Anda di halaman 1dari 101

,JV

WPQ80
Policy Research

WORKING PAPERS
Educationand Employment

Department
Technical

LatinAmericaand the CaribbeanRegion


The WorldBank
December1992
WPS 1056

Earningsand Education
in LatinAmerica
AssessingPriorities
for SchoolingInvestments

George Psacharopoulos
and
YingChu Ng

In most Latin Americancountries, the earnings premium receivedby graduatesof highereducationdecreasedin the 1980s.
Investmentin primaryeducationshowsthe highestrate of return
among all levels considered.
ideasamongBankstaff
thefindingsof workin progressandencouragetheexchangeof
ThePolicyResearchWorkingPapersdissemninate
bytheResearchAdvisoryStaff,carrythenamesof theauthors,
andall othersinterestedindevloprenttissues Thesepapers,distLibuted
andconclusionsaretheauthors'own.They
reflectonlytheirviews,and
shouldbeusedandcitedaccordingly.Thefmdings,intespretations,
shouldnot be attributedto theWorldBank,its Boardof Dircwtors,its management,or any of its membercountries.

PolicyResearchl

Educationand Employment

WPS 1056

This paper- a product of the Technical Department, Latin America and the Caribbean Region - is part
of a larger effort in the department to document the role of education in the region's development efforts.
Copies of the paper are available free from the World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433.
Please contact Liliana Longo, room 14-187, extension 39244 (December 1992, 93 pages).
Psacharopoulos and Ng use household survey
dzta for 18 Latin American countries to assess
earnings differentials by level of education, and
to assess how these differentials changed in the
1980s.
Introducing the cost of education allows
them to estimate private and social rates of return
on investments on education across several
dimensions: by gender, by level of education, by

sector of employment, by nature of the secondary school curriculum, and over time.
The results show that, in most countries, the
earnings premium received by graduates of
higher education decreased in the 1980s. Investment in primary education shows the highest rate
of return among all levels considered - and is
still the number one investment priority in most
countries.

The PolicyResearchWorkingPaperSeriesdisseminatesthefindingsof workunderwayin theBank.Anobjectiveof theseries


is to get these findingsout quickly,even if presentationsare less than fully polished.The findings,interpretations,and
conclusionsin thesepapersdo not necessarilyrepresentofficialBankpolicy.
Producedby the PolicyResearchDisseminationCenter

EARNINGS AND EDUCATION IN LATIN AMERICA:


ASSESSING PRIORITIES FOR SCHOOLING INVESTMENTS

George Psacharopoulos
Ying Chu Ng
Technical Department
Latin America and the Caribbean Region
The World Bank

TAxi OF CONTW8
I. Introduction .. .. .. . .. .,,,,,.,,,,.,
.........
.... v.
.1

II. Methodology ...................................


The Full Discounting or Elaborate Method ................
The Earnings Function Method ...............................
The Short-cut Method .
.........
. .....
.

III.Empirical Findings

.....

.
..

..

6
,......

.............

..

..

.....

. ...
.

Basic EarningsFunctions ...................................


OvertimeChangesin Relative Earnings
..
Overtime Returns to Education .......................
.....
Extended Earnings Functions ....
..
.............
. .
......
SecondaryGeneral
versus Vocational
Education
...
.
...........
Private Returns to Education
...................
Social Returns to Education .... ...................
......
IV. Conclusion ...

.......

9
14
20
25

28
29

31
. 37

References .......

39

Annex1. Survey Data Description.0.00000.....0.0.0.41


Annex2. VariableDefinitions ..

..

....

Annex3. BasicEanings Functions .....


Annex 4. Extended Earnings Functions .....

.44

0.0......

.............

............

0...

48
77

LIST OF TABLES

1. Mean Earnings, Years of Schoolingand Mincerian Returns to Education: Entire


Sample, circa 1989 ...........
;.......

10

2. Mean Earnings, Years of Schoolingand MincerianReturns to Education:by Gender,


circa 1989
....
..

12

3. Mean Eamings, Years of Schoolingand MincerianRetums to Education: by Sector,


circa 1989..

13

4. Over Time Earnings Differentialsby EducationalLevel .15


5. Over Time EducationalAttainmentof the Labor Force .18
6. Mean Earnings, Years of Schooling and Mincerian Returns to Education: Entire
Sample, circa 1980
...............

.21

7. Mean Earnings, Years of Schoolingand Mincerian Returns to Education: by Gender,


circa 1980
..

22

8. Mean Earnings, Years of Schoolingand Mincerian Returns to Education: by Sector,


circa 1980 .24
9. Mean Earnings and Mincerian Returns to Education: by Level of Education ......

26

10. Private Retums to Educationby Level of Education: Full Method .30


11. Social Direct Unit Cost per Year by Level of Education.33
12. Social Returns to Educationby Level of Education:Full Method
13. Index of Public Subsidizationof Education by Level

......

35
38

Lwsr OFFIGURES

1. Age - Earnings Profiles by Level of Education, Brazil 1989 ................


2. Time Trend of Earnings Differentials by Level of Education in Four Countries ....

5
17

I. INTRODUCrION

The study of the relationshipbetween earnings and education has been the cornerstone
of the economics of education. There are several reasons why this relationship has been
investigated extensively throughout the world since "human capital" was established in the
economic growth and developmentliterature in the early 1960s (see Schultz, 1961).

First, differencesin mean earnings between graduatesof successivelevels of education


reflect the premium associated with educational investment. This premium is definitely
"private", in the sense that it accrues to the person who undertook the investment. Under
certain conditions, however, this premium can also be used as a proxy for the higher social
productivityof the graduate, e.g. as evidencedby earningsdifferentialsin the competitivesector
of the economy. Thus, earnings differentials by level of education provide an expedient,
empirical way of documenting first order relative scarcities in the market for graduates in a
given society, and may provide a guide for educationalinvestments.

Second, the above earnings premium can be combined with the cost (either private or
social) of investing in different levels of education, thus leading to a cost-benefit analysis of
investmentin schooling,which is very similarto traditionalcost-benefitanalysisin other sectors
of the economy. Since the 1960s there has been an immense literature devoted to the
profitability of investmentsin human capital. Estimates of such profitability are better known
as "rates of return to investmentin education"(for a review see Psacharopoulos, 1985a).

-2Third, and beyond the above efficiencyconsiderations,the earnings premium associated


with different levels of education leads to equity assessmentsin a given society, e.g. how does
the provision of education, and at what level, contributesto poverty alleviationor a more equal
income distribution?

The purpose of this paper is to present evidenceon the relationshipbetween earningsand


education in Latin America for the latest year possible, and to discuss the implicationsof the
findingsfor school investmentpriorities in the region. The analysisis necessarilymacro, in the
sense that a large number of countries has been covered, using a consistent methodology,
althoughat the expense of performing more detailedwithin-countryanalyses. Thus the findings
presented here should be consideredas indicativeregarding educationalinvestmentpriorities in
the region, pending more detailed country-specificwork.

This study improves upon the previous cross-country studies by applying a consisten.
mrethodologyof estimation!'. Moreover, the database comes from representativenational data
sets of the countries in question. The data also allow for the study of time trends of rates of
return to cducation, as well as assessing the profitability of different types of the secondary
school curriculum.

The next section presents the methodologyof estimation, followed by a sectionon the
evidence. The implicationsof the findings are discussedin the concluding section.

I/ Previousstudieson the returnsto educationin LatinAmericaare listedin the Peferences.

-3II. MErHODOLOGY

Estimates of the profitabilityof investmentin educationcan be arrived at using different


methods. The methodadoptedby various authors is often dictatedby the nature of the available
data. In what follows we briefly describe the availablemethodsas backgroundto the estimates
,we present later in this paper.

(1)

The Full Discountinlgor Elaborate Method


This method amountsto finding the discount rate (r) that equates a stream of benefits to

a stream of costs at a given point in time:


(y(+C)C(+r)
*

=
:-+1(

+r)

(1)

t-I

where (Yb-Ya)tis the earnings differentialbetweena more educated person (subscript b) and a
less educatedperson (subscripta, the controlgroup). Cb represents the direct costs of schooling
consisting of tuition and fees, books, etc., and Y. denotes the student's foregone earnings or
indirect costs.

On the assumptionthat the direct costs of acquiring the next higher level of education are
roughly the same as the income one would earn from part-timeor summerjob during the study,
equation (1) can be simplifiedto:

-4t r)'
*"1

S(Y,)S(l

+r)

(2)

Thereis an importantasymmetrybetweencomputingthe returnsto primaryeducation


and thoseto the otherlevels. Primaryschoolchildren,mostlyaged6 to .2 years,do not forego
earningsduringthe entirelengthof theirstudies. In theempiricalanalysisthat followswe have
assumedonly two years of foregoneearningsfor primaryschoolchildren.

The resultingr by solvingthe aboveequationcan be consideredto be a "private"rate


of return. When the direct cost paid by the individualis replacedby the true full cost of
someone'seducation(paidby the statein mostcountries)one can arrive at a "social"rate of
return. Privaterates of return are used to explainpeople's behaviorin seekingeducationof
differentlevelsand types, and as distributivemeasuresof the use of publicresources. Social
rates of return,on the otherhand,can be usedto set investmentprioritiesfor futureeducational
investments.

The discoundngof actual net age-earningsprofilesis the most appropriatemethodof


estimatingthe returnsto educationbecauseit takesintoaccountthe mostimportantpart of the
earlyearninghistoryof the individual. But this methodis very thirstyin termsof data -- one
must have a sufficientnumber of observationsin a given age-educationallevel cell for
constructing"well-behaved"age-earningsprofiles. (An exampleof such profile is given in
Figure 1.) This has beenrarelythe case in the earlydaysof the economicsof education,and
thus researchershave resortedto lessdata-demanding
methods.

iXf

<

Co

%.~~~~~~~

0~~

o~~
-

o
r

-6-

(2)

The EarningsFunctionMethod
This method is derived from Mincer (1974) and involves the fitting of a function

specifiedas:
In1I- a +,PSI+Y,EX
4 +Y2EX2+eI,

(3)

where S is the numberof years of schoolingof individuali, and EX and EX2 are years of
experienceand its square, respectively. Oftenweeks-workedor hours-workedare added as
independentvariablesto this functionas compensatoryfactors. We call the above a "basic
earningsfunction." In this semi-logspecificationthe coefficientof S (O)can be interpretedas
the average private rate of return to one additionalyear of schooling,regardlessof the
educationallevel this year of schoolingrefers to.

The earningsfunctionmethodcan be usedto estimatereturnsto educationat different


levels by convertingthe continuousyears of schoolingvariable(S) into a series of dummy
variables, say PRIM, SEC, UNIV, to denote the fact that a person has completedthe
correspondinglevelof education,and that of coursethereare also peoplein the samplewithno
educationin order to avoidmatrixsingularity.

Then, after fittingthe following"extendedearningsfunction":


lnYI' g+P,PR!M
1+f32SEC,+P,UN7Vl+y
1EX1+y2Ei+e.

(4)

the private rate of return to different levels of education can be derived from the following
formulas:

r(PRJM =

SPRIM

r(m

TU
t

SSEC-S
S-

where SpRIM,
SsEc,and SU,Vstand for the total numberof years of schooling for each successive
level of education(primary educationcompleted,secondaryeducationcompleted,and university
educationcompleted,respectively). Again, care has to be taken regarding the foregone earnings
of primary school-agedchildren. In the empirical analysis that follows we have assigned only
two years of foregone earnings to this group.

Althoughconvenient, because it requires less data, this methodis slightly inferior to the
previousone as it in fact assumesflat age-earningsprofiles for differentlevels of education (see
Psacharopoulosard Layard, 1979).

-8 (3)

The Short-cutMethod
This estimation method is based on a simple formula:

*= S(t*-,)

where Y refers to the mean earnings of an individualwith the subscripted educationallevel, k


is the higher educationallevel in the comparison,and AS represents the difference in years of
schoolingbetween k and the control group.

Althoughthis method is very easy to use, it is by definitionvery inferior relative to,any


of the other methodsdescribedabove. The weaknessof the method lies in the abstraction from
the fact that age-earningsprofiles are concave (see Figure 1), and that the discountingprocess
(in estimating the true rate of return) is very sensitive to the values of the early ages entering
the calculation. Hence we will not use this method in the empirical analysis that follows.

IH. EMPIRCALFmDIGS

The data used in this analysiscome from a series of HouseholdSurveysconductedin the


region around 1989. For some countries the same survey was also conducted around 1980.
Details on the nature of the surveys appear in Annex 1. Variable definitionsappear in Annex
2.

-9-

A. Basic Earnings Functions


As a way of summarizingthe data, we first fit basic earnings functions (see Annex 3).
Table 1 shows the resulting average rate of return, along with the mean years of schooling of
the sample. In comparing mean years of schoolingacross counties, it should be noted that the
countries with the highest mean years of schooling,Bolivia and Peru, refer to urban samples.

Among the eighteencountries, twelveof them have an average return to schoolingof 10


percent or above. The mean of years of schoolingranges from 4.3 to 10.1 years. The lowest
mean years of schooling are found in Guatemala and Brazil, while Boliviansand Peruvians
generally have more than 10 years of schoolingbecause of the urban nature of the samples. It
is not surprising, therefore, to find that the average private rate of return to schoolingin Bolivia
and Peru is relatively lower than that in Guatemalaand Brazil.

- 10

Table.it Mean Earnings, Years of Schoolingand Mlncerian Returns to Education:


Entlre Samplecirca 1989
Country

Survey

Earnings

Mean

Rateof

Year

(in local
currency)

Years of
Schooling

Return (%)y

Argentina

1989

7,456

9.1

10.3

Bolivia

1989

364

10.1

7.1

Brazil

1989

6,969

5.3

14.7

Chile

1989

40,275

8.5

12.0

Colombia

1989

53,643

8.2

14.0

Costa Rica

1989

16,346

6.9

10.9

DominicanRepublic 1989

652

8.8

9.4

Ecuador

1987

27,313

9.6

10.8

El Salvador

1990

899

6.9

9.7

Guatemala

1989

242

4.3

14.9

Honduras

1989

453

6.5

17.6

Jamaica

1989

5,886

7.2

28.8

Mexico

1984

81,029

6.6

14.1

Panama

1989

292

9.2

13.7

Paraguay

1990

239,861

9.1

11.5

Peru

1990

9,912

10.1

8.1

Uruguay

1989

145,840

9.0

9.7

Venezuela

1989

6,894

9.1

8.4

Source:Annex3.
Notes: I' Coefficientof theyears-of-schooling
variablein thebasicearningsfunction,times100.

11 -

The earnings functions have been fitted to male and female sub-samples in order to
examine differences in returns to education by gender. As seen in Table 2, working females
generally attain more educationthan their male counterpartsin all countriesexcept Ecuador, El
Salvador, Paraguay, and Peru. This, however, does not gives femalesan advantageover males
in acquiring better pay in absolute terms. The mean earnings of each country shows that males
in fact earn more than females2'. However, the rate of return being a reli

concept, this

does not prevent females realizing a higher payoff than men to their schooling investment in
fifteen out of the eighteen cases reported in Table 2.

Table 3 presents the results of an alternativepartitioningof the sample into public and
private employment. As foundelsewhere,public sector employeeshave more years of schooling
than their private sector counterparts, and also a lower rate of return on their schooling
investments (Psacharopoulos,1983).

2/ For a more detailedanalysisof the male-femaleearningsdifferentialsusingthe samesamplesand


selectivitycorrection,see Psacharopoulos
and Tzannatos(1992a)and (1992b).

- 12 -

Table 2. Mean Earnings, Years of Schooling and Mincerian Returns to Education:


by Gender, circa 1989
Country

Year

Earnings
(ocal curr.)
Males

Females

Years of
Schooling

Rate of Return
(percent)

Males Females

Males Females

Argentina

1989

8,563

5,629

8.7

9.8

10.7

11.2

Bolivia

1989

402

270

9.5

11.5

7.3

7.7

Brazil

1989

7,151

6,640

5.0

5.9

15.4

.14.2

Chile

1989

43,878

31,373

8.2

9.4

12.1

13.2

Colombia

1989

60,592

43,124

8.1

8.3

14.5

12.9

Costa Rica

1989

17,283

13,928

6.4

8.1

10.5

13.5

Dominican Republic

1989

722

522

8.4

9.5

7.8

12.0

Ecuador

1987

32,049

19,360

9.7

9.5

9.8

11.5

El Salvador

1990

988

766

7.0

6.7

9.6

9.8

Guatemala

1989

256

207

4.0

4.8

14.2

16.3

Honduras

1989

488

384

6.1

7.1

17.2

19.8

Jamaica

1989

9,829

1,047

7.0

7.4

28.0

31.7

Mexico

1984

84,520

71,533

6.3

7.5

14.1

15.0

Panama

1989

312

258

8.6

10.1

12.6

17.1

Paraguay

1990 290,496

165,787

9.1

8.9

10.3

12.1

Peru

1990

11,482

6,937

10.2

9.8

8.5

6.5

Uruguay

1989

178,086

97,865

8.7

9.3

9.0

10.6

Venezuela

1989

7,858

6,067

7.9

10.2

8.4

8.0

Source:Annex3.

