Cdna07047enc 001 Indice

TRANSACTIONS
of the
5th International Conference on
STRUCTURAL
MECHANICS
IN REACTUR
TECHNOLOGY
International Congress Center Berlin
Berlin, Germany" 1317 August 1979
Transaction General Editors:
Thomas A. JAEGER Bruno A. BOLEY
Vol.
A . Introduction
General Contents
Authors Index
Conference organization by:
International Association for Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology
Commission of the European Communities, Brussels

n cooperation with:
Bundesanstalt fr M aterialprfung ( B A M ) , Berlin
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C.

NORTHHOLLAND PUBLISH ING COMPANY
for
THE COMMISSION OF TH E EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
PATRONAGE
The 5th SMiRT Conference and its associated Pre- and PostConference Seminars are under the patronage of
Dr. Guido BRUNNER
Member of the Commission of the European
Communities
CONFERENCE ORGANISATION BY:

International Association for Structural Mechanics
in Reactor Technology e. V., and
Bundesanstalt fr Materialprfung (BAM), Berlin
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, D.C.
in cooperation
with:
Bechtel Power Corp.. San Francisco/Los Angeles. Cal., U.S.A.
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). Palo Alto. Cal.. U.S.A.
Franklin Research Center (FRO, Philadelphia, Pa., U.S.A.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, U.S.A.
Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, U.S.A.
MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation, Los Angeles, Cal., U.S.A.
Associated Nuclear Services. Epsom, Surrey, United Kingdom
CO-SPONSORING INSTITUTIONS AND SOCIETIES

American Academy of Mechanics
American Nuclear Society (ANS)
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, U.S.A.
Brookhaven National Laboratory. Upton, New York, U.S.A.
Canadian Nuclear Association
Gesellschaft fr Reaktorsicherheit mbH. Kln. Fed. Rep. Germany
Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, California. U.S.A.
Office of Naval Research (ONR)
Society of Engineering Science
GENERAL
SUPPORT
Senate of the City of Berlin
STRUCTURAL
IN REAGTUR
TECHNOLOGY
Vol.
A. Introduction
General Contents
Authors Index
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Thomas A. JAEGER, General Chairman, Scientific Chairman
and Organization Chairman
Direktor und Professor, Bundesanstalt fr Materialprfung
D-1000 Berlin (West) 45. Germany
Bruno A. BOLEY, Scientific Chairman and

Deputy General Chairman
Dean. The Technological Institute. Northwestern University
Evanston. Illinois 60201, U S A .
Raymond K. APPLEYARD, C.E.C. Representative

Director General. Directorate-General 'Scientific and Technical Information
and Information Management' (O.G. XIII)
Commission of the European Communities. Brussels, Belgium
F. CACCIA-DOMINIONI, C.E.C. Representative

Director, Research. Development and Nuclear Policy Directorate,
Directorate-General 'Research. Science and Education' (D.G. XII)
Commission of the European Communities, Brussels. Belgium
John M. GIBB, Secretary of Executive Committee

Head. Department for Dissemination of Research Results. Luxembourg,
Directorate-General 'Scientific and Technical Information and Information
Management' (DG. XIII)
Commission of the European Communities. Brussels. Belgium
Robert AVERY
Director. Reactor Analysis and Safety Division,
Argonne National Laboratory. Argonne, Illinois 60439. U.S.A.
Franklin E. COFFMAN
Acting Director. Division of Development and Technology.
Office of Fusion Energy. United States Department of Energy.
Washington. D.C. 20545, U.S.A.
Lawrence C. SHAO. U.S.N.R.C. Representative

Director, Division of Reactor Safety Research. United States
Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Washington. D C . 20555. U S A .
Jean RASTOIN, SMiRT-6 General Chairman

Chef Dpartement des tudes Mcaniques et Thermiques.
Commissariat l'nergie Atomique. Centre d'tudes Nuclaires
de Saclay. Gif-sur-Yvette. France
PUBLICATION MANAGEMENT
Mme. J. STALPAERT,
Commission of the European Communities, Directorate-General 'Scientific
and Technical Information and Information Management' (D.G. XIII)
Department for Dissemination of Research Results. Luxembourg
TRANSACTIONS
of the
5th International Conference on
STRUCTURAL
MECHANICS
IN REACTUR
TECHNOLOGY
International Congress Center Berlin
Berlin, Germany" 1317 August 1979
Transaction General Editors:
Thomas A. JAEGER Bruno A. BOLEY
Conference organization b y :
International Association for Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology

n cooperation with:
Bundesanstalt fr M aterialprfung (BAM ), Berlin
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C.
General Chairman:
Dep.
Thomas A. JAEGER
Bundesanstalt fr Material
prfung, Berlin, Germany
Gen. Chairman: Bruno A. BOLEY
Scientific Chairmen:
Tilomas A. JAEGER
Organization Chairman:
Thomas A. JAEGER
Bruno A. BOLEY
Northwestern University,
Evanston, Illinois, U.SA
NORTHHOLLAND PUBLISH ING COMPANY

for
THE COMMISSION OF TH E EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
Published by
NORTH-HOLLAND PUBLISHING COMPANY AMSTERDAM
NORTH-HOLLAND PUBLISHING COMPANY OXFORD
for
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
DIRECTORATE GENERAL SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL
INFORMATION AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
Sole distributors for the U.SA and Canada:
ELSEVIER NORTH-HOLLAND INC.
52 Vanderbilt Avenue
New York, N.Y. 10017
North-Holland ISBN for this volume: 0 4 4 4 8 5 3 5 7
North-Holland ISBN for the set: 0 4 4 4 8 5 3 5 6 1
LEGAL NOTICE
The Commission of the European Communities is not responsible for the use which could be made
of the following information.
Copyright CECA, CEE, CEEA Luxembourg, 1979
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system,
or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or
otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner.
CONTENTS
Foreword
Guido BRUNNER Member of the Commission of the

European Communities
Welcome Address
Dietrich STOBBE Regierender Brgermeister von Berlin
Preface
Thomas A. JAEGER General Chairman
Bruno . BOLEY S cientific Chairman
11
Topical S cope of the Conference
15
Topical Grouping of the Conference S essions
17
Table of Contents
21
Authors Index
103
FOREWORD
This International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Tech

nology is the fifth of a series which started in 1971 in Berlin. Thus, with
SMiRT5 the series is as it were, coming home again, and I should like
to thank the Senate of the City of Berlin for acting as host once
more.
The Conferences have throughout been truly international bringing togeth
er participants from some 30 countries. This is a reflection of the
worldwide significance of the problems on which they have focussed;
many of these problems are not just technological, they are also of
direct relevance to nuclear safety. I am particularly glad that such issues
are being discussed both thoroughly and openly.
SMiRT5 will include in its program for the first time a division on the
structural mechanics problems of fusion reactor plants. This is a sign of
the times, it is a sign of the determination of a world dependent on
energy for its economic and social development to free itself from the
menace of shortage which goes with reliance on conventional sources.
Quite generally, in a world which relies more and more on the optimal
application of hardlywon knowledge it is conferences like SMiRT5
which foster the exchange of many diverse experiences; they are not
only themselves large clubs but give rise to more and more specialized
informal groups as can be seen from the present draft program.
H^-ct^
{_^\&^~
Guido Brunner
Member of the Commission of the European Communities
WELCOME ADDRESS
Berlin is increasingly consolidating and extending its position as an international convention city the International Congress Center is our
contribution to this top rank.
But we do not merely want to strengthen further Berlin's world-wide
reputation as a place of meeting and contact. Our efforts are also aimed
to make Berlin even more a focus of research.
The 5th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor
Technology taking place here is a convention whose goals are to contribute both towards the further development of nuclear energy and
towards ensuring the maximum degree of safety. It is, consequently,
concerned with problems which are of particular interest to the industrialised countries and which, moreover, affect all of us. From production
of energy to the economic essentials of our well-being I wish the
Conference every success.
As Governing Mayor of the City of Berlin I extend a cordial welcome to
the participants of the 5th SMiRT Conference who come to Berlin from
all over the world, and I hope that your papers and seminars and
discussions will provide a great deal of inspiration and impetus. I also
hope that beside of your work some time will remain for you to get to
know our city.
Dietrich Stobbe
Regierender Brgermeister von Berlin
Bruno A. BOLEY
Scientific Chairman
10
and
Thomas A. JAEGER
General Chairman
PREFACE
Reactor Technology and Structural Mechanics
Reactor Technology requires a synthesis of many skills. The ability to solve
the structural mechanics problems encountered is of vital importance for
achieving economic, reliable and safe exploitation of nuclear power.
The rapid development of reactor technology has given rise to a multitude of
problems in the area of structural mechanics, problems which arise from a
diversity of new materials used for the different reactor system components
operating under severe environmental conditions and postulated loading. Further impetus for improved technology stems from the great emphasis that
must be placed on considerations of reactor safety; here again the role of
structural mechanics is paramount.
The unprecedented combination of mechanical and structural requirements
posed by reactor technology represent at one and the same time a great
challenge and a great stimulus to the field of structural mechanics. Structural
mechanics has thus been forced to develop rapidly, not only in the area of
analysis coupled with complex laws of materials, but also in the related
disciplines of computer methods and quality control. Great advances have
been made during the past decade, but severe problems still lie ahead.
The solution of special problems of reactor technology provides one of
today's most important influxes of basic enrichment and inspiration in the
general field of structural mechanics. We have already noted that the answer
to many considerations of reactor safety undoubtedly lies within the realm of
structural mechanics. The words of Dr. Altiero Spinelli, of the Commission of
the European Communities, in the Foreword to the Proceedings of the First
SMiRT Conference, are valid today with undiminished force: "Structural
mechanics are at the very centre of nuclear technology, because it is the safe,
reliable structure that counts. The major problems in building today's reactors
and developing tomorrow's are mechanical and structural."
Purpose and Scope of the Conference

The biennial International Conferences on Structural Mechanics in Reactor
Technology aim at bringing together engineers and scientists who are actively
engaged in solving structural mechanics problems in the field of reactor
technology with fundamentalists in the general field of engineering mechanics.
Thus, both applied and fundamental papers on structural mechanics
problems in reactor technology are presented and discussed for the benefit of
both reactor technology and of structural mechanics science.
Since the basic concept of the SMiRT-Conferences did prove its vitality and
adaptability to the changing needs of the field, we should like to restate it
11
from the Opening Address of the 1st SMiRT Conference (Proceedings of the
1st SMiRT-Conference, Vol. 1, Part A):
The SMiRT-Conferences have been designed for a type of multi-dimensional
communication.
First of all, the specialist can communicate with experts in his own field. This
is the usual linear dimension of topical meetings.
The second dimension of this meeting extends across the boundaries of the
technical fields and should initiate a cross-fertilizing of the different technological disciplines involved.
The third dimension of the Conference results from its bringing together
mechanical and structural engineers with fundamental research workers in the
general field of engineering mechanics.
Due to the truly international character of this meeting there is also a fourth
dimension of communication across the boundaries of countries.
The 1st and 2nd SMiRT Conferences, held in Berlin in 1971 and 1973, the 3rd
SMiRT Conference, held in London in 1975, and the 4th SMiRT Conference,
held in San Francisco in 1977, provided a most useful meeting ground for
reactor technologists, mechanical and civil structural engineers, and engineering mechanics scientists from all over the world. The 5th SMiRT Conference
maintains the high level of contribution from engineers and researchers from
all over the world, and is instrumental in increasing the interaction among
fundamental and applied workers in this vital field.
The broad field of structural mechanics in reactor technology has been subdivided, as in the previous SMiRT Conferences, into topical divisions. In this
Conference, each of these has been organized by two Division Coordinators,
whose individual and collective efforts have played an essential part in the
shaping of the Conference programs. Each Division contains a Principal Lecture, highlighting the present state of the field and pointing the way to possible
future developments.
SMiRT-5 includes a new division dealing with foreseeable thermal, materials
engineering and structural mechanics problems of future fusion reactor power
plants.
Acknowledgements
Many persons who have worked so hard in the planning and organization to
make this Conference a success would deserve acknowledgement. But it is
not possible here to mention all of these persons by name. There are, however, a few people who should be mentioned individually for their outstanding
work.
The Transactions of the Conference have once again been produced by the
Directorate-General for Scientific and Technical Information and Information
12
Management of the Commission of the European Communities. Special

thanks go to Mme. J. Stalpaert of this DirectorateGeneral, who acted in the
capacity of Publication Manager and has accomplished the monumental task
of assembling, printing and distributing in time the SMiRT5 Transactions.
We are grateful to the several cosponsoring and cooperating organizations
and societies for their extremely important cooperation.
In addition, the Conference organizers are grateful to Mrs. G. Gill of the
Bundesanstalt fr Materialprfung, Berlin, who served as Secretary to the
General Chairman and Scientific Chairman, to Mrs. E. Warren Secretary to the
Deputy General Chairman and to Mrs. E. Kleversaat of the Department of
Organization and Operation, International Congress Center Berlin, for their
capable and devoted efforts at all stages of the Conference organization.
We are sure that the present Conference will form a memorable link in the
chain of SMiRT Conferences, and wish to extend our thanks to all authors
and participants, and to all those who have helped so much in the long
months of planning, for their unflagging support and assistance.
h
Thomas A. JAEGER
General Chairman
SJ\tuu> *
Bruno A. BOLEY
Scientific Chairman
13
REACTOR TECHNOLOGY
REACTOR COMPONENTS
Solutions for Special Problems
M A T H E M A T I C A L MODELS
OF M A T E R I A L S BEH AVIOR
GEOMETRICAL
IDEALIZATION
REACTOR M A T E R I A L S
IECHANICAL/THERMAL
B O U N D A R Y & SOURCE
CONDITIONS
REACTOR CORE: NUCLEAR COMPONENTS

Basic Components of Fui
os
REACTOR CORE: S T R U C T U R A L COMPONENTS
Fuel Element Assemblies.
NUCLEAR M A T E R I A L S
Metals
Ceram
Cermeti
PRIMARY COOLANT CIRCUIT STRUCTURES

Piping, Junctions. Bellows;
STRUCTURAL M A T E R I A L S
Metals
Ceramics
Concrete
8
PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE
TOPICAL SCOPE OF THE CONFERENCE

The topical scope of the Conference is outlined in the following and a graphical display of the topical scope is given on page 14.
The Conference contains presentations on all aspects of engineering mechanics and nuclear (fission and fusion) reactor engineering having direct bearing
on the analysis, design, reliability and generally on the safety of power reactor
mechanical and structural components and systems.
The papers may be theoretical or experimental, applied or fundamental in
scope, or a combination of these indeed; one of the aims of the Conference is
to bring together results of investigations of various types towards an improved integration of technical state of the field.
More particularly, the following topics will be covered in detail:
Structural Analysis of Fission Reactor and Fusion Reactor Components
The main topics of the Conference are theoretical developments and combined
experimental theoretical studies:
for the analysis of stress, deformation, stability, and limit load of all kinds
of nuclear reactor components and associated equipment (e.g., reactor fuel
elements, solid moderators, reactor core support structures, reactor vessels
and piping, reactor containment shells) on the basis of the theories of
(thermotelasticity, (thermo)plasticity, (thermo)visco-elasticity, and limit
load;
for the analysis of stress and strain under mechanical and thermal cycling
conditions (shake down and low-cycle fatigue);
for the analysis of crack propagation and fracture in reactor fuel elements
and reactor pressure vessels;
for the dynamic structural analysis of vibrational and shock response behavior of fuel element assemblies and other reactor structures, induced by
internal conditions (hydraulic flow, pressure pulses, neutron pulses, thermal
shock) and general loads encountered in accident conditions, and by external conditions such as seismic forces and ship motion;
for the analysis of interactions of thermodynamic and fluid dynamics

phenomena with mechanical behavior of reactor components;
for the analysis of the influence of structural characteristics on the performance and selection of major dynamic components in reactors;
for the structural mechanics analysis of first wall structures and magnet
structures for future fusion reactor power plants.
Mathematical-Physical Characterization of Materials

Consolidation of available experimental knowledge of the behavior of reactor
fuel materials by solid mechanics hypotheses related to their microstructures.
15
Studies on influences of the micro-structure and of micromechanical changes

under environmental conditions and time upon the macroscopic behavior
under mechanical and thermal loading. Special topics are (e.g.): microstructure
and mechanical properties; continuum models for nuclear fuel materials;
rheological behavior laws of structural metals at high temperatures; and
fracture mechanics of pressure vessel steels.
Boundary Fields
Tangential areas rendering the mechanical/thermal boundary and source
conditions are within the scope of the Conference: Radiation induced heat
generation and heat conduction in solid bodies; and fluid dynamics phenomena with interactive coupling with mechanical behavior of reactor components.
Computer Methods in Solid and Structural Mechanics
Besides the application of analytic and numerical techniques to special
problems of structural analysis of reactor components, consideration will also
be given to those fundamental theoretical treatments of modern topics in
engineering mechanics which are of basic potential interest for solving
complex problems arising in nuclear reactor design. Special emphasis will be
on modern computer methods in solid and structural mechanics.
Interaction Between Structural Mechanics Science
and Practical Engineering
Particular emphasis will be placed on investigations which show (1) how
various theoretical analyses are actually incorporated into existing design
procedures and (2) how the predictions from the various design procedures
correlate with actual reactor experience. (This is closely related to the topic of
reliability analysis of mechanical reactor components and systems.)
Design Conditions; Reliability of Mechanical Systems
Probabilistic methods and statistics as applied to structural analysis and safety
assessment of mechanical and structural reactor components and systems.
This includes reactor internals, reactor vessels and primary circuit, and engineered safeguards including containment. Within-the scope of the topic is the
specification of reasonable ways of defining, arriving at, and specifying design
load conditions (operational and failure) on mechanical and structural reactor
components.
Analysis of the interrelationship of thermal and structural design factors will
be directed towards materials selection criteria concerning high-temperature
materials technology in nuclear applications.
16
SMiRT-5 SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM

TOPICAL GROUPING OF THE
CONFERENCE SESSIONS
Division .
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Thermal and Fluid/Structure Dynamics Analysis

Computational Methods I
Computational Methods II
Computational Methods III
Acoustic Methods
Flow Induced Vibrations
PWR Problems
BWR Problems I
BWR Problems II
Division C.
Analysis of Reactor Fuel and Cladding Materials

Fuel and Fission Product Behavior I
Fuel and Fission Product Behavior II
Graphite Fuels Analysis
Cladding Materials Behavior I
Cladding Materials Behavior II
Failure Criteria I
Failure Criteria II
C1|.
C1||.
C 2.
C3|.
C3||.
C 4,.
C4.
Division D.
D1.
D 2.
D 3.
D 4.
D 5.
D 6.
D 7.
Division E.
E 1.
E 2.
E 3.
E 4.
E 5.
E 6.
Structural Analysis of
Reactor Fuel Elements and Assemblies
Fuel Performance Analysis
Pellet-Clad Interaction Effects on Clad Behavior
Methods for Analysis for Pellet-Clad Interaction
Thermal Reactor Subassembly Analysis
Fast Reactor Subassembly Analysis
Accident and Overpower Transient Analysis of
Thermal Reactors
Accident and Overpower Transient Analysis of Fast
Reactors
Energetics and Structural Dynamics in Fast
Reactor Accident Analysis
HCDA Containment
Upper Core Structures and Coper Response
Coolant Systems and Materials Response
Experiments and Code Verification I
Experiments and Code Verification II
Core Components Response
17
Division F.
F1.
F 2.
F 3.
F 4.
F 5.
F 6.
F 7.
F 8.
F 9.
Division G.
G 1.
G 2.
G 3.
G 4.
G 5.
G 6.
G 7.
G 8.
G 9.
G 10
Division H.
H1.
H 2.
H 3.
H 4.
H 5.
H 6.
H 7.
H 8.
18
Structural Analysis of Reactor Core and Coolant

Circuit Structures
Reactor Core Structures
Special Problems
Piping: Structural Analysi s
Piping: Dynami c Analysi s
Fracture Mechani cs
Pipe Rupture
Pipe Rupture: Methodology
Components and Support Systems
Heat Exchangers
Structural An alysis of Steel Reactor Pressure
Vessels
Overviews of Integri ty Assessment
Fracture Toughness Measurements
Fracture Mechani cs: "lasto-Plastic
Fracture Mechani cs: Speci al Aspects
Fracture Mechani cs: Stable Crack Growth
Fracture Mechani cs: Materi als Modeli ng
Fracture Mechani cs: Computati on
Fatigue
Fracture Mechani cs: Thermal Effects
Stress Analysi s
Structural Engineering of Prestressed
Reactor Pressure Vessels
Materials Behavi or
Materials Behavi or II
Design, Research and Survei llance of PCVs
Structural Analysi s of PCVs and Components
Liner and Thermal Barri er Systems
Concept and Research for a PCV
with Hot Li ner
Concept and Research for a PCIV
Concept and Research for a PCV for the LMFBR
Division J.
Loading Conditions and

Structural Analysis of Reactor Containment
J 1. General Design Criteria and Containment
Selection
J 2. BWR Containment Design
J 3. Concrete Containment Design and Analysis
J 4. Concrete Containment: Testing Behavior
J 5. Design and Analysis of Slabs and Structures
J 6. Structural and Leak Testing
and Design of Containment Components
J 7. Impact Load Analysis and Design I
J 8. Impact Load Analysis and Desiqn II
J 9. Aircraft Impact Load
J 10. Impulsive Load Analysis and Design
Division K.
Seismic Response Analysis of Nuclear Power

Plant Systems
K 1. Ground Motion
K 2. Risk Analysis I
K 3. Risk Analysis II
K 4. Design Concepts
K 5. Soil-Structure Interaction
K 6. Soil-Structure Interaction II
K 7. Underground Structures
K 8. Response of Structures
K 9. Floor Response Analysis
K 10. Response of Piping and Equipment I
K 11. Response of Piping and Equipment II
K 12|. Reactor Core and Fluid Related Structures I
K 12||. Reactor Core and Fluid Related Structures II
K 13|. Dynamic Testing and Qualification I
K 13ii. Dynamic Testing and Qualification II
Panel Session
JK-P
Division L.
L 1.
L 2.
L 3.
L4.
L 5.
L 6.
L 7.
L 8.
L 9.
L 10.
L11.
L 12.
L 13.
Status of Research in Structural and

Mechanical Engineering for Nuclear Power Plants
Materials Modeling and Inelastic Analysis
of Metal Structures
Advanced Theories I
Advanced Theories II
Methods I
Methods II
Fracture, Rupture
Codes and Criteria
Materials Behavior
Applications I
Applications II
Simplified Methods
Damage
Experiments I
Experiments II
Division M.
Methods for Structural Analysis
M 1. Integrated Methods of Structural Analysis
M 2. Numerical Implementation of Inelastic Material
Models
M 3. Design and Simplified Methods of Analysis
M 4. Computational Techniques for Plate and Shell
Analysis I
M 5. Computational Techniques for Plate and Shell
Analysis II
M 6. Computational Techniques within Finite Element
Analysis I
M 7. Computational Techniques within Finite Element
Analysis II
M 8. Probabilistic Methods in Structural Analysis
M 9. Numerical Procedures for Fracture Mechanics
M 10. Dynamic Modeling in Seismic Analysis
M 11. Advances in Linear Boundary and Initial Value
Problems
Division N.
Thermal, Materials Engineering, and Structural

Mechanics Problems of Future Fusion Reactor
Power Plants
N.
Part I.Engineering Concepts and Thermo-FluidDynamics of Future Fusion Reactor Power Plants
N 1.1 Engineering Concepts of Magnetic Confinement
Fusion Reactor Systems
N 1.2 Engineering Concepts of Inertial Confinement and
Hybrid Fusion Reactor Systems and Safety
Considerations
N 1.3 Thermal-Fluid Dynamics of Fusion Power Reactor
Systems
N.
Part2.Structural Mechanics Problems of Fusion Power
Reactors
N 2.1
N 2.2
N 2.3
N 2.4
N 2.5
20
Structural Analysis of Magnets

Magnet Technology
First Wall Performance in Fusion Reactors
Fusion Blanket Structural Analysis
Materials and Plasma-Fluid Wall Interaction
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Division . THERMAL AND FLUID/STRUCTURE DYNAMICS
ANALYSIS
Session 1. Computational Methods I
1/1* Evaluation of Lagrangian, Eulerian, Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian

Methods for Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems in HCDA Analy
sis
Y.W. Chang, H.Y. Chu, J. Gvildys, C.Y. Wang, Argonne National La
boratory, Argonne, Illinois, U.S.A.
1/2 Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian Finite-Element Descriptions with
Particular Reference to Incompressible Viscous Flows
T.J.R. Hughes, W.K. Liu, T.K. Zimmermann, California Institute of
Technology, Pasadena, California, U.SA.
1/3 An Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian Finite Element Procedure for
Transient Dynamic Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems
J. Donea, P. Fasoli-Stella, S. Giuliani, J.P. Halleux, A.V. Jones,
Commission of the European Communities, J.R.C. Ispra Esta
blishment, Ispra, Italy
1/4
Quasi-Eulerian Finite Element Formulation for Fluid-Structure
T.B. Belytschko, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
J.M. Kennedy, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois
D.F. Schoeberle, University of Illinois at Chicago Circle, Chicago,
Illinois, U.SA.
1 /5
1/6
1/7
1/8
Coupled Fluid-Structure Method for Pressure Suppression Anal

ysis
W.H. McMaster, D.M. Norris, Jr., G.L. Goudreau, Lawrence Liver
more Laboratory, Livermore, California, U.S.A.
Dynamic Fluid-Structure Analysis of Shells Using the PISCES 2
DELK Computer Code
M.S. Cowler, S.L. Hancock, Physics International Company, San
Leandro, Califcrnia, U.S.A.
Calculation of Fluid-Structure Interaction for Reactor Safety with
the Cassiopee Code
J.L. Graveleau, C.E.A./DRNR-SEDC, St. Paul-lez-Durance,
P. Louvet, CISI, St. Paul-lez-Durance, France
An Eulerian Formulation of Fluid-Structure Interaction in Reactor
Containment System
C.Y. Wang, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois,
USA.
Notes: The sign {*) designates Invited Lectures.

A title mentioned on the Table of Contents but not followed by a summary or a paper means that the paper
was not available at the time of finishing of the book.
A paper number missing in the numeral order means that the paper was cancelled or withdrawn.
21
Session 2. Computational M ethods II

2/1 * A ThreeDimensional FiniteElement Formulation for FluidStruc
ture Interaction
R.F. Kulak, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, U.S .A.
2/3 ThermoMechanical Analysis of Depressurization
A. H uber, H . H ofmann, S DK Ingenieurunternehmen GmbH, Lr
rach, Fed. Rep. Germany
2/4
Formation of LOCA Jets and Induced Flows During Water
Clearing
C K Chu, TT. Lee, Burns S t Roe, Inc., Woodbury, . Y.,
H.C. Lui, Columbia University, New York, N.Y., U.S .A.
2/5 Calculation of the Loads Induced by Pressure WaveFlow in
Branched Piping in Interaction to Valve Closing Behavior
M. Fautz, Kraftwerk Union AG, Offenbach, Fed. Rep. Germany
2/6
Reflection and Transmission of Fluid Transients at an Elbow
R.A. Valentin, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois,
J.W. Phillips, J.S. Walker, University of Illinois at UrbanaCham
paign. Urbana, Illinois, US A.
2/8
PLEXUS: A General Computer Code for Explicit Lagrangian Com

putation
C. Chavant, CIS I, GifsurYvette,
A. H offmann, P. Verpeaux, CEA/CENDEMT, S aclay, Gifsur
Yvette,
J. Dubois, Engineering S ystems International S .A., RungisS ilic,
France
Session 3. Computational Methods III

3/1 * Finite Element Solution to Transient ConvectiveConductive H eat
Transfer Problems
J. Donea, S. Giuliani, Commission of the European Communities,
J.R.C., Ispra Establishment, Ispra,
L. Quartapelle, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
3/2 Thermal Analysis of the Penetrations of a LMFBR
S. Goldstein, J. Joly, CEA/CENDEMT, S aclay, GifsurYvette,
M. Vidard, C.EA.C.E.N. Cadarache, S t.PaullezDurance,
France
3/2a Thermal Analysis of Guarded Penetration Assemblies in a Reactor
Containment and Cooling Coil Requirements
D.T. Ramani, A. Dimopoulos, Y.A. Patel, R.D. Raheja, Sargent and
Lundy Engineers, Chicago, Illinois, U.S .A.
3/3
Numerical Analysis of H eat Transfer in a Fluid/Solid Coupled
System
C. Taylor, University College of S wansea, Swansea, U.K.,
3/4 Spectral Decomposition in Nonlinear Transient Heat Transfer Ana
lysis
M.A. H ogge, Universit de Lige, Lige, Belgium
22
3/5
A General Formulation of the Isotherm Migration Method for Reac

tor Accident Analysis
B.D. Turland, U.K.A.E.A., Culham Laboratory, Abingdon, Oxon,
U.K.
3/7
Effectiveness of Simple Computational Schemes for Transient
Temperature Distributions in Structural Components
K.R. Leimbach, Consultant, BochumLinden,
V.H. Engelke, Kraftwerk Union AG, Offenbach, Fed. Rep. Germany
3/8 A Finite Element Model for FluidStructure Interaction Studies
A.N. Nahavandi, Columbia University, New York, N.Y., U.S .A.
3/9
Difference Analysis for FluidStructure Interaction
E. Giencke, M. Forkel, Technische Universitt Berlin, Berlin, Ger
many
3/10 Theoretical and Experimental Study of the Unsteady Flow Through
Perforated Structures
J.J. Smolderen, G. Liebecq, W. Kollmann, Von Karman Institute for
Fluid Dynamics, RhodeStGense, Belgium,
H. Holtbecker, Commission of the European Communities, J.R.C.
Ispra Establishment, Ispra, Italy
Session 4. Acoustic M ethods

4/1 *
4/2
4/3
4/4
4/5
4/6
Description of a General Method to Compute the Fluid

Structure Interaction
F. Jeanpierre, R.J. Gibert, A. H offmann, M. Livolant. CEA/CEAV
DEMT, S aclay, GifsurYvette, France
Finite Element Analysis of FluidStructure Interaction Problems
B. Osterie, W.Ch. Muller, Gesellschaft fr Reaktorsicherheit, Gar
ching, Fed. Rep. Germany
Analyses of the Dynamic Behavior of Nuclear Power Reactor Com
ponents Containing Fluid
F. Descleve, NOVATOME Industries, Le Plessis Robinson,
J. Dubois, Engineering S ystem International, RungisS ilic, France
Development and Verification of Fluid Finite Elements for the Eva
luation of Structure Fluid Interaction Effects
A.N. Gantayat, Engineering Decision Analysis Company, Palo Alto,
California, U.S .A.
Fluid Element in SAP IV
C. Yilmaz, N. Akkas, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Tur
key
Application of ANSYS Fluid Elements in FluidStructural Inter
action Problems
J.W. Leonard, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois,
H.U. Ahmed, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois,
J.A. Swanson, S wanson Analysis S ystems Corporation, Houston,
Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
23
4/8
Vibration of LiquidFilled Thin Shells

A. Kalnins, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
4/9
A New Method for Analyzing FluidStructure Interaction Using

MSC/NASTRAN
R.H. MacNeal, The MacNealSchwendler Corporation, Los Ange
les, California,
R. Citerley, ANAMET Laboratories, S an Carlos, California,
M. Chargin, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California,
U.S.A.
Session 5. Flow Induced Vibrations

5/1
5/2
5/3
5/4
5/5
5/6
B 5/7
B 5/9
A Comprehensive Analytical Approach to the Free and Forced Vi

bration Analysis of Large Steam Generator UTubes
D.J. Gorman, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
ThreeDimensional Calculation of the Coupled Vibrations of a
Group of Circular Tubes in an Unconfined Liquid
H. Weppelink, D.H . van Campen, Twente University of Technolo
gy, Enschede,
P.J.M. van der H oogt, Koninklijke Machinefabriek S tork B.V.,
Hengelo (O), The Netherlands
Dynamics of FuelElement Bundles in Axial Flow
MP. Paidoussis, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
FluidStructure Interaction of Submerged Structures
H.T.Tang, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California,
E.B. Becker, L.M. Taylor, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Te
xas, U.S.A.
Calculation and Tests on FluidElastic Interaction between a Cylin
drical Shell and a Liquid Sheet with Parallel Flow
F. Axisa, R.J. Gibert, CEA/CENDEMT, S aclay, GifsurYvette,
France
withdrawn
FlowInduced Vibration and Instability of an Elastic Pipe Structure
E.C. Ting, J.L. Knning, Purdue University, WestLafayette, In
diana, U.S.A.
Vibration Study of a Tube Bank in Liquid Cross Flow
F.N. Remy, Electricit de France, Direction des Etudes et Recher
ches, Chatou, France
A Theoretical Analysis of TwoPhase Flow/Fuel Pin Structural

