NUREG/CR-1957
PNL-3692
,
NOTICE
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by
an agency of the United States Government. Neither the
United States Government nor any agency thereof, or any of
their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or
assumes any legal liability or responsibility for any third party's
use, or the results of such use, of any information, apparatus
product or process disclosed in this report, or represents that
its use by such third party would not infringe privately owned
rights.
Available from
GPO Sales Program
Division of Technical Information and Document Control
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Washington, D. C. 20555
Printed copy price: $L.OO
and
National Technical Informat i on Service
Springfield, Virginia 22161
..
T. T. Taylor, G. P. Selby
Pacific Northwest Laboratory
Richland, WA 99352
Prepared for
Division of Engineering
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
NUREG/CR-1957
PNL-3692
ABSTRACT
This report evaluates the change in inspection sensitivity resulting
in major changes of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section XI
between 1974 and 1977 Editions. It was found that the inspection
sensitivity resulting from requirements of the 1977 Edition of Section
XI were not adequate to detect minimum flaws referenced by same Code.
;i ;
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I.
INTRODUCTION
II.
PROGRAM OBJECTIVE
I I I. TECHNICAL APPROACH
IV.
v.
DISCUSSION
VI.
CONCLUSIONS
18
APPENDIX I
I -1
APPENDIX I I
II -1
APPENDIX I I I
I I I -1
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.
Reporting Convention
Figure 2.
EMERGING Sound
Figure 3.
11
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
12
13
MHz Setting
14
17
KEY WORDS:
Evaluation:
vii
LIST OF TABLES
Tab 1e I.
Table II.
Table III.
v; i;
7
9
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance of G. J. Posakony
and F. L. Becker in developing the technical approach of this project.
ix
INTRODUCTION
II.
PROGRAM OBJECTIVE
The objective of this program is to produce engineering data that define the relative ability of various reference level criteria to detect
41977 Edition through Summer 1978 Addenda Section XI, ASME Boiler and
Pressure Vessel Code.
5rhis position is referenced in the Safety Evaluations of Inservice Inspection Programs for St. lucie Unit 1, Prairie Island Units 1 and 2,
Turkey Point 4, and Palasides.
-2-
Nominal
Thickness
Material
20''
20 11
Stainless
Ferri tic
TABLE I
(continued)
Piping Types Used for Test Samples
Nominal
Nomina 1
Diameter
12"
4"
Thickness
Material
Stainless
Ferritic
Flaw orientation was also varied, in order to represent crack propagation at a non-vertical angle through the weld heat affected zone. Flaw
angles used (measured from normal to the pipe surface} were 0, 15 and
25.
Calibration reflectors were fabricated into each pipe section. Both
the side-drilled hole (Section XI 1974) and the end-mill notch (1977)
were installed, though only the notch was used in data acquisition.
Each pipe section used in this experiment contained nine EDM slots of
minimum Code-rejectable size, representing all combinations of the
selected flaw aspect ratios and orientations. The slots were all fabricated on the inside pipe surface, oriented parallel to the pipe circumference. In addition, each pipe section contained Code calibration
reflectors. A typical pipe section is shohn in Appendix I. page I-1.
Finally, in an attempt to determine possible effects of instrument variations, measurements were made using two different ultrasonic inspection
instruments. These instruments are typical, and among the most common,
of the portable UT instruments currently being used in industry.
IV.
The method used to measure the response of each flaw was as follows:
The measurements outlined above were made at 1/2 Vee and 3/2 Vee paths
using 45 inspection beam angles and l/2 Vee using 60 inspection angle.
The peak amplitude reflections were measured using each transducer,
except in the case of the 4-inch diameter pipe, which was examined with
.25-inch and .5-inch diameter transducers only. The angled notches were
examined from both beam directions because the reflection geometry is
direction-dependent. The vertical notches were inspected from both
sides to average any fabrication curvature.
Since each flaw was inspected from both sides and some flaws were angled,
a {+) was used to indicate inspection from the obtuse side and a (-) was
used to indicate inspection from the acute side. This convention is
shown in Figure 1 (page 6).
The results of the measurements made from this program are given in
graphic form in Appendix III, pages III-1 through III-31.
