R. Ashok Kumar
Research Scholar
Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Trinelveli.
Abstract
Stochastic model is developed to attain the expected time to reach the performance measure level, in
the background with assumptions that the times between judgments epochs are independent and
identically distributed (i.i.d) random variable. Attempt made using Additive Weibull Distribution to
check if this particular distribution fits the shock model approach.
Keywords: Expected Time, Variance, Recruitment, Additive Weibull distribution, Manpower
Planning.
1. Introduction
Manpower planning has attracted the attention of management scientists in the past
few years as a fruitful area both for theoretical analysis and practical application. Manpower planning
consists of placing right number of people, right kind of people at the right place, right time, doing the
right things for which they are suited for the achievement of goals of the organization. In recent times
managers and administrators have realized that the effective function of their manpower has a great
impact on the overall performance of the firm. Poor manpower planning can result in "incessant
employment and terminations. Apart from this, more and more firms are developing strategic
manpower plans and are integrating those plans with other strategic planning activities.
Manpower planning is useful in business and industrial sectors. Since the human
behavior is random in nature, stochastic model provide the basic frame work for efficient analysis and
design of a manpower systems. In [ [3], [4], [6] and [7] the authors have obtained the mean time to
recruitment in a threshold organization using shock model approach. The Weibull distribution has
been used in many different fields with many applications, see for example Lai, Xie [8] and Murthy
[5]. The hazard function of the Weibull distribution can only be increasing, decreasing or constant.
Thus it cannot be used to model lifetime data with a bathtub shaped hazard function, such as human
mortality and machine life cycles. For many years, researchers have been developing various
extensions and modified forms of the Weibull distribution, with different number of parameters.
Mathematical model is obtained for the expected time of breakdown point to reach the
threshold level through Additive Weibull distribution. One can see for more detail in Esary et al.,
(1973), Sathiyamoorthi (1980), Pandiyan et al., (2010) Kannadasan et al., (2013) and Kannadasan et
al., (2015) about the expected time to cross the threshold level of the organization.
2. Assumptions of the Models
In order to develop the mathematical model, four basic assumptions are made
concerning the distributions of the involved random variables.
The organization takes decisions on revising policies at random times, where the interdecision times, which are called epochs, are i.i.d. random variables.
At every epoch a random number of persons quit the organization.
The organization is exposed to a break down situation when the number of exits of personnel
exceeds a threshold level.
The threshold level is represented by a random variable following an Additive Weibull
distribution.
3. Notations
Xi
i=1,2,3, k and
Y
X 'i s
X i= X
X i= X for all i .
: A continuous random variable denoting the threshold level having the Additive
Weibull Distribution.
g ( .)
gk ( . )
g ( . )
gk ( . )
Xi
g ( . ) i.e., p.d.f. of
gk (.)
i=1
i=1
Xi Xi
: Laplace transform of
gk (.)
h(.)
: The probability density functions of random threshold level which has the Additive
f (.)
f (.)
epochs.
: p.d.f. of random variable
function.
V k (t)
V k ( t ) : Fk ( t )F k+1 (t )
F k ( t )F k+1 ( t )
Fk (t )
S ( .)
S (.) :
The
survivor
function
i.e.,
L(t)
1S ( t )=L(t)
4. Model Description
A random variable X is said to have an Additive Weibull distribution if its cumulative
distribution function (cdf) is
F ( x )=1ex x x 0
and
and
f ( x )=( x 1+ x 1 ) ex x
( x )=1F ( x )
H
ex x
Now, assuming that the threshold Y follows Additive Weibull distribution with parameter
, it can
be proved that
( x ) dx
P ( X i <Y ) = g k ( x ) H
0
g k ( x ) ex x
[ g ex( + ) ] (1)
The survival function
P (T >t )= V k ( t ) P ( X i <Y )
k=0
[ F k ( t )F k+1 ( t ) ] [ g ( + ) ] (2)
k=0
be shown that
{ [
L(T ) , We get
k=0
F k ( t )F k+1 ( t ) ] [ g ( + )]
k1
[ 1g ( + ) ] F k ( t ) [ 1g ( + ) ]
k=1
(3)
l ( s )=
[ 1g (+ )] f (s) (4 )
[ 1g (+ )f (s) ]
Now
( c c+ s )
f ( s )=
c
(
c+ s )
c
1g ( + )(
[
c+ s ) ]
[ 1g ( + )]
[1g ( + )] c
[ c+ sg ( + ) c ]
(5)
We know that
E (T )=
d
l ( s ) givens=0
ds
(1) [ 1g ( + ) ] c
[ c +sg ( + ) c ]
1
(6)
c [ 1g ( + ) ]
g ( . ) exp ( ) , g ( ) exp
E (T )=
( + ) ,
c 1
+ +
( + ) ( + )
c [ 2 ]
(7)
We know that
E (T2)=
d2 ( )
l s given s=0
d s2
E (T2)=
c 2 1
+ +
2 ( + ) (+ )
2
c 2 [ ]
(8)
2
V (T )=E ( T ) [ E ( T ) ]
2 ( + )2 (+ )2
2
c 2 [ ]
( + )2 ( + )2
c 2 [ ]
( + )2 ( + )2
2
c 2 [ ]
(7) and (8) give the mean and variance of the time to recruitment for the present model.