Dynamical Interactions
F. Hara, Tokyo University of S cience, Tokyo, Japan
B 5/10 Effective Mass and Damping of Submerged Structures
R.G. Dong, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, California,
USA.
24
5/11 Experimental Investigation of Pressure Field Characteristics Ar

ound Rods and Pipes in Parallel Flow
R. Jiyavan, B. Sahay, K.S. Ram, Indian Institute of Technology,
Kanpur, India
5/13 An Experimental Vibration Study of InAir and Fluid Coupled Co
Axial Cylinders
M. Chu, J.F. Lestingi, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio,
S.J. Brown, Babcock & Wilcox Co., Nuclear Equipment Division,
Barberton, Ohio, U.S.A.
Session 6. PWR Problems

6/1*
FluidStructure Interactions in PWR Vessels during Blowdown

Code Development at Karlsruhe and Results
U. Schumann, G. Enderle, F. Katz, . Ludwig, H . Msinger, E.G.
Schlechtendahl, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe,
Fed. Rep. Germany
6/2 H ydroelastic Effects of a Loss of Coolant in a Pressurized
Water Reactor
J.K. Dienes, C.W. Hirt, W.C. Rivard, L.R. Stein, M.D. Torrey, Los Ala
mos S cientific Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, U.S.A.
6/3
MEL Finite Element Analysis of WaterShell Interactions in
the Context of a PWRLOCA
S. Verbiese, Brussels University, Brussels, Belgium,
G. van Goethem, Commission of the European Communities,
J.R.C. Ispra Establishment, Ispra, Italy
6/4 Analysis of the RS16B Experiment on FluidStructure Interactions
During PWR Blowdown
U. Schumann, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Fed.
Rep. Germany
6/5
Dynamic Behavior of a PWRCore Barrel. Analytical Integration of
the Cylindrical Shell Equations
A. Ludwig, R. Krieg, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe,
Fed. Rep. Germany
6/6
6/7
Coupled FluidStructure Analysis of the Core Barrel Behaviour Dur

ing Blowdown
F. Katz, E.G. Schlechtendahl, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe,
Karlsruhe, Fed. Rep. Germany
Calculations on the H DR Core Barrel Response During Snap
back Tests
A. Ludwig, U. Schumann, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe,
25
Session 7. BWR Problems I

7/1*
Pressure Distribution due to Steam Bubble Collapse in a BWR

Suppression Chamber
E. Giencke, Technische Universitt Berlin, Berlin, Germany
7/2 H ydroelastic Phenomena in Boiling Water Reactor Suppression
Pools
B.D. Nichols, C.W. Hirt, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Ala
mos, New Mexico, U.S.A.
7/3
Fluid Structure Interaction in the Pool of Pressure Suppression
Systems Containing Oscillating Bubbles
P. AntonySpies, Kraftwerk Union AG, Offenbach, Fed. Rep. Ger
many
7/4 Suppression Pool Transients in BWRs Under LOCA and SRV Con
ditions
C K Chu, J.M. Ray mont. Burns & Roe, Inc., Woodbury, New
York, US A.
26
Session 8. BWR Problems li

8/1 * Analytical and Experimental Mark I Boiling Water Reactor
Containment Safety Research at the Lawrence Livermore Labo
ratory
E.W. McCauley, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, Cali
fornia, US A.
8/2*
8/3
8/4
8/5
8/6
8/7
8/8
Description of Internal Flow Problems by a Boundary Integral Me

thod with Dipole Panels
R. Krieg, G. Hailfinger, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Karls
ruhe, Fed. Rep. Germany
Unconventional Dynamic Behaviour of Thin Spherical Contain
ment Shells. A Semianalytical Description
B. Gol 1er, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Fed. Rep.
Germany
Coupled Fluid Structural Analysis for a Spherical BWR Contain
ment with Pressure Suppression System
R. Krieg, . Gller, G. H ailfinger, Kernforschungszentrum Karls
ruhe, Karlsruhe, Fed. Rep. Germany
Coupled Vibrations of a Structure and Fluid Excited by Pressure
Shocks
J. Arros, Technical Research Centre of Finland, Helsinki, Finland
Structural Analysis Study of FluidStructure Interaction Effects in
BWR Mark II Reinforced Concrete Containment
M. Michail, G. Shah, Bechtel Power Corporation, S an Francisco,
California, U.S .A.
withdrawn
Practical Application of Current Fluid/Structure Interaction
Technology to the Design and Analysis to BWR Containment
Vessels
N.W. Edwards, NUTECH, Inc., San Jose, California, U.S .A.
Applicability of Flat Plate Methods in Determining Fluid/Struc
ture Interaction Effects in BWR Pressure Suppression Sys
tems
G.S. Holman, E.W. McCauley, S.C.H. Lu, Lawrence Livermore La
boratory, Livermore, California, U.S .A.
27
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Division C. ANALYSIS OF REACTOR FUEL
AND CLADDING MATERIALS
Session C 1,. Fuel and Fission Product Behavior I
C 1 /1 * Behaviour of Fission Products in PWR Primary Coolant and Defected Fuel Rods Evaluation
P. Bourgeois, J.P. Stora, Electricit de France, Tour EDF-GDF, Paris, France
C 1/2
A Model for the Dynamic Intragranular Fission Gas Swelling and
Release
J.M.Griesmeyer.N.M.Ghoniem.D.Okrent, University of California,
Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
C 1/3
Prediction of Fission Gas Release from High Burnup Oxide Fuel
I.J. Hastings, M.J.F. Notley, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Chalk
River Nuclear Laboratories, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada
C 1/4
Intragranular Fission Gas Behavior During a Slow Thermal Transient
W. Steele, D. Okrent, A.R. Wazzan, University of California, Los
Angeles, California,
C 1/5
Three-Dimensional Unsteady Thermal Stresses in a Finite Circular

Cylinder
N. Noda, Shizuoka University, Hamamatsu
Y. Takeuti, University of Osaka Prefecture, Sakai, Osaka, Japan
Session C 1. Fuel and Fission Product Behavior II

C 1/6
C Ml
C 1 /8
The Mechanistic Prediction of Fission-Gas Behavior During Inceli Transient Heating Tests on LWR Fuel Using the Grass-SST
and Fastgrass Computer Codes
J. Rest, S.M. Gehl, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois,
U.S.A.
Unsteady Thermal Stresses in an Orthotropic Composite Disk Due
to Asymmetrical Heating
Y. Takeuti, Y. Tanigawa, University of Osaka Prefecture, Sakai,
Osaka, Japan
Modelling of Transient Pre-Failure Fuel Relocation for LMFBR Accident Analysis
B. Kuczera, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Fed.
Rep. Germany
M. Billaux, Belgonuclaire, Brussels, Belgium
Notes: The sign () designates Invited Lectures.

A title, mentioned on the Table of Contents but not followed by a summary or a paper means that the oaper
A pc per number missing in the numeral order means that the paper was cancelled or withdrawn.
28
C 1/9
UO5 Pore Migration and Grain Growth Kinetics

C.S^ Olsen, EG.&G. Idaho, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho, U.S.A.
C 1/10 Prediction of Thermal, Mechanical, and Fission Gas Behavior of
Carbide Fuel Element During Fast Thermal Transients Using the
UNCLE-TUBE Code
Y.D. Ting, A.R. Wazzan, D. Okrent, University of California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
C 1/11 Behaviour of Fast Fuel Bundles under Irradiation
G. Marbach, P. Millet, J. Robert, A. Languille, CEA/CEN-Cadarache, Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, France
Session C 2. Graphite Fuels Analysis

C 2/1*
C 2/2
C 2/3
C 2/4
C 2/5
C 2/6
Experimental Verification of Stress Model Calculations for HTR

Fuel Particles
M. Herren, P. Krautwasser, Kernforschungsanlage Jlich, Jlich,
A.-W. Mehner, HOBEG mbH, Hanau, Fed. Rep. Germany
Statistical Methods for Predicting Failure Probability of Coated
Particles
H.-L. Gehr, INTERATOM, Bergisch Gladbach,
K. Bongartz, Kernforschungsanlage Jlich, Jlich, Fed. Rep. Germany
Stress Performance Calculations as a Guide for Layout and
Testing of Coated Fuel Particles for HTRs
K. Bongartz, Kernforschungsanlage Jlich, Jlich, Fed. Rep. Germany
Residual Stress, Strain, and Strength Measurements in Peach Bottom Fuel Test Elements
CF. Wallroth, C.M. Miller, J.J. Saurwein, General Atomic Company,
San Diego, California, U.S.A.
Irradiation Experiment with a Large Graphite Block
H. Cords, M. O'Connor, G. Kleist, Kernforschungsanlage Jlich,
Jlich, Fed. Rep. Germany
P. Zeisser, Commission of the European Communities, Research
Center Petten, Petten, The Netherlands
A 3-D Inelastic Analysis of HTR Graphite Structures and a Comparison with a 2-D Approach
J. Willaschek, INJERATOM, Bergisch Gladbach, Fed. Rep. Germany
Session C 3,. Cladding Materials Behavior I

C 3/3
A Phenomenological Thermal and Irradiation Creep Model for Zircaloy

G. Senski, A. Kunick, Kraftwerk Union AG, Erlangen, Fed. Rep. Germany
29
C 3/5
C 3/6
First Results of Cladding Tube Creep Experiments in FRG2

M. Gartner, G. Kaspar, G. Senski, Kraftwerk Union AG, Erlangen,
. Reymann, . Wilhelm, Gesellschaft fr Kernenergieverwertung
in Schiffbau und Schiffahrt, GeesthachtTesperhude, Fed. Rep.
Germany
Prediction of Creep Transients in Zircaloy Fuel Cladding Using
Anelastic Strain Model
K.L. Murty, K.K. Yoon, Babcock & Wilcox Company, Lynchburg,
Virginia, U.S.A.
Session C 3. Cladding M aterials Behavior II

C 3/8
C 3/9
C 3/10
C 3/11
C 3/12
C 3/13
Analysis of Reactor Fuel: Failure Criteria

J.H. Gittus, UKAEA, S pringfields Nuclear Power Development
Laboratories, Springfields, Sa/wick, Preston, UK.
A Relationship Between Swelling and the Shear Modulus of Irra
diated Metal
J.F. Bates, Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory, Rich
land, Washington, U.S.A.
CDAA Computer Code for Analysis of BWR Fuel Channel Deflec
tion
S.S. Sawhney, S. Basu, A.K. Anand, S.K. Mehta, Bhabha Atomic
Research Centre, Trombay, Bombay, India
COMTAA Computer Code for Fuel Mechanical and Thermal Ana
lysis
S. Basu, S.S. Sawhney, A.K. Anand, K. Anantharaman, S.K. Mehta,
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Bombay, India
On Slow Crack Growth in Fuel Cladding by Finite Element Analysis
T.R. H su, Y.J. Kim, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba,
Canada
Tensile Properties of Zircaloy4 and 304 Stainless Steel at
Constant True StrainRates
OS. H artley, D.A. Jenkins, J.J. Lee, University of Florida, Gaines
ville, Florida, U.S.A.
Session C 4,. Failure Criteria I

C 4/2
C 4/3
30
Plastic Instability of Zircaloy Cladding Submitted to LOCA Condi

tions
A. Leridon, O Pauwels, CEACEN Cadarache, S aintPaullezDur
ance, France
A Cumulative Damage Fraction Design Approach for LMFBR Me
tallic Fuel Elements
D.L. Johnson, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois
R.E. Einziger, G.D. Hudman, Argonne National Laboratory, Idaho
Falls, Idaho, U.S.A.
C 4/4
C 4/5
C 4/7
C 4/8
The Stress for the Formation of a Cladding Crack During a Power

Ramp
E. Smith, Joint Manchester University/UMIST Metallurgy Department, Manchester, U.K.
PCI Optimized Reactor Operation by Application of the Fuel
Failure Code POSHO
E. Rolstad, Scandpower, Halden, Norway
Failure Criteria for the Probabilistic Fuel Performance Code FRP
lb. Misfeldt, Ris National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark
Crack Propagation in a Fuel Cladding with a Local Bulging Caused
by Internal Pressure
A.F. Emery, A.S. Kobayashi, W.J. Love, V.J. Luthra, University of
Washington, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A.
Session C 4. Failure Criteria II

C 4/11 The Effects of Defects on the Failure of Tubes
M.C. Coleman, J.A. Williams, CEGB, Marchwood Engineering Laboratories, Marchwood, Southampton, U.K.
withdrawn
C 4/12 Modelling the Thermal Mechanical Behaviour of a Fuel Pin due to
Oxidation Effects
J.J.M. Too, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada
31
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Division D. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF REACTOR
FUEL ELEMENTS AND ASSEMBLIES
Session D 1. Fuel Performance Analysis
D 1 /1 * Interaction between Thermal and Structural Behavior in FBR Fuel
Pins
B.L. Harbourne, M.R. Patel, J.D. Stephen, General Electric Co.,
Advanced Reactor Systems Department, Sunnyvale, California,
USA.
D 1/2 The BACO Fuel Rod Analysis Computer Program
S. Harriague, G. Coroli, E.J. Savino, Comisin Nacional de Energia
Atmica, Buenos Aires, Argentina
D 1/4 The FROST Code for Predicting In-Reactor Behaviours of LWR
Fuel Rod
H. Nuno, Y. Irisa, M. Mizuta, Mitsubishi Atomic Power Industries,
Inc., Omiya, Saitama, Japan
D 1/5
WAFER-3. An Extended Version for High-speed Analysis of Rods
with an Axial Power Profile
N. Kjaer-Pedersen, Ris National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark
D 1/7
Heat Transfer Analysis of an Eccentric Fuel/Sheath Geometry
Using the Finite Element Method
G.L. Rigby, M.H. Schankula, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited,
Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba,
Canada
D 1/8
Fuel Pins In-Pile Reliability and End-of-Life Failure Probability
Estimate
J. Truffert, CEA/CEN-Cadarache, Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, France
D 1/9
VERDON - Fuel Pin Mechanical and Thermal Behaviour Code
C. Courtois, J. Truffert, CEA/CEN-Cadarache, Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, France
Session D 2. Pellet-Clad Interaction Effects on Clad Behavior

D 2/1
D 2/2
Influence of Pellet-Clad-Gap-Size on LWR Fuel Rod Performance

B. Brzoska, H.P. Fuchs, F. Garzarolli, R. Manzel, Kraftwerk Union
AG, Erlangen, Fed. Rep. Germany
Post Irradiation Examination and Analysis of 13 (U, Pu)C-Fuel Pins
Irradiated in the Thermal Flux of FR 2
P. Weimar, H. Steiner, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Fed. Rep. Germany

was not available at lhe time of finishing of the book.
32
D 2/3
D 2/4
D 2/5
D 2/6
D 2/7
D2/8
Pellet-Cladding Mechanical Operating Failure Limits and Inferred

Strain Thresholds
C L Mohr, P.J. Pankaskie, C M . Heeb, Batteile Pacific Northwest
Laboratories, Richland, Washington, USA.
withdrawn
Sensitivity of Power Ramp Induced Cladding Stress and Strain
Concentrations to Modelling Assumptions
W. Hering, Kraftwerk Union AG, Erlangen, Fed. Rep. Germany,
IB. Fiero, RS. Darling, Combustion Engineering Inc., Windsor,
Connecticut, U.S.A.
Analysis of Mechanical and Chemical Pellet-Clad Interaction During Power Ramps
W. Vogl, W. Hering, M. Peehs, Kraftwerk Union AG, Erlangen, Fed.
Rep. Germany,
J. LaVake, Combustion Engineering Inc., Windsor, Connecticut,
U.S.A.
The Fuel-Cladding Interfacial Friction Coefficient in WaterCooled Reactor Fuel Rods
E. Smith, Joint Manchester University/UMIST Metallurgy Department, Manchester, U.K.
Transient Pellet-Cladding Interaction of LWR Fuel Rod
B.M. Ma, Iowa State University, Department of Nuclear Engineering, Ames, Iowa, U.S.A.
Stress Distributions in Fuel Element Cladding During Pellet-Clad
Interaction
R.S. Darling, I.B. Fiero, M.E. Scott, Combustion Engineering, Inc.,
Windsor, Connecticut, U.S.A.
Session D 3. Methods for Analysis for Pellet-Clad Interaction

D 3/1 * The Structure of Fuel Element Codes
K. Lassmann, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Fed.
Rep. Germany
D 3/2 Theoretical and Experimental Analyses of Cladding Strain Produced by Expansion of Cracked Fuel Pellets
M. Nakatsuka, Toshiba Research and Development Center, Kawasaki-City, Kanagawa,
T. Sakuyama, Nuclear Engineering Department, Toshiba Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
D 3/3
Stresses and Strains at Zircaloy Cladding Ridges
G.V. Ranjan, G.N. Brooks, Failure Analysis Associates, Palo Alto,
California,
A.K. Miller, Stanford University, Stanford, California, U.S.A.
D 3/4
Finite Element Pellet-Clad Interaction Model
A. Alujevic, P. Skerget, Institut Jozef Stefan, University of Ljubljana,
B. Cernej, University of Maribor, Maribor, Yugoslavia
33
D 3/5
D 3/6
D 3/7
D 3/8
A Formulation for the Analysis of Pellet-Cladding Mechanical Interaction

Y.Y. Liu, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois,
J.E. Meyer, A.S. Argon, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
A Model for the Description of the Fuel-Cladding Mechanical Interaction in Fast Breeder Reactor Fuel Pins
I. Mller-Lyda, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Fed.
Rep. Germany
Effect of Material Properties on Pellet-Clad Interaction Pressure
S. Bir Singh, S.B. Bhoje, S.R. Paranjpe, Reactor Research Centre,
Kalpakkam, India
Fracture Mechanics Method of Evaluating Failures in PelletCladding Interaction Analysis
D.T. Ramani, Sargent & Lundy Engineers, Inc., Chicago, Illinois,
U.S.A.
Session D 4. Thermal Reactor Subassembly Analysis

D 4/1
D 4/3
D 4/4
D 4/5
D 4/6
D 4/7
D 4/8
34
A Model for Creep and Relaxation Consideration in a Fuel Rod Assembly

H.T.Tang, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Calif. U.S.A.
Nonlinear Asymmetric Load Deflection Characteristics of a Reactor Fuel Bundle
H.D. Fisher, Combustion Engineering, Inc., Windsor, Connecticut,
U.S. A.
Effects of Gap Sizes on Stresses and Deflections of a Fuel Element
T.S. Wu, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, U.S.A.
A Model for Fuel Rod and Tie Rod Elongations in Boiling Water Reactor Fuel Bundles
K.R. Merckx, Exxon Nuclear Company, Inc., Richland, Washington,
U.S.A.
Fuel Bundle End Plate Analysis by Code SPACE
A.G. Chhatre, M. Das, S.A. Bhardwaj, R.S. Rustagi, Department of
Atomic Energy, Power Projects Engineering Division, Colaba,
Bombay, India
Analysis of Colliding Vibration of Two Cylinders
A.K. Ghosh, R.K. Grover, A. Kakodkar, Bhabha Atomic Research
Centre, Trombay, Bombay, India
An Assessment of Loading Effects on Magnox Fuel Elements in
Transport Accidents
H.J. Dowler, J.P. Whitehead, CEGB Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories,
Berkeley, Gloucestershire, U.K.
withdrawn
Session D 5. Fast Reactor Subassembly Analysis

D 5/1*
Structural Evaluation of Fast Reactor Core Restraint with Irradiation Creep-Swelling Opposition Effects
J.E. Kalinowski, Westinghouse Advanced Reactors Division, Madison, Pennsylvania,
D.V. Swenson, Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico,
USA.
D 5/2
Rules for Structural Design of LMFBR Core Subassemblies

H. Meyer zur Capeilen, H. Tbbe, INTERATOM, Bergisch Gladbach,
Fed. Rep. Germany,
B. Kazimierzak, Belgonuc/aire, Bruxelles, Belgium
An Analytical Study of the Dilation of Fast Reactor Fuel Assembly
Ducts
D.P. Chan, R.J. Jackson, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington, U.S.A.
D 5/3
D 5/5
The Restrained Core Modelling Program CRAMP

R.C. Perrin, AERE Harwell, Didcot, UK.
D 5/6
Bowing and Interaction Model for Sub-Assemblies in a Fast Reactor Core
S. Bir Singh, S. Govindarajan, S.B. Bhoje, Reactor Research
Centre, Kalpakkam, Tami/nadu, India
D 5/7 Calculation of Equilibrium Configurations of a Hexagonal Array of
Deformed Subassemblies
A. Bernard, CEA/CEN-Cadarache DRNR, St.-Paul-lez-Durance,
France
D 5/8
Elastic Plastic Analysis of Fuel Element Assemblies-Hexagonal
Claddings and Fuel Rods: Effects of Thermal Bowing of Fuel
Rods, External Pressure of Coolant, and Elevated Temperatures
M.M. Mamoun, Institute of Gas Technology, Chicago, Illinois,
T.S. Wu, P.S. Chopra, D.C Rardin, Argonne National Laboratory,
Argonne, Illinois, USA.
D 5/9 BEACON: A Three-Dimensional Structural Analysis Code for
Bowing History of Fast Breeder Reactor Cores
K. Miki, Energy Research Laboratory, Hitachi Ltd., Ibaragi, Japan
D 5/10 Some Fundamental Principles of Voidage Induced Bowing of Fuel
Pins in Subassemblies
R.G. Anderson, U.K.A.E.A., Risley Nuclear Power Development
Establishment, Risley, Warrington, Cheshire, U.K.
Session D 6. Accident and Overpower Transient Analysis of
Thermal Reactors
D 6/1 * Strain-Rate Dependent Plasticity in Thermo-Mechanical Transient Analysis
Y.R. Rashid, M.N. Sharabi, ANATECH International Corp., La Jolla,
California, U.S.A.
35
D 6/2
D 6/3
D 6/4
D 6/5
D 6/6
Characterization of Transient Deformation of Zircaloy Fuel Cladding for LOCA Conditions

OL. Mohr, Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland, Washington, U.S.A.
GAPCON - Thermal-3: A Technique for Evaluating Transient
Gap Conductance and Stored Energy
O L Mohr, D.D. Lanning, F.E. Panisko, Battelle Pacific Northwest
Laboratories, Richland, Washington, U.S.A.
A Simplified Method of Computing Clad and Fuel, Stress and Strain
During an Overpower Transient
M.V. Frank, W.E. Kastenberg, University of California, Los Angeles,
California, U.S.A.
Analytical Model for Transient Gas Flow in Nuclear Fuel Rods
R. Oehlberg, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto.California,
D.S. Rowe, Rowe and Associates, Bellevue, Washington, U.S.A.
Sensitivity of Fuel Rods Material Properties to Hypothetical PWR
LOCA
R. Oehlberg, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Session D 7. Accident and Overpower Transient Analysis of

Fast Reactors
D 7/1 * Bridging the Gap between Whole Core Accident and Fuel Behaviour Codes
J.R. Matthews, A.E.R.E. Harwell, Didcot, U.K.
D 7/2
Modeling of Fast Reactor Cladding Failure for Hypothetical Accident Transient Analysis
J.M. Kramer, R.J. DiMelfi, T.H. Hughes, L.W. Deitrich, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne Illinois, U.S.A.
D 7/3
Fuel Deformation in a Loss-of-Flow Accident in the Gas-Cooled
Fast Breeder Reactor
T.R. Wehner, D.T. Eggen, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, U.S.A.
current address Wehner: Energy Division. Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos. N.M.
U.SA.
Eggen: DSN/SES, C.E.N. Cadarache, F-I3115 St Paul-lez-Durance, France
D 7/4
D 7/6
36
87545,
Thermohydraulic and Thermal Stress Aspects of a Porous Blockage in an LMFBR Fuel Assembly
T.M. Kuzay, W.W. Marr, W.H. Hellenberg, R.E. Wilson, D.R.
Pedersen, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois,
T. Ariman, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana,
USA.
Fuel Pin Response to an Overpower Transient in an LMFBR
A.J. Grosberg, J.L. Head, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London, U.K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Division E. ENERGETICS AND STRUCTURAL DYNAM ICS
IN FAST REACTOR ACCIDENT ANALYSIS
Session E 1. HCDA Containment
E 1/1* The Computer Code SEURBNUK2: Recent Developments
R. Staniforth, UKAEA, AEE Winfrith, Dorchester, Dorset, U.K.,
A. Yerkess, Commission of the European Communities, J.R.C.
E 1/2* ThreeDimensional FluidStructure Interaction Dynamics of a
PoolReactor InTank Component
R.F. Kulak, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne. Illinois. U.S.A.
E 1/3
Potential Missiles from LMFBR Vessels During an H CDA. Some
Bounding Analyses
C M . Romander, D.J. Cagliostro, S RI International, Menlo Park,
California, US A.
E 1 /4 ALICE An Arbitrary LagrangianEulerian Code for Analyzing FBR
Containment Response to H CDA
H.Y. Chu, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois. U.S .A.
E 1/5
A Comparison of Rezoning Techniques for Lagrangian LMFBR
Containment Codes
M. Delaval, Commission of the European Communities, J.R.C. Ispra
Establishment, Ispra, Italy
E 1 /6
Behaviour of Pressure Wavesand Fragments after Vessel Rupture
Calculated with the PISCES2 DELKCode
H. Schrkamp, Brown, Boverie & Cie, Mannheim,
W. Pohl, Control Data GmbH, Frankfurt/Main, Fed. Rep. Germany
E 1
Experimental and Associated Theoretical Studies of the Response
of Reactor Structures to H ypothetical Core Disruptive Accident
Loadings
K.M. Leigh, V. Washby, U.K.A.E.A., Northern Division, Risley,
Warrington, Cheshire,
R. Pottinger, MOD(PE), Atomic Weapons Research Establishment,
SouthendonSea, Essex, U.K.

A title mentiored on the Table of Contents but not followed by a summary or a paper means that the paper
37
Session E 2. Upper Core Structures and Cover Response

E 2/1*
E 2/2
E 2/3
E 2/4
E 2/5
E 2/6
Energetics of LMFBR Core Disruptive Accidents

J.F. Marchaterre, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois,
U.S.A.
Structural and Coupling Formulation for Upper Internals for
LMFBR
J.M. Kennedy, C.Y.Wang, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne,
Illinois,
IB. Belytschko, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, U.S.A.
Analysis of a Bubble Growth (HCDA) in a Fluid Inside a Primary
Containment with Internals
J.F. Chedmail, J.L. Gregis, J. Dubois, A. de Rouvray, Engineering
System International, Rungis-Silic, France
Characterization of Dynamic Loads on the LMFBR Rotating Shield
E. Morris, Nuclear Installations Inspectorate, London, U.K.
Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of a Deck Structure During a
HCDA
R.F. Kulak, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, U.S.A.
Validation of a Cavitation Model and its Appi cation to Containment
Loading Experiments
A.V. Jones, Commission of the European Communities, J.R.C.
Session E 3. Coolant System and Materials Response

E 3/1 *
E 3/3
E 3/4
E 3/5
E 3/7
38
Dynamic Uniaxial and Biaxial Stress-Strain Relationships for Austenitic Stainless Steels
C. Albertini, M. Montagnani, Commission of the European Communities, J.R.C. Ispra Establishment, Ispra, Italy
Three-Dimensional Response of Piping Systems to Internally Propagating Pressure Pulses
M.T.A-Moneim, Y.W. Chang, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois
T.B. Belytschko, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, U.S.A.
Coupled Hydrodynamic-Structural Analysis of an Integral Flowing
Sodium Test Loop in the TREAT Reactor
W.R. Zeuch, M.T.A-Moneim, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, U.SA.
Thermal-Hydraulic and Structural Safety Analysis of SLSF P3 Experiment
W.A. Ragland, J.H. Tessier, Argonne National Laboratory,
Argonne, Illinois,
T. Ariman, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame,
Indiana, USA.
Evaluation of DNB Induced Fatigue in Heat Transfer Tubes
S.A. Kamal, D.H. Pai, J.M. Chern, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Livingston, New Jersey, U.S.A.
Session E 4. Experiments and Code Verification I

E 4/1 *
E 4/2
E 4/4
E 4/5
E 4/6
E 4/7
Experimental Validation of the Containment Codes ASTARTE and

SEURBNUK
K.C. Kendall, L. Arnold, B.J. Broadhouse, UKAEA, AEE Winfrith,
Dorchester, Dorset, U.K..
A. Benuzzi, A.V. Jones, A. Yerkess, Commission of the European
Communities, J.R.C. Ispra Establishment, Ispra, Italy
Energetics of Simulated HCDA Bubble Expansions: Some Potential Attenuation Mechanisms
R.J.Tobin, D.J. Cagliostro, D.W. Ploeger, SRI International, Menlo
Park, California, U.S.A.
Recent Results on PEC Reactor HCDA Containment Investigations
R. Cenerini, Universit di Bologna, Bologna,
A. Palamidessi, CNEN Dipartimento Reattori Veloci, Bologna,
G. Verzelletti, Commission of the European Communities, J.R.C.
The Development and Validation of Thin Shell Models in Computer
Codes for Fast Reactor Containment Analysis
K.C. Kendall, UKAEA, Atomic Energy Establishment, Winfrith, Dorchester, Dorset,
P.H.West, MOD(PE)AWREAldermaston, Reading, Berkshire, U.K.
Comparison Between Calculations and Tests for a Support
Structure of a LMFBR Tank Under the HCDA
V. Giuliano, M. Scala, AMN S.p.A., Genova, Italy
Experiment and Analysis on Pressure Pulse Propagation in a Plastically Deforming Pipe
Y. Ando, S. Kondo, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Session E 5. Experiments and Code Verification II

E 5/1
E 5/2
E 5/3*
Analysis of the HCDA-Simulation of the 1/6-scaled SNR-300

Fast Breeder Reactor with the PISCES-2DELK-Code
W. Pohl, Control Data GmbH. Frankfurt/Main, Fed. Rep. Germany,
M.J. v. d. Hoek, Physics International Co., Gouda, The Netherlands,
M.S. Cowler, Physics International Co., San Leandro, California,
U.S.A.
Fracture Experiments with Cracked and Embrittled Hexcan Sections
H.J. Petroski, H. Yamada, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne,
Illinois, U.S.A.
ICECO Simulation of the COVA Experiment
C.Y. Wang, Y.W. Chang, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, U.S.A.
39
E 5/4
E 5/5
E 5/6
Structural Response of a 1 /20Scale Model of the CRBR to a Simu

lated H CDA
C M . Romander, D.J. Cagliostro, S RI International, Menlo Park,
California, US A.
Comparison of REXCO Code Predictions with SRI SM2 Experi
mental Results
Y.W. Chang, J. Gvildys, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne,
Illinois, US A.
The Simulation of Small Scale Explosion Tests with the German
FluidStructure Interaction Code ARES
B. Baltes, W. Salz, Gesellschaft fr Reaktorsicherheit, Kln,
Y.S. H oang, T. Malmberg, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe,
Session E 6. Core Components Response

E 6/1*
Effects of Cracks on the Response of Shell Structures

H.J. Petroski, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois,
U.S. A.
E 6/2 ThreeDimensional FiniteElement Computations of the Trans
ient Response of Components Typical of a Reactor Structure
J.E. Ash, R.F. Kulak, A.H . Marchertas, Argonne National Labora
tory, Argonne, Illinois, U.S .A.
E 6/3* QuasiEulerian Formulation for FluidStructure Interaction
J.M. Kennedy, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois,
T.B. Belytschko, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois,
D.F. Schoeberle, University of Illinois at Chicago Circle, Chicago,
Illinois, U.S .A.
E 6/4* Prediction of Energy Absorption Capability and Damage Distribu
tion of a Complete LMFBR Subassembly Under Pressure Pulses
H. Zehlein, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Fed.
Rep. Germany
E 6/5
The Dynamic Response of Cracked Hexagonal Subassembly Ducts
J.L. Glazik, Jr., H .J. Petroski, Argonne National Laboratory, Ar
gonne, Illinois, U.S .A.
E 6/6
Flow Splits and Bowing Performances of Fuel Pins in Wire Wrap
ped FBR Fuel Assemblies
K. Itoh, S. Seino, T. Kubota, Mitsubishi Atomic Power Industries,
Inc., Omiya City, Saitama, Japan
E 6/7
Flow Induced Vibrations of LMFBR Structures
F. Axisa, R.J. Gibert, . Villard, CEA/CENS aclay DEMT, Gif
surYvette, France
40
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Division F. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF REACTOR CORE
AND COOLANT CIRCUIT STRUCTURES
Session F 1. Reactor Core Structures
F 1/1
F 1/2
F 1 /3
F 1/4
F 1/5
F 1/6
Stress Relaxation Analysis for Irradiation Creep and Swelling in

Pressure Tubes
J.M. Beeston, T.K. Burr, EG.<SG. Idaho, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho,
U.S.A.
Analysis of Pressure Tube Elongation and End Shield Interac
tions in the CAN DU Reactors
A.R. Causey, S.R. MacEwen, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.,
Chalk River, Ontario,
H.O Jamieson, A.B. Mitchell, Ontario Hydro, Toronto, Ontario, Ca
nada
Vibration of PWR Internals Considering Their Edge Conditions and
Holes
V. Kuzelka, National Research Institute for Machine Design, Pra
gue, Czecholovakia
Plastic Analysis of the Core Barrel Flange Deformations According
to NonSymmetric Bending Loadings
U. Berkner, Kraftwerk Union AG, Erlangen, Fed. Rep. Germany
Stressand Displacement Analysis of a Core Plate, i. e. Gridperfo
rated Plate Compound, Modelled as an Equivalent Beam System
R. Frank, R. Engel, Kraftwerk Union AG, Erlangen, Fed. Rep. Ger
many
Pump Induced Fluctuating Pressure in a Reactor Coolant Pipe
L. Lee, S. Chandra, Combustion Engineering, Inc., C Power Sy
stems, Windsor, Connecticut, U.S .A.
Session F 2. Special Problems

F 2/1
F 2/2
Vibration Studies on a Three Loop PWR Internals Model

R. Assedo, G. Castello, FRAMATOME, Paris La Dfense,
A. Epstein, R.J. Gibert, CEA./CENS aclay DEMT, Gifsur
Yvette
G. Baylac, Electricit de France, SEPTEN, Paris La Dfense, France
Nuclear Reactor Surveillance Neutron Noise Measurements and
Vibration Analysis on French PWR Internal Structures
R. Assedo, G. Hugot, FRAMATOME, Paris La Dfense,
A. Epstein, RJ. Gibert, CEA./CENSaclay DEMT, GifsurYvette,
France
The sign (| designates Invited Lectures.