-5-
INSPECTION \
ANGLE
Figure l.
V.
Reporting Convention.
DISCUSSION
The
-6
TABLE II
Pipe Diameter
Inspection
Angle I
Beam Path
Number of
Flaws Produci ng Re-
Number of
Flaws Producing
Total
Measure-
cordable
Evaluation
Response
Response
ments
Made
45"
45
60'
I l/2 V
I 312 v
I l 12 v
72
65
59
37
19
40
72
72
72
45
45
60
I 112 v
I 312 V
I l 12 v
86
86
l 05
25
39
51
l 08
108
108
Carbon Steel
45' I l 12 v
45'1312V
60' I 112 V
67
48
74
24
9
40
l 08
108
l 08
20 11 Sch. 80
45'1112V
17
l 08
304 Stainless
45"1312V
10
108
689
284
l ,080
63.8%
26.3%
4" Sch. 80
Carbon Steel
12 11 Sch. 80
304 Stainless
Steel
20" Sch. 80
Steel
60'1112V
Totals
Percentage
-7-
or equal to reference level to be evaluated, only 26% of the flaws examined would be evaluated in terms of acceptance or rejection. Approximately 64%( 9} of the inspections produced a response greater than 50% of
the reference level. Since the 1977 Edition of Section XI requires
flaws producing a response 50% of the reference level to be recorded,
64% of the flaws inspected would have been recorded. At this point it
must be noted that according to the 1977 Edition Section XI even though
a flaw produces a response large enough to be recorded (e.g., 50% reference level), only those flaws producing a response greater than or equal
to the reference level (e.g., 100% reference level) are evaluated. Less
than a third of the rejectable defects in this study produced such a response requiring evaluation. In addition, pipe cracks similar in size
will likely produce lower amplitude responses due to their roughness,
tightness, and possibly their location (on counterbore, on far side of
weld with one-sided access, etc.). Table III {page 9) summarizes measurement results using a 20% reference level evaluation criteria. The results
shown in Table III are not surprising; increasing inspection sensitivity
increases the assurance of flaw detection.
One final observation of Tables II and III is that the results show, as
one would expect, the ability to detect flaws in carbon steel is much
higher (roughly 2 to 1) than stainless steel. This is especially true
of thick walled stainless steel piping. T~e data in Tables II and III
also show that increasing pipe wall thickness seems to have a negative
effect on reflection amplitudes. The 4-inch pipe data show very little
amplitude change as a function of flaw angle, while the 20-inch pipe
data fluctuated considerably. This is attributed to two effects. First,
the flaws in the 4-inch pipe are about 0.6 A through-wall, where A represents the acoustic wavelength; and the 20-inch pipe flaws are about 1.9 A
through-wall. The greater through-wall dimension causes the reflected
beam to be more directional. Since the reflected beam in a thick wall
-8-
TABLE III
Number of
Flaws Producing Re-
Number of
Pipe Diameter
Beam Path
Response
Flaws Producing
Evaluation
Response
4" sch. 80
Carbon Stee 1
45'1112V
45'1312V
60' I 112 v
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
12" Sch. 80
304 Stainless
Steel
45' I 112 v
45' I 312 v
60' I 112 v
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
20" Sch. 80
Carbon Steel
45' I 112 v
45' I 312 v
60' I 112 v
102
98
108
102
98
108
108
108
108
20" Sch. 80
304 Stainless
Stee 1
45' I 112 v
45' I 312 v
1 01
101
108
72
72
108
Total
1 '021
1 '021
1 ,080
Percentage
94.5%
94.5%
Inspection
Angle I
cordable
Total
Measurements
Made
response.
60' I 112 V
-9-
-10-
'tRANSDUCER
EMERGING BEAM NEARLY RETRACES
INC I DENT PATH AND PARTIALLY
ECLIPSED BY TRANSDUCER
TRANSDUCER
Figure 2.
-11-
INSTRUMENT 8
PEAK FREQUENCY 2.4 MHz
-6 db BANDWIDTH" 1.7 MHz/3.0 MHz
INSTRUMENT A
PEAK FREQUENCY 2.0 MHz
-6 db BANDWIDTH 1.6 MHz/2.5 MHz
-12-
..