13 -

Table 3. Mean Earnings, Years of Schoolingand Mincerian Returns to Education:


by EmploymentSector, circa 1989
Country

Year

Earnings

Years of Schooling

(localcurr.)

Rate of Return
(percent)

Private

Public

Private

Public

Private

Public

Argentina

1989

7,155

8,463

8.5

11.C

11.1

8.9

Bolivia

1989

361

369

8.7

11.7

8.7

6.7

Brazil

1989

9,979

7,746

4.1

8.2

15.0

11.4

Chile

1989

38,232

58,044

8.1

12.3

11.4

11.2

Colombia

1989

50,279

80,116

7.8

11.2

13.7

11.9

Costa Rica

1989

14,245

26,079

6.2

10.1

9.3

8.5

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

DominicanRepublic 1989
Ecuador

1987

26,254

32,258

8.9

12.8

11.3

7.1

El Salvador

1990

835

1,215

6.1

10.9

9.4

6.2

Guatemala

1989

219

455

3.7

9.1

14.1

8.7

Honduras

1989

406

714

5.9

9.9

17.4

12.3

Jamaica

1989

6,443

3,140

6.9

8.5

24.9

16.0

Mexico

1984

73,448

108,503

5.7

9.7

15.4

8.0

Panama

1989

232

434

8.2

11.5

12.2

11.0

Paraguay

1990

,236,360

264,629

8.6

12.6

11.9

8.3

Peru

1990

8,002

10,295

9.6

12.5

9.0

9.0

Uruguay

1989

146,073

145,069

8.6

10.2

10.5

5.7

Venezuela

1989

6,700

7,037

7.3

10.5

9.7

Source: Annex3
n.a. = not available

6.6

- 14 -

B. OvertimeChangesin Relative Earnings


Before we turnto the discussionof the time trends of the rate of return to schooling, let
us examine the behavior of earnings differentialsin Latin American countries. Owing to the
availability of data, calculation of earnings differentialsover time is only allowed for twelve
countries. Table 4 presents the earnings differentialsin absolute and index values by level of
education, and Table 5 provides the corresponding structure of the labor force by level of
education.
N.

As seen in Table 4 and depicted in Figure 2, the relative earnings of individualswith


either secondaryor universityeducationdecreasedover time in most conntrieswith the exception
of Bolivia, Guatemala and Panama. This is expected since the number of workers as a
percentage of the labor force with post-compulsoryschooling increased during the same time
period in all countriesexpect Hondurasl'. This implies a strong relationship between schooling
and income distributionin society. Earnings differentialsnarrow as the educationalattaintment
of the labor force increases.

I/ The overtimecomparability
of theHonduras,PeruandUruguaydatasets is limitedgiventhe factthe
later surveysrefer only to urban areas.

15-

Table 4. Over Time Earnings Differentials by Educational Level


EarningsOocalcurr.)
Country
EducationalLevel
(Early-Late)

Index(Prim.=100)

Early

Late

Early

Late

n.a.
511
615
976
2,381

2,724
4,099
4,843
7,757
13,231

n.a.
83
100
159
387

56
85
100
160
272,

Argentina
1980-89

No Education
Lessthan Primary
Primary
Secondary
University

Bolivia
1986-89

No Education
Primary
Secondary
University

134,311
208,855
235,632
463,970

268
281
363
795

64
100
113
222

95
100
129
283

Brazil
1979-89

No Education
Primary
Secondary
University

7,399
10,791
17,398
39,934

5,257
7,145
8,772
17,658

69
100
161
370

74
100
123
247

Colombia
1980-89

No Education
Primary
Secondary
University

3,690
5,643
12,719
31,413

24,004
36,769
57,529
145,487

65
100
225
557

65
100
156
396

CostaRica
1981-89

No Education
Primary
Secondary
University

1,256
1,437
2,763
5,043

10,389
13,222
20,956
42,323

87
100
192
351

79
100
158
320

Guatemala
1986-89

No Education
Primary
Secondary
University

92
192
354
762

134
246
444
1,096

48
100
184
397

54
100'
180
446

180
269
307
647
1,667

n.a.
263
363
700
1,853

59
88
100
211
543

n.a.
72
100
193
510

Honduras
1986-89

No Education
Lessthan Primary
Primary
Secondary
University

Continued
-

- 16Table4 cont'd.
Country
(Early-Late)

EducationalLevel

Panama
1979-89

No Education
Primary
Secondary
University

Paraguay
1983-90

Less than Primary*


Primary
Secondary
University

Peru
1985-90

Earnings (local curr.)


Early
Late

Index
Early

---Late

115
164
279
592

167
180
335
750

70
100
170
361

93
100
186
417

26,290
30,064
55,837
112,866

145,371
177,895
282,777
599,067

87
100
186
375

82
100
159
337

No Education
Primary
Secondary
University

2,661
7,493
10,432
27,463

6,593
7,431
9,014
22,778

36
100
139
367

89
100
121307

Uruguay
1981-89

No Education
Primary
Secondary
University

2,132
3,646
5,278
8,157

68,495
132,583
171,160
263,405

58
100
145
224

52
100
129
199

Venezuela
1981-89

No Education
Less than Primary
Primary
Secondary
University

n.a.
1,940
2,321
3,367
6,138

3,778
4,869
5,983
8,013
13,802

n.a.
84
100
145
264

63
81
100
134
231

Source:Annex3.
Notes: n.a. = not available.
* Due to the sample size, individualswith no educationor less-than-primaryeducationare
grouped into less-than-primaryeducation.

17-

Figurie2. Time Trend of Earnings Differentialsby Level of Education In Four Countries

OLug

fmMmP
a imiverity
400,

a Sftm

o No

*t1a
Sw

a LrlvmsIty

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~400

200.

200

jjo

-j0

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0

0
lgho

Yh

19gh

Cduobb4It"

NomE*gatla

YW

V-u=t,

a S,ec

OLm ThenPtiwy

IN49

9Sm1cn'y

0 UseoIYUdvet
I00~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0

400Soo

200

200,

1
_

Wb

_
010

*,

0toh

jg

- 18 -

Table S. Over Time Educational Attainment of the Labor Force


Attainment(X)
Country
(Early-Late)

EducationalLevel

Argentina
1980-89

No Education
Less than Primary
Primary
Secondary
University

Bolivia
1986-89

No Education
Primary
Secondary
University

Index

Early

Late

Early

Late

n.a.
19.9
36.1
11.6
3.7

1.4
13.6
321
14.0
6.8

n.a.
55
100
32
10

4
42
100
44
21

4.9
4.7
8.9

2.1
5.4
17.9
10.5

104
100
577
189

39
100
331
194

27.1

Brazil
1979-89

No Education
Primary
Secondary
University

19.2
9.5
9.4
4.1

22.7
7.7
12.4
6.3

202
100
99
43

295
100
161
82

Colombia
1980-89

No Education
Primary
Secondary
University

4.2
20.9
10.2
5.6

2.4
19.3
19.5
9.2

20
100
49
27

12
100
101
48

Costa Rica
1981-89

No Education
Primary
Secondary
University

6.0
32.4
9.9
3.7

5.5
34.7
12.2
5.0

19
100
31
11

16
100
35
14

Guatemala
1986-89

No Education
Primary
Secondary
University

30.3
15.6
7.9
2.0

31.0
15.5
6.1
2.4

194
100
51
13

200'
100
39
15

Honduras
1986-89

No Education
Less than Primary
Primary
Secondary
University

11.9
26.4
22.9
19.1
4.8

n.a.
41.1
28.1
14.8
4.1

52
115
100
83
21

n.a.
146
100
53
15

Continued

19-

Table5 cont'd.
Attainment(%)
Country

Educational Level

(Early-Late)

Index

Early

Late

Early

Late

Panama
1979-89

No Education
Primary
Secondary
University

4.0
28.1
18.4
5.8

3.4
25.2
21.1
9.2

14
100
65
21

13
100
84
37

Paraguay
1983-90

Less than Primary*


Primary
Secondary
University

23.9
27.9
14.9
5.9

15.0
25.3
23.5
6.4

86
100
53
21

59
100
93
25

Peru
1985-90

No Education
Primary
Secondary
University

11.1
17.1
32.4
5.6

19.4
20.2
36.2
10.0

65
100
189
33

96
100
179
50

Uruguay
1981-89

No Education
Primary
Secondary
University

1.6
30.2
4.7
8.3

0.9
51.6
13.0
5.7

5
100
16
27

2
100
25
11

Venezuela
1981-89

No Education
Less than Primary
Primary
Secondary
University

n.a.
22.0
32.8
9.2
4.1

2.8
8.8
25.6
10.0
13.1

n.a.
67
100
28
13

11
34
100
39
51

Notes: n.a. = not available.


* Due to the sample size, individualswith no educationor less-dhan-primary
educationare
grouped into less-than-primaryeducation.

-20C. Overtime Returns to Education


Among the eighteenLatin Americacountries, eight countrydata sets allow us to examine
the change in returns to education over the past decade and of comparing the results shown in
Table 6 to those in Table 1. There exists a slight declining trend in the returns to education,
while the ten year difference in the returns to education in Argentina and Panama is only
marginal. (See also Psacharopoulos(1987), Psacharopoulosand Velez (1988) and Riveros
(1990), on the experiencesof other countries).

The behavior of rates of return to schooling by gender over time demonstrates an


interestingpattern (Table 7). In the earlier period females did not have such a clear advantage
over men in the returns they realized on their schoolinginvestment;while in the early eighties,
only three out of the eight countriesshow that the average rate of return to males is greater than
their female counterparts.

- 21-

Table 6. Mean Earnings, Years of Schoolng and Mincerian Returns to Education:


Entire Sample, chrca 1980
Country

Year

Earnings
local curr.)

Years of
Schooling

Rate of
Return (m)

Argentina

1980

735,000

7.9

9.3

Brazil

1979

10,244

5.3

11.4

Colombia

1980

8,401

6.9

18.6

Costa Rica

1981

1,925

6.7

16.8

Panama

1979

231

8.5

13.0

Paraguay

1983

42,203

8.2

11.6

Uruguay

1981

4,375

8.5

10.3

Venezuela

1981

2,619

7.3

11.8

Source:Annex3.

-22-

:ble7. Mean Earings, Yem of Schoolingand Mincerian Returns to Education:


by Gender, circa 1980
Country

Year

Earnings(ocal curr.)
Males

Argentina

1980

Brazil

1979

10,943

Colombia

1980

CostaRica

Females

Males

Females

Rateof Return(%)
Males

Females

8.1

7.8

8.0

9.8

6,813

5.2

5.5

11.8

8.9

10,124

5,626

7.0

6.8

18.6

17.3

1981

1,539

3,334

5.9

9.5

14.8

10.4

Panama

1979

193

281

7.3

10.0

13.4

10.5

Paraguay

1983

51,043

28,678

8.4

7.7

10.5

11.7

Uruguay

1981

4,549

4,318

9.9

8.0

7.3

10.5

Venezuela

1981

2,545

2,799

6.7

8.7

12.1

10.9

Source:Annex3.

1,234Q9O0 333,000

Yearsof Schooling

23 -

Unlikepreviousresearchi',the resultsof the presentstudy for the time trend in rate of


return to educationby genderis mixed. Althoughthe overallaverageschoolingfor both males
and femalesincreasedover time, the figurespresentedin Table 7 stronglysupportan obvious
decliningtrend in the averagerate of return for males,but not in the case of females. In five
out of the eightcountriesstudied,an increaseovertimein averageyearsof schoolingof females
is associatedwitha higherrate of return. Thisinterestingresultimpliesthat the "race"between
technologyand educationis morerelevantin the case of malesthan their femalecounterparts.

Therelativelyhighereducationalattainmentof publicemployeeshasnot changedduring


the past decade(Table 8). The behaviorof the averagerate of return, however,has changed
during the 1980s. In early 1980s, the averagerates of return for the public employeesin
Argentina,CostaRica, Panama,Uruguayand Venezuelawere higherthanthose of individuals
whoworkedin the privatesector. Towardstheend of thedecade,theoppositeis observed.This
may be due to the economiccrisis and fiscalconstraintsduringthe period.

g/ SeePsacharopoulos
(1987),Psacharopoulos
andSteier(1988),andRiveros(1990).

-24

Table S. Mean Earnings, Years of Schooling and Mincerlan Returns to Education:


by Sector of Employment, circa 1980
Country

Year

Earnings (local curr.)

Years of Schooling

Rate of Return (%)

Private

Public

Private

Private

Public

Public

Argentina

1980

657,000

1,319,000

7.7

9.5

6.3

9.7

Colombia

1980

10,374

3,442

7.7

5.0

16.7

14.0

Costa Rica

1981

1,990

1,744

6.3

7.7

15.6

20.6

Panama

1979

250

198

7.8

9.6

12.3

15.7

Paraguay

1983

40,880

51,151

7.6

11.9

12.0

9.2

Uruguay

1981

5,331

2,748

8.3

8.7

9.1

11.9

Venezuela

1981

2,895

1,898

7.1

7.8

11.2

14.0

Source:Annex3.

- 25 -

D. Extended Earnings Functions


Table 9 reports the results of fitting the extended earnings functions in order to
disaggregatethe retums to educationby level of schooling. As shown in this table, all countries
except Chile, Costa Rica, Panama, Paraguay and Peru are found to have the highest rate of
return in primary education comparedto other educationallevels. This result is consistentwith
studiesby Psacharopoulos(1972, 1981, 1985a, 1988). Consequently,primary educationremains
the most profitable investmentin human capital, at least from the individualpoint of view.

26 -

Table 9. Mean Earings and Mincerlan Retums to Educatlon: by Level of Education


Country

Year

EarningsOocalcurr.)
NoEd.

Primary Secondary/
Gen-Voc

Argentina

1989

2,724

4,843

Bolivia

1989

268

281

Brazil

1989

5,257

Chile

1989

Colombia

Rateof Retum(%)
Univ.

Primary

Secondary/
Gen-Voc

Univ.

7,757
7,321"
7,915F
363
351w
398W

13,231

17.90

11.32
12.30(
10.98W

15.40

795

19.40

7.60
6.63W
10.43#

17.40

7,145

8,772

17,658

49.55

16.40

25.75

21,253

28,451

150,269

16.65

24,004

36,769

145,487

28.35

9.45
9.43w
13.08Wf
12.22

16.70

1989

48,309
48,165"
77,109k'
57,529

CostaRica

1989

10,389

13,222

20,956
20,89(0
21,365k

42,323

17.05

11.44
11.78W
12.25'

17.60

Dom.Rep.

1989

376

506

1,677

24.50

1987

12,931

18,725

64,584

27.25

10.78
10.83W
10.28W
11.37

13.98

Ecuador

668
669"
656k
30,101

El Salvador

1990

495

741

1,180

2,458

23.75

11.35

Guatemala
Honduras

1989
1989

134
263

246
363

444
700
693",
1,091W

1,096
1,853

46.55
23.30L'

15.02
19.94
19.80W
28.10Y

Jamaica

1989

301

4,285

6,604

7,473

23.45

38.27

Mexico

1984

18,613

54,558

100,393
173,304
101,402W
93,182k'

51.85

12.40
12.42"
12.33kv

12.95

Panama

1989

167

180

11.80

14.25
15.02w
9.86w

18.12

335
342"
274W

750

19.92

11.40
8.93
18.38
19.90

9.68

Continued-

27 Table9 cont'd.

Country

Year

Earnings (local curr.)

Rate of Retun (%)

No Ed.

Primary

Secondary/
Gen-Voc

Univ.