41
F 2/3
Application of Acoustic Emission as a Monitoring System During

Hydrostatic Tests of Nuclear Reactor Components
E.J. Votava, Kraftwerk Union AG, Erlangen, Fed. Rep. Germany
F 2/4
Prediction of the Vibratory Behaviour of a Multistage Gaseous Diffusion Plant
P. Descleve, C. Bertaut, NOVATOME, Le Plessis Robinson,
P. Briot, USSI, Bagneux, France
F 2/6* Stress Corrosion Cracking Experiments in Piping of Light Water
Reactor Power Plants
L.C Shao, Division of Reactor Safety Research, Office of Nuclear
Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
F 2/8
Theoretical and Experimental Study on Induction Heating Stress
Improvement (IHSI) of Nuclear Primary Piping
Y. Ando, G. Yagawa, University of Tokyo, Tokyo,
Y. Hayase, The Tokyo Electric Power Co., Inc., Tokyo,
T. Umemoto, Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd., Yokohama,
K. Enomoto, Mechanical Engineering Research Laboratory, Hitachi
Ltd, Hitachishi,
S. Nakayama, Toshiba Corporation, Tokyo,
T. Watanabe, Century Research Center Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
Session F 3. Piping: Structural Analysis

F 3/1
F 3/2
F 3/3
F 3/4
F 3/5
42
Experimental and Elastic-Plastic Numerical Analysis of a PWR

Piping Elbow Subjected to Pressure Cycling
J.P. Prost, J.J. Doyen, FRAMATOME, Paris la Dfense,
T. Foult, SOCOTEC, Dpartement Gnie Industriel et Nuclaire,
Paris,
H. Jakubowicz, CEA./CEN-Saclay
DEMT, Gif-sur-Yvette,
France
In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Bending Tests on Carbon Steel Pipe
Bends
D. Brouard, A. Tremblais, B. Vrillon, CEA./CEN-Saclay DEMT,
Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Stesses in a Curved Pipe Subject to an In-plane Bending Moment
E. Hofmann, U. Heeschen, Kraftwerk Union AG, Erlangen, Fed.
Rep. Germany
Theoretical and Experimental Analysis on Tee Piping Components
F. Cesari, S. Curioni, S. McLoughlin, A. Meneghini, C.N.E.N., Dipartimento Reattori Veloci, Bologna, Italy
Simplified Creep Buckling Analysis of Elbows under In-Plane
Bending
A. Imazu, O-arai Engineering Center, Power Reactor and Nuclear
Fuel Development Corporation, Ibaraki,
K. Nakamura, Takasago Technical Institute, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., Takasago, Japan
F 3/6
F 3/1
F 3/8
An Elastoplastic Elbow Element: Theory and Applications

L. Lazzeri, AMN S.p.A., Genova, Italy
Detailed Analyses of Three Elbow-Pipe Assemblies for Typical
Load Cases
T. Kano, K. Iwata, Y. Wada, Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation, Tokyo,
H. Takeda, S. Asai, S. Uesugi, Century Research Center Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
Stress Distribution and Flexibility of the Suction Bend of the Primary Sodium/Pump LMFBR - SNR 300
H.K. Kwee, Stork Boilers, Hengelo, The Netherlands
Session F 4. Piping: Dynamic Analysis

F 4/1 *
F 4/2
F 4/3
F 4/4
F 4/5
F 4/6
Structural Behaviour of Piping Systems under Accident Conditions

L. Issler, Staatliche Materialprfungsanstalt (MPA), Universitt
Stuttgart, Stuttgart,
G. Katzenmeier, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe,
Fed. Rep. Germany
Acoustic Pressure Pulsations in Pressurized Water Reactors
MM. Cepkauskas, Combustion Engineering, Inc., Windsor, Connecticut, U.S.A.
Vibrationof Three-Dimensional Piping Subject to Pump Pulsation
R. Keskinen, Institute of Radition Protection, Helsinki, Finland
Study and Measurement of Impact Damping in PWR Reactor Coolant System Seismic and Accident Restraints
J.C Hennart, Westinghouse Nuclear Europe, Bruxelles, Belgium
Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Piping Systems Using the Pseudo
Force Method
S. Prachuktam, P. Bezler, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
New York,
M. Hartzman, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Bethesda,
Maryland, USA.
Real-Time Numerical Evaluation of Dynamic Tests with Sudden
Closing of Valves in Piping Systems
K.-R. Leimbach, Consultant, Bochum-Linden,
W. Geidel, Kraftwerk Union AG, Offenbach, Fed. Rep. Germany
Session F 5. Fracture Mechanics

F 5/1*
F 5/2
Opening and Extension of Circumferential Cracks in a Pipe Subject

to Dynamic Loads
D.J. Ayres, T.J. Griesbach, Combustion Engineering Inc., Windsor,
Connecticut, U.S.A.
Elastic-Plastic Response of PWR Coolant Pipes Containing Postulated Circumferential Flaws
S.S. Palusamy, J.N. Chirigos, T.E. Campbell, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, PWR Systems Division, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
43
F 5/3
F 5/4
F 5/5
F 5/6
F 5/7
F 5/8
F 5/9
F 5/10
F 5/11
F 5/12
F 5/13
Numerical Study of Dynamic Crack Growth Including Fluid Inter

action
D.R.J. Owen, E. H inton, E.S. Caidis, C. Taylor, University of
Wales, Swansea, U.K.
Problems Identified in Quantifying Leak before Break in Pressure
Containing Structures
B.J.L. Darlaston, D.C. Connors, R.A.J. Hellen, CEGB Berkeley Nu
clear Laboratories, Berkeley, Gloucestershire, U.K.
The Failure of Ductile Plates Containing Thin Ligaments
I.W. Goodall, J.E. Griffiths, CEGB Berkeley Nuclear Labaratories,
Berkeley, Goucestershiere, U.K.
On the Behavior of Reinforced Mitre Bends Containing Defects
B.J.L. Darlaston, D.C. Connors, R.A.J. Hellen, CEGB Berkeley Nu
clear Laboratories, Berkeley, Gloucestershire, U.K.
Ductile Failure of Cracked Member under Combined Loading of
Membrane and Bending Stresses
H. Okamura, M. Kurotobi, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Estimating Structural Integrity of Type 304 Stainless Steel
Plates and Pipes Containing Small Defects
W.G. Reuter, F.W. Smith, EG. & G. Idaho, Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho,
T.A. Place, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, U.S.A.
Elastic Plastic Fracture Toughness Values for a Hastelloy Sample
Submitted to Static Load
P. Morgand, H. Churier, C.E.A./CENDMG/S EM, Grenoble, France
Crack Growth Rate of PWR Piping
M. Bethmont, J.J. Doyen, FRAMATOME, Paris la Dfense,
J. Lebey, CEA./CENS aclay DEMT, GifsurYvette, France
Determination of Vibration Strain Limits of A106B Piping
Steel
B. Mukherjee, M.L Vanderglas, Ontario Hydro Research, Toronto,
Ontario, Canada
Characterizing Fatigue Crack Propagation in 2 1 Cr1 Mo
Steel for Steam Generator Applications
W.R. Corwin, .. Booker, B.L.P. Booker, CR. Brinkman, Oak
Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S .A.
Experimental J and COD Analysis of Crack Initiation in Through
Thickness Cracked Pipes
C. Carmignani, S. Reale, Istituto di Impianti Nucleari, Facolt di
Ingegneria, Pisa,
G. Tomassetti, Comitato Nazionale per l'Energia Nucleare, Casac
cia, Roma, Italy
Session F 6. Pipe Rupture

F. 6/1 * Experimental Studies of PWR Primary Piping under LOCA
Conditions
C. Cauquelin, FRAMATOME, Courbevoie,
P. Caumette, J.L. Garcia, E. Sermet, CEA./CENCadarache,
SaintPaullezDurance, France
44
F 6/2
F 6/3
F 6/4
F 6/5
F 6/6
Experimental Study of Pipe Reaction Force and Jet Impingement

Load at the Pipe Break
K. Kitade, T. Nagatogawa, MAPI Engineering Center, Mitsubishi
Atomic Power Industries, Tokyo,
H. Nishikawa, K. Kawanishi, C. Tsruto, Takasago Technical Institute, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Takasago-City, Japan
Experimental Studies of PWR Secondary Piping in Case of Steam
Break
A. Martin, FRAMATOME, Courbevoie,
J.L. Cheissoux, J.L. Garcia, C.E.A./CEN-Cadarache, Saint-Paullez-Durance, France
Local Crush Rigidity of Pipes; Experiments and Application to Pipe
Whip Restraint Design
K. Ikonen, Technical Research Center of Finland, Helsinki,
T. Kukkola, M. K. Kangas, Imatran Voima Osakeyhti, Helsinki, Finland
Pneumatic Rupture of Pipes: The Development of the Breach
M.R. Baum, CEGB Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories, Berkeley, U.K.
Transient Pressure Reductions and Flow Areas Resulting from the
Ductile Fracture of Pressurised Cylindrical Vessels
G.B. Eke, CEGB Scientific Services Centre, Gravesend, Kent, U.K.
Session F 7. Pipe Rupture: Methodology

F 7/1
F 7/3
F1/4
F1/5
F 7/6
F 111
Design Considerations for Application of Metallic Honeycomb as

an Energy Absorber
W.H. Lee, Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, Tennessee,
R.E. Roemer, Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, Boston,
Massachusetts, U.S.A.
DIAPRS - A Computer Program for Dynamic Inelastic Analysis of
Ruptured Piping
D.P. Mondkar, University of California, Berkeley, California, U.S.A.
Elastic-Plastic Dynamic Behavior of Guard Pipes due to Sudden
Opening of Longitudinal Cracks in the Inner Pipe and Crash to the
Guard Pipe Wall
E. Theuer, M. Heller, Kraftwerk Union AG, Erlangen, Fed. Rep. Germany
Comparative Study of Models for Pipe-Whip Analysis
M.A.G. Silva, L. Bevilacqua, Promon Engenharia S.A., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Safety of Pipe Whip Restraints
C Burducea, J. Jedlicka, G. Habedank, Kraftwerk Union AG, Offenbach, Fed. Rep. Germany
Simulation of the Dynamic Loads and Stresses Due to Explosive
Rupture of a Pressure Tube in a Scaled Down Model of the
CIRENE Reactor Structure
G. Chevallard, M. Famiglietti, A. Parmeggiani, G. Possa, CISE, Centro Informazioni Studi Esperienze, Milano, Italy
45
F 7/8
Numerical and Experimental Results on the Consequences of a

Bursting Pressure Tube in a D 2 0 Power Reactor
R. Ciacci, M. Famiglietti, R. Leoni, C/SE, Centro Informazioni Studi
Esperienze, Milano, Italy
Session F 8. Components and Support Systems

F 8/1
F 8/2
F 8/3
F 8/4
F 8/5
Minimizing Unbalance Response of the CRBRP Sodium Pumps

V. Gupta, F.G. Marrujo, Byron Jackson Pump Division, Carson, California, U.S.A.
Experimental and Analytical Results of HDR Blowdown Tests Concerning Dynamic Valve Behaviour
T. Grillenberger, Gesellschaft fr Reaktorsicherheit, Garching,
K.-H. Scholl, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Fed.
Rep. Germany
Tests on a 1,75 m O.D. Bolted Flange Assembly with Spiral-Wound
Gaskets
A. Bazergui, Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Optimisation of Pipe Restraint Spacing in the Neighbourhood of
Metal Containment, Pressure Vessels or Other Equipment
L. Baraf, Motor-Columbus Consulting Engineers, Baden, Switzerland
An Economical Produre for Small Pipe Support Design
G.C.K. Yeh, Bechtel Power Corporation, Los Angeles, California,
U.S.A.
Session F 9. Heat Exchangers

F 9/1
F 9/2
F 9/3
F 9/4
F 9/5*
46
A New Design Code for 1.5 Mwt Helium Heat Exchanger

M. Kitagawa, J. Hamanaka, T. Umeda, T. Goto, Y. Saiga, Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd., Tokyo,
M. Ohnami, Ritsumeikan University Kyoto, Kyoto,
T. Udoguchi, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
Development of Analytical Procedure for the Design of 1.5 Mwt
Helium Gas Intermediate Heat Exchanger
J. Hamanaka, M. Kitagawa, T. Goto, Y. Saiga, IshikawajimaHarima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd., Tokyo,
T. Udoguchi, Chiba University, Chiba,
Y. Yamada, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Design of Heat Exchangers for High-Temperature Reactors
J. Rautenberg, H. Spilker, Hochtemperatur-Reaktorbau GmbH,
Mannheim, Red. Rep. Germany
Analytical and Experimental Studies of Tube/Support Interactions
in Multi-Span Heat Exchanger Tubes
P.L. Ko, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Chalk River, Ontario,
R.J. Rogers, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New
Brunswick, Canada
Some Advanced Methods in Stress Analysis of Sodium-Heat
Transfer Components
P.W.P.H. Ludwig, L.M. Lardenoye, Neratoom B.V., The Hague, The
Netherlands
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Division G. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF STEEL
REACTOR PRESSURE VESSELS
Session G 1. Overviews of Integrity Assessment
G 1/1* Fracture Testing in Support of RPV Failure Prevention in Switzer
land
T. Varga, Technische Universitt Wien, Vienna, Austria,
D.H. Njo, Swiss Federal Office of Energy, Nuclear S afety Division,
Wrenlingen,
G. Prantl, Swiss Federal Institute for Reactor Research, Wrenlin
gen, S witzerland
G 1/2
Comments on Brittle Fracture Control and Structural Integrity in
Nuclear Power Plant Components
M. H olzmann, J. Man, Z. Bilek, Institute of Physical Metallurgy,
Brno, Czechoslovakia
G 1/3
Evaluation of the Defect Tolerance of Pressure Vessels under
Combined Thermal and Pressure Loads
I. Milne, CEGB, CERL, Leatherhead, S urrey, U.K.
G 1/4
Radiation Embrittlement Saturation Effect in Commercial Light
water Reactors
K.E. Stahlkopf, T.U. Marston, EPRI, Palo Alto, California, U.S A.
G 1/5
Fracture Mechanics Evaluation of a Boiling Water Reactor
Vessel Following a Postuladed Loss of Coolant Accident
S. Ranganath, General Electric Co., Nuclear Energy Engineering
Dept, S an Jose, California, U.S A.
G 1/6
Fracture and BreakThrough due to Surface Crack in Reactor
Environment under Earthquake Conditions
H. Kitagawa, S. Nakagiri, R. Yuuki, K. Ogura, Institute of Industrial
Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
G 1 * U.S. Metal Properties Council Activities Pertinent to Reactor Vessel
Integrity
T.R. Mager, Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Pittsburgh, Penn
sylvania,
J.J. Koziol, Combustion Engineering, Inc., Windsor, Connecticut,
LE. Steele, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C,
A.O. Schaefer, The Metal Properties Council, Inc., New York, N.Y.,
U.S.A.

47
Session G 2. Fracture Toughness Measurements

G 2/1*
Fracture Toughness of Pressure Vessel Steels from Small Specimens

R.A. Wullaert, W.L. Server, Fracture Control Corporation, Goleta,
California, U.S.A.
G 2/2 The Determination of Critical Fracture Criteria Parameters from
Small Specimen Testing
F.J. Witt, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, PWR Systems Division, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
G 2/3 The Influence of the Stress State on Fracture Toughness Further Results
D. Aurich, H.H. Erbe, R. Helms, H. Veith, J. Ziebs, Bundesanstalt fr
Materialprfung (BAM), Berlin, Germany
G 2/3a Biaxial Nominal State of Stress at the Crack Front
H. Dietmann, K. Kussmaul, Staatliche Materialprfungsanstalt
(MPA), Universitt Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Fed. Rep. Germany
G 2/4 The Philosophy, Design, and Testing of a Uniform Applied Load
Flat Plate Testing Machine
A. Quirk, UKAEA, Safety and Reliability Directorate, Culcheth,
Warrington, Lancashire,
C.E.Crook, British Nuclear Fuels Ltd., Windscale Works, Sellafield,
Cumberland, U.K.
G 2/5 A2-and3-Dimensional Elasto-Plastic Finite Element Analysis of an
SENB Fracture Specimen
N.J.I. Adams, The British Petroleum Company Ltd., London, U.K.
G 2/6 An Overview of Crack Arrest as it Applies to ReactorVessel Integrity
T.U. Marston, K.E. Stahlkopf, EPRI, Palo A/to, California, U.SA..
E. Smith, University of Manchester/'UMIST, Manchester, U.K.
G 2/7 Revised Fracture Toughness Reference Curves
W. Oldfield, Materials Research & Computer Simulation. Goleta,
California,
T.U. Marston, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Session G 3. Fracture Mechanics: Elasto-Plastic

G 3/1*
G 3/2
48
Elasto-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Applied to the Safety Assessment of Nuclear Power Stations
N.J.I. Adams, The British Petroleum Company Ltd., London,
S.J. Garwood, The Welding Institute, Abington. Cambridge, U.K.
J.N. Robinson, Khonkaen University, Khonkaen, Thailand
Absorbed Specific Energy of Fracture, a Failure Criteria for
Neutron Irradiated Materials
F.Gillemot, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Central Research Institute for Physics, Budapest, Hungary
G 3/3
G 3/4
Energy Based Methods for Determining Elastic Plastic Fracture

F.J. Witt, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, PWR Systems Division, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
The Application of Post Yield Fracture Methodology to the Evaluation of Large Structures
J.D. Landes, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Research and
Development Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Session G 4. Fracture Mechanics: Special Aspects

G 4/1*
G 4/2
G 4/3
G 4/4
G 4/5
G 4/6
Further Studies on Stress Intensity Factors of Semi-Elliptical

Cracks in Pressurized Cylinders
A.S. Kobayashi, A.F. Emery, W.J. Love, A. Jain, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A.
The Effect of Transverse Shear and Material Orthotropy in
Cracked Cylindrical and Spherical Shells
F. Erdogan, F. Delale, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania,
USA.
Stress Intensity Factor Solutions for Arbitrarily Shaped Surface
Flaws in Reactor Pressure Vessel Nozzle Corners
S.N. Atluri, K. Kathiresan, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta,
Georgia, U.S.A.
Stress Intensity Distributions in Nozzle Corner Cracks of Complex
Geometry
C.W. Smith, W.H. Peters, W.T. Hardrath, T.S. Fleischman, Virginia
Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, Virginia, U.SA.
On the Validity of Kj .-Measurements in Instrumented Impact Tests
J.F. Kalthoff, S. Winkler, W. Klemm, J. Beinert, Institut fr Festkrpermechanik der Fraunhofer Gesellschaft, Freiburg, Fed. Rep.
Germany
The Response of Pressure Vessel Steel Specimens on Drop Weight
Loading
S. Winkler, J.F. Kalthoff, Institut fr Festkrpermechanik der
Fraunhofer Gesellschaft, Freiburg,
A. Gerscha, Kraftwerk Union AG, Erlangen, Fed. Rep. Germany
Session G 5. Fracture Mechanics: Stable Crack Growth

G 5/1*
The Use of CT-and Bend Specimens for Tearing Modulus Determinations

A.J. Carlsson, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm. Sweden,
C. Wthrich, Brown Boveri Research Center, Baden, Switzerland
G 5/1 a* The Status of Tearing Instability Analysis
withdrawn
P.C. Paris, M.P. Gomez, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri,
U.S.A.
49
G 5/2
G 5/4
G 5/5
Crack Initiation and Growth under Fully Plastic Conditions with

Applications to Pressure Vessel Steels
CF. Shih, W.R. Andrews, J.P.D. Wilkinson, V. Kumar, General
Electric Corporate Research Et Development Center, Schenecta
dy, New York, USA.
Stable Ductile Crack Growth in Reactor Pressure Vessel
Steels
E. Smith, Joint Manchester University/'UMIST Metallurgy Depart
ment, Manchester, U.K.
Consideration of Nonsteady State Crack Growth in Materials
Evaluation and Design
S.J. Hudak, Jr., Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Research and
Development Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
R.P. Wei, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Session G 6. Fracture Mechanics: Materials Modeling

G 6/1 * Evidence for the Relative Importance of Dynamic Fracture Tough
ness
D.R. Ireland, Effects Technology, Inc., Santa Barbara, California,
U.S.A.,
S. Tominaga. T. Maruyama, Babcock-Hitachi, Ltd., Kure-City, Hi
roshima Prefecture, Japan
G 6/2* Effects of Plasticity and Crack Geometry on Fracture
H. Liebowitz, J. Lee, N. Subramonian, The George Washington
University, Washington, D.C, U.S.A.
G 6/3 The Effect of Microstructure on the Fracture Toughness of Struc
tural Steels
M. Holzmann, . Vlach, . Bilek, Institute of Physical Metallurgy,
CAS, Brno, Czechoslovakia
G 6/4 Computational Modeling of Microstructural Ductile Fracture
Processes in A 533 Pressure Vessel Steel
D.R. Curran, L. Seaman, D.A. Shockey, K.C. Dao, R.L. Burback, SRI
International, Menlo Park, California, U.S.A.
G 6/5 Characterizations of Continuing Fracture in Elastic-Plastic Solids
CF. Shih. General Electric Corporate Research and Development
Center, Schenectady, New York, U.S.A.
Session G 7. Fracture Mechanics: Computation

G 7/2
G 7/3
50
Evaluation of Three-Dimensional J-lntegral of Semi-Elliptical

Surface Crack in Pressure Vessel
M. Kikuchi, H. Miyamoto, Science University of Tokyo, Noda-City,
Chiba,
Y. Sakaguchi, Kure Works, Babcock-Hitachi K.K., Kure-Shi, Hiro
shima-Ken, Japan
Stress Analysis and Fracture of Surface Cracks in Cylindrical
Pressure Vessels
J.C Newman, Jr., I.S. Raju, NASA Langley Research Center, Hamp
ton, Virginia, U.S.A.
Session G 8. Fatigue
G 8/1 * A Criterion for Analysing Fatigue Crack Initation in Geometrical
Singularities
J.C. Devaux, FRAMATOME, Etablissement de Saint Marcel, Saint
Marcel,
Y. D'Escatha, Service de l'Industrie et des Mines, Bureau de Contrle de la Construction Nuclaire, Dijon,
P. Rabbe, Creusot-Loire, Centre de Recherche d'Unieux, Unieux,
A. Pellissier-Tanon, FRAMATOME, Tour Fiat, Paris, France
G 8/2 Verification of the Resistance of PWR Thermal Sleeves to Thermal Fatigue
M. Bosser, F. Mercier, FRAMATOME, Etablissement de Saint
Marcel, Saint Marcel,
C. Amzallag, Creusot-Loire, Centre de Recherche d'Unieux, Unieux,
J. Ponsot, Creusot-Loire, Laboratoire du Creusot, Le Creusot,
France
Session G 9. Fracture Mechanics: Thermal Effects

G 9/2
G 9/4
G 9/6
Dynamic Fracture Analysis of Thermal Shock Loading in Nuclear

Pressure Vessels
P.C. Gehlen, M.F. Kanninen, GT. Hahn, Battelle Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio,
CH. Popelar, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A.
Cyclic Elastic Analysis of a PWR Nozzle Subjected to a
Repeated Thermal Shock
J.M. Locci, Engineering System International, Rungis-Silic,
J.P. Prost, FRAMATOME. Paris, France
A Fracture Mechanics Approach to Predicting the Effects of
Warm Prestressing and its Applications to Pressure Vessels
G.G. Cheli, CEGB, Research Laboratories, Leatherhead, Surrey,
U.K.
51
Session G 10. Stress Analysis

G 10/1* Interpretation of Strain Measurements on Nuclear Pressure Vessels
S.I. Andersen, P. Engbaek, Ris National Laboratory, Roskilde,
Denmark
G 10/2 Bolted Joints as a Problem of Elastically Supported Slabs
D. Kowalske, Technischer berwachungsverein Norddeutschland,
Hamburg, Fed. Rep. Germany
G 10/3 Structural Analysis of a PWR Vessel Nozzle-to-Hemisphere
P. Lecarpentier, EDF/SEPTEN, Paris,
P. Bourrier, SOCOTEC/GIN-AME, Paris,
A. Millard, CEA./CEN-Saclay DEMT, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
G 10/5 A Semi-Analytical Technique for the Design of Rolled Joints
R.K. Sinha, A. Kakodkar, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Bombay, India
G10/6 Thermal and Structural Anaysis of the Support Region of an
LMFBR Reactor Vessel
A. Hunsbedt, S. Kraus, General Electric Co., Advanced Reactor Systems Department, Sunnyvale, California, U.S.A.
G 10/7 Finite Element Analysis of Inclined Nozzle-Plate Junctions
KB. Dixit, V.K. Seth, A. Krishnan, Government of India, Power Projects Engineering Division, Colaba, Bombay,
TS. Ramamurthy, B. Dattaguru, A.K. Rao, Indian Institute of
Science, Bangalore, India
52
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Division H. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING OF
PRESTRESSED REACTOR PRESSURE VESSELS
Session H 1. Materials Behavior I
H 1/1* Properties of Concrete at Elevated Temperatures
L. Weissbacher, J. Nmet, Reaktorbau Forschungs- und Baugesellschaft, Seibersdorf,
H. Zemann, sterreichische Studiengesellschaft fr Atomenergie.
Seibersdorf, Austria
H 112 Strength Characteristics of Concrete in the Temperature Range of
20 to 200 C
R. Kottas, J. Seeberger. H.K. Hilsdorf. Universitt Karlsruhe. Karlsruhe, Fed. Rep. Germany
H 1/3
Heat and Moisture Transfer in Concrete Under the Influence of
Temperature
J.C Hundt, Bundesanstalt fr Materialprfung, Berlin (West), Germany
H 1/4
Concrete for PCRVs: Mechanical Properties at Elevated Temperatures and Residual Mechanical Behaviour after Triaxial Preloading
H. AschI, Ingenieurbro Alois Aschl, Mnchen,
W. Moosecker, Technische Universitt Mnchen, Mnchen, Fed.
Rep. Germany
H 1/5
H 1/6
H 1/7
Moisture Transport and Vapor Release of Concrete Structures at

Temperatures > 100 C
K. Kordina, U. Schneider, Technische Universitt Braunschweig,
Braunschweig, Fed. Rep. Germany
Moisture Transfer in a Concrete Slab
C.L.D. Huang, H.H. Siang, P.G. Kirmser, Kansas State University,
Manhattan. Kansas, U.S.A.
Creep, Strength and Thermal Expansion of Concrete at Elevated
Temperatures
M. Sakuta, H. Kasami, Y. Yoshioka, Takenaka Technical Research
Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan
Session H 2. Materials Behavior II

H 2/1
Thermal Expansion of Concrete for Nuclear Structures

S. Ziegeldorf, K. Kleiser, HK. Hilsdorf. Universitt Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Fed. Rep. Germany
The sign ("I designates Invited Lectures.

was not ava lable at the time of finishing of the book.
53
H 2/2
H 2/3
H 2/4
H 2/5
H 2/6
H 2/7
Measurements Inside the Structural Concrete of a PCPV at Elevated Temperatures

H. Zemann, sterreichische Studiengesellschaft fr Atomenergie,
Seibersdorf,
L. Weissbacher. Reaktorbau Forschungs- und BaugeseHschaft,
Effect of Nuclear Radiation on Mechanical Properties of Concrete
J. Seeberger, HK. Hilsdorf, Universitt Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Fed.
Rep. Germany
Ultimate Strength Criteria of Concrete Under Bi-axial and Triaxial Loading
G. Valente, Universit di Roma, Roma, Italy
Failure Strength and Elastic Limit for Concrete: A Comparative
Study
G. Robutti, E. Ronzoni, ISMES, Bergamo, Italy,
N. S. Ottosen, National Laboratory Ris, Roskilde, Denmark
Model Based on the Intrinsic Behaviour of the Concrete Under
Cyclical Loads for the Dynamic Analysis of Three-Dimensional
Structures
J.-D. Favrod, R. Kneuss, B. Rebora, C. Rodriguez, IPEN, Ecole Polytechnique Fdrale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Some Notes on the Dynamic Properties of Unsaturated Concrete
ST. Wu, Ebasco Services, New York, N.Y., U.S.A.
withdrawn
Session H 3. Design, Research, and Surveillance of PCVs

H 3/1*
H 3/2
H 3/3
H 3/4
H 3/5
54
Latest Developments in Prestressed Concrete Vessels for GasCooled Reactors

F.S. Ople, Jr., General Atomic Company, San Diego, California,
U.S.A.
Feasibility Study of Prestressed Concrete Pressure Vessels for
Coal Gasifiers
C.B. Oland, W.L. Greenstreet, J.P. Callahan, Oak Ridge National
Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A.
Innovations in Prestressed Concrete Pressure Vessel Design
P.Y. Chow, De Ngo, T.Y. Lin, T.Y. Lin International, San Francisco,
California, U.SA.
Surveillance of Prestressed Concrete Pressure Vessels Under
Commissioning and Operational Conditions at Hunterston ,B' Power Station
H.M. Aird, South of Scotland Electricity Board, Glasgow, U.K.
S.H. Forgie, James Williamson & Partners, Glasgow,
J.A. Holland, Rendei Palmer 8- Tritton, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K.
The Strain Behaviour of a Prestressed Concrete Reactor Pressure
Vessel after 12 Years Operation
I.W. Hornby, CEGB, Leatherhead, Surrey, U.K.
H 3/6
H 3/7
H 3/8
Grouted and Nongrouted Tendons for Prestressed Concrete Pressure Vessels

