0.
Isham*
PREFACK
This i s
The
The f i r s t s e c t i o n i s a s h o r t
i n t r o d u c t i o n which emphasises t h e d u a l p a r t i c l e / f i e l d i n t e r p r e t a t i o n
c o n v e n t i o n a l quantum f i e l d t h e o r y .
of
The l a t t e r i n t e r p r e t a t i o n i s used
e x t e n s i v e l y i n quantum g r a v i t y a n d , because o f i t s r e l a t i v e
unfamiliarity,
The n e x t
two s e c t i o n s d e a l w i t h t h e problem o f d e f i n i n g a q u a n t i s e d f i e l d on an
u n q u a n t i s e d g r a v i t a t i o n a l background.
There h a s r e c e n t l y been
c o n s i d e r a b l e i n v e s t i g a t i o n on t h i s t o p i c (which i s a p r e l i m i n a r y
to
The f o u r t h s e c t i o n i s concerned w i t h c o v a r i a n t
q u a n t i s a t i o n ( s e e t h e c h a p t e r by M. D u f f ) w h i l e in t h e n e x t two s e c t i o n s
c a n o n i c a l q u a n t i s a t i o n i s d i s c u s s e d in some t e c h n i c a l d e t a i l s i n c e t h i s
was n o t t h e s u b j e c t o f any o t h e r s p e c i f i c l e c t u r e a t t h e c o n f e r e n c e .
The f i n a l s e c t i o n c o n s i d e r s t h e c u r r e n t l y p o p u l a r quantum model/quantum
cosmology approach t o q u a n t i s i n g t h e g r a v i t a t i o n a l f i e l d ,
although
M.MacCollum) t h e t r e a t m e n t h e r e i s concerned w i t h t h e g e n e r a l i d e a s
r a t h e r than with s p e c i f i c
1.
details.
INTRODUCTION
The problem o f q u a n t i s i n g t h e g r a v i t a t i o n a l f i e l d h a s e x e r c i s e d
t h e minds o f a number o f p e o p l e o v e r t h e l a s t f o r t y y e a r s and w i l l
d o u b t l e s s c o n t i n u e t o do so f o r t h e n e x t f o r t y ' 1
^.
The
d e r i v e from a number of d i f f e r e n t s o u r c e s .
General
greatest
T h i s i s in i t s e l f
sufficient
t o g u a r a n t e e a c o n t i n u e d i n t e r e s t i n t h e problem o f u n i f y i n g then.;
i n t e r e s t which i s h e i g h t e n e d by c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h e very s p e c i a l
p l a y e d by g e n e r a l r e l a t i v i t y w i t h i n t h e framework of c l a s s i c a l
non-quantum) p h y s i c s .
an
role
(viz.
In any c o n v e n t i o n a l f i e l d t h e o r y t h e s p a c e - t i m e
s t r u c t u r e i s f i x e d and t h e f i e l d p r o p a g a t e s i n t i m e on t h i s background.
In g e n e r a l r e l a t i v i t y however t h e k i n e m a t i c a l and dynamical a s p e c t s of
t h e t h e o r y a r e t i g h t l y i n t e r l a c e d t h r o u g h t h e medium o f t h e
gravitational
f i e l d , w h i c h , on t h e one h a n d , s p e c i f i e s t h e g e o m e t r i c a l p r o p e r t i e s of
s p a c e - t i m e , and on t h e o t h e r f u l f i l l s t h e c l a s s i c a l t a s k of a f i e l d by
propagating a physical force.
C o n v e n t i o n a l quantum t h e o r y , however, i s
f o r m u l a t e d on a r i g i d l y f i x e d s p a c e - t i m e b a c k g r o u n d ,
Euclidean t h r e e -
From t h i s
relativity
problem:!.
The m a t h e m a t i c a l s t r u c t u r e o f t h e
The p r i m o r d i a l
concept i s t h a t of a p o i n t s e t whose m a t h e m a t i c a l p o i n t s a r e t o be
r e l a t e d i n some way w i t h p h y s i c a l s p a c e - t i m e e v e n t s .
This s e t is then
is
c o n s t r u c t e d on t h i s m a n i f o l d i n such a way as t o s a t i s f y t h e E i n s t e i n
equations.
these l e v e l s .
t h e e a s i e s t r o u t e and f i x e s e v e r y t h i n g but t h e m e t r i c .
Thus a
(Actually
if
c a n o n i c a l q u a n t i s a t i o n i s b e i n g used t h e n t h e r e l e v a n t m a n i f o l d may be
t h r e e , r a t h e r than f o u r , dimensional). This i s c l e a r l y the a t t i t u d e
to
q u a n t i s a t i o n which i s c l o s e s t t o t h a t p r e v a l e n t in c o n v e n t i o n a l quantum
field theories,
l i g h t c o n e s t r u c t u r e i n t h e s e t h e o r i e s i t i s c l e a r t h a t a l r e a d y a major
d i f f e r e n c e has emerged - t h e l i g h t c o n e s t r u c t u r e of g e n e r a l
relativity
Two of t h e
t h e t o p o l o g i c a l as v e i l as t h e m e t r i c s t r u c t u r e of s p a c e - t i m e a n d , w i t h
h i s r e c e n t t h o u g h t s on t h e r o l e played by formal l o g i c i n quantum
g r a v i t y , has t a k e n t h e q u a n t i s a t i o n l e v e l r i g h t back t o t h e b a s i c
e l e m e n t s of m a t h e m a t i c s .
S i m i l a r l y Penrose has f r e q u e n t l y a r g u e d t h a t
s p a c e - t i m e i t s e l f , r a t h e r t h a n j u s t t h e m e t r i c f i e l d , s h o u l d be
i n t i m a t e l y l i n k e d w i t h quantum t h e o r y .
p a r t l y m o t i v a t e d h i s c o m b i n a t o r i a l s p i n network t h e o r y
(8)
h i s r e c e n t work on t w i s t o r s
(7)
a s w e l l as
Most p e o p l e would a g r e e t h a t a d e e p e r
i t i s a l s o i m p o r t a n t t o u n d e r s t a n d how f a r c o n v e n t i o n a l
i t i s e s s e n t i a l t o d i s t i n g u i s h c a r e f u l l y between t h o s e
Hand in g l o v e w i t h t h i s must go an
a p p r e c i a t i o n of t h e p r a c t i c a l a p p l i c a t i o n s o f t h i s t y p e o f q u a n t i s a t i o n
and t h e i r i m p l i c a t i o n s
f o r r e a l i s t i c physical systems.
In t h i s
article
field
have e v o l v e d s i n c e t h e s u b j e c t was f i r s t c o n s i d e r e d in t h e e a r l y
These t e n d t o be c l a s s i f i e d u n d e r two h e a d i n g s , ' c o v a r i a n t '
'canonical'
(5, 56).
1930's.
('<) and
These t i t l e s c a n , from a t e c h n i c a l s t a n d p o i n t ,
be
a l i t t l e m i s l e a d i n g b u t s i n c e t h e y a r e widely used t h e y w i l l be r e t a i n e d
here.
C a n o n i c a l q u a n t i s a t i o n i t s e l f w i l l be s p l i t up i n t o
'true'
c a n o n i c a l q u a n t i s a t i o n (5) and s u p e r s p a c e - b a s e d q u a n t i s a t i o n
(6).
T h i s h e l i c i t y two, m a s s l e s s p a r t i c l e i s t h e n t h o u g h t of
conventional
nonrenormalisable.
quantisation
particle-
There
i s i n f a c t an i m p o r t a n t a l t e r n a t i v e p h y s i c a l i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of what i s
e s s e n t i a l l y t h e same m a t h e m a t i c s , even i n t h e c a s e of an o r d i n a r y
s p a c e quantum f i e l d t h e o r y .
flat-
i t i s worth d i s c u s s i n g i t h e r e ,
at l e a s t in a h e u r i s t i c
For t h e sake of s i m p l i c i t y c o n s i d e r a f r e e n e u t r a l s c a l a r
$(x) i n o r d i n a r y f l a t Minkowski s p a c e - t i m e .
field
The c o n v e n t i o n a l
q u a n t i s a t i o n of t h i s s y s t e m u s i n g Fock s p a c e , with t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g
p a r t i c l e i n t e r p r e t a t i o n , i s w e l l known ( s e e 2 f o r more d e t a i l s ) .
On
relations
= i K 6(3)(x - i)
[(x),
(1.1)
two-particle
t h i s s i m p l e problem of q u a n t i s i n g a f r e e f i e l d l o o k s from t h e v i e w p o i n t
of c o n v e n t i o n a l quantum m e c h a n i c s .
I f a c l a s s i c a l s y s t e m has a
E u c l i d e a n c o n f i g u r a t i o n space Q w i t h g l o b a l c a r t e s i a n c o o r d i n a t e s
c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o n d e g r e e s of f r e e d o m ,
q^.-.q^
t h e n t h e b a s i c problem of quantum
t h e o r y ( i n t h e S c h r c d i n g e r p i c t u r e ) i s t o f i n d a r e p r e s e n t a t i o n of t h e
c a n o n i c a l commutation
relations
[q. , .] = i K 6. .
[q.
x,4-l...a
= 0
(1.2)
[Pi P j ] = o
w i t h s e l f - a d j o i n t o p e r a t o r s on a H i l b e r t space of s t a t e s .
Then t h e
dynamical e q u a t i o n
H (
W - a n
; P,.P2-"Pn)
*t = i " J T
must be s o l v e d f o r t h e t i m e e v o l u t i o n o f t h e s t a t e v e c t o r ^
of t h e q u a n t i s e d Hamiltonian o p e r a t o r H.
(1
"3)
i n terms
By v i r t u e o f t h e Stone-Von Neumann t h e o r e m ,
t h e unique
solution
the
s e t o f a l l complex v a l u e d f u n c t i o n s of Q which a r e s q u a r e i n t e g r a b l e w i t h
r e s p e c t t o t h e Lebesgue measure d q j d q ? . . . d q ^ .
The o p e r a t o r s q . , P j a r e
t h e n r e p r e s e n t e d by
(4.
(q^.-qj =
^ . . . q j
(1.1)
j
and any o t h e r r e p r e s e n t a t i o n of eqn ( 1 . 2 ) ( o r more p r e c i s e l y o f
e x p o n e n t i a t e d Weyl form) i s u n i t a r i l y e q u i v a l e n t t o t h i s o n e .
the
The wave
f u n c t i o n h a s t h e i n t e r p r e t a t i o n t h a t i f B i s any B o r e l s e t i n R.n t h e n
PB = j
l^q^.-qjl*
'B
dq1...dqn
(1.6)
i s t h e p r o b a b i l i t y t h a t i f t h e s y s t e m i s i n t h e s t a t e ty and a
measurement i s made on t h e s y s t e m o f t h e v a l u e s o f q . . . q^ ( i . e . o f t h e
c l a s s i c a l c o n f i g u r a t i o n o f t h e s y s t e m ) t h e n t h e y l i e i n B.
classical
Now a
f i e l d t h e o r y can b e r e g a r d e d as a c l a s s i c a l m e c h a n i c a l
w i t h i n f i n i t e l y many d e g r e e s o f f r e e d o m .
b a s i s s e t o f f u n c t i o n s on / f t 3 ,
system
E s s e n t i a l l y , an o r t h o n o r m a l
{ e ^ ( j c ) } s a y , i s chosen ( t y p i c a l l y w i t h
p r o p e r t i e s i n r e l a t i o n t o t h e H a m i l t o n i a n which s i m p l i f y t h e d y n a m i c a l
e v o l u t i o n p r o b l e m ) and t h e f i e l d s a r e expanded as
<>(x,t) =
I
i=l
q (t) e,(x)
1
(1.7)
oo
Tt(x,t) =
in which ( q j . . ;
I p^t)
i=l
e.(x)
(1.8)
P J . P , . . . ) c o r r e s p o n d t o t h e i n f i n i t e number of modes
o r d e g r e e s of freedom o f t h e system.
Thus t h e commutation r e l a t i o n s i n
ranging
I f one were t o c o n t i n u e t o f o l l o w t h e s t a n d a r d p r o c e d u r e
of i n f i n i t e l y many v a r i a b l e s ( b u t n e v e r t h e l e s s s t i l l f u n c t i o n s on t h e
c l a s s i c a l c o n f i g u r a t i o n s p a c e ) and t h e t i m e e v o l u t i o n e q u a t i o n
(1.3)
would be c o r r e s p o n d i n g l y an i n f i n i t e o r d e r p a r t i a l d i f f e r e n t i a l e q u a t i o n .
K q u i v a l e n t l y an obvious r e p r e s e n t a t i o n of eqn ( l . l ) i s o b t a i n e d by
c h o o s i n g s t a t e v e c t o r s as f u n c t i o n a l s o f t h e c l a s s i c a l
configuration
(1.10)
[()]
(1.11)
with t h e S c h r o d i n g e r e q u a t i o n now r e a d i n g :
HU, - i S
) vfr(-);tj = i K U
OCht] .
(1.12)
t h e n i f a measurement i s made of t h e
classical
(1.13)
i s t h e p r o b a b i l i t y t h a t t h e r e s u l t w i l l l i e in t h e ( i n f i n i t e
s e t B.
dimensional)
This i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f t h e s t a t e v e c t o r i s c l e a r l y d i f f e r e n t from
(The two i n t e r p r e t a t i o n s
a r e p a r t i a l l y l i n k e d through t h e t h e o r y o f c o h e r e n t s t a t e s ) .