= 1.5
=2
0.5
0
9 10
Figure: 1a
Variance of Recruitment
10
8
Variance
= 0.5V(T)
6
4 = 1
= 1.5
=2
2
0
10
10
Figure: 1b
Variance of Recruitment
10
8
Variance
= 0.5V(T)
6
4 = 1
= 1.5
=2
2
0
Figure: 2a
= 1.5
=2
0.5
0
9 10
Figure: 2b
Variance of Recruitment
2
1.5
Variance
= 0.5V(T)
1
=1
0.5
0
= 1.5
=2
10
Figure: 3a
= 1.5
=2
0.5
0
9 10
Figure: 3b
Variance of Recruitment
0.5
0.4
0.3
Variance
V(T)
= 0.5
0.2 = 1
= 1.5
=2
0.1
0
Figure: 3c
5. Conclusion
From the results for the performance measures, we note that the mean and variance of
and
time increases the time to recruitment in an organization decreases in all the cases found. Hence, the
results obtained are better from the organizations point of view when the inter-decision times are
10 ACCESSING THE PERFORMANCE MEASURE IN AN ORGANIZATION THROUGH ADDITIVE
WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION BY Dr. P. Gajivaradhan et al.
correlated. In the context of attrition, the model developed in this paper can be utilized to plan for
adequate provision of manpower in the organization. The goodness of fit for the distribution assumed
in this paper can be tested by collecting relevant data. Further, the observations on the performance
measures given in this paper will be useful to enhance the simplification of the calculation of the
manpower profile in future manpower development expectation, not only on industry but also in a
wider field.
When
' c' ,
which follows exponential distribution, is an increasing parameter. Therefore, the value of the
expected time
E(T )
to cross the threshold is decreasing, for all cases of the parameter value
decreasing, this is observed in Figure 1a. The same case is found in variance
V (T )
which is
E(T )
' c'
=0.5,1,1 .5,2.
increases, the expected time is found decreasing. This is indicated in Figure 2a. The same case is
When
' c'
increases, the expected time is found decreasing. This is indicated in Figure 3a. The same case is
References
1. Esary, J. D., Marshall, A. W. and Proschan, F. 1973; Shock models and wear processes, Ann.
Probability, 1(4): 627-649.
2. Ibrahim, E. and Gokarna, A. 2013; On the Transmuted Additive Weibull Distribution,
Austrian Journal of Statistics, Vol. 42, No. 2: 117132.
3. Kannadasan, K. and Vinoth, R. 2015; Calculating The Expected Time to Control the
Recruitment When System Fails, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and
Modern Education, Vol.1, No.1: 288-292.
4. Kannadasan, K., Pandiyan, P., Vinoth R. and Saminathan, R. 2013; Time to recruitment in an
organization through three parameter generalized exponential model, Journal of Reliability
and Statistical Studies, Vol.6, No.1: 21-28.
5. Lai, C. D., Xie, M., and Murthy, D. N. 2001; Bathtub shaped failure rate distributions, In N.
Balakrishanan and C. R. Rao (Eds.), Handbook in Reliability, Vol. 20: 69-104.
6. Pandiyan, P., Bose, S. C. G., Vinoth, R. and Kannadasan, K. 2012; An effective Manpower
Planning approach in an Organization through Two grade System, International Journal of
Research in Management, Vol.3, No.2: 110-115.
7. Sathiyamoorthi, R. 1980; Cumulative damage model with correlated inter arrival time of
shocks, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R-29, No.3.
8. Xie, M. and Lai, C. D. 1995; Reliability analysis using an additive Weibull model with
bathtub-shaped failure rate function, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol.52: 8793.