1.
f)
8.9
~
8.8
0
0
8. 7
.......
(/)
r\
I .
I\
........
. . . 8.6
I]_ 8.5
'""8.4
I
_,
w
I
I
I
uc 8. 3 +
.~a.
(/)
a. 1 r
8.8
tSl
~
<:
io:
.....
,,..
"
~-=r:=
-F
ts1
ts1
lSl
tSl
(\j
oi
Lr)
<d
a)
Frequency (MHz)
Figure 4.
o;
tSl
lSi
......
t
I
t
I
/
/'
/'
/'
./
.I
(
./
r--...
(Q
ts)
lJ)
tSS
"'t
t
I
(
~.
(I)
t"S)
"-....
"-....
"-....
0)
cs3
I
I
I
I
...........,_
0)
(\J
.......
-------------.......
tS,)
tS,)
[[r1.:J X)
cs3
roos
.......
(9
-14-
t
I
0flJl
a5
aa
aL.
ag
a~
r
0.8
0.2
t 8 y
I
tS,)
tsi
,.......
~
~
0
t
Q)
)
Q)
o-
J:
.
en
.....s::::
+->
+->
Q)
V)
::c
:::E:
0
N
ttl
+->
"'"'
ttl
s::::
ttl
0.
"0
C)
~
Q)
Q)
.....>
Q)
0::
C)
s::::
+->
::::3
Q)
"'s::::
+->
.......
.
1.()
Q)
::::3
ll...
.....en
..
bands of the receivers from both instruments. When one compares the
inspection frequency and receiver bandpass of Instrument A with the
inspection frequency and receiver bandpass of Instrument B, clearly
the inspection system of Instrument A (i.e., combination of pulser/
transducer output, receiver bandpass, etc.) operates at a lower frequency {approximately 2.0 MHz) than Instrument B (approximately 2.4
MHz). Ultrasonic theory shows that lower frequencies are less affected
by flaw angle. The lower operating frequency of inspection system A
should produce a more uniform response to angled flaws than inspection
system B.
Under another Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) sponsored ultrasonic
ISI research program, (lO) Pacific Northwest Laboratory described the
impact of change in calibration reflectors in the 1977 Edition, Summer
1978 Addenda (end mill notch) versus the 1974 Edition, Summer 1975
Addenda (side drilled hole).
The measurement program to determine the impact of the change in calibration reflectors consisted of approximately 540 measurements on 34
piping calibration standards. The standards were from a boiling water
reactor (BWR) presently under construction and ranged in wall thickness
from 0.237 to 2.343 inches with diameters from 4 to 30 inches. Twentysix of the samples were ferritic and eight were stainless steel. The
samples contained both side-drilled holes and notch reflectors according to the applicable codes. Measurements were performed using 0.25-,
0.5- and 1.0-inch diameter, 2.25 MHz search units with 45 and 60 shear
wave contact shoes. The 0.25-inch search unit was used for thicknesses
up to 0.75 inch; the 1.0-inch unit, for thicknesses greater than 0.75
inch; and the 0.5-inch unit, for the total range. A Sonic Mark I flaw
detector was used for the measurements, and a Nortec-1310 flaw detector
was used for verification on four of the samples.
-15-
0.9
-2
en
"C:J
:I:
5z
:I:
-6
0.5
(I')
(I')
"'-J
I
5z
:I:
I
_,
LJ.I
: I:
0
0.32
-10
u..J
~
u..J
UU-
-~
0
u..J
0. 20
-14
::::>
.....
u..J
:E
_ .J
0...
(I')
0...
(I')
u..J
~
0.15
-18
-20
-i 0.10
_j_
l1.0
2.0
3.0
<(
CONCLUSIONS
Major changes in the 1977 Code include reduc:ion of the inspection volume
to the lower one-third of the pipe thickness, introduction of allowable
flaw size tables (IWB-3514) and the use of notches as opposed to side
drilled holes as calibration reflectors. Reduction of the inspection
volume reduces the number of geometric indications (from the weld crown)
which must be recorded, while maintaining coverage of the area where
inservice flaws will most likely occur. The data generated in this program show, however, that the change in calibration reflectors and evaluation criteria between the 1974 and 1977 Editions of Section XI signi f icantly decreases inspection sensitivity. The authors believe that a
notch reflector is more appropriate as a calibration reflector than a
-18-
&
13 The data produced by this program allow one to vary calibration reflectors (i.e., short flaw or long flaw and angle) and evaluation criteria
and then calculate the percentage of flaws that would be detected.