I t must be
For a s t a r t i t i s n o t c l e a r e x a c t l y what
t h e c l a s s i c a l c o n f i g u r a t i o n space Q s h o u l d b e .
3
f u n c t i o n s on UL ,
all C
stands
Should i t be a l l C
f u n c t i o n s on IK with compact s u p p o r t . . .
Hot u n r e l a t e d t o t h i s i s t h e f a c t t h a t
also
(9)(10)
distributions!
f u r t h e r on t h i s t o p i c e x c e p t t o r e - e m p h a s i s e t h a t m a t h e m a t i c a l Fock
space admits of two complementary p h y s i c a l i n t e r p r e t a t i o n s :
the usual
10
Indeed
I ^ C s ^ f * )J I 2
as t h e a p p r o p r i a t e p r o b a b i l i t y
( t h i s i s a c t u a l l y n o t q u i t e c o r r e c t , s e e 5U.55).
density
t h e n t h e b e h a v i o u r of
t h e s t a t e f u n c t i o n a l i n t h e v i c i n i t y o f m e t r i c s which
classically
c o r r e s p o n d t o s i n g u l a r i t i e s would have a d i r e c t b e a r i n g on t h e
c o l l a p s e o r o t h e r w i s e o f t h e quantum s y s t e m .
gravitationa
Also of c o u r s e t h e n o t i o n of
f i e l d i s a n o t h e r good reason f o r l o o k i n g c h a r i t a b l y a t
interpretations.
gravitational
non-particle
context.
inter-
Which
i n t e r p r e t a t i o n i s r e l e v a n t t o any given s i t u a t i o n i s d e t e r m i n e d b a s i c a l l y
by what o b s e r v a b l e s a r e b e i n g measured.
quantum g r a v i t y i s s l i g h t l y d i f f e r e n t .
However, t h e s i t u a t i o n
In t h e c o v a r i o n t
in
approaches
However, b e c a u s e t h e
gravitational
system i s gauge i n v a r i a n t ( i . e . c o o r d i n a t e i n v a r i a n t ) n o t a l l
components
11
of t h e m e t r i c t e n s o r a r e genuine c a n o n i c a l v a r i a b l e s and b e c a u s e o f
t h i n t h e c o v a r i a n t q u a n t i s a t i o n of a l l t e n components o f t h e m e t r i c
t e n o o r ( c f . G u p t a - B l e u l e r in quantum e l e c t r o d y n a m i c s ) l e a d s t o a
p a r t i c l e p i c t u r e which i s s l i g h t l y d i f f e r e n t from t h e one above.
o t h e r hand i n t h e ' t r u e '
On t h e
i n t e r p r e t a t i o n s could be r e a s o n a b l y e x p e c t e d t o e x i s t (assuming t h a t
the
In t h e
c a n o n i c a l q u a n t i s a t i o n scheme (6) t h e f i e l d p i c t u r e
c e r t a i n l y dominant.
Indeed s u p e r s p a c e i t s e l f i s a t y p e o f
is
gravitational
S u p e r s p a c e c o n t a i n s a d d i t i o n a l d e g r e e s o f freedom o v e r
clear.
F i n a l l y l e t us n o t e t h a t even a t t h i s s t r a i g h t f o r w a r d l e v e l of
metric quantisation
only,
The Copenhagen i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f
11
'
(and
One famous
i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of
a s t e p which i s o b v i o u s l y n e c e s s a r y i f
the
system i s t h e u n i v e r s e !
I t has become u n f a s h i o n a b l e t h e s e days f o r much n o t i c e t o be t a k e n
of t h e s e c o n c e p t u a l p r o b l e m s , most p e o p l e p r e f e r r i n g t o work on t h e more
'respectable' technical difficulties.
However, i n quantum g r a v i t y t h e
is
the
latter.
2.
3 ( ( - d e t g ) J g UU
d e r i v e d from t h e l a g r a n g i a n
L(x) = | ( g , 1 V ( x ) 3
) - m 2 * ( - d e t g)> = 0
(2.1)
density
( * ) 3 y * ( x ) - m2 $ 2 ( x ) ) ( - d e t g ) * .
(2.2)
The q u a n t i s a t i o n of t h i s s c a l a r f i e l d c o n s t i t u t e s a t h e o r y w h i c h , from
t h e quantum g r a v i t y p o i n t o f view, i s d e f i c i e n t i n t h e f o l l o w i n g two
13
ronpect3.
i)
The q u a n t i s a t i o n of t h e m e t r i c t e n s o r i t s e l f i s
completely
negle c t e d .
ii)
Even i f t h e m e t r i c were u n q u a n t i s e d t h e r e s h o u l d be a
r e a c t i o n back on i t v i a E i n s t e i n ' s e q u a t i o n s ,
e f f e c t s in $
from quantum
(such as p a r t i c l e p r o d u c t i o n by a time v a r y i n g
From a p r a c t i c a l
s t a n d p o i n t t h e r e a r e v a r i o u s s i t u a t i o n s in a s t r o p h y s i c s and
u n i v e r s e ' cosmology i n which t h e r o l e of an u n q u a n t i s e d
'early
gravitational
f i e l d p r o d u c i n g r e a l p a r t i c l e s would be of g r e a t i m p o r t a n c e .
From a
I t i s t h e r e f o r e perhaps s u r p r i s i n g t h a t ,
whereas u
twenty
only a r e l a t i v e l y s m a l l
(12)(13>
amount of work has appeared d e a l i n g with t h i s s i m p l i f i e d problem.
The f i r s t q u e s t i o n t o ask i s w h a t , from a p h y s i c a l p o i n t of view,
t h e l a g r u n g i a n i n eqn ( 2 . 1 ) could be e x p e c t e d t o d e s c r i b e ?
s p a c e c a s e , in which t h e m e t r i c t e n s o r
Minkowski t e n s o r 1
In t h e
flut
i s simply t h e c o n s t a n t
t h e answer i s w e l l known.
Indeed t h e t h e o r y
d e g e n e r a t e s i n t o a f r e e massive s c a l a r f i e l d ( i n t h e c o n v e n t i o n a l s e n s e )
w i t h t h e two m a j o r i n t e r p r e t a t i o n s - f i e l d and p a r t i c l e - which were
o u t l i n e d i n 51.
I t i s r e a s o n a b l e t o suppose t h a t f o r f i e l d s g
do n o t ' d e v i a t e t o o v i o l e n t l y '
w i l l again be p o s s i b l e .
which
interpretations
In p a r t i c u l a r from t h e p a r t i c l e p o i n t o f view i t
It
** "
extreme c a r e needs t o be e x e r c i s e d in c o n v e r t i n g t h i s
s t a t e m e n t i n t o an unambiguous p i e c e of t h e o r y .
uv
w i l l be
electromagnetic
1J
'
However,
plausible-sounding
The p a r t i c l e
inter-
The s t e p s l e a d i n g t o ,
and a s s o c i a t e d w i t h , t h i s i n t e r p r e t a t i o n a r e b r i e f l y :
1)
C o n s t r u c t t h e momentum n ( x , t ) which i s
c o n j u g a t e t o $ ( x , t ) i n t h i s frame and p o s t u l a t e t h a t t h e
resulting
quantum f i e l d s s a t i s f y t h e e q u a l t i m e CCR
[(x,t), (i,t)J
= i K a(3)
(x - jr.)
(2.3)
for
$(x,t):
' ( x , t ) - (V2 - m 2 ) ( x . t ) = 0
(N.B.
(2.It)
x and t i n o r d e r t o c o r r e s p o n d t o genuine o p e r a t o r s .
Thus e q u a t i o n
(which i m p l i e s s m e a r i n g in o n l y ) would be m e a n i n g l e s s .
However, f o r
t h e f r e e f i e l d , and i t i s e x p e c t e d a l s o f o r t h e f i e l d on t h e f i x e d
background, t h e procedure i s j u s t i f i e d . )
(2.3)
15
time
t = 0 s a y ) by s e l l ' - a d j o i n t o p e r a t o r s ( a f t e r s u i t a b l e smearing) on a
H i l b e r t s p a c e in which t h e H a m i l t o n i a n i s a genuine s e l f - a d j o i n t
o p e r a t o r which g e n e r a t e s time e v o l u t i o n i n t h e s e n s e t h a t
i / j j Ht
- i / f i Ht
$(x,t) = e
$(x,0) e
(2.5)
i / K Ht
- i / j . Ht
n(2,t) = e
n(j,0) e
The s t a n d a r d p r o c e d u r e i s t o s e p a r a t e t h e s o l u t i o n s t o t h e o p e r a t o r
e q u a t i o n (2.It) in t h e form (fi = l )
f
x,t) =
du( j )
[e
- i EJ. t
iE . t .
b ( j ) 4,.(x) + e J b T ( j ) ^ . ( x ) ]
J
J
(2.6)
, of t h e s e l f - a d j o i n t o p e r a t o r (-V2 + m2 ) ,
t h e completeness
which s a t i s f y
relations
j d p ( j ) *"(x)
( 3 )
(x-x)
(2.7)
and
j d3x ^ ( x )
^(x) = 6(i,j),
(2.8)
where
J dp(i) 6 ( i , j )
A t y n i c a l c h o i c e would be
F(j) =
F(i)
(2.9)
16
(2i,)
( i , j ) = 6 ( 3 ) ( k - k'>
d p ( i ) = d3k
(2.10)
In
I"
[ a . , a^J
(x_) w i t h o p e r a t o r c o e f f i c i e n t s .
to
= el'
5 ( j , k )\
(2.11)
where
a . = >e7 b .
0
J O
(2.12)
is
a..
0
i^.(x).
0
In so f a r as t h e s e q u a n t a con be i d e n t i f i e d as
17
p h y s i c a l p a r t i c l e s t h i s i s t h e s t a g e a t which t h e p a r t i c l e
concept f i r s t a p p e a r s .
In p a r t i c u l a r t h e c y c l i c s t a t e mentioned
state,
H i s shown t o be a w e l l - d e f i n e d o p e r a t o r on Fock s p a c e , a f t e r
normal o r d e r i n g , w i t h t h e p r o p e r t y of
i)
a n n i h i l a t i n g t h e vacuum s t a t e ( i n t h e S c h r o d i n g e r
p i c t u r e t h i s means t h a t t h e vacuum s t a t e does not
change w i t h t i m e i . e . t h e r e i s no p a r t i c l e
production).
ii)
commuting w i t h t h e 'number' o p e r a t o r s H . ,
J
t h e r e f o r e c o n s t a n t s o f t h e motion.
which a r e
In p a r t i c u l a r an
n - p a r t i c l e s t a t e always e v o l v e s i n t h e S c h r o d i n g e r
p i c t u r e i n t o an n - p a r t i c l e s t a t e ( a g a i n no p a r t i c l e
production or
annihilation).
r e l a t e d by a P o i n c a r group a c t i o n t h e q u e s t i o n i s r e a l l y now t h e
P o i n c a r group a c t s on t h e o r i g i n a l Fock s p a c e .
The c r e a t i o n o p e r a t o r s t r a n s f o r m c o v a r i a n t l y
t h e m s e l v e s as do t h e a n n i h i l a t i o n
ooerators.
anorigst
30
ii)
In f a c t
t h e time t r a n s l a t i o n group g e n e r a t o r i s p r e c i s e l y t h e
Hamiltonian c o n s i d e r e d a l r e a d y , i . e . , t i m e
t r a n s l a t i o n i s time e v o l u t i o n ,
and
iii)
any n - p a r t i c l e s t a t e i s mapped i n t o a n o t h e r
n-particle
s t a t e by t h e group.
These t h r e e p r o p e r t i e s (which a r e c l o s e l y l i n k e d ) imply i n e f f e c t t h a t
t h e n o t i o n of p a r t i c l e o r q u a n t a i s e s s e n t i a l l y i n d e p e n d e n t o f
o b s e r v e r and t h a t t h e n - p a r t i c l e s t a t e s behave t h e same,
P o i n c a r e group i s c o n c e r n e d ,
p a r t i c l e quantum t h e o r y .
inertial
as f a r as t h e
as t h e y do in t h e u s u a l r e l a t i v i s t i c
At t h i s s t a g e in t h e c o n v e n t i o n a l
n-
textbook
t r e a t m e n t o f quantum f i e l d t h e o r y i t i s t a c i t l y assumed t h a t t h e p u r e l y
mathematical 'quanta'
d i s c u s s e d so f a r c o r r e s p o n d t o r e a l
physical
T h i s c o n n e c t i o n between m a t h e m a t i c s and p h y s i c s
i s one o f t h e v i t a l s t e p 3 in t h e p h y s i c a l i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f a q u a n t i s e d
f i e l d but i s frequently glossed over.
The i n v e s t i g a t i o n of t h i s
c o n n e c t i o n t u r n s o u t t o be o f paramount importance in t h e c a s e of an
a r b i t r a r y background.
S i n c e t h e u l t i m a t e aim i s t o q u a n t i s e t h e s c a l a r f i e l d i n eqn ( 2 . 2 )
t h e next o b v i o u s s t e p i s t o couple an e x t e r n a l s o u r c e t o t h e f r e e
scalar f i e l d j u s t considered.
