Revenue

$3,979.8

$4,790.0

EBITDA

1,823.2

2,152.9

Costs and Expenses


Operating, general and administrative
Depreciation and Amortization
Option compensation expense
Corporate expense charge

Operating Income (Loss)


Other income (expense)
Interest expense
Investment income
Income related to indexed debt
Equity in net losses (income) of affiliates

Operating income before tax and minority interest


Minority interest
Net income

Projections

(1)

($MM)

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

Year
Ended
Dec. 31, 2000

Notes
1. As per Morgan Stanley equity research

32

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\41

Project Training

Tab B

Precedent Transactions Analysis

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\42

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Precedent Transaction Analysis Overview


Uses

Valuing a business in a change of control situation


Provide statistics on particular transactions as basis for discussion
Display historic acquisition appetite of industry participants and determine willingness to pay full price
Determine the market demand for different types of assets (i.e., frequency of transactions and premiums paid)

Advantages

Disadvantages

Based on public information

Public data on past transactions can be limited and


misleading

Realistic in the sense that past transactions were


successfully completed at certain premiums. The
analysis therefore indicates a range of plausibility
for offered premiums

Precedent transactions are rarely directly


comparable

May show trends such as consolidation, foreign


acquirors, financial acquirors, etc.

Not all aspects of a transaction can be captured in


multiple valuation (e.g., commercial agreements,
governance issues)

Provides guidance to assess likely interlopers and


their willingness and ability to pay

Values obtained often vary over a wide range and


therefore can be of limited use
Market conditions at the time of a transaction can
have substantial influence on valuation (e.g.,
business cycle considerations, competitive
environment at the time of the transaction, scarcity
of the asset at the time of the transaction)

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

33

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\43

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Precedent Transactions Analysis


Unaffected Premium

Definition
Represents the premium of the offer price per share to the targets stock price before the
transaction was announced or rumored in the market. Usually this calculation is based on
the targets stock price four weeks prior to the announcement of the transaction
(unaffected price)
Issues
There often is more to a transaction than a simple sale of an asset/company
Commercial agreements
Governance issues (Board and management composition, headquarters)
Competitive environment at the time of the transaction
Scarcity of the relevant asset
It is necessary to include business cycle considerations in valuation
e.g., lower multiples are usually paid in peak industry years

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

34

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\44

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Identification of Precedent Transactions


The quality of PPaids analysis is based on the selection of the most applicable precedent
transactions
Industry: target companys business and financial characteristics should be comparable
Size of the deal: transactions that are close in size to the target that is being evaluated are more
relevant
Private deals: it is often very difficult to obtain information on private deals; news articles
may be the only available source
Morgan Stanley has a wide variety of information sources that help in selecting the appropriate
list of transactions for a precedent transactions analysis
The M&A Database (email MAData@msdw.com or call Rich Butler 1-7852) can do searches
by:
SIC codes
Time frame
Type of deal (e.g., completed only, completed and pending, completed and pending and
terminated, U.S. only, U.S. and international)
Transaction value
The relevant Morgan Stanley Corporate Finance industry group
Merger Proxies of transactions in the relevant industry, which may list comparable transactions
Industry and trade publications
Research reports

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

35

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\45

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Ppaids Output
Overview

Premiums Paid usually appear in one or two-page format


In two-page format, the first page will focus on the business/assets acquired, consideration used
and the other terms of the transaction
The second, or only, page of the output will list the announcement date, acquiror/acquiree,
aggregate value and equity value of the deal, appropriate industry multiples and the premium to
the unaffected stock price
Multiples

Aggregate Value Paid


Output contains two categories pertaining to aggregate value paid. Equity column represents
only the equity paid. Aggregate Value represents Equity + Debt - Cash. Use Aggregate
Value for the exhibit. There may be a time lag between the date of the transaction and the
disclosure/listing of the Aggregate Value
Aggregate Value/ EBITDA
Aggregate Value/EBIT
Calculate LTM EBITDA and LTM EBIT using the financial statements from the time of the
Transaction
Aggregate Value / LTM Revenues
Calculate Equity Value as described above
Revenues listed on Premiums Paid output are usually on a LTM basis. Use appropriate annual
or 10-Q to verify. Note that there typically is a 25-30 day lag between the end of a fiscal
quarter and the announcement of quarterly revenues and earnings

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

36

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\46

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Ppaids Output (contd)


Equity Value / Book Value
Equity Value / Book Value of Total Cap ratio can be substituted for Price / Book Value of
Equity. Check with a team member to determine the appropriate ratio
Calculate Book Value of Total Cap by summing the Total Debt, Preferred, and Common
Equity accounts from the annual report or 10-Q that corresponds with the date of the
transaction. Note that there is a 45-day lag between the end of a fiscal quarter and the required
filing date, and a 90-day lag in the case of annual reports
NTM P/E
Divide the transaction price per share by the next twelve months (NTM) EPS - see Factset for
the NTM EPS at time of announcement
Price / Cash Flow
The Price / Cash Flow category is not always standard on the premiums paid exhibit. Check
with team members to ascertain whether or not inclusion of P/CF is appropriate
Take the stock price from the date of transaction
Take the LTM operating cash flow from the companys financial statements. Do not include
changes in working capital, other income or extraordinary items in this calculation. Divide
cash flow by the average number of shares outstanding for the period preceding the transaction
to calculate per share cash flow
Premium Paid Above Market

These values are usually listed for the month prior, day prior and day after the transaction

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

37

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\47

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Precedent Transactions Analysis


Precedent Transactions
Date
Announced

Target/Acquiror

Target Business Description

Deal Highlights

11/12/98

Heritage Bathrooms PLC/Masco Corp

A U.K. manufacturer and distributor of


residential bathroom products

220p ($3.70) per share. Earn-outs


could rasie price to $76.8MM

2/17/98

Zurn Industries/U.S. Industries

A leading manufacturer of plumbing and


bath products

1.6 USI shares for each Zurn share.


Creating the no. 2 NA bath-plumbing
Co.

9/30/97

Creative Specialties Inc./Moen Inc.


(Fortune Brands Inc.)

A leading bathroom accessories


company, selling products primarily
under the CSI-Donner brand name

N/A

3/20/97

Falcon Building Products/Investcorp

A leading NA manufacturer and supplier


of highly engineered building products
serving residential, light commercial and
consumer markets

$17.75 per share LBO

3/4/97

Geberit International SA/Doughty


Hanson & Co.