-19-
APPENDIX I
12 INCH DIAMETER TEST SAMPLE TYPICAL OF ALL PIPE SECTIONS
q_ EDM SLOT
(FLAW #2)
(FLAW #3)
I-1
APPENDIX I
(continued)
~-------------------12.0----------------------~
II
I
uw Bw RAW~tu
I
LJ
FLAW 11
FLAW 12 l
rfJ<
15 <
I
I
25 <
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
I
I
I
I
63M
__-;,
FLAW #3
I oo <
'I
I
I
I
I
I
'
!
I"
1-- 1112 ~
oo <
I
I
:
I
'
I
I
I
'
~ FLAW 12
15 <
I
I
'
~ FLAW #1
'
'
'
I
FLAW 13 ~
I
! 15 <
I
'
'
1/~IM~
3.75
5 12
.
I
'
A r:LAW 12
y 25 <
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LJ
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
I'
I
I
I
I
FLAW #3
<
!25 <
1
I
'
!
I
~
Ul
'
I
I
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l.MlJ
I-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1/4-1 ~ 1 1/2
--t
APPENDIX I
(continued)
q_
o' -------.1-------.
...L
SECTION A-A
EDM SLOT
TYPICAL OF ALL
0 ANGLE FLAWS
SCALE 5:1
SECTION B-B
EDM SLOT
TYPICAL OF ALL
15 ANGLE FLAWS
SCALE 5:1
SECTION C-C
EDM SLOT
TYPICAL OF All
250 ANGLE FLAWS
SCALE 5:1
I-3
APPENDIX I
(continued)
NOTES:
(l) DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES
(2) DEBURR AND BREAK ALL SHARP EDGES
(3) I D AND OD SURFACES TO BE FREE OF TOCl.. MARKS
(4) MATERIAL FOR BLOCK MUST BE FREE OF:
A. PIPE SEAM WELDS
B. FABRICATION OR REPAIR WELDS
C. ANY LAMINAR INDICATIONS WHICH MAY
AFFECT ULTRASONIC ANGLE OR STRAIGHT
BEAM CALIBRATION
FLAW 11
FLAW DIMENSIONS
FLAW l1
00<
15<
25<
0.076
0.079
0.084
2.35
2.30
2.22
1528
1528
1528
0.081
0.084
0.089
0.200
0.196
0.190
FLAW #2
I-4
APPENDIX II
1974 Edition through Summer 1975 Addenda
Calibration Requirements
T-533
CALIBRATION REQUIREMENTS
T-533.2
(a) The basic calibration hole shown in Fig. T-533(a) shall be drilled
parallel to the contact surface of the basic calibration block or the
component. The location, depth, and diameter of this hole shall be
obtained from the table in Fig. T-533(a).
(b) However, other calibration reflectors may be used, provided equivalent responses to that from the basic calibration hole are demonstrated.
--.-r
~------1
115
l.
.~ Loc.o~oonol
"ole From
' '"
o,.,..., --d-
s.o.. ,..,..,,.,
~---------------=~-----w-h__~_~j0-15-_./_hj__l
iii'
-p-
M4~Ttl.- .....
0..1-2
c..,._
d
ol ~!led
r nGfftNW orodUc't:IOft "'""...
trJ,IIft..
U9to I l'ld.
ctt~
-~
-n
. - m.....
l/f.orr
1112 Ott
oYer 2 '""'.
0..4-
Jon
Son
7on
Ower I thN 10
Oww 10
iO<t
o-a.,... a
....
--
3/11
1/4
S/16
3/1
Soo-t
1112
1112
- -
~
,, r
1/t T
1/t T
114
11 r
It T
1/4 T
o . - l d l. ...
l/32
NOTES
Il-l
0..... /01....
11 12
1112
1-112
1112
1112
T-535
T-535.1
Calibration of Equipment
(a) Frequency- The nominal frequency shall be 2.25 MHz unless variables such as production material grain structure require the use of
other frequencies to assure adequate penetration.
