A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Received 5 March 2014
Received in revised form 28 October 2015
Accepted 29 October 2015
Available online 10 November 2015
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of incontinence management on informal caregivers of
older persons with incontinence. In order to investigate this phenomenon in different welfare systems
via qualitative interviews and a content analysis methodology, the study was carried out in four European
countries (Italy, the Netherlands, Slovak Republic and Sweden). To this purpose, 50 semi-structured
interviews were conducted with spouses and children of older people receiving their help to manage the
consequences of involuntary urinary and/or faecal leakage. Findings show that incontinence has a
remarkably strong effect on caregivers quality of life, because it results in progressive social isolation,
causing them nancial problems as well as psychological and physical exhaustion. The lack of
appropriate support and the general silence regarding the problem, which is still considered a taboo by
many, aggravate the caregivers situation. It is therefore crucial that caregivers can count on a strong
public and private support network, appropriate information and suitable incontinent products, in order
to better handle incontinence and care tasks in general.
2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Older people
Incontinence
Caregivers burden
Isolation
Supports
Pad
Taboo
1. Introduction
1.1. Incontinence among older people
The International Continence Society (ICS) denes Urinary
Incontinence (UI) as any involuntary loss of urine (Abrams et al.,
2002). According to the standardisation of terminology given by
the ICS (Tarnay & Bhatia, 2012), there are ve types of UI: Urgent
Urinary Incontinence (UUI), Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI),
Mixed Urinary Incontinence (MUI), Nocturnal Enuresis (NE), and
Continuous Urinary Incontinence (CUI).
Each UI typology has different signs, symptoms, conditions and
treatments. Around the world, UI affects from 3% to 23% of men and
from 11% to 52% of women (Burti, Barsante Santos, Pereire, Zambon
& Marques, 2011). Prevalence rates are higher in older age. Older
women are more likely to report mixed and urgent incontinence,
while young and middle aged women generally report stress
incontinence. For daily incontinence, prevalence ranges from 5%
to 15% among middle-aged and older women (Abrams, Cardozo,
Khoury, & Wein, 2009). UI is more frequent among persons
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +0039 071 800 4798; fax: +0039 071 35941.
E-mail address: s.santini2@inrca.it (S. Santini).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2015.10.013
0167-4943/ 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
93
94
1
The data reported in this article were collected as part of the Quality of life in
caregivers of dependent people affected by incontinence in Europe project, funded
by SCA Hygiene Products AB and carried out by EUROCARERS. This article was
prepared on behalf of the SCA-EUROCARERS partnership, represented by following
teams: for Italy: Giovanni Lamura, Sabrina Quattrini and Sara Santini; for the
Netherlands: Roelf van der Veen and Sabina Mak; for Sweden: Elisabeth Hanson and
Gunnel Andersson; for the Slovak Republic: Bernardina Bodnarova.
Interviews
Country
Italy
Netherlands
Slovak Republic
Sweden
Planned
Performed
16
13
16
9
16
17
16
11
Total
64
50
95
built on the basis of the topic guide (i.e., according to the predened topics of medical history, problems, impact and
daily routine), while two additional levels with sub-categories
were built after the material was read in its entirety. This followed
the evidence emerging from the specic data based on each
countrys national features, leading to new categories based on the
combination of initial categories.
In each country the interviews were audio-recorded and
transcribed verbatim. The analysis was supported by the
MAXQDA software for classifying, connecting and combining
data. The researchers who carried out the interviews also
transcribed the textual material and carried out its analysis, using
the same, common code system (both within each national
research team and across the teams building the research
consortium). After a long debate, the code system was agreed
upon, which initially led to agreement on the main categories, and
later to nalising the sub-categories once the analysis was
progressing, by comparing the sub-categories gradually arising
in the different national contexts.
According to the four criteria identied by Lincoln and Guba
(1985) for assessing the trustworthiness of qualitative studies (i.e.,
credibility, transferability, dependability and conrmability), this
inquiry attempted to match them by both ensuring methodological
rigor and tracking internal processes (Shenton, 2004; Golafshani,
2003). The credibility of the study was sought through the use of
several expedients. The rst lied in the use of a data collection tool
based partly on questionnaires already successfully applied in
previous projects concerning caregiver burden and quality of life.