Family owned Swiss company, Europes


leading manufacturer of sanitary ware
and plumbing systems

LBO

12/16/96

Eljer Industries Inc./Zurn Industries Inc.

A leading manufacturer and marketer of


building products

$24 per share Cash offer

8/28/85

Porcher/American Standard Companies

A French manufacturer an distributor of


plumbing products

7/23/90

Ceramica Dolomite SpA Blue Circle


Industries PLC

Italys leading manufacturer of ceramic


building products

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

Agg. Val/
Eq. Val.
$MM

LTM Multiples (x)

Current Forward Year Multiples (x)

Premium to
unaffected Price
%

67.6
67.6

Agg Val. / Sales


Agg Val. / EBITDA
Agg Val. / EBIT
Eq. Val. / N.I.
Eq. Val. / Book Val

1.8n 2.1
N/A
8.9 10.1
12.3 14.0
N/A

Agg Val. / Sales


Agg Val. / EBITDA
Agg Val. / EBIT
Eq. Val. / N.I.

N/A
N/A
N/A
10.7 12.1

41

765.0
555.0

Agg Val. / Sales


Agg Val. / EBITDA
Agg Val. / EBIT
Eq. Val. / N.I.
Eq. Val. / Book Val

1.3
9.5
12.1
16.8
2.2

Agg Val. / Sales


Agg Val. / EBITDA
Agg Val. / EBIT
Eq. Val. / N.I.

1.2
8.0
10.1
17.0

38

30.0

Agg Val. / Sales


Agg Val. / EBITDA
Agg Val. / EBIT
Eq. Val. / N.I.
Eq. Val. / Book Val

0.6
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

Agg Val. / Sales


Agg Val. / EBITDA
Agg Val. / EBIT
Eq. Val. / N.I.

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A

590.0
365.0

Agg Val. / Sales


Agg Val. / EBITDA
Agg Val. / EBIT
Eq. Val. / N.I.
Eq. Val. / Book Val

0.9
7.7
9.7
11.9
10.7

Agg Val. / Sales


Agg Val. / EBITDA
Agg Val. / EBIT
Eq. Val. / N.I.

1.0
7.7
9.3
12.5

1,210.5

Agg Val. / Sales


Agg Val. / EBITDA
Agg Val. / EBIT
Eq. Val. / N.I.
Eq. Val. / Book Val

2.0
N/A
12.9
N/A
N/A

Agg Val. / Sales


Agg Val. / EBITDA
Agg Val. / EBIT
Eq. Val. / N.I.

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A

254.3
172.9

Agg Val. / Sales


Agg Val. / EBITDA
Agg Val. / EBIT
Eq. Val. / N.I.
Eq. Val. / Book Val

0.6
6.8
9.0
13.5
N/M

Agg Val. / Sales


Agg Val. / EBITDA
Agg Val. / EBIT
Eq. Val. / N.I.

0.6
N/A
N/A
N/A

88

$25MM for 67% stake ASD does not


already own, plus assume $35.7MM
debt

73.0

Agg Val. / Sales


Agg Val. / EBITDA
Agg Val. / EBIT
Eq. Val. / N.I.
Eq. Val. / Book Val

0.3
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

Agg Val. / Sales


Agg Val. / EBITDA
Agg Val. / EBIT
Eq. Val. / N.I.

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A

N/A

66.3

Agg Val. / Sales


Agg Val. / EBITDA
Agg Val. / EBIT
Eq. Val. / N.I.
Eq. Val. / Book Val

0.9
N/A
6.6
12.8
N/A

Agg Val. / Sales


Agg Val. / EBITDA
Agg Val. / EBIT
Eq. Val. / N.I.

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A

38

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\48

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

Precedent Transaction Worksheet


Analyst Exercise

Target Acquisition Value

Key Facts
Name

Industry

Country

Advisor

Target

Time Warner

Media

USA

Morgan/WP

Target Offer Price Per Share

Acquiror

AOL

Technology

USA

SSB/ML/GS

Fully diluted shares outstanding (MM)

Announcement Date

1/10/00

Equity Value

Status
(Closed/Pending)

Closed

Option Proceeds (-)

Target Offer Price Per Share

Short-Term Debt (+)

26.0

Long-Term Debt (+)

17,812.0

Minority Interest (-)

3,175.0

Cash & Cash Equivalents (-)

Acquiror Price Per Share (One Day Prior)

645.0

Aggregate Value ($MM)

Exchange Ratio

Target Historic Data (LTM)

Premium Data

$MM

($)
$27,333

EBITDA

8,564

EBIT

6,035

Net Income

1,896

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

2,982.0

Total Equity Value ($MM)

Exchange Ratio

Sales

1,434,585

Target Share Price 1 day


before Announcement

Transaction Multiples
$64.75

Target Share Price 30 days


before announcement

65.13

Target Share Price 1 day


after announcement

86.13

Target Share Price 30 Day


after announcement

85.19

Acquiror share price 1 day


before announcement

73.00

Acquiror share price 1 day


after announcement

64.00

Acquiror share price 30 days


after announcement

58.50

Agg. Value/LTM Sales

Agg. Value/LTM EBITDA

Agg. Value/LTM EBIT

Equity Value/LTM Earnings

Premium to Unaffected Share Price


(Consideration/Share Price
30 days before announcement)

39

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\49

Project Training

Market-Based Valuation

AOL / Time Warner Press Release


America Online and Time Warner Will Merge to Create World's First
Internet-Age Media and Communications Company
AOL Time Warner Will Be Premier Global Company
Delivering Branded Information, Entertainment and
Communications Across Rapidly Converging Media
Platforms and Changing Technology
DULLES, VIRGINIA and NEW YORK, NEW YORK, January 10, 2000 -America
Online, Inc. [NYSE:AOL] and Time Warner Inc. [NYSE:TWX] today
announced a strategic merger of equals to create the world's first fully
integrated media and communications company for the Internet Century in
an all-stock combination valued at $350 billion.
Under the terms of a definitive merger agreement approved by unanimous
votes at meetings of each company's board of directors, Time Warner and
America Online stock will be converted to AOL Time Warner stock at fixed
exchange ratios. The Time Warner shareholders will receive 1.5 shares of
AOL Time Warner for each share of Time Warner stock they own. America
Online shareholders will receive one share of AOL Time Warner stock for
each share of America Online stock they own.

