Indonesia is the worlds fourth most populous country after China, India, and the United States of
America, with population of more than 230 million people. In 2008, for the first time in Indonesias
history half of the countrys population resides in urban areas. By 2025 it is estimated that about 65
percent of Indonesias population or 180 million people will occupy urban areas, primarily in 16 large
and metropolitan cities.
Regrettably, such urbanization creates severe environmental degradation in urban areas, particularly in
large cities and their surroundings. The needs of space for shelter has led to substantial loss of green
open space and been generating unwanted development of slums area in every corners of the city. In
addition, the excessive demand for transport that grows beyond the existing network capacity has
caused severe traffic congestion, loss of productivity, and inefficiency of energy. Severe air pollution
and water contamination from domestic and industrial waste are also common in our cities.
This environmental degradation is compounded by the fact that millions of countrys population are
still in acute poverty with great deficit of basic infrastructure. Urban poverty remains a big issue for
many developing countries; they mostly live under substandard facilities without sufficient access to
sanitation and clean water infrastructure.
Indonesia clearly needs a set of clear policies and programs if we wish to put urban development path
into the sustainability. This consideration brings us to consider a legal basis as top priority of our
responses to deal more effectively with rapid urban development.
For this purpose, several laws have been promulgated: the Building Law (28/2002) and the Spatial
Planning Law (26/2007). But, apart from these laws, there are established sectoral laws, such as law
on Water Resources Management (7/2004), Road Development (38/2004), Solid Waste Management
(18/2008), and National Policy and Strategy for Housing and Settlement (KSNPP) in order to provide
operational and sectoral basis for urban related improvement and development programs.
From Indonesia Urban Development Policy, I found the following indicators for the sustainability of
the policy from different perspectives;
Dimensions
Environment
Social
Economic
Indicators
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
Environment
1. Waste Management System
Urbanization directly contributes to waste generation, and unscientific waste handling causes health
hazards and urban environment degradation. Waste management system is defined to include refuse
from the households, non-hazardous solid waste, discarded by the industrial, commercial and
institutional establishments, market waste, yard waste and street sweepings which are collected by the
municipal authorities for disposal. Waste Management System, broadly deals with post-consumer
waste, in prevention, treatment, recycle, reuse and disposal. It is very important for sustainable
development.
Analysis of the policy:
Article 28 H paragraph (1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia granted right for every
person to acquire good and healthy environment. The constitution gave consequences to the
government to provide public service in waste management. It also bring about legal consequences
that the government is the entity which has the authority and responsibility on waste management.
Based on this, there is law about waste management in Indonesia. The law is Act of the Republic of
Indonesia number 18 year 2008. In article 5 and 6 mention that the task of government and the local
government to ensure waste management will be implemented in a good manner and based on
environmentally sound management. The task of the government and the local government, as stated
in the article 5, are as follows:
In article 14 is also mentioned that every producer should labeled or put symbol, on the packaging
and/or their products, related to waste reduction and handling. In this law is also mentioned about
administrative sanction if stake holders of waste management system do not follow this law.
This law is very good to enhance sustainable development because there is clear policy about waste
management system in this act. But, the most important want is related to the implementation of this
law. In the implementation of integrated and comprehensive waste management, fulfilling the right
and the responsibility of community, as well as the task and the authority of the government and local
government to provide public service, it is necessary to have legal basis in the form of act.
Social
1. Access to Housing and Related Services
Sustainable urban development through expanding equitable access to housing and related services is
very important. Decent, energy efficient homes contribute to social cohesion, improved health and
better use of fossil fuels and other resources. Housing plays a key role in urban renewal and local
regeneration. It should be the goal of any government to offer everyone the opportunity of a decent
home.
Analysis of the policy:
Housing and settlements problem in Indonesia could not be separated from society conditions and
government policies. So Ministry of Settlements and Regional Infrastructure decided to arrange
National Policy and Strategy for Housing and Settlements. This new policy is Ministry of Settlements
and Regional Infrastructure Decree No. 217 / KPTS / M / 2002 about National Policy and Strategy for
Housing and Settlements.