D.J. Naus, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee,
U.S.A.
Research and Development in Support of the Design of a Prestressed Concrete Pressure Vessel for a Working Pressure of 69 N/mm2
(10,000 p.s.i.)
F.K Garas, Taylor Woodrow Construction Ltd., Southall, Middlesex, U.K.
Aspects of the Design of Modern PCRV with Respect to the
H HT-Vessel
G. Schnellenbach, K. Schimmelpfennig, Ingenieurbro Prof. Zerna
St Dr. Schnellenbach, Bochum, Fed. Rep. Germany
Session H 4. Structural Analysis of PCVs and Components

H 4/1 * Experimental and Analytical Studies of Shear Behaviour of Slabs
Subjected to Multiaxial Stress Conditions
F.K. Garas, CC. Fleischer, B.R. Waine, Taylor Woodrow Construction Ltd., Southall, Middlesex, U.K.
H 4/2 An Exploration of the Design fora PCCV Head Slab with Very Large
Penetrations Using a Dynamic Relaxation Computer Program
F.K. Garas, I. LI. Davies, C C Fleischer, B.R. Waine, Taylor Woodrow Construction Ltd., Southall, Middlesex,
P.L.T. Morgan, Sir Robert McAlpine & Sons, Ltd., c./o. Nuclear Power Co. (Risley) Ltd., Risley, Warrington, Cheshire, U.K.
H 4/3
Failure Criterion of Concrete Type Material and Punching Failure
Analysis of Thick Mortar Plate
T. Ohno, Kansai Electric Power Co., Kita-ku, Nakanoshima,
M. Kuroiwa, Technical Research Center, Kansai Electric Power Co.,
Amagasakishi, Wakaogi,
M. Irobe, Nihon University, Nakamachi, Japan
H 4/4 Parametric Study on Ligament Stresses in Multi-Cavity Prestressed
Concrete Reactor Vessels (PCRVs)
S.R. Speidel, Bilfinger & Berger Bau-AG, Mannheim, Fed. Rep.
Germany
H 4/5 Test of the Second Model of the GCFR Steam Generator Cavitiy
Closure Plug
J.P.Callahan, G.C Robinson, W.G. Dodge, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A.
H 4/6 Verification of the Non-Linear Finite Element Code .ADINA Applicable to the Analysis of Heated Concrete Structures
I.G. Smith, National Engineering Laboratory, East Kilbride, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K.
H 4/7 Methods for Calculating Inelastic Response of Prestressed Concrete Pressure Vessels and Vessel Closures
D.N. Fanning, W.G. Dodge, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak
Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A.
55
H 4/8
H 4/9
Model - Including Thermal Creep Effects - for the Analysis of

Three-Dimensional Concrete Structures; Comparison with Tests
C. Rodriguez, B. Rebora, J.-D. Favrod, IPEN, Ecole Polytechnique
Fdrale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Creep Behavior Under Sustained Temperature Gradient in a Model
of Prestressed Concrete Reactor Vessels
H.Ohnuma.Y. Aoyagi, H.Abe, Central Research Institute of Electric
Power Industry, Abiko. Chiba, Japan
Session H 5. Liner and Thermal Barrier Systems

H 5/1
H 5/2
H 5/3
H 5/4
H 5/5
H 5/6
H 5/7
56
Lateral Deflection of PCRV Liners in the Plastic Range

W. Gorholt, General Atomic Company, San Diego, California.
U.S.A.
Liner Leak Simulation Tests on Prestressed Concrete Reactor
Pressure Vessels
I.W. Hornby, B.N. Grainger, CEGB Research Laboratories, Leatherhead, Surrey, U.K.
The Elastic Hot Liner-Design, Stress and Fatigue Analysis, Operation, Inspection and Repair
J. Mutzl, VEST-Alpine Montan AG, Wien,
H. Hinterleitner, Reaktorbau Forschungs- und Baugesellschaft,
Concept, Analysis and Construction of the Liner for Hot-Working
Prestressed Cast Iron Pressure Vessels
J. Gldenpfennig, L.&C Steinmller GmbH, Gummersbach, Fed.
Rep. Germany
Testing and Analysis of a High Temperature Thermal Barrier for
Gas-Cooled Reactors
W.E. Black, W.S. Betts, General Atomic Company, San Diego, California, U.S.A.,
P. Felten, CEA./CEN-Saclay, DEMT, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Testing and Analyses of a High Temperature Duct for GasCooled Reactors
W.E. Black, A. Roberge, General Atomic Company, San Diego. California, U.S.A.
P. Felten, R. Bastien, CEA/CEN-Saclay, DEMT, Gif-sur-Yvette,
France
Design of Steel-Liners and Their Anchorage with Regard to
Non-Linear Behaviour of Liner-Material and Anchorage
R. Oberpichler, Ingenieurbro Prof. Zerna - Dr. Schnellenbach,
Bochum, Fed. Rep. Germany
Session H 6. Concept and Research for a PCV with Hot Liner

H 6/1 " Concept, Construction, Testing and Operational Safety of a PCPV
with Elastic H ot Liner and Adjustable Wall Temperature
J. Nmet, Reaktorbau Forschungs und Baugesellschaft, S eibers
dorf,
K. Fritz sterreichische Studiengesellschaft fr Atomenergie, Sei
bersdorf, Austria
H 6/2 Advanced Prestressed Concrete Pressure Vessels for GasCooled
Fast Breeder Reactors
H. Kumpf, P. Rau, KraftwerkUnion AG, Erlangen, Fed. Rep. Ger
many.
H. H interleitner, J. Nmet, Reaktorbau Forschungs und Bauge
sellschaft. S eibersdorf, Austria
6/3
Feasibility of a Multicavity PCPV with Elastic H ot Liner for H TR
HG. Schwiers, HochtemperaturReaktorbau GmbH, Mannheim,
Fed. Rep. Germany,
H. H interleitner, W. Walluschek, Reaktorbau Forschungs und
Baugesellschaft, S eibersdorf, Austria
6/4 The Characteristics of the PCRV of the H H T Demonstration
Plant
J. Scheming, H.G. Schwiers, HochtemperaturReaktorbau GmbH,
Mannheim, Red. Rep. Germany
6/5 Assessment and Structural Analysis of a PCPV with H ot Liner and
Adjustable Wall Temperature
A. Nesitka, E. Ettel, M. Gangl, H . H interleitner, Reaktorbau For
schungs und Baugesellschaft, S eibersdorf, Austria
6/6 Thermal Behaviour of a PCPV with Adjustable Wall Temperature
A. Witt, sterreichische S tudiengesellschaft fr Atomenergie, S ei
bersdorf,
M. Gangl, Reaktorbau Forschungs und Baugesellschaft, S eibers
dorf,
K. Mayr, S immeringGrazPauker AG, Wien, Austria
Session H 7. Concepts and Research for a PCIV

H 7/1
H 7/2
The Particular Features of PCIVs for H TR and other Applications

in Nuclear Stations
L. Guelicher, B. Beine, S iempelkamp, Krefeld,
W. Albrecht, L.&C S teinmller GmbH, Gummersbach,
W. Jahns, Gesellschaft fr HochtemperaturreaktorTechnik, Ber
gisch Gladbach,
J. Scheming, HochtemperaturReaktorbau GmbH, Mannheim, Fed.
Rep. Germany
Criteria of Design and Analysis for Cold and H otWorking Pre
stressed Cast Iron Pressure Vessels (PCIV)
D. Bounin, E.P. Warnke, S iempelkamp, Krefeld,
H.G. Schwiers, P. Mitterbacher, HochtemperaturReaktorbau
GmbH, Mannheim, Fed. Rep. Germany
57
H 7/3
H 7/4
H 7/5
Design, Construction and Pressure Test of a PCIV Gas Storage

Vessel for the THTR-300
E.K. Lethert, H.J. Wester, Siempelkamp, Krefeld,
H.G. Schwiers, Hochtemperatur-Reaktorbau GmbH, Mannheim,
Fed. Rep. Germany
Structural Analysis of Cellular Blocks for a Prestressed Cast Iron
Reactor Pressure Vessel
R.G. Thomas, U.KA.EA., Culcheth, Warrington,
J.L. Head, Imperial College, London, UK.
Ultrasonic Testing of Large Blocks for Prestressed Cast Iron Pressure Vessels
H.-A. Stelling, Staatliches Materialprfungsamt NW, Dortmund,
Fed. Rep. Germany
Session H 8. Concept and Research for a PCV

for the LMFBR
H 8/1*
H 8/2
H 8/4
H 8/5
H 8/6
H 8/7
58
Transient Analysis of LMFBR Reinforced/Prestressed Concrete

Containment
A.H. Marchertas, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois,
T.B. Belytschko, Z.P. Bazant, Northwestern University, Evanston,
Illinois, U.S.A.
Comparison of Transient PCRV Model Test Results with Analysis
A.H. Marchertas, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois,
T.B. Belytschko, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois,
USA.
Local Thermal and Structural Behavior of Concrete at Elevated
Temperatures
E.L. Gluekler, General Electric Co., Advanced Reactor Systems Department, Sunnyvale, California, U.S.A.
Design and Development of a High Thermal Conductivity Concrete
for the Sodium Cooled Fast Reactor
R. Blundell, S. Kupermann, Taylor Woodrow Construction Ltd.,
Southall, Middlesex,
K. Albeson, W. Blair, Nuclear Power Co. (Risley) Ltd., Risley,
Warrington, U.K.
Thermal and Thermal Stress Analysis of a Pool Type LMFBR Deck
Structure
M. Stephenson, H. Ahmed, D. Ma, Argonne National Laboratory,
Argonne, Illinois, U.S.A.
Speculations on the Design of a Containment Vessel with a Hot Liner for Use with Fast Reactor Systems
I.LI. Davies, Taylor Woodrow Construction Ltd., Southall, Middlesex,
P.H.H. Wolff, Nuclear Power Co. (Whetstone) Ltd., Whetstone, Leicester, U.K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Division J. LOADING CONDITIONS AND STRUCTURAL
ANALYSIS OF REACTOR CONTAINMENT
Session J 1. General Design Criteria and Containment

Selection
J 1/1*
J 1/2
J 1/4
J 1/5
J 1/6
J 1/9
Current Summary of International Extreme Load Design Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Facilities
J.D. Stevenson, J.D. Stevenson Consultants, Cleveland, Ohio,
U.S.A.
Evaluation of Load Combination Equations for ASME Section III
Division 1 Components
S.W. Tagart, Jr., Nuclear Services Corporation, Campbell, California, U.S.A.
A Probabilistic Approach to the Design of Nuclear Containment
Structures
P. Petrin, Sargenta LundyEngineers, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Risks of Nuclear Containment Structures due to Aircraft Crashes
and Earthquake Loadings
J. Bauer, Technische Universitt Mnchen, Mnchen Fed. Rep.
Germany
withdrawn
Design and Construction of the Prestressed Concrete Containments of the French Standard 900 MWe PWR
R. Bordet, J.L. Costaz, J.F. Laboudigue, Electricit de France, SEPTEN, Paris, France
Experience in the Safety Assessment of the SNR-300-Containment
J. Langhans, Gesellschaft fr Reaktorsicherheit, Kln, Fed. Rep.
Germany

59
Session J 2. BWR Containment Design

J 2/1*
Design Loads, Loading Combinations and Structural Acceptance

Criteria for BWR Containments in the United States
N.W. Edwards, NUTECH, Inc., San Jose, California, U.S.A.
J 2/4
A Theoretical and Experimental Study of the Structural Responses to Safety/Relief Valve Discharge Loads
T. Henriksson, J. Fredell, ASEA-ATOM, Vsters, Sweden
J 2/6
MARK II Containment Dynamic Analysis and Assessment for Hydrodynamic Loads

M. Michail. G. Shah, L.-O Hua, Bechtel Power Corporation, San
Francisco, California, U.S.A.
withdrawn
Response of a BWR MARK II Containment Structure to Chugging
Loads
B. Bedrosian, M. Ettouney, Burns & Roe, Inc., Woodbury, New
York, USA.
Structural Dynamic Analysis of SRVA Loads for BWR MARK III
Containment System
H.O Han, C.J. Lin. Gilbert Associates, Inc., Reading, Pennsylvania,
U.S.A.
Mathematical Modeling of a MARK lll/BWR-6 Containment for
LOCA and SRV Analysis
P.A. Larkin, R.E. Stoner, R.L. Beck.T.F. Huang, Bechtel Power Corporation. Gaithersburg, Maryland, U.S.A.
J 2/7
J 2/8
J 2/9
Session J 3. Concrete Containment Design and Analysis

J 3/1
J 3/2
J 3/3
J 3/4
J 3/5
60
Application of the Split-Rigidity Concept to Concrete Cracking in

Reactor Containment Design
K.P. Buchert, S.K. Sen, Bechtel Power Corporation, Gaithersburg,
Maryland, U.S.A.
Behaviour of Concrete Containment under Over-Pressure Conditions
R.J. Atchison, G.J.K. Asmis, F.R. Campbell, Atomic Energy Control
Board, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Effect of Crack Formation Process and Tension Stiffening on Thermal Stresses Relaxation in Reinforced Concrete Containments
G. Macchi, Universit di Pavia, Pavia,
D. Sangalli, Studio Tecnico Macchi-Papini e C s.a.s.. Mi/ano,
Italy
Effective Tensile Stiffening in Prestressed Concrete Wall Segments
L. Chitnuyanondh, S. Rizkalla, D.W. Murray, J.G. MacGregor,
University of A/berta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Modelling and Predicting Behavior of Prestressed Concrete
Secondary Containment Structures Using BOSOR 5
D.W. Murray, L. Chitnuyanondh, C. Wong, University of Alberta,
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
J 3/7
J 3/8
J 3/9
J 3/10
J3/11
Analysis of Concrete Containments for Non-Linear Strain Gradients

A. Walser, D.J. Carreira, Sargenta Lundy Engineers, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Computer Plotting and Calculation of Containment Prestressing
Cables
.. Benamou, Electricit de France, SEPTEN, Paris,
.. Picaut, P. Pouyet, Coyne & Bellier, Paris, France
Lateral Rigidity of Cracked Concrete Structures
A. Castellani, C. Chesi, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
Thermo-Elastic Stress Analysis of Containment Wall Penetrations
Using Improved Finite Element Formulation
D.T. Ramani, A. Dimopoulos, Sargent & Lundy Engineers, Inc.,
Chicago, Illinois, U.SA.
B. M. Hegl in, Beratung fr Statik, Dynamik und Energie, Drten,
Switzerland
Elastoplastic Analysis of Internally Pressurized ,Cut-andCover
Type Underground Nuclear Reactor Containments
G. Mahrenholtz, Technische Universitt Hannover, Hannover, Fed.
Rep. Germany,
D.V. Reddy, W. Bobby, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St.
Johns, Newfoundland, Canada
Session J 4. Concrete Containment: - Testing Behavior

J 4/1 *
J 4/2
J 4/4
J 4/5
Design Concept of Concrete Containment Vessels for Shear and

Thermal Stresses
K. Ichikawa, Shimizu Construction Co., Ltd., Tokyo,
Y. Aoyagi, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry,
Abiko-City, Chiba,
Y. Watanabe, The Japan Atomic Power Company, Tokyo, Japan
A Test of a Model of a Thin-Walled Prestressed Concrete Secondary Containment Structure
S. Rizkalla, S.H. Simmonds, J.G. MacGregor, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Containment Models under the
Combined Action of Internal Pressure and Lateral Force
T. Uchida, N. Ohmori, T. Takahashi, S. Watanabe, Kajima Institute
of Construction Technology, Tokyo,
H. Abe, Y. Aoyagi, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, Abiko-shi, Chiba, Japan
Behaviours of Reinforced Concrete Containment Models Under
Thermal Gradient and Internal Pressure
Y. Aoyagi, H. Ohnuma, Central Research Institute of Electric
Power Industry, Abiko-shi, Chiba
Y. Yoshioka, K. Okada, M. Ueda, Takenaka Technical Research Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan
61
J 4/6
J 4/7
J 4/8
J 4/9
Design Method of Shell Wall End of Reinforced Concrete Containment Vessel (RCCV) Against Radial Shear
Abiko City, Chiba,
O Isobata, N. Tanaka, Shimizu Construction Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
An Experimental Approach to the Design of Network Reinforcement Against In-plane Shear in Reinforced Concrete Containments
Abiko City, Chiba,
K. Yamada, Technical Research Laboratory of Maeda Construction
Company, Tokyo, Japan
Results of Strength Tests on a 1:10 Model of Reactor Containment
K. Donten, M. Knauff, A. Sadowski, W. Scibak, Po/itechnika
Warszawska, Warsaw, Poland
Ductility and Failure of Net-Reinforced Concrete Shell Walls
Z.P. Bazant, P. Gambarova, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, U.S.A.
Session J 5. Design and Analysis of Salbs and Structures

J 5/2
Static and Dynamic Analysis of Reactor Containment Base Mat

on Elastic Foundation under Transient Loads
T. Yamakawa, Research Laboratory of Shimizu Construction Co.,
Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
J 5/4
Plate on Elastic Foundation Subject to Thermal Loading

H.D.Tabakman, Y.J. Lin, Bechtel Power Corporation, Los Angeles,
California, U.S.A.
Self Limiting Loads for Concrete Structures
L. Lazzeri, F. Bozzo, AMN S.p.A., Genova,
A. Berro, G.A. Righetti, Universit di Genova, Genova, Italy
Analysis of Drywell Floor Slab for Random Lateral LOCA Loads on
Downcomers
M.P. Singh, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,
Blacksburg, Virginia,
S. Singh, M. Valathur, Sargent & Lundy, Engineers, Inc. Chicago,
Illinois, U.S.A.
Inelastic Analysis and Design of Ductile Structures Submitted to
Induced Vibrations of Extreme Events
R. Danisch, U. Graubner, Kraftwerk Union AG, Erlangen, Fed. Rep.
Germany
J 5/6
J 5/7
J 5/8
62
Session J 6. Structural and Leak Testing and Design of

Containment Components
J 6/1
J 6/3
J 6/5*
J 6/6
J 6/7
J 6/8
J 6/9
A Containment Wall with Integrated Venting

D. Costes, CE.A./Dpartement de Sret Nuclaire, Fontenayaux-Roses, France
A Realistic Structural Analysis of the Integrity of the Liner of Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Containments
F. Buchhardt, P. Brandi, Bundesanstalt fr Materialprfung (BAM),
Berlin (West), Germany
Performance of Scandinavian BWR-Containrnents During Pressure Tests
A. Engelbrektson, VBB Vattenbyggnadsbyran, Stockholm,
K. Boye-Mller, Swedish State Power Board, Vllingby, Sweden
Stability Investigations of Spherical Steel Shell Containment
A. Andersen, S. Bantle, L.M. Habip, Kraftwerk Union AG, Frankfurt am Main, Fed. Rep. Germany
Experimental Study of a Spherical PWR-Containment with
Geometrical Imperfections at the Welds
F.W. Bornscheuer, Universitt Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Fed. Rep. Germany
Optimization of the Containment Nozzles
A. Andersen, S. Bantle, Kraftwerk Union AG, Frankfurt am Main,
Fed. Rep. Germany
Elasto-Plastic Analysis of Nozzle Intersections in Reactor Containments
J.M. Sttele, E. Ramm, F.W. Bornscheuer, Universitt Stuttgart,
Stuttgart, Fed. Rep. Germany
Session J 7. Impact Load Analysis and Design I

J 7/1 *
J 7/2
J 7/3
J 7/4
Test and Calculation of the Local Behaviour of Concrete Structures

under Missile Impact
C. Berriaud, P. Verpeaux, A. Hoffmann, CEA /CEN-Saclay DEMT,
Gif-sur-Yvette,
P. Jamet, CEA./CEN-Saclay STA, Gif-sur-Yvette
R. Avet-Flancard, CEA. ICEN, DSR, Fontenay-aux-Roses,
France
Impact and Impulsive Loading on Thin Shell Structures
Y. Crutzen, Commission of the European Communities, J.R.C.
Experimental Investigation of Reinforced Concrete Behaviour due
to Impact Load
K. Brandes, E. Limberger, J. Herter, Bundesanstalt fr Materialprfung (BAM), Berlin (West), Germany
Inelastic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Slabs Subjected to Impact Loads - Experimental and Numerical Analysis
J.L. Costaz, J. Dulac, J.F. Laboudigue, Electricit de France, SEPTEN, Paris, France
63
J 7/5
Impact Testing of Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete Slabs with Liner

F. Stanqenberg, Ingenieurbro Prof. Zerna - Dr. Schellenbach,
Bochum,
P. Buttmann, Brown Boveri & Cie AG, Mannheim, Fed. Rep.
Germany
J 7/6
Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Barriers Subject to the Impact of

Turbine Missiles
P.M. McMahon, S.K. Sen, B.L. Meyers, Bechtel Power Corporation,
Gaithersburg, Maryland, U.S.A.
J 7/9
Analysis of the Overall Structural Behavior due to the Impact of Deformable Missiles
M.M. Ettouney, R.R. Radini, P.S. Hsueh, Burns & Roe, Inc., Woodbury, New York, U.S.A.
J 7/11 Energy Absorbing Missile Barrier Systems
A. Danay, J.H.K. Tang, J.J. Deans, Ontario Hydro, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Session J 8. Impact Load Analysis and Design II

J 8/1
J 8/2
J 8/3
J 8/4
J 8/5
J 8/6*
64
Scaling Laws Applied to Impact Testing and Computer Assessments Made to Compare Tests at Two Scales
I.LI. Davies, D. Carlton, Taylor Woodrow Construction Ltd., Southall, Middlesex,
T.P. O'Brien, Atomic Weapons Research Establishment, Foulness,
Essex, U.K.
Function Behavior of a Gas-Operated Accelerator for Kinetic
Energy Projectiles
H. Heine, Meppen, Fed. Rep. Germany
Dynamic Measurements During the Test Series with the GasOperated Accelerator at Meppen
H.J. Weithuser, Meppen, Fed. Rep. Germany
Response of Reinforced Concrete Targets to Impacting Soft
Missiles. An FRGMRT-UKAEA Co-operation in Tests to Validate Computer Codes and Scaling Laws
F. Sage, UKAEA, Safety and Reliability Directorate, Culcheth, Warrington, Lancashire, U.K.,
A. Pfeiffer, Ges. fr Reaktorsicherheit, Kln, Fed. Rep. Germany
Experimental Investigations to Determine the Kinetic Ultimate
Bearing Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Slabs Subject to Deformable Missiles
W. Jonas, R. Meschkat, H. Riech, E. Rdiger, Hochtief AG, Frankfurt/Main, Fed. Rep. Germany
Approximate Calculation of the Impact of Missiles onto Reinforced Concrete Structures and Comparison of Test Results
W. Jonas, R. Meschkat, H. Riech, E. Rdiger, Hochtief AG,
Frankfurt IMain, F.R. Germany
J 8/7
J 8/8
J 8/9
J 8/11
J 8/12
Local Failure of Reinforced Concrete under Missile Impact Loading

M.L. Brown, N. Curtress, J. Jowett, UKAEA, Safety and Reliability
Directorate, Culcheth, Warrington, Cheshire, U.K.
Experimental Validation of the EURDYN and CADROS Finite Element Codes for the Calculation of Metal Target Response to LowVelocity Missiles
A.J. Neilson, P.G. Carter, UKAEA, Atomic Energy Establishment,
Winfrith, Dorchester, Dorset, U.K.
Experimental Study on Strength of Steel Plates Subjected to
Missile Impact
H. Miyamoto, Science University of Tokyo, Noda-shi, Chiba,
S. Shida, N. Chiba, Hitachi Research Laboratory, Hitachi Ltd.,
Ibaraki,
S. Ohte, H. Yoshizawa, Toshiba R Et D Center, Toshiba Corporation, Kawasaki-shi, Japan
Fall of a 75 ton Fuel Element Container in a Storage Pool and the
Subsequent Loading of the Pool Walls
C.J.L. Florie, Physics International, Gouda,
H. v.d. Ree, Bredero's Bouwbedrijf Nederland B.V., Utrecht,
M.J. v.d. Hoek, Physics International, Gouda, The Netherlands
Full Scale Turbine-Missile Casing Exit Tests
withdrawn
H.R. Yoshimura, J.T. Schamaun, Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico,
G.E. Sliter, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California,
U.SA.
Session J 9. Aircraft Impact Load

J 9/1
J 9/2
J 9/3
J 9/4
Analyses of Critical Structures and Contained Equipment for

Aircraft Impact Loadings
H. Kamil, G. Kost, R. Sharpe, Engineering Decision Analysis
Company, Inc., Palo Alto, California, U.SA.,
N.J. Krutzik, Kraftwerk Union AG, Offenbach (Main),
S. Shankar, Engineering Decision Company, Inc., Frankfurt (Main),
Fed. Rep. Germany
A Critical Reappraisal of Nuclear Power Plant Safety against Accidental Aircraft Impact
J.D. Riera, Curso de Ps-Graduaco em Engenharia Civil, Porto
Alegre, RS, Brazil
The Effect of Crash Zones in the Design of Nuclear Structures
K.-J. Pittner, Babcock-Brown Boveri Reaktor GmbH, Mannheim,
J. Bauer, H. Kappler, G.I. Schuller, Technische Universitt Mnchen, Mnchen, Fed. Rep. Germany
Numerical Analysis of the Local and Global Structural Response
of a Reactor Building Under Airplane Crash Loading
J.F. Chedmail, J.C. Bianchini, J. Dubois, Engineering System International S.A., Rungis-Silic, France
J.D. Renard, Electrobel S.A., Bruxelles, Belgium
65
J 9/5
J 9/6
J 9/7
J 9/8
Analysis of the Behaviour of a Concrete Structure due to an Air

plane Impact and the Effects of the Reinforcements
H. v.d. Ree, Bredero's Bouwbedrijf Nederland B.V., Utrecht,
M.J. v.d. Hoek, Physics International, Gouda, The Netherlands
Comparison of Response Spectra for Aircraft Impact Calculated
by a BeamModel and a 3DShellModel
J. Krivy, W.M. Kuntze, Gesellschaft fr Reaktorsicherheit, Kln,
Fed. Rep. Germany
Airplane Crash and External Explosions Design Standards in the
Federal Republic of Germany
M. Bork, G. Philip, Kerntechnischer Ausschu (KTA)Geschfts
stelle bei der GRS , Kln, Fed. Rep. Germany
Nonlinear Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Shells under Aircraft
Impact
F. Linder, Consultant, Lemgo,
N.J. Krutzik, G. Winkel, Kraftwerk Union AG, Offenbach (Main), Fed.
Rep. Germany
Session J 10. Impulsive Load Analysis and Design

J 10/1* Evaluation of H azards from Industrial Activities near Nuclear
Power Plants. Deterministic and Probabilistic Studies
A. Lannoy, lectricit de France, Direction des Etudes et Recher
ches, Saint Denis,
T. Gobert, lectricit de France, Direction de l'Equipement, Paris,
France
J 10/2 On the Dynamic Analysis of Axisymmetric Structures Considering
NonAxisymmetric Concentrated Masses
K.H. Schrader, RuhrUniversitt Bochum, Bochum,
. Kaiser, Ingenieurbro Dynamik spezieller S trukturen, Frank
furt/Main,
N.J. Krutzik, KraftwerkUnion AG., Offenbach/Main, Fed. Rep. Ger
many
J 10/4
J 10/5
J 10/6
J 10/7
66
Response of Containment Structures to Air Blast

CA. Kot, P. Turula, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois,
U.S.A.
Response of an Embedded Reactor Containment to Underground
Blast Loading
Y. Kivity, D. Golan, S igolev Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel
Finite Element Analysis of Reactor Containments under Blast Loa
ding
O.K. Kiciman, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
Pressure Vessel Rupture and Resulting PressureWaveLoading of
Surrounding Concrete Structures Calculated with the PISCES 2
DELKCode
V. Koch, TVBaden, Mannheim,
W. Pohl, Control Data GmbH, Frankfurt/Main, Fed. Rep. Germany
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Division K. SEISM IC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF
NUCLEAR POWER PLANT SYSTEM S
K(a) Session K 1 . Ground M otion
K 1/1* Analyses on Various Parameters for the Simulation of Three
dimensional Earthquake Ground Motions
M. Watabe, Building Research Institute, Ibaraki,
M. Tohdo, Toda Construction Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
K 1/2
Generation of Simulated Threedimensional Earthquake Ground
Motions
M. Watabe, Building Research Institute, Ibaraki,
0. Chiba, M. Tohdo, Toda Construction Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
K 1/3
Primary Variables Influencing Generation of Earthquake Motions
by a Deconvolution Process
I.M. Idriss, M.R. Akky, WoodwardClyde Consultants, S an Francis
co, California, U.S A.
K 1/4
Phase Characteristics of Earthquake Accelerogram and Its Appli
cation
Y. Ohsaki, R. Iwasaki, I. Ohkawa, University of Tokyo, Tokyo,
T. Masao, Nuclear Power Plant Division, Fujita Corporation, Tokyo,
Japan
K 1/5
Artificial Accelerograms for Multiaxial Earthquake Excitation
P. Degen, MotorColumbus Consulting Engineers, Inc., Baden,
Switzerland
withdrawn
K 1/6
Input Criterion for Seismic Analysis of Nuclear Power Plants
D.C. Gupta, PK. Agrawal, S. Singh, S argent & Lundy Engineers,
Chicago, Illinois, U.S .A.
K Ml H ysteresis Behaviour of Soils and Rocks
T. Hueckel, Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Fundamental
Technological Research, Warsaw, Poland
R. Nova, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
K 1/8
A Model for Soil Behavior under Monotonie and Cyclic Loading
Conditions
Y.F. Dafalias, University of California, Davis, California, U.S.A.
K 1/9
On the Effects of Using Wide Range Earthquakes
S. Cecconi, V. Giuliano, L. Lazzeri, AMN S .pA., Genova,
G. Pezzi, Universit di Genova, Genova, Italy
K 1/10 A Class of Models for Identification and Simulation of Earthquake
Ground Motions
R.M. Oliver, K.S. Pister, University of California, Berkeley, Califor
nia, U.S.A.
The sign () designates Invited Lectures.