L(x)
= |
(n WU
The a p p r o p r i a t e l a g r a n g i a n
4>(x) 3 v * ( x ) - m V ( x ) )
+ j ( x ) <>2(x)
is
(2.13)
19
h e r e j ( x ) d e s c r i b e s t h e e x t e r n a l u n q u a n t i s e d s o u r c e w h i c h , by
v i r t u e ol' t h e form of i t s i n t e r a c t i o n , might be e x p e c t e d t o produce
p a i r s o f ijr-mesons.
I f t h i 3 t e c h n i c a l s t e p can be performed t h e n t h i s
term can c e r t a i n l y l e a d t o t h e p r o d u c t i o n of p a i r s of
original type.
interaction
'particles'
of t h e
the f u l l Hamiltonian).
I t i s , however, q u i t e p o s s i b l e t h a t t h e
This s i t u a t i o n might be r e c o g n i s e d h e u r i s t i c a l l y by t h e p r o d u c t i o n
in time o f on i n f i n i t e number of q u a n t a .
p i c t u r e i s n o t very a p p r o p r i a t e ;
In t h i s c a s e t h e S c h r o d i n g e r
however, a H e i s e n b e r g - t y p e p i c t u r e
might s t i l l e x i s t b u t w i t h t h e dynamical e v o l u t i o n b e i n g d e s c r i b e d by a
n o n - u n i t a r i l y implementable automorphism of t h e o p e r a t o r o b s e r v a b l c s
r a t h e r t h a n by eqns
(2.5).
The whole
problem o f r e n o r m a l i s a t i o n and t h e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n of p h y s i c a l
observable3
r e a r s i t s head a t t h i s s t a g e .
As an extreme example,
i f j ( x ) were a
U
constant - ^
chosen i n i t i a l l y b u t t h e s i t u a t i o n f o r g e n e r a l s o u r c e s i s
considerably
physical
2 0
interpretation is non-trivinl.
In f a c t t h e r e i s no u n i v e r s a l l y
agreed p a r t i c l e i n t e r p r e t a t i o n
One major
c o n t r i b u t o r y f a c t o r i s t h a t in g e n e r a l t h e t h e o r y i s no l o n g e r
under t h e P o i n c a r e group.
invariant
T h i s o f c o u r s e i s a f e a t u r e s h a r e d by t h e
s c a l a r f i e l d d e f i n e d on an a r b i t r a r y background ( w h i c h ,
generically,
Certain
Numerous d i f f i c u l t i e s can be
yv
(x) = n
yv
+ h
yv
sketched
One n a t u r a l approach p e r h a p s i s
yv
and w r i t e
(x)
(2.114)
The
In
p a r t i c u l a r t h e e x i s t e n c e o f t h e f l a t background w i t h i t s P o i n c a r e group
of motions and p r e f e r r e d c l a s s of i n e r t i a l r e f e r e n c e f r a m e s should l e n d
t o t h e same s o r t o f p a r t i c l e i n t e r p r e t a t i o n .
of o b j e c t i o n s t o t h i s p o i n t of view.
i)
However, t h e r e a r e a number
For example:
21
Minkownkian in e i t h e r i t s t o p o l o g i c a l
or
m e t r i c a l p r o p e r t i e s , i n which case t h e s e p a r a t i o n
in eqn ( 2 . l U ) (with i t s c o r r e s p o n d i n g s e p a r a t i o n
o f t h e H a m i l t o n i a n i n t o f r e e and i n t e r a c t i o n
i s completely
ii)
terms)
inappropriate,
For example
then t h i s
is
not e q u i v a l e n t t o m i c r o c a u s a l i t y w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e
f i c t i t i o u s Minkowski background.
Thus i t i s very d e s i r a b l e t o avoid any f i e l d s e p a r a t i o n
and,
c o r r e s p o n d i n g l y , t o c o n s i d e r t h e l a g r a n g i a n in eqn ( 2 . 1 ) as a s i n g l e
entity.
t h e o r y t h i s p o s e s a number o f problems.
F i r s t l y t h e r e i s now, in
In p a r t i c u l a r t h e r e a r e no p r e f e r r e d c l a s s e s of
There i s no
notions
of p a r t i c l e .
operator
In g e n e r a l any p u r e a n n i h i l a t i o n ( o r c r e a t i o n )
2?
w i l l e v o l v e i n time i n t o a m i x t u r e o f such o p e r a t o r s , a s i n d e e d i t
does f o r t h e s i m p l e e x t e r n a l s o u r c e c a s e in eqn ( 2 . 1 3 ) .
This i s not
in i t s e l f s u r p r i s i n g as i t c o r r e s p o n d s t o t h e e x p e c t e d phenomenon of
particle production,
b u t t h e problem o f d e c i d i n g i n what s e n s e t h e
particles
Another d i f f i c u l t y i s t h a t t h e H a m i l t o n i a n h a s t o be
Two d i f f e r e n t c h o i c e s can e a s i l y l e a d t o
constant.
-particles
b u t i t c o u l d a l s o simply be t h e r e s u l t of c h o o s i n g a p h y s i c a l l y
i n a p p r o p r i a t e CCR r e p r e s e n t a t i o n ,
i n which c a s e t h e i n f i n i t e answer
renormalisable
u l t r a v i o l e t d i v e r g e n c e s o f some c o n v e n t i o n a l quantum f i e l d t h e o r i e s .
If the metric is s t a t i c or stationary,
s o t h a t t h e r e e x i s t s sort
g l o b a l t i m e l i k e K i l l i n g v e c t o r w i t h i t s a s s o c i a t e d group o f
some p r o g r e s s can be made.
symmetries,
asymptotically
and
f i e l d s can be u s e d t o g i v e some s o r t of p r e f e r r e d p a r t i c l e
i n t e r p r e t a t i o n , w i t h a c o r r e s p o n d i n g s e t of p h y s i c a l o b s e r v a b l e s
i n c l u d e in p a r t i c u l a r , e n e r g y ) . '
15
'
(which
I t i s tempting to speculate t h a t
i t may be in t h e r o l e o f c o n s o l i d a t i n g t h e concept o f a p a r t i c l e
that
Even i n t h e s e s i t u a t i o n s however, a
f o r d e t a i l s of t h e s e .
I t i s p e r f e c t l y p o s s i b l e t h a t the production of
p a r t i c l c o by a g r a v i t a t i o n a l
f i e l d c o u l d p r o v i d e a fundamental
17
This
is
' which a r e
He c o n s i d e r s an a s y m p t o t i c a l l y
flat
(Note t h a t
This i s n o t a c o m p l e t e r e s u l t in t h e p h y s i c a l s e n s e
because i t i g n o r e s t h e r e a c t i o n back o f t h e p a r t i c l e s on t h e
f i e l d a n d , as might be e x p e c t e d from t h e remarks a b o v e ,
gravitational
the precise
approach.
....
tliL
of t h e problems which a r i s e in t h e p a r t i c l e i n t e r p r e t a t i o n w i l l r e a p p e a r
in d i f f e r e n t g u i s e s .
At a d e e p e r l e v e l i t i s p o s s i b l e t h a t "-the t)ieory
rather
e x t e r n a l s o u r c e coupled t o a s c a l a r f i e l d can be u s e f u l l y t r e a t e d i n t h i s
way.
In s o f a r as a m a n i f o l d l o c a l l y r e s e m b l e s Minkowski-space (by v i r t u e
o f i t s very d e f i n i t i o n ) ,
t h e i d e a o f c o n c e n t r a t i n g on l o c a l
observables
i s an a t t r a c t i v e one.
Of c o u r s e one can always t a k e r e f u g e i n t h e a s s e r t i o n t h a t t h e
problem stems b a s i c a l l y from n o t q u a n t i s i n g t h e m e t r i c t e n s o r f i e l d and
can only be r e s o l v e d by a f u l l quantum g r a v i t y t h e o r y .
It is difficult
(17)
, Unruh
(18)
and Ford
(19)
3.
challenge.
In o t h e r words t h e
reaction
back on t h e g r a v i t a t i o n a l f i e l d caused by t h e p r o d u c t i o n o f s c a l a r
p a r t i c l e s i s i n c o r p o r a t e d as p a r t o f t h e dynamics.
To a c h i e v e t h i s
it
The
.Je) = T
(3.1)
( m a t t e r , g)
In not s u i t a b l e as i t s t a n d s s i n c e i t e q u a t e s an o p e r a t o r and a
(-number.
The obvious m o d i f i c a t i o n i s t o w r i t e
G y v ( g ) = <T yv ( m a t t e r , g)>
where <
(3.2)
-v.,
^ ^
nuitable
state.
(20)
The s i t u a t i o n i s c l e a r l y a t l e a s t as c o m p l i c a t e d as
t h a t d i s c u s s e d i n 2 b u t w i t h t h e a d d i t i o n a l f e a t u r e t h a t t h e g r a v i t a t i o n a l
f i e l d i s now i n t r o d u c e d as a dynamical v a r i a b l e r a t h e r t h a n as a f i x e d
background.
The obvious q u e s t i o n which a r i s e s i s what p r e c i s e l y i s meant by
a 'suitable state'?
> t o c o r r e s p o n d t o a mixed,
s t a t i s t i c a l ( p r o b a b l y n o n - e q u i l i b r i u m ) s t a t e of t h e s y s t e m .
This,
Clearly
approach
I t s h o u l d be emphasised t h a t t h e d i f f i c u l t i e s c o n c e r n i n g c h o i c e o f
a n n i h i l a t i o n and c r e a t i o n o p e r a t o r s , normal o r d e r i n g e t c ,
d i s c u s s e d in 52 s t i l l apply h e r e .
which were
In p a r t i c u l a r t h e normal o r d e r i n g o f
t h e energy momentum t e n s o r w i l l e v i d e n t l y p l a y a m a j o r r o l e in t h e
c o r r e c t use of eqn ( 3 . 2 ) .
N o t i c e t h a t t h e a d d i t i o n of a c o n s t a n t t o
gravitational
Thus t h e fundamental f e a t u r e o f g e n e r a l r e l a t i v i t y , t h a t t h e
a b s o l u t e r a t h e r t h a n r e l a t i v e v a l u e o f t h e energy-momentum t e n s o r has a
meaning, i s s h a r p l y r e f l e c t e d in t h i s quantum t h e o r y .
T h i s p r o v i d e s an
t h i s approach a r e p r o b a b l y t h o s e of L. P a r k e r and S. F u l l i n g .
They
ds2 = d t 2 - R ( t ) 2
I
i,j=l
S.. ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) d x i d x j
(3-3)
1J
where S . (x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) i s t h e ( f i x e d ) m e t r i c o f a t h r e e - s p h e r e .
E v i d e n t l y a very s p e c i a l c h o i c e of s t a t e
made t o r e n d e r t h i s system o f e q u a t i o n s s e l f c o n s i s t e n t .
A general
state
The r e s u l t of t h e i r c a l c u l a t i o n s i s an e x p l i c i t form
f o r t h e f u n c t i o n R ( t ) which p o s s e s s e s t h e r e m a r k a b l e f e a t u r e t h a t t h e
27
I f t h e s c a l a r f i e l d d e s c r i b e d say p i o n s ,
it
cms r a t h e r t h a n t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c Planck l e n g t h
of pure quantum g r a v i t y .
The 10
-13
v 10
cms
.
.
cms r e s u l t i m p l i e s of c o u r s e t h a t
the
f i n e d e t a i l s of t h e b e h a v i o u r o f t h e system a t t h e t u r n - a r o u n d p o i n t
depend s i g n i f i c a n t l y on t h e s t r o n g i n t e r a c t i o n s .
However t h e t h o u g h t -
p r o v o k i n g p o s s i b i l i t y remains t h a t i t may n o t be n e c e s s a r y t o q u a n t i s e
t h e g r a v i t a t i o n a l f i e l d i t s e l f i n o r d e r t o avoid g r a v i t a t i o n a l
collapse.
In e f f e c t t h e v i o l a t i o n of t h e Hawking-Penrose energy c o n d i t i o n s by t h e
e x p e c t a t i o n v a l u e of t h e q u a n t i s e d m a t t e r ' s momentum t e n s o r may be
sufficient.
There a r e many t e c h n i c a l problems remaining in t h e P a r k e r - F u l l i n g
work ( a s t h e a u t h o r s t h e m s e l v e s p o i n t o u t ) c o n c e r n i n g t h e c h o i c e of t h e
3tate
>
and
t h e r e n o r m a l i s a t i o n of t h e t h e o r y , which a r e ,
t o
some e x t e n t ,
connected w i t h t h o s e of t h e s i m p l e r t y p e of system d i s c u s s e d in 2.
However, from a p r a c t i c a l ( a s t r o p h y s i c a l ) p o i n t o f view t h i s approach t o
'quantum g r a v i t y '
of a f a i r l y s u b s t a n t i a l r e s e a r c h e f f o r t i n t h e f u t u r e .
so
It.
COVARIANT QUANTISATION
We new t u r n o u r a t t e n t i o n t o t h e problem of q u a n t i s i n g t h e
gravitational field i t s e l f .