Primary

Secondary/
Gen-Voc

Univ

10.801'

11.82

13.77

Paraguay

1990

145,371

177,895

282,777

599,067

Peru

1990

6,593

7,431

9,014
9,013"
9,036

22,778

9.90

4.14
4.04p
6.362'

13.28

Uruguay

1989

68,495

132,583

171,160
263,405
173,317WV
168,486'

30.55

8.98
8.151'
10.15k

14.05

Venezuela

1989

3,778

5,983

17.55

9.66
8.9421
13.10(

8.12

8,013
7,672W
9,994'

13,802

Source: Annex4.
Notes: ' The rate of retum is with respectto less-than-primary
education.
Earningsfor individuals
of secondarygeneraleducation.
E
Eamingsfor individualsof secondaryvocationaleducation.
Rate of returnto secondary generl educationwith respectto pinmy education.
Rateof returnto secondaryvocationaleducationwith respectto primaryeducation.
SJ

J'

- 28 On the other hand, only three of the countriesdemonstrate a declining trend of rates of
return by level of education (El Salvador, Honduras and Venezuela). The "law of diminishing
returns" in investmentin human capital in Latin America is found wamting.

E. Secondary General versus Vocational Education


Ten of the data sets distinguish the type of secondaryeducation attended. It has been
argued that secondaryvocationaleducationprovides individualswith potentiallya better match
between skills acquired in school and the world of work. Previous studies have shown that
empirical evidenceon this issue is ambiguous5'.

We use both the earnings function and elaborate methods to estimate rates of return to
secondarygeneral or secondaryvocational education with respect to primary education. For
both methods, the results are very similar. Six out of the eleven countries show that the rate
of return to secondaryvocational education is higher than that of secondary general education
(Tables9 and 10). Moreover, in seven out of eleven countries, the private return to secondary
general education does not differ from that of secondary vocational education&'.The results
suggest that individualswho graduated from a vocationaltrack of the secondarylevel generally
have a relatively higher rate of return to their investmentin education.

S/ See Bellewand Moock(1990),Psacharopoulos


(1985a,1985b,1987),Psacharopoulos
and Velez
(1992),andVelezandPsacharopoulos
(1987).
f/ Ratesof returnto vocationaland generalsecondarygraduatesdo not differin DominicanRepublic
and Mexico.

-29 -

F. Private Returns to Education


We now use the full discounting method described earlier to compute more accurate
returns to education for each level and type of schooling. As shown in Table 10, among the
eighteencountries, in only about half of them does primary educationremain the mostprofitable
investmentby the end of the 1980s. The numberof countrieswhose rate of return to secondary
education with respect to primary education is the lowest is eight when the elaborate method is
adopted. This provides stronger evidence that higher education is worthwhileto attain from an
individualpoint of view. While El Salvador, Jamaica, Paraguay and Venezuelademonstrate a
declining trend of rates of return by educationallevel, rates of return at each successivelevel
increases the higher the level of education in Argentina, Chile and Honduras.

- 30 -

Table 10. Private Returns to Education by Level of Education: FuU Method (percent)
Country

Year

Primary

Secondary
All

General

University

Vocational

Argentina

1989

10.14

14.16

15.69

13.42

14.92

Bolivia

1989

9.84

8.12

7.08

8.51

16.42

Brazil

1989

36.61

5.13

n.a.

n.a.

28.17

Chile

1989

9.7

12.91

12.91

8.59

20.69

Colombia

1989

27.69

14.66

n.a.

n.a.

21.66

CostaRica
DominicanRep.

1989
1989

12.18
85.11

17.60
15.11

16.72
14.98

17.08

12.93

negative

19.43

Ecuador

1987

17.09

17.16

n.a.

n.a.

12.67

El Salvador

1990

18.90

14.51

n.a.

n.a.

9.50

Guatemala

1989

33.75

17.85

n.a.

n.a.

22.22

Honduras

1989

20.84"

23.29

22.08

26.78

25.94

Jamaica

1989

20.44

15.65

n.a.

n.a.

Mexico

1984

21.57

15.13

15.05

15.77

21.74

Panama

1989

5.71

21.03

21.02

32.55

20.99

Paraguay

1990

23.741'

14.64

n.a.

n.a.

13.73

Peru

1990

13.22

6.26

6.18

negative

39.65

Uruguay

1989

27.80

10.31

10.09

10.29

12.80

Venezuela

1989

36.32

14.58

14.13

15.38

10.96

n.a. = notavailable
Notes: 1'Therate of returnis with respectto less-than-primary
education.

n.a.

- 31 G. SocialReturns to Education
In order to provide insight on the issues of resource allocationamong different levels of
education we present the social rates of return by educationallevel. Given the availability of
information on unit costs of different levels of schooling, as shown in Table 11, we calculate
the social rates of return to education for fourteenLatin Americancountries using the elaborate
method discussedearlier.

From Table 12, it is obvious that social rates of return are lower than the private rates
of return presentedin Table 10 for the correspondingcountries. This is consistentwith previous
findings.Y In addition, in ten out of the fourteen countries the social rates of return to
investmentin primary educationis the highest. This result is consistentwith studiesby Fiszbein
and Psacharopoulos (1991), Gomez-Castellanosand Psacharopoulos (1990), Kugler and
Psacharopoulos(1989), Psacharopoulosand Velez (1992), and Riveros (1990). It also suggests
that investment in primary education is still the number one priority for most of the Latin
American countries.

With the lowest social rate of return to secondaryeducation,countries such as Argentina,


Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay may have reached the equilibrium at this
particular level of education. As seen from the estimatesof social returns to both primary and
university education for these six countries, with the exception of Argentina, it is profitable to

7/ SeeGomez-Castellanos
andPsacharopoulos
(1990),Fiszbeinand Psacharopoulos
(1991),Kuglerand
Psacharopoulos
(1989),Psacharopoulos
(1981, 1985a, 1988),Psacharopoulos
and Velez (1992),and
Riveros(1990).

- 32 -

devote resourcesnot only to primaryeducation,but also to higher education. Results for


Argentina,Brazil,Chile Honduras,Mexicoand Uruguayindicatethat on efficiencygrounds,
investmentsin higherand primaryeducationare bothprofitableand thatexpansionof secondary
educationis an alternativefor Chile,CostaRicaand Honduras.

- 33 -

Table11.SocialDirectUnit Cost per Year by Levelof Education


Education
Level

Country/Year
Argentina
1989

Primary
Secondary

$US
142
310

Unit Cost/Year
LocalCurr. Index
18,759
41,157

100
219

- General
- Vocational

Bolivia
1990

577

76,603

408

Primary
Secondary

72
101

228
320

100
140

- General

Brazil
1989

Chile
1989

Primary
Secondary
- General

Statisticson the University

504
243

1598
689

701
100

434
3,174
5,911

1,231
8,996
16,752

179
1,306
2,431

System,"1992. Exchangerate
3.17.
Reportsfrom HumanResources
OperationsDivision,Country
DepartmentI, LatinAmerica
and CaribbeanRegionOffice,
WorldBank.Y1

48,280a
46,201'

100
96

Inflatedfrom 1987figu'res,
WorldBankestimatesby

169
192

45,090
51,200

McMeekin.

University

93
106

1,006

268,829

557

Primary
Secondary

80
191

44,080
95,860

100
217

Vocational

- General

- Vocational
University
CostaRica
1989

BoliviaCentralBank,Memoria
1990. UDAPE,"Basic

181
173

Colombia
1990

Inflatedfrom 1985figures.
Kuglerand Psacharopoulos
(1989).

University

- Vocational
University
Primary
Secondary
- General
- Vocational
Uk.versity

Source

Primary
Secondary
- General
- Vocational
University

Fundacionpara la Educacion
Superiory Desarrollo,
communicationto the World

Bank,August11, 1992.
1013

509,020

1155

144

11,750

100

222
423
1,541

18,133
34,476
125,614

154
293
1,069

Inflatedfrom 1986figuresin
1978constantprices. Cota
RicaPublicSectorExpenditure
Review,ReportNo. 7877-CR,
Latin Americaand the
CanbbeanRegionalOffice,The
WorldBank(1989).
Continued-

34 -

Table 11 cont'd.

UnitCost/Year

Education
Country/Year
Ecuador
1987

El Salvador
1990

Source
Index

Level

$US

Local Curr.

Primary
Secondary
- General
- Vocational

97
218

16,500
37,200

100
225

University

652

111,200

674

Primary
Secondary
- General

63
66

502
533

100
106

University

227

1,852

364

Primary
Secondary
- General
- Vocational
University

115
185

229
369

100
161

1,233

2,465

1,076

127
323

729
1,854

100
254

6,452

37,062

5,084

Gomez-Castellanosand
Psacharopoulos(1990).

FundacidnMiguelKast(1990).

- Vocational

Honduras
1989

Jamaica
1989

Primary
Secondary
- General
- Vocational
University

Deflatedfrom 1990figures.
HondurasSocialSector
Programsby W. McGreevey,
The World Bank, 1990.

Inflatedfrom 1987figures.y
Access.fralityand Efficiencyin
CaribbeanEducation:A
RegionalStudy. Populationand
HumanResourcesDivision,
CountryDept. Ell,Latin
Americanand Caribbean
RegionalOffice,The World
Bank, 1992.
Continued
-

35 Table11 cont'd.

Educational
Level

UnitCost/Year
USS
LocalCurr.

Index

135
589

22,663
98,846t

100
436

University

1,035

173,658

766

Primary
Secondary

50
144

61,623
176,259

100
286

710
256

872,685
154,900

1,416
100
119

Country/Year
Mexico
1984

Primary
Secondary

Source
Basedon SEP (1985),p.8.

- General

- Vocational

Paraguay
1990

- General
- Vocational

Uruguay
1989

University
Primary
Secondary
- General

306

185,100

450

272,200

176

University

614

371,500

240

Primary
Secondary
- General

198
347
315

7,668
13,420
12,170

100
175
159

471

18,198

237

1,625

62,795

819

Venezuela
1989

Vocational

- Vocational

University

PublicEx=
1ditue ReviewsThe
SocialS n, ReportNo.
10193-PA,The World Bank,
1992.
Psacharopoulos
and VElez
(1992).

Fiszbeinand Psacharopoulos
(1991).

Source:Annex1.
Notes: Y Primary educationunit cost comes from Public Sendina on SocialProsram=,whilesecondary educadon unit
costs come from SecondaryEducationand Trainina in Bmzil: Adaotin to New Economic Realiis. llhzr
Educaion Reform in Brazil provides the unit cost of higher education.Informationfor both pnmary and
secondary educationhas to be inflated to 1989 current prices.
Unit cost for nine years of primary education.
I Weightedaverage of academicand vocational tracks (4.5: I ratio, respectivelyfrom Unesco, Statisti

Xmuboic,1990)for 3 yearsof secondaryeducation.


FUnit cost refers to upper secondaryeducation.

- 36 -

TIble 12. Social Returns to Education by Level of Education: Full Method (percent)
Country

Year

Secondary

Primary
All

General

University
Vocational

Argentina

1989

8.44

7.06

n.a.

n.a.

7.55

Bolivia

1989

9.31

7.31

n.a.

n.a.

13.13

Brazil

1989

35.55

5.08"'

n.a.

n.a.

21.44

Chile

1989

8.05

11.10

11.13

7.23

13.96

Colombia

1989

20.04

11.36

n.a.

n.a.

14.03

Costa Rica

1989

11.16

14.43W

13.74

11.86

9.03

Ecuador

1987

14.71

12.73

n.a.

n.a.

9.87

El Salvador

1990

16.38

13.33

n.a.

n.a.

8.00

Honduras

1989

18.181

19.72

n.a.

n.a.

18.93

Jamaica

1989

17.73

7.92

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

Mexico

1984

19.04

9.57

n.a.

n.a.

12.91

Paraguay

1990

20.30-'

12.74

n.a.

n.a.

10.84

Uruguay

1989

21.61

8.05"'

8.16

7.08

10.29

Venezuela

1989

23.41

10.18

9.99

10.42

6.16

n.a. = not available.


Notes: LI Same cost as secondarygeneral education.
1' The rate of return is with respectto less-than-primaryeducation.

- 37 -

As suggested by Psacharopoulos(1988), results of vocationalizationmay not always


match expectations. The estimates of social rates of return to general versus vocational
secondaryeducation shown in Table 12 demonstratemixed results. Given the limitationof the
data and the limited availabilityof unit cost estimates, the present study is not able to provide
any conclusiveargument on this issue.

By comparing the private and social rates of return by level of education,one can address
the extent of public subsidizationof education. Table 13 presents the index of subsidizationof
educationby level, showing that in nearly all countriesuniversity educationis the most heavily
subsidizedlevel of schooling. This finding points to the regressive allocationof public finds -a finding common in the world today.

IV. Conclusion

In this paper we have adopteda macro, although consistent, approachto study earnings
differentials by level of education in 18 Latin American countries and used altemative
methodologiesto assess the private and social retums to investmentin each level of education.
The results document that primary educationis still the numberone investmentpriority in most
countries, and that the earnings premium of higher education graduateshas declined during the
eighties. Given the macro nature of our findings, these shouldbe used only as a starting point
for more detailed within-countrywork in order to assess education investmentpriorities in the
respectivecountry.

38-

Table 13. Index of Pubic Subsidization of Education by Level (percent)


Country

Year

Primary

Secondary

Higher

Argentina

1989

17

50

49

Bolivia

1989

10

20

Brazil

1989

30

Chile

1989

17

14

33

Colombia

1989

28

22

35

CostaRica

1989

18

30

Ecuador

1989

14

26

22

El Salvador

1989

13

16

Honduras

1989

13

17

27

Jamaica

1989

13

49

n.a.

Mexico

1989

12

37

41

Paraguay

1989

14

13

21

Uruguay

1989

22

22

20

Venezuela

1989

36

30

44

Source: Based on Tables 10 and 12.


- not available.
Note: The subsidizationindex is definedas the percent by whichthe private
rate of return exceeds the social rate.

n.a.

39 -

REFEENCES

Bellew, Rosemary and Peter Moock. 1990. "Vocational and Technical Education in Peru."
Economicsof EducationReview9(4):365-75.
Bourgouignon, F. 1980. "The Role of Education in the Urban Labour Market During the
Process of Development:The Case of Colombia." Paper presented at the VI World
Congress of the InternationalEconomicAssociation,Mexico, August 1980.
Gomez-Castellanos, Luisa and George Psacharopoulos. 1990. "Earnings and Education in
Ecuador: Evidence from the 1987 HouseholdSurvey." Economicsof EducationReiew
9(3):219-27.
Kugler, Bernardoand George Psacharopoulos.1989. "Earningsand Educationin Argentina: An
analysis of the 1985 BuenosAires HouseholdSurvey.' Economicsof Education
8(4):353-65.
Mincer, J. 1974. Schooling. Experienceand Earnings. New York: Columbia UniversityPress.
Fiszbein, Ariel and George Psacharopoulos. 1991. "A Cost Benefit Analysis of Educational
Investmentin Venezuela, 1989." Views from LATHR, Latin Americaand the Caribbean
Technical Department, The World Bank.
Psacharopoulos, George. 1972. "Rates of Return to Investment in Education Around the
World." ComparativeEducationReview 16(1):54-67.
Psacharopoulos,George and R. Layard, 1979. "HumanCapital and Earnings: British Evidence
and a Critique, "The Reviewof EconomicStudies, Vol. LVI, No. 3, July 1979; 485503.

Psacharopoulos,George. 1981. "Returnsto Education: An UpdatedInternationalComparison."


ComparativeEducationReview 17(3):321-41.
Psacharopoulos,George. 1983. "Educationand Private versus Public Sector Pay." IAour and
SggipU 8(2):123-34.

Psacharopoulos, George. 1985a. "Returns to Education: A Further International Update and


Implications." The Journal of Human Resources 20(4):583-604.
Psacharopoulos,George. 1985b. "An Evaluationof CurriculumDiversificationin Colombiaand
Tanzania." ComparativeEducationReview29(4):507-25.

