Context
For 25 minutes each day, all students are pulled out to receive intensive instruction designed
to reduce/eliminate educational deficits. The current intervention focus for all 2nd graders is
phonics. Students are divided into groups by ability level and need; this group is made up
of 12 of the students with the lowest scores on a recent phonics inventory. Most of the
students are non-newcomer ELLs, with Hmong, Lao or Spanish as their native languages; a
few have learning disabilities. These students have been attending daily phonics
intervention for approximately three weeks.
Lesson Materials
Lesson 13 chart
Lesson 13 workbook page
Pencils
Dry erase board and markers
Procedures
Pre-Activities: Description Time Frame Objective(s) Targeted
Teacher utters individual phonemes (eg. /s/ - /t/ - 5 min Recognizing and
/a/ - /p/). Students listen, trying to blend the combining phonemes
phonemes into actual words (eg. “stop”),
indicating with a thumbs-up when they’ve
figured it out. Teacher calls on one of the
students to tell what word was made, then writes
the word on the board, divided into phonemes.
Repeat with “play,” “frame,” “place,” and
Lindsay Kaye Ohlert
CI 5699 Video Observation, Fall 2009
Page 2 of 9
Students mark all /k/, /sh/ and /th/ in the “read Sponge Recognizing digraphs
carefully” columns of the workbook page if they
finish the “read the story” activity before the rest
of the class is ready to correct it.
Assessment
Informal: teacher monitoring of student performance on workbook activities
Formal: post-test phonics inventory to be conducted next week
Reflection/additional comments
This is a mandated Mondo lesson – the scope and sequence is predetermined (i.e., I didn’t
choose the content, nor the order in which the content is being taught, and I have limited
options for activities).
Feedback
Lindsay Kaye Ohlert
CI 5699 Video Observation, Fall 2009
Page 3 of 9
Watching oneself from the outside is always so odd. My first impression is that I speak
and gesture much more theatrically than I thought – I don’t generally think of myself as a
particularly animated person. So I’m not sure whether the students are paying attention because
they’re actively engaged in the content, or if they’re paying attention because the teacher is
weird.
That said, they are paying attention, which is good to see, and they look happy to be
doing so. A couple of the kids seated close to the camera occasionally turn to peek at it, but
other than that, everyone’s eyes are on either me, the board, classmates who’ve been called on,
or their assignments almost the entire time, and their body language indicates attention – they’re
leaning forward, and their faces register reactions to what’s going on, and they’re responding
using the kinesthetic cues we habitually use in class (e.g. “thumbs up as soon as you figure out
the answer”). Considering how hard it is to consistently keep 2nd graders on task, particularly on
tasks like phonics activities that, quite honestly, don’t have much inherent interest, I am very
pleased to see this. A recent standardized benchmark indicated that this group has made great
strides in their phonemic awareness and ability to decode, and I think that is probably partly
attributable to their attentiveness – they’re attentive enough that we don’t waste much time on
One worrisome thing I noticed when watching the video is that one of the students
appears to be taking most of his cues for how to respond from his classmates. When the students
respond chorally, he’s almost always a beat behind; when they respond kinesthetically, he often
glances at his neighbors and mimics their actions. It occurs to me that this is probably inflating
my estimation of both his English proficiency and his comprehension of the material being
Lindsay Kaye Ohlert
CI 5699 Video Observation, Fall 2009
Page 4 of 9
worked with. Going forward, I will need to make a point of more frequently asking him
Another thing the video revealed, which I feel a bit guilty about, is that I misinterpreted
the actions of a student at one point. I got after him because I thought he was goofing around
under the table, maybe bothering a neighbor, but actually, he had one of the papers from today’s
assignment down there and was poking the words with his pencil as he read them. At least I was
affable about it – I just told him in a conversational tone to fix the way he was sitting in his seat –
but this is an important reminder to me that I shouldn’t assume that a kid is misbehaving just
The video also made me aware that students are occasionally responding with a groan or
frustrated body language when I call on a different student and that student gets the correct
answer. I assume this is because they wanted to have a chance to answer themselves, and while
I’m pleased that they’re that eager to display their knowledge, one of my goals is fostering a
classroom culture where students actively support and encourage one another, and this sort of
behavior is not in line with that. I think I need to make a point of both encouraging students to
celebrate other students’ successes, and also come up with more ways for students to feel that
But all in all, the video basically matches my memory of events. Of course, it’s easier to
keep track of what’s going with a group of 12 students than it is a full-sized class, but since
beginning my teaching career I have made a point of developing “soft eyes” – the ability to
watch and take in a whole scene simultaneously, rather than focusing only on the most attention-
grabbing parts of it or focusing on various elements serially – and I’m pleased that apparently I
Lindsay Kaye Ohlert
CI 5699 Video Observation, Fall 2009
Page 5 of 9
have made strides in this area. I know that when I first started teaching, I had a lot of difficulty
parallel processing, and as a result missed much of what was happening in my classroom.