H i s t o r i c a l l y t h e various approaches t o t h i s
or ' c o v a r i a n t '
i s t h e l a t t e r approach which i s c o n s i d e r e d i n t h i s s e c t i o n .
and i t
Two s l i g h t l y
Both
of them s t a r t by f i x i n g in advance t h e f o u r - d i m e n s i o n a l s p a c e - t i m e
m a n i f o l d upon which t h e m e t r i c t e n s o r g
an o p e r a t o r - v a l u e d d i s t r i b u t i o n .
i s r e g a r d e d as b e i n g d e f i n e d as
The o p e r a t o r i s s e p a r a t e d i n t o a
g p v = 6Uv
+ J UV
(fc.l)
which i s t h e n i n s e r t e d i n t o t h e E i n s t e i n a c t i o n S = j
(assuming f o r s i m p l i c i t y t h a t no m a t t e r f i e l d s a r e p r e s e n t ) .
t h a t a l l t e n components of
The f a c t
(as
as opposed t o ,
say,
In t h e p i o n e e r i n g work o f
(2 8}
De W i t t
f u n c t i o n s by v a r y i n g t h e a c t i o n w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e background
field.
(The e x t e r n a l s o u r c e s of S c h w i n g e r ' s o r i g i n a l t h e o r y a r e d i f f i c u l t t o
use when a n o n - a b e l i a n group i s p r e s e n t . )
29
The key
I r c l i n i c a l t o o l i n t h i s i s t h e P e i e r l s - P o i s 3 o n b r a c k e t which e n a b l e s a
m l u t i o n t o be s e t up between t h e quantum commutator o f o b s e r v a b l e s
tuid t h e G r e e n ' s f u n c t i o n s .
Do Witt works e x c l u s i v e l y in c o n f i g u r a t i o n
manifestly
The
particle
P a r t l y f o r t h i s reason a s l i g h t l y d i f f e r e n t p o i n t o f view h a s
When t h e r e s u l t i n g f i e l d i s
a very non l i n e a r
(typically
n o n - p o l y n o m i a l ) i n t e r a c t i o n i s o b t a i n e d between m a s s l e s s s p i n two
g r a v i t o n s ( i . e . r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s o f t h e P o i n c a r c group) p r o p a g a t i n g i n
t h i s Minkowski s p a c e .
been d i s c u s s e d in 52 in t h e c o n t e x t o f an e x t e r n a l g r a v i t a t i o n a l
and t h e comments made t h e r e apply h e r e .
field
advantage o f r e d u c i n g t h e t e c h n i c a l p r o b l e m , a t l e a s t
superficially,
(29)
and S. Gupta
(30)(37)
T h i s approach was i n i t i a t e d by
enthusiastically
( 3 ' i ) ( 35 )
'
The s t r u c t u r e i s s i m i l a r i n many r e s p e c t s t o t h a t o f t h e
Yong-Millo t h e o r y in t h a t t h e g e n e r a l c o o r d i n a t e i n v a r i a n c e m a n i f e s t a
i t s e l f t h r o u g h t h e e x i s t e n c e of a n o n - a b e l i a n gauge group.
t a s k s t o be performed a r e indeed t h e same i n b o t h c a s e s .
i)
The main
Namely:
C o n s t r u c t t h e c o r r e c t Feynman r u l e s which l e a d t o a
unitary S-matrix.
ii)
C o n s t r u c t t h e analogue o f t h e Ward-Takahashi
which s h o u l d r e f l e c t t h e gauge
iii)
Find an a p p r o p r i a t e ( i . e .
identities
invariance,
gauge i n v a r i a n t )
rgularisation
scheme.
iv)
v)
I n v e s t i g a t e t h e re normal i s a t i o n of t h e t h e o r y ,
Find t e c h n i q u e s f o r summing up u s e f u l s e t s of Feynman
graphs.
I t i s t h e r e f o r e s u f f i c i e n t t o remark h e r e
t h e Feynman r u l e s , i s t h a t of a f u n c t i o n a l p a t h i n t e g r a l .
In a
(which
= H |
i/
(d$) ( x , ) . . . $ ( x n ) e
IU)d*X
" '
(U.2)
J=0
where t h e vacuum-vacuum a m p l i t u d e in t h e p r e s e n c e of t h e e x t e r n a l
31
nource J ( x ) in
i
OUt
nnd
II
is
noparated
XV
(X
in
<0|0>i" = N |
some
into
a
(d*) e
normalisation
the
sum
coupling
o f
(It.3)
constant.
f r e e
constant),
I f
part
Lq
the
plu3
lagrangian
an
I($)
i n t e r a c t i o n
the
basic
amplitude
(.3)
part
i . e .
then
is
can
be
(k.k)
written
as
:0|0>^
= N j (d*)
(d$)
Ct.5)
Now t h e f u n c t i o n a l i n t e g r a l
Z o ( J ) = I (d*) e
(It.6)
and
can be e x p l i c i t l y computed t o be
- \
ZQ(J) = e
d"x d V J ( x )
AF(x-y)J(y)
(It.7)
32
6/6J)d*x
If the operator e
space-time
In f a c t
this
corresponding
in b o t h a p p r o a c h e s .
The s i t u a t i o n f o r a t h e o r y which a d m i t s a gauge group i s more
complicated.
In t h e c a s e of
e l e c t r o m a g n e t i s u t h e r e a r e in f a c t no major p r o b l e m s , p r i m a r i l y b e c a u s e
t h e gauge group i s a b e l i a n .
However, f o r t h e Yang-Mills o r
gravitational
t h e o r i e s , which a r e d i s t i n g u i s h e d by p o s s e s s i n g n o n - a b e l i a n gauge g r o u p s ,
t h e s i t u a t i o n i s more complex.
The a c t u a l form of t h e f u n c t i o n a l
integral
(31)
was f i r s t e x h i b i t e d by De Witt and t h e n by Fadeev and Popov
and h a s
been e x t e n s i v e l y i n v e s t i g a t e d s i n c e t h e n .
that,
The main s u r p r i s e i s
quanta
33
dimensional r e g u l a r i a a t i o n .
tree
covariantly
d i s c u s s e d i s whether o r n o t t h e t h e o r y i s r e n o r m u l i s a b l e .
Certainly a
s u p e r f i c i a l power count l e a d s t o a h i g h l y d i v e r g e n t t h e o r y ,
a result
The s i t u a t i o n i s n o t c o m p l e t e l y
w a t e r t i g h t because i t i s p o s s i b l e t h a t m i r a c u l o u s c a n c e l l a t i o n s nay s t i l l
occur ( p o s s i b l y only f o r c e r t a i n c h o i c e s o f m a t t e r
lagrangian).
U n f o r t u n a t e l y t h e extreme complexity of t h e n e c e s s a r y c a l c u l a t i o n s
two loop graph would be very h e l p f u l )
(a
means t h a t a d e f i n i t i v e answer i s
not l i k e l y t o be f o r t h c o m i n g in t h e i n m e d i a t e f u t u r e .
The r e a d e r i s
r e f e r r e d t o M.J. D u f f ' s c h a p t e r f o r f u r t h e r e n l i g h t e n m e n t on t h i s p o i n t
but perhaps i t i s worth commenting a l i t t l e on t h e s i g n i f i c a n c e of t h e
probable n o n - r e n o r m a l i s a b i l i t y of the theory.
such a s i t u a t i o n t o p o s i t i v e a d v a n t a g e .
It is possible to turn
polynomial l a g r a n g i a n s (which by c o n v e n t i o n a l r e c k o n i n g a r e
certainly
n o n - r e n o r m o l i s a b l e ) r e c e i v e d c o n s i d e r a b l e a t t e n t i o n a few y e a r s ago w i t h
t h e use o f a method which i n e f f e c t f i x e d , s i m u l t a n e o u s l y , t h e v a l u e s o f
i n f i n i t e l y many s u b t r a c t i o n c o n s t a n t s i n an S - m a t r i x e l e m e n t .
Abdus Solum,
J . S t r a t h d e e and I ( 33) a p p l i e d t h e s e t e c h n i q u e s t o t h e i n t e r a c t i o n of t h e
31.
divergent.
-1/x
around x = O a s e
-1/x
= 1 - '/
+
X
as x
2!x2
1 - <o + co . . . ,
is
T h i s r e s u l t can be r e g a r d e d as a p a r t i a l
r e a l i s a t i o n o f t h e o f t e n - q u o t e d e x p e c t a t i o n t h a t g r a v i t y can a c t as a
u n i v e r s a l r e g u l a t o r due t o quantum s m e a r i n g of t h e l i g h t cone.
t h e Feynman loop i n t e g r a l s a r e t r u n c a t e d a t 102 eV('v.
hence y i e l d f i n i t e numbers.
In e f f e c t
10
cms.) and
However, b e c a u s e of t h e very
considerable
t e c h n i c a l complexity of t h e p r o b l e m ,
t h e a p p l i c a t i o n of t h e s e techniques
t o t h e p u r e s e l f - i n t e r a c t i n g g r a v i t a t i o n a l f i e l d was n e v e r a c h i e v e d .
Some f u r t h e r t h o u g h t s on t h i s t o p i c w i l l be found in t h e c h a p t e r by
P r o f e s s o r Salara.
From t h e c o n v e n t i o n a l p o i n t of view t h e n o n - r e n o r m a l i s a b i l i t y of
a quantum f i e l d t h e o r y i s f r e q u e n t l y r e g a r d e d as b e i n g s u f f i c i e n t l y
d i s a s t r o u s t o j u s t i f y t h r o w i n g away t h e u n d e r l y i n g c l a s s i c a l
t h e o r y and r e p l a c i n g i t by a r e n o r m a l i s a b l e o n e .
field
A good example of
t h i s i s a f f o r d e d by t h e c u r r e n t l y p o p u l a r w e a k - i n t e r a c t i o n models which
successfully replace the old non-renormalisable four-fermion theory.
t h e c a s e of g e n e r a l r e l a t i v i t y t h e s i t u a t i o n i s s l i g h t l y d i f f e r e n t .
In
The
f o u r - f e r m i o n w e a k - i n t e r a c t i o n t h e o r y was only i n v e n t e d in t h e f i r s t p l a c e
f o r p u r e l y quantum f i e l d t h e o r e t i c use and no-one can complain i f t h e
35
However,
quite
purely
Indeed t h e y a r e more l i k e l y
t o i n s i s t t h a t t h e n o n - r e n o r m a l i s a b i l i t y i m p l i e s t h e r e j e c t i o n of quantum
f i e l d theory!
N e v e r t h e l e s s i t i s c l e a r t h a t a f a i r l y l a r g e amount of
e f f o r t w i l l be s p e n t in t h e n e a r f u t u r e i n t r y i n g t o f i n d a r e n o r m a l i s a b l e
t h e o r y of g r a v i t y which could p o s s i b l y s t i l l be g e n e r a l l y c o v a r i a n t and
a c h i e v e i t s ends by t h e s u b t l e i n t r o d u c t i o n of c e r t a i n m a t t e r - f i e l d t e r m s .
A t h i r d r e a c t i o n t o t h e n o n - r e n o r m a l i s a b i l i t y of t h e
covariant
t h e o r y i s t h a t t h e t r o u b l e has i t s o r i g i n i n t h e s e p a r a t i o n o f t h e
g r a v i t a t i o n a l f i e l d i n t o a c l a s s i c a l background p l u s a quantum c o r r e c t i o n .
Such s p l i t s a r e very u n n a t u r a l w i t h i n t h e c o n t e n t of t h e c l a s s i c a l
theory
T h i s i s one of t h e p o i n t s i n f a v o u r of
t h e c a n o n i c a l approaches w h i c h , b e c a u s e o f t h e i r r a t h e r s t r o n g e r
geometrical flavour,
particular
problem i n c a n o n i c a l q u a n t i s a t i o n i s due p r i m a r i l y t o t h e f a c t t h a t
the
trouble-free.
r a t h e r than t h a t t h e formalism
36
5.
to
The e s s e n t i a l i d e a i s t o e x t r a c t from
The a l t e r n a t i v e s u p e r s p a c e - b a s e d t e c h n i q u e
called 'covariant'
This
canonical
(sometimes
c a n o n i c a l q u a n t i s a t i o n ) w i l l be c o n s i d e r e d i n 6.
As
t h e r e a r e no o t h e r a r t i c l e s in t h i s volume which d e a l s p e c i f i c a l l y w i t h
t h e s e t o p i c s ( u n l i k e f o r example c o v a r i a n t q u a n t i s a t i o n )
d i s c u s s e d i n some d e t a i l
t h e y w i l l be
here.
The a p p r o p r i a t e
(39)
t e c h n i q u e i s w e l l known f o l l o w i n g t h e work of Dirac
and Misner (ADM)' 1 1 0 '.
and A r n o w i t t , Deser
In o r d e r t o i l l u s t r a t e t h e p r i n c i p l e
involved,
c o n s i d e r t h e simple example of a m a s s l e s s s c a l a r f i e l d t h e o r y in a f l a t
space-time with the lagrangian
(5-1)
The c o r r e s p o n d i n g a c t i o n
is
(5.2)
37
or,
X$3 = 0 ,
(5.3)
equivalently,
- V2 -
where
= 0
(5.It)
<J ==
3x
(5-5)
3$
which can o b v i o u s l y be i n v e r t e d in t h e form
The Hamiltonian d e n s i t y
tfU.n)
= n
) = it
(5.6)
is
) - Li , < f r ( . ) >
= - i 2 t V 2 2* 2 + x/i, 4."
z cj>
(5-7)
(5.8)
(5-9)
(5-10)
where H<t) =
d 3 x H)
order
An a p p r o p r i a t e such
i r i n c i p l e in t h i s c a s e i s simply
(5.11)
fliich, i f t h e f i e l d s
and it
a r e v a r i e d as independent v a r i a b l e s ,
yields
j r e c i s e l y t h e Hamilton e q u a t i o n s .