Based on this policy, Indonesia is trying to change the slums into more civilized shelters by
developing 1000 tower policy for what we called RUSUNAWA (rented flat unit) and RUSUNAMI
(owned flat unit). A housing finance policy has been formulated to increase the urban poors
affordability in the form of housing subsidy through banking and non banking institutions. On top of
this, since 2004 Indonesia Government has successfully managed to facilitate the development of
more than 360 thousands subsidized housing units that particularly targeted to the low-income
households in the urban area.
This policy is trying to provide adequate and affordable housing particularly poor people. This policy
particularly housing finance facility tries to make urban poors affordability for housing. It is very
important in developing a pro-poor protection. Adequate and affordable housing will bring social and
economic stability. So this is very good in terms of sustainable development.
government has already increased healthcare spending. Much of that spending increase will go
towards supporting a new health insurance scheme called National Health Protection Program
(Jamkesmas). Set up in 2008, it is an expansion of an existing scheme called Askeskin that was
introduced in 2004. Askeskin was targeted at Indonesias poorest citizens, but has grown under the
new Jamkesmas format to include many of the countrys near-poor, taking in 76 million people, or
one third of the population.
This policy is needed for social aspect in sustainable development. This policy tries to integrate the
health concerns, particularly most vulnerable populations, into strategies, policies and programmes for
poverty eradication and sustainable development. But it remains question in terms of economic sector
particularly in terms of financing this policy. What role the private sector will play in providing
services under the scheme, and how the government will manage the escalating costs.
locations, and poverty reduction in origin locations. At the same time, while migration can to a certain
extent offset labour surpluses in sending countries, receiving countries are taking on associated
multiple challenges, including managing labour markets. These challenges will require countries to
create policy and legal frameworks that recognize the patterns and drivers of migration, as well as the
characteristics of migrants themselves.
Analysis of the policy:
The transmigration program is the policy of Indonesia government to move landless people from
densely populated areas of Indonesia to less populous areas of the country. The stated purpose of this
program was to reduce the considerable poverty and overpopulation on Java, to provide opportunities
for hard-working poor people, and to provide a workforce to better utilize the natural resources of the
outer islands. The stated purpose of the program, according to proponents in the Indonesian
government and the development community, was to move millions of Indonesians from the densely
populated inner islands of Java, Bali and Madura to the outer, less densely populated islands to
achieve a more balanced population density.
This policy would alleviate poverty by providing land and new opportunities to generate income for
poor landless settlers. It would also benefit the nation as a whole by increasing the utilization of the
natural resources of the less-populous islands. This is very good not also for sustainable urban
development but also for sustainable national development.
Economic
1. Employment Creation
In terms of sustainable development, there is a challenge to develop policies and strategies to generate
decent and productive jobs. Recognizing the role of the private sector for growth, employment
creation and poverty reduction, countries need to engage in a process of sound economic reform,
particularly tackling the promotion of an enabling business environment and the adequacy of the
education system, which the labor market needs.
Analysis of the policy:
In the past three years, the Government of Indonesia has pursued an aggressive minimum wage
policy, sought to introduce wide-ranging new labor protection laws and, strengthened the union
movements voice in industrial relations. New safeguards regarding worker rights and more
systematic regulation of minimum labor standards have created a much fairer environment for formal
sector workers than in the past. However, many of the new regulations seeking to protect workers go
well beyond the affirmation of minimum standards and basic rights.
This policy has positive and negative impact in terms of sustainable development. In positive impact
we can see that it will give benefit for labor protection. But it is also negative impact regarding to
employment growth sector. Aggressive minimum wage policy can bring negative impact particularly
in business sector. If the government requires that certain workers be paid higher wages, then
businesses make adjustments to pay for the added costs, such as reducing hiring, cutting employee
work hours, reducing benefits, and charging higher prices. Some policymakers may believe that
companies simply absorb the costs of minimum wage increases through reduced profits, but that's
rarely the case. Instead, businesses rationally respond to such mandates by cutting employment and
making other decisions to maintain their net earnings. These behavioural responses usually offset the
positive labour market results that policymakers are hoping for.
2. Taxation System
Taxation system is needed to increase tax revenue so that can promote sustainable economic growth.
Along with economic growth, income inequality is an important tax policy objective. Taxes are
instruments for the redistribution of income and welfare between different household groups.
