ANNUAL REPORT
TO THE PUBLIC
“. . . caring and working together to create excellence in a dynamic educational process for the global citizen.”
1
Table of Contents
Letter from Superintendent Reiter!....................................................................... Page 3
School Board!..........................................................................................................Page 4
Contact Information!................................................................................................Page 4
MACSD Mission Statement!....................................................................................Page 4
Certified Enrollment and Certified Staff!..................................................................Page 5
Highly Qualified Teachers!.......................................................................................Page 5
Student Demographics!...........................................................................................Page 6
Attendance Rate!....................................................................................................Page 6
Graduation Rate!.....................................................................................................Page 6
Introduction to Student Performance Data!.............................................................Page 7
Standards in Reading, Math and Science!..............................................................Page 8
Testing Participation Rates!.....................................................................................Page 8
Annual Measurable Objectives!..............................................................................Page 9
Reading Performance!...................................................................................Pages 10-14
Math Performance!.........................................................................................Pages 15-19
Science Performance!....................................................................................Pages 20-24
Cohort Performance in Reading, Math and Science!............................................Page 25
ACT and Post-Secondary Results!........................................................................Page 26
Additional State Requirements!.............................................................................Page 27
Progress with Early Intervention Goals!................................................................Page 27
Athletic Eligibility!..................................................................................................Page 28
Multiple Assessment Results in Reading, Math and Science!........................Pages 28-29
2
Mount Ayr Community School District
2008-09 Annual Report to the Public
District Patron,
Sincerely,
Russell Reiter
Superintendent of Schools
3
Russ Reiter, Superintendent
! Phone 641-464-0500
Board of Education
Rod Shields, President, P.J. West, Larry Giles,
Jim Uhlenkamp, Duane Schafer
4
Mount Ayr Community School District Demographics
Fall 2003 - Fall 2008
Total Served Enrollment K-12* and
Full Time Equivalent Teachers,
Fall 2003 to Fall 2008
*Total served enrollment includes open enrollment in and tuition in students. Numbers
include voluntary preschool for the fall of 2007 (26 students) and fall of 2008 (20 students).
450
225
66 67 66 67 64 65
0
Fall 2003 Fall 2004 Fall 2005 Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008
5
Percent of Students Percent of Students Attendance Rate
with Individual Who Are Free-Reduced PreK-12
Education Plans Lunch School-Wide, 2008-2009
(IEP!s) Compared to PreK-12
Students Without IEP!s 2008-2009
School-Wide, PreK-12
2008-2009 Absence
3%
IEP
15%
Free/Reduced
40%
Not Free/Reduced
Not IEP 60% Attendance
85% 97%
50.00
25.00
6
Introduction to Student Performance Data
! As part of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) passed by Congress in 2001, schools are
required to provide to patrons an annual report of student performance in grades 3-8 and 11 and
progress toward goals set by the state. Contained in this report are indicators of student
achievement and other information that relates to student success in Mount Ayr Community
School District. We continually strive to implement school improvements which lead to the
success of all students. Examining the data contained in this report will enable our patrons to
view current trends, gaps and areas of strength and concern as we approach the daunting goal
of proficiency for 100 percent of our students by the school year 2013-2014.
! Data for grades 3 through 8 and grade 11 are contained in this report. The state
of Iowa uses the Iowa Test of Basic Skills (grades 3-8) and the Iowa Test of
Education Development (grade 11) as a measure of whether or not students are
meeting a level of performance considered to be proficient in the areas of Reading,
Math and Science.
Low Socioeconomic
100% 100%
Status
8
Annual Measurable Objectives
(AMO)* and Mount Ayr Community
Performance
*Set by the state, AMO is the annual target for the percentage of students whose test
scores must be proficient (scoring 41st national percentile or above) in reading and
mathematics. Meeting the AMO is the first step toward demonstrating adequate yearly
progress under the federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) law. The goal is for all students to
be proficient by the 2013-2014 school year.
AMO
(2008-2009) 74.10% 76% 76.40% 69.70% 71.50% 73.30% 79.30%
MATH
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11
AMO
(2008-2009) 73.90% 74.70% 76.60% 72.80% 72% 72% 79.30%
Mount Ayr Community School does not have enough population in other subgroups, such as students
with disabilities, English language learners, or ethnic groups, to disaggregate that data.
9
Reading Goal for 2008-2009
Our reading goals reflect the state of Iowa"s trajectory for No Child Left
Behind which progresses toward 100 percent proficiency by 2014.
