I. Introduction
There are over 2 million adults who provide child care for approximately 11 million children under the
age of six in the United States. Caring for children is one of the few professions in which practitioners
may begin working with “clientele” (that is, young children) with little or no pre-service training. Pre-
service training requirements are left entirely to state regulation, and most states have few, if any,
requirements for child care workers before they begin caring for children1.
Many child care providers have only a high-school education; many do not even have that and some
states do not require it2. A recent study (Burton, Whitebook, Young, Brandon, & Maher, 2002) found that
about 20 percent of center teachers, 43 percent of center assistant teachers, and 44 percent of family child
care (FCC) providers have a high school education or less. Also, most caregivers have had little or no
training in how to care for children before they start work, and most states have no requirements for pre-
service training. Only 10 states currently have any such requirement for family child care providers, and
only 13 have pre-service requirements for child care staff in a center3. Several other states have
established requirements to be completed within the first several months or a year of initial employment.
These training requirements range from 6 clock hours of training (required of family child care providers
in Delaware) to the Child Development Associate credential (required of center teachers in the District of
Columbia). The Department of Defense requires 40 hours of pre-service orientation training. All told,
only 25 states require pre-licensing or pre-service training or training within a short time of hire, either for
1
NACCRRA, 2007. We Can Do Better: NACCRRA’s Ranking of State Child Care Center Standards and Oversight.
2
Ibidem.
3
National Child Care Information Center, 2006. http://nccic.acf.hhs.gov
Minimum Pre-Service Training Proposal-DRAFT
family child care providers or center teachers. These requirements are summarized in the Appendix to this
paper.4
Research has clearly established the link between training and higher-quality child care. For example, one
such study (Kaplan & Conn, 1984) found that after completing 20 hours of training, child care center staff
showed improved care-giving skills, such as attention to children, providing activities to enhance the
children’s social development, and improving the classroom environment and educational materials. In
another study (Rhodes & Hennessy, 2000) that assessed the impact of training for center-based providers
with similar levels of education and experience, providers who completed a 120-hour training over a 24-
week period showed greater sensitivity, more positive relationships with children and less detachment
than their peers who had not completed the training. Another study that focused on the value of training
(Burchinal, 2002) found that family child care providers who reporting attending any training workshops
had higher scores on an assessment of global quality (the Family Day Care Rating Scale). These providers
were also less detached from the children. Notably, training was shown to be more strongly associated
with quality than were other factors such as experience, group size or adult: child ratio.
NACCRRA advocates the adoption of a minimum standard for pre-service training, for all child-care
workers caring for at least one unrelated child for pay, before working with children. The adoption of this
standard is the first of 12 key recommendations from NACCRRA’s 2007 report on training for the child
care workforce5. It is clear that additional training can help bridge the gap to prepare child care workers
for the unique needs of their young charges. There is strong public support for such a requirement.
NACCRRA’s 2005 parent poll showed that parents overwhelmingly endorsed basic training for child care
providers. Nearly all of the parents in the poll (95%) favored requiring training before child care
providers work with children. Parents told us that the most important areas for training included first
aid/CPR, child development, discipline, child behavior, working with children with special needs,
communicating with parents, and age-specific courses.
A small number of states have established training requirements that can serve as models for a standard of
minimum pre-service training. These may include a set number of clock hours, specific training courses
4
National Child Care Information Center, 2006. Due to the continually evolving landscape of state-level child care
regulations, some states’ requirements may have changed since that date.
5
NACCRRA, 2007. NACCRRA’s National Survey of Child Care Resource & Referral Training: Building a Training
System for the Child Care Workforce.
Page 2 of 14--NACCRRA
Minimum Pre-Service Training Proposal-DRAFT
approved by the state, a set of standardized modules, or a Child Development Associate (CDA)
credential. The examples highlighted below all mandate approximately 40 hours of training, and share a
common set of required topics covering child development, appropriate practice, and health and safety
issues. NACCRRA recommends that a standardized minimum pre-service training requirement
incorporate elements from these models.
Florida requires a 40-hour Introduction to Child Care training course for child care center personnel.