- 40 Psacharopoulos, George. 1987. "Earnings and Education in Brazil: Evidence from the 1980
Census." Educationand Training Department,Research Division, The World Bank.
Psacharopoulos, George. 1988. "Educationand Development:A Review." The World Bank
Research Observer 3(l):99-116.
Psacharopoulos, George. 1989. "Time Trends of the Returns to Education: Cross-National
Evidence." Economicsof EducationReview 8(3):225-31.
Psacharopoulos, George and Francis Steier. 1988. "Education and the Labor Market in
Venezuela, 1975-84." Economicsof EducationReview 7(3):321-32.
Psacha,opoulos, George, Ana-Maria Arriagada and Eduardo Velez. 1992. "Earnings and
Education among Self-EmployedMales in Colombia." Bulletin of Latin American
Research2(l):69-89.
Psacharopoulos,George and Zafiris Tzannatos. 1992a.Women's Employmentand Pay in Latin
America: Overviewand Methodology.Washington,DC: The World Bank.
Psacharopoulos, George and Zafiris Tzannatos, eds. 1992b. Case Studies on Women's
Employmentand Pay in Latin America. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Psacharopoulos, George and Eduardo Velez. 1992. "Education and the Labor Market in
Uruguay." Views from LATHR, I-atin America and the Caribbean Technical
Department, The World Bank.
Riveros, Luis A. 1990. "The EconomicReturn to Schoolingin Chile. An Analysis of its LongTerm Fluctuations."Economicsof EducationReview 9(2):111-21.
*

Schultz, T. W. 1961. "Investmentin Human Capital." American EconomicReview. March.


Tinbergen,Jan. 1975. Income Distribution:Analysisand Policies. Amsterdam:North-Holland.
Velez, Eduardo and George Psacharopoulos. 1987. "The External Efficiency of Diversified
SecondarySchools in Colombia." Economicsof EducationReview 6(2):99-110.

- 41 -

ANNEx1. SURVEYDATADuscrinoN
Country/Date

Survey Name

ExecutingAgenoy

Geographical
Coverage

Argentina
October 1980

Encuesta Permanente
de Hogares(EPH)

Instituto Nacionaldo
Estadisticay Censos

MetropolitanAra

3,400

Argentina
May 1989

EncuestaPermanent.
do Hogares (EPH)

Intituto Nacionalde
Estadisticay Censos

Metropotitan
Area

16,759

Bolivia
1986

EncuestsPermanent.
de Hogare (EPH)

Instituto Nacionalde
Estadistica(INS)

La Paz, Coohabamba,
Cruro, y Santa Cruz

12,226

Bolivia
November 1989

Encuesta Integrada
de Hogarp (EIH)

Instituto Nacional de
Estadistica(INE)

17 urban centers with


10,000 or mor
inhabitants

37,864

8razil
November 1979

Pesquisa Nacionalpor
Amostrade Domicilios
(PNAD)

Fundacao Istituto Brashiro


de Geografiay Estadistica

Naional

88,975

Brazil
Fourth quarter 1989

Pesquisa Nacional por


Amostrade Domicilios
(PNAD)

Fundacao Instituto Bnuieiro


de Geografia y Eatadistics

National

70,777

Chile
Fourth quarter 1989

Encuesta Nacionaldel
Empleo (PIDEH)

Instituto Nacionalde
Estadisticay Censos

National

32,456

Colombia
September 1980

Encuesta Nacional de
Hogares - Fuerza de
Trabajo (ENH)

Departamento
Administraivo Nacional
de Estadstica

Barranquilla,Bogota,
Bucaramanga,Call,
Manizales, Medellin y
pato

7,473

Colombia
September 1989

Encuesta Nacional de
Hogares - Fuerza de
Trabajo (ENH)

Deparumento
Administraivo Nacional
de Estadistica

Barranquilla,Bogota,
Bucaramanga,Ca}i,
Catagena, Manizales,
Medetlin y Pasto

17,949

Costa Rica
July 1981

EncuestaNacional de
Hogars- Empleoy
Desempleo (ENH)

Direccion General de
Estadisticay Censos

National

6,604

Costa Rica
July 1989

Encueta de Hogares
de Propositos
Muldples(EHPM)

Direecion General de
Estadisdca y Censos

National

7,637

Dom. Republic
March 1989

Encuesta de Gasto
Social de las Familias

Banco Central de la
Republica Dominicas

National

799

Ecuador
November 1987

Encuesta Peiodica
sobro Empleoy
Desempleo

Instituto Nacional
do Empleo

Nadonal

5,558

Number of
Households

Continued

-42ANNX

continued Goographical
Coverage

Numberof
Houscholds

Country/Date

SurveyName

Execouting
Agency

El Salvador
October1990

Encuestade Hogamos
de Proposizos
Multiples(EHPM)

Ministeriodo Planificacion
y Coordinacion
del
DesarroloEoonomico
y Social

Urban

Guatemala
Oct 1986-Aug1987

EncuestaNacional
Soci-Detmografica
(ENSD)

InstitutoNacionalde
Estadistica

National

9,660

Guatemala
Apr 4-July24, 1989

EncuestaNacional
Socio-Demografica
(ENSD)

InstitutoNacionaldo
Estadistica

National

10,934

Honduras
September1986

EncuestaContinua
SobreFucrza
do Trbajo (ECSFT)

DireccionGeneraldo
Estadsticay Censos

16 majorcities

8,650

Honduras
September1989

Encues Pormanente
do
Hogaresdo Propositos
Multipls (EPHPM)

DireccionGeneralde
Estadisticay Ccnsos

National

8,648

Jamaica
July 1989

JamlaicaSurveyof
LivingConditions

Statistidcal
htitute
of Jamaica

National

2,725

Mexico
Thirdquartwr1984

EncuestaNacionaldo
Ingreso- Gastode
los Hogarps(ENIGH)

Diroccionde Estadistica
de CortoPlaza

National

4,708

Panama
Sep 19-Oct28. 1979

Encuetado Hogares,
Manode Obra(EMO)

Direcocion
de EstAdistica
y Conso

National

8,593

P4nama
August1989

Encuestade Hogares,
Manode Obra(EMO)

Diroocionde Estadistica
y Censos

National

8,817

Parguay
June-August1983

Encuestado Hogaes,
Manode Obra(EMO)

Direcion Generalde
Estadistica
y Coms

Metropolitan
Area

1,002

Paraguay
June-August1990

Encuestad Hoepros,
ManedoObra (EMO)

DireccionGeneraldo
Estadisticay Censos

Metopoltan Ar

1,000

Peru
July 1985-July1986

PeruLSMS

InstitutoNacionalde
Estica
Informatica

National

4,981

Peru
June-July1990

Peru LSMS

InsdtutoCuanto

Lima

1,385

Uruguay
Secondhalf 1981

Encuest Nacionalde
Hogas (ENH)

DireccionGenerald
Estadisticay Caaos

Urban

9,506

23,773

Continued

-43

continued

Geogrphial
Covegp

Numberof
Households

Country/Date,

SurveyName

ExecudngAgoney

Uruguay
Secondhalf 1989

EncuestaNacionalde
Hogarm(NH)

DireccionGoneralde
Estadisticay Consos

Urban

21,473

Venezuela
Secondhalf 1981

Encuosta
do Hogares
por Muesta (EHM)

OficinaCentrl do
Estadisdcae Informatica

National

4S,421

Venezuela
Secondhalf 1989

Encuasado Hogares
por Muestra(EHM)

OficinaCental do
Estadisticae Informatica

Nadonal

61,385

- 44

ANNEX2. VARLABLE
DEFINIONS

All country data sets refer to individuals age 15 to 65, inclusive. Observations with
missing values for education variables have been dropped from the analysis. All individuals
have positive earnings from employment.
1. Education
The education variables are of two types. One is continuous in terms of years of
schooling (S). The other is a series of educationaldummy variables:
NOSCHOOL No education.
PRIMDROP

Primary education incomplete.

PRIM

Primary education completed.

SECDROP

Secondaryeducation, either general or vocational, incomplete

SECGEN

Secondarygeneral education completed. In cases where information on


the general/vocationalsplit of secondary education is not available, this
variable refers to both types of the curriculum.

SECVOC

Secondaryvocationaleducation completed.

SECTEAC

Teachers' college graduate.

NOUNI

Higher non-university education such as post-secondary education or


technicalinstitute.

UNIVDROP

Universityeducation incomplete.

UNIV

Universityeducation completed.

In the case of the Paraguay data sets (1983 and 1990), the sample size of those with noeducation (NOSCHOOL)is very small and hence we grouped this category with the less-thanprimary category ,PRIMDROP). In Peru's 1985and 1990 data sets, the two education groups
are defined in a different way:
NOSCHOOL No education or primary education incomplete.
PRIM

Primary education completedor secondaryeducation incomplete.

- 45 -

2. Eamings
The earningsvariableusedin the study is the sum of monthlywage earningsand selfemploymentincomein the primaryjob in localcurrencywitha fewexceptions.In the 1990El
Salvadordata, bonusearningsare included. Quarterlywageincomeis usedfor Mexicowhile
incomefrom the mainjob for the last weekis usedin the Peru 1985data set.
3. Hours Worked
Accordingto the over table informationin the countrydata sets, thereare three different
time periodsto whichthe hours workedvariablerefers to -- daily, weeklyor yearly. In the
1984Mexicodata set, the hoursworkedinformationis not available.
Daily
Daily hoursworkedin
primaryjob

Bolivia
Jamaica

1989
1989

Weekly

Total hours workedper week

Argentina 1980, 1989


Panama
1979
Venezuela 1981

Weeklyhoursworkedin
primaryjob

Bolivia
Brazil
CostaRica
Guatemala
Honduras
Panama
Paraguay
Uruguay

Total hoursworkedlast week

Dominican 1989
Republic
Ecuador
1987
El Salvador 1990
Peru
1990

1986
1979, 1989
1981, 1989
1986, 1989
1986
i989
1983, 1990
1981, 1989

Normalhoursworkedper week Chile


Colombia
Honduras
Venezuela

1989
1980, 1989
1989
1989

Yearly
Yearlyhoursworked

1985

Peru

-46-

4. Sectorof Employment
Most of the countrydata sets, exceptdata for the DominicanRepublic(1989),provide
informationon the sector of employmentfor each individual. Each samplewas split into
"public"and "private"sub-samplesusingthe followingrule:
PUBLIC

Publicsectoremployees.

PRIVATE Privatesectoremployees,self-employed
individuals,employersand family
workers.
Of course we had to adapt the above general rule dependingon the availabilityof
informationin the respectivecountrysurveys:
Argentina 1980, 1989
PUBLIC
Industryof naturalgas and petroleum,manufacturingindustryrelated to
petroleumand minerals,electricity,gas and water supplyindustry,water
and aerialtransportationindustry,communication
industry,socialservices,
publicand defenseadministration,and drainageservices.
PRIVATE Manufacturing
industrynot relatedto petroleumrefining,rubber, mineral,
machineryand equipments,constructionindustry,commercialand services
industries,groundtransporationindustry,financeand real estate,cleaning
and laundryservices.
Bolivia 1986, 1989

PUBLIC

Publicadministrationand publicemployeesor mixed.

PRIVATE Employeesof privatesectorand cooperative.


Brazil 1989
PUBLIC

Socialservicesand publicadministration.

PRIVATE Self-employed.
Mexico1984
PUBLIC

Industriesof oil, electricityand naturalgas, publicadministration,


education
and research.

PRIVATE Industriesof foodprocessing,textile,furniture,printing,chemicalindustry,


mineral, metal and machineryindustry, manufacturingand construction
industries,wholesalesandretail,hotelindustry,transportation
industry,real
estateand services.

- 47 -

Peru 1985
PUBLIC
PRIVATE

Wage earners.
Self-employed.

-48ANNE[Xa BASICEARNINGsFUNCIONS

Argentina 1980

Gender

Sector

Variable

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling(S)

0.093

0.080

0.098

0.078

0.097

Experience (EX)

0.030

0.087

0.017

0.026

0.050

-0.0004

-0.0004

-0.0002

-0.0004

-0.0007

Log Hours (H) Worked

2.278

1.584

2.228

0.642

0.614

Constant Term

-3.191

-0.942

-3.096

3.231

3.056

R2

0.66

0.45

0.65

0.06

0.19w

6,156

2,745

3,411

2,030

-737

Earnings (Y)

735

1,234

333

1,207

1,309

7.9

8.1

7.8

7.9

9.5

EX

22

21

23

22

.21

31

43

22

47

40

3.621

2.554

2.673

1.543

1.024

Experience-squared(EX2 )

Means|

Var (Ln Y)

Source: EncuestaPermanentede Hogares (EPH), CEPAL

Notes: The earningsvariable(Y) is in thousandsof pesosper month.


H is the weeklyhoursworked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% levelor better.

-49 ANNEx3. BASICEARNINGsFUNeCoNs


Argentina 1989

Sector

Gender
Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling(S)

0.103

0.107

0.112

0.010

0.089

Experience (EX)

0.045

0.052

0.039

0.046

0.048

-0.0006

-0.0007

-0.0006

-0.0007

-0.0007

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.613

0.355

0.590

0.38t

0.647

ConstantTerm

4.856

5.843

4.719

5.767

4.847

R2

0.35

0.32

0.40

0.26

0.35

4,760

2,965

1,795

2,463

1,097

7,456

8,563

5,629

7,413

8,463.

9.1

8.7

9.8

8.7

11.0

EX

22

23

21

22

21

42

46

36

45

39

0.656

0.546

0.696

0.557

0.610

Variable

Experience-squared(EX2)

Mens
Earnings (Y)

Var (Ln Y)

Source:EncuestaPermanentede Hogares(EPH),CEPAL.
Notes: The earningsvariable(Y) is in australesper month.
H is the weeklyhoursworked.
Allcoefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% levelor better.

-50 FuNcrIoNs
ANIx 3L BASc EARNINGS
BoUvia 1989

Sector

Gender
Variable

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling(S)

0.071

0.073

0.077

0.087

0.06i

Experience (EX)

0.040

0.046

0.028

0.053

0.032

-0.0005

-0.0006

-0.0004

-0.0007

-0.0003

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.514

0.301

0.594

0.234

0.726

Constant Term

3.278

3.726

2.994

3.656

2.919

R2

0.17

0.18

0.18

0.19

0.19

5,356

3,823

1,533

2,989

2,367

Earnings (Y)

364

402

270

361

369

10.1

9.5

11.5

8.7

11.7

EX

18

19

16

17

20

8.2

8.7

7.1

8.7

7.6

0.645

0.659

0.539

0.697

0.573

Experience-squared(EX2 )

Mans

Var (Ln Y)

Source: EncuestaIntegradade Hogares (EIH), CEPAL.

Notes: The earningsvariable(Y) is in bolivianosper month.


H is the dailyhoursworked.
Allcoefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% levelor better.

-51

ANNEx3.L BASC EARNIGS FuNCIONS


Brazil 1979

Sector

Gender
Variable

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling(S)

0.114

0.118

0.089

n.a.

n.a.

Experience (EX)

0.071

OD70

0.053

n.a.

n.a.

Experience-squared(EX2)

-0.0011

-0.0011

-0.0009

n.a.

n.a.

Log Hours (H) Worked

-0.174

-0.270

-0.301

n.a.

n.a.

Constant Term

8.066

8.510

8.605

n.a.

n.a.

R2

0.34

0.37

0.28

n.a.

n.a.

6,655

5,529

1,126

n.a.

n.a.

10,244

10,943

6,813

n.a.

n.a.

5.3

5.2

5.5

n.a.

n.a.

EX

21

21

18

n.a.

n.a.

52

53

47

n.a.

n.a.

0.651

0.632

0.578

n.a.

n.a.

Means
Earnings (Y)

Var (Ln Y)

Source:PesquisaNacionalpor Amostrade Domicillos.


Notes: The earningsvariable(Y)is in cruzeirosper month.
H is the weeklyhoursworked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% levelor better.
n.a. = Not available.

-52 -

ANEX 3

BASICEARNIGS FUNWCIONS

Brazil 1989

Gender

Sector

Variable

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling (S)

0.147

0.154

0.142

0.150

0.114

Experience (EX)

0.064

0.073

0.051

0.038

0.054

-0.0009

-0.0010

-0.0008

-0.0005

-0.0008

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.724

0.310

0.595

0.936

0.829

Constant Term

1.954

3.567

2.314

1.454

1.915

R2

0.29

0.30

0.29

0.26

0.26

108,527

69,773

38,754

24,690

17,428

6,969

7,151

6,640

9,979

7,746

5.3

5.0

5.9

4.1

8.2

EX

21

22

20

28

20

43

46

39

43

36

1.631

1.474

1.680

2.051

1.608

Experience-squared (EX2 )

MeanS

Earnings (Y)

Var (Ln Y)

Source: PesquisaNacionalpor Amostrade Domicillos, CEPAL.