Goal Actual
100
87
75 80 82
76 72 72
50
25
0
Grades 3-5 Grades 6- 8 Grade 11
GRADE 3 GRADE 4
46 students: Interme 37 students: Interme
25 male, Proficient High Low 19 male, Proficient High Low
diate diate
21 female 18 female
All Students 80.4 26.1 54.3 19.6 All Students 97.2 62.1 35.1 2.7
Male 80 24 56 20 Male 94.7 52.6 42.1 5.3
Female 81 28.6 52.4 19.1 Female 100 72.2 27.8 0
Low SES* 70 10 60 30 Low SES* 100 63.2 36.9 0
Not Low SES* 88.5 38.5 50 11.5 Not Low SES* 94.4 61.1 33.3 5.6
GRADE 5 GRADE 6
39 students: Interme 43 students: Interme
24 male, Proficient High Low 22 male, Proficient High Low
diate diate
15 female 21 female
All Students 84.5 33.3 51.2 15.4 All Students 72 11.6 60.4 27.9
Male 83.3 33.3 50 16.7 Male 81.8 18.2 63.6 18.1
Female 86.6 33.3 53.3 13.4 Female 62 4.8 57.2 38.1
Low SES* 71.4 28.6 42.8 28.6 Low SES* 55 0 55 45
Not Low SES* 92 36 56 8 Not Low SES* 86.9 21.7 65.2 13
Grade 7 Grade 8
50 students: Interme 42 students: Interme
36 male, Proficient High Low 17 male, Proficient High Low
diate diate
14 female 25 female
All Students 72 18 54 28 All Students 71.4 9.5 61.9 28.6
Male 69.4 16.7 52.8 30.6 Male 64.7 5.9 58.8 35.3
Female 78.6 21.4 57.1 21.4 Female 76 12 64 24
Low SES* 56.5 8.7 47.8 43.4 Low SES* 46.2 0 46.2 53.8
Not Low SES* 85.1 26 59.2 14.9 Not Low SES* 82.8 13.8 69 17.2
GRADE 11
44 students: Interme
29 male, Proficient High Low
diate
22 female
All Students 81.8 9.1 72.7 18.2
Male 85 15 70 15
Female 79.2 4.2 75 20.8
Low SES* 66.7 0 66.7 33.3
Not Low SES* 89.7 13.8 75.9 10.3
*Socioeconomic status
11
Reading Performance by Grade Level*
2004-2005 to 2008-2009
Percent of Students Proficient
*Different students each year. Compares this year’s class to
earlier years’ classes of the same grade.
Grade 3 Grade 4
100 100
89 92 97
75
81 85 80 75 89 90
77 81
50 50
25 25
0 0
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09
Grade 5 Grade 6
100 100
75 85 75
83 77 83 80 74 73 71 72
50 50 61
25 25
0 0
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09
Grade 7 Grade 8
100 100
75 75
74 73 76 72 74 73 71
50 50 63 67
57
25 25
0 0
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09
Grade 11
100
75 86
78 80 79 82
50
25
0
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09
12
Mount Ayr’s Reading Proficiency Compared to the
State of Iowa and Green Valley AEA,
2006-2007 to 2008-2009
State of Iowa Green Valley AEA Mount Ayr
Grade 3 Grade 4
100 100
97
92 90
75 85 75
80 82
76 75 81 75 77 76 79 80 80 76 77 77
50 50
25 25
0 0
06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09
Grade 5 Grade 6
100 100
80 80 85
75 75
79 75 83 76 75 80
68 65 73 69 70 71 69 66 72
50 50
25 25
0 0
06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09
Grade 7 Grade 8
100 100
75 75
71 72 76 70 66 72 71 72 73 70 73 71 71 67 73 72 71
50 57 50
25 25
0 0
06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09
Grade 11
100
75 86 82
76 77 79 77 79 76 76
50
25
0
06-07 07-08 08-09
13
Reading Performance by Subgroups
School-Wide Grades 3-11,
2004-2005 to 2008-2009
Female/Male Comparison
Female Male
100
81 81 81 81
78
75
75 75 77
69 70
50
25
0
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09
75
65 66 66
63 62
50
25
0
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09
14
Math Goal for 2008-2009
Our math goals reflect the state of Iowa"s trajectory for No Child Left
Behind which progresses toward 100 percent proficiency by 2014.
Goal Actual
100
92
75 83 80
76 73 73
50
25
0
Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grade 11
15
Math Performance by Achievement Level
2008-2009
Percent of Students Proficient
For purposes of NCLB, the achievement of Iowa students is described in National Percentile Rank
(NPR) score ranges as Low, Intermediate,and High. Students with NPRs of 1-40 are in the Low level,
those with NPRs from 41 through 89 are in the Intermediate level, and those with values from 90 to 99
are in the High level. In Iowa, the Low level as defined above is “Less-than-Proficient” and the
Intermediate and High levels together are regarded as “Proficient”.
