Permanent Attachments
1
Voter Name
(Vote)
David Flight
DOW CHEMICAL
Proposal:
Ballot ID:
1632
Clause No./
Subclause
No./Annex
(e.g. 3.1)
Type of
Comment
Comment Resolution
Proposed
Change
Editorial
5.8.1.2
Technical
(Affirmative)
Tad Broad
Fisher Tank
Company
(Negative)
David Meaux
5.8.1.2
Technical
Fisher Tank
Company
(Negative)
David Meaux
5.8.1.2.a
Technical
Permanent Attachments
1
Voter Name
(Vote)
Ballot ID:
1632
Clause No./
Subclause
No./Annex
(e.g. 3.1)
Type of
Comment
Comment Resolution
following statement:
Fisher Tank
Company
(Negative)
David Meaux
Proposal:
5.8.1.2.a
Editorial
7.2.3.5
Technical
Fisher Tank
Company
(Negative)
David Meaux
Fisher Tank
Company
(Negative)
page 2 of 11
API electronic balloting template/version April 2003
Permanent Attachments
1
Voter Name
(Vote)
Proposal:
Ballot ID:
1632
Clause No./
Subclause
No./Annex
(e.g. 3.1)
Type of
Comment
Comment Resolution
Para.
7.2.3.5
Editorial
5.8.1.2
Technical
5.8.1.2.a
Technical
(Affirmative)
Jimmy Schroeder
Innovative Tank
Solutions, LLC
(Negative)
Jimmy Schroeder
Innovative Tank
Solutions, LLC
(Negative)
page 3 of 11
API electronic balloting template/version April 2003
Permanent Attachments
1
Voter Name
(Vote)
Proposal:
Ballot ID:
1632
Clause No./
Subclause
No./Annex
(e.g. 3.1)
Type of
Comment
Comment Resolution
7,2,3,5
Technical
Entire
Section
Technical
Innovative Tank
Solutions, LLC
(Negative)
Doug Bayles
Inserv Integrated
Service Company
LLC
(Negative)
Also, the testing requirements for temporary or
permanent attachments will increase the cost of tanks
that can be erected with Group I, II or III materials and
not neccesarily improve the quality of the finished tank.
Earl Crochet
Editorial
Kinder Morgan
Terminals
(Affirmative)
Remove the comma from after the word "procedure".
Laurence Foster
8.5.1.2
Editorial
Permanent Attachments
1
Voter Name
(Vote)
Proposal:
Ballot ID:
1632
Clause No./
Subclause
No./Annex
(e.g. 3.1)
Type of
Comment
Comment Resolution
Marathon Oil
Company LLC
(Negative)
Laurence Foster
5.8.1.2.a
Technical
7.2.3.5
Technical
5.8.1.2
Technical
7.2.3.5
Technical
As stated the attachments shall be made using lowhydrogen electrodes only. This would lead one to
believe that only stick (shielded metal arc welding or
SMAW)is allowed for such attachments. I believe that
both hard wire (gas metal arc welding or GMAW) and
flux cored wire (flux core arc welding or FCAW) are
used extensively in field welds and should be included
here.
5.8.1.2.a
Editorial
a)
Permanent
attachments may be welded
directly to the shell with fillet
welds having a maximum leg
dimension of 13 mm (1/2 in.). If
a permanent plate is intended to
provide external reinforcement of
Marathon Oil
Company LLC
(Negative)
Laurence Foster
Marathon Oil
Company LLC
(Negative)
Kenneth Erdmann
Matrix Service
Company
(Negative)
James McBride
Petrex, Inc.
(Affirmative)
John Lieb
Tank Industry
Consultants, Inc.
(Negative)
page 5 of 11
API electronic balloting template/version April 2003
Permanent Attachments
1
Voter Name
(Vote)
Proposal:
Ballot ID:
1632
Clause No./
Subclause
No./Annex
(e.g. 3.1)
Type of
Comment
Comment Resolution
Permanent Attachments
1
Voter Name
(Vote)
John Lieb
Proposal:
Ballot ID:
1632
Clause No./
Subclause
No./Annex
(e.g. 3.1)
Type of
Comment
Comment Resolution
5.8.1.2.a
Editorial
Tank Industry
Consultants, Inc.