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

40

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\51

Project Training

Section 4

Intrinsic Valuation

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\52

Project Training

Tab C

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\53

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis Overview


Uses

Intrinsic Valuation of the business as a going concern


What a potential buyer should pay for a business
The DCF is used as an additional point of reference when valuing a company because it
provides a theoretical benchmark, independent of market biases or control premia

Advantages

Disadvantages

Theoretically, the most sound valuation method

Valuation is highly sensitive to underlying


assumptions for cash flows (i.e., validity of
projections), terminal value calculation and
discount rate

Forward looking analysis, based on cash flow (less


affected by accounting rules than net income);
incorporates expected operating strategy into the
model
Less influenced by volatile public market
conditions
Allows a valuation of the separate components of a
business or synergies separately from the business

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

Terminal value often represents significant portion


of total value
Impervious to market dynamics and associated
control premia, theoretical valuation may
misrepresent what would actually be paid for a
business

41

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\54

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Introduction to DCF Analysis


DCF value is simply the present value of the projected cash flows of a business
Cash flows are discounted to reflect the time value of money and the riskiness of the asset
DCF analysis yields the value of the assets of a business, regardless of how it is capitalized
Capitalization impacts value only through weighted average cost of capital (WACC)
Unlevered Free Cash Flow is the cash generated
By all of the assets employed in the business
Without regard to capital structure and financing (thus unlevered)
Available to all providers of capital
Differentiate between definitions of
Cash flow from operations
Cash flow available for debt service (levered free cash flow)
Unlevered free cash flow
Key steps
Identify key value drivers
Use the management case as the basic outline
Develop sensitivity scenarios
Determine the methodology for the Terminal Value calculation (i.e., perpetual growth rate,
asset/equity multiple)
Calculate the WACC to discount cash flows
MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

42

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\55

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Calculating Unlevered Free Cash Flows


Definition

Unlevered Free Cash Flow is Defined as


Net Income

Depreciation
Amortization
Change in Deferred Taxes
Other Non-Cash Charges
After-Tax Interest Expense

Capital Expenditures
Investment in Working Capital

Unlevered Free Cash Flow

Cash Flow Adjustments

Depreciation, amortization, change in deferred taxes and other non-cash charges are added back to Net Income
Assumes that these items were already deducted from Net Income
These items are added back at 100% of the amount and not tax adjusted because no cash was spent on these
items
Interest expense is added back net of tax effect
As interest expense is deductible for tax purposes, lower taxes are paid as a result of interest expense
Therefore, only the after-tax effect of interest has to be added back
Capital Expenditures and other uses of cash
Outflows of cash required to run the business that are not reflected by the income statement
Investment in working capital
Investment in inventories is typically required as sales increase
As sales increase, more sales will be made on trade (accounts receivable); the implication is that not all sales on
the income statement, which flow through to net income, are cash and an adjustment has to be made
Working Capital: the difference between non-cash current assets and current liabilities, excluding short-term
debt
Only make adjustment to cash flow for the incremental changes in working capital accounts
MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

43

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\56

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Discounting Unlevered Free Cash Flows (contd)


At what point during the year do the cash flows occur?
In reality, cash flows occur throughout the year level vs. seasonal
Assuming that all cash flows occur at the end of the year, as many practitioners do, is therefore
inaccurate
Morgan Stanley assumes cash flows occur in the middle of the period, e.g.,
December 31 fiscal year end: UFCFs are assumed to occur on June 30
August 31 fiscal year end: UFCFs are assumed to occur on February 28

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

44

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\57

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Mid-Period Convention
Cash Flow #1 Valuation Date 6/30/01

CF1

12/31/00

6/30/01

12/31/01

We only receive 6/12 of CF1

12/31/00

12/31/00

6/30/01

12/31/01

Valuation Date

We assume that the cash flow


occurs in the middle of the
period

6/30/01

9/30/01

12/31/01
...therefore we discount back
only 3/12 of a year to obtain the
present value

12/31/00

6/30/01
Present Value of
Cash Flow #1

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

9/30/01

12/31/01

(CF1*6/12)
(1+r)3/12

45

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\58

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Mid-Period Convention (contd)

PV1 =

(CF1*6/12)
(1+r)3/12

Again, we assume the cash flow


occurs in the middle of the
period

CF1
12/31/00
12/31/

6/30/01

12/31/01
9/30/01

3/12

PVTOTAL = PV1 + PV2 + PV3 + PV4


PV2 =

CF2
(1+r)1

CF2
12/31/00

6/30/01

Valuation Date

12/31/01

6/30/02

12/31/02

1
PV3 =

CF3
(1+r)2

CF3
12/31/00

6/30/01

12/31/01

6/30/02

12/31/02

6/30/03

12/31/03

2
PV4 =

CF4
(1+r)3

CF4
12/31/00

6/30/01

12/31/01

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

6/30/02

12/31/02

6/30/03

12/31/03

6/30/04

12/31/04

46

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\59

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Mid-Period Convention (contd)


Cash flows CF2 to CF4 are
discounted back to 6/30/01;
therefore, we have to
discount the sum of
PV2 + PV3 + PV4 by one half
year to solve for the present
value at 12/31/00

PV1 =

CF1
(1+r)6/12

CF1
12/31/00

6/30/01

12/31/01

6/12
PV2 =

PVTOTAL = PV1 +

CF2

PV2 + PV3 + PV4


(1+r)6/12

(1+r)1
CF2
12/31/00

6/30/01

12/31/01

6/30/02

12/31/02

1
Valuation Date
PV3 =

CF3
(1+r)2

CF3
12/31/00

6/30/01

12/31/01

6/30/02

12/31/02

6/30/03

12/31/03

2
PV4 =

CF4
(1+r)3

CF4
12/31/00

6/30/01

12/31/01
1

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

6/30/02

12/31/02
2

6/30/03

12/31/03

6/30/04

12/31/04

47

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\60

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Terminal Value
When we perform a DCF analysis, we project cash flows for N years and then estimate a
terminal value for the ongoing value of the business beyond year N. (Alternatively, the
terminal value can be viewed as the sale price of the business in year N)
There are two basic methodologies employed at Morgan Stanley to calculate a terminal value:
(1) apply a multiple to a specified financial statistic (EBITDA, EBIT, Net Income) in the
terminal year, or
(2) assume a growing perpetuity based on the terminal years cash flow. Both of these
methodologies are discussed on the following pages

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

48

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\61

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Terminal Value (contd)