67
Session K 2. Risk Analysis I

K 2/1*
K 2/2
K 2/3
K 2/4
K 2/5
K 2/6
K 2/7
K 2/8
Probabilistic Seismic Safety Study of an Existing Nuclear Power

Plant
R.P. Kennedy, R.D. Campbell, Engineering Decision Analysis
Company, Irvine, California,
CA. Cornell, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,
Massachusetts,
H.F. Perla, Pickard, Lowe and Garrick, Inc., Irvine, California,
USA.
Probabilistic Approach of Reference Seismic Ground Motions
D. Costes, CE.A./CEN-DSN, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
Probabilistic Evaluation of the SSE Design Spectrum for a Nuclear
Power Plant Site: A Case Study
R. Wheaton, A. Vaish, EDS Nuclear, Inc., San Francisco, California,
C.B. Crouse, Fugro, Inc., Long Beach, California,
R. Guzman, Consultant, Long Beach, California, U.S.A.
A Method for the Estimation of the Probability of Damage due to
Earthquakes
M.A.H.G. Alderson, UKAEA Safety and Reliability Directorate, Culcheth, Warrington, U.K.
Probability of Failure of Piping Designed to Seismically Induced
Emergency and Faulted Condition Limits
M. Gorman, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio,
J.D. Stevenson, J.D. Stevenson Consultants, Cleveland, Ohio,
U.S.A.
On a Method of Evaluation of Failure Rate of Equipment and Pipings under Excess-Earthquake Loadings
H. Shibata, Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo,
H. Okamura, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
KTA 2201 - Seismic Design Standards in the Federal Republic of
Germany
G. Philip, M. Bork, Kerntechnischer Ausschu (KTA)-Geschftsstelle, Kln, Fed. Rep. Germany
The MCE (Maximum Credible Earthquake) - An Approach to Reduction of Seismic Risk
G.J.K. Asmis, R.J. Atchison, Atomic Energy Control Board, Ottawa,
Ontario, Canada
Session K 3. Risk Analysis II

K 3/1 * An Overview of the Seismic Safety Margins Research Program
R.D. Smith F.J. Tokarz, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, California, U.S.A.
K 3/2
Systems Analysis Methods Used in the Seismic Safety Margins
Research Program
G.E. Cummings, J.E. Wells, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, California, U.S.A.
68
K 3/3
Development of Seismic Input for Use in the Seismic Safety Mar

gins Research Program
D.L. Bernreuter, D.H. Chung, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Li
vermore, California, U.S.A.
3/4
Expert Opinion Encoding in Seismic Hazard Analysis
OP. Mortgat, KW. Campbell, TERA Corporation, Berkeley, Cali
fornia,
D.L. Bernreuter, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, Cali
fornia, U.S.A.
3/5
Attenuation Relationships of Peak Ground Acceleration Versus
Magnitude and Distance Considering Magnitude and Distance as
Random Variables
C. P. Mortgat, TERA Corporation, Berkeley, California,
D.L. Bernreuter, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, Cali
fornia, U.S.A.
3/6
Soil Structure Interaction Analysis for the US NRC Seismic Safety
Margins Research Program
J.J. Johnson, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, Califor
nia, U.S.A.
3/7
Major Structural Response Methods Used in the Seismic Safety
Margins Research Program
CK. Chou, T.Y. Lo, V.N. Vagliente, Lawrence Livermore Laborato
ry, Livermore, California, U.SA.
3/8
Subsystem Response Determination lor the US NRC Seismic Sa
fety Margins Research Program
J.J. Johnson, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, Califor
nia, U.S.A.
3/9
Definition of Component and Structural Fragility for Use in the
Seismic Safety Margins Research Program
R.G. Dong, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, California,
USA.
3/10 Reserve Seismic Capacity Determination of a Nuclear Power Plant
Braced Frame with Piping
T.A. Nelson, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, Califor
nia, U.S.A.
Session 4. Design Concepts

4/1 *
K 4/2
On Fundamental Concept of Anti-Earthquake Design of Equipment

and Pipings
H. Shibata, Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, To
kyo,
M. Kato, Japan Atomic Power Company, Tokyo, Japan
Integrated Structural Design of Nuclear Power Plants for High
Seismic Areas
P.J. Rieck, Gilbert Associates, Inc., Reading, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
69
K 4/3
K 4/4
K 4/5
K 4/6
K 4/7
Concepts for Seismic Response Attenuation of Nuclear Power

Plant Containments
R.P. Kennedy, Engineering Decision Analysis Company, Irvine, California,
P.J. Richter, Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc., Irvine, California,
W.A. von Riesemann, Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, U.S.A.
Alternative Structural Systems for High Density Fuel Storage Racks
in Existing Facilities
J.W. Reed, F.A. Webster, Engineering Decision Analysis Co., Inc.,
Palo Alto, California,
P.C. Sun, Nuclear Energy Operation, General Electric Co., San
Jose, California, U.SA.
Considerations in the Design of Nuclear Power Plants in High Seismic Regions. Part 1: Station Arrangements. Part 2: Component
Qualification
A.K. Banerjee, M.B. Stetson, CF. Reeves, Sfone & Webster
Engineering Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
An Investigation into Seismic Design Feasibility of Pool-Type
LMFBR's
N. Pal, M. Dostal, General Electric Company, Advanced Reactor
Systems Department, Sunnyvale, California, U.SA.
Probabilistic Seismic Fluid-Structure Interaction of Floating
Nuclear Plants Platforms
M. Arockiasamy, P.V. Thangam Babu, D.V. Reddy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. Johns, Newfoundland, Canada
Session K 5. Soil-Structure Interaction I

K 5/1*
K 5/2
K 5/3
K 5/4
70
Travelling Wave Effects in Soil-Structure Interaction

J.P. Wolf, P. Obernhuber, Electrowatt Engineering Services Ltd.,
Zrich, Switzerland
Seismic Input for Soil Structure Interaction Analysis
E. Berger, Dames & Moore, Inc., San Francisco, California,
H.B. Seed, University of California, Berkeley, California, U.S.A.,
J.D. Renard, Electrobel S.A., Bruxelles, Belgium
Soil-Structure Interaction: Modeling Effects on Structural Response
P. Arnold, N.J. Krutzik, Kraftwerk Union AG, Offenbach, Fed. Rep.
Germany
Investigation of the Treatment of Damping in Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis
H. Kamil, G. Kost, R. Sharpe, Engineering Decision Analysis Company, Inc., Palo Alto, California, U.S.A.
K 5/5
Comparison of SoilStructure Interaction by Different Ground

Models
T. Takemori, Y. Kuwabara, Y. Ogiwara, A. Suwabe, Taisei Corpo
ration, Tokyo,
K. Tanaka, Kyushu Electric Power Company, Kyushu, Japan
5/6
Torsional Structural Response from FreeField Ground Motion

P.C. Lam, General Motors Institute, Detroit, Michigan,
R.J. Scavuzzo, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, U.S.A.
Seismic Design Method for Arbitrary Propagating Waves
M.M. Ettouney, J.A. Brennan, A.A. Agero, Burns and Roe, Inc.,
Woodbury, New York, U.S .A.
5/7
Session 6. Soil-Structure Interaction II

6/1*
6/3
6/4
6/5
6/6
6/7
6/8
6/9
Soil Structure Interaction Analyses by Different Methods

G. Waas, W. Weber, Hochtief AG, Frankfurt am Main, Fed. Rep.
Germany
Dynamic Interaction of Adjacent Structures Founded on Layered
Soil
G. Waas, Hochtief AG, Frankfurt am Main, Fed. Rep. Germany
The Influence of Uplift and Sliding Nonlinearities on Seismic Re
sponse of a Small Test Reactor Building
L.J. Cofer, H . Kamil, R.L. Sharpe, Engineering Decision Analysis
Company, Inc.. Palo Alto, California,
D. Hoggatt, General Electric Company, Vallecitos Nuclear Center,
Pleasanton, California, U.S .A.
StructuretoStructure Interaction Analysis for a Nuclear Power
Plant
C. Mueller, H. Furrer, Motor Columbus Consulting Engineers, Inc.,
Baden, S witzerland
BuildingSoilBuilding Interaction in Seismic Analysis of Nuclear
Power Plants
A. Del Grosso, D. Stura, C. Vardanega, Universit di Genova,
Genova, Italy
The Finite Element Complex Response Method for Solving Prob
lems of Embedded Multiple Structures
J.V. Parker, K.M. Ahmed, Nuclear Power Company (Risley) Limited,
Risley, Warrington, Cheshire, U.K.
Investigation of the Influence of Interaction of Two Adjacent Struc
tures on Their Responses
A. Gantayat, H . Kamil, G. Kost, Engineering Decision Analysis
Company, Palo A/to, California, U.S A.,
N. Krutzik, Kraftwerk Union AG, Offenbach,
D.H. Rutherford, Engineering Decision Analysis Company, Frank
furt (Main), Fed. Rep. Germany
Nonlinear Analysis of a Deeply Embedded Power Plant Building
Subjected to Earthquake Load
S.N. Mukherjee, Brown, Boveri & Cie, Baden, S witzerland
71
Session K 7. Underground Structures

K 7/1 *
K 7/2
K 7/3
K 7/4
K 7/5
K 7/6
K 7/7
K 7/8
K 7/9
72
Earthquake Response of Nuclear Reactor Building Deeply Embedded in Soil

T. Masao, Y. Takasaki, Fujita Corporation, Yokohama,
S. Yamamoto. Y. Koori, Chiyoda Chemical Engineering & Construction Corporation, Kawasaki, Japan
Seismic Response Comparisons for an Embedded High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR) on a High Seismic Site
W. Schlafer, III, D. Tow, General Atomic Company, San Diego, California,
J.J. Johnson, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, California, U.S.A.
Seismic Stresses in Buried Piping of Arbitrary Configuration
J.J. Deans, J.H.K. Tang, Ontario Hydro, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Seismic Design of Long Underground Structures
S.N. Pagay, F. Loceff, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, PWR
System Division, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Analytical and Experimental Investigation of the Dynamic Response of Underground Nuclear Power Plants
G.E. Howard, P. Ibez, ANCO Engineers, Inc., Santa Monica,
California, U.SA.
Seismic Response Analysis for a Deeply Embedded Nuclear Power
Plant
W.W.H. Chen, Bechtel National, Inc., San Francisco, California,
M. Chatterjee, Bechtel Power Corporation, San Francisco, California,
S.M. Day, Systems, Science, and Software, La Jolla, California,
U.SA.
Inelastic Seismic Analysis of a Deeply Embedded Reinforced Concrete Reactor Building
M. Celebi, M. Chatterjee, Bechtel Power Corporation, San Francisco, California,
K. Mark, Bechtel National, Inc., San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
Experimental and Analytical Studies of a Deeply Embedded
Reactor Building Model Considering Soil-Building Interaction
(Part I)
H. Tanaka, Tokyo Electric Power Co., Ltd., Tokyo,
T. Ohta, S. Uchiyama, Kajima Institute of Construction Technology,
Tokyo, Japan
Seismic Response of the ' Cut-and-Cover' Type Reactor Containments Considering Nonlinear Soil Behavior
H. El-Tahan, D.V. Reddy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St.
John's, Newfoundland, Canada
K(b) Session K 8. Response of Structures

K 8/1*
K 8/2
K 8/3
K 8/4
K 8/5
K 8/6
K 8/7
K 8/8
K 8/9
The Uncoupling Criteria for Subsystem Seismic Analysis

C. Chen, Gilbert/Commonwealth Companies, Reading, Pennsyl
vania, U.S .A.
Towards Safe and Economic Seismic Design of Cooling Towers of
Extreme H eight
W.E. Krtzig, K. Meskouris, RuhrUniversitt Bochum, Bochum,
Fed. Rep. Germany
Response of a Nonlinear System to Various Spectral Excitation
Time Decompositions
J. Curreri, P. Bezler, B. Koplik, H . Goradia, Brookhaven National
Laboratory, Upton, New York, U.S .A.
Critical Seismic Response of Nuclear Reactors
R.F. Drenick, P.C. Wang, C.B. Yun, A.J. Philippacopoulos, Poly
technic Institute of New York, Brooklyn, New York, U.S .A.
Nonlinear Analysis of a BWR Reactor Building Subjected to Both
Thermal and Earthquake Loadings
K. Muto, T. Tsugawa, Muto Institute of S tructural Mechanics, Ka
jima Corp., Tokyo,
S. Aihara, K. Ujiie, Kajima Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
Fatigue Analysis Method for Seismic Structural Response
A. Kurosaki, M. Kozeki, Mitsui Engineering and S hipbuilding Co.,
Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
Seismic Response of a Structure Subjected to Rotational Base Ex
citation
W.H. Guilinger, V.N. Shah, G.J. Bhm, Westinghouse Electric Cor
poration, PWR S ystems Division, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
U.S.A.
Combination of Torsional, Rotational and Translational Responses
in the Seismic Analysis of a Nuclear Power Plant
A. Morrone, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Advanced Reac
tors Division, Madison, Pennsylvania,
G.B. Sigal, Burns and Roe, Inc., Oradell, New Jersey, U.S .A.
Mutual Pounding of Adjacent Structures During Earthquakes
J.P. Wolf, P.E. Skrikerud, Electrowatt Engineering S ervices Ltd.,
Zrich, S witzerland
Session K 9. Floor Response Analysis

K 9/1*
9/2
9/3
Equipment Response Spectra for Nuclear Power Plant Sys

tems
J.L. Sackman, J.M.Kelly, University of California, Berkeley, Califor
nia, U.S.A.
On the Seismic Design Spectra for H eavy Components and Com
parisons with the Usual FRS Techniques
S. Cecconi, V. Giuliano, L. Lazzeri, AMN S .pA., Genova, Italy
On Upperbound Instructure Response Spectra
T.S. Atalik, Bechtel Espana, S.A., Madrid, Spain
73
K 9/4
9/5
Floor Response Spectra Considering Elasto-Plastic Behaviour of

Nuclear Power Facilities
T. Kawakatsu, The Kansai Electric Power Company,
K. Kitade, Mitsubishi Atomic Power Industries, Inc., Tokyo,
T. Takemori, Y. Kuwabara, Y. Ogiwara, Taisei Corporation, Tokyo,
Japan
Direct Methods to Calculate Seismic Floor Response Spectra
F. Jeanpierre, M. Livolant, F. Roullier, CEA./CEN-Saclay DEMT,
Session 10. Response of Piping and Equipment I

10/1* Effect of Energy Absorbing Supports on Seismic Pipe Stresses
G.H. Powell, D.G. Row, University of California, Berkeley, Califor
nia, USA.
10/2 Comparison of Multiple Support Excitation Solution Techniques
for Piping Systems
K.-R. Leimbach, Consultant, Bochum-Linden,
.P. Sterkel, Kraftwerk Union AG, Offenbach (Main), Fed. Rep.
Germany
10/3 ,.Missing Mass" Correction in Modal Analysis of Piping Systems
G.H. Powell, University of California, Berkeley, California, U.S.A.
10/4 Residual Load Method for Modal Analysis of Piping Systems Sub
jected to Seismic Excitation
G. Krause, Brown, BoveriS Cie. AG, Mannheim, Fed. Rep. Germany
10/5 Beam Versus Shell Seismic Analysis of Large Diameter Thin Walled
LMFBR Piping
N. Pal, General Electric Company, Advanced Reactor Systems De
partment, Sunnyvale, California,U.S.A.
S. Mizuno, Hitachi Ltd., Hitachi City, Japan
10/6 Design of Prequalif ied Support Systems Subjected to Dynamic Lo
ads
R.D. Raheja, F.L.Cho, A.E. Meligi, Sargenta Lundy Engineers, Chi
cago, Illinois, U.S.A.
K 10/7 Relation Between Clearance of the Seismic Restraint for Nuclear
Power Piping System and Vibration Characteristics
T. Yoshinaga, N. Gotoh, Hitachi Works, Hitachi Ltd., Ibaraki-ken,
Japan
K 10/9 A Simplified Aseismic Design Procedure for Piping Systems
N. Pal, General Electric Company, ARSD, Sunnyvale, California,
U.S.A.
S. Mizuno, Hitachi Ltd., Hitachi City, Japan
74
Session K 1 1 . Response of Piping and Equipment II

K 11/1 * Structural Damping Values as a Function of Dynamic Response
Stress and Deformation Levels
J.D. Stevenson, J.D. Stevenson Consultants. Cleveland, Ohio,
U.S.A.
K 11/2 Arguments in Favour of Structures, Systems and Equipment
Seismic Qualification by Analysis
R.B. Cambien, J.C. Hennart, Westinghouse Nuclear Europe, Bru
xelles, Belgium
K 11/3 Investigation on the Design Damping Values for Seismic Analy
sis of Nuclear Power Plant Piping Systems
H. Shibata, Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, To
kyo,
T. Ikeda, Tokyo Electric Power Co., Inc., Tokyo,
T. Nakatogawa, Mitsubishi Atomic Power Industries, Inc., Tokyo,
K. Shiraki, Takasago Technical Institute, Mitsubishi Heavy Indu
stries, Ltd., Takasago,Hyogo-ken,
T. Niino, Hitachi Works, Hitachi, Ltd., Ibaraki-ken,
K. Gunyasu, Tokyo Shibaura Electric Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
K 11/4 On Seismically Induced Vibrations of Pressure Vessels with Cu
touts and Cracks
H.T. Tezduyar.T. Ariman, L.H.N. Lee, University of Notre Dame, No
tre Dame, Indiana, U.S.A.
K 11/5 Nonlinear Transient Dynamic Response of Pressure Relief Valves
for a Negative Containment System
T.S. Aziz, Acres, Inc., Toronto, Ontario,
CG. Duff, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Sheridan Park Re
search Community, Mississauga, Ontario,
J.H. Tang, Ontario Hydro, Toronto, Ontario. Canada
K 11/6 Seismic Response Analysis of Nuclear Power Plant Auxiliary Me
chanical Equipment
C.-W. Lin, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, PWR Systems Divi
sion, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
K 11/7 Seismic Interaction Effects for Steam Generators in CANDU 600
MWe Nuclear Power Plants
T.S. Aziz, Acres, Ltd., Toronto, Ontario,
CG. Duff, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Sheridan Park Re
search Community, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
K 11/8 Coupled Lateral-Torsional Response of Equipment Mounted in
CANDU Nuclear Power Plants
M.F. Ishac, Ontario Hydro, Toronto, Ontario,
A.C. Heidebrecht, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
K 11/9 Seismic Analysis of Category I Crane Structures
T.H. Liu, F. Loceff, P.H. Anderson, Westinghouse Electric Corpo
ration, Nuclear Technology Division, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
USA.
K 11/10 Seismic Design of Cableways: A CAD Approach
L. Lazzeri, M. Agrone, P.P. Strona, AMN S.pA., Genova, Italy
K 11/11 Seismic and Accident Analysis of Electrical Machinery
G. Filippi, L. Lazzeri, AMN S.pA., Genova
R. Pagano, E. Vivoda, Ansaldo, Monfalcone, Italy
Session K 12. Reactor Core and Fluid Related Structures

K 12/1 A Three-Dimensional Test Program for the Nonlinear Dynamic Behavior of an HTGR Core
J. Curreri, M. Reich, B. Koplik, P. Bezler, M. Subudhi, Brookhaven
National Laboratory, Upton, New York, U.S.A.
withdrawn
K 12/2 Two-Dimensional Vibration Test and Its Simulation Analysis for a
Horizontal Slice Model of HTGR Core
K. Muto, S. Motohashi, Muto Institute of Structural Mechanics,
Inc., Tokyo,
K. Kuroda, Electric Power Development Co., Tokyo, Japan
K 12/3 Forced Vibration Test of 1/5 Scale Model of CANDU Core
K. Muto, Muto Institute of Structural Mechanics, Inc., Tokyo,
K. Kuroda, Y. Kasai, Electric Power Development Company, Tokyo,
Japan
K 12/4 Seismic Analysis of the Reactor Assembly of a 1000 MWe-LMFBR
Pool Reactor
C.C. Yang, S. Kraus, General Electric Company, Advanced Reactor
Systems Department, Sunnyvale, California, U.S.A.
K 12/5 A Study of Structural Attachments of a Pool Type LMFBR Vessel
Through Seismic Analysis of a Simplified Three Dimensional Finite
Element Model
H.U. Ahmed, D. Ma, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois,
U.S.A.
K 12/6 A Three-Dimensional Computer Code for the Nonlinear Dynamic
Response of an HTGR Core
M. Subudhi, L. Lasker, B. Koplik, J. Curreri, H. Goradia, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, U.S.A.
K 12/7 Evaluation of Seismic Movements of a Pebble Bed Reactor Core as
Basis for Shaking Experiments
H.-J. Glckner, F. Kemter, Hochtemperatur-Reaktorbau GmbH,
Mannheim,
G. Schmidt, Hochtemperatur-Reaktorbau GmbH, Jlich, Fed. Rep.
Germany
K 12/8 Explicit Evaluation of the Apparent Fluid Mass at the Vibration of
Fluid Filled Cylindrical Tanks
D.F. Fischer, VEST-Alpine AG, Linz, Austria
K 12/9 Experimental Seismic Test of Fluid Coupled Co-Axial Cylinders
M. Chu, J.F. Lestingi, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio
S.J. Brown, Babcock Et Wilcox Co., Nuclear Equipment Division,
Barberton, Ohio, U.SA.
K 12/10 Evaluation of Fluid Sloshing Effects in Large Suspended Flexible
Tanks
H.U. Ahmed, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, U.S.A.
76
K 12/11 Dynamic Pressures in Annulus-Shaped Pressure Suppression

Pools of Boiling Water Reactors Generated by Earthquake Ground
Motions
B. Bedrosian.M. Ettouney.J. Brennan, Burns and Roe, Inc., Wood
bury, New York, U.SA.
12/12 Dynamic Analysis of Storage Racks for Spent Fuel Assemblies
G. Habedank, L.M. Habip, H. Swelim, Kraftwerk Union AG, Frank
furt am Main, Fed. Rep. Germany
Session 1 3 . Dynamic Testing and Qualification
1 3 / 1 * Tests and Calculation of the Seismic Behaviour of Concrete
Structures
J. Gauvain, A. Hoffmann, C. Jeandidier, M. Livolant,
CEA.I
CEN-Saclay DEMT, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
13/2
Low Level Earthquake Testing of the HDR: Comparisons of

Calculations and Measurements for the Reactor Building
P. Jehlicka, L. Malcher. Kernforschungszentrum
Karlsruhe, Karls
ruhe,
H. Steinhilber, Battelle-lnstitut e.V., Frankfurt am Main, Fed. Rep.
Germany
13/3 Low Level Earthquake Testing of the HDR: Comparisons of
Calculations and Measurements for Mechanical Equipment
P. Jehlicka, L. Malcher, Kernforschungszentrum
Karlsruhe, Karls
ruhe,
H. Steinhilber, Battelle-lnstitut
e.V., Frankfurt am Main, Fed. Rep.
Germany
13/4
Forced Vibration Test of BWR Type Nuclear Reactor Buildings

Considering Through Soil Coupling between Adjacent Build
ings
N. Mizuno, I. Moribe, N. Sugiyama, Chubu Electric Power Com
pany, Nagoya,
Y.Tsushima, H. Kushida, T. Tamaki, Takenaka Technical Research
Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan
13/5
Seismic Qualification of General Electric Test Reactor Safety-Re

lated Valves
C A . Kircher, J.W. Reed, Engineering Decision Analysis Company,
Palo Alto, California,
D. Hoggatt, General Electric Company, Vallecitos Nuclear Center,
Pleasanton, California, U.S.A.
13/6 Assessment of Seismic Safety for Components of the THTR-300
M We by Shake Tests
G. Neubrech, Hochtemperatur-Reaktorbau
GmbH,
Mannheim,
Fed. Rep. Germany
withdrawn
13/7 Field Vibration Test Results and Design for Reactor Coolant Piping
Systems of ATR ,,FUGEN"
T. Igarashi, K. Arai, Mitsubishi Atomic Power Industries, Inc., Omiya
City,
K. Fujita, Takasago Technical Institute, Mitsubishi Heavy Indu
stries, Inc., Takasago, Hyogo Prefecture, Japan
11
K 13/8 Vibrational Characteristics of Primary Reactor Coolant System

K. Shiraki, K. Fujita, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., Takasago,
K. Kitade, Mitsubishi Atomic Power Industries, Ltd., Tokyo,
T. Kawakatsu, Kansai Electric Power Company, Osaka, Japan
13/9 Experimental and Analytical Studies on Aseismic Design of Ven
tilation Ducts
K. Suzuki, H. Hagiwara, H . Tsuchiya, M. Shimizu, Taisei Corpora
tion, Tokyo, Japan
13/10 The Results of Dynamic Tests on 1:10 Model of Containment for
Nuclear Reactor
K. Donten, M. Knauff, A Sadowski, W. Scibak, Politechnika War
szawska, Warsaw, Poland
13/12 Nonlinear Experimental Response of SemiScale Model of Nuclear
Power Plant Structures to Simulated EarthquakeLike Ground Mo
tion
C. Chan, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California,
C.J. Higgins, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico,
G.E. H oward, P. Ibez, ANCO Engineers, Inc., S anta Monica,
California, U.S A.
78
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Division L. M ATERIALS M ODELING AND INELASTIC
ANALYSIS OF M ETAL STRUCTURES
Session L 1. Advanced Theories I
L 1/1*
Coupling Phenomena in Thermoplasticity

Th. Lehmann, RuhrUniversitt Bochum, 3ochum, Fed. Rep. Ger
many
L 1/3'
Structural Collapse due to Plastic Instability

V. Tvergaard, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Den
mark
A. Needleman, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Is/and,
USA.
Tensor Function Approach to Constitutive Equations of Inelasticity
S. Murakami, Nagoya University, Chikusaku, Nagoya, Japan,
Flow and Fracture of Inelastic Materials Application to Modern
Reactor Technology
P. Perzyna, Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Fundamental
Order, H eat, Intrinsic Dissipation and Inelastic Analysis
J.M. Boisserie, Electricit de France, S ervice Informatique et
Mathmatiques Appliques, Chatou,
P. Guelin, Universit de Grenoble, Grenoble, France
On History Dependence of StressStrain Diagrams and Creep Cur
ves under Variable Repeated Loading
D.A. Gokhfeld, O.S. Sadakov, M.E. Martynenko, Chelyabinsk Poly
technical Institute, Chelyabinsk, U.S .S .R.
L 1/4*
L 1/5
L 1/6
L 11l
Session L 2. Advanced Theories II

L 2/1 *
Reliability of ElasticPlastic Structures

C. Gavarini, Universit di Roma, Roma, Italy
L 2/2* Cyclic Loading on Elastic, Viscoplastic Structures
Z. Mroz, Polish Academy of S ciences, Institute of Fundamental
L 2/3* H ighTemperature Design of ElasticPlastic Structures
D.A. Gokhfeld, Chelyabinsk Polytechnical Institute, Chelyabinsk:
U.S.S.R.
The sign {*) designates Invited Lectures.

A paper number missing in the numeral order means that the paper was cancelled or withdrawn,
79
L 2/4*
L 2/6
Constitutive Modelling in Plasticity

J. Kratochvil, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Solid
State Physics, Prague, .S.S.R.
A Nonlinear Endochronic Theory of Cyclic Plastic Hardening and
Softening
W. Kosinski, T. Nashiro, Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of
Fundamental Technological Research, Warsaw, Poland
Session L 3. Methods I
L3/1*
L 3/2*
L 3/3
L 3/4
L 3/5
L 3/6
Mathematical Programming Methods in Engineering Plasticity

G. Maier, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy,
J. Munro, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London,
U.K.
Inelastic Analysis of Structures with Applications to Cyclic Loadings
J. Zarka, J.J. Engel, G. Inglebert, C.N.R.S., Ecole Polytechnique,
Palaiseau, France
Shakedown Analysis by Displacement Method and Equilibrium Finite Element
H. Nguyen Dang, Universit de Lige, Lige,
L. Palgen, F.N.R.S., Bruxelles, Belgium
Local Bounds on Dissipation Energy in Shakedown Theory
C. Polizzotto.C. Mazzarella, T. Panzeca, Universit di Palermo, Palermo, Italy
Finite Deformation, Elastoplastic Incrementai Finite Element Analysis of Ductile Metal Structures
W.-H. Chen, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Viscous Growth of Thin Pressurized Shells Subjected to Thermal
Cycling
R.O Hibbeler, University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette,
Louisiana, U.SA.
Session L 4. Methods II
L 4/1*
L 4/2
L4/3
80
Elastic-Plastic Analysis Methods for Piping Systems

J.T. Boyle, J. Spence, University ofStrathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland,
U.K.
A Damage Postulate for Nonproportional Cyclic Plasticity
B. Leis, Battelle Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio,
J.H. Laflen, General Electric Company, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.SA.
Improved Boundary-Integral Equation Method for Time-Dependent Inelastic Deformation in Metals
M. Morjaria, S. Mukherjee, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York,
U.S.A.
L 4/5
L 4/6
L4/7
L 4/8
Fundamental Concepts in the Reference Stress Method for Creep

Design
J.T. Boyle, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K.
A Finite Element Formulation for Large Elastic-Plastic Deformations
P.CM. Gortemaker, C. de Pater, Twenfe University of Technology,
Enschede, The Netherlands
Inelastic Analysis of Piping Systems: A Beam-Type Method for
Creep and Plasticity
R.L Roche, A. Hoffmann, A. Millard, CEA./CEN-Saclay DEMT,
Dynamic Plastic Buckling of Shells: a Reconsideration of the
Vaughan-Florence Analysis
G. Horvay, F.D. Stockton, University of Massachusetts, Amherst,
Massachusetts, U.SA.
M.A. Veluswami, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India,
Session L 5. Fracture, Rupture

L 5/1
Predictions of Creep Behavior of Some Stainless Steels on the

Basis of Short-Term Tensile Properties
T. Bui-Quoc, A. Biron, Ecole Polytechnique, Montral, Qubec,
Canada
L 5/1 a* Approximate Methods of Analysis for Creep Rupture
D.A.Hayhurst, University of Leicester, Leicester, U.K.
L5/1b* Damage Modelling for Prediction of Plastic and Creep Fatique
Failure in Structures
J. Lemaitre. Universit P. and M. Curie (Paris VI), Cachan, France
L 5/2
L 5/3
L 5/4
L 5/8
Stress Intensification and Creep Rupture

J. Henderson, F.R. Ferguson, National Engineering Laboratory,
East Kilbride, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K.
Experimental Tests on Ratchet of Tubular Specimens (Torsion and
Tension) - Use for Material Characterization
J. Lebey, R. L. Roche, P. Cousseran, CEA. I CEN-Saclay DEMT,
Gif-sur- Yvette, France.
Strain Analyses of Nonlinear Crack Behavior at Elevated Temperature by Finite Element Method and Moir Topographical Method
T. Aizawa, G. Yagawa, Y. Ando, University of Tokyo, Japan
A Model of Quasi-Static Crack Growth ina Double Cantilever Beam
at Elevated Temperature
LS. Fu, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A.
81
Session L 6. Codes and Criteria

L 6/1*
L 6/3
L 6/4
L 6/5
L 6/6
Development of Inelastic Design Criteria and Codes

W.J. O'Donnell, J.S. Porowski, O'Donnell & Associates, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
High Temperature Design Evaluations by a Creep Ratchetting
Theory
H.U. Ahmed, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, U.S.A.
Requirements on the Mechanical Design of Reactor Systems Operating at Elevated Temperature
H. Schulz, M. Glahn, Gesellschaft fr Reaktorsicherheit, Kln, Fed.
Rep. Germany
Rules for the Analysis of Mechanical Structures at Elevated Temperatures
H. Jakubowicz, CEA./CEN-Saclay DEMT, Gif-sur-Yvette
P. Petrequin, CEA./CEN-Saclay SRMA, Gif-sur-Yvette
K. Schaller, CEA./CEN-Cadarache, DRNR/STRS, Saint-Paul-lezDurance, France
Shakedown Analysis by Finite Element Incremental Procedures
A. Borkowski, M. Kleiber, Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of
Fundamental Technological Research, Warsaw, Poland
Session L 7. Materials Behavior

L 7/1
L 7/2
L7/3
L 7/4
L7/6
L 7/7
82
Thermoviscoplasticity Based on Total Strain and Overstress

E. Krempl, E.P. Cernocky, M.C.M. Liu, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, U.S.A.
Effect of Past Loading on the Current Stress of Rigid Plastic
Materials
Y.S. Lee, G.J. Bhm, S.A. Swamy, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.SA.
Constitutive Equations of Viscoplasticity for Neutron Irradiated
Mild Steel
R.B. Pecherski, Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Warsaw, Poland
Tensile Properties of Zircaloy-4 and 304 Stainless Steel at Constant
True Strain-Rates and Elevated Temperatures
CS. Hartley, D.A. Jenkins, J.-J. Lee, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, U.S.A.
see C 3 / 1 3
Slip Theory of Creep Deformation of Face-Centered-Cubic Polycrystalline Aggregates
S.V. Guerreiro Ribeiro, Comisso Nacional de Energia Nuclear,
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,
T.H. Lin, University of California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
A Continuum Model for a Metal that Recrystallizes During the
Deformation History
A.D. Narayana, D.C. Stouffer, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati,
Ohio, U.S.A.
L 7/8
Low Cycle Fatigue of Steels for Nuclear Pressure Vessels in H ot

Water
C. Gamier, G. Kowalczuk, R. Roche, CEA./CENS aclay DEMT,
Gifsur Yvette,
. Barrachin, IPS N, Paris, France
Session L 8. Applications I
L 8/1
L 8/2
L 8/3
L 8/4
L 8/5
L 8/6
Creep Collapse of a Cylindrical Shell Subjected to External Pres

sure at H igh Temperature
K. Nagato, N. Takikawa, Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd., Tokyo,
Japan
Creep Deflection Analysis of Fuel Channels in CANDU Nuclear Re
actors
M.J. Pettigrew, S.B. Lambert, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited,
Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada
Nonlinear, Dynamic, Plastic ComponentSupport Analysis
W. Elfmann, U. Heeschen, G. Mller, Kraftwerk Union AG, Erlan
gen, Fed. Rep. Germany
Viscoplastic Axisymmetrical Buckling of Spherical Shell Subjected
to Radial Pressure Impulse
W. Wojewdski, P. Lewinski, Politechnica Warszawska, Warsaw,
Poland
Some Design Aspects of Duplex Tubing
J.M. Chern, D.H. Pai, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Living
ston, New Jersey, U.S .A.
Creep Collapse of NonUniform Circular Tubes Subjected to Exter
nal Pressure and NonUniform Temperature
DJ. Lee, J.V. Parker, Nuclear Power Company (Risley) Limited,
Risley, Warrington, Cheshire, U.K.
Session L 9. Applications II
L 9/3
L 9/4
L 9/5
L 9/6
Applications of Endochronic Plasticity in the Dynamic Finite Ele

ment Analysis of Structures
R.A. Valentin, B.J. H sieh, H.C Lin, Argonne National Laboratory,
Argonne, Illinois, U.S .A.
Influence of Weldments in the H igh Temperature Low Cycle Fati
gue Resistance of AISI 304 and 316 Stainless Steel Tubular Ele
ments
C Carmignani, E. Manfredi, E. Vitale, Universit di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
The Development and Validation of Numerical Procedures for the
Prediction of Shipping Cask Puncture
R.A. Larder, D.F. Arthur, J.O. Hallquist, Lawrence Livermore Labo
ratory, Livermore, California, U.S .A.
Plastic Deformation of Steel Shock Absorbing Structures
D. Aquaro, G. Forasassi, Universit di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
83
L 9/8
L 9/9
Analysis and Design of Containment Liner/Anchorage System