C l e a r l y t h e e x p r e s s i o n in b r a c k e t s i n
>qn ( 5 - 1 1 ) i s j u s t t h e Hamiltonian
density.
C l a s s i c a l l y , i f t h e c a n o n i c a l v a r i a b l e s 1(1 and tr a r e s p e c i f i e d on t h e
;pacelike hypersurface t = t
t h e n eqns ( 5 - 9 ) and ( 5 - 1 0 ) a r e
integrated
.0 g i v e t h e v a l u e s on any l a t e r ( o r e a r l i e r ) t = t^ h y p e r s u r f a c e .
The
relations
(5.12)
md t h e f i e l d s a t t i m e t
a r e e x p r e s s e d in terms o f t h o s e a t t i m e t
by
39
(x,t ) = e
-i/K H U . w H t j - ^ )
nfx.tj) = c
(5.13)
i/K H($,Tr)(t1-to)
*(x,tQ) e
(5. ill)
[(x),
;<*)] = i ( 3 ) ( x - x )
and t h e t i m e e v o l u t i o n i s c a r r i e d by t h e s t a t e
- i / K HU.it)
(5.15)
vector:
(tj-to)
<i>t
(5-16)
o
The main problem i s t o r e p r o d u c e t h i s t y p e of a n a l y s i s f o r t h e
e q u a t i o n s of motion of g e n e r a l r e l a t i v i t y .
Even a t t h e c l a s s i c a l
level
equations
G u V (g, 3g) = 0
(5.17)
i)
Mainely:
to
1)0
o r l e s s o b l i g e d t o c o n s i d e r t h e Cauchy problem o v e r an
arbitrary spacelike hypersurface.
ii)
The E i n s t e i n e q u a t i o n s G^1' = 0 do n o t i n v o l v e t h e
time d e r i v a t i v e s of t h e metric t e n s o r g
that,
as in eqn ( 5 - 5 ) ,
" ^ 6 i
dp
ats
cxB
thus
second-order
anticipating
r a t h e r t h a n t o genuine e q u a t i o n s o f m o t i o n .
The r e m a i n i n g e q u a t i o n s G^J = 0 do n o t d e t e r m i n e t h e t i m e
e v o l u t i o n of a l l of t h e components of g ^
constraints G
o
11
even i f t h e
= 0 have been s a t i s f i e d ,
To i n v e s t i g a t e t h e s e p o i n t s f u r t h e r i t i s u s e f u l t o apply t h e s t a n d a r d
ADM t e c h n i q u e and decompose t h e m e t r i c t e n s o r as
- H 2 + W.1 N . '
J
N.
0
'
V, = (
'5.18)
I
N
where w,v = 0 . . . 3 ; i , j = 1 , 2 , 3 .
chosen c o n s i d e r t h e ' 3 + 1 '
ij
To s e e why t h i s p a r t i c u l a r form i s
decomposition of s p a c e - t i m e i n t o a f a m i l y o f
t h r e e - d i m e n s i o n a l s p a c e - l i k e h y p e r s u r f a c e s p a r a m e t e r i s e d by t h e v a l u e o f
an a r b i t r a r i l y chosen t i m e c o o r d i n a t e x .
The n a t u r a l m e t r i c induced on
a t y p i c a l e q u a l - t i m e h y p e r s u r f a c e i s simply g . . (x,x)
^J
(3) i "
o
i s w r i t t e n as
g1J ( x , x ) .
and i t s
inverse
Thus we w r i t e
1.1
dT = N ( x , x )
dx
where t h e f u n c t i o n N i s kncwn as t h e l a p s e f u n c t i o n .
c o r r e s p o n d i n g normal v e c t o r ,
(5.19)
Now c o n s i d e r t h e
whose b a s e has c o o r d i n a t e s
l y i n g in t h e f i r s t h y p e r s u r f a c e .
(x',x ,x ),
(x',x2,x3)
coordinates
by a v e c t o r O y i n g in t h e second h y p e r s u r f a c e x
(x,x)
s k e t c h e d in F i g .
Fig.
a r e known as s h i f t f u n c t i o n s and t h e s i t u a t i o n
The
is
1.1.
1.1
^
>>
The s p a c e - l i k e v e c t o r AC = AB + BC = (N'dx + d x 1 , N 2 dx + d x 2 , N 3 dx + dx 3 )
and t h e r e f o r e t h e l e n g t h of DC i s :
1(2
ds 2 = g
pv
= ( - N2 + N. N 1 ) ( d x ) Z + 2 N. dx d x j + g. . dx 1 d x .
l
J
J
(5-20)
1
^
I
hi
(5.21)
action
could be w r i t t e n i n terms of t h e s e f i e l d v a r i a b l e s as
I = f
J
where
f
J
d"x
[( 3I)
Rj
{(det{3)g)
and
+ a four-divergence)
K.. s
(N.,. + N.,. - g..
)
ij
2N
llj
jli
l j ,o
In eqn ( 5 - 2 2 ) t h e s u p e r s c r i p t s
/2
(5.22)
(5-23)
r e f e r t o q u a n t i t i e s computed with
t h e induced t h r e e - s p a c e m e t r i c and t h e o r i g i n a l f o u r - s p a c e m e t r i c
U3
respectively.
In p a r t i c u l a r
( 3 ^
h y p e r s u r f a c e l a b e l l e d by t h e p a r a m e t e r x and hence d e s c r i b e s t h e
i n t r i n s i c c u r v a t u r e of t h i s s u r f a c e .
On t h e o t h e r hand t h e t e n s o r K . .
ij
i n eqn ( 5 . 2 3 ) ( i n which 1 r e f e r s t o c o v a r i a n t d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n w i t h
respect
t o t h e t h r e e - m e t r i c ) i s , g e o m e t r i c a l l y , t h e e x t r i n s i c c u r v a t u r e of t h e
h y p e r s u r f a c e and as such d e s c r i b e s t h e manner i n which t h a t s u r f a c e i s
embedded i n t h e s u r r o u n d i n g fouidimensional geometry.
The main a d v a n t a g e o f t h i s form i s t h a t t h e t i m e d e r i v a t i v e
is
j i
__
6g
= - ( d e t 3g)J
r0
,ij
0)
ij
- ^ i
(2Nklk-
( 3 )
6kigk,s0)>
(5.2.,)
N o t i c e t h a t t h e r e i s no N o r H. term in t h e l a g r a n g i a n and as a r e s u l t
formal c a l c u l a t i o n
gives
(5 25)
'
6N
- 61
=
= n0
(5.26)
6N.
l
The f i n a l r e s u l t o f a l l t h i s t h e o r y i s t h a t t h e E i n s t e i n a c t i o n
can be w r i t t e n ( a n a l o g o u s l y t o eqn ( 5 . 1 1 ) ) i n f i r s t - o r d e r
form as
principle
variational
lili
{ i j y - H u C" U
d*x
i j
g^)}
(5.27)
where N = U and
o
C ; ( d e t ( 3 ) 6 ) " J
( , i j .. - 1 b.1 w.j) - ( d e t ( 3 ) g ) J
J. J
i.
J
(3)
(5-28)
I f we vary t h e a c t i o n w i t h r e s p e c t t o it 1 J we
which may be s o l v e d as
rs' V
which i n f a c t i s e x a c t l y eqn ( 5 - 2 l i ) .
respect t o
(5
-30)
On t h e o t h e r hand v a r i a t i o n w i t h
l e a d s t o an e q u a t i o n of t h e form
it
rs
, )
u
(5.3i)
and e q u a t i o n s ( 5 . 3 0 ) and ( 5 . 3 1 ) a r e , t o g e t h e r , e x a c t l y t h e G. J = 0
Einstein
equations.
F i n a l l y i f H i s v a r i e d we o b t a i n
U
= 0
(5.32)
1,5
r e s u l t s a c h i e v e d so f a r a t t h e c l a s s i c a l
a)
level:
Indeed N^ p l a y s t h e
is
role,
o f a Lagrange m u l t i p l i e r and
c e r t a i n l y does n o t count as a t r u e c a n o n i c a l v a r i a b l e .
It
i s t h e g r a v i t a t i o n a l analogue of A^ in t h e Maxwell
electromagnetic
b)
theory.
In s p i t e o f i t s n o n - c o v a r i a n t - l o o k i n g form,
s t i l l generally covariant.
the theory
In o t h e r words eqn ( 5 - 2 7 )
is
is
canonical
form b e c a u s e ( a s we s h a l l s e e l a t e r ) f o u r o u t o f t h e s i x <5*
iJ
components can be e l i m i n a t e d by c h o o s i n g a s e t o f s p a c e time c o o r d i n a t e s .
one o f t h e A components d i s a p p e a r s in e l e c t r o m a g n e t i c
t h e o r y when, f o r example, t h e r a d i a t i o n gauge d i v A = 0
is specified.
c)
(g. . , it
J
) cannot be
that
arbitrarily
s p e c i f i e d on an i n i t i a l h y p e r s u r f a c e b u t must s a t i s f y f o u r
constraints.
d)
The dynamical e q u a t i o n s a r e i n f a c t c o n t a i n e d t w i c e i n t h e
s y s t e m of eqns (5-30) ( 5 . 3 1 ) ( 5 - 3 2 ) in t h e f o l l o w i n g s e n s e :
( 5 . 3 0 ) ( 5 . 3 1 ) a r e s a t i s f i e d , t h e n C u ( n , g ) = on any l a t e r
hypersurface.
In o t h e r words t h e c o n s t r a i n t s
are
c o n s e r v e d i n time - i n f a c t by v i r t u e of t h e B i a n c h i
identities.
)
The c o n v e r s e i s a l s o t r u e .
Namely i f n 1 J and g^
are
chosen s o t h a t C^t tt , g ) = 0 on a l l h y p e r s u r f a c e s t h e n t h e
= 0 e q u a t i o n s ( 5 . 3 0 ) and (5-31) a r e
automatically
In t h i s s e n s e t h e dynamical G..J = 0 e q u a t i o n s
satisfied.
can be r e g a r d e d as o c c u r r i n g t w i c e .
ki.
I f a t t h e c l a s s i c a l l e v e l g.^ and it
a r e r e g a r d e d as b e i n g
c o n j u g a t e v a r i a b l e s , so t h a t a t some f i x e d t i m e we have t h e
Poisson bracket
{g. . ( x ) ,
relations
'(x)),
P.B.
(x " i ) ,
(5-33)
then
(5-3IO
(5.35)
which shew t h a t j
t r a n s f o r m a t i o n sense) of t h e i n f i n i t e s i m a l coordinate t r a n s f o r m a t i o n
xU
xp + p(x).
The q u a n t i t i e s C1' s a t i s f y a P o i s s o n b r a c k e t
It 7
a l g e b r a which i s a r e f l e c t i o n o f t h i s
fact.
and
'non-covariant'
approaches t o c a n o n i c a l q u a n t i s a t i o n go t h e i r s e p a r a t e ways.
In t h e
c o v a r i a n t approach ( s e e 6) t h e v a r i a b l e s i n t h e a c t i o n p r i n c i p l e eqn
(5.27),
q u a n t i s e d as t h e y s t a n d .
On t h e o t h e r hand i n t h e n o n - c o v a r i a n t approach
are
t h e s y s t e m i s reduced f u r t h e r c l a s s i c a l l y
S o l v e t h e e q u a t i o n s C u (7i,g) = 0 e x p l i c i t l y f o r f o u r of t h e
twelve ( g ^ j , "
) variables.
This i s p o s s i b l e in p r i n c i p l e ,
b u t , i n p r a c t i c e , has o n l y been a c h i e v e d
perturbatively.
T h i s l e a v e s e i g h t v a r i a b l e s i n t h e s t r u c t u r e whose t i m e
dependence i s d e s c r i b e d by e i g h t of t h e t w e l v e
e q u a t i o n s ( 5 - 3 0 ) and ( 5 - 3 1 ) ,
= 0
t h e r e m a i n i n g ones b e i n g
identities
i n t h e form C (ir,g) = 0 .
2)
Choose a system of c o o r d i n a t e s .
There a r e a number of
A sample s e l e c t i o n
is:
a)
11
Thi3 removes f o u r of t h e e i g h t
) v a r i a b l e s which a r e l e f t a f t e r s t e p 1 .
The e q u a t i o n s F l '(7i,g) = 0 ,
and ( 5 - 3 1 ) ,
plus equations
(5-30)
can be u s e d t o f i n d f o u r e l l i p t i c
1.8
d i f f e r e n t i a l e q u a t i o n s f o r N which can a l s o in
M
p r i n c i p l e be s o l v e d , t h u s e l i m i n a t i n g t h e l a g r a n g e
m u l t i p l i e r s ti ^ from t h e t h e o r y .
There i s on e x a c t
equations are
If the
However, t h e
3
time component of t h e Maxwell e q u a t i o n s p l u s Trot
( d i v A) = 0 y i e l d s t h e e l l i p t i c e q u a t i o n - V2 A
= j
as Ao =
j o.
A t y p i c a l example i n t h e g r a v i t a t i o n a l c a s e would be
the conditions
6 i
. /o
((det^g)* gij)
. = 0
>J
which l e a d t o t h e e l l i p t i c
N,./
"
{<det(3)g)J
(3)
R(g)
(Nilj
equations
=0
NjU -
( 3
y j
which c a n , i n p r i n c i p l e , be s o l v e d .