Normally, a tax system is considered to have a positive effect upon income distribution and welfare if
lower-income groups pay less than higher ones, as exemplified in many countries progressive income
tax policies. A good tax system should be used as a policy instruments not only to protect the lowincome household from paying an undue amount of tax but also to reduce the number of households
below the poverty line.
Analysis of the policy:
The main Indonesian Tax Law is General Provisions and Taxation Procedures Law (Law No. 6/1983,
amended by Law no.16/2000). This law provides who exactly is obligated to pay tax.
Individuals or statutory bodies which meet relevant criteria stipulated, including certain tax collectors
or withholders. Statutory bodies are defined by Indonesian Taxation Law as groups of persons and/or
capital which constitute a unit. These are more clearly defined as such entities undertaking or not
undertaking businesses, covering limited liability companies, limited partnership companies, other
companies, state or regional administration-owned companies in whatever names and forms, firms,
joint companies, cooperatives, pension funds, partnerships, groups, foundations, mass organisations,
social and political organisations or organisations of the same type, institutions, permanent
establishments and other forms of statutory bodies. Companies and entrepreneurs are defined in the
context of Indonesian Taxation Law as those in their business activities or works/jobs produce goods,
import goods, export goods, undertake trading businesses, utilize goods, provide or utilize services
from regions outside the customs area.
There are several specific taxes as the continuance of General Provisions and Taxation Procedures
Law (Law No. 6/1983, amended by Law no.16/2000). But it is the main or general law for taxation
system in Indonesia. This law only mentions about general provision about tax. More detail about tax
like some typical of tax and also the amount of tax has its own specific law. This law is good because
it mentions clearly who exactly is obligated to pay tax. It is important particularly in terms of
sustainable economic growth and sustainable development. It is also important not only for economic
dimension but also social dimension. Good taxation system will reduce the number of household
below the poverty line by distributing tax money in appropriate way for development.
Conclusion
These strategic laws and policies are mutually complementary, and evidently signify important steps
in urban policy in Indonesia. However, solid regulation and strict law enforcement are further
necessary in order to maintain urban development in the right direction.
The strategic vision of the policies in general is to achieve safe, comfortable, productive and
sustainable urban development. Productive and sustainable means that development should provide
effective and efficient infrastructure to facilitate the production and distribution process of the
economy to increase added value, achieve community welfare and enhance competitiveness; while at
the same time provide better quality of environment not only for current generation but also for the
future generation.
Facing these clear challenges today is timely to rethink and reshape urban development policies and
programs, taking into account as much lessons as possible from the past and the demand of the future.
Hence, there is needed to gear the path towards sustainable urban development through balancing
economic, social-cultural and environmental dimensions.
In order to be able to respond to this big challenge, we need to underline that reliable government,
strong and clear urban development policies, capacity building for key stakeholders and active public
participation are crucial elements that must be put in place. In the future, these require more creative
and innovative urban development practices towards sustainability, then, it is time to move onto
implementation side of urban development agendas.
References
Iwan, Azis (2000). Development and Sustainable Future: The Environmental Dimension of
Indonesias Socio-Economic Progress: Presented at the International Conference on
Sustainable Future of the Global System, United Nations University, Tokyo, May 24-28.
Republic of Indonesia (2004) Law No 40 year 2004
Republic of Indonesia (2008) Law No 18 year 2008
Republic of Indonesia (2002) Law No 28 year 2002
Republic of Indonesia (2007) Law No 26 year 2007
Republic of Indonesia (2004) Law No 7 year 2004
Republic of Indonesia (2004) Law No 38 year 2004
Republic of Indonesia (2004) Law No 21 year 2011
Republic of Indonesia (2000) Law No16 year 2000
Ministry of Settlements and Regional Infrastructure Decree No. 217/KPTS/M/2002
Sugiri, Agung (2008). Planning for Sustainable Urban Development: Some Issues on the Policy to
Develop of a New Large Settlement in Mijen Suburb of Semarang, Indonesia. Departement
of City and Regional Planning, Engineering Faculty, Diponegoro University.
Widjaja, Muliadi (2011). Social Protection in Indonesia: How Far Have We Reached? University of
Indonesia.