T.H. Liu, F. Loceff, W.E. Moore, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.SA.
Inelastic Analysis of Plane Stress Problems
M.M. Ettouney, R.P. Daddazio, J.A. Brennan, J.E. Richardson,
Burns & Roe, Inc., Woodbury, New York, U.S.A.
Session L 10. Simplified Methods

L 10/1* Plastic Design of Complex Shape Structural Elements
W. Szczepinski, Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Warsaw, Poland
L 10/2* Simplified Methods in Inelastic Analysis
RS. Barsoum, Combustion Engineering, Inc., Windsor, Connecticut, U.S.A.
L 10/3 Creep Ratcheting Bounds Based on Elastic Core Concept
J.S. Porowski, W.J. O'Donnell, O'Donnell Associates, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
L 10/4 Creep Behavior of Piping Components under Combined Loading
A. Suzuki, Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co., Tokyo, Japan
L 10/5 Simplified Inelastic Analysis Method of Perforated Plates
K. Uragami, K. Nakamura, K. Asada, Takasago Technical Research
Institute, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., Takasago, Hyogo,
T. Kano, Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
L 10/7 Plastic Frames: Reduction of the Kinematical Inequality and Optimization
P. Brousse, Universit de Paris VI, Paris, France
Session L 1 1 . Damage
L 11/1* Material Damage in Structural Analysis
J. Huit, J. Janson, Chalmers University of Technology, Gteborg,
Sweden
L 11 /3 Modelization of the Strain Memory Effect on the Cyclic Hardening
of 316 Stainless Steel
J.L. Chaboche, Office National d'Etudes et de Recherches Arospatiales, Chtillon,
K. Dang Van, G. Cordier, Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France
L 11/4 Damage Equations for Creep Rupture in Steels
G. Piatti, Commission of the European Communities, J.R.C. Ispra
Establishment, Ispra, Italy,
G. Bernasconi, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy,
F.A. Cozzarelli, Sfafe University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo,
New York, U.S.A.
84
L 11 /5
L 11 /6
L 11/7
L 11/8
L 11/9*
Life Prediction of Simple Structures Subject to Cyclic Primary and

Secondary Loading Resulting in Creep and Plasticity
N.R. Otter, R.T. Jones, GEC Power Engineering Limited, Whetstone, Leicester, U.K.
The Behaviour of Plates Subjected to Steady Mechanical Load and
Rapid Thermal Transients on Both Surfaces
A.M. Goodman, J. Phillips, CEGB, Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories,
Berkeley, Gloucestershire, U.K.
Neutral and Shakedown Domains of Circular Plates Subjected to
Cycles of Pressure and Temperature
Z. Waszczyszyn, E. Pabisek, Technical University of Cracow, Krakow, Poland
Simplified Methods of Inelastic Analysis for Components Operating within the Creep Range
R.A. Ainsworth, I.W. Goodall, CEGB, Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories, Berkeley, Gloucestershire, U.K.
Probabilistic Methods in Plastic Structural Analysis
G. Augusti, Universit degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy
Session L 12. Experiments I

L 12/1
Creep Buckling and Instability of Circular Cylindrical Shells in Axial

Compression
S. Murakami, E. Tanaka, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya,
Japan
L 12/2 Inelastic Buckling Analysis, Experimental Tests on Vessel Heads
M. Alix, R.L. Roche, CEA./CEN-Saclay DEMT, Gif-sur-Yvette,
France
L 12/3 Time Dependence in Biaxial Yield of Type 316 Stainless Steel at
Room Temperature
J.R. Ellis, D.N. Robinson, CE. Pugh, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A.
L 12/4 High Temperature Low Cycle Fatigue Damage Analysis of Welded
Stainless Steel Tubular Elements
A. del Puglia, Universit di Florence, Florence
E. Manfredi, Universit di Pisa, Pisa,
R. Matera, G. Piatti Commission of the European Communities,
J.R.C. Ispra Establishment, Ispra, Italy
L12/5 Yielding of 6061-T6 Aluminum Tubings Under Dynamic Biaxial
Loadings
D.H.Y. Ng, L.H.N. Lee, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, U.S.A.
L12/6 Inelastic Stress-Strain Relationships for the AISI 310 Stainless
Steel in the Temperature Range 20-900C
S. Matteazzi, G. Bernasconi, Politecnico di Milano, Milano,
G. Piatti, Commission of the European Communities, J.R.C. Ispra
Establishment, Ispra, Italy
85
L 12/7
Creep-Fatigue Interaction on 1.4948 Austenitic Stainless Steel, Including Irradiation Effects

R. Schmitt, W. Scheibe, K. Anderko, Kernforschungszentrum
Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Fed. Rep. Germany
L 12/8 Low-Cycle Fatigue Behaviours of 304 Stainless Steel Piping Elbows at Elevated Temperature
K. lida, University of Tokyo, Tokyo,
Y. Ito, Y. Fukuda, Hitachi Research Laboratory. Hitachi Ltd., Hitachi-shi, Ibaragi,
M. Ohsawa, Hitachi Ship Building and Engineering Ltd., Sakai-shi,
Osaka, Japan
L 12/9 Plastic Flow of the Perforated Materials with Square Penetration
Pattern
A. Litewka, E. Rogalska, Technical University of Poznan, Poznan,
Poland
Session L13. Experiments II

L 13/1
L13/3
L13/4
L13/5
L 13/6
L 13/7
L 13/8
86
Effect ot Biaxial Loading and Geometry on Prediction of Low-Cycle

Fatigue Life
A.W.A- Konter, G.T.M. Janssen, T.N.O., Institute for Mechanical
Constructions, Delft,
W. Husslage, T.N.O., Metal Research Institute, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
An Analysis of the Relaxation of Residual Stresses by Using
Vibrational Conditioning
K.K. Wahi, D.E. Maxwell, Science Applications, Inc., San Leandro,
California, U.S.A.
Analysis of Notch Strain for Cyclic Loading
N.E. Dowling, W.K. Wilson, Westinghouse Electric Corporation,
Research and Development Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
U.S.A.
Structural Beam Shapes under Cyclic Inelastic Loads
S.G. Krishnasamy, Ontario Hydro Research Division, Toronto, Ontario,
N.A. Kennedy, A.N. Sherbourne, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
High Temperature Alloys for the Primary Circuit of a Prototype Nuclear Process Heat Plant
P.J. Ennis, H. Schuster, Kernforschungsanlage Jlich, Jlich, Fed.
Rep. Germany
Experimental Analysis on Elasto-Plastic Behaviour of T-Branched
Stainless Steel Pipe
P. Citt, G. Nerli, S. Reale, P. Rissone, Universit di Florence,
Florence,
G. Tomassetti, CNEN Casaccia, Roma, Italy
The Response of Flat Plates Subjected to a Centrally Distributed
Heat Flux
D.L. Wesenberg, P.H. Adams, CM. Stone, Sandia Laboratories,
Albuquerque, New Mexico, U.SA.
L 13/9
Creep and Relaxation Behaviours of 304 Stainless Steel Piping

Elbows
K. lida, University of Tokyo, Tokyo,
Y. Ito, Y. Fukuda, Hitachi Research Laboratory, Hitachi Ltd, Hitachi-shi, Ibaragi,
M. Ohsawa, Hitachi Ship Building and Engineering Ltd., Sakai-shi,
Osaka, Japan
L 13/10 Structural Behavior of Welded Superalloy Cylinder with Internal
Pressure in High Temperature Environment
T. Udoguchi, Chiba University, Chiba,
Y. Asada, University of Tokyo, Tokyo,
T. Nakanishi, Fuji Electric Co., Ltd., Yokosuka, Japan
87
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Division M. METHODS FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
Session M 1. Integrated Methods of Structural Analysis
M 1/1* Integrated Computer-Based Systems: Survey and Outlook
J.F. Gloudeman, The MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
M 1/2 Finite Element Three-Dimensional Elastic-Plastic Creep Analysis
A. Levy, Grumman Aerospace Corporation, Bethpage, New York,
U.S.A.
M 1/3 PAM-NL: A General Finite Element Program for the Nonlinear
Thermomechanical Analysis of Structures
E. Haug, J.M. Locci, Engineering System International, RungisSilic,
FC. Arnaudeau, Novatome Industries, Le Plessis Robinson, France
M 1/4 Further Developments of Capabilities in the Program ANSR for
Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis
DP. Mondkar, G.H. Powell, University of California, Berkeley, California, U.S.A.
M 1/5 The Computer Program System for Structural Design of Nuclear
Power Plant
S. Aihara, K. Atsumi, K. Sasagawa, S. Satoh, Kajima Corporation,
Architectural Design Division, Tokyo, Japan
M 1/6 Engineering Capabilities of the ASASIN Program
N.O Knowles, V.M. Trbojevic, Atkins Research and Development,
Epsom, Surrey,
J.R. Stoker, Engineering Technology Associates, Stokingford, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, U.K.
M 1/7* Algorithmic and Other Aspects of Large Scale Lagrangian Computation by Finite Element and Finite Difference Techniques
GL. Goudreau, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, California, U.S.A.
Session M 2. Numerical Implementation of Inelastic Material
Models
M 2/1* On Constitutive Modelling in Finite Element Analysis
K.J. Bathe, M.D. Snyder, M.P. Cleary, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
M 2/2* Computational Aspects of Inelastic Analysis
J.H. Argyris, LE. Vaz, K.J. Willam, ISD, Universitt Stuttgart,
Stuttgart, Fed. Rep. Germany
The sign () designates Invited Lectures.
88
M 2/3
M 2/4
M 2/5
M 2/6
M 2/7
M 2/8
A Finite Element Model for Plane Strain Plasticity with Velocity Discontinuities
H.M. van Rij, The Netherlands Energy Research Foundation, Petten, The Netherlands
Computer Implementation of an Elastic-Plastic Concrete Relationship
D.W. Murray, L. Chitnuyanondh, C Wong, University of Alberta,
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Coupled Damage Modes (CDM) Plasticity Models for the Simulation of Complex Materials Used in Reactors
J.J. Dubois, J.O Bianchini, A. de Rouvray, Engineering System International, Rungis-Silic, France
Implementation of Endochronic Theory for Concrete with Extension to Include Cracking
G.H. Powell, University of California, Berkeley, California, U.S.A.,
IP. de Villiers, Bruinette, Kruger & Stoffberg, Capetown, Republic
of South Africa,
R.W. Litton, PMB Systems Engineering, Inc., San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
Three Dimensional Finite Element Linear Analysis of Reinforced
Concrete Structures
M. Inbasakaran, V.G. Pandahnathan, CS. Krishnamoorthy, Coimbatore Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, India
Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of RC Structures Subjected to
Thermal Load
TP. Khatua, A. Al-Dabbagh, Sargent & Lundy Engineers, Chicago,
Illinois, U.S.A.
Session M 3. Design and Simplified Methods of Analysis

M 3/1
M 3/2
M 3/3
M 3/4
M 3/5
M 3/6
Optimal Shapes of Pressure Vessel Heads to Minimize Shearing

Stress
J. Middleton, University of Wales, Swansea, UK.
Plastic Analysis of the Core Barrel Flange Deformations According
to Non-Symmetric Bending Loadings
U. Berkner, Kraftwerk Union AG, Erlangen, Fed. Rep. Germany
see F 1/4
Thermal Shocks in Solar Boiler Tubes and Mechanical Tolerance
to Heating Velocity
C Gamby, P. Pietri, Universit de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
Membrane versus Shell Type Elements in Finite Element Analysis
of Box Type Buildings
G. Canetta, Finzi-Nova-Castellani Associated Engineers, Milano,
Italy
Methods of Two-Steps Inelastic Analysis of Liners
E. Vitiello, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
Super Element Model Development and Analysis of the Mark I Torus Structure
L.-C Hua, Bechtel Power Corporation, San Francisco, California,
U.S.A.
89
M 3/7
Study of an Axisymmetric Model for the Parametric Analysis of a

3D Complex Steel Structure
A. Morel, E. Rodet, NERSA, Lyon,
F. Besnier, G. Rozenblum, Compagnie Internationale de Services
en Informatique, Paris, France
M 3/8 Comparison Between a 3D Photoelastic Model and an Axisymmetric Finite Element Calculus
A. Morel, NERSA-EDF, Lyon,
A. Zolzettich, NERSA-ENEL, Lyon,
F. Jullien, INSA, Villeurbanne,
E. Somma, D. Amir-Mazaheri, Socit d'Etudes et d'Equipement
d'Entreprises, Paris, France
M 3/9 Safety Investigation of a Spent Fuel Pool for Installation of
High Capacity Fuel Racks
T.H. Chen, W. Sawi;uk, R. Chang, Gilbert Associates, Inc., Reading, Pennsylvania, U.SA.
M 3/10 A Mechanistic Assessment of Structural Failure for Missile Impacts
on Concrete Structures
P. Godbout, A. Brais, Universit de Montral, Montral, Qubec,
Canada
Session M 4. Computational Techniques for Plate and Shell

Analysis I
M 4/1* Finite Elements for Large Displacement General Shell Analyses
R.L. Taylor, University of California, Berkeley, California, U.S.A.
M 4/2 Analysis of Shell Components by Finite Elements
R. Pratt, P. Ward, Atkins Research and Development, Epsom, Surrey, U.K.
M 4/3 FAST - A Shell Code Using Asymptotic Results
CR. Steele, Stanford University, Stanford, California,
G.V. Ranjan. Failure Analysis Associates, Palo Alto, California,
C Goto, Shell Technology Associates, Palo Alto, California,
T.H. Pulliam, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, U.S.A.
M 4/4 Matrix Analysis of the Asymmetrical Bending of Conical ShellBeams and Their Singular Assemblies
A. Kiedrzynski, L. Coppens, Universit Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
M 4/5 A Finite Element Model for Nonlinear Shells of Revolution
W.A. Cook, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos, New
Mexico, U.S.A.
M 4/6 Large Deflection Elastic-Plastic Analysis of Shells of Revolution
with a Quasilinearization Algorithm
H.U. Ahmed, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois,
U.S.A.
90
M 4/7
M 4/8
Elasto/Visco-Plastic Deformations of Thin Shells of Revolution

S. Takezono, T. Akashi, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
Elasto/Visco-Plastic Analysis of Axisymmetrical Shells under
Asymmetrical Loading
K. Tao, S. Takezono, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
Session M 5. Computational Techniques for Plate and Shell

Analysis II
M 5/1
Analysis of the Buckling Behaviour of Structures

M. Knig, ISD, Universitt Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Fed. Rep. Germany
M 5/2
A Note on Imperfection Sensitivity of Externally Pressurized Shells

R.L. Citerley, E.B. Paxson, Jr., Anamet Laboratories, Inc., San
Carlos, California,
RE. Ball, U.S. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California,
U.S.A.
Experience with a New Triangular Doubly-Curved Element for
Shell Analysis
S.-C Wu, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York,
J.F. Abel, McDonnell Doug/as Automation, St.-Louis, Missouri,
USA.
M 5/3
M 5/4
M 5/5
M 5/6
M 5/7
M 5/9
The Use of the Semiloof Shell Element in the BERSAFE Finite Element System
T.K. Hellen, CEGB, Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories, Berkeley, Gloucestershire, U.K.
A New Finite Element for Structural Analysis of Piping Systems
H. Takeda, S. Asai, Century Research Center Corporation, Tokyo,
K. Iwata, Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
Non-Linear Analysis of Shells (Large Displacements); Use of the
Equilibrium Equations Based on the Deformed Body
A Combescure, A. Hoffmann, CEA./CEN-Saclay DEMT ISMTS,
Incorporation of an Eigenvalue Dynamic Buckling Criteria into Direct Integration Procedures
V. Svalbonas, Koppers Company, Inc., York, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
A Thin Shell Dynamic Transient Non-Linear Analysis Program
Y. Crutzen, Commission of the European Communities, J.R.C.
91
Session M 6. Computational Techniques within Finite Element

Analysis I
M 6/1 * Penalty Methods in Finite Element Analysis of Fluids and Structures
D.S. Malkus, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois,
U.S.A.
M 6/2 A Boundary Method to Solve Mixed Boundary Value Problems by
Consistent Weighting to the Different Boundary Conditions
K. Brandes, Bundesanstalt fr Materialprfung, Berlin (West), Germany
M 6/3 Contact Finite Elements
U. Schomburg, J. Redmer, G. Deeken, Rheinisch-Westflische
Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Fed. Rep. Germany
M 6/4 EPAS-Finite Element Program for Analysis of Nonlinear Behavior
of Nuclear Power Piping
G. Yagawa, Y. Ando, University of Tokyo, Tokyo,
T. Watanabe, S. Ishiwata, Century Research Corporation, Tokyo.
Japan
M 6/5 A Procedure to Obtain Unconditionally Stable Explicit Methods for
Structural Problems
L. Brusa, R. Ciacci, A. Greco, CISE, Milano, Italy
M 6/6 Dynamic Analysis of Buried Structures Subjected to Shock Loads
T.P. Khatua, A.K. Pattanayak, Sargenta Lundy Engineers, Chicago,
Illinois,
A.K. Gupta, Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
M 6/7 A Numerical Method for Complex Structural Dynamics in Nuclear
Plant Facilities
W. Zeitner, Kraftwerk Union AG, Erlangen, Fed. Rep. Germany
M 6/8 Implicit Treatment of the Large Deformation Response of
Inelastic Solids with Slide-Lines
J.O. Hallquist, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, California, U.S.A.
Session M 7. Computational Methods within Finite Element

Analysis II
M 7/1* Quasi-Newton Iteration in Non-Linear Structural Dynamics
M. Geradin, M. Hogge, Universit de Lige, Lige, Belgium
M 7/2 Efficient Solution Procedures of Simultaneous Equations for Large
Nonlinear Finite Element Systems
M. Tanabe, H. Takeda, Century Research Center Corporation, Tokyo,
K. Iwata, Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
92
M 7/3
M 7/4
M 7/5
M 7/6
M 7/7
M 7/8
Linear Dynamic Analysis by Hybrid Displacement Finite Element

Models
K. Brandt, Brown, Boveri & Cie AG, Mannheim
J.W. Wissmann, Technische Hochschule Darmstadt, Darmstadt,
Fed. Rep. Germany
A Method of Solution of the Eigenproblems of Large Structural Systems in an Arbitrarily Specified Range
J. Orkisz, B. Wrana, University of Cracow, Cracow, Poland
Solutions of Associated Problems in Structural Optimization
P. Brousse, Universit de Paris VI, Paris, France
Modal Analysis and Estimation of the Calculation Errors
W. Krings, Bauunternehmung E. Heitkampf GmbH, Herne, Fed.
Rep. Germany
Adaptive versus Standard Finite Element Programs: Data for
Comparison of Costs and Accuracy
A. Peano, ISMES, Bergamo, Italy,
P. Basu, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.
Remesh Algorithms for the Finite Element and Finite Difference
Calculation of Solid and Fluid Continuum Mechanics Problems
J. Dubois, J.F. Chedmail, Engineering System International, Rungis-Silic,
C. Chavant, CISI Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette,
A. Hoffmann, CEA.ICEN Saclay DEMT, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Session M 8. Probabilistic Methods in Structural Analysis

M 8/1 * Some Aspects of the Interaction Between Systems- and Structural
Reliability
G.I. Schuller, Technische Universitt Mnchen, Mnchen,
P. Kafka. Gesellschaft fr Reaktorsicherheit, Garching,
W. Schmitt, Kraftwerk Union AG, Erlangen, Fed. Rep. Germany
M 8/3 The Development of Time-History Design Criteria for Uncertain
Transient Loads
JR. Benjamin, Engineering Decision Analysis Company, Inc., Palo
Alto, California, U.S.A.
M 8/5 COVASTOL: A Computer Code for the Estimation of Pressure
Vessel Failure Probability
A C Lucia, J. Eibaz R. Brunnhuber, Commission of the European
Communities, J.R.C. Ispra Establishment, Ispra, Italy
M 8/6 Methods to Determine the Influence of Quality Assurance on the
Reliability of Primary Components of a PWR
W. Schmitt, R. Wellein, Kraftwerk Union AG, Erlangen, Fed. Rep.
Germany
M 8/7 Effects of Correlation between Defects and Material Properties on
Component Failure Probability
D.L. Marriott, A.R. Churchill, Atomic Energy Board. Licensing
Branch, Pelindaba, Republic of South Africa
93
M 8/8
Reliability of Mechanical Components Subjected to Combined Alternating and Mean Stresses with a Nonconstant Stress Ratio
D. Kececioglu, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A.,
G.B. Lamarre, Canadian Forces Command and Staff College,
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
M 8/9
Design Stresses in Probabilistic Form for Ellipsoidal and Toroidal

Pressure Vessels
CO. Smith, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, Nebraska,
U.S.A.
Session M 9. Numerical Procedures for Fracture Mechanics

M 9/1
M 9/2
M 9/3
M 9/4
M 9/5
M 9/6
M 9/7
M 9/8
M 9/9
A Numerical Comparison of Post Yield Fracture Behaviour in Rotor

Steels
T.K. Hellen, CEGB, Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories, Berkeley, Gloucestershire, U.K.
withdrawn
Improved Practical Lower Bound for Fracture Toughness Data
G.M. Jouris, D.H. Shaffer, Westinghouse Research and Development Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Defect Vectors and Path Integrals in Fracture Mechanics
R.L. Roche, CEA./CEN-Saclay DEMT, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
On the J-lntegral for Nonhomogeneous Cracked Composites
W.-H. Chen, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Fracture Mechanics Evaluation of Reactor Vessel Using Stress Intensity Factors from Enriched Finite Elements
D.T. Ramani, F.L. Cho, R.D. Raheja, Sargent & Lundy Engineers,
Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
An Investigation of Degenerate Isoparametric Finite Elements
for Stress Intensity Computations
H.U. Akay, O. Grdogan, Middle East Technical University, Ankara,
Turkey
A New Mixed Mode Fracture Mechanics Criterion
P. Laf ore, CEA./CEN-Saclay DEMT, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Handy Incorporation of Bond and Singularity Elements in the
Finite Element Solution Routine
Y. Yamada, Y. Ezawa, I. Nishiguchi, Institute of Industrial Science,
University of Tokyo, Tokyo,
M. Okabe, Mitsui Mining and Smelting Company, Ltd., Tokyo,
Japan
The Analysis of Structures Containing Defects Using Isoparametric
Elements
B.V. Day P. Brierley, Nuclear Power Company (Risley) Ltd., Risley,
Warrington, Cheshire, U.K.
Session M 10. Dynamic Modelling in Seismic Analysis

M 10/1 Application of Far Field Asymptotic Solutions in Global-Local Finite Elements
R. Muki, SB. Dong, University of California, Los Angeles, U.S.A.
M 10/2 An Interior Collocation Method for Vibration of a Rectangular
Plate Carrying Attached Mass
Y. A. Patel, Sargent & Lundy Engineers, Chicago. Illinois, U.S.A.
M 10/3 The Use of an Equivalent Homogeneous Half-Space in Soil-Structure Interaction Analyses
U. Holzlhner, Bundesanstalt fr Materialprfung, Berlin (West),
Germany
M 10/3a Some Considerations on the Dynamic Structure-Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis
W. Matthees, Bundesanstalt fr Materialprfung, Berlin (West),
Germany
M 10/4 Quasi-Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis
C. Meyer, Columbia University, New York, N. Y., U.SA.
M 10/5 Approximations for Dynamic Modeling
ST. Wu, K.D. Chi, E. Odar, Ebasco Services, Inc., New York,
N.Y., USA.
M 10/6 Stochastic Finite Element Structural Models
H. Contreras, R.E. Scholl, URS/John A. Blume & Associates, Engineers, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
M 10/7 Nonlinear Response to the Multiple Sine Wave Excitation of a Softening-Hardening System
B. Koplik, M. Subudhi, J. Curreri, Brookhaven National Laboratory,
Upton, New York, U.S.A.
Session M 1 1 . Advances in Linear Boundary and Initial Value

Problems
M 11 /1 Solution of Plane Stress and Plate Bending Problems by Boundary
Integral Equations
R.L. Grover, Defense Products Division, Brunswick Corporation,
Lincoln, Nebraska,
S.I. Chou, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S.A.
M 11/2 Applications of the Fundamental Solution for a Thermal Shock on
a Finite Orthotropic Cylindrical Thin Shell
C.L.D. Huang, P.G. Kirmser, Kansas State University, Manhattan,
Kansas,
H.K. Woo, General Atomic Company, San Diego, California,
USA.
M 11/3 Thermal Stresses in Cylindrical Shells Under Arbitrary Temperature Distribution
W. Schnell, Technische Hochschule Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Fed.
Rep. Germany
95
M 11/4 Transient Thermal Stresses in a Transversely Isotropic Thick Plate

with a Cylindrical Hole due to Surface Heat-Generations
Y. Sugano, Y. Takeuti, University of Osaka Prefecture, Sakai,
Osaka, Japan
M 11/6 Elastic Behavior of Thick Plates and Shells with Cutouts
CP. Vendhan, J.P. Cash, W.A. Nash, University of Massachusetts,
Amherst, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
M 11/7 The Application of the Energy Principle to 3-Dimensional Shell
Problems
W.W. Feng, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, California, U.S.A.
withdrawn
96
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Division N. THERMAL, MATERIALS ENGINEERING, AND
STRUCTURAL MECHANICS PROBLEMS OF
FUTURE FUSION REACTOR POWER PLANTS
Session N 1.1. Engineering Concepts of Magnetic
Confinement Fusion Reactor Systems
N 1.1/1'Magnetic Confinement Fusion Reactor Systems
R. Aymar, CEA. Dpartement de Physique du Plasma et de la
Fusion Contrle, Centre d'Etudes Nuclaires, Fontenay-auxRoses, France
N1.1/2*The USA/TNS Programs: Engineering Considerations
T.E. Shannon, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee,
J.M. Rawls, General Atomic Company, San Diego, California,
USA.
N 1.1/3* Mirror Fusion Reactor Design
W.S. Neef, Jr., G.A. Carlson, R.W. Moir, Lawrence Livermore
Laboratory, Livermore, California, U.SA.
N 1.1/5 Structural Engineering Problems in FINTOR Conceptual Designs
M. Biggio, G. Casini, F. Farfaletti-Casali, M. Rieger, J. van Renterghem, Commission of the European Communities, J.R.C. Ispra
Establishment, Ispra,
G. Rubinacci, Universit di Napoli, Napolijtaly
Session N 1.2. Engineering Concepts of Inertial Confinement
and Hybrid Fusion Reactor Systems and Safety
Considerations
N 1.2/1* Inertial Confinement of Fusion Reactors
R.W. Conn, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.
N 1.2/2 Electric Power from Laser Fusion: The HYLIFE Concept
M.J. Monsler, J.A. Blink, J. Hovingh, W.R. Meier, P. Walter, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, California, U.S.A.
N 1.2/3* Structural Concerns in Fusion Hybrid Reactors
K.R. Schultz, General Atomic Company, San Diego, California,
U.S.A.
N 1.2/4 Engineering Design of the SOLASE-H Laser Fusion Hybrid Reactor
S.I. Abdel-Khalik, R.W. Conn, G.A. Moses, et al., University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.
N 1.2/5* Fusion Reactor Safety
D. Okrent, W.E. Kastenberg, University of California, Los Angeles,
California, U.S.A.
Notes:
T h e sign ("I designates Invited Lectures.