GRADE 3 GRADE 4
46 students: Proficient Interme 37 students: Proficient Interme
High Low High Low
25 male, diate 19 male, diate
21 female 18 female
All Students 89.1 21.8 67.4 10.9 All Students 100 67.5 32.4 0
Male 88 16 72 12 Male 100 63.1 36.8 0
Female 90.5 28.5 61.9 9.5 Female 100 72.2 27.8 0
Low SES* 85 10 75 15 Low SES* 100 68.5 31.6 0
Not Low SES* 92.3 30.8 61.5 7.7 Not Low SES* 100 66.7 33.4 0
GRADE 5 GRADE 6
39 students: Proficient Interme 43 students: Proficient Interme
High Low High Low
24 male, diate 22 male, diate
15 female 21 female
All Students 87.2 33.3 53.8 12.8 All Students 76.7 23.3 53.5 23.3
Male 87.5 33.3 54.1 12.5 Male 86.4 36.3 50 13.6
Female 86.7 33.3 53.3 13.3 Female 66.7 9.6 57.1 33.3
Low SES* 78.6 14.2 64.3 21.4 Low SES* 65 5 60 35
Not Low SES* 92 44 48 8 Not Low SES* 87 39.1 47.8 13
Grade 7 GRADE 8
50 students: Proficient Interme 42 students: Proficient Interme
High Low High Low
36 male, diate 17 male, diate
14 female 25 female
All Students 90 30 60 10 All Students 81 21 60 19.1
Male 88.9 27.8 61.1 11.1 Male 76.5 11.8 64.7 23.5
Female 92.9 35.7 57.1 7.1 Female 84 28 56 16
Low SES* 82.6 17.4 65.2 17.4 Low SES* 76.9 7.7 69.2 23.1
Not Low SES* 96.3 40.7 55.6 3.7 Not Low SES* 82.8 27.6 55.2 17.2
GRADE 11
44 students: Proficient Interme
High Low
20 male, diate
24 female
All Students 72.7 16 57 27.3
Male 80 25 55 20
Female 66.7 8.3 58.3 33.3
Low SES* 53.3 6.6 46.7 46.7
Not Low SES* 82.8 20.7 62.1 17.2
* Socioeconomic status
16
Math Performance by Grade Level*
2004-2005 to 2008-2009
Percent of Students Proficient
*Different students each year. Compares this year’s class to
earlier years’ classes of the same grade.
Grade 3 Grade 4
100 100
100 95 100
75 92 87 86 91 89 75 89 89
50 50
25 25
0 0
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09
Grade 5 Grade 6
100 100
75 89 91 89 87 75 90
80 76 79 82 77
50 50
25 25
0 0
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09
Grade 7 Grade 8
100 100
75 86 90 75
81 83 81 81
72 69 72 67
50 50
25 25
0 0
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09
Grade 11
100
75 85
76 77 77 73
50
25
0
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09
17
Mount Ayr’s Math Proficiency Compared to the
State of Iowa and Green Valley AEA,
2006-2007 to 2008-2009
State of Iowa Green Valley AEA Mount Ayr
Grade 3 Grade 4
100 100
95 100
86 91 89 89
75 75
77 76 75 74 76 78 81 80 79 78 80 81
50 50
25 25
0 0
06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09
Grade 5 Grade 6
100 100
91 89 87 90
75 75 82
79 77 79 77 79 78 76 75 74 70 77
74 70
50 50
25 25
0 0
06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09
Grade 7 Grade 8
100 100
75 90 75
77 77 81 83 81
76 72 78 78 75 76 74 76 76 73 81
69
50 50
25 25
0 0
06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09
Grade 11
100
75
78 74 77 77 76 77 77 74 73
50
25
0
06-07 07-08 08-09
18
Math Performance by Subgroups School-Wide
Grades 3-11, 2004-2005 to 2008-2009
Percent of Students Proficient
Female/Male Comparison
Female Male
100
85 86 83 83
83
75 85
80 82
78
74
50
25
0
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09
75
76 74 76
71 69
50
25
0
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09
19
Science Goal for 2008-2009
To increase to 84.2 the percentage of proficient students in grades
3-11 in the area of science as measured by the Iowa Test of Basic
Skills/Iowa Test of Educational Development total math score.