(b) Beam Angle - The beam angle in the production material shall be i n
the range of 40 to 75 deg., inclusive, with respect to the perpendicular
to the entry surface.
(c) Distance-Amplitude Correction- Compensation for the distance traversed by the ultrasonic beam as it passes through the material is provided by the use of the curves shown by Fig. T-535(a) or electronically.
(1) Determination of Curves- Distance-amplitude correction curves
shall be constructed by utilizing responses from the basic calibration
hole described in T-533.2. The first point on the curve is obtained by
placing the search unit as near as possible, but not less than 3/8 V-path
or 2 in. (51 mm), whichever is less, from the calibration hole and positioning from maximum response. The gain control is then set so this
response is 75% of full screen on the cathode ray tube (CRT). This is
the primary reference response. Without changing the gain, the search
unit should be placed similarly at other positions covering the expected
examination distance range, and the corresponding responses marked on the
CRT screen. These points are joined by a smooth line whose length should
cover the examination range [see Fig. T-535(a)].
(2) Electronic Distance-Amplitude Correction- If an electronic
distance-amplitude correction device is used, the primary reference response shall be equalized at 50% of full CRT screen height over the distance range to be employed in the examination.
(d) Transfer Method - Transfer methods are used to correlate the responses from the basic calibration block and from the component. Transfer is accomplished by noting the difference between responses received
II-2
from the same reference reflector in the basic calibration block and in
the component and correcting for the difference.
The reference reflectors may be V notches (which must subsequently be
removed), an angle beam search unit acting as a reflector, of any other
reflector which will aid in accomplishing the transfer.
(1) Vessels- The transfer method shall be used at least once for
each 10ft (3048 mm) of weld or less per plate and shall be performed at
least twice for each type of welded joint.
(2) Piping -The transfer method shall be used, as a minimum, once
for each welded joint for pipe sizes 10 in. (254 mm) in diameter and
over, and once for each 5 ft (1524 mm) of weld for pipe less than 10 in.
(254 mm) in diameter.
1112 n, mn.
!r
...-1
.---.,~, ,' . R
rrz
I
""''"-lw
',
'o"'
,'C"'
10
For tn1cknen 1
tn,
or ltu
p,,~rv
'ference rnoon,.
.- ,,,,,,nc:. ,...,..
-----~~;--l----
-----
--........ __ _
............ ..
-----, --------
10
14
E19ntht of a V-peth
Figure T-535(a)
II-3
(b) Position the search unit for maximum response from the notch on the
opposite side of the calibration standard; t1en position the search unit
to obtain the metal path determined in (a) a)ove. Adjust the sweep control to display the indications from the notch at convenient intervals
on the sweep range. Mark the indication locations on the screen and
record them on the calibration data sheet.
Figure III-3230-1.
II-4
(c) Sensitivity levels shall be established using the notch and shall be
applicable to that region of the calibrated sweep length providing complete examination of the weld and heat affected zone (HAZ). To establish
calibration, maximize the signal amplitude from the first notch included
in the examination region of the sweep to 80% of full screen height (FSH).
Without changing the gain control, determine the peak indication amplitudes from the remaining points in the examination region and construct a
distance-amplitude correction (DAC) curve. This curve shall be the~
mary reference level.
(d) Where the examination technique is limited to the l/2 V path, side
drilled holes shall be used to obtain the slope and shape of the DAC
curve. A minimum of two holes, each of the same diameter, located at
l/4t and 3/4t, shall be placed in the end surfaces of the calibration
standard. The holes shall be parallel to the length axis of the pipe
calibration standard and generally conform to the arrangement shown in
Fig. III-3230-2 (in course of preparation). The minimum hole length
shall be l-l/2 in. (38 mm). Calibration shall be accomplished by constructing a DAC curve from the side drilled holes so that the maximum
amplitude point is at 80% (FSH). Once the shape and slope are determined
and marked on the screen, the curve shall be extrapolated l/4t to cover
the full examination thickness. Next, establish the sensitivity from the
inside diameter (I.D.) surface notches by setting the indication amplitude at the level of the DAC curve.