Multiple Method
Assumes the business is sold at the end of the projection period
Use the most appropriate multiple or range of multiples for the Companys industry (overlap
with comps methodology)
Be careful when applying LTM vs. forward multiples
The multiple method assumes terminal value occurs at the end of the final period (as compared
to the cash flows, which are assumed to occur at mid-year)
Asset multiples: sales, EBITDA, or EBIT
Equity multiples: net income
Unlevered free cash flows yield Asset Values, so if you use an equity multiple, you must
convert the result to an asset value by adding net debt in the last year to the equity value
Relevering: as the Company has paid down debt over the forecast period, a multiple
valuation based on net income may have to be based on an adjusted net income
Perpetual Growth Method
Assumes unlevered FCFs continue in perpetuity, growing at some constant rate
Choosing growth rate for perpetuity requires careful thought
Always cross-reference with multiple method
Note that if the implied P/E multiple is out of line, this is probably due primarily to the capital
structure of the Company in the terminal year
Normalize terminal year earnings
MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

49

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\62

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Terminal Value
Multiple Method

EBITDA and EBIT are both aggregate value multiples used to calculate the terminal value
Example

12/31/00

The unlevered free cash flows are assumed to come in the middle of the
period...

12/31/01

12/31/02

12/31/03

12/31/04
but the EBITDA/EBIT statistics are period-end

Valuation Date
Steps
1) Based on the number of periods of cash flow (e.g., 5 periods vs. 10 periods) select the
EBITDA or EBIT statistic of the final period
2) Analyze the comps and p-paids to select a reasonable range of multiples
3) Multiply the EBITDA/EBIT statistic times the multiple
4) Discount the final period terminal value back to the valuation date

12/31/00

12/31/01

12/31/02

12/31/04

12/31/03

Valuation Date

EBITDA
* Multiple = Terminal Value in Final Period
or
EBIT

Discount Terminal Value in final period back


to the valuation date
12/31/00

12/31/01

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

12/31/02

12/31/03

12/31/04

TV =

T.V. Final Period


(1+r)4

50

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\63

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Terminal Value
Perpetual Growth Rate Method

The perpetual growth rate represents the growth rate of the unleveled free cash flows into perpetuity (the PGR
assumes that the entity will continue to be a going concern)
Example
The unlevered free cash flows are assumed to occur
in the middle of the period

12/31/00

12/31/01

12/31/02

12/31/04

Steps
1) Based on the number of periods of cash flow (e.g., 5 periods vs. 10 periods)
select the unlevered free cash flow statistic of the final period
2) Analyze the comps to select a reasonable range of growth rates and/or ask
your deal team for guidance
3) Solve for the terminal value at the valuation date

Valuation Date

12/31/00

12/31/03

12/31/01

12/31/02

12/31/03

12/31/04

TV Final Period =

Unlevered FCF *(1+g)


(r-g)

Because the cash flow occurs in the


middle of the period we only need to
discount back 3 periods
Valuation Date

Discount the Terminal Value in the final period back


to the valuation date
TV =

TV Final Period
(1+r)3

12/31/99

12/31/00

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

12/31/01

12/31/02

12/31/03

12/31/04

51

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\64

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Implied Terminal Value Multiples


Perpetual Growth Rate Method

Aggregate Value Multiples

Sales

EBITDA

EBIT

TV Final Period * (1 + r)6/12

Multiple =

EBITDA, EBIT or Sales of Final Period

The PGR terminal value is calculated off the mid-period unlevered


free cash flow statistic...

12/31/00

12/31/01

12/31/02

12/31/03

12/31/04

the Sales, EBITDA, or EBIT statistic is


period end...

hence, we have to bring the terminal value forward


one half period. (End Period Terminal Value and
End Period Sales,EBITDA, or EBIT = Apples to Apples)

Equity Value Multiples

Net Income

Make sure to bring to the PGR TV forward to


period end

TV Final Period * (1 + r)6/12 - Net Debt of Final Period


Multiple =
Net Income of Final Period

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

52

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\65

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Comparison of Terminal Value Methodologies


Multiple Method

Perpetual Growth Method

Assumes business/assets are sold at the end of the


projection period at current multiple valuation
levels

Assumes going concern


Be sure to cross reference with implied exit
multiples

When choosing an exit multiple consider


Current level of valuation (bullish, bearish)
Apply normalized multiple to normalized
earnings

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

53

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\66

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Normalizing Earnings
DCF valuation in general is very sensitive to the calculation of terminal value; it is therefore
important to make sure that the assumptions underlying the terminal value are reasonable
Normalizing operating assumptions
The sales and operating margin assumptions for the final year should reflect an average year
(not bottom or top of the business cycle)
Depreciation and capital expenditures should be within the same range (steady state)
Normalizing financial structure
Assumptions for debt paydown and use of cash generated over the projection period affect the
capital structure of the company over time
When applying multiples for value calculations, earnings may have to be adjusted to reflect
optimal or typical capital structure

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

54

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\67

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Weighted Average Cost of Capital


Concept

Cost of Equity

Capital Asset Pricing Model defines the cost of equity of a particular company as
Cost of Equity = Risk Free Rate + Beta x Market Risk Premium

10-year U.S. Treasury is used


as an approximation of risk free
investment return

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

Represents the financial and


systemic business risk of the
particular company vs. the
overall market portfolio (e.g.,
1 = risk equivalent to market
portfolio)

Expected long-term premium of


the overall market portfolio over
a risk free investment (currently
defined at 4%)

The Beta of any particular company reflects (i) the systemic business risk of the company; and (ii) the financial
risk (risk due to leverage of the company)

Individual company betas are estimated by several public sources (Barra, etc.)