N*)
IK
2N*ij} . = 0
1J
However, i f t h e t h r e e -
s p a c e i s non-compact t h e s e e q u a t i o n s w i l l need t o be
'9
supplemented w i t h s u i t a b l e boundary
conditions,
0,
at
spatial
infinity.
b)
T h i s i s on i n t r i n s i c d e f i n i t i o n which
which w i l l t y p i c a l l y be
e x p r e s s e d i n terms of t h e v a r i o u s components o f it
and g . . in t h a t c o o r d i n a t e s y s t e m ,
J
v a l u e s of t h e c o o r d i n a t e .
are precisely
the
to
a)
and t h e r e d u c t i o n p r o c e e d s from
a) a g a i n .
The a n a l o g u e i n
It
(div
The n e t r e s u l t o f f o l l o w i n g any o f t h e s e t h r e e a l t e r n a t i v e
( o r any o f t h e n u n i e r of p o s s i b l e m i x t u r e s of them) i s t h a t t h e H
steps
5 0
v a r i a b l e s and f o u r of t h e ( g . . , *
-t J
) v a r i a b l e s d r o p o u t of t h e s y s t e m
for just
v a r i a b l e s in t e r m s o f t h e chosen c o o r d i n a t e s .
four ( g . . ,
^J
kA
)
The f i n a l c o u n t i s
s i n c e t h e e x p e c t e d two i n t r i n s i c d e g r e e s o f f r e e d o m o f t h e
components o f t h e g r a v i t a t i o n a l
correct
radiation
f i e l d w i l l i n v o l v e two p a i r s o f
canonical
variables.
The n e x t s t e p i s t o c o n s t r u c t a ' r e d u c e d '
action principle
which,
One
substitute
coordinates.
U n f o r t u n a t e l y t h e r e i s no g u a r a n t e e t h a t t h e r e s u l t i n g s y s t e m i s in t h e
d e s i r e d c a n o n i c a l form.
I t seems t o b e n e c e s s a r y t o l i n k s t e p s l )
and
i3
e l i m i n a t e d i n s t e p l ) i s t h e momentum which i s c o n j u g a t e ( i n t h e s e n s e o f
t h e a c t i o n i n ( 5 . 2 7 ) ) t o t h e c o o r d i n a t e s which a r e e l i m i n a t e d i n s t e p 2 ) .
A v e r y n i c e d i s c u s s i o n o f t h i s p o i n t and i n d e e d o f t h e whole s u b j e c t o f
. . .
.
v,
(il)
c a n o n i c a l d e c o m p o s i t i o n i s c o n t a i n e d i n K. Kuchar s p a p e r s .
Once t h e s y s t e m i s i n c a n o n i c a l f o r m w i t h , s a y , c a n o n i c a l
w r i t t e n s y m b o l i c a l l y as
) A.B = 1 , 2 ,
variables
one p r o c e e d s i n a n a l o g y w i t h
t h e simple s c a l a r f i e l d d i s c u s s e d i n t h e opening of t h i s s e c t i o n .
In
p a r t i c u l a r e q u a l - t i m e commutation r e l a t i o n s o f t h e form
CiA(x.t), nB(x,t)]
= ih' 6 5 ( 3 ) ( X - r)
(5.30)
a r e imposed, s u p p l e m e n t e d w i t h t h e a p p r o p r i a t e H e i s e n b e r g e q u a t i o n s o f
motion,
o r i f p r e f e r r e d a S c h r o d i n g e r p i c t u r e f o r m a l i s m can b e u s e d .
51
(Romcmbcr again t h a t t h e b a s i c c a n o n i c a l v a r i a b l e s a r e d e f i n e d on u
fixed three-muni f o l d ) .
An i m p o r t a n t a d v a n t a g e o f t h i s q u a n t i s a t i o n scheme i s t h a t i t
is
There i s c l e a r l y no
quantisation)
In p a r t i c u l a r
the
quanta'.
is
Some
of t h e w o r s t of t h e s e a r e :
a)
In a f l a t - s p a c e
quantum f i e l d t h e o r y t h e r e i s u s u a l l y a f a i r l y
natural
n o t i n g e n e r a l be implementable in t h e quantum t h e o r y by a
unitary operator,
i t f o l l o w s t h a t d i f f e r e n t such c h o i c e s
w i l l l e a d t o g e n u i n e l y i n e q u i v a l e n t quantum t h e o r i e s .
Much
years.
(1,2)
In p a r t i c u l a r York
A c l o s e l y r e l a t e d problem i s t h e i n v a r i a n c e o r o t h e r w i s e of
111.
t h e quantum t h e o r y ,
under a change o f t h e v a r i a b l e s
T h i s q u e s t i o n , which c l e a r l y
i n c l u d e s t h e problem of t h e g e n e r a l c o v a r i a n c e of t h e t h e o r y , i s one
o f t h e h a r d e s t t o answer.
present.
( C o n c e p t u a l as w e l l as t e c h n i c a l problems a r e i n v o l v e d .
For
quantised!)
coupling terras.
r e s o l v e d in i s o l a t i o n from a) and b ) .
d)
I t i s always n o t o r i o u s l y d i f f i c u l t t o do any c a l c u l a t i o n s
a genuine c a n o n i c a l framework l i k e t h e p r e s e n t o n e .
If a
f l a t - s p a c e d e c o m p o s i t i o n i s performed t h e n non ( L o r e n t z )
c o v a r i a n t H e i s e n b e r g p e r t u r b a t i o n t h e o r y can be used but
i t i s very messy and l i t t l e a c t u a l c a l c u l a t i o n u s i n g t h e
n o n - c o v a r i a n t c a n o n i c a l approach has been p o s s i b l e .
.
(3)
y e a r s ago Russo and A r n o w i t t
A few
computed t h e t r e e graph
( i . e . n o n - c o v a r i a n t Feynman g r a p h s ) c o n t r i b u t i o n s t o p i o n g r a v i t o n s c a t t e r i n g shown in F i g .
1.2.
in
53
t
/
> grnvitonn /
\
Pions
Fig.
1.2
unci i t i s c o m f o r t i n g t o f i n d t h a t t h e f i n a l r e s u l t i s t h e same as t h a t
(28)
o b t a i n e d by De Witt
f o r t h e same p r o c e s s u s i n g h i s c o v a r i a n t
approach.
I f a f l a t - s p a c e expansion i s
the
quantisation.
An
years
a v o i d s t h i s by q u a n t i s i n g t h e system b e f o r e s o l v i n g t h e c o n s t r a i n t s o r
choosing t h e
coordinates.
Once a g a i n t h e s t a r t i n g p o i n t i s t h e a c t i o n p r i n c i p l e in eqn ( 5 - 2 7 ) :
5li
1=
d"x
<ij .J -
c"(n,6)}
(6.1)
b u t a t t e n t i o n i s now
equations
C^U.g) = 0 .
(6.2)
As n o t e d in 5 t h e s e e q u a t i o n s , i f t r u e f o r a l l t i m e s ,
are
c l a s s i c a l l y e q u i v a l e n t t o a l l of t h e E i n s t e i n e q u a t i o n s and t h e r e f o r e
it
seems r e a s o n a b l e t o a t t e m p t t o b u i l d up a quantum t h e o r y b a s e d p u r e l y on
them a l o n e .
The f i r s t s t e p
(6) ( 1 ) ( )
.
i s t o assign operator s t a t u s t o
kt
a l l components o f g. . and u
and assume t h a t t h e y s a t i s f y t h e S c h r o d i n g e r
^J
p i c t u r e c a n o n i c a l commutation r e l a t i o n s
..(x),
iJ
n k J L ( X )] = iK [ k
i
6 ( 3 ) ( X - jr)
(6.3)
in w h i c h , i t s h o u l d be emphasised once a g a i n , a t h r e e - d i m e n s i o n a l m a n i f o l d
has been f i x e d , once and f o r a l l , upon which t h e o p e r a t o r s g . . ( x )
^J
ki
it
(x) a r e d e f i n e d .
and
We w i l l assume ( s i n c e t h i s i s t h e c a s e f o r which
s u p e r s p a c e q u a n t i s a t i o n i s normally c o n s i d e r e d ) u n l e s s t h e c o n t r a r y
s t a t e d , t h a t t h i s i s a compact s p a c e .
is
I t i s then hypothesised t h a t t h e
c o n s t r a i n t e q u a t i o n s ( 6 . 2 ) a r e t o be imposed in t h e form of
operator
c o n s t r a i n t s on t h e allowed s t a t e v e c t o r ty
= 0
(6.10
111.
N o t i c e t h a t t h e t h e o r y has d e l i b e r a t e l y
been s e t up in a S c h r o d i n g e r p i c t u r e way.
g. . and n
A c t u a l l y i f one were t o r e g a r d
as b e i n g t r u e c a n o n i c a l v a r i a b l e s ( a s i s s u g g e s t e d - f a l s e l y -
t h e S c h r o d i n g e r p i c t u r e t o t h e H e i s e n b e r g p i c t u r e and indeed e v e r y t h i n g
a p p e a r s t o be s t a t i c with no change in t i m e !
This f a c t lead
originally
However, a l t h o u g h
t h e m a t h e m a t i c a l s t a t e m e n t s a r e c o r r e c t t h e i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of them in t e r m s
of s t a t i o n a r i n e s s i s i n c o r r e c t .
regarded
The a p p a r e n t t i m e - i n d e p e n d e n c e s h o u l d be
as f o r example
(These comments do n o t
n e c e s s a r i l y h o l d i f t h e t h r e e - s p a c e b e i n g c o n s i d e r e d i s non-compact.
p o s s i b i l i t y o f f i x i n g r e f e r e n c e frames a t s p a t i a l i n f i n i t y a l t e r s
situation).
I n summary t h e n , t h e p r e s e n t approach t o
The
the
quantisation
(6.5)
and
c u (i k \
=0
(6.6)
to
56
from which a l l d y n a m i c a l i n f o r m a t i o n i s t o be e x t r a c t e d a f t e r s p e c i f y i n g
t i m e i n some way.
and none i s n e c e s s a r y a t t h i s s t a g e .
The r e a l e s s e n c e o f t h i s
approach
S u p e r s p a c e comes i n
form a b o v e ,
11
As m e n t i o n e d i n 55 t h e C
a m a j o r problem
are, classically,
the
g e n e r a t o r s o f c o o r d i n a t e t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s and as such s a t i s f y a P o i s s o n
b r a c k e t a l g e b r a which c l o s e s on i t s e l f .
This l a t t e r f e a t u r e l e a d s t o the
d e s i r a b l e p r o p e r t y t h a t no new c o n s t r a i n t s can b e i n t r o d u c e d i n t o t h e
t h e o r y by t a l c i n g P o i s s o n b r a c k e t s o f t h e o l d o n e s .
C l e a r l y one r e q u i r e s
operator
I n d e e d i f t h e s e commutators do n o t c l o s e upon
t h e m s e l v e s i t i s d i f f i c u l t t o s e e how t h e quantum t h e o r y c o u l d e v e r be
generally covariant.
However, u n f o r t u n a t e l y , t h e C1J
functions involve
t e r m s i n which t h e c a n o n i c a l v a r i a b l e s a p p e a r m u l t i p l i e d t o g e t h e r and t h e
. C* 6 )
o p e r a t o r o r d e r i n g p r o b l e m looms t o t h e f o r e once a g a i n
This problem
s h o u l d r e a l l y b e d i s c u s s e d a t t h e 3ame t i m e a s t h a t o f t h e e f f e c t o f
c h a n g i n g t h e v a r i a b l e s which a r e chosen i n t h e f i r s t p l a c e t o b e c a n o n i c a l .
To t h e b e s t of my knowledge n o - o n e h a s y e t d e m o n s t r a t e d t h e e x i s t e n c e o f
a c h o i c e of c a n o n i c a l v a r i a b l e s and o p e r a t o r o r d e r i n g s i n which t h e
c o n s t r a i n t e q u a t i o n s behave themselves i n t h e sense above!
I t i s a l s o w o r t h n o t i n g t h a t , c l a s s i c a l l y , t h e m e t r i c t e n s o r obeys
the positivity
condition
det(g.j) > 0.
(6.7)
I f s o m e t h i n g l i k e t h i s were t o b e c a r r i e d a c r o s s i n t o t h e quantum t h e o r y
111.
f o r b o t h g. . ( x ) and it
iJ
(y.) t o
a d j o i n t o p e r a t o r s obey a H e i s e n b e r g - t y p e u n c e r t a i n t y r e l a t i o n , then t h e
5poet rum o f n e i t h e r o f them i s l i k e l y t o be bounded below.
d e r i n e g. .
l J
i J
and r e g a r d t h e 3
One c o u l d perhaps
3 m a t r i x $ as t h e c a n o n i c a l
variable
to
I t s h o u l d be c l e a r by now t h a t
the
insisting
t o o r i g i d l y on e n f o r c i n g a l l t h e canons of t h e c o n v e n t i o n a l approach in
this
situation.
In o r d e r t o p r o c e e d f u r t h e r i t i s n e c e s s a r y t o f i n d a c o n c r e t e
representation
(6.6).
The f o r m '
'
t h e p a s t , i n p a r t i c u l a r by W h e e l e r '
5 1
',
i s t h a t in which t h e
state
v e c t o r s and o p e r a t o r s a r e d e f i n e d as f u n c t i o n a l s of t h e m e t r i c t e n s o r
f i e l d and f u n c t i o n a l d e r i v a t i v e s r e s p e c t i v e l y ,
a c c o r d i n g t o t h e scheme
(6.8)
UyteM)
G^O - B y W
c^a-f
fr^-a
(6.9)
(6.10)
111.
