Purpose: The purpose of the lab was to determine the number of moles of iron that reacted with
the number of
Materials:
Apparatus:
Chemicals:
- Flask
- Stirring rod
- Filter Paper
- Funnel
- Balance
- Wash bottle filled with
distilled water
- Bluestone
- Steel Wool
Procedure:
1. The first step was to obtain approximately 10 grams of bluestone in a beaker. 100mL of water
(distilled) was then added to the bluestone, and was mixed thoroughly using a stirring rod.
2. Next, a small piece of steel wool was obtained, with a mass of approximately 1.0 g. The steel
wool was then added to the bluestone solution and was stirred again using the stirring rod, to the
point where all the steel wool reacted with the bluestone solution.
3. A filter paper was then prepared and placed into a funnel. The solution that formed from the
steel wool reacting with the bluestone was then poured into the funnel. To ensure that all copper
particles reached the filter paper, a small amount of water was sprayed into the test tube while
poured.
4. The particles of copper that remained on the filter paper were left to dry. After drying,
observations were made, and the mass of the filter paper as well as the residue that remained
were weighed.
Appearance
Beginning
End
Solution
Solid
solid
Mass of steel wool:
0.94g
0.78g
2.00g
Calculations:
Number of moles of iron that reacted:
n= 0.99g
1 mole
5.8 g/mol
Since the mass of copper was determined, the number of moles can also be found:
n= 1.22g
1 mole
63.5 g/mol
6. The lab didnt consist of many experimental errors, however there were a few. The first
experimental error was the copper at the end of the experiment. The copper visually seemed
darker than usual and did appear to be a bit damp. This might have been because of the copper
not drying enough, and the water may have added some additional weight. Because of this, the
theoretical yield may be affected, causing the percentage yield to become higher than 100%.
Another experimental error that could also relate to the theoretical yield was the blending of the
steel wool in the bluestone solution. Whilst stirring, it was possible that not all the steel wool
reacted with the bluestone solution. So because of that, some of the iron particles may have not
been dissolved and thus blended in with the copper, making the virtual mass of copper larger
than its supposed to be.
A third and final experimental error that couldve resulted while conducting the experiment
7.
ACTUAL YIELD
THEORETICAL YIELD
x100
= 108%
The actual yield was 1.22g, while the theoretical yield for copper was 1.13g. However, a
question may arise as to why the percentage was above 100. This is because the actual yield was
higher than the theoretical yield. Like mentioned previously, the actual yield that was measured
had been altered and was likely due to an experimental error during the experiment.