Child care workers are also required to pass a competency exam and take an additional 5 clock hours in
early language and literacy development. The course is broken into Part I (30 hours, required of center
staff and family child care providers) and Part II (required only for center staff). Center staff have up to
90 days to enroll in the course and 1 year to complete it, while family child care providers must complete
the Part I course BEFORE being registered or licensed. Part I of the training totals 30 hours. For Part II,
an additional 10 hours must be completed, drawing from a list of permitted courses covering more
specialized topics. See below for an outline of these requirements. Coursework is offered online and is
administered by the state, as is the required competency exam.
Wisconsin requires both family child care providers and child care center personnel to complete the
equivalent of a minimum of 40 hours of entry-level training in order to work with children. Several
options are available to fulfill this requirement, including college credits, a CDA, and others. All entry-
level requirements must be completed within 6 months of licensure for FCC providers; however, child
care teachers must complete the requirement before beginning work with children. One option to
complete the training requirement is through state-approved non-credit courses, offered by community
agencies and technical colleges.
The Department of Defense requires all individuals who will care for children to complete an orientation
course that covers child development, health and safety practices, regulations and procedures, appropriate
learning activities and environments, and professionalism and communicating with parents. In addition,
prospective caregivers must complete training in child abuse identification, reporting, and prevention. An
additional 24 hours of annual training is required for each staff. The additional training includes the
Caring for Children Training Modules, all of which must be completed by 18 months after hire. The
training requirements are summarized below.
Page 3 of 14--NACCRRA
Minimum Pre-Service Training Proposal-DRAFT
NACCRRA recommends that all caregivers caring for at least one unrelated child for pay, on a regular
basis, be required to complete a minimum of 40 hours of pre-service training, before beginning
unsupervised work with children. This proposal outlines a minimum standard of training that emphasizes
basic health and safety practices and an understanding of children’s development. The proposal is
designed to support the content areas of the CDA credential, as a means of promoting continuing
professional development for caregivers. This training would not replace ongoing annual training
requirements, but would be an entry point for new caregivers. The training proposed would include
components that are standard for both family child care providers and child care center workers, as well
as training tailored to the setting (FCC providers vs. center staff).
The minimum training outlined here includes 16 hours in health and safety and 16 hours in child
development and guidance. An additional 8 hours would be completed in topics appropriate to the care
setting. This structure is based on the principle that a basic understanding of safety standards, child
development, and appropriate developmental practices are essential for all new child care providers
regardless of the care setting. However, some basic professional skills are necessary for family child care
providers, as small-business owners, while others are more important for center staff, who typically work
in a classroom environment and are supported by a director. Drawing on the models described above,
training should be drawn from the following topics:
Page 4 of 14--NACCRRA
Minimum Pre-Service Training Proposal-DRAFT
Page 5 of 14--NACCRRA
Minimum Pre-Service Training Proposal-DRAFT
As this proposal has been developed in consultation with stakeholders in the field, several important
considerations have been raised about how such a mandatory training requirement would be
implemented. First among these is the question of which caregivers should be required to complete such
pre-service training. Clearly, child care workers with formal education in early childhood (such as a
degree or CDA) would not be required to complete all pre-service training, but rather those subjects such
as . In fact, many states have adopted a plan in which training requirements may be fulfilled by any of
several options, including college credits, a CDA, a high school vocational course, or a non-credit training
course.
In addition, careful thought should be given to whether this pre-service training requirement would apply
not only to workers in child care centers and family child care home settings, but also summer camps,
after-school programs, and “babysitters” who care for children during the summer or on weekends.
Furthermore, it will be important to resolve the question of whether workers who are always supervised
by another worker when in contact with children (e.g., an assistant teacher) should be required to receive
this training. This issue should be clearly defined before a standard requirement is finalized. NACCRRA
has taken the position that child care should be regulated for situations where a person is caring for at
least one other unrelated child on a regular basis for pay.
A related issue is whether this pre-service training should be completed before a worker is hired by an
employer, completed before having contact with children, or completed within some reasonable period of
time while working with children under supervision of a worker who has met the requirement.
NACCRRA supports having workers complete the training within a short time period (such as 90 days
from first hire) as long as they are directly supervised by a caregiver who has already met the training
requirement.
It is also important to articulate several related questions regarding “ownership” of the training: whether
the pre-service training is to be provided by the employer, whose responsibility it is to cover the costs of
the training, and whether the training would “follow” the worker to another employer when changing
jobs. NACCRRA recommends that training be considered the responsibility of the worker, and that
documentation of this training should be adequate to allow the training to transfer when workers change
jobs. A competency assessment such as a knowledge exam at the end of training, accompanied by a
certificate of completion, would permit this “portability”.
