DQG5LWXDOLQ7KLUWHHQWK&HQWXU\)UDQFHE\'RQQD/
6DGOHUUHYLHZ
Kristine Tanton
328
REVIEWS
REVIEWS
329
the royal court of Louis IX. Through an analysis of the sculpture in relation to
the cathedrals role as a coronation church, Sadler draws parallels between the
form and content of the verso sculpture and the bishoprics political role as
king-maker. One of the main points of the book is that the subject matter
depicted sculpturally at the reverse faade promoted interdependence between
ecclesiastical and royal arms of power (12). Sadler notes that the decoration of
a Gothic cathedral such as Reims was by no means a monolithic program, but a
collection of multiple meanings for many audiences. She identifies the reverse
faade program as a primer in moral behavior that had value for a wide
spectrum of audiences ranging from kings to tavern owners.
The book begins by addressing the history of the cathedral, its architectural
antecedents, and the sculptures iconography. Significantly, Sadler explores
how the storied past of Reims continued to inspire the sculptural program of the
cathedral. Noting that the cathedrals iconographic program is encyclopedic in
scope, Sadler determines that there is an emphasis on the theme of coronation
in the celestial and terrestrial realms. Christ is the main subject of Reims
Cathedral, and as the site of the kings coronation, the cathedrals sculpture
highlighted the kings co-regency with Christ. Sadler argues that through the
iconography of the cathedral the archbishops of Reims forged an alliance
between throne and altar, and fostered the notion that the ecclesiastical
blessing at Reims was simply required for royal power (20). By juxtaposing
images of Christs life, death, and resurrection, images of Old Testament kings
and biblical heroes, and images of the baptism of Clovis and a gallery of kings,
the sculptural program emphasized the mission of the French ruler to establish
the Christian kingdom on earth as a necessary prelude to the Second Coming.
Sadler goes on to explore the iconography of the sumptuously carved
reverse faade as a complement to the overall program of the cathedral in the
books second chapter. She notes that although the verso supplements the story
told on the west faade, it also stands on its own. The story of the Virgin and
John the Baptist is depicted with particular emphasis on the moments when
their lives intersect with the life of Christ. Sadler argues that the sculpted
figures of John the Baptist and Melchisedek, which are depicted performing
priestly duties, underlined the significance of the archbishops of Reims in the
role of king-making. She identifies the sculpture as functioning as a
sophisticated piece of ecclesiastical pedagogy directed to the neophyte king
(69). The overall iconographic program of the cathedral underscored the
presence of Christ in the generation of spiritual and temporal power, and the
sculpture on the reverse faade provided the king lessons in kingship.
One of the most compelling arguments that Sadler makes is in the next
chapter, in which she argues that the reverse faade of Reims should be
considered through the lens of the Mirror of Princes and the game of chess,
both of which were used to instruct kings in the ways of royal behavior. She
notes that Hincmar of Reims considered sculpted Old Testament kings and
their prophets as exempla for the newly anointed king. Building upon her
earlier observation that the archbishops of Reims actively promoted their
importance in the coronation ceremony, she considers the crucial role that
Hincmar played in aligning French monarchs with David, Solomon, and
Clovis. In his consecration ordines at Reims for Carolingian rulers, Hincmar
330
REVIEWS
REVIEWS
331
meaning. This book has tremendous value for not only students of medieval
sculpture but also for those interested in the history of Reims Cathedral.
KRISTINE TANTON, Art History, University of Southern California
David A. Salomon, An Introduction to the Glossa Ordinaria as Medieval
Hypertext (Cardiff: University of Wales Press 2012) xii + 128 pp.
David A. Salomons short monograph is four parts survey to one part
manifesto. His primary goalone excellently achievedis to craft a new
theory of medieval reading that depends on the idea of the hyperlink to
understand the processes of textual engagement. He bases his claims on the
complex rubrication of the Glossa Ordinaria as well as the long, somewhat
messy, history of medieval theories of reading from Augustine, through Hugh
of St. Victor, to Mary Carruthers and beyond, to digital theorists like Ted
Nelson. Is this a book on digital humanities? Yes and no. It does not demand an
online, hyperlinked Glossa Ordinaria (although I suspect Salomon would
approve of such an intimidatingly large project). It does not include a related
web resource, and it does not document digitization processes. But it does
inquire into modern theories of hyperlinked reading, asking how the idea of the
hypertext might help us think through medieval texts and the reader-responses
they crafthow, in other words, digital theory can illuminate the book and
reading cultures of the medieval and early modern eras.
Hyperlink, as Solomon articulates it, is an abstract and cognitive concept
Associative thinking, the basic building block of hypertext, is a
characteristic of the mind, not of the page or the screen (95). I might quibble
at the term hyperlink, preferring instead that we expand our definition of
allusionbut that is rather beside the point, as Salomons definition pushes
past the modern conceptions of hypertext as exclusive to electronic media and
based in a physical, computerized text composed of a network. Instead,
Solomon extends hypertext to the level of cognitive theory: it empowers the
reader with freedom of choice, the freedom to explore the text at hand and
depends on the ability of the medieval reader to utilize the many tools he
possesses, not least of which is memory (94). Salomon is advocating for a new
model of understanding medieval reading and medieval thought processes.
Doing so, however, requires very few pages on hyperlink theory itself: of the
99 pages of text (excluding the index and bibliography), only the last seven are
explicitly devoted to the relevance of digital theories for understanding the
cognitive processes of reading in Middle Ages. A weakness? Not quite:
Salomon is clear on his goals: to provide the reader with a primer on the
Glossa Ordinaria, including its history, and then to discuss its relationship to
modern hypertext theory (4).
To call the first ninety-two pages of Salomons text a primer, however, is
rather disingenuous: it is much more than that. The first chapter, The Glossing
Tradition and the Glossa Ordinaria, provides an excellent introduction to the
practices of interactive reading and textual annotation, and would be useful on
its own for graduate-level courses on medieval manuscripts, the history of the
book, or medieval theories of reading. Chapter 2, History, the Text, and the
History of the Text surveys the Glossa Ordinarias history through the Middle
Ages and into the early modern era. In its earliest manuscript versions, the