Notes: The earnings variable (Y) is in nuevos cruzadosper month.
H is the weeklyhours worked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% level or better.

-53 -

ANNx 3. BASICEARNNGSFUNCTIONS
ChIle 1989

Sector

Gender
Variable

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling (S)

0.120

0.121

0.132

0.114

0.112

Experience (EX)

0.042

0.048

0.029

0.041

0.029

-0.0004

-0.0005

-0.0002

-0.0004

-0.0002

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.885

0.768

0.753

0.918

0.660

Constant Term

5.189

5.652

5.487

5.104

6.418

R2

0.40

0.39

0.45

0.37

0.29

37,679

26,823

10,856

33,794

3,885

40,275

43,878

31,373

38,232

58,044

8.5

8.2

9.4

8.1

12.3

EX

21

22

20

22

20

47

48

44

48

43

0.638

0.591

0.692

0.629

0.423

Experience-squared

(EX 2 )

Means
Earnings (Y)

Var (Ln Y)

Source: ProgramaIntegradode Encuestasde Hogares (PIDEH)


Encuesta Nacionaldel Empleo, IV Trimestre,1989
Notes: The earningsvariable (Y) is in pesos per month.
H is the weeklyhours worked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% level or better.

-54
AN

3. BASICEARNNGSFUNCTONS

Colombia 1980

Sector

Gender
Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling(S)

0.186

0.186

0.173

0.167

0.140

Experience (EX)

0.066

0.081

0.042

0.060

0.060

-0.0008

-0.0010

-0.0005

-0.0008

-0.0009

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.584

0.395

0.577

0.690

0.434

Constant Term

4.020

4.668

4.299

4.000

4.665

1R2

0.34

0.33

0.35

0.35

0.10

11,373

7,017

4,356

8,136

3,237

8,401

10,124

5,626

10,374

3,442

6.9

7.0

6.8

7.7

5.0

EX

20

21

18

21

17

48

50

46

47

51

1.479

1.610

1.169

1.295

1.225

Variable

Experience-squared (EX2 )

N
Means
Eamings (Y)

Var (Ln Y)

Source: EncuestaNacionalde Hogares, CEPAL.

Notes: The eamingsvariable(Y) is in pesosper month.


H is the weeklyhoursworked.
Allcoefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% levelor better.

-55

ANwx 3.1 BAsic EARNiNGSFuCTIONS


Colombia 1989

Gender

Sector

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling(S)

0.140

0.145

0.129

0.137

0.119

Experience(EX)

0.047

0.059

0.035

0.046

0.035

-0.0005

-0.0006

-0.0004

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.645

0.428

0.719

0.664

0.326

ConstantTerm

6.190

6.897

6.108

6.140

7.980

R2

0.33

0.32

0.36

0.30

0.38

27,021

16,272

10,749

23,974

3,047

53,643

60,592

43,124

50,279

80,116

8.2

8.1

8.3

7.8

11.2

EX

20

21

18

19

20

48

50

46

48

45

0.947

1.010

0.815

0.956

0.458

Variable

Experience-squared(EX2)

-. OOOS -0.0003

MM
Earnings (Y)

Var (Ln Y)

Source: EncuestaNacionalde Hogares, CEPAL.


Notes: The earningsvariable (Y) is in pesos per month.
H is the weeklyhours worked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% level or better.

56 -

ANNEX
I BASICEARNINGSFUNCIONS
Costa Rica 1981

Gender

Sector

Variable

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling(S)

0.168

0.156

0.206

0.148

0.104

Experience (EX)

0.095

0.101

0.083

0.099

0.039

-0.0011

-0.0012

-0.0011

-0.0012

-0.0005

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.698

0.695

0.598

0.699

0.584

Constant Term

2.164

2.236

2.257

2.148

4.260

R2

0.44

0.44

0.51

0.38

0.37

8,220

6,033

2,187

6,454

1,766

1,925

1,990

1,744

1,539

3,334

6.7

6.3

7.7

5.9

9.5

EX

20

21

17

20

19

46

47

43

46

45

1.100

1.055

1.195

1.057

0.362

Experience-squared(EX2 )

Means
Earnings (Y)

Var (Ln Y)

Source:EncuestaNacionalde Hogares(ENA),Empleoy Desempleo.CEPAL.


Notes: The earningsvariable(Y) is in colonesper month.
H is the weeklyhoursworked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% level or better.

-57 ANNEX3 BAC EARNNGSFUNCTONS


Costa Rica 1989

Gender

Sector

Variable

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling(S)

0.109

0.105

0.135

0.093

0.085

Experience (EX)

0.039

0.042

0.033

0.035

0.030

-0.0005

-0.0005

-0.0004

-0.0004

-0.0003

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.745

0.620

0.725

0.747

0.393

Constant Term

5.345

5.896

5.064

5.443

7.248

R2

0.41

0.35

0.54

0.36

0.33

8,882

6,400

2,482

7,305

1,577

16,346

17,283

13,928

14,245

26,079

6.9

6.4

8.1

6.2

10.1

EX

21

22

18

21

19

45

47

41

45

45

0.692

0.576

0.922

0.677

0.268

Experience-squared(EX2)

Means
Earnings (Y)

Var (Ln Y)

Source: EncuestaNacionalde Hogares (ENH)Empleoy Desempleo, CEPAL.

Notes: The earningsvariable(Y) is in colonesper month.


H is the weeklyhoursworked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% levelor better.

-58

ANEX 3. BASICEARNIGS FUNCTIONS


Dominican Republic 1989

Gender
Variable

Sector

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling(S)

0.094

0.078

0.120

n.a.

n.a.

Experience (EX)

0.045

0.055

0 032

n.a.

n.a.

-0.0005

-0.0008

-0.0004

n.a.

n.a.

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.338

0.331

0.261

n.a.

n.a.

Constant Term

3.578

3.801

3.558

n.a.

n.a.

R2

0.30

0.30

0.39

n.a.

n.a.

736

436

300

n.a.

n.a.

Earnings (Y)

652

722

552

n.a.

n.a.

8.8

8.4

9.5

n.a.

n.a.

EX

17

19

15

n.a.

n.a.

46

47

45

n.a.

n.a.

0.573

0.479

0.659

n.a.

n.a.

Experience-squared(EX2 )

Var (Ln Y)

Source:EncuestaNacionalde GastoSocial de las Famiias.


Notes: The earningsvariable(Y)is in sucresper month.
H is the weeklyhoursworked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% levelor better.
n.a. - Not Available.

- 59 -

3. BASICEARNINGSFuNcToNS

Ecuador 1987

Gender

Sector

Variable

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling(S)

0.108

0.098

0.115

0.113

0.071

Experience (EX)

0.048

0.054

0.037

0.051

0.030

-0.0007

-0.0008

-0.0005

-0.0007

-0.0004

Log Hours (H; Worked

0.376

0.273

0.305

0.391

0.206

Constant Term

6.864

7.434

6.938

6.730

8.234

R2

0.39

0.40

0.40

0.37

0.33

8,941

5,604

3,337

7,364

1,577

27,313

32,049

19,360

26,254

32,258

9.6

9.7

9.5

8.9

12.8

EX

19

19

18

20

18,

43

45

40

43

40

0.634

0.531

0.646

0.679

0.242

Experience-squared(EX2 )

Means

Eamings (Y)

Var (Ln Y)

Source: EncuestaPeriodica Sobre Empleoy Desempleo en el Area Urbanadel Ecuador.

Notes: Quito,Cuenca,and Guayaquilonly.


The earningsvariable(Y) is in sucresper month.
H is the weeklyhoursworked.
Allcoefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% levelor better.

- 60 ANNEx3. BASICEARNiNGS
FuNCTIoNs
El Salvador 1990

Gender
Variable

Sector

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling(S)

0.097

0.096

0.098

0.094

0.062

Experience (EX)

0.037

0.041

0.034

0.038

0.015

-0.0005

-0.0005

-0.0004

-0.0005

-0.0007*

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.556

0.499

0.561

0.595

0.319

ConstantTerm

3.239

3.513

3.132

3.083

4.887

R2

0.33

0.32

0.35

0.30

0.29

6,903

4,094

2,809

5,785

1,009

Earnings (Y)

899

989

766

835

1,215

6.9

7.0

6.7

6.1

10.9

EX

22

22

23

23

20

47

47

46

48

41

0.656

0.619

0.669

0.677

0.224

Experience-squared(EX2)

Means

Var (Ln Y)

Source: Encuestade Hogares de PropositosMultiples.

Notes: The earningsvariable(Y) is in colonesper month.


H is the weeldyhours worked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% level or better, except those with a *.

-61

ANNEx3. BASIC EARNINGSFUNCTIONS


Guatemala 1989

Gender

Sector

Variable

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling (S)

0.149

0.142

0.163

0.141

0.087

Experience (EX)

0.043

0.044

0.041

0.041

0.025

-0.0006

-0.0006

-0.0006

-0.0006

-0.0002

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.514

0.313

0.467

0.556

0.153

Constant Term

1.822

2.698

1.750

1.692

4.252

R2

0.35

0.29

0.50

0.29

0.39

11,708

8,476

3,232

10,554

1,154

Earnings (Y)

242

256

207

219

455

4.3

4.0

4.8

3.7

9.1

EX

23

24

21

24

20

47

48

43

47

42

1.044

0.996

1.103

1.002

0.304

Experience-squared (EX2 )

Means

Var (Ln Y)

Source:Encuesta NacionalSocto-Demografica(ENSO), CEPAL.


Notes: The earningsvariable (Y) is in quetzalesper month.
H is the weeklyhours worked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% level or better.

-62 -

A,rx

3.

BASICEARNINGSFUNCTIONS

Honduras 1989

Gender
Variable

Sector

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling(S)

0.176

0.172

0.198

0.174

0.123

Experience (EX)

0.054

0.058

0.049

0.055

0.035

-0.0006

-0.0007

-0.0006

-0.0007

-0.0004

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.474

0.260

0.475

0.505

0.185

Constant Term

1.913

2.856

1.548

1.763

3.956

R2

0.43

0.42

0.51

0.37

0.49

9,945

6,575

3,370

8,442

1,503

Eanings (Y)

453

488

384

406

714

6.5

6.1

7.1

5.9

9.9

EX

20

20

18

20

19

47

48

46

48

43

0.990

0.937

1.042

0.964

0.428

Experience-squared(EX 2 )

Means

Var (Ln Y)

Source:EncuestaPenranentede Hogaresde PropositosMultiples(EPHPM),CEPAL.


Notes: The earningsvariable(Y) is in lempirasper month.
H is the weeklyhoursworked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% levelor better.

-63ANNEx 3. BAsc EARNIGS FUNCTIoNs

Jamaica 1989

Sector

Gender
Variable

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling(S)

0.288

0.280

0.317

0.249

0.160

Experience (EX)

0.052

0.083

0.039

0.041

0.018*

-0.0008

-0.0011

-0.0007

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.834

0.135*

0.781

0.767

1.834

ConstantTerm

1.638

2.760

1.445

1.980

2.432

R2

0.21

0.22

0.28

0.15

0.18

2,127

1,172

955

1,768

359

5,886

9,829

1,047

6,443

3,140

7.2

7.0

7.4

6.9

8.5

EX

20

19

20

19

21

5.4

5.5

5.2

5.4

5.3

1.940

1.982

1.761

1.628

1.690

Experience-squared(EX 2 )

-0.0005 -0.0004*|

Means
Earnings (Y)

Var (Ln Y)

Source:1989JamaicaLaborForceSurvey,secondround.
Notes: The earningsvariable(Y) is in Jamaicadollarsper year.
H is the dailyhoursworked.
Allcoefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% levelor better,exceptthosewitha

'.

-64 ANNEx 3. BASIcEARNIGS FUNCTIONS

Mexico 1984

Gender

Sector

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling(S)

0.141

0.141

0.150

0.154

0.080

Experience (EX)

0.079

0.084

0.065

0.086

0.051

-0.0010

-0.0010

-0.0010

-0.0010

-0.0007

Constant Term

9.132

9.110

9.101

8.959

10.077

R2

0.29

0.31

0.29

0.26

0.22

4,684

3,425

1,259

3,671

1,013

81,029

84,520

71,533

73,448

108,503

6.6

6.3

7.5

5.7

9.7

EX

20

21

17

20

18

0.978

0.920

1.117

1.042

0.446

Variable

Experience-squared(EX2)

Means
Earnings (Y)

Var (Ln Y)

Source:EncuestaNacionalde Ingreso-Gasto
de los Hogares.
Notes: The earningsvariable(Y)is in pesosfor the 3rd quarter.
H is the not availablehoursworked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% levelor better.

- 65 -

ANNEx3. BASIc EARNNGSFuNCTIoNs


Panama 1979

Sector

Gender
Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling(S)

0.130

0.123

0.157

0.134

0.105

Experience (EX)

0.050

0.047

0.052

0.059

0.031

-0.0006

-0.0006

-0.0007

-0.0008

-0.0003

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.423

0.646

0.058*

0.525

0.419

ConstantTerm

1.847

1.248

2.721

1.286

2.430

R2

0.45

0.49

0.56

0.42

0.40

7,673

4,844

2,829

4,412

3,261

Earnings (Y)

231

250

198

193

281

8.5

7.8

9.6

7.3

10.0

EX

19

20

16

19

19

43

43

42

45

40

0.539

0.469

0.616

0.572

0.355

Variable

Experience-squared(EX2)

Means

Var (Ln Y)

Source:Encuestade Hogares- Mamode Obra(EMO),CEPAL.


Notes: The earningsvariable(Y) is in balboasper month.
H is the weeklyhoursworked.
Allcoefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% levelor better,exceptthosewith a

-66 ANNEX3L BASICEARNNGSFUNCTIoNS

Panama 1989

Gender
Variable

Sector

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling(S)

0.137

0.126

0.171

0.122

0.110

Experience (EX)

0.063

0.066

0.061

0.060

0.036

-0.0008

-0.0008

-0.0007

-0.0008

-0.0004

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.749

0.701

0.684

0.750

0.591

Constant Term

0.442

0.800

0. 148*

0.504

1.891

R2

0.51

0.48

0.61

0.44

0.46

8,616

5,436

3,180

6,041

2,575

Eamings (Y)

292

312

258

232

434

9.2

8.6

10.1

8.2

11.5

EX

20

21

19

20

20

42

43

40

42

40

0.935

0.817

1.098

0.935

0.388

Experience-squared(EX2)

Means

Var (Ln Y)

Source:EncuestaHogares-Mano
de Obra(EMO),CEPAL.
Notes: The earningsvariable(Y) is in balboasper month.
H is the weeklyhoursworked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% levelor better,exceptthosewitha *.

- 67 -

ANNEX3. BASICEARNIGS FUNCTIONS

Paraguay 1983

Gender
Variable

Sector

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling (S)

0.116

0.105

0.117

0.120

0.09

Experience (EX)

0.047

0.052

0.032

0.049

0.040

-0.0006

-0.0008

-0.0004

-0.0007

-0.0006

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.326

0.275

0.345

0.324

0.346

Constant Term

7.561

8.007

7.336

7.515

7.859

R2

0.36

0.37

0.35

0.34

0.40

1,723

1,042

681

1,501

222

42,203

51,043

28,678

40,880

51,151

8.2

8.4

7.7

7.6

11.9

EX

19

19

18

19

17

49

48

49

50

39

0.642

0.543

0.585

0.661

0.415

Experience-squared (EX2 )

Means
Earnings (Y)

Var (Ln Y)

Source: Encuesta de Hogares (Mano de Obra).

Notes: The earningsvariable (Y) is in guaranies per month.


H is the weekly hours worked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% level or better.

-68 ANNEX3L BASICEARNINGSFUNCTIONS


Paraguay 1990

Gender
Variable

Sector

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling (S)

0.115

0.103

0.121

0.119

0.083

Experience (EX)

0.049

0.058

0.036

0.052

0.031

-0.0006

-0.0009

-0.0003

-0.0007

-0.0004

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.401

0.319

0.370

0.399

0.504

Constant Term

8.873

9.467

8.763

8.808

9.117

R2

0.38

0.43

0.37

0.38

0.43

1,825

1,084

741

1,599

226

239,861

290,496

165,787

236,360

264,629

9.1

9.1

8.9

8.6

12.6

EX

19

20

18

20

16

49

50

48

51

38

0.624

0.514

0.590

0.651

0.362

Experience-squared (EX2 )

Means
Earnings (Y)

Var (Ln Y)

Source: Encuestade Hogares (Manode Obra).