T h i s i s c l e a r l y c l o s e l y r e l a t e d t o t h e f u n c t i o n a l r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s of t h e
c a n o n i c a l commutation r e l a t i o n s c o n s i d e r e d i n t h e I n t r o d u c t i o n
However,
(1).
t h e r e i s an i m p o r t a n t d i f f e r e n c e in t h a t in t h e u s u a l c a s e t h e r e
On t h e o t h e r hand t h e a s s i g n m e n t s i n eqns
( 6 . 9 ) and ( 6 . 1 0 ) a r e only t o be r e g a r d e d as f o r m a l .
s t a t e vectors
In p a r t i c u l a r t h e
do not y e t c a r r y a H i l b e r t s p a c e s t r u c t u r e and so q u e s t i o n s
o f t h e s e l f - a d j o i n t n e s s in p a r t i c u l a r , have no meaning.
The d i s c u s s i o n
(6.11)
T h e r e f o r e t h e s t a t e - f u n c t i o n a l depends
o n l y on t h e c o o r d i n a t e - i n d e p e n d e n t , i n t r i n s i c geometry o f t h e t h r e e - s p a c e
and, t o emphasise t h i s ,
i s u s u a l l y w r i t t e n as
V=
is
functionals
D i a g r a m m a t i c a l l y we can r e p r e s e n t s u p e r s p a c e as i n
59
G transversally.
Fig.
1.3
E v i d e n t l y one m a j o r problem i s t o d i s c o v e r t h e f u l l m a t h e m a t i c a l
(514)
s t r u c t u r e of s u p e r s p a c e i t s e l f
analogous
I t i s worth remarking t h a t i n t h e
Q - s p a c e ' t r e a t m e n t of a c o n v e n t i o n a l quantum f i e l d t h e o r y
it
i s n e c e s s a r y t o i n c l u d e d i s t r i b u t i o n s as w e l l a s smooth J u n c t i o n s i n t h e
domain s p a c e of t h e s t a t e f u n c t i o n a l s .
e q u a l l y v a l i d h e r e and s u p e r s p a c e s h o u l d probably i n c l u d e
distribution-
metrics.
Returning t o the equations of motion, the f i n a l c o n s t r a i n t
is
6o
C ( ,
*[3g] = 0
g)
(6.12)
if
p r o p e r l y i n t e r p r e t e d , s h o u l d c o n t a i n a l l of t h e i n f o r m a t i o n c a r r i e d by
(55)
t h e quantum t h e o r y .
Gerlach
at l e a s t p a r t i a l l y c o n s i s t e n t .
He s t a r t e d w i t h t h e
a p p r o x i m a t i o n y[ G] <v> e
semi-classical
functions'.
, a J
the solutions
1
where a , a
are
arbitrary
G i f JiC''-*]
oa
q#
g e o m e t r i e s f i t i n t o a f o u r - g e o m e t r y (which would n o t be t h e c a s e f o r an
a r b i t r a r y f a m i l y o f t h r e e - g e o m e t r i e s ) which s a t i s f i e s E i n s t e i n ' s
The f u r t h e r development and i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of eqn ( 6 . 1 2 )
great care.
i)
requires
ii)
equations.
introduced,
depends on t h r e e numbers p e r s p a c e -
There i s as y e t no H i l b e r t space s t r u c t u r e on t h e s t a t e
v e c t o r s and t h e r e f o r e no p r o b a b i l i t y i n t e r p r e t a t i o n
possible.
is
Indeed w i t h o u t a H i l b e r t s p a c e i t i s not p o s s i b l e
6 1
t o t a l k ubout o b s e r v u b l e s ua o p e r a t o r s in t h e u3ual
aenae.
These t h r e e problems a r e mutually dependent and have t o be c o n s i d e r e d
t o g e t h e r as a b l o c k .
The c r u c i a l o b s e r v a t i o n i s t h a t i n g e n e r a l
relativity,
p a r t i c u l a r l y hen t h e s p a t i a l c r o s s - s e c t i o n s a r e compact, t i m e s h o u l d n o t be
r e g a r d e d as b e i n g e x t e r n a l t o t h e t h e o r y b u t r a t h e r as something v h i c h i o
t o be d e t e r m i n e d i n t r i n s i c a l l y in t e r m s of t h e geometry i t s e l f .
The
s i m p l e s t way t o s e e t h i s i s t o c o n s i d e r t h a t i n an expanding u n i v e r s e
( e x p a n d i n g t h a t i s w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e p r o p e r time o f a h y p o t h e t i c a l
observer) a n a t u r a l d e f i n i t i o n of global time i s
t = f d 3 x (aet<3)g)i
>v
(6.13)
in which t h e i n t e g r a l i s over t h e t h r e e - v o l u m e o f t h e u n i v e r s e .
This
shows c l e a r l y t h a t t h i s p a r t i c u l a r t i m e i s d e s c r i b e d i n t e r m s of t h e
i n t r i n s i c three-geometry.
That i s ,
two of t h e t h r e e d e g r e e s of freedom p e r s p a c e - p o i n t
(Ej 6 2
sa
above.
in
y)
c o r r e s p o n d t o dynamical v a r i a b l e s b u t t h e t h i r d (g^ s a y )
is really time.
I f we w r i t e s u g g e s t i v e l y g 3 ( x ) = T(jc) t h e n t h e fundamental
eqn ( 6 . 1 2 ) can be w r i t t e n as
c (
fc; . ^ . f r - ' V V
>
e2;T] -0.
(6.1.)
This i n t e r p r e t a t i o n , in e f f e c t ,
the
i s now, a t l e a s t i n p r i n c i p l e , c l e a r .
The answer t o
One s h o u l d form a
H i l b e r t s p a c e by c o n s t r u c t i n g a measure o f t h e h e u r i s t i c form d y t g ^ g ^ )
( b u t n o t e n o t d y ( 3 G ) ) and u s e i t t o d i s c u s s p r o b a b i l i t y e t c .
We hope t h a t
i t w i l l have t h e p r o p e r t y t h a t t h e o b s e r v a b l e q u a n t i t i e s w i l l
correspond
t o proper s e i r - a d j o i n t operators.
T h i s p r o p e r t y depends on t h e
form o f t h e q u a n t i s a t i o n eqn ( 6 . 1 0 ) .
explicit
I f t h i s e q u a t i o n i s changed t o
e n s u r e s e l f - a d j o i n t n e s s t h e n t h e Wheeler-DeWitt e q u a t i o n c h a n g e s and h e n c e
t h e c h o i c e o f measure and t h e n o t i o n o f s e l f a d j o i n t n e s s a l s o c h a n g e !
whole s i t u a t i o n i s c l e a r l y an e x t r e m e l y d e l i c a t e one which i s
in every r e s p e c t .
cro3s-coupled
In a d d i t i o n t h e r e i s no a p r i o r i r e a s o n why t h e t i m e
conventional
and i n f a c t w i t h t h e c h o i c e s o f c a n o n i c a l
variable
(i.e.
&
r a t h e r than ^
).
o r n o t t h e m e a s u r e c o n s t r u c t e d above l e a d s t o a c o n s e r v e d
density.
This
probability
A c o m p l e t e r e s o l u t i o n of t h i s c o m p l i c a t e d and i n t r i g u i n g problem
has n o t y e t been a c h i e v e d .
Any f u r t h e r t e c h n i c a l d i s c u s s i o n h e r e
is
problem.
63
if e i t h e r o f t h e s e two c a n o n i c a l q u a n t i s a t i o n s c h e m e s .
the nuperspuce approach,
For example i n
s u p e r s p a c e i t s e l l ' would be e x p e c t e d t o c o n t a i n
c e r t a i n b o u n d a r i e s which c o r r e a p o n d t o s i n g u l a r t h r e e g e o m e t r i e s .
In s o
f u n c t i o n a l in the v i c i n i t y of t h e s e s i n g u l a r geometries w i l l
pretiuniably d e t e r m i n e w h e t h e r o r n o t t h e c o l l a p s e d geometry e v e r o c c u r s .
I t h a s become customary i n t h e l i t e r a t u r e t o say t h a t t h e r e i s no c o l l a p s e
i f t h e wave f u n c t i o n a c t u a l l y v a n i s h e s on t h e boundary o f
but t h i s s t a t e m e n t n e e d s t o be i n t e r p r e t e d p r o p e r l y .
singularities
To i n v e s t i g a t e
th3
f u r t h e r i t i s c o n v e n i e n t t o g e n e r a l i s e t h e d i s c u s s i o n i n a way which
is
In any c a n o n i c a l a p p r o a c h which b e a r s t h e
slightest
r e s e m b l a n c e t o c o n v e n t i o n a l quantum t h e o r y t h e r e w i l l b e o b s e r v a b l e s
which a r e r e p r e s e n t e d by s e l f - a d j o i n t o p e r a t o r s d e f i n e d on t h e H i l b e r t
pace o f s t a t e s .
C l a s s i c a l l y t h e s e o b s e r v a b l e s w i l l t a k e on c e r t a i n
v a l u e s f o r t h e c o n f i g u r a t i o n o f t h e s y s t e m which c o r r e s p o n d s t o t h e
gravitationally collapsed s t a t e .
Indeed,
f o r some o f t h e
observables,
t h o s e v a l u e s (which may be i n f i n i t e ) w i l l p r o b a b l y be r e g a r d e d as b e i n g
the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of collapse.
which we w i l l c a l l f
By v i r t u e o f t h e s p e c t r a l t h e o r e m f o r s e l f -
original
)
which a r e
S t r i c t l y speaking, unless p
is
i s i t s e l f a complete
61
s e t of commuting o b s e r v a b l e s , t h e f u n c t i o n s a r e n o t r e a l v a l u e d , but
r a t h e r , elements of a general d i r e c t i n t e g r a l ,
v a l u e s in a l a r g e r 3 p a c e .
technical point,
and as such t a k e t h e i r
However, n e g l e c t i n g t h i s r e l a t i v e l y
unimportant
t h e i n t e g r a l o v e r a Borel s e t
(6.15)
t h e n t h e r e s u l t i n g v a l u e w i l l l i e i n B.
(In t h e g e n e r a l
c a s e t h e i n t e g r a l w i l l be o v e r t h e s p e c t r a o f a complete commuting s e t of
variables.)
We a r e p a r t i c u l a r l y i n t e r e s t e d in t h e c a s e in which B c o n t a i n s
t h e p o i n t o f t h e s p e c t r u m of P
singularity.
which c o r r e s p o n d s , c l a s s i c a l l y , t o t h e
I f t h e s i n g u l a r p o i n t i s an i s o l a t e d ,
d i s c r e t e p a r t of t h e
experience
(Or t o be more p r e c i s e ,
However, i f t h e
s i n g u l a r p o i n t b e l o n g s t o t h e c o n t i n u o u s p a r t of t h e spectrum t h e n t h e
v a n i s h i n g o f t h e wave f u n c t i o n a t t h a t p o i n t would n o t n e c e s s a r i l y have
any g r e a t s i g n i f i c a n c e .
point.
singular
g e o m e t r i e s (which in p r i n c i p l e could a r i s e e i t h e r as an a c t u a l
prediction
65
of t h e t h e o r y o r merely as a c o n s i s t e n t boundary c o n d i t i o n )
a f f e c t s t h i s b e h a v i o u r b u t i s c l e a r l y n o t t h e whole s t o r y .
certainly
This p r o b l e m ,
i m p o r t a n t one f o r r e s e a r c h .
7.
I t i s important t o
a p p r e c i a t e t h a t t h e t e c h n i q u e i s , i n p r i n c i p l e , a p p l i c a b l e t o any quantum
field theory.
To f o c u s a t t e n t i o n l e t us c o n s i d e r a s c a l a r f i e l d b e i n g
q u a n t i s e d in t h e f u n c t i o n a l r e p r e s e n t a t i o n and hence s a t i s f y i n g t h e
Schrodinger equation (see
51)
[(>; t]
or e q u i v a l e n t l y (see
(7.1)
1)
;t
H
a
V V ' ^
r-
with t h e a p p r o p r i a t e i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f
distribution
1,
"
i K
at
(7
as t h e p r o b a b i l i t y
f o r t h e measured v a l u e s of
Now i n c l a s s i c a l g e n e r a l r e l a t i v i t y a well-known t e c h n i q u e f o r
-2>
f i n d i n g e x a c t s o l u t i o n s of t h e E i n 3 t e i n e q u a t i o n s i s t o impose 3ome
symmetry on t h e m e t r i c .
A s i m i l a r p r o c e d u r e could b e f o l l o w e d t o f i n d
c l a s s i c a l s o l u t i o n s o f t h e s c a l a r f i e l d t h e o r y and would c o r r e s p o n d t o
s e t t i n g c e r t a i n of t h e modes q^ ( p o s s i b l y i n f i n i t e l y many) e q u a l t o z e r o .
The q u e s t i o n a r i s e s as t o w h e t h e r a s i m i l a r i d e a would work in t h e
case of t h e quantised t h e o r y .