The class also played out almost exactly per the lesson plan, other than the fact that we
lingered a bit longer on “pre” activities and so did not quite complete the “post” activity. If this
were a different class, say, Reader’s Workshop, I might be concerned that my absolute adherence
to the lesson plan indicated a lack of flexibility in responding to students’ needs and the natural
flow of classroom dynamics, but since this was a 25 minute phonics lesson and I was explicitly
required by higher-ups to cover certain content in a certain time frame, I’m going to take the fact
that we managed to do so without any students getting lost, bored or confused as a good sign, a
sign that I managed to tailor the instructional delivery and pacing of a mandated lesson to fit my
specific students.
Overall, I am pleased with what I saw in this video, and pleased that both the students
and I look engaged, comfortable and cheerful throughout. As someone who has previously
worked primarily with secondary students, at the start of this student teaching assignment, I
honestly felt a little trepidation about how well I’d be able to understand and connect with young
children. While I think I still prefer teaching middle and high school to teaching elementary, it’s
For better or worse, my actions in this videotaped lesson place me firmly in the role of
“strong leader.” I am leading using soft power, certainly – I don’t give many commands, instead
relying on praise of desired behaviors and effortful responses, and statements like “I know
you’re being a good listener if your hands are empty and your eyes are on me,” but I’m definitely
Lindsay Kaye Ohlert
CI 5699 Video Observation, Fall 2009
Page 6 of 9
controlling the room, definitely the dominant presence, definitely in the driver’s seat. The
students have no say about what topics will be discussed or what activities will be done; I even
control how they will respond to questions by what I ask and how I phrase them. That’s not how
I prefer to be a facilitator, to connect students with excellent resources, draw out their
existing knowledge, encourage them to explore new ideas, express themselves, generally become
versatile, self-directed learners. At previous teaching jobs, I considered some of my best lessons
ones where I barely spoke other than to prompt students to expand on their own statements or
share their discoveries. But the thing about “facilitating” is that it requires time, flexibility, and a
close knowledge of the students, and those are all things in short supply for me as a student
teacher in this placement. I’ve spent less than 10 hours total with several of these kids over my
time at Phalen Lake, and since I’m not active in all their homerooms nor present for lunch,
recess, nor extracurriculars, I’ve had no opportunity to get to know them outside of Intervention
time. The content and day-to-day scheduling of the curriculum is mandated, and I am required to
follow it closely. To keep on track, pacing must be tight and diversions must be rare. So I’ve
had to step into a different role. It’s a good thing that I can wear multiple hats, particularly as
there’s a chance I’ll end up working at a school where the teachers don’t have much leeway, but
I suspect part of my tight control of the room here also stems from my preconceived
notions about young children. I am accustomed to working with older kids, and I’ve found that
the more personal responsibility, the more freedom to act on their personal volition, they have,
the more responsibly they behave – as long as there’s a framework of clear expectations already
in place. But with young children, I don’t have a good sense of how much self-control they can
Lindsay Kaye Ohlert
CI 5699 Video Observation, Fall 2009
Page 7 of 9
be expected to exercise, nor how capable they are of making rational choices. So I may be erring
What can I do to change this? Should I even do anything to change it? After all, I am
meeting the school’s expectations, and the kids are making demonstrable progress toward the
stated expectations. And phonics really is not a topic that lends itself well to outside-the-box
thinking. Perhaps it’s possible to give the students more choice without going outside the
Mondo scope and sequence – for example, I could set up multiple stations with approved
activities that got at the mandated knowledge and skills, and have them pick which they’d prefer.