55

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\68

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Weighted Average Cost of Capital (contd)


Concept

Calculating the Cost of Equity for a Particular Company

Starts with the Predicted Equity Beta of comparable companies

These Betas reflect the systemic business and financial risk of the various companies. In order to adjust for
leverage, Betas of the comparable companies have to be unlevered

Levered Beta
Unlevered Beta =

1 + (D/E)(1-t) + (Pref./E)

The mean/median of the unlevered Betas of the comparable companies serves as an approximation of the
systemic business risk of the company being valued. To reflect the financial risk we relever the Beta with the
desired financial structure (usually a range)

Using the Capital Asset Pricing Model we can now calculate the cost of equity of the target company
(Rf = risk free rate, Rp = risk premium)
Cost of Equity = Rf+(Levered Beta) * Rp

With simple weighting we can now calculate the Weighted Average Cost of Capital for the target company
(V = total capitalization)

WACC = Cost of Equity x (E/V) + Cost of Debt x (D/V)(1-t) + Cost of Preferred (Pref./V)

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

56

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\69

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Weighted Average Cost of Capital


As the beta reflects business risk it differs between industries. In general, one can differentiate
between defensive and cyclical industries
Defensive industries are on average less volatile than the market and therefore have a beta
between 0 and 1 (e.g., consumer goods)
Cyclical industries are on average more volatile than the market and therefore have a beta
greater than 1 (e.g., high tech., biochemical)
Within an industry group betas of specific companies vary due to numerous factors such as
Business mix (product, geography)
Financial leverage
Development stage (start up vs. long-term industry participant)

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

57

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\70

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis


Summary

The DCF analysis is based on the future performance of a business. It is therefore highly
dependent on assumptions for
The underlying business model
The valuation benchmark and the financial statistics underlying the terminal value calculation
The discount rate
The underlying business model should be based on management estimates. Cross references to
historical operating performance as well as to peer group operating performance are necessary
(reality check)
Different terminal value calculation methodologies should be used as a reality check
Discount rate should be based on the WACC. Make sure that the target capital structure makes
sense within an industry context and the cost of debt reflects the level of leverage

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

58

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\71

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Top Nine Pitfalls of DCF Analysis

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

1.

Expecting the Morgan Stanley model to be correct

2.

After-tax interest addback

3.

Discounting conventions calculated incorrectly

4.

Working capital changes

5.

First-year cash flow not adjusted

6.

Terminal value discounting adjusted for mid-period convention

7.

Perpetual growth vs. terminal multiple

8.

Debt/Equity in the WACC

9.

Cost of Debt in WACC calculation

59

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\72

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Pencil and Paper Exercise Part I


Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)

Comparable Companies
Company X

Comp A

Comp B

Comp C

.75

1.35

.87

900

800

950

400

100

100

2,200

2,400

475

700

9%

7%

10%

8%

Predicted Equity Beta


Debt
Preferred
Equity
Cost of Debt
Tax Rate = 40%
Risk Free Rate = 5.3%
Unlevered Beta
Cost of Equity for Company X
WACC for Company X

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

60

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\73

Project Training

Intrinsic Valuation

Pencil and Paper Exercise Part II


Information Company X
($MM)

12/31/00

12/31/01

12/31/02

12/31/03

1,400

1,500

1,550

1,600

110

120

130

140

Depreciation & Amortization

50

50

50

50

Change in Deferred Tax

20

20

20

20

Change in Other non-cash items

10

10

10

10

Change in non-cash Current Assets

37

37

37

37

Change in Current Liabilities


(excluding Short-term Debt)

30

30

30

30

Capital Expenditures

70

60

65

50

Net Income
P/T Interest Expense (Tax Rate = 40%)

Unlevered Free Cash Flow


Valuation Information
Valuation Date:

September 30, 2001

Terminal Value Method:

Perpetual Growth Rate (assume 4%)

Discount Rate (WACC):

Calculated in Part I

Answers
PV of Cf1 =

PV of Terminal Value

PV of Cf2-5 =

PVTotal
% of PVTotal in
Terminus

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

61

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\75

Project Training

Section 5

Merger Accounting/Analysis

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\76

Project Training

Tab D

Summary

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\77

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

Merger Analysis
Summary

The merger analysis focuses on


Exchange ratio and pro forma ownership percentages for merger parties (in transactions with
stock consideration)
Pro forma financial impact to merged parties (earnings accretion/dilution, credit implications)
Value accretion/dilution
The exchange ratio and, therefore, pro forma ownership determine the split of the pie
Earnings accretion/dilution and multiple expansion/contraction determine the size of the pie
The analysis incorporates both the impact of the transaction to pro forma earnings and potential
capital markets reactions in terms of re-assessing P/E multiple (expansion/contraction)
The merger analysis can be based on static and/or dynamic models, which require different
levels of detail
For the purpose of Morgan Stanley Training we will focus on static merger models, i.e., mini
merger models. Note: A dynamic model is not always necessary to provide meaningful
insights
Goals of a successful merger
Maximize pro forma EPS and growth
Maximize credit rating (not specifically accounting related)
Maximize financial performance ratios
Impact of accounting treatment
Can play a significant role in transaction
Post-merger earnings can affect stock price
MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

62

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\78

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

Overview of Merger Analysis


Contribution Analysis

Accretion/Dilution Analysis

Value Creation Analysis

Compares % contribution
of operating and market
value statistics from
transaction partners to
pro forma combined
entity

Compares the pro forma


financial impact of
transaction on transaction
partners (e.g., earnings
per share accretion/
dilution, pro forma credit
implications)

Analyzes potential share


price implications for
existing shareholders

Historical
Projected

Static analysis (mini


merger model)
Dynamic analysis

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

63

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\79

Project Training

Tab E

Accounting Issues

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\80

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

New Accounting Rules


In 2001 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) instituted a change in the way
that mergers are accounted for
Prior to the decision, two accounting systems existed for merger transactions
Under pooling accounting, all assets were valued at their historic book value
Under purchase accounting, the acquirer was required to recognize the full value of the
target and record a goodwill asset of the value of the purchase price over the fair value of
the target. This goodwill was amortized over a period of years and decreased the targets
net income by the amortization amount
Pooling accounting has been eliminated and the purchase accounting system has been
substantially modified
The new method of accounting for mergers is discussed in the following pages
It is still unclear how these accounting changes will ultimately impact the market
Though the FASB has issued an initial ruling, they have yet to provide clarification on
many specifics of the new system
There will be a multitude of effects on M&A activity, corporate earnings and valuation,
financial statement presentation and specific industries

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

64

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\81

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

Core Principles
Business Combinations Statement Key Points

Purchase accounting is required for all business combinations initiated after


June 30, 2001, thereby eliminating the use of the pooling-of-interests
method
The purchase price is allocated first to net tangible assets (i.e., acquired
assets and assumed liabilities) and then to identifiable intangible assets. Any
residual is attributed to goodwill
An identifiable intangible asset must be recognized separately from
goodwill
Identifiable intangible asset is an asset which meets one of the following
criteria:
The asset arises from contractual or other legal rights (e.g., trademarks, royalties,
construction permits or franchise agreements) or
The asset is separable from the acquired company and can be sold, licensed, rented,
exchanged or pledged (e.g., customer lists, databases or unpatented technology)