Goal Actual
100
75 84.2 86.4
50
25
0
Grades 3-11
20
Science Performance by Achievement Level 2008-2009
Percent of Students Proficient
For purposes of NCLB, the achievement of Iowa students is described in National
Percentile Rank score ranges as Low, Intermediate,and High. Students with NPRs of
1-40 are in the Low level, those with NPRs from 41 through 89 are in the Intermediate
level, and those with values from 90 to 99 are in the High level. In Iowa, the Low level
as defined above is “Less-than-Proficient” and the Intermediate and High levels
together are regarded as “Proficient”.
GRADE 3 GRADE 4
34 students: Proficient Interme 39 students: Proficient Interme
High Low High Low
17 male, diate 24 male, diate
17 female 15 female
All Students 89.2 19.6 69.6 10.9 All Students 100 45.9 54.1 0
Male 88 24 64 12 Male 100 42.1 57.9 0
Female 90.5 14.3 76.2 9.5 Female 100 50 50 0
Low SES* 90 30 60 10 Low SES 100 42.1 57.9 0
Not Low SES* 88.4 11.5 76.9 11.5 Not Low SES 100 50 50 0
GRADE 5 GRADE 6
44 students: Proficient Interme 49 students: Proficient Interme
High Low High Low
22 male, diate 33 male, diate
22 female 16 female
All Students 84.6 33.3 51.3 15.4 All Students 74.4 20.9 53.5 25.6
Male 83.3 33.3 50 16.7 Male 90.9 31.8 59.1 9.1
Female 88.6 33.3 53.3 13.3 Female 57.1 9.5 47.6 42.9
Low SES 71.4 14.3 57.1 28.6 Low SES 90 10 45 45
Not Low SES 92 44 48 8 Not Low SES 91.3 30.4 60.9 8.7
Grade 7 GRADE 8
42 students: Proficient Interme 42 students: Proficient Interme
High Low High Low
17 male, diate 19 male, 23 diate
25 female female
All Students 88 30 58 12 All Students 85.7 14.3 71.4 14.3
Male 88.9 30.6 58.3 11.1 Male 82.4 5.9 76.5 17.6
Female 85.7 28.6 57.1 14.3 Female 88 20 68 12
Low SES 82.6 21.7 60.9 17.4 Low SES 76.9 15.4 61.5 23.1
Not Low SES 92.6 37 55.6 7.4 Not Low SES 89.7 13.8 75.9 10.3
*Socioeconomic status
GRADE 11
51 students: Proficient Interme
High Low
29 male, diate
22 female
All Students 84.1 18.2 65.9 15.9
Male 47.1 11.8 35.3 52.9
Female 70.8 12.5 58.3 29.2
Low SES 44.5 5.6 38.9 55.6
Not Low SES 73.9 17.4 56.5 26.1
21
Science Performance by Grade Level*
2004-2005 to 2007-2008
Percent of Students Proficient
*Different students each year. Compares this year’s class to earlier years’
classes of the same grade.
Grade 3 Grade 4
100 100
94 98 100
75 89 75 92
81 81 85
50 50
25 25
0 0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09
Grade 5 Grade 6
100 100
75
93 75 92
84 84 85 83 78 74
50 50
25 25
0 0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09
Grade 7 Grade 8
100 100
75 90 88 75 86 86
74 69 70 71
50 50
25 25
0 0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09
Grade 11
100
75 90 85 84
78
50
25
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09
22
Mount Ayr’s Science Proficiency Compared to the
State of Iowa and Green Valley AEA,
2006-2007 to 2008-2009
25 25
0 0
06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09
25 25
0 0
06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09
88
75 81 82 80 81 82 85 75 82 84 86 79 83 83 84 86
74 71
69
50 50
25 25
0 0
06-07 07-08 08-09 06-07 07-08 08-09
100 Grade 11
75 80 80 85 80 80 78 80 79 84
50
25
0
06-07 07-08 08-09
23
Science Performance by Subgroups School-Wide
Grades 3-11, 2004-2005 to 2008-2009
Percent of Students Proficient
Female/Male Comparison
Female Male
100
85 86 85
83 82
75 84 85
78 80 80
50
25
0
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09
75
75 73 75
71 70
50
25
0
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09
24
Cohort* Proficiencies in
Reading, Math and Science
*Cohort comparisons follow the same class or group of students through
the grades from one year to the next.