But that’s a band-aid solution, as it doesn’t get at the essentially lacking element here, which is
In the end, I think I simply have to resign myself to wearing the boss-lady hat for now.
But maybe that’s a good thing – my time fully embracing the role of benevolent dictator should
make me more cognizant of the manipulative behaviors I engage in and the decisions I make for
observing how compliant my classes were, once jokingly told me that I had a “cult of
personality.” In the future, I need to be aware of my tendency toward this – it’s certainly not a
bad thing to shape student behaviors subtly, but I must be careful that I am not doing so in ways
classroom management and my demeanor. This was gratifying, but not terribly useful, other
than to reinforce what I already know about my strengths – I’m good at establishing routines,
Lindsay Kaye Ohlert
CI 5699 Video Observation, Fall 2009
Page 8 of 9
I’m very positive when interacting with students, and my classes tend to run smoothly. Also,
honestly, I can’t take much credit for these kids’ good behavior; they’re quite easy to work with
– enthusiastic, amiable, cooperative. Even the few who have some recurring behavioral issues
are just so nice that it’s usually easy to get them to go along with what I want them to do. That
said, there was one piece of positive feedback that I found quite reassuring, which was that my
speech was easily understandable – I had been concerned that I was talking too fast, or that my
accent (which I have been working for years to improve) might interfere with the conveyance of
the phonics instruction, particularly the “th” sound, which can be a bit problematic for me. I will
ESL teacher to model a good example, but it is good to know that I needn’t make it my highest
Two particularly useful suggestions I intend to employ immediately are using more
frequent individual checks for understanding – I used a lot of choral responses and kinesthetic
responses, which the kids can fudge – and connecting the phonics instruction to the students’
immediate, concrete reality (for example, “What in this room has a name that begins with the /sh/
sound?”). The first is apt advice, especially considering what I observed about my “mimic”
student in Part Two of this reflection, and the second both builds on what’s developmentally
appropriate for students this age and could serve to give the impersonal Mondo lesson plans a bit
There was one comment I thought carefully about but ultimately decided isn’t
particularly applicable. In the video, when I have the students begin their “post” activity, they
start working silently to find the /k/ phonemes rather than reading aloud like I wanted them to,
until I remind them that they should be talking. My cohort-mate suggested that this may indicate
Lindsay Kaye Ohlert
CI 5699 Video Observation, Fall 2009
Page 9 of 9
excessively strict conditions in my classroom – i.e., that the kids were reluctant to talk freely –
which is a reasonable concern. However, when these students are with their homeroom teachers,
they’re usually expected to be totally silent when doing worksheets, and the read-aloud was
printed at the bottom of a worksheet. I assume that they were carrying over behavioral norms
from their other classes; once I reminded them that it was a partner read-aloud, they jumped
My first year teaching, I came to the conclusion that it’s better to conduct an ordinary
lesson for peer and administrator observations, rather than trying to put on a dog-and-pony show;
you get the most accurate, most useful feedback that way, and dog-and-pony shows tend to fall
flat anyway. My experience with this video presentation reinforced that; I videotaped a typical
daily lesson that displayed this group’s typical behavior, and so the feedback I received is