In p a r t i c u l a r i f we remove a l l b u t t h e f i r s t n modes, s a y , t h e n
e q u a t i o n ( 7 . 2 ) becomes
' v v v ^ ' t ; - ^
* < v v v
t )
= i
< V V ' -
" *
<
t )
(7.3)
which i s a genuine p a r t i a l d i f f e r e n t i a l , r a t h e r t h a n f u n c t i o n a l e q u a t i o n .
U n f o r t u n a t e l y an e x a c t s o l u t i o n of t h e quantum f i e l d t h e o r y i s n o t o b t a i n e d
i n t h i s way b e c a u s e i n r e a l i t y t h e s u p p r e s s e d modes w i l l , a t t h e very
least,
undergo z e r o - p o i n t f l u c t u a t i o n s .
As a r e s u l t t h e above s t r u c t u r e
Namely:
I t may be p o s s i b l e t o show t h a t in c e r t a i n
physical
s i t u a t i o n s , c e r t a i n of t h e modes do dominate t h e o t h e r s
and as such eqn ( 7 - 3 ) i s a genuine a p p r o x i m a t i o n t o
reality.
title
In e f f e c t we a r e p e r t u r b i n g t h e number o f
d e g r e e s o f freedom n ( r a t h e r t h a n any c o u p l i n g c o n s t a n t s )
and a r e s a y i n g t h a t i n some s i t u a t i o n s t h i s i 3 a u s e f u l
t h i n g t o do.
Note t h a t t a k i n g t h e l i m i t n i n
(7.3)
67
13 a h i g h l y n o n - t r i v i a l t a s k .
Q u i t e a p a r t from t h e
t e c h n i c a l d i f f i c u l t i e s of s o l v i n g an n ' t h o r d e r p a r t i a l
d i f f e r e n t i a l e q u a t i o n , t h e d e l i c a t e problem of
inequivalent representations of the canonical
r e l a t i o n s o f i n f i n i t e l y many v a r i a b l e s w i l l
b r i n g i n g with i t the usual ' u l t r a v i o l e t
commutation
appear,
divergence'
d i f f i c u l t i e s o f quantum f i e l d t h e o r y ,
ii)
i f we
q u a n t i s e i n t h e n o n - c o v a r i a n t c a n o n i c a l scheme (5) t h e n
t h e o p e r a t o r o r d e r i n g problems can be d i s c u s s e d in a
s i m p l i f i e d form u s i n g one o f t h e s e m o d e l s ,
a s can t h e
coordinates
(A c a u t i o n a r y remark however - t h e r e s o l u t i o n of a
p a r t i c u l a r problem f o r f i n i t e n ,
even f o r a l l f i n i t e n ,
may n o t be r e l e v a n t when t h e l i m i t as n
is taken. )
As emphasised i n i t i a l l y t h e s e t e c h n i q u e s a r e in p r i n c i p l e
a p p l i c a b l e t o any f i e l d t h e o r y , b u t in p r a c t i c e t h e y only seem t o have
been used t o any e x t e n t in quantum g r a v i t y .
Each o f t h e d i f f e r e n t
approaches t o q u a n t i s i n g t h e g r a v i t a t i o n a l
f i e l d has a c o r r e s p o n d i n g
quantum model.
i)
For example:
True ( n o n - c o v a r i a n t ) c a n o n i c a l q u a n t i s a t i o n (55)
finishe3
c a n o n i c a l q u a n t i s a t i o n (6) t h e m a j o r
r e s u l t i s t h e WheeleiDeWitt e q u a t i o n
(7.M
(7-5)
superspace.
covariant
That
is,
69
space-based axiomatic f i e l d t h e o r y ,
u s e s quantum
fields',
roughly in t h e s e n s e of eqn ( 7 . 6 ) .
As t h e r e i s a c h a p t e r by M.MacCallum on t h e s u b j e c t of quantum
imology I w i l l n o t g i v e any d e t a i l s o f a c t u a l models h e r e .
It
(57)
are
The
mimy o t h e r s .
Let us conclude t h i s s e c t i o n by l i s t i n g some of t h e t y p e s of
problem which can be i n v e s t i g a t e d u s i n g quantum models.
1)
Conceptual problems a r e :
i)
t h e i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f t h e s t a t e v e c t o r and t h e d e f i n i t i o n
of o b s e r v a b l e s ;
ii)
t h e n o t i o n of p r o b a b i l i t y i n a c l o s e d u n i v e r s e ( t h i s
is
c l o s e l y l i n k e d t o t h e t e c h n i c a l problem o f d e f i n i n g a
Hilbert space s t r u c t u r e f o r t h e s t a t e
vectors);
and
iii)
t h e s i g n i f i c a n c e o f t h e p o s s i b i l i t y of t i m e b e i n g an
o p e r a t o r i n t h e s u p e r s p a c e approach o r e q u i v a l e n t l y of
d i f f e r e n t c l a s s i c a l l y chosen t i m e s b e i n g r e l a t e d by
q-number gauge t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s in t h e non c o v a r i a n t
c a n o n i c a l scheme.
7 0
2)
T e c h n i c a l problems a r e :
i)
t h e v a r i o u s o p e r a t o r o r d e r i n g problems which o c c u r ;
ii)
t h e dependence o f t h e quantum t h e o r y r e s u l t s on t h e
c h o i c e of c a n o n i c a l v a r i a b l e s a n d , i n t h e c a s e o f t h e
n o n - c o v a r i a n t c a n o n i c a l t h e o r y , on t h e v a r i a b l e s which
a r e e l i m i n a t e d from t h e c o n s t r a i n t e q u a t i o n s and t h e
c o o r d i n a t e c o n d i t i o n s which a r e imposed;
iii)
t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n of s e n s i b l e c r i t e r i a f o r t h e
existence
o r o t h e r w i s e of g r a v i t a t i o n a l c o l l a p s e in t h e quantum
t h e o r y ( c . f . t h e remarks a t t h e end of
iv)
6);
t h e n a t u r e of t h e t i m e - e v o l u t i o n e q u a t i o n
Schrodinger,
(viz.
from t h e s u p e r s p a c e t e c h n i q u e .
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Y.1
HKFKKKHCKS
FOR
51.
Dome r e c e n t review a r t i c l e s o f a g e n e r a l n a t u r e a r e :
(1)
D. B r i l l , R. Gowdy
(2)
C . J . Isham
Quantum G r a v i t y ICTP/72/8.
Imperial
C o l l e g e p r e p r i n t l e c t u r e n o t e s of t h e
1972 Boston c o n f e r e n c e .
An e a r l i e r
v e r s i o n appeared in t h e ' P r o c e e d i n g s of
t h e Seventh F i n n i s h Summer School i n
Physics 1972'.
Ed. R. P e l l i n e n
(3)
B.S. DeWitt
(li)
(1970)
( b u t mainly on
are:
J . A . Wheeler i n
(6)
Ed. C. DeWitt,
(7)
R. P e n r o s e i n
(8)
A s i m p l e b u t e l e g a n t d i s c u s s i o n f o r t h e two-
d i m e n s i o n a l c a s e i s given i n :
(9)
J - Glimm i n
'Mathemotics o f Contemporary
P h y s i c s ' Ed. R. S t r e a t e r Academic
P r e s s 1972
The s u b j e c t i s b e s t r e g a r d e d as p a r t o f t h e ( v e r y n o n - t r i v i a l )
t h e o r y o f r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s o f t h e c a n o n i c a l conmutation
general
relations.
A d i s c u s s i o n of t h i s t o p i c , w i t h an e x t e n s i v e b i b l i o g r a p h y , i s
contained
in:
(10)
G. Emch
' A l g e b r a i c Methods i n S t a t i s t i c a l
Mechanics and Quantum F i e l d Theory'
J . Wiley 1973
(11)
'The Many-Worlds I n t e r p r e t a t i o n of
Quantum M e c h a n i c s ' .
and N. Graham,
Princeton
University
P r e s s 1973
REFERENCES FOR 2.
Many o f t h e r e f e r e n c e s f o r t h i s s e c t i o n a r e r e l e v a n t a l s o f o r 3 and
vice versa.
A g e n e r a l d i s c u s s i o n of t h e problems i n v o l v e d i n q u a n t i s i n g
S. F u l l i n g
Princeton Thesis
(1972)
and
(13)
S. F u l l i n g
73
Some r e f e r e n c e s f o r t h e g e n e r a l
1 of p a r t i c l e production
(lb)
L. P u r k e r
Phys. Rev.
(15)
(16)
P. McCarthy
(17)
S.W. Hawking
ore:
3^6 (1971)
Some s i m i l a r r e s u l t s a r e c o n t a i n e d
in:
'Second Q u a n t i s a t i o n in t h e Kerr
(18)
W.G. Unruh
M e t r i c ' Berkely p r e p r i n t 197^
To appear
(19)
L. Ford
REFERENCES FOR 5 3.
A l l o f t h e r e f e r e n c e s f o r 2 are r e l e v a n t f o r t h i s
(20)
C. M o l l e r in
section.
'Les T h e o r i e s R e l a t i v i s t e s de l a
G r a v i t a t i o n ' CNRS 1962
(21)
S. B o n a z z o l a , F. P a c i n i
(22)
R. R u f f i n i , S. Bonazzola
(23)
(2li)
(25)
J . 0. T a y l o r , P. Pandya
To appear
(26)
Vi.
(27)
L. P a r k e r , S.A. F u l l i n g
P h y s . Rev. D 8 2 357 ( 1 9 7 3 )
REFERENCES FOR lt
(28)
B . S . DeWitt
W.H.
(1972)
Ed. B . S .
D e W i t t , C. D e W i t t , B l a c k i e 1963
(29)
R. Feynman
A c t a P h y s i c a P o l o n i c a XXIV
(30)
S.
(31)
L. F a d e e v , V. Popov
Gupta
697 (1963)
' P e r t u r b a t i o n T h e o r y f o r Gauge
I n v a r i a n t F i e l d s ' NAL. t r a n s .
HAL-THY-57 (1972)
(32)
See M. D u f f ' s c h a p t e r f o r a c o m p r e h e n s i v e b i b l i o g r a p h y o f t h e
work on d i m e n s i o n a l r g u l a r i s a t i o n
g r a v i t y i n t h e form o f o n e - l o o p
(33)
C.J.
recent
and i t s a p p l i c a t i o n t o quantum
calculations.
I s h a m , Abdus S a l a m , J . S t r a t h d e e
Some o t h e r a p p r o a c h e s t o c o v a r i a n t q u a n t i s a t i o n can be f o u n d i n :
(3>i)
J . Schwinger
(35)
S. Mandlestam
P h y s . Rev.
5 1580 (1968)
P h y s . Rev.
5 160I4 ( 1 9 6 8 )
(36)
M. F l a t o , J . Simon
7 5
L. R o s e n f e l d
Ann. Physik
Z. Phyaik
113
(1930)
65. 589
(1930)
integral
io:
(38)
HKFKRKHCES FOR 5
Most of t h e r e f e r e n c e s in t h i s s e c t i o n a r e r e l e v a n t f o r 6 and v i c e v e r s a .
(39)
P.A.M. D i r a c
(liO)
7^5 (1959)
K. Kuchar
' C a n o n i c a l Q u a n t i s a t i o n of
G r a v i t y ' P r i n c e t o n P r e p r i n t 1972
Phys. Rev. lA U (1971)
(I|2)
J . York
(Ii3)
M. Russo, R. Arnowitt
76
REFERENCES TOR 6.
Some r e l a t i v e l y e a r l y g e n e r a l p a p e r s on t h i s a p p r o a c h
are:
(IjU)
J . L . Anderson
(1*5)
B . S . DeWitt
(16)
J . L . Anderson
P h y s . Rev. l l U U 1182 ( 1 9 5 9 )
'q-number Co-ordinate
T r a n s f o r m a t i o n s and t h e
O r d e r i n g Problem i n G e n e r a l
Relativity'
(Unidentified
reprint)
The i d e a o f s u p e r s p a c e q u a n t i s a t i o n a r o s e from v a r i o u s s o u r c e s .
t h e s e was a c a r e f u l i n v e s t i g a t i o n o f t h e H a m i l t o n - J a c o b i
One o f
equation:
(1j7)
A. P e r e s
Nuovo. Cim
26 53 ( 1 9 6 2 )
(1.8)
P. Bergmann
( 19)
A. Komar
See a l s o i n t h i s
6 1521 (1970)
P h y s . Rev. DU J 923
(1971)
J o u r . Math. P h y s .
5 (1972)
context:
(50)
K. Kuchar
(52)
J . W h e e l e r ( w i t h R . F . B a i e r l e i n and D.M. s h a r p )
P h y s . Rev. 126 5 186U (1962)
(53)
P.W. Higgs
P h y s . Rev. L e t t s .
1 373 ( 1 9 5 8 )
P h y s . Rev. L e t t s . 2
(5U)
A. F i s c h e r i n ' R e l a t i v i t y '
Ed. C a r m e l i e t a l .
66 (1959)
Plenum 1970.
77
(55)
U. Gerlach
A. P e r e s
V. Moncrief
Phys. Rev.
V. M o n c r i e f , C. T e i t e l b o i m
C. T e i t l e b o i m
'How Commutators o f C o n s t r a i n t s
277 (1972)
R e f l e c t t h e Space-time S t r u c t u r e '
Princeton preprint
D. C h n s t o d o u l o u
(1972)
(1972)
(1972)
'Geometrodynamics Regained - A
Lagrangian Approach'
of Utah p r e p r i n t
University
(1973)
REFERENCES FOR 7
(57)
C.W. Misner
(58)