80 80
70 70
60 60
50 50
Gr 2 Gr 3 Gr 4 Gr 3 Gr 4 Gr 5
90 90
80 80
70 70
60 60
50 50
Gr 3 Gr 4 Gr 5 Gr 6 Gr 3 Gr 4 Gr 5 Gr 6 Gr 7
90 90
80 80
70 70
60 60
50 50
Gr 4 Gr 5 Gr 6 Gr 7 Gr 8 Gr 5 Gr 6 Gr 7 Gr 8 Gr 9
90
80
70
60
50
Gr 6 Gr 7 Gr 8 Gr 9 Gr 10
25
ACT Results, Core Completion and
Probable Post-Secondary Success
29% 30%
71% 70%
26
Additional State Requirements
Little Raider Preschool is offered for and will continue to work with writing this
children turning 4 by Sept. 15. An early year.
childhood special education program is also This school year, our professional
offered. 3 old students attend half days. 4- development will focus on the Iowa Core
year old students attend early childhood Curriculum, formative assessment and
special education a half-day and Little Raider research-based instructional strategies. The
preschool the rest of the day. Iowa Core Curriculum is mandated by the
Parents are given the option of sending state. Formative assessment allows
their children (turning five by Sept. 15) who teachers to check each day to determine if
have late spring or summer birthdays to students have learned the new skill or
Junior Kindergarten where the curriculum is concept. If students have not learned the
more readiness in nature. skill, then the teacher will re-teach it. Extra
Reading comprehension and vocabulary skill practice may be provided by the
have been our professional development classroom teacher, Title 1 teacher, or both.
focus the past few years. Whole group At the high school level, we use the ACT
reading instruction as well as guided reading scores that we receive each year as well as
instruction is provided daily. With guided the primary indicators used in Second
reading, students are placed into groups Chance Reading. In SCR we monitor the
based on their skill level. Students learn the number of books read and reviewed with the
same skills as their classmates but reading teacher, reading fluency rates as measured
material at the students" instructional level is by Jamestown Reading Checks, grade level
used. Because reading and writing go hand equivalency scores as measured by both the
in hand, teachers learned about and IA Tests and the Stanford Diagnostic
implemented the 6+1 writing traits last year Reading Test. The SDRT is given pre and
post in the Fall and in the Spring.
27
Athletic Eligibility
The faculty and administration of Mount Ayr 3. A list of all ineligible students will be given
Community Middle & High School have to each teacher as soon as the list is
developed the following eligibility policy for completed on Monday. Each teacher needs
the school: to inform students whose names have been
1. At the beginning of the school year, each placed on the Borderline or Ineligible lists in
teacher is to distribute to each student in their class. It is also up to the teacher in
their class the criteria that they will use for charge of an activity to inform the student or
placing students on the borderline/ineligible students in their activity if they are borderline
list. Each teacher is to post the or ineligible in a class..
criteria.! 4. The list is confidential and will not be
2. The B/I list is a weekly reporting system posted or made public.
based on a cumulative grade. A student may Students are not to be placed on the
be placed on the B/I list for the following: borderline list for discipline reasons.
Borderline 5. A student who is on the Ineligible list at
A. D, D-, or F cumulative grade point the end of each semester will remain on the
average and/or list for three weeks. If they raise their grade
B. incomplete work (reasonable judgment by by the end of the 3 weeks, they can then be
teacher in conjunction with criteria removed from the ineligible list. Students
established) rendered ineligible under this policy are not
Ineligible - (after having been on the permitted to represent Mount Ayr Community
borderline list for one week) Schools in any public performance. Being on
A. F cumulative grade point average and/or the Ineligible list does not prohibit the student
B. incomplete work (reasonable judgment by from practicing with the team.
the teacher in conjunction with criteria
established)
Multiple Assessments
The No Child Left Behind Law and Iowa"s Assessment Modules (ICAM) to serve this
Department of Education require Mount Ayr purpose in the areas of reading and math.
Community School District to report multiple The State Collaborative on Assessments and
assessment data for reading and math in Student Standards (SCASS) is used as a
grades 4, 8 and 11 and science in grade 8. second assessment for science.
MACS uses the Iowa Collaborative
SCASS
Students’ average score out of 33 possible points (9 elementary questions,
19 intermediate questions, 5 difficult questions).
30.0
Green Valley AEA Mount Ayr 8th Grade
21.7 21.9
22.5
2008 2009
Reading - Understanding Functional Text
Grade 4 Grade 8 Grade 11
100 100 100
73
75 65 70 75 63 75 66
53
50 50 50
24 30
20 16 15 14 18 19 21
25 25 12 25 8 13
0 0 0
Low Intermediate High Low Intermediate High Low Intermediate High
75 64 65 75 68 75 63
46 50
50 50 34 50 33
26
18 19 18 16 20 17 15 17
25 25 25 11
0 0 0
Low Intermediate High Low Intermediate High Low Intermediate High