Notes: The earningsvariable (Y) is in guaraniesper month.
H is the weekly hours worked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% level or better.

-69 ANNEX3. BAsC EARNmIGSFuNCTIONS

Peru 1985

Gender
Variable

Sector

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling(S)

0.182

0.173

0.189

0.203

0.135

Experience (EX)

0.058

0.057

0.060

0.068

0.058

Experience-squared(EX 2 )

-0.0007

-0.0007

-0.0008

-0.0008

-0.0007

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.896

0.892

0.860

0.781

1.013

Constant Term

-0.373

-0.176

-0.335

-0.080

-0.618

R2

0.54

0.51

0.53

0.40

0.73

6,393

4,165

2,228

3,201

3,192

9,278

11,142

5,794

7,349

11,212

6.7

7.1

6.1

5.1

8.4

EX

24

24

24

29

19

1,854

792

1,564

1,914

1,793

Var (Ln Y)

2.689

2.468

2.755

2.829

2.271

Men
Earnings (Y)

Source:1985 Peru Survey of Living Conditions.


Notes: The earnings variable (Y) is in intis per year.
H is the yearly hours worked.

All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% levelor better.

-70AM=

3. BAsIc EARNINGsFUNCIIONS

Peru 1990

Gender
Variable

Sector

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Publiq

Years of Schooling(S)

0.081

0.085

0.065

0.090

0.090

Experience (EX)

0.053

0.053

0.053

0.058

0.036

-0.0007

-0.0007

-0.0008

-0.0008

-0.0005

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.519

0.355

0.473

0.491

0.766

ConstantTerm

6.060

6.467

6.176

6.002

5.489

R2

0.18

0.18

0.13

0.19

0.23

2,476

1,621

855

2,063

413

9,912

11,482

6,937

10,295

8,002

10.1

10.2

9.8

9.6

12.5

EX

19

19

18

19

18

8.0

8.5

7.1

8.0

7.9

0.859

0.778

0.878

0.908

0.613

Experience-squared(EX2)

Means
Earnings (Y)
S

Var (Ln Y)

Source:1990PeruSurveyof LivingConditions,Lima.
Notes: The earningsvariable(Y) is in thousandsof intisper month.
H is the dailyhoursworked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% levelor better.

-71 Nmx 3. BASIc EARNIGS FuNCnIONS

Uruguay 1981

Gender
Variable

Sector

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling(S)

0.103

0.091

0.119

0.073

0.105

Experience (EX)

0.051

0.061

0.038

0.045

0.051

-0.0007

-0.0009

-0.0005

-0.0006

-0.0007

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.724

0.449

0.571

0.334

0.79Z

Constant Term

3.753

4.994

4.015

5.701

3.439

R2

0.34

0.31

0.37

0.29

0.35

10,587

6,666

3,921

2,599

7,988

4,375

5,331

2,748

4,549

4,318

8.5

8.3

8.7

9.9

8.0

EX

23

24

22

21

24

46

50

38

44

46

0.771

0.582

0.764

0.318

0.893

Experience-squared(EX2 )

Means
Eamings (Y)

Var (Ln Y)

Source:EncuestaNaclonalde Hogares(ENH),CEPAL.
Notes: The eanmings
variable(Y) is in pesosper month.
H is the weeklyhoursworked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% levelor better.

- 72 -

ANNx 3. BASICEARNNGSFuNCIONS
Uruguay 1989

Gender
Variable

Sector

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling(S)

0.097

0.090

0.106

0.105

0.057

Experience (EX)

0.044

0.051

0.042

0.045

0.030

-0.0005

-0.0007

-0.0006

-0.0006

-0.0003

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.828

0.596

0.708

0.860

0.447

Constant Term

6.998

8.029

7.164

6.779

9.051

R2

0.40

0.35

0.42

0.41

0.28

10,981

6,567

4,414

8,434

2,547

145,840

178,086

97,865

146,073

145,069

9.0

8.7

9.3

8.6

10.2

EX

24

24

22

24

24

44

49

37

47

42

0.743

0.545

0.774

0.885

0.205

Experience-squared(EX2)

MeansI

Earnings (Y)

Var (Ln Y)

Source:EncuestaContinuade Hogares,CEPAL.
Notes: The earningsvariable(Y) is in pesosper month.
H is the weeklyhoursworked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% levelor better.

-73 ANNX 3

BASC EARNINGS
FuNCTIoNs

Venezuela 1981

Gender
Variable

Entire

Sector

Males

Females

Private

Publiq

Sample
Years of Schooling(S)

0.118

0.112

0.140

0.121

0.109

Experience (EX)

0.054

0.060

0.042

0.063

0.032

-0.0007

-0.0008

-0.0005

-0.0008

-0.0004

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.655

0.496

0.382

0.685

0.519

Constant Term

3.614

4.305

4.314

3.382

4.467

R2

0.37

0.40

0.40

0.36

0.40

57,112

41,303

15,809

40,629

16,483

2,619

2,895

1,898

2,545

2,799

7.3

7.1

7.8

6.7

8.7

EX

21

22

19

21

21

43

45

40

44

42

0.445

0.391

0.446

0.500

0.284

Experience-squared(EX2 )

Means
Earnings (Y)

Var (Ln Y)

Source: Encuestade Hogarespor Muestra, CEPAL.

Notes: The earningsvariable(Y) is in bolfvaresper month.


H is the weeklyhoursworked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% levelor better.

- 74.

ANNX3 BASICEARNINGS
FUNCTIONS
Venezuela 1989

Gender

Sector

Variable

Entire
Sample

Males

Females

Private

Public

Years of Schooling(S)

0.084

0.084

0.080

0.097

0.066

Experience (EX)

0.022

0.031

0.019

0.027

0.017

-0.0002

-0.0003

-0.0003

-0.0002

-0.0002

Log Hours (H) Worked

0.669

0.330

0.671

0.738

0.577

Constant Term

5.103

6.311

5.153

4.626

5.746

R2

0.37

0.27

0.50

0.37

0.35

2,902

1,340

1,562

1,228

1,674

6,894

7,858

6,067

6,700

7,037

9.1

7.9

10.2

7.3

10.5

EX

22

25

21

23

22

41

46

35

46

37

0.305

0.315

0.281

0.468

0.167

Experience-squared(EX2)

Means
Earnings (Y)

Var (Ln Y)

Source:Encuestade Hogarespor Muestra,CEPAL.


Notes: The earningsvariable (Y) is in bolfvaresper month.
H is the weeklyhours worked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% level or better.

- 75 -

ANNEx4. ExTENDEDEARNINGSFuNcTIONs
Argentina 1989

Sample

Variable

Gender
Males

No schooling
Prim. dropout
Sec. dropout
Sec. general
Sec. vocational
Teacher training
Univ. dropout
Tertiary non-univ.
University
Experience
Exp-squared
Log hours worked
Constant
R2

Mean

-0.358
-0.204
0.197
0.615
0.549
0.430
0.891
0.694
1.182
0.046
-0.0007
0.617
5.532
0.37
4,760

Females

Sector
Private

Public

-0.351
-0.216
0.179
0.621
0.537
0.679
0.833
0.807
1.248
0.052
-0.0008
0.370
6.524
0.34
2,965

-0.341
-0.122
0.276
0.717
0.688
0.705
1.041
0.863
1.265
0.041
-0.0006
0.592
5.394
0.42
1,795

-0.302 -0.035*
-0.205 -0.182
0.122*
0.195
0.453
0.567
0.535
0.414
0.303
0.533
0.714
0.856
0.628
0.602
0.949
1.255
0.052
0.045
-0.0007 -0.0008
0.626
0.409
5.501
6.363
0.37.
0.29
1,097
2,463

8,563
4.5
14.0
35.8
21.3
3.3
9.7
0.2
7.0
1.8
5.4
23
46
0.546

5,629
1.3
13.0
25.9
17.7
4.1
11.6
2.8
7.1
7.5
9.0
21
36
0.696

7,413
1.2
14.0
35.6
21.8
4.1
10.0
0.4
6.5
1.9
4.5
22
45
0.557

M-M~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Y (Local Curr.)
No schooling (%)
Prim. dropout (%)
Primary (%)
Sec. dropout (%)
Sec. general (%)
Sec. vocational (%)
Teacher training (%)
Univ. dropout (%)
Tertiary non-univ. (%)
University (%)
Experience (Years)
Hours worked (Hours)
VAR (Ln Y)

7,456
1.4
13.6
32.1
20.0
3.6
10.4
1.2
7.1
3.9
6.8
22
42
0.656

Source:

EncuestaPermanentede Hogares(EPH),CEPAL.

Notes:

The earnings variable (Y) is in australes per month.


H is the weekly hours worked.
* Not statisticallysignificantat the 5% level.

8,463
1.2
7.5
19.2
17.5
2.9
11.9
4.0
9.3
10.9
15.5
21
39
0.610

- 76 ANEX 4. EXTEDED EARNNGSFuNCToNs

Bolivia 1989

Variable

Sample

No schooling
Prim. dropout
Sec. dropout
Sec. general
Sec. vocational
Teacher training
Univ. dropout
University
Experience
Exp-squared
Log hours worked
Constant
R2
N

-0.388
-0.128
0.147
0.265
0.417
0.139*
0.299
1.000
0.041
-0.0005
0.421
4.001
0.21
5,356

Gender

Sector

Males

Females

Private

Public

-0.259
-0.099*
0.147
0.289
0.516
0.192*
0.309
1.055
0.044
-0.0006
0.254
4.372
0.22
3,823

-0.452
-0.306
0.070*
0.200
0.419
0.149*
0.358
0.832
0.034
-0.0005
0.505
3.800
0.20
1,533

-0.458
-0.147
0.118
0.294
0.492
0.342*
0.487
1.109
0.049
-0.0007
0.237
4.337
0.20
2,989

-0.079*
-0.098*
0.212
0.249
0.346
0.120*
0.279
0.967
0.037
-0.0004
0.561
3.710
0.26
2,367

M-aa
Y (Local Curr.)
No schooling (%)
Prim. dropout (%)
Primary (%)
Sec. dropout(%)
Sec. general (%)
Sec. vocational (%)
Teacher training (%)
Univ. dropout (%)
University (%)
Experience (Years)
Hours worked (Hours)
VAR (Ln Y)
Source:
Notes:

364
2.1
26.9
5.4
16.4
13.3
4.5
0.5
20.3
10.5
18
8.2
0.645

402
1.9
31.7
6.1
18.6
13.5
3.0
0.4
14.3
10.5
19
8.7
0.659

270
2.5
14.9
3.8
11.0
12.9
8.3
0.8
35.2
10.6
16
7.1
0.539

EncuestaIntegrada de Hogares (EIH), CEPTAL


The earnings variable (Y) is in bolivianosper month.
H is the daily hours worked.
* Not statisticallysignificantat the 5% level.

361
3.0
35.3
0.7
19.7
13.5
4.2
0.3
10.4
6.5
17
8.7
0.697

369
0.9
16.3
3.4
12.3
13.1
4.9
0.8
32.7
15.5
20
7.6
0.573

- 77 ANNEX4. EXTEDED EARNNGSFuNcTIoNs

Brazil 1989

No Schooling
Prim. dropout
Sec. dropout
Sec. general
Univ. diopout
Univ. dropout
Experience
Exp-squared
Log hours worked
Constant
R2

Sector

Gender

Sample

Variable

Males

Females

Private

Public

-0.911
-0.577
0.205
0.492
1.136
1.522
0.064
-0.0010
0.768
2.903
0.29
108,527

-1.022
-0.580
0.189
0.544
1.153
1.516
0.070
-0.0010
0.366
4.554
0.30
69,773

-0.718
-0.602
0.209
0.540
1.199
1.561
0.054
-0.0009
0.631
3.165
0.31
38,754

-1.117
-0.589
0.131
0.433
0.963
1.516
0.035
-0.0005
0.944
2.658
0.25
24,690

-0.280
-0.506
0.128
0.372
1.001
1.424
0.055
-0.0008
0.927
2.268
0.33
17,428

6,969
22.7
46.0
7.7
3.2
12.4
1.7
6.3
21
43
1.631

7,151
22.9
49.2
7.8
3.3
10.1
1.4
5.3
22
46
1.474

6,640
22.3
40.2
7.5
3.1
16.5
2.3
8.1
20
39
1.680

9,979
25.6
55.0
6.5
2.5
6.7
0.7.
2.9.
28
43
2.051

7,746
15.8
24.8
7.6
4.0
24.4
4.1
19.3
20
36
1.608

Mean
Y (Local Curr.)
No Schooling(%)
Prim. dropout
Primary (%)
Sec. dropout (%)
Sec. general (%)
Univ. dropout
University (%)
Experience
Hours Worked
VAR (Ln Y)
Source:
Notes:

Pesquisa Nacionalpor Amostra de Domicilios, CEPAL.


The earnings variable (Y) is in nuevos cruzados per month.
H is the weekly hours worked.
All Coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% level.

- 78 ANNEx-4.EXTEDEDEARNINGS
FucnrIoNS
Chile 1989

Variable

Sample

Gender
Males

No schooling
Prim. dropout
Sec. dropout
Sec. general
Sec. vocational
Teacher training
Univ. dropout
University
Experience
Exp-squared
Log hours worked
Constant

Females

Sector
Private

Public

-0.333
-0.171
0.287
0.566
0.785
1.025
1.120
1.736
0.038
-0.0005
0.941
5.847
0.42

-0.350
-0.188
0.280
0.606
0.883
0.915
1.110
1.811
0.044
-0.0006
0.835
6.278
0.42

-0.339
-0.141
0.347
0.611
0.753
1.292
1.263
1.687
0.026
-0.0003
0.805
6.241
0.47

-0.329 -0.084*
-0.164 -0.171
0.267
0.326
0.544
0.469
0.760
0.796
0.801
0.767
1.136
0.799
1.847
1.283
0.037
0.032
-0.0005 -0.0004
0.954
0.706
5.802
7.069
0.40
0.29

37,679

26,823

10,856

33,794

3,885

Mean
Y (Local Curr.)
No schooling (%)
Prim.
dropout (%)
Primary (%)
Sec. dropout(%)
Sec. general (%)
Sec. vocational(%)
Teacher training (%)
Univ. dropout (%)
University (%)
Expe :ence (Years)
Hours worked (Hours)
VAR (Ln Y)

40,275
5.2
23.3
17.3
24.9
19.1
0.1
0.6
5.6
4.3
21
47
0.638

43,878
5.8
25.4
18.4
25.5
17.0
0.1
0.3
4.3
3.8
22
48
0.591

31,373
3.9
18.2
14.6
23.6
24.3
0.1
1.1
9.0
5.6
20
44
0.692

38,232
5.7
25.6
18.5
25.3
18.1
0.1
0.1
4.1
2.9
22
48
0.629

58,044
0.9
3.2
7.4
21.5
27.6
0.1
4.2
19.0
16.6
20
43
0.423

-R2

Source:
Notes:

Programa Integrado de Encuestasde Hogares (PIDEH),


Encuesta Nacionaldel Empleo, IV Trimatre, 1989.
The earnings variable (Y) is in pesos per month.
H is the weekly hours worked.
* Not statistically significantat the 5% level.