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

65

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\82

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

Core Principles (contd)


Goodwill and Intangible Assets Statement Key Points

Goodwill will no longer be amortized and will be tested for impairment at least annually
Goodwill will be allocated across reporting units which will be the same level as (or one level
below) an operating segment
Goodwill impairment will take place if the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its book
value including goodwill
An impairment loss is measured as the excess of recorded goodwill over its implied fair value.
The implied fair value of goodwill should be calculated in the same manner that goodwill is
calculated when a business is acquired
Some amount of goodwill should be allocated to a significant amount of a reporting unit that is
sold or disposed of. This goodwill should be included in the gain/loss recognition of the
disposed reporting unit
Other intangible assets should be amortized over their useful life and reviewed for impairment
in a similar way to tangible assets
An intangible asset (other than goodwill) with an indefinite life (i.e., life that exceeds beyond
the foreseeable horizon) should not be amortized until its life is determined to be finite
A benchmark assessment should be completed before the annual impairment review. The
benchmark assessment will document and identify the net assets and the goodwill associated
with the reporting unit as well as the model and the key assumptions used to measure the fair
value of the reporting unit

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

66

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\83

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

Core Principles (contd)


Financial Statement Presentation and Disclosure

The aggregate amount of goodwill as well as other intangible assets must be


presented as separate line items on the balance sheet
Goodwill impairment loss must be presented as a separate line item in the
operating section of the income statement. The portion of goodwill associated
with net assets to be disposed of must be recognized as part of the gain or loss
on disposal, not as an impairment loss
Amortization expense and impairment losses for intangible assets other than
goodwill should be presented in the operating section of the income statement
For a significant business combination the acquiring company has to disclose
information about the transaction including the reasons for the acquisition,
purchase price allocation to assets and liabilities, identifiable intangible assets,
and goodwill

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

67

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\84

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

Core Principles (contd)


Transition and Effective Date

As a result of this transitional


period, over the next 12
months companies may not
be reporting financials that
are comparable on an
apples-to-apples basis
In any analysis it will be
necessary to diligence each
companys financial
reporting and ensure that
EPS estimates are
comparable
If companies are reporting
EPS under the old
accounting provision, their
numbers will have to be
adjusted for the new
amortization of intangibles

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

New goodwill and identifiable intangible assets with indefinite life, which are acquired in
transactions completed after June 30, 2001, will not be amortized.
For existing goodwill and identifiable intangible assets the nonamortization and impairment
rules will apply for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001
However, early adoption of the Statement will be permitted for companies with a fiscal year
beginning after March 15, 2001, for which first quarter financial statements have not been
issued

Companies with different fiscal year ends when can they stop amortizing goodwill?
31-Mar

Q1 2001 if the financials for Q1 are not issued before the new standard is in force

30-Jun

Q1 statements ending Sept 30, 2001 or Sept 30, 2002

31-Dec

Q1 2002 ending March 31, 2002

68

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\85

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

Core Principles (contd)


Transition and Effective Date

No retroactive adjustment is allowed but pro forma information excluding amortization


will be provided
Accordingly, most companies will now have to wait until Q1 2002 to eliminate
amortization of existing goodwill, while all new goodwill will no longer need to be
amortized
The useful economic life of previously recognized intangible assets should be reassessed
upon adoption of the Statement, and remaining amortization periods should be adjusted
accordingly
Intangible assets deemed to have an indefinite life will not be amortized any longer
A benchmark assessment should be completed within six months of the date of adopting
the Statement for each reporting unit that includes goodwill (referred to as a transitional
benchmark assessment)
Any impairment loss due to the adoption of the Standard will be reflected as a change in
accounting principle and will be attributed to the first quarter regardless of when the
impairment is calculated during the year. Subsequent impairments should be reported as
operating losses

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

69

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\86

Project Training

Tab F

Contribution Analysis

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\87

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

Contribution Analysis
Compares % contribution of
operating and market value
statistics from transaction
partners to pro forma
combined entity

Asset Value (Unlevered) Parameters

Equity Value (Levered) Parameters

Sales

Net Income

Gross Margin

Equity Value

EBITDA

Levered Free Cash Flow

EBIT
Aggregate Value
Unlevered Free Cash Flow

Example
Company A
$

Contribution
%

Contribution
%

Sales

6,298

56

5,000

44

EBITDA

1,216

60

800

40

EBIT

1,024

63

600

37

569

62

350

38

Net Income

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

Company B

70

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\88

Project Training

Tab G

Mini-Merger Analysis

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\89

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

The Mini-Merger Model


Objectives

Understand the purpose of a basic mini-merger model and how it is used


Understand the mechanics behind the mini-merger
Calendarization of earnings estimates
Determining purchase price form of consideration (Cash vs Stock)
Income statement adjustments
Accretion/dilution
Breakeven synergies analysis

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

71

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\90

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

The Mini-Merger Model


Overview

The mini-merger model is a useful tool to use when trying to complete a back of the envelope
merger analysis for a potential acquisition
The mini-merger model is used to calculate earnings per share (EPS) accretion/dilution
What is earnings accretion/dilution?
The percentage change in a companys EPS as a result of a merger/acquisition/divestiture
compared to its standalone EPS
Why do we do it?
Provides an estimate of positive or negative change in stock price for those companies valued
on a multiple of EPS
Helps predict whether existing shareholders will favor or oppose proposed transaction
Basic methodology
Determine standalone EPS/Net Income for target and acquiror on same basis, using public data
sources (IBES, First Call, Equity Research)
Determine purchase price, form of consideration (i.e., mix of cash and stock)
Calculate income statement adjustments
amortization of intangibles
tax-affected interest expense
change in common dividend
shares issued
possible goodwill impairment
after tax synergies
Calculate pro forma EPS and compare to standalone EPS
MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

72

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\91

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

The Mini-Merger Model (contd)


Step 1: Determine Standalone EPS/Net Income on Same Basis

Form of EPS: basic and


diluted
Source of Earnings
Estimates
Public Companies (IBES,
First Call, Morgan Stanley
Research)
Median Earnings
Estimates

Acquiror
Fiscal Year Ending September 30,

EPS Diluted ($)

2000A

2001E

2002E

2003E

3.59

4.15

4.75

5.37

16

14

13

% Growth
Avg. Diluted Shares Out. (MM)

63.0

63.0

63.0

63.0

Net Income ($)