This kind of data was used for conrming or not what interviewees
stated during the qualitative interview. The latter had a structure
that allowed for a thick description of the care situation (in terms
of economic, social, family and health conditions potentially
affecting it). Credibility was also reached through frequent
debrieng sessions between researchers, the senior coordinator
and peer scrutiny of the research project. Indeed, national research
teams included a senior researcher for the project coordination
and one researcher for data collection and analysis who was
especially skilled in qualitative research techniques. The latter was
responsible for ensuring quality during the data analysis and
interpretation through frequent discussions and constant reective commentary among teams and also within each team with the
senior researcher in order to limit the investigators bias. As all
researchers involved in this study had worked for a long time in the
area of informal caregivers for older people and had a longstanding
experience in using a qualitative approach, they were already wellacquainted with the culture of participants and their concerns
knew in-depth. Nevertheless, the research consortium met in Italy
before starting the data collection and researchers went over the
protocol, the Problem Centred Interview tool and the active,
effective and empathic listening technique, leaded by an Italian
researcher involved in the study. Researchers also dened and
agreed upon the rules for data transcription and analysis.
Furthermore, the transferability criterion was achieved through
the examination of previous research ndings: a literature review
was carried out in order to assess if the achieved results were
congruent with those reached by past researches. The purpose of
this comparison with other ndings referring to the same issue but
emerging in other cultural and geographical contexts, was twofold:
on the one hand, it helped to design a protocol allowing for the
transferability of the study; on the other hand, it made researchers
aware that the obtained ndings should be considered as a
baseline contribution to be compared with future studies for
further developments.
Study dependability was addressed thanks to the description of
research design and its realisation, and details of data collection
and analysis processes.
96
Table 2
Caregivers characteristics (n = 50).
Italy
Netherlands
Slovak Republic
Sweden
Total
57.0
66.7
59.06
78.0
65.19
0
13 (100%)
13 (100%
3 (33%)
6 (66%)
9 (100%)
5 (29%)
12 (71%)
17 (100%)
1 (9%)
10 (91%)
11 (100%)
9 (18%)
41 (82%)
50 (100%)
12 (92%)
0
0
1 (8%)
13 (100%)
8 (89%)
1 (11%)
0
0
9 (100%)
14 (82%)
1 (6%)
2 (12%)
0
17 (100%)
11 (100%)
0
0
0
0 (100%)
45 (90%)
2 (4%)
2 (4%)
1 (2%)
50 (100%)
6 (66%)
3 (33%)
0
9 (100%)
8 (47%)
8 (47%)
1 (6%)
17 (100%)
10 (91%)
1 (9%)
0
11 (100%)
25 (50%)
24 (48%)
1 (2%)
50 (100%)
As for conrmability (objectivity), this represents a controversial issue for a qualitative study, and as such is a difcult issue to
solve. Nevertheless, the consortium tried to overcome this problem
by justifying the choice of the methods adopted, admitting the
researchers predispositions, explaining the reasons behind the
decisions made, and identifying both strengths and weaknesses of
this approach.
2.4. Sample description
Women made up the large majority of the sample across the
four countries: over four-fths of all interviewees were women
(see Table 2). Participants in Italy were primarily daughters in their
late 50s and in Sweden all female participants were wives in their
late 70s, while Dutch and Slovakian caregivers showed a more
balanced composition for the two groups.
2.5. Impact of incontinence on caregivers daily lives
2.5.1. Caring tasks and difculties in daily life
In all countries, it was not very easy for caregivers to distinguish
incontinence care tasks from other forms of help they provide to
their loved one. Generally, the effort required by the caregiver for
toileting the incontinent person depends on the type, level and
frequency of leakages and on the general health condition of the
person who is being cared for.
Table 3 shows the type of incontinence suffered by the care
recipients, highlighting that the great majority of them (two thirds)
are affected by both urinary and faecal incontinence. This means
care recipients have to be changed and washed many times a day,
requiring constant watchfulness and a substantial effort from their
caregivers.
The daily routine activity most frequently reported by caregivers of family members with incontinence is cleaning and
washing the care recipients, their clothes and bed sheets. The
caregivers do the cleaning and changing of incontinence products
in different settings (in the bedroom or the bathroom) and with
Table 3
Type of incontinence.