(Negative)
a)
Permanent
attachments may be welded
directly to the shell with fillet
welds having a maximum leg
dimension of 13 mm (1/2 in.). If
a permanent plate is intended to
provide external reinforcement of
the tank shell, the minimum
external plate width or length
dimension shall be 12 inches.
The external plate may be
circular, oblong, square, or
rectangular in shape. Square or
rectangular plates shall have a
minimum radius of 2 inches on all
four corners, except for corners
of a plate that abuts the tank
bottom plate, top angle or a shell
stiffener. The plate shall be
rolled to the outside tank radius.
In addition, the external
permanent plate thickness shall
be the lesser of or the shell
course thickness. The edge of
any permanent attachment weld
shall be at least 75 mm (3 in.)
from the horizontal joint of the
shell and at least 150 mm (6 in.)
from the vertical joint, insert-plate
joints, or reinforcing-plate fillet
welds. Permanent attachment
welds may cross shell horizontal
or vertical butt welds, providing
the welds are continuous within
these limits and the angle of
incidence between the two welds
is greater than or equal to 45
degrees. Additionally, any splice
weld in the permanent
page 7 of 11
Permanent Attachments
1
Voter Name
(Vote)
Proposal:
Ballot ID:
1632
Clause No./
Subclause
No./Annex
(e.g. 3.1)
Type of
Comment
Comment Resolution
5.8.1.2
Editorial
change
TGB Partnership
(Affirmative)
to
5.8.1.2.a
Editorial
Technical
(Affirmative)
David
Rosenkrantz
Access
Engineering, LLC
page 8 of 11
API electronic balloting template/version April 2003
Permanent Attachments
1
Voter Name
(Vote)
Proposal:
Ballot ID:
1632
Clause No./
Subclause
No./Annex
(e.g. 3.1)
Type of
Comment
Comment Resolution
requirements?
(YetToVote)
Technical
Technical
Negative comments:
Negative comments:
1.
In the background section, the wording
doesnt make sense. Current proposal wording:
Currently API 650 does not address and also
include the possibility of underbead cracking on
Groups IV, IVA, V and VI materials.
1.
Steven Adolphsen
CBI Services
(NonVoter)
Suggested wording:
2.
API has NDE rules that limit the size of the
underbead. What is the justification for making API
more stringent (Has there been significant increase in
cracking in Groups I,II AND III?
Suggested wording:
Currently API 650 does not
address and also include the
possibility of underbead cracking
on Groups (CHANGE IV, IVA, V
and VI to read ) I, II , AND III
materials.
Affirmative comment:
1.
In purpose section,
page 9 of 11
Permanent Attachments
1
Voter Name
(Vote)
Proposal:
Ballot ID:
1632
Clause No./
Subclause
No./Annex
(e.g. 3.1)
Type of
Comment
Comment Resolution
Affirmative comment:
1.
In purpose section, change code to read
Standard.
Larry Hiner
General
Technical
General
Technical
Affirmative - As an extension to this agenda item Weld spacing criteria for Appendix S tanks
attachments should be the same as for basic group I
thru IIIA materials. If the attachment weld spacing for
group I thru IIIA materials is added, Appendix S in API
650, 620, and 653 should be comparable.
General
Technical
Affirmative - As an extension to this agenda item attachment weld spacing criteria for Appendix X tanks
attachments should be the same as for basic group IV
thru VIA materials.
5.8.1.2.a
Technical
(NonVoter)
Larry Hiner
page 10 of 11
API electronic balloting template/version April 2003
Permanent Attachments
1
Voter Name
(Vote)
Proposal:
Ballot ID:
1632
Clause No./
Subclause
No./Annex
(e.g. 3.1)
Type of
Comment
Comment Resolution
(Negative)
Douglas Miller
5.8.1.2.a
Technical
7.2.3.5
Technical
page 11 of 11
API electronic balloting template/version April 2003