II-5
APPENDIX III
*NOTE:
III-1
APPENDIX III
11
CALL PAGES
5
0
-5
-10
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.25
0.5
f - . - - - - -' - - - - - f-
f-.----- t-------
ov
-5
-10
t-- _ _ _ _ ~%
REI:_ LEVEL__
r-
- _ _ _ _ _ lO~E.:_L~L- _
5
dB
----
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.05
-10
~0% REF. LEVEL
~-----! - - - - - -
-25
-15
15
25
FLAW ANGLE
----- INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
III-2
11
0
-5
-10
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.5
....L:
50%
--------
...__
r--,--
___ - 20%
-- --- -~
I
-5 =----- j_- _20!._ - I
-10 0
'
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.25
- - - - - - - -20%
--5
dB 0
-5
f-.
f------
- -50%
---
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
-10 t1---
-25
-15
- - - - -20%
--0
15
FLAW ANGLE
III-3
25
----- INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
0.05
11
5 ...-------------,
0 1--------+------;
-5
I
50'Yo
--- ----- ----...L. ___________
_
-10
.I
- - -
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.5
! - -20'ro- - - ...___
5
0
-----5
-----r----
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.25
-10
20%
-- ______ _
......
dB 0
-5
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
-10
-25
-15
15
FLAW ANGLE
II I-4
25
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
= 0.05
~----------------------
Ql-------.,----------l
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.5
50%
-5 1
--~~------~---------;;---- - - - -
-10
f-
20%
f----------.-5
0
-5
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.25
-10
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _20'ro _
5
dB 0
-5
50%
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0. 05
-10
-15
15
25
FLAW ANGLE
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
I 11-5
11
5.---------~----------~
--------
----r-_
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.5
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.25
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.05
!
I
-5
_2Q'r~
-10
20%
.-----------:-----------=-
-- ----------1I
-----,
I
I
-5
50%
----
-10
20%- --
.,.,...,.,..._____
!
-~----1
,,.
dB 0
-5
50%
---~
----
-10
I
I
20%
----.,....------25
-15
15
FLAW ANGLE
I II-6
25
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
5.----------------,
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.5
-5
-10
20%
____ t- __50Gfo
-5
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.25
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.05
-10
20%
----~----1
+6dB +7dB
+5dB I ---
--- Inst. A
dB 0
-5
,__ ..---- - - -
---
___.I
--
~.,.,
....
50%
~-----
-10
20%
f - - - - - -1 - - - - - -25
-15
15
25
FLAW ANGLE
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
III-7
11
dB .------------------.
0
~---~~--~~------~
I.
- - __ .I _ _ _50~c---
-5
10
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.5
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.25
____ j _.1Q%__ _
I
dB
0
-----,---I
-5
5o%
-10
II
20%
dB
0
_//
-5
"
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.05
50%
----------
-10
i
20%
------....L..---1
-25
-15
FLAW ANGLE
III-8
15
25
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
--
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
--r.-I
= 0.5
l 50%
-5
-10
20%
- - - - -.----
5
0
-5
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.25
5Q%
---~---
I
-10
I 20o/o
----+
-----
5
dB 0
-5
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.05
-10
___ ___
_
20%
___._
-25
-15
15
FLAW ANGLE
111-9
25
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.5
0
50%
-5
-10
----+--2Q!__
5
0
50%
... .. ... ,
-5
''
.,.,--,-/
'---
____ L_
-10
''
MEDIUMFLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.25
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.05
'
20% _ _
dB 0
-5
50%
---
-10
- -20%- -25
-15
15
25
FLAW ANGLE
III-10
INSTRUMENT A
INSTRUMENT B
11
5...-------r-------
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.5
-5
-10
- - - - - r 20%
---5
...--------------------~
-5
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.25
-10
20%
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.05
-25
-15
15
25
FLAW ANGLE
111-11
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO= 0.5
-5
-10
!
- - - - -I -20%
----
--- ---
----,
-5
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.25
----
-10
1
I
20%
dB 0
-5
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.05
- - - - -' -50%
--1
-10
- - - -l -20%- - -25
-15
15
FLAW ANGLE
III-12
25
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
5r--------:--------,
0 1-------+--------i
50cro
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.5
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.25
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.05
'
-5
--~-
-10
-
-- -- -
J_ _20% -
~--------------
-5
I
' _ 20cro _ _
_ _ _ _ j_
-10
-10
- - - - -I - -20%- -25
-15
15
FLAW ANGLE
III-13
25
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT 8
..