- 79 FUNCTIONS
ANNEX4. EXTEDEDEARNNGS
Colombia 1989

Sample

Variable

Sector

Gender
Males

Females

Private

Public

No Schooling
Prim. dropout
Sec. dropout
Sec. general
Univ. dropout
University
Experience
Exp-squared
Log hours worked
Constant
R2
N

-0.567
-0.245
0.291
0.733
1.143
1.729
0.046
-0.0005
0.639
6.981
0.33
27,021

-0.557
-0.247
0.309
0.746
1.146
1.798
0.057
-0.0006
0.430
7.690
0.33
16,272

-0.461
-0.224
0.256
0.720
1.109
1.567
0.037
-0.0005
0.708
6.822
0.36
10,749

-0.565
-0.243
0.271
0.703
1.106
1.736
0.045
-0.0005
0.659
6.915
0.30
23,974

-0.053*
-0.179
0.380
0.595
0.899
1.373
0.035
-0.0004
0.272
8.845
0.38
3,047

Mean
Y (Local Curr.)
No Schooling(%)
Prim. dropout (%)
Primary (%)
Sec. dropout (%)
Sec. general (%)
Univ. dropout (%)
University (%)
Experience (Years)
Hours Worked (Hours)
VAR (Ln Y)

53,643
2.4
14.0
19.3
28.8
19.5
6.8
9.2
20
48
0.947

60,592
2.0
13.9
20.0
30.6
17.9
6.2
9.5
21
50
1.010

43,124
3.0
14.3
18.3
26.1
21.9
7.7
8.7
18
46
0.815

50,279
2.6
15.2
20.7
30.0
18.3
5.9
7.2
19
48
0.956

80,116
0.4
5.1
8.8
19.0
28.5
13.7
24.5
20
45
0.458

Source:
Notes:

Encuesta Nacionalde Hogares, CEPAL.


The earnings variable (Y) is in pesos per month..
H is the weekly hours worked.
* Not statisticallysignificantat the 5% level.

- 80 FUNCrIONS
AtwX 4. EXMiDED EARNINGS

Costa Rica 1989

Sample

Variable

Gender

Sector

Males

Females

Private

Public

-0.341
-0.199
0.283
0.589
0.735
0.872
0.914
1.293
0.040
-0.0005
0.748
5.942
0.41
8,882

-0.220
-0.219
0.285
0.552
0.684
0.850
0.953
1.276
0.040
-0.0006
0.627
6.466
0.35
6,400

-0.468
-0.209
0.330
0.782
0.921
1.036
0.943
1.451
0.036
-0.0005
0.726
5.808
0.54
2,482

-0.309
-0.179
0.266
0.511
C.619
0.730
0.768
1.244
0.036
-0.0005
0.747
5.960
0.36
7,305

-0.067*
-0.037*
0.217
0.402
0.541
0.614
0.658
0.923
0.034
-0.0004
0.402
7.696
0.32
1,577

Y (Local Curr.)
No schooling (%)
Prim. dropout(%)
Primary (%)
Sec. dropout(%)
Sec. general (%)
Sec. vocational (%)
Univ. dropout (%)
Tertiary non-univ. (%)
University (%)
Experience (Years)
Hours worked (Hours)
VAR (Ln Y)

16,346
5.5
22.4
34.7
15.4
10.5
1.7
4.2
0.7
5.0
21
45
0.692

17,283
6.6
25.0
36.0
15.0
8.3
1.5
3.3
0.6
3.8
22
47
0.576

No schooling
Prim. dropout
Sec. dropout
Sec. general
Sec. vocational
Univ. dropout
Tertiary non-univ.
University
Experience
Exp-squared
Log hours worked
Constant
R2

Source:
Notes:

13,928
2.6
15.9
31.5
16.2
16.1
2.2
6.6
0.8
8.1
18
41
0.922

14,245
6.3
25.4
37.9
16.0
8.2
1.3
2.4
0.4
2.1
21
45
0.677

EncuestaNacional de Hogares (ENH)Ernpleoy Desempleo, CEPAL.


The earnings variable (Y) is in colonesper month.
H is the weekly hours worked.
* Not statisticallysignificantat the 5% level.

26,079
1.6
8.7
20.0
12.5
21.0
3.8
12.7
1.8
17.9
19
45
0.268

- 81 ANNEX4. EXrEDED EARNIGS FUNCIONS


DominicanRepublic 1989

Sample

Variable

Gender
Males

No schooling
Prim. dropout
Sec. dropout
Sec. general
Sec. vocational
Univ. dropout
University
Experience
Exp-squared
Log hours worked
Constant

Females

Sector
Private Public

-0.490
-0.171
0.339
0.433
0.411*
0.826
1.131
0.045
-0.0006
0.341
4.193
0.31
736

40.272* -0.913
-0.052* -0.358
0.316
0.415
0.491
0.347
-0.109* 0.655
0.846
0.863
0.955
1.410
0.055
0.030
-0.0008 -0.0003*
0.352
0.250
4.169
4.518
0.31
0.42
436
300

n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

Y (Local Curr.)
No schooling (%)
Prim. dropout (%)
Primary (%)
Sec. dropout (%)
Sec. general (%)
Sec. vocational (%)
Univ. dropout(%)
University (%)
Experience (Years)
Hours worked (Hours)
VAR (Ln Y)

652
5.6
33.6
9.6
15.6
14.7
1.2
12.4
7.1
17
46
0.573

722
6.4
37.2
11.2
14.0
14.7
0.2
8.5
7.6
19
47
0.479

n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

R2

Source:
Notes:

552
4.3
28.3
7.3
18.0
14.7
2.7
18.0
6.3
15
45
0.659

Encuesta Nacionallde Gasto Social de las Famlias.


The earnings variable (Y) is in sucres per monthi.
H is the weekly hours worked.
* Not stadstically significantat the 5% level.

- 82 -

ANNEX
4. EXTEDEDEARNIGSFUNCnONS
Ecuador 1987

Gender

Sample

Variable
No Schooling
Prim.dropout
Sec. dropout
Sec. general
Univ. dropout
University
Experience
Exp-squared
Log hours worked
Constant
R2
N

Sector
Private

Public

Males

Females

-0.545
-0.244
0.295
0.682
0.983
1.366
0.049
-0.0007
0.374
7.508
0.39
8,941

-0.319
-0.129
0.234
0.594
0.875
1.305
0.055
-0.0008
0.269
8.039
0.39
5,604

-0.408
-0.258
0.333
0.889
1.142
1.377
0.039
-0.0005
0.305
7.536
0.40
3,337

-0.532
-0.254
0.298
0.689
0.9J9
1.467
0.052
-0.0007
0.389
7.406
0.36
7,364

-0.485
0.007*
0.160
0.409
0.621
0.885
0.031
-0.0004
0.195
8.711
0.33
1,577

27,313
2.8
8.8
27.9
19.9
17.7
13.5
9.4
19
43
0.634

32,049
1.6
8.0
29.6
22.3
15.1
13.1
10.4
19
45
0.531

19,360
4.7
10.3
25.1
15.9
22.1
14.3
7.7
18
40
0.646

26,254
3.3
10.1
31.2
21.3
16.5
10.9
6.6
19
43
0.679

32,258
0.5
2.9
12.2
13.1
23.5
25.7
22.1
18
40
0.242

Mean
Y (ocal Curr.)
No Schooling(%)
Prim. dropout(%)
Primary(%)
Sec. dropout(%)
Sec. general(%)
Univ. dropout(%)
University(%)
Experience(Years)
HoursWorked(Hours)
VAR (Ln Y)
Source:

Encuesta PeriodicaSobre Enpleo y Desempleoen el Area Urbanadel Ecuador

in Quito, Cuenca,and Guayaquil.


Notes:

(Y) is the earningvariablein sucres per month. (H) is the weekly hours worked.
* Not statisticallysignificantat the 5% level.

- 83 FUNerIONS
ANNX 4. EXMEDEDEARNINGS

El S'lvador 1990

Sample

Variable

Gender

Sector

Males

Females

Private

Public

No schooling
Prim. dropout
Sec. dropout
Sec. general
Univ. dropout
Tertiary non-univ.
University
Experience
Exp-squared
Log hours worked
Constant
R2
N

-0.478
-0.188
0.249
0.685
1.089
0.963
1.478
0.038
-0.0005
0.573
3.711
0.33
6,903

-0.552
-0.194
0.246
0.664
1.040
0.896
1.366
0.041
-0.0006
0.511
4.017
0.32
4,094

-0.293
-0.135
0.232
0.785
1.179
1.130
1.699
0.037
-0.0006
0.588
3.484
0.37
2,809

-0.437 -0.231
-0.162 -0.164
0.202
0.243
0.401
0.677
0.691
1.092
0.593
0.869
0.950
1.609
0.016
0.039
-0.0006 40.0001*
0.341
0.607
5.136
3.545
0.29
0.30
1,009
5,785

men
Y (Local Curr.)
No schooling (%)
Prim. dropout (%)
Primary (%)
Sec. dropout(%)
Sec. general (%)
Univ. dropout (%)
Tertiary non-univ. (%)
University (%)
Experience (Years)
Hours worked (Hours)
VAR (Ln Y)

899
12.6
26.5
16.2
20.5
14.8
3.8
3.6
2.1
22
47
0.656

989
10.1
26.6
17.6
23.7
13.0
4.1
2.2
2.6
22
47
0.619

766
16.2
26.2
14.1
15.9
17.4
3.2
5.7
1.3
23
46
0.569

835
14.4
29.6
17.1
21.4
12.4
2.8
1.1
2.8
23
48
0.667

Source:
Notes:

Encuesta de Hogares de PropositosMuldples


The earnings variable (Y) is in colonesper month.
H is the weekly hours worked.
* Not statisticallysignificantat the 5% level.

1,215
3.0
10.1
11.5
15.0
27.7
8.6
18.6
6.1
20
41
0.224

- 84 -

A X 4. ExTEDED EARNNGSFucnCTONs
Guatemala
1989
Variable

Sample

No Schooling
Prim. dropout
Sec. dropout
Sec. general
Univ. dropout
University
Experience
Exp-squared
Log hours worked
Constant
R2
N

Gender

Sector

Males

Females

Private

-0.931
-0.436
0.382
0.901
1.153
1.636
0.041
-0.0006
0.500
2.805
0.34
11,708

-0.902
-0.424
0.371
0.796
1.059
1.557
0.042
-0.0006
0.302
3.643
0.28
8,476

-0.948
-0.529
0.449
1.107
1.336
1.775
0.041
-0.0006
0.466
2.738
0.50
3,232

-0.864
-0.394
0.345
0.792
1.110
1.694
0.037
-0.0005
0.546
2.616
0.28
10,554

31.0
32.6
15.5
9.9
6.1
2.5
2.4
23
47
1.044

30.4
35.5
16.0
9.2
4.5
2.0
2.4
24
48
0.996

Public
-0.391
-0.173
0.339
0.571
0.702
1.098
0.026
-0.0003
0.138
4.783
0.39
1,154

kqean
No Schooling(%)
Prim. dropout
Primary (%)
Sec. dropout (%)
Sec. general (%)
Univ. dropout
University(%)
Experience
Hours Worked
VAR (Ln Y)
Source:
Notes:

32.4
25.2
14.4
11.8
10.3
3.6
2.3
21
43
1.103

33.7
34.7
15.1
9.1
4.1
1.6
1.6
24
47
1.002

EncuestaNacionalSocio-Demografica(ENSO), CEPAL.
The earnings variable (Y) is in quetzales per month.
H is the weekly hours worked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% level.

6.5
13.5
19.5
17.0
24.4
10.1
9.1
20
42
0.304

85 -

ANEx 4. ExTEDED EARNINGSFuNCTIONS


Honduras1989

Variable

Sample

Prim. dropout
Sec. dropout
Sec, general
Sec. vocational
Univ. dropout
Tertiary non-univ.
University
Experience
Exp-squared
Log hours worked
Constant
R2
N

-0.466
0.412
0.990
1.405
1.357
1.310
1.992
0.054
-0.0007
0.477
2.963
0.42
9,945

Mean
Y (Local Curr.)
No schooling (%)
Prim. dropout (%)
Primary (%)
Sec. dropout (%)
Sec. general (%)
Sec. vocational (%)
Univ. dropout (%)
Tertiary non-univ. (%)
University (%)
Experience (Years)
Hours worked (Hours)
VAR (Ln Y)

453
0.0
41.1
28.1
9.5
14.6
0.3
1.6
0.9
4.1
20
47
0.990

Source:
Notes:

Gender

Sector

Males

Females

-0.525
0.374
0.898
1.200
1.173
1.111
1.879
0.057
-0.0008
0.256
3.951
0.41
6,575

-0.423
0.486
1.231
2.315
1.684
1.659
2.173
0.052
-0.0007
0.491
2.620
0.51
3,370

-0.438 -0.387
0.402
0.172
0.973
0.547
1.449
0.923
1.357
0.817
1.304
0.811
2.102
1.372
0.054
0.035
-0.0007 -0.0004
0.511
0.136
2.790
4.972
0.36
0.51
8,442
1,503

384
0.0
33.5
9.7
28.0
22.4
0.0
1.6
1.2
3.6
18
46
1.042

406
0.0
45.9
29.9
9.3
10.5
0.2
1.1
0.4
2.7
20
48
0.964

488
0.0
44.9
28.1
9.4
10.6
0.4
1.6
0.7
4.3
20
48
0.937

Private

Public

714
0.0
13.8
17.6
10.9
37.6
0.5
4.2
3.5
11.8
19
43
0.428

Encuesta Permanete de Hogares de Propositos Multiples (EPHPM),CEPAL.


The earnings variable (Y) is in lempiras per month.
H is the weekly hours worked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% level.

- 86

AxNNE4. EXTEDEDEARNGS FVNCfONS


Jamaica 1989
Variable

Sample

Gender
Males

Females

R2

-0.469*
-0.093*
1.618
2.296
2.877
0.063
-0.0009
0.985
3.046
0.30

-0.748
-0.254*
1.570
2.050
2.973
0.089
-0.0013
0.286*
4.213
0.28

-0.168*
0.022*
1.785
2.608
2.657
0.058
-0.0010
0.945
2.878
0.42

2,127

1,172

5,886
1.1
6.3
74.7
12.0
5.0
1.0
20
5.4
1.940

9,829
1.3
7.1
77.1
9.0
4.3
1.2
19
5.5
1.982

No Schooling
Prim. dropout
Sec. dropout
Sec. general
University
Experience
Exp-squared
Log hoursworked
Constant

Sector
Private
-0.544
.0.093*
1.288
2.363
3.322
0.055
-0.0008
0.874
3.236
0.22

955

Public
-0.600*
-0.217*
1.009
1.182
1.441
0.018*
-0.0004*
2.000
2.937
0.24

1,768

359

6,443
1.1
6.8
81.2
7.1
3.3
0.6
19
5.4
1.628

3,140
1.1
3.9
42.6
36.2
13.4
3.1
21
5.3
1.690

Mean
Y (LocalCuff)
No Schooling(%)
Prim. dropout(%)
Primary(%)
Sec. dropout(%)
Sec. general(%)
University(%)
Experience(Years)
HoursWorked(Hours)
VAR(Ln Y)
Source:
Notes:

1,047
0.9
5.3
71.6
15.6
5.9
0.7
20
5.2
1.761

1989JamaicaLaborForceSurvey,secondround.
The earningsvariable(Y) is in Jamaicadollarsper year.
H is the dailyhours worked.
* Not statisticallysignificantat the 5% level.

- 87ANxA 4. ExrENDED
EARNNGSFvNcIONS
Mexico1984
Variable

Sample

Gender

'

Sector

Males

Females

Private

Public

-1.037
-0.552
0.345
0.745
0.740
0.890
1.262
0.077
-0.001
10.074
0.29
4,684

-1.069
-0.565
0.291
0.720
0.776
0.839
1.269
0.081
-0.001
10.094
0.32
3,425

-1.049
-0.671
0.485
0.856
0.851
0.982
1.212
0.065
-0.001
10.040
0.30
1,259

-1.027
-0.561
0.391
0.809
0.929
0.934
1.498
0.084
-0.001
9.953
0.26
3,671

-0.393
-0.284
0.073*
0.379
0.306
0.464
0.786
0.048
-0.0007
10.697
0.22
1,013

Y (LocalCurr.)
No schooling(96)
Prim. dropout(%)
Primary(%)
Sec. dropout(%)
Sec. general(%)
Sec. vocational(%)
Univ. dropout(9)
University(%)
Experience(Years)
VAR (Ln Y)

81,029
9.2
26.8
23.0
25.9
5.4
0.7
3.7
5.4
20
0.978

84,520
10.3
30.0
22.4
23.9
3.8
0.4
3.9
5.4
21
0.920

71,533
6.1
18.0
24.5
31.3
9.8
1.7
3.2
5.3
17
1.117

73,448
11.3
31.2
24.7
24.9
2.3
0.4
2.6
'2.8
20
1.042

108,503
1.6
10.8
16.8
29.5
16.9
2.0
7.8
14.7
18
0.446

No schooling
Prim, dropout
Sec. dropout
Sec. general
Sec. vocational
Univ. dropout
University
Experience
Exp-squared
Constant
R2

Source:

Notes:

EncuestaNacional de Ingreso - Gastode los Hogares.