Type of incontinence
Italy
n (%)
Netherlands
n (%)
Slovak Republic
n (%)
Swedish
n (%)
Total
n (%)
Urine only
Urine and faeces
Total
3 (23%)
10 (77%)
13 (100%)
4 (44%)
5 (55%)
9 (100%)
5 (29%)
12 (71%)
17 (100%)
5 (45%)
6 (55%)
11 (100%)
17 (34%)
33 (66%)
50 (100%)
Anyway, its something I think about all the time. If shes wet, I
leave everything and go and change her pad straight away (Slovak
Republic)
Many Italian caregivers reported that they did not use the right
or most appropriate incontinence products when the incontinence
problems started, particularly due to their lack of knowledge and
experience. Some of them did spend time and effort searching for
the absorbent product that best suited their relatives needs, such
as for instance hypoallergenic products in cases of users with
sensitive skin, or absorbent pants (pull ups), which seemed to be
preferred by older people with some partially remaining cognitive
abilities:
Caring for an incontinent person is an important skill which,
unfortunately, no one teaches you [ . . . ]: how to cut the bottom
absorbent pad that you put double or to fold the edges from the
inside, otherwise the urine escapes. I mean there are so many
trivial things, which we were not told, and Im upset with the
health operator. I mean, why isnt there anyone explaining this to
us? [...] (Italy)
One caregiver reported that her mother did not accept wearing
pads and the caregivers efforts were aimed at preventing her from
tearing the pads into bits or from hiding them. Changing pads and
cleaning the older relatives became more difcult in cases where
the latter were not cooperative.
2.5.2. Family relationships
Many caregivers reported drastic changes in their relationship
with their older parents,that seems to be turned upside down by
the changes imposed by the new caregiving needs and activities.
While in the past parents used to help their children, now they are
the ones needing care and support, thus children become parents
and parents become children. Such a role change caused suffering
and embarrassment to many caregivers:
We have double roles, and they overlap each other in the wrong
way. Sometimes, I would still like to have my strong mother who
can support me, because I also need help in one way or another.
(Sweden)
Partners acting as caregivers felt their love relationship had
turned into a caregiverclient relationship or a parentchild
relationship. Some people with dementia who were being cared for
did not show their love anymore or did not seem to bother with
their caregivers well-being. However, a few caregivers still found a
special way to connect with their husbands and wives by hugging,
talking and making eye contact, and two husbands still felt really
proud of their beautiful wives.
Some children said their relationship had automatically
changed or even had to change before they were able to provide
this type of care. In Italy, for instance, the main caregivers (often a
women) were used to deaingl with family relationships and
mediating the relationships between their parents, who were
upset by the disease. Even if caregivers families felt more united in
the common effort of caring for the loved one, in the majority of
cases, the presence of a disabled older person, the fatigue and the
lack of leisure might created tension and anxiety, which often
degenerated into arguments, as reported by one middle-aged
women who struggled to nd a new balance in the relationship
with her mother (affected by Alzheimers), father and sister:
And even the relationship with my father has become a little
harder, maybe because each of us sees the disease in a certain way
or we accept it in a different way. Dad still does not accept my
mothers disease so he insists that she will get better. But
unfortunately she is not improving and he does not accept it. We
tell him: You must accept it, you must accept the Migrant Care
Worker and Mums condition... Even though it hurts me as well,
97
98
99
100
Elenskaia, K., Haidvogel, K., Heidinger, C., Doerer, D., Umek, W., & Hanzal, E. (2011).
The greatest taboo: urinary incontinence as a source of shame and
embarrassment. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 123(October (1920)), 607610.
Eurostat, Population structure and ageing (2012). http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/
statistics_explained/index.php/Population_structure_and_ageing.
Garcia, J. A., Crocker, J., & Wyman, J. F. (2005). Breaking the cycle of stigmatization:
managing the stigma of incontinence in social interactions. Journal of Wound,
Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 32(January/February (1)), 3852.
Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research.
The Qualitative Report, 8(December (4)), 597607.
Gotoh, M., Matsukawa, Y., Yoshikawa, Y., Funahashi, Y., Kato, M., & Hattori, R. (2009).
Impact of urinary incontinence on the psychological burden of family carers.
Neurourology and Urodynamics, 28(6), 492496.
Hayder, D., & Schnepp, W. (2008). Urinary incontinencethe family carers
perspective. Gerontology & Geriatrics, 41(4), 261266.
Lane, P., McKenna, H., Ryan, A., & Fleming, P. (2003). The experience of the family
carers role: a qualitative study. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, 17(2),
137151.
Langa, K. M., Fultz, N. H., Saint, S., Kabeto, M. U., & Herzog, A. R. (2002). Informal
caring time and costs for urinary incontinence in older individuals in the United
States. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50(4), 733737.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Lobchuk, M., & Rosenberg, F. (2014). A qualitative analysis of individual and
caregiver responses to the impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life.