~----~~-=------1
-5
.....................
.........
........... .....
- - r :50%-DAC
----
-10
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.5
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.25
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.05
1
I
I 20'1o
- - - -------=----
~--------~-----------.
-5
I
-10
I
----~~---5 -------------~
-10
-25
~~
---------
15
25
FLAW ANGLE
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
III-14
11
0~------~/~-r--~~--~~
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.5
50%
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.25
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.05
~--~------~----~--~2~
/
/
+8dB
+6dB
+6dB
-25
-15
15
25
FLAW ANGLE
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
III-15
11
-- ...
-5
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.5
- - - - + - - - - - 50%
-10
----t--, -
-5
2~
_ _ _ _j ___ _
50%
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.25
-50
---
20%
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.05
2~
-----.-----
-25
-15
15
25
FLAW ANGLE
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
III-16
11
5
0
-5
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.5
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.25
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.05
-10
20%
5
0
)"
50%
--~------I
'
-10
I
I
----1~---5
I
I
;...
dB 0
-5
-10
- - - - -20%
---25
-15
15
FLAW ANGLE
III-17
25
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
11
s~----------~--------~
0~----------~,----------~
''
''
-5
''
',, 50-ro
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.5
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.25
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.05
-10
0
-5
-10
---20%
dB 0
..... ............
..........
... ......
...... ... _
-5
-10
20%
-25
-15
15
25
FLAW ANGLE
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
III-18
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.5
-5
-10
5
0
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
-5
= 0.25
-10
5
dB 0
-5
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.05
-10
-25
-15
15
FLAW ANGLE
III-19
25
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
0'~----------~--------~
50%
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.5
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.25
20%
dB 0
,
/
./ , - - - -
50%
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0. 05
-10 -----/
------
-25
-15
15
20%
25
FLAW ANGLE
INSTRUMENT A
- - - INSTRUMENT B
III-20
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.5
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.25
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0. 05
-5
-10
5
0
50%
-5
-10
5
dB 0
-5
-10
'
',,,..,
20%
---~---
-25
-15
15
25
FLAW ANGLE
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
III - 21
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.5
0~----------~----------~
-5
-10
o~----------~----------~
.... ....
' ....
-5
''
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.25
'
-~--50%
''
-10
dB 0
....
-5
' ........
''
' .....
LONG FLAW
ASPECT
RATIO = 0.05
50%
'''
-10
20%
-25
-15
15
25
FLAW ANGLE
INSTRUMENT A
INSTRUMENT B
II I -22
-5
'',
I
' \
-10
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
I
I
I
,~~~ -
II
= 0.5
' ../
I
I
-5
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.25
i
I
I
-10
I
20%
----+-------
5
dB 0
-5
'
-10
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
'
' /
'
I
,
II
'I
-15
20%
- -----t-- ----25
15
FLAW ANGLE
III-23
25
INSTRUMENT A
--INSTRUMENT B
= 0.05
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.5
I
~---
i
j
-5
50%
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0. 25
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
-10
/
/
r--------" "
-5
"
--r---
-10
-25
-15
15
25
FLAW ANGLE
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
III-24
= 0.05
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.5
-5
-10
-5
50%
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.25
-10
20%
------r------
5
dB
---..!---
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.05
-10
-25
-15
15
FLAW ANGLE
III-25
25
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
s~-----------------------,
0~----------~----------~
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.5
-5
10
ol--------------:---------------1
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.25
dB
1--------------+-------------1
,,...'
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.05
50,
_____ _
-10
/
/
-25
-15
15
25
FLAW ANGLE
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
I II-26
5 ~----------------------~
0
~----------~----------~
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO= 0.5
-5
~----------~----------~
'
'I
-
,.,,."'
.......- --,~
....... ...... ,.