A title m e n t i o n e d on the Table of C o n t e n t s but not f o l l o w e d by a s u m m a r y or a paper means t*iat the paper
w a s not available at t h e t i m e of finishing of t h e book.
A paper n u m b e r missing m t h e n u m e r a l order means that the paper w a s cancelled or w i t h d r a w n
97
Session N 1.3. Thermal-Fluid Dynamics of Fusion Power

Reactor Systems
N 1.3/1'ThermalHydraulic Considerations in Magnetically Confined Fu
sion Reactors
D.W. Kearney, Solar Energy Research Institute, Golden, Colorado,
U.SA.
N 1.3/2 ThermoFluid Mechanics of Liquid or Gas Cooled Tubular First
Walls
J.A. Filio, J.R. Powell, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
New York, U.S .A.
N 1.3/3 Thermal Analysis of a H ighTemperature Falling Bed Fusion
Reactor Blanket
J.F. de Paz, S.D. Harkness, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne,
Illinois, U.S A.
N 1.3/4* Heat Transfer in Inertial Confinement Fusion Reactor Systems
J. Hovingh, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, California,
U.SA.
N 1.3/5 H ydrodynamic Effects in Inertial Fusion Reactors
S.L.Thomson, Bechtel National, S an Francisco, California, U.S.A.
N 1.3/6 Shock and Blast Load Attenuation in Inertial Confinement Fusion
Reactors
CA. Kot, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, U.S .A.
N 1.3/8 Cooldown and Warmup Thermal Analysis of the Mirror Fusion Test
Facility (MFTF) Superconducting Magnet
R.F. O'Neill, R.E. Tatro, General Dynamics Convair, San Diego,
California, US A.
Session N 2.1. Structural Analysis of M agnets

2 . 1 / Existing and Future Structural Analysis Techniques and Their App
lication to Superconducting Magnets
M. Reich, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York,
U.SA.
N 2.1/4 Finite Element Structural Analysis of Coil and Casing of a Large
Superconducting Toroidal LCTMagnet
J. Erb, Universitt Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe,
A. Grnhagen, G. Messemer, H . Zehlein, Kernforschungszentrum
Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Fed. Rep. Germany
N 2.1/5 On the Mechanical Anisotropy in Superconducting Toroidal Coil
Windings
F. Arendt, C. Dustmann, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe,
N 2.1/6 Method for Determining the Magnet Shape in Toroidal Arrange
ments
J. Erb, W. Maurer, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe,
Fed. Rep. Germany
98
N 2.1/7 Structural Analysis of Non-Circular Coils for Fusion Experiments

K.E. Buck, J.W. Hammel, Brown, Boveri & Cie., Mannheim, Fed.
Rep. Germany
N 2.1/8 Structural Analysis of Compact Experiments for Thermonuclear
Ignition
B. Coppi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,
Massachusetts, U.S.A.,
A. Taroni, Centro Calcolo, CNEN, Bologna, Italy
N 2.1/9 Fields Analysis of TFR 604 Copper Coils
P. Bourrier, C. Dubois, SOCOTEC, Paris,
P. Deschamps, CEA./CEN-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette,
A. Millard, CEA. ICEN, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
Session N 2.2. Magnet Technology

N 2.2/1'Structural Materials for Fusion Magnets
CD. Henning, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, California,
E.N.C. Dalder, United States Department of Energy, Washington,
D.C, U.S.A.
N 2.2/2 General Dynamics Convair Division Approach to Structural Analysis of Large Superconducting Coils
R.W. Baldi, General Dynamics Convair Division, San Diego, California, U.S.A.
N 2.2/3 Applications of Metallic Composites in the Magnet System of a
Demonstration Fusion Reactor
R. Matera, Commission of the European Communities, J.R.C.-Ispra
Establishment, Ispra, Italy,
R. Potts, D.H. Prothero, International Research and Development
Co., Ltd., Newcastle, U.K.,
G. Pasotti, M.V. Ricci. N. Sacchetti, M. Spadoni, CNEN, Laboratorio
Gas lonizatti, Frascati, Italy
N 2.2/4 The Structural Design of Superconducting Magnets for the Large
Coil Program
W.H. Gray, W.C.T. Stoddart, C.J. Long, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.SA.
N 2.2/5 Structural Design of DEALS Magnet
P. Bezler, S.Y. Hsieh, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New
York,
T. Balderes,T. Brown, J. Bundy, Grumman Aerospace Corporation,
Bethpage, New York, U.S.A.
99
Session N 2.3. First Wall Performance in Fusion Reactors

N 2.3/1 * A Review of Lifetime Analyses for the First Wall of a Tokamak-Based Reactor
S.D. Harkness, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois,
J. Davis, McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co., St. Louis, Missouri,
U.S.A.
N 2.3/2 FWLTB - A Computer Program for Predicting the Lifetime of a Fusion Reactor First Wall
W. Daenner, J. Raeder, Max-Planck-Institut fr Plasmaphysik, Association EURATOM-IPP, Garching, Fed. Rep. Germany
N 2.3/3 Approaches to Assessing the Failure Resistance of Fusion Reactor
First Walls
G.R. Odette, University of California, Santa Barbara, California,
T.O Reuther, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington,D.C,
W.G.Wolter, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.
N 2.3/5 Stress Wave Edge Effects in ICTR Structural Components
M.S. Hejazi, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois,
E.G. Lovell, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.
N 2.3/6 Loads and Stresses in ICF Reactors
withdrawn
IO. Bohachevsky, L.A. Booth, T.G. Frank, J.H. Pendergrass, Los
Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, U.S.A.
N 2.3/7 Thermal, Radiation and Structural Mechanics Problems of Magnetic-Confinement CTR First Wall
B.M. Ma, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, U.S.A.
Session N 2.4. Fusion Blanket Structural Analysis

N 2.4/1* First Wall and Blanket Structure Performance
W. Daenner, Max-Planck-Institut fr Plasmaphysik, Association
Euratom-IPP, Garching, Fed. Rep. Germany
N 2.4/2 Fracture Mechanics Aspects of Irradiated Blanket Structures
B.A. Cramer, J.W. Davis, McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Company, St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.
N 2.4/3 Dynamic and Static Structural Analysis of Liquid Lithium Blanket
of Fusion Power Plant
M. Masuda, T. Horie, G. Yagawa, Y. Ando, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
N 2.4/4 Stress Analysis of Blanket Vessel for JAERI Experimental Fusion
Reactor
K. Sako, A. Minato, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Tokai
Research Establishment, Ibaraki-ken, Japan
N 2.4/5 The Structural Design Techniques Used in the Mirror Fusion Test
Facility (MFTF) Vacuum Vessel
L.W. Pollard, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, California, U.S.A.
withdrawn
100
N 2.4/6 Mechanical Studies for Supraconducting Toroidal Field Coils of

Large Tokamak Fusion Device
R. Aymar, Y. Roux, CE.A./CEN-FAR (DPh-SCP), Fontenay-auxRoses,
P. Bourrier, C Dubois, SOCOTEC, Paris,
A. Millard, CEA./CEN-Saclay, DEMT, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
N 2.4/7 Mechanical Static Analysis of the JET Vacuum Vessel
B. Streibl, JET Project Abingdon, Oxon, U.K.,
P. Bourrier, Th. Foult, SOCOTEC, Paris, France
N 2.4/8 Structural Design Methods for Ceramics in Fusion Reactors
G.G. Trantina, J.P.D. Wilkinson, General Electric Corporate Research Et Development, Schenectady, New York, U.SA.
N 2.4/9 Engineering Design of a Direct-Cycle Steam-Generating Blanket
for a Long-Pulse Fusion Reactor
CE. Cort, R.L. Hagenson, R.W. Teasdale, W.E. Fox, P.D. Soran,
CG. Bathke.H.S.Cullingford, R.A. Krakowski, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, U.S.A.
Session N 2.5. Materials and Plasma-Fluid Wall Interaction