Journal of Wound Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 41(6), 589596.
Mahoney, F. I., & Barthel, D. (1965). Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index.
Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 5661.
Mayring, Ph (2000). Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research,
1(2) Art. 20, http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0002204.
Mayring, Ph. (2008). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken.
Weinheim und Basel. 10th ed. (in German).
McKee, K. J., Philp, I., Lamura, G., Prouskas, C., Oberg, B., Krevers, B., et al. (2003). The
COPE indexa rst stage assessment of negative impact, positive value and
quality of support of caregiving in informal carers of older people. Aging Mental
Health, 7(January (1)), 3952.
Melchiorre, M.G., Di Rosa, M., Chiatti, C., & Lamura, G. (2010). Italia ed Europa a
confronto, Network Non Autosufcienza-Lassistenza agli anziani non
autosufcienti in Italia-Rapporto 2010, Santarcangelo di Romagna, Maggioli,
http://www.maggioli.it/rna/2011/pdf/rapporto2011-assistenza_anziani.pdf (in
Italian).
Mitteness, L. S., & Barker, J. C. (1995). Stigmatizing a normal condition: urinary
incontinence in late life. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 9(2), 188210.
Molander, U., Sundh, V., & Steen, B. (2002). Urinary incontinence, its inuence on
daily life, and use of incontinence aids in two cohorts of 85/86-year-old freeliving men and women, born ten years apart. Archives of Gerontology and
Geriatrics 35, 275281. www.elsevier.com/locate/archger.
Mutema, K. E. (2009). Stress incontinence: are we tackling the right enemy? Clinical
Reviews and Opinions, 1(2), 026028 http://www.academicjournals.org/cro
2009 Academic Journals.
Paterson, J., Dunn, S., Kowanko, I., van Loon, A., Stein, I., & Pretty, L. (2003). Selection
of continence products: perspectives of people who have incontinence and
their carers. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(17), 955963.
Popper, K. R. (1934). Logik der Forschung. Wien: Springer (Italian translation Logica
della scoperta scientica, Einaudi, Torino, 1970).
Principi, A., Hoff, A., Santini, S., Hamblin, K., Lamura, G., on behalf of the
carers@work Consortium. (2010). Intergenerational Ambivalences in Combining
Employment with Care-giving to Older Parents in Germany, Italy, Poland, and the
UK. Paper at V European Society on Family Relations Congress, 29 September
2 October, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milano.
Ricol, L. (1998). La ricerca qualitativa. Roma: Carocci.
Sanders, S., Bern-Klug, M., Specht, J., Mobily, P. R., & Bossen, A. (2012). Expanding the
role of long-term care social workers: assessment and intervention related to
urinary incontinence. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 55(3), 262281.
Santini, S., Principi, A., & Lamura, G. (2011). Carers between Work and Care. Conict or
Chance? Results of Interviews with Working Carers, http://www.carersatwork.tudortmund.de/download/National%20report%20Italy.pdf.
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research
projects. Education for Information, 22, 6375.
Steiner, V., Pierce, L., Drahuschak, S., Nofziger, E., Buchman, D., & Szirony, T. (2008).
Emotional support, physical help, and health of carers of stroke survivors. The
Journal of Neuroscience, 40(1), 4854.
Stenzelius, K., Mattiasson, A., Hallberg, I. R., & Westergren, A. (2004). Symptoms of
urinary and faecal incontinence among men and women 75+ in relations to
health complaints and quality of life. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 23(3), 211
222.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory
procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.
Tarnay, C.M., & Bhatia, N.N. (2012). Urinary Incontinence Overview, http://www.
health.am/gyneco/urinary-incontinence-overview/.
Teunissen, D., van Weel, C., & Lagro-Janssen, T. (2005). Urinary incontinence in older
people living in the community: examining help-seeking behaviour. British
Journal of General Practice, 55(519), 776782.
Thomas, P., Ingrand, P., Lalloue, F., Hazif-Thomas, C., Billon, R., Viban, F., et al.
(2004). Reasons of informal carers for institutionalizing dementia clients
previously living at home: the Pixel study. International Journal of Geriatric
Psychiatry, 19(2), 127135.
101
http://eurocarers.org/userles/le/Carers%20managing%
20incontinenceFinal5%2011.pdf.
Witzel, A. (2000). The problem-centred interview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research
Sozialforschung, 1(1), 19 Art. 22, http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.
php/fqs/article/view/1132/2522.