',
~
~
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.25
500fo
-
''
-10
''
---
20%
5
dB 0
-5
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.05
50%
-'
'-----',
---~~-
-10
20%
-25
-15
FLAW ANGLE
I II-27
15
25
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
~--------~~--------~
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO= 0.5
-10
5
0
-5
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.25
- - - - -+I _29_!_ -
5
dB
-5
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.05
-10
-25
-15
FLAW ANGLE
I II -28
15
25
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
11
5
-1
-1
-1 -1'
z
C
zC
z z'
C C'
c:(
Vl - V l
0
Z
-5
c:(
-------~------- Vl
0
Z
__,
Vl Vl'
oo:
0
Z
_____ ,_,--
c:( c:( I
Z Zt
__ ....... __
- - --,.,_.c..:';_
500Jc
-a .:..:::s....._-:::-... _-..
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.5
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
= 0.25
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO
-10
20%
5
-1
_.J I
c:( c:( I
z z1
c- -1
c
_.J _.J I
--'
c:( c:( I
Vl Vl i - V l Vll
0 O l
ZZI
_.J I
-1
c:( c:(
c:(
zz 1
zzl
c c
c c l t
- -I _____,;__ _ _ _ - 1
0 O l
Z ZI
Vl Vl l- v ;
-5
0 0 1
ZZI
50%
-10
5
dB
_.J
c:(
z
c
-5
-10
<,
z z,
c ~.
c:(
Vl
Vl Vll
oo 1
-1 - II
zz l
)-
f.---
--
-1
-1
z
c
zC..')
c:(
c:(
- -~I z
Vl
L_____ 2.01:.
--...--- '
----- -25
-15
_20_!_--
FLAW ANGLE
I II -29
15
25
INSTRl!MENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
0.05
5
--l
<
~
Vl
0
:z
-5
-10
--l
--l --l l
--l
< <r
~ -~II
<
:z
<
~
Vl
:z
~I
Vl
0
--
c.:>
Vl VII
0 0 1
:ZI
:z
~------~%____ _
r. ,......
-......... ...,
, ,;
,;
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.5
- - - - - -f2Q!---5
~-----------4-------Vl--~
:z
-5
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.25
-10
_,Ji
<
:z
dB
-10
< :zt
<'
~ c.:>
_,I
- -c.:>
Vl
0
:z
-5
--l --l'
Vl Vl r
0 0 1
:z
:ZI
r----
-- 50% - - - f--
----
f-
20%
f------
-25
-15
-- --- ___ -
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.05
...
~- 0
15
25
FLAW ANGLE
III-30
----- INSTRUMENT A
----- INSTRUMENT B
11
5
0
SHORT FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.5
50%
-10
5
-II
<
~I
z,
0
-1
<,
1---------r-----Vli-Vl
01
Z1
______I _
-5
0
Z
SO,o_ _ _
MEDIUM FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.25
'
-10
...............
---- ,_.,_I ____
20%
_____
_
5
dB
-5
50%
LONG FLAW
ASPECT RATIO = 0.05
----~----
-10
-25
-15
15
FLAW ANGLE
II I-31
25
INSTRUMENT A
- - INSTRUMENT B
NUREG/ CR-1957
PNL-3692
DISTRIBUTION
No. of
Copies
No. of
Copies
Off site
A. A. Chunn
DOE Patent Division
9800 S. Cass Avenue
Argonne, IL 60439
Ons i te
48 Pacific Northwest Laboratory
F. L. Becker
S. Bush
G. J. Posakony
G. P. Selby
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
T. T. Taylor (37)
Division of Technical Information
Publishing Coordination (2)
and Document Control
Technical
Information (5)
7920 Norfolk Avenue
Bethesda, MD 20014
Distr-1
NUREG/CR-1957
PNL-3692
2 (LeN biMJk)
3 RECIPIENT"$ ACCESSION NO
7. AUTHORISJ
Februarv
(Include Z tp Code/
DATE REPORT
MONTH
ISSU~D
Apri 1
1qs:n
I YEAR
1981
6 (Lt!IIVt! bl11nl<)
8 (Lt!IIVI! blank./
Division of Engineering
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
u.s. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Washington, DC 20555
13 TYPE OF REPORT
FIN 82157
15 SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
14 (Leave olank /
17a. DESCRIPTORS
18 AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Un 1imited
21 NO OF PAGES
22 PRICE
Unclassified