226

262

299

338

16

14

13

% Growth

Long-Term Growth Rate


Private Companies/
Divisions of Companies
Management/MSDW
estimates
Over the next 12 months
analysts should take
particular care when using
EPS estimates, because
companies will be
transitioning to the new
accounting standard at
different times
Different companies EPS
estimates may not be
comparable without
additional adjustments
for amortization of
intangibles
MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

Target
Fiscal Year Ending December 31,

EPS Diluted ($)

2000A

2001E

2002E

2003E

1.35

1.73

2.13

2.60

28

23

22

16.0

16.0

16.0

16.0

22

28

34

42

28

23

22

% Growth
Avg. Diluted Shares Out. (MM)
Net Income ($)
% Growth

73

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\92

Merger Accounting/Analysis

Project Training

Mini-Merger Model
Step 1: Determine Standalone EPS/Net Income on Same Basis

Acquiror has a Sept. 30th Fiscal Year End (FYE). Target has a Dec. 31st FYE
Restate Targets Net Income to Acquirors fiscal year end

Acquiror
FY00 = $262

FY01 = $299

3 mo.

9 mo.

FY99 = $22

FY00 = $28

Restated FY00 =
3 Mo. FY99 + 9 Mo. FY00 = $26

FY02 = $338

M A M

3 mo.

9 mo.
FY01 = $34

Restated FY01 =
3 Mo. FY00 + 9 Mo. FY01 = $32

3 mo.

M J

A S

9 mo.
FY02 = $42

Restated FY02 =
3 Mo. FY01 + 9 Mo. FY02 = $40

Target
MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

74

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\93

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

The Mini-Merger Model


Step 2: Determine Purchase Price, Form of Consideration & Accounting Treatment

Acquiror purchases Target by paying a 25% premium to targets current stock price ($20.00)
Price Paid Per Share

= Target current stock price * (1 + Premium)


= $20.00 * (1 + 0.25)
= $25.00

Total Consideration Offered

= Price Paid Per Share * Total Target Shares Outstanding


(diluted)
= $25.00 * 16.0MM Fully-Diluted Shares Outstanding
= $400MM

Acquiror finances the purchase of Targets equity with 50% stock and 50% cash

Sources
%

Debt/Cash

200

50

Stock

200

50

$400

100

Total

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

Uses
$MM

Stock

$MM

400

100

$400

100

75

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\94

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

The Mini-Merger Model


Step 3A: Income Statement Adjustments Goodwill & Intangibles

The amount that a purchaser pays over the book value of the target must be allocated between
goodwill, identifiable intangibles, and asset step-up
This excess purchase price can be calculated as follows:
Purchase Price - Book Value = Excess Purchase Price
$400MM - $200MM = $200MM
Ultimately the amount of intangibles and goodwill will be determined by accountants.
However, in performing a mini-merger we can make the simplifying assumption that the
Excess Purchase Price is split evenly between identifiable intangibles and goodwill (with no
step-up in asset value)
50% * Excess Purchase Price = Goodwill
.5 * $200 = $100MM
50% * Excess Purchase Price = Identifiable Intangibles
.5 * $200 = $100MM
These intangibles are amortized over a determined period of time (this time period depends
upon the average useful life of the intangibles) to calculate the annual amortization
$100MM / 20 = $5MM

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

76

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\95

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

The Mini-Merger Model


Step 3B: Income Statement Adjustments Interest(1)

If the acquiror uses debt to finance purchase, the tax-affected interest expense on the debt is
deducted from earnings
Interest expense is tax-deductible
Therefore, as interest paid increases, income and taxes are lower
The tax-affected interest expense takes into account this tax shielding effect of interest
Tax-affect by multiplying interest expense by (1 - tax rate)
Calculation of Interest Expense (After-tax)
Assume interest rate of 8% and tax rate of 40%
After tax interest expense = debt raised * interest expense * (1 - tax rate)
$200MM * 8% * (140%) = $10MM/Year

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

Note
1. Only need to consider new debt. Existing debt interest expense is already incorporated in Street EPS estimates

77

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\96

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

The Mini-Merger Model


Step 3C: Income Statement Adjustments Pro Forma Shares Outstanding

If the acquiror uses equity to fund the transaction, the denominator of the EPS calculation must
include the new shares outstanding
Calculate the new shares issued by the acquiror by dividing the amount of equity consideration
used in the transaction by the acquirors share price
Acquiror price per share = $85/share
Total Equity Consideration = $200MM
Share Issued

= Equity Consideration/Acquiror price per share


= $200MM/$85
= 2.4MM Shares

Pro forma Shares = Existing Shares + New Shares (63.0MM + 2.4MM = 65.4MM
Shares)

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

78

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\97

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

The Mini-Merger Model


Example Summary Calculation

Results

EPS
Calculation

299

299

32

25.00

400

=
=

200 debt
200 stock

Equity Purchase Price-Target Book Value


400 - 200 = 200
50% * Excess Purchase Price
.5 * 200 = 100
50% * Excess Purchase Price
.5 * 200 = 100
Identifiable Intangible Assets / Amortization Period
100 / 20

(5)

Debt * Interest rate * (1-tax rate)


200 * 8% * (1 - .40)

(10)

-10 Interest Expense


316 Adjusted Income

65.4

65.4 Pro Forma Shares

=
=

4.83

4.83 Pro Forma EPS


4.75 Standalone EPS

1.68%

Step

Calculation

Acquiror Net Income

Earnings per share * fully diluted shares outstanding


4.75 * 63.0
Fiscal year adjusted earnings per share * fully diluted shares outstanding
(1.73 * 3/12) + (2.13 * 9/12) * 16.0

Target Net Income

Price Per Share


Total Purchase Price
Form of Consideration

Accounting Adjustments
Excess Purchase Price
Goodwill
Identifiable Intangible Assets
Amortization of Intangibles

Tax-Affected Interest Expense ($)

Pro Forma Shares Outstanding


Pro Forma EPS
Standalone EPS
Accretion/(Dilution)

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

Target Stock price * (1 + Premium) = Price per Share


20.00 * (1+ 0.25) = 25.00
Price per Share * Fully diluted shares
$25.00 * 16.0
Purchase Price * Percentage of each consideration
400 * 50% cash/debt
400 * 50% stock

Acquirors Shares + (Equity consideration / Acquirors share price)


63.0 + (200 / $85.00)
Pro Forma Net Income / Pro Forma Net Shares
(316 / 65.4)
4.75
(Pro Forma EPS / Standalone EPS -1) * 100
(4.83 / 4.75 -1) * 100