The earningsvariable(Y) is in pesosfor the 3rd quarter.


H is the Hoursof work is not available.hoursworked.
*

Not statistically significantat the 5% level.

88 -

ANNEX4 ExrEDED EARNGS FuNcTIoNs


Panama 1989

Variable

Sample

Gender
Males

No schooling
Prim. dropout
Sec. dropout
Sec. general
Sec. vocational
Univ. dropout
University
Experience
Exp-squared
Log hours worked
Constant
R2
N

-0.236
-0.251
0.395
0.901
0.493
1.239
1.764
0.068
-0.0009
0.747
1.182
0.52
8,616

-0.238
-0.243
0.359
0.794
0.467
1.107
1.713
0.070
-0.0009
0.696
1.511
0.49
5,436

292
3.4
11.0
25.2
21.4
18.9
2.2
8.7
9.2
20
42
0.935

312
4.2
12.6
27.4
22.3
16.9
2.3
6.5
7.9
21
43
0.817

Sector

Females

Private

Public

-0.426
-0.348
0.516
1.190
0.600
1.572
1.993
0.068
-0.0009
0.690
1.045
0.61
3,180

-0.152
-0.218
0.353
0.800
0.406
1.170
1.767
0.066
-0.0009
0.745
1.159
0.46
6,041

-0.272
-0.161
0.309
0.676
0.540
0.870
1.310
0.039
-0.0004
0.601
2.506
0.45
2,575

Mew
Y (Local Curr.)
No schooling (%)
Prim. dropout (%)
Primary (%)
Sec. dropout (%)
Sec. general (%)
Sec. vocational (%)
Univ. dropout (%)
University (%)
E7xperience(Years)
Hours worked (Hours)
VAR (Ln Y)
Source:
Notes:

258
2.1
8.4
21.3
19.9
22.3
2.1
12.4
11.6
19
40
1.098

Encuesta Hogares - Mano de Obra (EMO), CEPAL.


The earnings variable (Y) is in balboasper month.
H is the weekly hours worked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% level.

232
4.5
13.8
29.4
22.9
15.9
2.3
6.5
4.7
20
42
0.935

434
0.9
4.5
15.1
18.0
25.9
2.0
13.8
19.8
20
40
0.388

89 -

AMEX 4. EXTENDEDEARNPGS FUNCTIONS


Paraguay 1983

Sector

Gender

Sample

Variable

Males

Females

Private

Public

-0.146
0.373
0.798
1.130
1.550
0.034
-0.0005
0.353
7.932
0.35

-0.163*
0.330
0.739
1.159
1.551
0.051
-0.0008
0.338
8.544
0.33

-0.145*
-0.110*
0.075*
0.294
1.054
0.036
-0.0006
0.3001
8.979
0.49

R2

-0.213
0.317
0.679
1.029
1.532
0.048
-0.0007
0.328
8.240
0.35

-0.222
0.189
0.547
0.898
1.390
0.050
-0.0008
0.280
8.681
0.37

1,723

1,042

681

1,501

222

Mean
Y (Local Curr.)
dropout (%)
Prim.

42,203
23.9

50,143
21.9

28,678
26.9

40,880
26.7

51,151
4.5

Pi mnary(%)

27.9

26.3

30.2

30.6

9.5

Sec. dropout (%)


Sec. general (%)
Univ. dropout (%)
University (%)
Experience (Years)
Hours worked (Hours)
VAR (Ln Y)

20.5
14.9
6.9
5.9
19
49
0.642

22.7
15.3
7.0
6.8
19
48
0.543

17.2
14.4
6.8
4.6
18
49
0.585

20.5
12.4
5.4
4.4
19
50
0.661

Prim. dropout
Sec. dropout
Sec. general
Univ. dropout
University
Experience
Exp-squared
Log hours worked
Constant

Source:
Notes:

Encuestade Hogares (Manode Obra).


The earnings variable (Y) is in guaranies per month.
H is the weeldy hours wor.ced.
* Not statisticallysignificantat the 5 % level.

20.7
32.0
17.1
16.2
17
39
0.415

-90-.
ANX 4. EXTnED EARNGS FUNCTIONS
Paraguay 1990

Males
No schooling
Prim. dropout
Sec. dropout
Sec. general
Univ. dropout
University
Experience
Exp-squared
Log hours worked
Constant
R2
N

-0.216
0.322
0.709
0.986
1.535
0.051
-0.0007
0.414
9.484
0.39
1,825

Sector

Gender

Sample

Variable

-0.226
0.192
0.569
0.797
1.394
0.057
-0.0009
0.343
10.042
0.44
1,084

Females

Private

Public

-0.230
0.257
0.748
1.118
1.498
0.040
-0.0005
0.380
9.427
0.36
741

-0.217
0.323
0.736
1.027
1.612
0.054
-0.0007
0.417
9.647
0.38
1,599

0.012*
0.130*
0.323
0.547
0.988
0.035
-0.0005
0.514
9.682
0.44
226

Mqean
Y (Local Curr.)
Prim. dropout(%)
Primary (%)
Sec. dropout (%)
Sec. general (%)
Univ. dropout (%)
University (%)
Experience (Years)
Hours worked (Hours)
VAR (Ln Y)
Source:
Notes:

239,861
15.0
25.3
22.0
23.5

7.9
6.4
19
49
0.624

290,496
14.9
22.3
25.1

165,787
15.0
29.7
17.4

23.8

22.9

7.0
6.8
20
50
0.514

9.2
5.8
18
48
0.590

Encuestade Hogares (Manode Obra).


The earnings variable (Y) is in guaraniesper month..
H is the weekly hours worked.
* Not statisticallysignificantat the 5% level.

236,360
16.8
28.1
23.1
31.1

5.7
5.2
20
51
0.651

264,629
1.8
5.8
14.2
39.8

23.5
15.0
16
38
0.362

- 91 -

ANNEX4. ExTENDEDEARNINGSFuNCTiONS
Peru 1990

Variable

Sample

Gender
Males

No schooling
Sec. general
Sec. vocational
Univ. dropout
Tertiary non-univ.
University
Experience
Exp-squared
Log hours worked
Constant

-0.198
0.202
0.318
0.543
0.381
0.871
0.053
-0.0008
0.527
6.716

R2

0.19

2,476

-0.172
0.174
0.276*
0.507
0.467
0.918
0.051
-0.0007
0.362
7.182
0.19
1,621

Mean
Y (Local Curr.)
No schooling (%)
Primary (%)
Sec. general (%)
Sec. vocational (%)
Univ. dropout (%)
Tertiary non-univ. (%)
University (%)
Experience (Years)
Hours worked (Hours)
VAR (Ln Y)

9,912
19.4
20.2
35.0
1.3
7.1
7.1
10.0
19
8.0
0.859

11,482
17.1
21.4
37.1
1.1
7.5
5.7
10.1
19
8.5
0.778

Sector

Females

Private

Public

-0.074*
0.260
0.510
0.553
0.392
0.792
0.055
-0.0009
0.465
6.616
0.14
855

-0.213
0.223
0.342
0.587
0.435
1.072
0.057
-0.0008
0.495
6.747
0.19
2,063

-0.193
0.206
0.237*
0.562
0.428
0.786
0.040
-0.0006
0.789
6.162

6,937
23.6
17.9
31.0
1.5
6.5
.9.6
9.8
18
7.1
0.878

10,295
21.8
22.6
35.4
1.3
6.4
5.9
6.7
19
8.0
0.908

Source:

1990 Peru Survey of Living Conditions,Lima.

Notes:

The earnings variable (Y) is in thousands of intis per month.


H is the daily hours worked.
* Not statistically significant at the 5% level.

C.23
413
8,002
7.5
8.2
32.9
1.2
10.9
13.1
26.2
18
7.9
0.613

-92 f
ANNEX4. ExrEDED EARNNGS FUNCTIONS
Uruguay 1989

Variable

Sample

Males
No schooling
Prim. dropout
Sec. dropout
Sec. general
Sec. vocational
Univ. dropout
University
Experience
Exp-squared
Log hours worked
Constant
N

-0.611
-0.346
0.253
0.489
0.609
0.706
1.101
0.042
-0.0006
0.832
7.780
0.38
10,981

-0.398
-0.333
0.199
0.520
0.437
0.642
1.059
0.049
-0.0007
0.602
8.761
0.32
6,567

Mean
Y (Local Curr.)
No schooling (%)
Prim. dropout (%)
Primary (%)
Sec. dropout (%)
Sec. general (%)
Sec. vocational (%)
Univ. dropout (%)
University (%)
Experience (Years)
Hours worked (Hours)
VAR (Ln Y)

145,840
0.9
13.0
51.6
12.2
7.6
5.4
3.6
5.7
24
44
0.743

178,086
0.7
14.3
52.1
14.4
5.5
5.0
3.3
4.9
24
49
0.545

R2

Source:
Notes:

Sector

Gender
Females

Private

Public

-0.538
-0.415
0.212
0.571
0.830
0.768
1.130
0.040
-0.0006
0.715
8.000
0.40
4,414

-0.560
-0.360
0.283
0.533
0.536
0.815
1.255
0.043
-0.0006
0.876
7.574
0.39
8,434

-0.412
-0.186
0.100
0.235
0.412
0.290
0.588
0.029
-0.0003
0.428
9.624
0.24
2,547

97,865
1.2
11.2
50.8
8.9
10.7
6.2
4.1
6.9
22
37
0.774

146,073
1.1
14.1
53.5
12.5
7.0
3.8
3.2
4.7
24
47
0.885

Encuesta Continua de Hogares, CEPAL.


The earnings variable (Y) is in pesos per month.
H is the weekly hours worked.
All coefficientsare statisticallysignificantat the 5% level.

145,069
0.2
9.4
45.1
11.1
9.5
10.8
4.9
8.9
24
42
0.205

-93 -

ANm=N4. EXTNDED EARNNGSFuNcToNs

Venezuela1989

Variable

Sample

Gender

Sector

Males

Females

Private

Public

No schooling

-0.351

-0.357

-0.272

-0.696

0.053*

Prim. dropout

-0.100

-0.147*

-0.183

-0.205

0.001*

Sec. dropout
Sec. general
Sec. vocational
Teacher training
Univ. dropout
University
Experience
Exp-squared
Log hours worked
Constant
R2
N

0.356
0.447
0.655
0.625
0.675
0.886
0.025
-0.0003
0.687
5.445
0.37
2,902

0.517
0.408
0.748
0.540
0.735
0.908
0.037
-0.0004
0.409
6.340
0.30
1,340

0.251
0.428
0.268
0.615
0.615
0.814
0.022
-0.0004
0.675
5.569
0.50
1,562

0.432
0.257
0.445
0.358
0.582
0.581
0.505
0.415
0.646
0.584
0.990
0.760
0.027
0.021
-0.0002 -0.0003
0.578
0.744
5.132
6.013
0.38
0.35
1,228
1,674

6,968
2.8
8.8
25.6
23.3
8.3
1.7
8.6
7.8
13.1
22
41
0.305

7,962
3.2
11.7
41.1
19.4
6.0
2.5
2.0
3.4
10.6
25
46
0.315

6,067
2.4
6.3
12.3
26.6
10.4
0.9
14.2
11.5
15.3
21
35
0.281

6,700
4.1
11.6
43.5
23.3
5.3
0.6
0.7
5.4
5.5
23
46
0.468

Men
Y (Local Curr.)
No schooling (%)
Prim. dropout (%)
Primary (%)
Sec. dropout (%)
Sec. general(%)
Sec. vocational (%)
Teacher training (%)
Univ. dropout (%)
University (%)
Experience (Years)
Hours worked (Hours)
VAR (Ln Y)
Source:
Notes:

Encuesta de Hogarespor Muestra, CEPAL.


The earnings variable (Y) is in bolfvaresper month.
H is the weekly hours worked.
* Not statistically significantat the 5% level.

7,036
1.9
6.8
12.5
23.3
10.6
2.4
14.3
9.6
18.7
22
37
0.167

Policy Research Working Paper Series


Contact

Title

Author

Date

for paper

WPS1047 C6te d'lvoire: PrivateSector


Dynamicsand Constraints

EnriqueRueda-Sabater
AndrewStone

November1992

P. Infante
37642

WPS1048 Targetsand Indicatorsin World


Bank PopulationProjects

GeorgeBaldwin

November1992

0. Nadora
31091

WPS1049 MoneyDemandand SeignorageMaximizingInflation

WilliamEasterly
PaoloMauro
KlausSchmidt-Hebbel

November1992

R. Martin
31448

WPS1050MarginalIncomeTax Ratesand

WilliamEasterly
SergioRebelo

November1992

R. Martin
31448

CherylW. Gray

November1992

M. Berg
36969

WPS1052 A Reappraisalof HowOral


HodaRashad
Rehydratbon
Therapy AffectedMortality
in Egypt

November1992

0. Nadora
31091

WPS1053 Developmentof theZimbabwe


FamilyPlanningProgram

Alex F. Zinanga

December1992

0. Nadora
31091

WPS1054 DistributionalImpactof Cash and


In-KindSocial Transfersin Eastern
Europeand Russia

BrankoMilanovic

December1992

S. Moussa
39019

WPS1055 Wealth,WeatherRisk,and the


(omposition and Profitabilityof
AgriculturalInvestments

Mark R. Rosenzweig
Hans P. Binswanger

December1992

C. Banton
34783

WPS1056 Earningsand Educationin Latin


America:AssessingPrioritiesfor
Schooling Investments

GeorgePsacharopoulos December1992
YingChu Ng

EconomicGrowthin Developing
Countries
WPS1051 The Legal Frameworkfor Private
SectorActivity in the Czech and
SlovakFederalRepublic

WPS1057 Measuringthe Incomesof Economies Socio-EconomicData


of the FormerSovietUnion
Division
InternationalEconomics
Department

December1992

L. Longo
39244

E. Zamora

Policy Research Working Paper Series


Contact
for paper

Author

Date

My T. Vu
EduardBos
Ann Levin

November1992

0. Nadora
31091

WPS1034 RevisingFinancialSectorPolicy
David H. Scott
in TransitionalSocialistEconomies:
Will UniversalBanksProveViable?

November1992

K. Waelti
37664

WPS1035 How ImportProtectionAffectsthe


Philippines'Motor VehicleIndustry

WendyE. Takacs

November1992

D. Ballantyne
37947

WPS1 036 OutputDeclinein Hungary


and Polandin 1990-91:Structural
Changeand AggregateShocks

SimonCommander
FabrizioCoricelli

November1992

0. del Cid
35195

November1992

C. Cristobal
33640

November1992
WPS1038 Determinantsof ExpatriateWorkers' IbrahimA. Elbadawi
Remittancesin NorthAfrica and
Robertde RezendeRocha
Europe

A. Maraf'on
31450

WPS1039 Fducation, Externalities,Fertility,


and EconomicGrowth

MartinWeale

November1992

PHREE
33680

WPS1040 Lessonsof Trade Liberalizationin


LatinAmericafor Economiesin
Transition

Jaimede Melo
SumanaDhar

November1992

D. Ballantyne
37947

WPSI 41 Family PlanningSuccessStoriesin


Bangladeshand India

MoniNag

November1992

0. Nadora
31091

WPS1042 FamilyPlanningSuccessin Two


CitiesinZaire

Jane T. Bertrand
Judith E. Brown

November1992

0. Nadora
31091

WPS1043 DerivingDevelopingCountry
Stijn Claessens
RepaymentCapacityfromthe Market GeorgePennacchi
Pricesof SovereignDebt

November1992

R. Vo
33722

WPS1044 HospitalCost Functionsfor


DevelopingCountries

November1992

0. Nadora
31091

WPS1045 SocialGainsfrom FemaleEducation: KalanidhiSubbarao


A Cross-NationalStudy
Laura Raney

November1992

M. Abundo
36820

WPS1046World BankProject-Financed
Researchon Population,Health,
and Nutrition

November1992

0. Nadora
31091

Title
WPS1033 Latin Americaand the Caribbean
Region(andNorthernAmerica)
PopulationProjections,1992-93
Edition

Ana-MariaArriagada
WPS1037 VocationalSecondarySchooling.
OccupationalChoice,and Earnings AdrianZiderman
in Brazil

Adam Wagstaff
HowardBarnum

J. PriceGittinger
CarolBradford

Anda mungkin juga menyukai