N 2.5/1 "The Change of Materials Properties During Irradiation in Fusion
Reactor Service
F.W. Wiffen, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A.
N 2.5/2 Radiation Effects on Elasticity of Metals
M. Afzali, Arya-Mehr University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran,
S. Nemat-Nasser, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois,
U.S.A.
N 2.5/3 Corrosion of Structural Materials in Dynamic Lithium
F. Casteels, H. Tas, J. DeKeyser, M. Soenen, F. Lievens, Studiecentrum voor Kernenergie, S.CK./CE.N., Mol, Belgium
N 2.5/4 The Response of Stainless Steel to the Pellet Debris in a Laser
Fusion Reactor
T.J. McCarville, A.M. Hassanein, G.L. Kulcinski, University of
Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, U.SA.
N 2.5/5 Dynamic Loading of the Structural Wall in a Lithium Fall Fusion
Reactor
L.A.Glenn, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, California,
U.S.A.
N 2.5/7 Structural Alloys for Superconducting Magnets in Fusion Energy
Systems
H.I. McHenry, R.P. Reed, National Bureau of Standards, Boulder,
Colorado, U.S.A.
101
AUTHORS INDEX
AbdeL-KhaUk
Abe
S.I.
H.
Abel
J.F.
1.2/4
4/9,
5/3
Adams
N.J.I.
2/5,
Adams
P.H.
13/8
Afzali
M.
2.5/2
1/6
Agrawal
P.K.
Agrone
M.
11/10
Agero
A.A.
5/7
Ahmed
H.U.
4/6,
Ahmed
K.M.
6/7
Aihara
S.
Ainsworth
Aird
R.A.
8/5,
11/8
3/4
H.M.
Aizawa
T.
5/4
Akashi
T.
4/7
Akay
H.U.
9/6
Akkas
N.
4/5
Akky
M.R.
Albertini
Albeson
C.
K.
Albrecht
W.
Al-Dabbagh
Alderson
Alix
.
...G.
M.
Alujevic
A.
AmiiMazahen'
H.D.
A-Moneim
M.T.
Amzallag
C.
Anand
A.K.
Anantharaman
Anderko
K.
K.
Andersen
A.
Andersen
S.I.
Anderson
P. II.
Anderson
R.G.
Ando
W.R.
Antony-Spies
Aoyagi
Y.
Aquaro
D.
Arai
K.
Arendt
F.
Argon
A.5.
Argyris
J.H.
1/3
3/1*
8/5
7/1
2/8
2/4
12/2
3/4
3/8
3/3,
8/2
3/10,
3/11
12/7
6/6,
4/4
G 3/1*
8/6,
1/5
3/4
K 12/5,
K 12/10,
L 6/3,
3/11
6/8
2/8,
4/1*,
G 10/1*
Y.
Andrews
P.
11/9
5/10
4/7,
5/2
7/3
4/9,
9/6
13/7
2.1/5
3/5
2/2*
L 5/4,
J 4/4,
H 6/4,
J 4/5,
2.4/3
J 4/6,
105
4/7
4/6
Ariman
T.
D 7/4,
Arnaudeau
F.C.
Arnold
L.
E 4/1*
Arnold
P.
Arockiasamy
Arros
Asada
Asai
5/3
8/5
L
9/5
K.
10/5
Y.
13/10
S.
Aschl
F 3/7,
H.
H 1/4
J.E.
E 6/2
Asmis
G.J.K.
M 5/5
J 3/2,
K 2/8
Assedo
R.
F 2/1,
F 2/2
Atalik
T.S.
K 9/3
Atchison
R.J.
J 3/2,
At l u r i
S.N.
G 4/3
Atsumi
K.
M 1/5
Augusti
G.
Aurich
D.
Axisa
K 2/8
11/9*
G 2/3
F.
E 6/7
Avet-Flancard
R.
J 7/1*
Aymar
R.
N 1.1/1*,
Ayres
D.
F 5/1*
T.S.
K 11/5,
Aziz
Balderes
Baldi
Ball
T.
A.K.
S.
Barai
N 2.2/5
E 5/6
Bantle
K 4/5
J 6/6,
L.
B.
Barsoum
R.S.
Bastien
R.
L 10/2*
H 5/6
P.
M 7/7
Basu
S.
C 3/10,
Bates
J.F.
C 3/9
Bathe
K.J.
M 2/1*
C.G.
Bauer
J.
Baum
M.R.
106
6/8
L 7/8
Basu
Baylac
F 8/4
Barrachin
Bathke
K 11/7
M 5/2
R.E.
Banerjee
N 2.4/6
N 2.2/2
R.W.
Baltes
K 11/4
K 4/7
D.F.
Asada
Ash
M.
J.
Arthur
E 3/5,
M 1/3
G.
N 2.4/9
J 9/3
f
6/5
F 2/1
C 3/11
Bazant
..
Bazergui
Beck
8/1*,
A.
R.L.
Becker
J 2/9
E.B.
Bedrosian
B.
Beeston
5/4
J 2/7,
J.M.
F 1/1
J.
G 4/5
Beine .
Belytschko
T.B.
Benamou
B 1/4,
J.R.
Benuzzi
A.
Berger
U.
Bernard
A.
5/2
D 5/7
G.
L 11/4,
Bernreuter
O.L.
K 3/3,
Berriaud
C.
A.
F 2/4
Besnier
F.
Bethmont
M.
L.
P.
F 7/5
F 4/5,
Bhardwaj
S.A.
S.B.
Bianchini
J.C.
M.
D 3/7,
D 5/6
J 9/4,
M 2/5
1.1/5
G 1/2,
M.
L
S.
5/1
0 3/7,
D 5/6
H 5/5,
H 5/6
Black
W.E.
Blair
W.
H 8/5
Blink
J.A.
R.
Bohachevsky
Bongartz
Booker
Booker
1.2/2
H 8/5
1.0.
G.J.
N 2.3/6
K 8/7,
Boisserie
J.M.
K.
C 2/2,
F 5/12
M.K.
L.A.
Bordet
R.
L 7/2
1/6
B.L.P.
Booth
G 6/3
C 1/8
A.
Blundell
N 2.2/5
D 4/6
Singh
Bohm
K 12/1,
H 5/5
Bevilacqua
Bir
K 8/3,
3/7
F 5/10
W.S.
Billaux
K 3/5
J 5/6
C.
Biggio
L 12/6
K 3/4,
J 7/1*
Bertaut
Biron
H 8/1*,
F 1/4
Bernasconi
B i lek
E 6/3*,
M 8/3
Berkner
Bhoje
E 3/3,
E 4/1*
Bezler
E 2/2,
J 3/8
Benjamin
Betts
12/11
7/1
Beinert
Berro
J 4/9
F 8/3
C 2/3
F 5/12
N 2.3/6
J
1/6
107
H 8/2
Bork
J 9/7,
M.
Borkowski
Bornscheuer
F.W.
J 6/7,
M.
Bounin
D.
H 7/2
Bourgeois
C 1/1*
P.
Bourrier
P.
G 10/3,
Boye-Moller
K.
J.T.
L 4/1*,
Bozzo
F.
J 5/6
Brais
A.
J 7/3,
Brandi
P.
J 6/3
Brandt
K.
M 7/3
Brennan
J.A.
K 5/7,
Brierley
P.
M 9/9
Brinkman
CR.
P.
B.J.
G.N.
D.
F 3/2
L 10/7,
M.L.
J 8/7
Brown
S.J.
B 5/13,
Brown
T.
R.
L.
B.
Bucheri
K.P.
Buchhardt
Bui-Quoc
F.
T.
L 5/1
R.L.
C.
G 6/4
F 7/6
T.K.
F 1/1
P.
Cagliostro
Cambien
J 6/3
N 2.2/5
Burducea
Callahan
J 3/1
N 2.1/7
J.
Caldis
M 8/5
0 21
K.E.
Buttmann
J 7/5
D.J.
E.S.
J.P.
R.B.
E 1/3,
E 4/2,
F 5/3
H 3/2,
K 11/2
Campbell
F.R.
J 3/2
Campbell
K.W.
K 3/4
108
K 12/9
M 6/5
Brzoska
Burr
M 7/5
N 2.2/5
Brunnhuber
Burback
L 9/9
E 4/1*
P.
Bundy
K 12/11,
D 3/3
Brousse
Buck
M 6/2
F 5/12
Brouard
Brusa
L 4/5
F 2/4
Broadhouse
Brown
N 2.4/6,
M 3/10
K.
Brooks
N 2.1/9,
J 6/5*
Boyle
Briot
J 6/9
G 8/2
Bosser
Brandes
K 2/7
L 6/6
H 4/5
E 5/4
N 2.4/7
Campbell
R.D.
Campbell
T.E.
2/1*
F 5/2
Canetta
G.
M 3/4
Carlson
G.A.
1.1/3*
Carlton
D.
Carmignani
C.
Carreira
D.J.
Carter
Cash
P.G.
3/7
8/8
G.
Casteels
F.
Castellani
1.1/5
2.5/3
3/9
Castello
G.
F 2/1
Caumette
P.
F 6/1*
Cauquelin
Causey
M.
Cenerini
M.M.
F 4/2
D 3/4
B.
Cernocky
E.P.
Cesari
7/1
F 3/4
F.
Chaboche
J.L.
11/3
13/12
Chan
C.
Chan
D.P.
D 5/3
Chandra
S.
1/6
Chang
R.
M 3/9
Chang
Y.W.
B 1/1*,
Chargin
M.
Chatterjee
Chavant
M.
C.
Chedmail
J.F.
Cheissoux
Cheli
J.L.
7/6,
7/7
M 7/8
2/8,
2/3,
E 5/3*,
E 5/5
J 9/4,
M 111
F 6/3
Chen
C.
8/1*
Chen
T.H.
3/9
Chen
W.-H.
L 3/5,
Chen
W.W.H.
J.M.
3/7,
Chesi
C.
J
G.
A.G.
9/4
7/6
Chern
Chevallard
E 3/3,
4/9
G 9/6
G.G.
Chhatre
K 9/2
7/7
E 4/4
R.
Cepkauskas
Cernei
1/2
K 1/9,
S.
Celebi
9/4
F 6/1*
C.
A.R.
Cecconi
M 11/6
J.P.
Casini
8/1
F 5/13,
8/5
3/9
F 7/7
D 4/6
Chiba
8/9
Chiba
0.
1/2
109
Chirigos
J.N.
Chitnuyanondh
Chi
Cho
F 5/2
L.
K.D.
K 10/6,
PS. .
Chou
CK.
Chou
S .I.
Chow
J 3/5,
M 2/4
M 10/5
F.L.
Chopra
J 3/4,
M 9/5
D 5/8
K 3/7
M 11/1
P.Y.
H 3/3
Chu
CK.
B 2/4,
Chu
H.Y.
B 1/1*,
Chu
M.L.
B 5/13,
K 12/9
Chung
D.H.
Churchill
Churier
K
A.R.
H.
Ciacci
Citt
R.L.
P.
Cleary
D.C.
F 5/4,
H.
M 10/6
W.A.
Cooper
Coppi
H.
11/3
C 2/5
CA.
Coroli
1.2/4
N 2.1/8
G.
Cornell
F 5/6
M 4/4
Cords
Cort
L.
Cordier
M 4/5
G.W.
Coppens
M 5/6
1.2/1*,
Contreras
Cook
13/7
C 4/11
R.W.
Connors
M 6/5
M 5/2
K 6/4
M.C.
Combescure
Conn
F 7/8,
B 4/9,
M 2/1*
L.J.
Coleman
3/3
M 8/7
M.P.
Cofer
1/4
F 5/9
R.
Citeriey
B 7/4
2/1*
G.
D 1/2
CE.
N 2.4/9
Corwin
W.R.
F 5/12
Costaz
J.L.
J 1/6,
Costes
D.
J 6/1,
K 2/2
Courtois
Cousseran
Cowler
Cramer
Crook
Crouse
Crutzen
M.S .
5/3
B 1/6,
F.A.
B.A.
CE.
11/4
2.4/2
E 5/1
G 2/4
C.B.
K 2/3
Y.
Cullingford
110
D 1/9
P.
Cozzarelli
7/4
J 7/2,
H.
S .
N 2.4/9
M 5/9
1.2/4
Cummings G.E.
Cur ioni
S.
F 3/4
Curran
D.R.
G 6/4
Curreri
J.
K 8/3,
Curtress
N.
Daddazio
R.P.
Daenner
9/9
2.2./1*
7/11
K.
R.
K.C.
B.J.L.
1/8
11/3
5/8
F 5/4,
F 5/6
R.S.
D 2/4,
D 2/8
B.
G 10/7
M.
D 4/6
Dattaguru
Davies
I.Ll.
H 4/2,
Davis
J.W.
N 2.3/1*,
Day
B.V.
M 9/9
Day
S.M.
Deans
J.J.
Deeken
L.W.
J.
8/1
K 7/3
D 7/2
N
F.
Delaval
N 2.4/2
M 6/3
De K e y s e r
Delale
H 8/7,
7/6
J 7/11,
G.
Deitrich
2.5/3
G 4/2
M.
1/5
Del Grosso
A.
6/6
Del P u g l i a
A.
12/4
De Ngo
H 3/3
C
4/6
J.F.
1.3/3
De P a t e r
De Paz
De R o u v r a y
A.
Deschamps
P.
B 4/3,
G 8/1*
I.P.
J.K.
Dietmann
F 2/4
M 2/6
B 6/2
H.
G 2/3a
R.J.
Dimopoulos
M 2/5
2.1/9
J.C
De Vi U i e r s
Dienes
E 2/3,
N
P.
Deseleve
Devaux
Dimelfi
M 10/7
G 6/4
Darlaston
Darling
K 12/6,
N 2.4/1*
E.N.C
A.
Danisch
Das
K 12/1,
Dang Van
Dao
8/7
Y.F.
Dafalias
Danay
N 2.3/2,
W.
Dalder
3/2
A.
D 7/2
B 3/2a,
Dixit
K.B.
G 10/7
Dodge
W.G.
H 4/5,
3/10
H 4/7
111
Doea
1/3,
J.
Dong
R.G.
5/10,
Dong
S.B.
M 10/1
Donten
K.
J 4/8,
Dostal
M.
4/6
13/4
Dowling
Doyen
.E.
J.J.
Drenick
F 3/1,
R.F.
N 2.1/9,
Dubois
J.
B 2/8,
CG.
Dulac
K 11/5,
J.
7/4
Dustmann
C.H .
2.1/5
Edwards
N.W.
B 8/7,
Eggen
D.T.
Einziger
Eke
R.E.
F 6/6
M 8/5
Ellis
W.
8/3
J.R.
12/3
7/9
ElTahan
Emery
H .
A.F.
C 4/8,
G.
B 6/1*
P.
G 10/1*
Enderle
Engbaek
Engel
J.J.
Engel
R.
1/5
Engelbrektson
6/5*
Engelke
3/7
13/6
Enni s
V H. .
P.J.
Enomoto
K.
Epstein
A.
F 2/1,
N 2.1/4,
Erbe
H H. .
G 2/3
Ettei
F.
Ezawa
J 2/1*
G 4/1*
F 2/2
N 2.1/6
H 6/5
J 2/7,
Y.
J 7/9,
M 9/8
M.
F 7/7,
D.N.
Farfalett iCasali
112
M 2/5,
G 8/1*
M.M.
Famiglietti
Fanning
J 9/4,
G 4/2
Y.
E.
Ettouney
E 2/3,
K 11/7
F 2/8
J.
Erdogan
N 2.4/6
B 4/3,
3/2*
Erb
d'Escatha
F 5/10
C 4/3
J.
Elfmann
13/10
D 7/3
G.B.
Elbaz
3/9
8/4
Dubois
Duff
3/1*
H 4/7
F.
1.1/5
F 7/8
K 5/7,
K 12/11,
9/9
M 7/E
Fasoli-Stella
Fautz
P.
1/3
2/5
Favrod
J.-D.
H 2/6,
H 4/8
Felten
P.
H 5/5,
H 5/6
Feng
W.W.
Ferguson
Fiero
M 11/7
F.R.
I.B.
Filippi
Fi I l o
D.F.
H.D.
Fleischer
T.S.
Forasassi
Forkel
Fouit
Fox
1.3/2
K 12/8
D 4/3
CC.
Fleischman
Forgie
G.
H 4/1*,
9/6
H 3/4
M.
B 3/9
Th.
F 3/1,
W.E.
Frank
M.V.
R.
F 1/5
Frank
T.G.
N 2.3/6
Fu
N 2.4/7
N 2.4/9
Frank
Fritz
H 4/2
G 4/4
S.H.
Fredell
D 2/8
K 11/11
J.A.
Fisher
5/2
D 2/4,
G.
Fischer
D 6/4
J.
2/4
H 6/1*
L.S.
5/8
Fuchs
H.P.
Fujita
K 13/7,
K 13/8
Fukuda
Y.
L 12/8,
Furrer
H.
K 6/5
Gambarova
Gamby
D.
Gangl
M.
P.
4/9
H 6/5,
A.N.
F.K.
Garcia
J.L.
K 6/8
H 3/7,
H 4/1*,
F 6/1*,
Garnier
C.
M.
C 3/5
Garwood
S.J.
G 3/1*
Garzarolli
Gavarini
Gehl
Gehlen
Gehr
F.
J.
C.
S.M.
P.C.
H.-L.
H 6/6
B 4/4,
Gartner
Gauvain
13/9
M 3/3
Gantayat
Garas
D 2/1
H 4/2
F 6/3
7/8
D 2/1
K 13/1*
L 2/1*
C 1/6
G 9/2
C 2/2
113
Geidel
W.
F 4/6
Geradin
M.
M 7/1*
Gerscha
A.
G 4/6
Ghoniem
N.M.
Ghosh
C 1/2
A.K.
Gibert
D 4/7
R.J.
Giencke
B 4/1*,
Gillemot
Gittus
B 3/9,
F.
Glahn
C 3/8
S.
Giuliano
V.
M.
Glazik
L.A.
Glckner
K 1/9,
E 6/5
N 2.5/5
K 12/7
J.F.
M 1/1*
Gluekler
E.L. H
T.
Godbout
8/4
J 10/1*
P.
Gokhfeld
Golan
B 3/1*
E 4/6,
H .J.
Gloudeman
Gobert
B 1/3,
L 6/4
J.L., Jr.
Glenn
M 3/10
D.A.
L 1/7,
D.
S.
3/2
Gller
8/3,
Gomez
M.P.
G 5/1*a
Goodall
I.W .
F 5/5,
Goodman
A.M.
L 11/6
Goradia
H.
K 8/3,
Gorholt
W .
H 5/1
Gorman
D.J.
B 5/1
Gorman
M.
Goto
T.
Gotoh
P.C.M.
F 9/1,
.
S.
D 5/6
Grainger
B.N. H
Graubner
U.
Graveleau
B 1/7
M 6/5
Greenstreet
114
5/2
2.2/4
W.L. H
J.L.
Griesmeyer
B 1/5,
J 5/8
J.L.
W.H .
Griesbach
F 9/2
K 10/7
G.L.
Gregis
K 12/6
L 4/6
Goudreau
Greco
L 11/8
M 4/3
Govindarajan
Gray
8/4*
K 2/5
Gortemaker
Goto
L 2/3*
J 10/5
Goldstein
F 2/1,
G 3/2
J.H .
Giuliani
E 6/7,
B 7/1*
3/2
E 2/3
T.J.
J.M.
F 5/1*
C 1/2
M 1/7*
K 9/2
F 2/2
Griffiths
F 5/5
J.E.
Gri llenberger
Grosberg
F 8/2
T.
D 7/6
A.J.
Grover
R.K.
D 4/7
Grover
R.L.
M 11/1
Grnhagen
A.
Guelicher
L.
H 7/1
Guelin
P.
Guerreiro Ribeiro
Gui linger
Gunyasu
1/6
7/6
K 8/7
W.H.
Gldenpfennig
S.V.
2.1/4
J.
H 5/4
K
K.
11/3
Gupta
A.K.
M 6/6
Gupta
D.C.
V.K.
F 8/1
Gupta
Grdogan
Guzman
M 9/6
0.
R.
Gvi I d y s
Habedank
G.
L.M.
Hagenson
Hagiwara
Hahn
2.4/9
H.
13/9
G 9/2
J.P.
Hammel
Han
J.C.
J.
J.W.
H.C.
Hancock
Hara
S .L.
F.
Harbourne
B.L.
Hardrath
W.T.
Harkness
S .D.
Harriague
Hartley
K 12/12
K 12/12
G.
Hamanaka
F 7/6,
Hai I f i n g e r
Hallquist
S .
C
S .
B 8/2*,
B
1/3
M 6/8
F 9/1,
F 9/2
2.1/7
2/8
1/6
5/9
D 1/1*
G 4/4
N 1.3/3,
7/4
2.5/4
Hastings
I.J.
C 1/3
E.
M
Y.
Hayhurst
Head
1/3
F 2/8
D.A.
J.L.
Heeschen
N 2.3/1*
D 1/2
A.M.
Hayase
B 8/4*
L 9/5,
Hassanein
Haug
E 5/5
J 6/6,
R.L.
G.T.
Halleux
2/3
1/1*,
J.
Habip
1/6
U.
5/1*a
D 7/6,
H 7/4
F 3/3,
8/3
115
Heglin
J 3/10
B.M.
Heidebrecht
Heine
A.C.
K 11/8
J 8/2
H.
Hellen
R.A.J.
F 5/4,
Hellen
T.K.
M 5/4
Hellenberg
Heller
H.W.
D 7/4
F 7/4
M.
Helms
G 2/3
R.
Henderson
L 5/2
J.
Hennart
J.C
F 4/4,
Henning
CD.
N 2.2/1*
Henriksson
T.
W.
D 2/4,
Herren
M.
C 2/1*
Herter
J.
Hibbeler
E.
H 1/2,
H 2/1,
H 2/3
H 5/3,
H 6/2,
H 6/3,
B 6/2,
Y.S.
Hoffmann
H.
B 7/2
E 5/6
A.
B 2/8,
B 4/1*,
J 7/1*,
M 7/8
Hofmann
E.
F 3/3
Hofmann
H.
B 2/3
D.
K 6/4,
K 13/5
M.A.
B 3/4,
M 7/1*
Hoggatt
Hogge
Holland
J.A.
Holman
G.S.
H 3/4
B 8/8
Holtbecker
H.
B 3/10
Holzlhner
U.
M 10/3
Holzmann
Horie
M.
T.
G 1/2,
I.W.
H 3/5,
Horvay
G.
L 4/8
Hovingh
J.
Howard
G.E.
N 1.2/2,
K 7/5,
Hsieh
B.J.
L 9/3
Hsieh
S.Y.
N 2.2/5
Hsueh
Hua
T.R.
P.S.
L.C.
H 5/2
N 1.3/4*
K 13/12
C 3/12
J 7/9
M 3/6
Huang
CL.D.
H 1/6,
Huang
T.F.
J 2/9
116
G 6/3
N 2.4/3
Hornby
Hsu
H 6/5
F 5/3
C.W.
Hoang
K 13/12
H.K.
Hinterleitner
Hirt
L 3/6
C.J.
Hilsdorf
D 2/5
J 7/3
R.C
Higgins
K 11/2
J 2/4
Hering
Hinton
F 5/6
M 11/2
K 13/1*,
L 4/7,
M 5/6,
Huber
B 2/3
Hudak
S.J., Jr.
G 5/5
Hudman
G.D.
C 4/3
Hueckel
T.
K 1/7
Hughes
T.H.
Hughes
Hugot
Hult
D 7/2
T.J.R.
F 2/2
G.
L 11/1*
J.
Hundt
J.C.
Hunsbedt
A.
Husslage
W.
Ibanez
< 7/5, K 13/12
K.
4/1
I.M.
1/3
13/7
Igarashi
Iida K.
T.
F 3/5
A.
Inbasakaran
Inglebert
Ireland
Irisa
Irobe
M.
G.
D.R.
2/7
3/2
6/1
Y.
1/4
M.
4/3
K 11/8
Ishac M.F.
Ishiwata
S.
Isobata
Issler
Ito
Itoh
6/4
J
0.
4/6
F 4/1*
L.
Y.
Jackson
Jain
A.
P.
Jamieson
Janssen
13/9
1/4
M 5/5,
M 7/2
5/3
7/1
G 4/1*
Jakubowicz H .
Janson
'
F 3/7,
R.J.
W.
Jamet
12/8
E 6/6
K.
Iwasaki R.
Iwata K.
Jahns
L 13/9
11/3
F 6/4
K.
Imazu
L 12/8,
T.
Ikonen
13/1
Ichikawa
Idriss
1/3
10/6
P.
Ikeda
B 1/2
H.C
/
J 7/1*
6/5
1/2
L 11/1*
J.
G.T.M.
Jeandidier
F 3/1
C.
L 13/1
K
13/1
117
Jeanpierre
F.
4/1*, 9/5
Jedlicka
J.
F 7/6
Jehlicka
P.
K 13/2,
Jenkins
D.A.
C 3/13, L 7/4
Jiyawan
R.
B 5/11
Johnson
D.L.
C 4/3
Johnson
J.J.
K 3/6, K 3/8, K 7/2
Joly
J.
K 13/3
B 3/2
Jonas
W.
J 8/5, J 8/6*
Jones
A.V.
B 1/3, E 2/6, E 4/1*
Jones
R.T.
L 11/5
Jouris
G.M.
Jowett
J.
Jullien
M 9/2
J 8/7
F.
Kafka
M 3/8
P.
Kaiser
M 8/1*
A.
Kakodkar
J 10/2
A.
Kalinowski
Kalnins
A.
Kalthoff
Kamal
D 4/7, G 10/5
J.E.
D 5/1*
B 4/8
J.F.
S.A.
G 4/5,
Kamil H .
J 9/1,
Kangas
F 6/4
M.
Kanninen
M.F.
Knning
Kano
J.L.
G 9/2
T.
F 3/7,
J 9/3
Kasai
K 12/3
Y.
Kasami H . H
G.
1/7
Kastenberg
W.E.
D 6/4,
K.
G 4/3
M .
Katz
F.
L 10/5
C 3/5
Kathiresan
Kato
K 5/4,
B 5/6
Kappler H .
Kaspar
G 4/6
E 3/7
N 1.2/5*
K 4/1*
B 6/1*,
Katzenmeier
G.
B 6/6
F 4/1*
Kawanishi
K.
F 6/2
Kawakatsu
T.
K 9/4, K 13/8
Kazimierzak
Kearney
B.
D.W.
Kececioglu
D.
D 5/2
N 1.3/1*
M 8/8
Kelly
J.M.
K 9/1*
Kemter
F.
K 12/7
Kendall
118
K.C.
E 4/1*, E 4/5
K 6/4,
K 6/8
J.M.
1/4,
Kennedy
N.A.
Kennedy
R.P.
2/1*,
Kennedy
Keskinen
T.P.
M 2/8,
O.K.
Kiciman
Kiedrzynski
Kikuchi
Kim
C 3/12
Kircher
Kirmser
CA.
K 13/5
P.G.
H 1/6,
M 11/2
F 6/2,
K 9/4,
K.
Kitagawa
F 9/1,
M.
Y.
KjaerPedersen
N.
D 1/5
M.
Kleiser
K.
H 2/1
6/6
C 2/5
G.
G 4/5
W.
Knauf f
M.
J 4/8,
Kneuss
R.
H 2/6
Knowles
Ko
N.C.
P.L.
A.S.
V.
Kollmann
1/6
W.
C 4/8,
J
10/7
3/10
Kondo
S.
E 4/7
Knig
M.
M 5/1
Konter
A.W.A.
Koori
Y.
Koplik
13/1
K 8/3,
K.
Kosinski
Kot
W.
1/5
2/6
G.
J 9/1,
CA.
J 10/4,
Kottas
R.
Kowalczuk
G.
Kowalske
D.
1/2
7/8
M.
Koziol
J.J.
1/7*
2.4/9
Krakowski
R.A.
J.M.
Kratochvil
Krtzig
K 12/1,
K 5/4,
N
K 12/6,
M 10/7
K 6/8
1.3/6
G 10/2
Kozeki
Kramer
G 4/1*
K 7/1*
B.
Kordina
Kost
K 13/10
F 9/4
Kobayashi
Koch
F 9/2
10/5
Kleiber
Klemm
K 13/8
G 1/6
H .
Kitagawa
Kleist
M 6/6
10/6
G 7/2
M.
Kivity
4/3
M 4/4
A.
Y.J.
Kitade
E 6/3*
F 4/3
R.
Khatua
E 2/2,
13/5
8/6
D 7/2
J.
W.B.
2/4*
8/2
119
Kraus
S.
Krause
G 10/6,
G.
Krautwasser
Krempl
P.
C 2/1*
E.
Krieg
L 7/1
R.
Krings
6/5,
W.
Krishnan
A.
CS.
S.G.
J.
T.
L 13/5
J 9/1,
B.
Kukkola
T.
G.L.
1.2/4,
Kumar
V.
G 5/2
Kumpf
H.
H 6/2
Kunick
A.
C 3/3
Kuntze
W.M.
J 9/6
S.
H 8/5
Kuperman
K.
K 12/2,
M.
A.
Kurotobi
M.
K 13/4
K.
G 2/3a
Kuwabara
K 5/5,
Kwee
T.M.
D 7/4
V.
F 1/3
H.K.
J.F.
J 1/6,
Laflen
J.H.
L 4/2
Lafore
P.
M 9/7
P.C.
Lamarre
Lambert
Landes
K 5/6
G.B.
M 8/8
S.B.
L 8/2
J.D.
G 3/4
J.
J 1/9
Langhans
Langui lie
Lanning
Lannoy
120
A.
D.D.
A.
Lardenoye
K 9/4
F 3/8
Laboudigue
Lam
K 12/3
F 5/7
H.
Kuzelka
2.5/4
K 8/6
Kussmaul
Kuzay
E 1/2*,
H 4/3
Kurosaki
Kushida
K 5/3,
F 6/4
2/1*,
Kulcinski
Kuroiwa
J 10/2,
C 1/8
R.F.
Kuroda
J 9/8,
E 6/6
Kuczera
Kulak
M 2/7
J 9/6
N.J.
Kubota
8/4*
G 10/7
Krishnasamy
Krutzik
8/2*,
M 7/6
Krishnamoorthy
Krivy
K 12/4
K 10/4
C 1/11
D 6/3
J 10/1*
L.M.
F 9/5*
J 7/4
E 2/5,
E 6/2
K 6/8
Larder
R.A.
9/5
Larkin
P.A.
2/9
Larsen
E.M.
1.2/4
Lasker
L.
12/6
Lassmann
Lavake
K.
D 3/1*
J.
Lazzeri
D 2/5
F 3/6,
L.
Lebey
J.
F 5/10,
Lecarpentier
D.J.
Lee
J.
G 6/2*
Lee
J.J.
C 3/13,
Lee
L.
L.H.N.
K 11/4,
T.T.
W.H.
7/1
Lee
Y.S.
7/2
1/1*
1/7
Leimbach
Leis
K.-R.
B.N.
Lematre
J.
Leonard
J.W.
Leoni
R.
Leridon
A.
J.F.
Lethert
Levy
E.K.
A.
Lewinski
P.
Liebecq
G.
Liebowitz
Lievens
B 3/7,
L
4/2
5/1b*
B 4/6,
F
Lestingi
H.
F.
Limberger
E.
H
M
1/2
8/4
3/10
2.5/3
7/3
2/8
Lin
C-W.
11/6
Lin
H.C
9/3
Lin
T.H.
7/6
Lin
T.Y.
3/3
Lin
Y.J.
A.
R.W.
Liu
M.C.M.
Liu
T.H.
Liu
W.K.
K 12/10,
K 10/2
M 4/6
12/9
9/8
G 6/2*
Litton
F 4/6,
7/3
Litewka
12/5
11/10,
C 4/2
B 5/13,
CJ.
F.
7/8
Lin
Linder
7/4
K 9/2,
2/4
Lee
Th.
K 1/9,
1/6
Lee
K.M.
5/3
8/6
Lee
Leigh
G 10/3
Lee
Lehmann
J 5/6,
5/4
9/8
12/9
M 2/6
L
7/1
K 11/9,
B
1/2
121
11/11
Liu
D 3/5
Y.Y.
Li volant
Lo
4/1,
M.
T.Y.
Locci
J.M.
G 9/4,
1/3
F.
7/4,
11/9,
Loceff
Long
C.J.
2.2/4
P.
1/7
Louvet
Love
Lu
C 4/8,
W.J.
6/1*,
Ludwig
P.W.P.H.
F 9/5*
Ma
Ma
H.C
Luthra
6/5,
D 2/7,
2.3/7
D.
12/5
G.
3/3
F 1/2
S.R.
J.G.
MacNeal
J 3/4,
R.H.
T.R.
G 1/7*
Maier
G.
L 3/1*
Malcher
L.
K 13/2,
Malkus
D.S.
M 6/1*
Man
T.
Mamoun
J.
G
E.
Manzel
G.
Marr
W.W.
A.H.
E 6/2,
F.G.
F 8/1
Marston
T.U.
G 1/4,
A.
F 6/3
Martynenko
M.E.
T.
1/7
G 6/1*
Masao
T.
Masao
T.
K 7/1*
Masuda
M.
H 8/2
M 8/7
Marrujo
Maruyama
H 8/1*,
7/7
D 7/4
D.L.
Martin
12/4
E 2/1*
Marriott
C 1/11
J.F.
Marchertas
K.
1/2
D 2/1
Marchaterre
Mark
5/6
L 9/4,
R.
Marbach
K 13/3
D 5/8
M.M.
Manfredi
J 4/2
B 4/9
Mager
Malmberg
6/7
2/4
8/6,
MacGregor
122
G 4/1*
B.M.
MacEwen
9/8
C 4/8
V.J.
Macchi
8/5
A.C.
Ludwig
Lui
13/1*
8/8
S.C.H.
Lucia
9/5,
3/7
1/4
2.4/3
G 2/6,
G 2/7
Matera
L 12/4,
R.
Matteazzi
Matthees
D 7/1*
J.R.
W.
Maxwell
D.E.
Maynard
CU.
Mayr
2.1/6
13/3
1.2/4
H 6/6
K.
Mazzarella
3/4
McCarville
T.J.
2.5/4
McCauley
B 8/1*,
E.W.
McHenry
H.I.
McLoughlin
McMahon
McMaster
W.H.
7/6
1/5
C 2/1*
A.W.
Meier
S.K.
C 3/10,
W.R.
1.2/2
10/6
Mehta
Me l i g i
A.E.
Meneghini
.
F.
G 8/2
Merckx
K.R.
D 4/5
G.
C.
Meyer
J.E.
Meyer z u r
2.1/4
D 3/5
Capellen
Middleton
H.
D 5/2
J
B.L.
Mi ki
7/6
M 3/1
J.
D 5/9
K.
G 10/3,
.
A.K.
D 3/3
Miller
CM.
C 2/4
Millel
P.
Miller
Mi Ine
Misfeldt
Ib.
Mitchell
A.B.
Mitterbacher
Miyamoto
1/3
2.4/4
F
P.
1/2
G 7/2,
Mizuno
S.
K 10/5,
Mizuta
M.
CL.
N 2
H 7/2
Mohr
N 2.1/9,
C 4/7
Mizuno
L 4/7,
C 1/11
I.
Minato
8/6*
M 10/4
Meyer
Millard
K 8/2
K.
Messemer
Meyers
J 8/5,
R.
Meskouris
C 3/11
F 3/4
Mercier
Meschkat
B 8/8
2.5/7
F 3/4
S.
P.M.
Mehner
2.2/3
12/6
M 10/3a
W.
Matthews
Maurer
S.
8/9
13/4
K 10/9
1/4
D 6/2,
D 6/3
123
Moir
R.W.
D.P.
M.J.
Mondkar
Monsler
Montagnani
Moore
Moosecker
W.
1/4
I.
Morjaria
M.
E.
13/4
4/3
2/4
8/8
Morrone
A.
Mortgat
C.P.
K 3/4,
Moses
G.A.
Msinger
H .
Motohashi
Mroz
K 12/2
Z.
L
C
2/2*
K 6/5
Mukherjee
5/11
Muk h e r j e e
S.
4/3
Mukherjee
S.N.
6/9
Muki
R.
M 10/1
Mller
G.
Mller
W.Ch.
B 4/2
MullerLyda
Munro
Murray
S.
J 3/4,
K.L.
K 8/5,
J.
K.
A.N.
Nakagiri
S.
Nakamura
K.
Nakanishi
T.
Nakatsuka
8/1
3/8
1/6
F 3/5,
T.
Nakatogawa
M.
K 12/2,
F 6/2,
D 3/2
S.
F 2/8
Narayana
A.D.
W.A.
T.
7/7
M 11/6
L
10/5
13/10
Nakayama
Nashiro
12/1
H 5/3
Nahavandi
Nash
J 3/5,
M 2/4
C 3/6
K.
Nagato
D 3/6
L 1/4*,
D.W.
Mutzl
8/3
L 3/1*
Murakami
Muto
I.
J.
Murty
K 3/5
1.2/4
B 6/1*
S.
Mueller
M 3/8
F 5/9
P.
Morris
9/8
H 4/2
P.L.T.
Morgand
Moribe
M 3/7,
Morgan
M 1/4
1.2/2
E 3/1*
M.
W.E.
Morel
1.1/3*
F 7/3,
2/6
K 11/3
K 12/3
Naus
H 3/6
D.J.
Needleman
Neef
W.S.,
Nei I s o n
Jr.
A.J.
Nelson
T..
Nemat-Nasser
S.
1/3*
1.1/3*
8/8
3/10
2.5/2
Nemet
J.
H 1/1,
Nerli
G.
H 6/5
Nesitka
A.
Newman
J.C,
Ng
Jr.
D.H.Y.
Nguyen Dang
N i c ho l s
Ni i n o
H.
B.D.
T.
Nishiguchi
I.
Nishikawa
Njo
G 7/3
L
12/5
3/3
7/2
11/3
M 9/8
F 6/2
H.
G 1/1*
D.H.
Noda
C 1/5
N.
No r r i s
D.M.
Notley
M.J.F.
C 1/3
1/5
Nova
R.
1/7
Nuno
H.
1/4
Obernhuber
K 5/1*
R.
H 5/7
Oberpichler
O'Brien
T.P.
0'Connor
M.
Odar
E.
Odette
W.J.
Oehlberg
R.
Ogiwara
8/1
C 2/5
M 10/5
G.R.
O'Donnell
Ogura
Y.
K.
2.3/3
L 6/1*,
5/5,
K 9/4
1/6
I.
1/4
N.
4/4
M.
T.
F 9/1
H 4/3
Ohnuma
H.
H 4/9,
Ohsaki
Y.
1/4
M.
12/8,
7/8
8/9
Ohsawa
Ohta
T.
Ohte
S.
10/3
D 6/6
Ohmori
Ohno
D 6/5,
Ohkawa
Ohnami
H 6/1*, H 6/2
13/7
Okabe
M.
M 9/8
Okada
K.
4/5
13/9
4/5
125
F 5/7,
K 2/6
Okrent
D.
C 1/2,
C 1/4,
Oland
C.B.
H 3/2
Okamura
H.
Oldfield
G 2/7
W.
Oliver
R.M.
Olsen
Ople
1/10
C 1/9
CS.
O'Neill
R.F.
F.S.,
Jr.
1.3/8
H 3/1*
Orkisz
J.
M 7/4
Ortman
M.S.
Osterie
Otter
B.
Owen
Pagay
F 5/3
E.
R.
11/7
11/11
7/4
S.N.
D.H.
E 3/7,
Paidoussis
Pal
11/5
H 2/5
D.R.J.
Pagano
Pai
N.S.
Pabisek
1.2/4
B 4/2
N.R.
Ottosen
M.P.
N.
Palamidessi
A.
L.
Palusamy
4/4
3/3
V.G.
F.E.
D 6/3
Panzeca
T.
S.R.
G 5/1*a
J.V.
6/7,
Parmeggiani
Pasotti
A.
M.R.
Patel
Y.A.
Pattanayak
C.
Paxson
E.B.,
Peehs
C 4/2
Jr.
M 7/7
L
D.R.
H.F.
7/3
D 7/4
M.
Pendergrass
126
M 5/2
R.B.
D 2/5
Pe l l i s s i e r - T a n o n
Perla
M 6/6
Pedersen
2.2/3
B 3/2a,
A.K.
Pecherski
8/6
D 1/1*
Pauwels
Peano
F 7/7
G.
Patel
3/4
D 3/7
P.C.
Parker
10/5,
M 2/7
Panisko
Paris
8/5
F 5/2
S.S.
Pandarinathan
Paranjpe
5/3
4/6,
Palgen
C 1/10,
J.H.
G 8/1*
N
2.3/6
K 2/1*
M 10/2
10/9
N 1.2/5*
Pe r r i n
D 5/5
R.C
Perzyna
P.
Peters
1/5
G 4/4
W.
H .
6/5
Petrin
P.
1/4
Petroski
H .J.
E 5/2,
Petrequin
P.
Pettigrew
Pezzi
M.J.
G.
Pfeiffer
Philip
1/9
8/4
J 9/7,
G.
Phi l i p p a c o p o u l o s
A.J.
J.
11/6
Phillips
J.W.
2/6
L 11/4,
G.
Pi c a u t
P.
M 3/3
Pister
K.S.
1/10
9/3
5/8
K.J.
Place
T.A.
Ploeger
Pohl
E 1/6,
W.
Pollard
C.
L.W.
Ponsot
Possa
J.S.
3/4
2.4/5
G.
L 6/1*,
1/7
2.2/3
P.
3/8
Powell
GH. .
K 10/1*,
Powell
J.R.
R.
R.
Pouyet
Prachuktam
Prantl
J.P.
Prothero
10/3
K 10/3,
M 1/4,
M 2/6
1.3/2
F 4/5
F 3/1,
DH. .
CE.
Quartapelle
2.2/3
12/3
G 9/4
M 4/3
T H. .
A.
10/7
M 4/2
Prost
Pulliam
G 1/1*
G.
R.
Quirk
N
S.
Pratt
Pug h
E 5/1,
F 7/7
Pottinger
Potts
12/6
G 9/2
CH. .
Porowski
G 8/2
J.
Popelar
L 12/4,
E 4/2
D.W.
Polizzotto
K 2/7
3/8
Pietri
Pittner
E 6/5
8/4
Phillips
Piatti
E 6/1*,
8/2
L.
B 3/1*
G 2/4
127
Rabbe
P.
G 8/1*
Radini
R.R.
7/9
Raeder
J.
2.3/2
Ragheb
M.M.
1.2/4
Ragland
W.A.
Raheja
R.D.
Raju
Ram
K.S.
Ramm
D.T.
E.
D 3/3,
D.C.
Rashid
Y.R.
D 5/8
D 6/1*
P.
H 6/2
Rautenberg
J.
J.M.
Raymont
J.M.
9/3
1.1/2*
7/4
F 5/13,
S.
Rebora
H 4/8
D.V.
K 4/7,
K 7/9
J.
M 6/3
Reed
J.W.
K 4/4,
Reed
R.P.
2.5/7
4/5
Reeves
CF.
Reich
M.
2.1/1*
Remy
F.N.
5/7
Renard
J.D.
J 9/4,
J.
Reuter
W.G.
Reymann
A.
C 3/5
M.V.
Richardson
Richter
J.E.
P.J.
2.3/3
2.2/3
9/9
4/3
Riech
H.
J 8/5,
Rieck
P.J.
K 4/2
Riera
M.
1.1/5
J.D.
9/2
Riesemann von
Rigby
G.L.
Righetti
Rissone
128
K 5/2
F 5/8
T.C.
Rieger
K 13/5
C 1/6
Reuther
Ricci
L 13/7
H 2/6,
Redmer
Rest
M 4/3
G 10/7
Rardin
Reddy
6/9
G 1/5
G.V.
Reale
D 3/8,
G 10/7
J
S.
A.K.
Rawls
M 9/5
5/11
B 3/2a,
T.S.
Ranganath
Ranjan
10/6,
G 7/3
Ramamurthy
Rau
3/2a,
I.S.
Ramani
Rao
E 3/5
G.A.
P.
W.A.
K 4/3
D
1/7
5/6
13/7
8/6*
J 3/10,
M 9/5
Rivard
W.C.
Rizkalla
Roberge
Robert
6/2
J 3/4,
S.
J.
5/6
1/11
D.M.
L 12/3
Robinson
G.C
Robinson
J.N.
G 3/1*
Robinson
Robutti
4/5
H 2/5
G.
Roche
R.L.
L 4/7,
Rodet
E.
Rodriguez
Roemer
C.
R.E.
Rogalska
E.
Rouiller
Roux
Row
F.
Y.
D.G.
Rowe
H 2/6,
E 1/3,
H
2/5
9/5
2.4/6
D.S.
3/7
Rubinacci
G.
1.1/5
Rdiger
E.
J 8/5,
Rustagi
R.S.
D 4/6
Rutherford
Sacchetti
D.H.
N.
Sackman
J.L.
Sadakov
O .S.
Sadowski
A.
Sahay
B.
Saiga
Y.
K 6/8
N 2.2/3
K 9/1*
L 1/7
J 4/8,
F 9/1,
Y.
Sakuyama
T.
W.
D 3/2
E 5/6
Sangalli
D.
J 3/3
Sasagawa
K.
M 1/5
S.
Saurwein
F 9/2
G 7/2
H 1/7
M.
Satoh
K 13/10
N 2.4/4
K.
Sattele
J 8/6*
B 5/11
Sakaguchi
Salz
E 5/4
J 8/4
F.
Sakuta
H 4/8
D 6/5
G.
Sako
9/3
10/1*
Rozenblum
Sage
C 4/5
CM.
Ronzoni
L 12/2,
F 9/4
E.
Romander
L 7/8
L 12/9
R.J.
Rolstad
L 5/3,
3/7
F 7/1
E.
Rogers
J 4/2
M 1/5
J.M.
J.J.
J o/9
C 2/4
129
Savino
E.J.
Sawhney
S.S.
Sawruk
W.
Scala
1/2
C 3/10,
M.
E 4/6
Scavuzzo
R.J.
Schaefer
A.O.
1/7*
Schaller
K.
6/5
Schamaun
J.T.
8/12
Schankula
Scheibe
C 3/11
M 3/9
M.H.
W.
Schimmelpfennig
Schlafer
K,
W., III
Schlechtendahl
Schmidt
E.G.
G.
5/6
1/7
12/7
H 3/8
K
7/2
B 6/1*,
Schmitt
R.
Schmitt
W.
M 8/1*,
Schneider
Schnell
U.
W.
Schoeberle
G.
D.F.
Scholl
K.-H.
Scholl
R.E.
U.
12/7
H 3/8
B
1/4,
M 10/6
M 6/3
J.
6/4,
K.H.
10/2
G.I.
K.R.
Schulz H.
Schumann
U.
Schrkamp
H.
E 6/3*
F 8/2
Schrader
Schultz
M 8/6
1/5
Schning
Schuller
6/6
M 11/3
Schnellenbach
Schomburg
K 12/7
9/3,
1.2/3k
6/4
H 7/1
M 8/1*
B 6/4,
B 6/1*,
E
1/6
13/6
Schuster
H.
Schwiers
H.G.
H 6/3,
H 6/4,
13/10
2/3
J 3/1,
7/6
C 3/3,
C 3/5
Scibak
W.
Scott
M.E.
D 2/8
L.
G 6/4
Seaman
Seeberger
Seed
Seino
Sen
J.
H.B.
S.
G.
Sermet
E.
Server
W.L.
Seth
V.K.
Shaffer
Shah
130
1/2,
5/2
E 6/6
S.K.
Senski
4/8,
D.H.
V.N.
F 6/1*
G 2/1*
G 10/7
M 9/2
K
8/7
6/7
H 7/2,
Shankar
S.
Shannon
T.E.
N 1.1/2*
M.N.
D 6/1*
Shao
L.
F 2/6*
Sharabi
Sharpe
R.L.
Sherbourne
Shibata
Shida
Shih
9/1
J 9 / 1 , K 5/4,
A.N.
H.
K 2/6,
S.
CF.
G 5/2,
M.
Shiraki
K.
K 11/3,
Shockey
D.A.
G 6/4
H.H.
Sigal
G.B.
K 8/8
Sinha
R.K.
G 10/5
Silva
M.A.G.
4/2
5/7
M.P.
Singh
S.
J 5/7,
Smith
P.
P.E.
8/12
M 8/9
Smith
C.W.
G 4/4
Smith
E.
C 4/4,
Smith
F.W.
F 5/8
Smith
I.G.
H 4/6
Smith
R.D.
K 3/1*
Soenen
J.J.
M.D.
M.
P.D.
N 2.4/9
M.
N 2.2/3
M 3/8
S.R.
L 4/1*
H.
Stahlkopf
F 9/3
K.E.
Stangenberg
Staniforth
Steele
H 4/4
J.
Spilker
F.
R.
G 1/4,
J
G 2/6
7/5
E 1/1*
Ch.R.
M 4/3
G 1/7*
Steele
L.E.
Steele
W.
C 1/4
Steine
L.R.
B 6/2
H.
D 2/2
Steiner
G 5/4
N 2.5/3
Soran
Spence
G 2/6,
3/10
E.
Spcidel
D 2/6,
M 2/1*
Somma
Spadoni
1/6
K 8/9
CO.
Snyder
D 3/4
G.E.
Smolderen
K 13/8
1/6
Singh
Sliter
G 6/5
F 7/5
S.H.
Skrikerud
K 11/3
K 13/9
Siang
Skerget
K 4/1*,
8/9
Shimizu
Simmonds
K 6/4
L 13/5
131
S t e i n h i Iber
Stelling
K 13/2,
H.
Stephen
D 1/1*
J.D.
Stephenson
8/6
M.
Sterkel
H.P.
K 10/2
Stetson
M.B.
K 4/5
Stevenson
J.D.
Stockton
Stoker
Stone
J 1/1*,
F.D.
Stoddard
W.C.T.
CM.
Stora
R.E.
J.P.
Stouffer
1/6
13/8
2/9
C 1/1*
D.C.
7/7
B.
2.4/7
Strona
P.P.
11/10
6/6
D.
Subramonian
Subudhi
G 6/2*
12/6,
Y.
Sugiyama
Sun
N.
M.
Sugano
N.
13/4
4/4
Suwabe
5/5
Suzuki
10/4
Suzuki
13/9
Svalbonas
V.
5/7
SviatosLavsky
I.N.
S.A.
Swanson
Swelim
J.A.
Szczepinski
Tagart
T.
Takeuti
Takikawa
5/4
1/2
4/4
7/1*
F 3/7,
M 5/5,
T.
5/5,
9/4
Y.
Takezono
Jr.
Y.
H.
Takemori
12/12
L 10/1*
.D.
Takahashi
Takeda
7/2
D 5/1*
W.
S.W.,
Takasaki
1.2/4
D.V.
Tabakman
4/6
H.
Swenson
C 1/5,
C 1/7,
S.
M 4/7,
M 4/8
8/1
Tamaki
T.
K 13/4
Tanabe
M.
M 7/2
132
10/7
11/4
P.C.
Swamy
K 11/1*
2.2/4
Streibl
Stura
K 2/5,
L 4/8
J.R.
Stoner
K 13/3
7/5
H.-A.
M 7/2
M 11/4
Tanaka
E.
12/1
Tanaka
H .
7/8
Tanaka
K.
5/5
Tanaka
N.
4/6
Tang
2.1/8
2.5/3
1.3/8
R.E.
Taylor
C.
B 3/3,
Taylor
L.M.
B 5/4
Taylor
R.L.
M 4/1*
Teasdale
R.W.
Tessier
JH. .
Tezduyar
H .T.
Thangam Babu
P.V.
2.4/9
3/5
11/4
E.
F 7/4
Thomas
R.G.
H 7/4
Thomson
S.L.
Ting
E.C
Ting
Y.D.
Tbbe
1.3/5
5/6
D 5/2
Tobin
R.J.
E 4/2
Tohdo
M.
K 1/1*,
Tokarz
F.J.
Tomassetti
Tominaga
G.
S.
6/2
7/2
2.4/8
V.M.
1/6
ill
G.G.
Tremblais
F 5/13,
D 1/8,
Truffert
J.
Tsuchiya
H .
K 13/9
Tsugawa
T.
Tsuruto
C.
F 6/2
Tsushima
Y.
Turland
B.D.
P.
Tvergaard
L 13/7
G 6/1*
D.
Trbojevic
1/2
C 4/12
M.D.
Trantina
K 3/1*
J.J.M.
Torrey
F 5/3
C 1/10
Turula
K 11/5
K 4/7
Theuer
Tow
K 7/3,
M 4/8
.
Tatro
Too
D 4/1
C 1/7
Y.
Taroni
Tas
J 7/11,
JH. . K .
Tanigawa
Tao
B 5/4,
H .T.
Tang
V.
D 1/9
8/5
K 13/4
B 3/5
J
10/4
1/3*
133
Uchida
J 4/4
T.
K 7/8
Uchiyama
S.
Udoguchi
T.
Ueda
F 9/1,
Uesugi
F 3/7
S.
Ujiie
K.
Umeda
T.
K 8/5
F 9/1
Umemoto
T.
F 2/8
Uragami
K.
L 10/5
Vagliente
Vaish
V.N.
A.
Valathur
M.
Valente
G.
Valentin
R.A.
van Campen
H.
Vanderglas
M.L.
van der Hoogt
2/4
G.
J.
5/11
5/2
6/3
1.1/5
2/3
6/6
T.
1/1*
L.E.
2/2*
H.
2/3
4/8
Veith
Veluswami
.A.
Vendhan
CP.
11/6
Verbiese
S.
6/3
Verpeaux
P.
Verzelletti
Vidard
M.
Vi H a r d
Vitale
E.
Vitiello
Vivoda
E.
E.
Vlach
B.
Vogelsang
Vogl
W.F.
W.
Votava
Vrillon
134
2/8,
G.
4/4
3/2
6/7
9/4
3/5
11/11
6/3
N
D
J 9/5
9/5
L 9/3
5/2
5/1,
H.M.
Vardanega
Vaz
5/7
P.J.M,
van Renterghem
van Rij
2/3
M.J.
van de Ree
van Goethem
3/7
2/6,
D.H.
van den Hoek
Varga
F 9/2,
J 4/5
M.
1.2/4
2/5
E.J.
2/3
B.
3/2
J 7/1
L 13/10
Waas
G.
K 6/1*,
Wada
Y.
F 3/7
Wahi
K. K.
Waine
Walker
CF.
C 2/4
W.
H 6/3
Walluschek
H 4/2
B 2/6
J.S.
Wallroth
13/3
H 4/1*,
B.R.
K 6/3
Walser
A.
3/7
Walter
P.
1.2/2
Wang
C.Y.
B 1 / 1 * , B 1/8,
Wang
P.C.
Ward
P.
M 4/2
Warnke
E.P.
Washby
V.
Z.
M.
Watanabe
1/7
11/7
K 1/1*,
S.
T.
F 2/8,
Watanabe
Y.
J 4/1*
Watson
R.D.
Wazzan
A.R.
C 1/4,
W.
Wei
F.A.
T.R.
1.2/4
4/4
D 2/2
Weissbacher
L.
Weithuser
We l i e i n
H.J.
R.
H 1/1*,
J
M 8/6
J.E.
3/2
H.
B 5/2
Wesenberg
D.L.
P.H.
Wester
Wiffen
K
J.P.
F.W.
Wilhelm
C 3/5
J.P.D.
K.J.
Willaschek
Wilson
R.E.
Wilson
W.K.
Winkel
G-
Winkler
S.
2/3
D 4/8
N 2.5/1*
H.
Wilkinson
Willam
H 7/3
R.
Whitehead
13/8
E 4/5
H.J.
Wheaton
H 2/2
8/3
Weppelink
West
C 1/10
G 5/5
P.
Wells
M 6/4
D 7/3
R.P.
Weimar
1/2
K 6/1*
Webster
Wehner
4/4
Watanabe
Weber
E 5/3*
H 7/2
Waszczyszyn
Watabe
E 2/2,
8/4
G 5/2,
N 2.4/8
M 2/2*
J.
C 2/6
D 7/4
L
13/4
9/8
G 4/5,
G 4/6
135
Wissmann
J.W.
Witt
A.
Witt
F.J.
H 6/6
G 2/2,
Wojewodski
Wolf
W.
J.P.
W.G.
Wolff
P.H.H.
Wong
Woo
H.K.
3/5,
M 7/4
M 5/3
Wu
S.T.
M 10/5
Wu
T.S.
D 4/4,
Wullaert
R.A.
G.
F 2/8,
Yamada
H.
5/2
Yamada
K.
4/7
Yamada
Y.
F 9/2,
Yamakawa
T.
Yamamoto
S.
K 7/1*
Yang
C.C.
Yeh
G.CK.
A.
12/4
E 1/1*,
C 3/6
H.R.
Yoshinaga
T.
K 10/7
Y.
8/12
4/5,
H.
8/9
Youssef M.Z.
1.2/4
Yun
8/4
C.B.
Yuuki
R.
G 1/6
Zarka
J.
.H.
Zeisser
P.
C 2/5
W.
M 6/7
H.
Zeuch
W.R.
Ziebs
J.
H 1/1*,
E
3/4
G 2/3
Ziegeldorf
S.
Zimmerman
T.K.
Zolzettich
A.
H 2/1
B
1/7
3/2*
E 6/4*,
Zehlein
136
E 4/1*
B 4/5
K.K.
Zemann
M 9/8
5/2
Yoshimura
Yoshizawa
L 5/4,
F 8/5
C.
Yoshioka
D 5/8
G 2/1*
Yagawa
Zeitner
M 2/4
M 11/2
S.-C.
Yoon
N 2.3/3
8/7
Wu
Yilmaz
K 8/9
1 . 2 / 4 .,
Yerkees
G 3/3
8/4
5/1*,
Wolfer
Wrana
M 7/3
1/2
M 3/8
N 2.1/4
H 2/2
M 6/4,
N 2.4/3
CDNA07047ENC

Cdna07047enc 001 Indice

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Cdna07047enc 001 Indice

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

TRANSACTIONS

5th International Conference on

Conference organization by:

International Association for Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology

Commission of the European Communities, Brussels

Bundesanstalt fr M aterialprfung ( B A M ) , Berlin

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C.

CONFERENCE ORGANISATION BY:

CO-SPONSORING INSTITUTIONS AND SOCIETIES

Senate of the City of Berlin

Bruno A. BOLEY, Scientific Chairman and

Raymond K. APPLEYARD, C.E.C. Representative

F. CACCIA-DOMINIONI, C.E.C. Representative

John M. GIBB, Secretary of Executive Committee

Lawrence C. SHAO. U.S.N.R.C. Representative

Jean RASTOIN, SMiRT-6 General Chairman

5th International Conference on

International Association for Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology

Commission of the European Communities, Brussels

Bundesanstalt fr M aterialprfung (BAM ), Berlin

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C.

Gen. Chairman: Bruno A. BOLEY

NORTHHOLLAND PUBLISH ING COMPANY

Guido BRUNNER Member of the Commission of the

Topical S cope of the Conference

Topical Grouping of the Conference S essions

This International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Tech

Purpose and Scope of the Conference

Management of the Commission of the European Communities. Special

Solutions for Special Problems

REACTOR CORE: NUCLEAR COMPONENTS

PRIMARY COOLANT CIRCUIT STRUCTURES

TOPICAL SCOPE OF THE CONFERENCE

for the analysis of interactions of thermodynamic and fluid dynamics

Mathematical-Physical Characterization of Materials

Studies on influences of the micro-structure and of micromechanical changes

SMiRT-5 SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM

Thermal and Fluid/Structure Dynamics Analysis

Analysis of Reactor Fuel and Cladding Materials

Structural Analysis of Reactor Core and Coolant

Loading Conditions and

Seismic Response Analysis of Nuclear Power

Status of Research in Structural and

Thermal, Materials Engineering, and Structural

Structural Analysis of Magnets

1/1* Evaluation of Lagrangian, Eulerian, Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian

Coupled Fluid-Structure Method for Pressure Suppression Anal

Notes: The sign {*) designates Invited Lectures.

Session 2. Computational M ethods II

PLEXUS: A General Computer Code for Explicit Lagrangian Com

Session 3. Computational Methods III

A General Formulation of the Isotherm Migration Method for Reac

Session 4. Acoustic M ethods

Description of a General Method to Compute the Fluid

Vibration of LiquidFilled Thin Shells

A New Method for Analyzing FluidStructure Interaction Using

Session 5. Flow Induced Vibrations

A Comprehensive Analytical Approach to the Free and Forced Vi

A Theoretical Analysis of TwoPhase Flow/Fuel Pin Structural

5/11 Experimental Investigation of Pressure Field Characteristics Ar

Session 6. PWR Problems

FluidStructure Interactions in PWR Vessels during Blowdown

Coupled FluidStructure Analysis of the Core Barrel Behaviour Dur

Session 7. BWR Problems I