+32
331 Combined Income

-5 Amortization Expense

1.68% Accretion

79

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\98

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

The Mini-Merger Model


Breakeven Synergies Analysis

If a transaction is dilutive, it can be rationalized by the synergies that would be created by the
merger of the two companies
Breakeven synergies refers to the minimum amount of pre-tax income synergies needed for
the transaction to be non-dilutive
Both revenue and cost saving synergies exist, but mini-merger analyses generally focus on cost
synergies (the amount of money saved by eliminating overlap between companies)
In this mini-merger scenario, the result was accretive. However, if it had not been, the
following steps would have determined the breakeven synergies
Assume pro forma EPS had come out to $4.60/share

Step

Calculation

Addl EPS Required To Break Even

Standalone EPS Pro Forma EPS


$4.75 - $4.60

Addl After-Tax Net Income Required to Break Even

$9.81MM

Additional After-Tax Net Income / (1-Tax Rate)


$9.81MM / (1 - .40)

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

$.15

Addl EPS * Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding


$.15 * 65.4

Pre-Tax Synergies Required to Break Even

Result

$16.4MM

80

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\99

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

The Mini-Merger Approach


Static Analysis Summary

The mini-merger approach is a static analysis that is based on a number of simplifying


assumptions. Nevertheless, the results provided by the mini merger are a good guideline for
an initial analysis
Features of the approach
For any given price/premium and form of consideration, the Mini-Merger Approach
allows the determination of accretion/dilution and break-even synergies
Adjusts for incremental depreciation, amortization, financing costs and dividend policy
Provides key pro forma credit statistics
Principal assumptions
Acquisition debt will remain outstanding for the entire period; i.e., no dynamic debt
paydown with cash generated by the combined entity
Model uses EPS estimates and some constant measure of shares outstanding to determine
the standalone net income numbers for acquiror and target; therefore, analysis is
incremental in nature
Profits and interest on refinanced debt of the Target will continue to be taxed at the
prevailing tax rate of the Target company (again, incremental analysis)
All intangible assets are amortized over the same useful life

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

81

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\100

Project Training

Tab H

Value Creation Analysis

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\101

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

Multiple / Value Creation Analysis


Introduction

The reason that analysts focus on accretion and dilution is that stocks often trade off multiples
such as P/E
In other words, all things being equal, if earnings change and a stock trades off a P/E
multiple, the price of the stock should increase or decrease by the same percentage
These analyses can be performed on other multiples such as EBITDA or EBIT, but P/E is
the most common
Factors that influence what P/E multiple a stock trades at include projected earnings growth,
perceived risk, and general industry outlook
Based on these factors, the market may assign a different P/E to a merged company than it did
to the acquiror
The Value Creation Analysis attempts to capture the overall value impact of a potential
transaction to shareholders. While accretion/dilution analysis focuses solely on EPS impact,
the Value Creation Analysis also incorporates the P/E implications of a transaction (i.e.,
multiple expansion or contraction)
Impact of a transaction on the value for any given shareholder:
The Value Creation Analysis assumes that the share price is driven by P/E multiples
Using P/E valuation, share prices are impacted by:
changes in EPS (calculated in the Merger Analysis)
changes in P/E, also known as multiple expansion/contraction (qualitative assessment
of market reaction to the transaction)
It is therefore possible that a transaction which is dilutive to EPS can be accretive or
additive from a total value standpoint
MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

82

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\102

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

Value Creation Analysis


Introduction

The Value Creation Analysis attempts to capture the overall value impact of a potential
transaction to shareholders. While accretion/dilution analysis focuses solely on EPS impact,
the Value Creation Analysis also incorporates the P/E implications of a transaction (i.e.,
multiple expansion or contraction)
Impact of a transaction on the value for any given shareholder:
The Value Creation Analysis assumes that the share price is driven by P/E multiples
Using P/E valuation, share prices are impacted by:
changes in EPS (calculated in the Merger Analysis)
changes in P/E, also known as multiple expansion/contraction (qualitative assessment
of market reaction to the transaction)
It is therefore possible that a transaction which is dilutive to EPS can be accretive or
additive from a total value standpoint

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

83

NYIBDF13\162526\A2\11 JUL 2001\6:53 AM\103

Project Training

Merger Accounting/Analysis

Value Creation Analysis


Example

There exists a breakeven


P/E multiple from a value
standpoint (to Target
shareholder)

Step 1: EPS Accretion/Dilution


Analysis

Although the transaction


looks dilutive to Target,
multiple expansion could
still make the deal
attractive to Target
shareholders

Pro Forma Net Income ($)


Pro Forma Shares

Once an exchange ratio is


fixed, in a stock merger the
split of value between
the two companies
shareholders cannot be
changed

Step 2: P/E Impact


We assume the new Company will trade between the standalone P/E multiples
PF
Value to
Market Acquiror 93%
Value
of PF MV
$
$

Value to
Target 7% of
PF MV
$

316

PF Net
P/E Multiple Income
$
x

PF
Price
$

65.4

12

316

57.96

3,791

3,525

265

Pro Forma EPS ($)

4.83

13

316

62.79

4,106

3,819

287

Accretion/Dilution to Acquiror (%)

1.68

14

316

67.62

4,422

4,113

310

Accretion/Dilution to Acquiror

Accretion/Dilution to Target

15

316

72.45

4,738

4,407

332

16

316

77.28

5,054

4,700

354

Pro Forma Net Income ($)

316

17

316

82.11

5,370

4,994

376

Target Share of PF Net Income

22.1

Multiple

18

316

86.94

5,686

5,288

398 Value

Expansion

19

316

91.77

6,002

5,582

420 Creation

20

316

96.60

6,318

5,875

442

% Ownership

# Shares of Target

16

PF EPS for Target ($)

1.38

Accretion/(Dilution) to Target (%)

Pro Forma EPS for Target


can also be obtained by
multiplying Pro Forma EPS
times the exchange ratio

(32.0)

EPS
$

# of
Shares

Net
Income
$

Market
Price
$

Market
Value
$

P/E
x

Acquisition
Price
$

Acquisition
P/E
x

Acquisition
Value
$MM

Exchange
Ratio

Ownership
%

Acquiror

4.75

63

299

85

5,355

17.9

5,355

93

Target

2.03

16

32

20

320

9.9

25

12.3

400

0.29

5,755

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER

84

Anda mungkin juga menyukai