Page 6 of 14--NACCRRA
Minimum Pre-Service Training Proposal-DRAFT
In addition, NACCRRA recognizes that existing systems and training curricula are already available, with
training currently provided by community colleges, community agencies such as CCR&Rs, and many
large private employers. These existing systems are an asset that should be maximized to support pre-
service training. Important issues to consider include verification of training courses and systems to
ensure they are meeting the training framework. It would also be important to support systems to help
connect providers to the training they need through a variety of formats and settings. It would also be
essential to establish a period of time (such as 2-5 years) for states to create and/or expand their training
infrastructure to meet additional training needs, before a pre-service training requirement goes into effect.
Finally, NACCRRA emphasizes its support of public investment in training the child care workforce.
NACCRRA is actively working to support the reauthorization of the Child Care Development Block
Grant, and calls for an increase in the amount of funds for the quality set-aside. Strengthening the child-
care workforce should be an important priority for the use of quality set-aside funds. An increase in the
pre-service training requirement would require appropriate funding and should be part of a broad national
strategy to improve quality.
V. Summary/Conclusion
Establishing a minimum pre-service training requirement for child care workers is expected to yield a
wide range of benefits at many levels. Children will clearly benefit from the improvements in the quality
of care-giving they receive. There will be public health benefits such as reductions in the spread of
communicable disease, injuries and deaths from preventable accidents as well as SIDS, and child abuse
and neglect. Implementing such a requirement will also yield benefits for parents, for the centers who
employ child care workers, and for the caregivers themselves. Parents will benefit from the additional
peace of mind knowing that their children are in the care of professional caregivers who are prepared and
qualified to care for their children. The instability and frequent turnover that are features of so many
child care arrangements will likely be reduced by a minimum entry-level training requirement, and this
greater stability will have a positive effect on parental employment and productivity.
Parents will also benefit from caregivers sharing their knowledge, which can improve parents’ ability to
care for their own children and promote their children’s well-being and development. Employers of child
care workers will benefit from reduced turnover among workers who are better prepared to face the
challenges of caring for young children and better trained to provide high-quality care. Finally, caregivers
Page 7 of 14--NACCRRA
Minimum Pre-Service Training Proposal-DRAFT
will benefit from additional preparation to carry out one of the most important jobs in our society: caring
for young and children and helping to prepare them to enter school. The introduction of a standard of
minimum training for entry-level caregivers will help caregivers to embark on a career ladder, advance
their professional skills, achieve better wages, and treat child care as the vitally important professional
role that it is.
The need for a minimum standard of pre-service training for child care workers has already been
recognized in the states that have already implemented or are considering introducing minimum training
requirements. NACCRRA applauds these efforts and calls for policymakers and professionals in the field
to develop a consensus on content and how best to implement a standard minimum pre-service training
requirement nationwide, for both family child care providers and child care center workers. NACCRRA is
working directly with stakeholders and experts in the care and education of young children to develop this
consensus.
The introduction of a minimum standard of pre-service training requirement for child-care workers will
yield important benefits for children, parents, employers and caregivers. The time for this important step
has arrived--the nation’s children deserve no less.
Page 8 of 14--NACCRRA
Minimum Pre-Service Training Proposal-DRAFT
APPENDIX
Page 9 of 14--NACCRRA
Minimum Pre-Service Training Proposal-DRAFT
Page 10 of 14--NACCRRA
Minimum Pre-Service Training Proposal-DRAFT
Page 11 of 14--NACCRRA
Minimum Pre-Service Training Proposal-DRAFT
Page 12 of 14--NACCRRA
Minimum Pre-Service Training Proposal-DRAFT
Note: This information is taken from summaries provided by the National Child Care Information Center as of 2006. Some state’s regulations may have changed
since then; NACCRRA welcomes any updates or feedback to this information. Note that licensing thresholds and definitions of family child care home and
Page 13 of 14--NACCRRA
Minimum Pre-Service Training Proposal-DRAFT
large/group family child care home are not consistent across states. Readers should refer directly to state regulations for definitive information on state
requirements.
Page 14 of 14--NACCRRA