System Dynamics
2/9/15
1-1
2/9/15
1-2
2/9/15
1-3
2/9/15
1-4
2/9/15
1-5
2/9/15
1-6
2/9/15
1-7
2/9/15
1-8
2/9/15
1-9
u
u
2/9/15
1-10
2/9/15
1-11
2/9/15
1-12
2/9/15
1-13
2/9/15
1-14
2/9/15
1-15
u
u
2/9/15
1-16
2/9/15
1-17
2/9/15
1-18
2/9/15
1-19
2/9/15
1-20
2/9/15
1-21
2/9/15
1-22
2/9/15
1-23
u
u
2/9/15
1-24
2/9/15
1-25
2/9/15
1-26
2/9/15
1-27
2/9/15
Map
as
of
12/31/1999
2,472
total
capacity
1-28
2/9/15
Map
as
of
9/30/2014
62,300
total
capacity
1-29
2/9/15
1-30
2/9/15
These numbers are from the Canadian Wind Energy AssociaPon as of January 2015
1-31
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
2/9/15
A
Solar
Field
B
Thermal
Energy
Storage
Hot
&
Cold
Tanks
C
Heat
Transfer
Fluid
Expansion
Vessels
D
Heat
Transfer
Fluid
Pumps
E
Heat
Transfer
Fluid
Supply
Headers
F
Solar
Steam
Generators
G
Steam
Turbines
&
Generators
H
OperaPons
Control
Building
I
Cooling
Towers
J
Switchyards
K
Water/Wastewater
Treatment
Systems
L
Firewater/Cooling
Tower
Make-up
Tank
M
EvaporaPon
Ponds
N
Raw
Water
Tank
The
Solana
StaPon
is
a
280
MW
concentrated
solar
power
(CSP)
project
located
about
70
miles
southwest
of
Phoenix
near
Gila
Bend,
Arizona
The
staPon
will
interconnect
at
230
kV
with
the
APS
system
Operates
by
using
a
parabolic
trough
system
to
concentrate
energy
from
the
sun
using
long
curved
mirrors
Approximately
2,700
trough
collectors
covering
roughly
1,757
acres
comprise
the
solar
eld
The
trough
systems
focus
sunlight
on
a
pipe
running
through
the
center
of
the
trough
Heat
warms
a
synthePc
oil
(heat
transfer
uid
up
to
735)
which
ows
through
the
pipe
to
the
power
island
The
heat
transfer
uid
serves
as
the
working
uid
of
the
collector
eld
&
provides
a
means
for
transferring
the
collected
solar
energy
to
the
heat
exchangers
The
collected
solar
energy
is
used
to
convert
water
to
steam
for
use
in
a
convenPonal
steam
turbine
generator
1-32
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
2/9/15
A
Solar
Field
B
Thermal
Energy
Storage
Hot
&
Cold
Tanks
C
Heat
Transfer
Fluid
Expansion
Vessels
D
Heat
Transfer
Fluid
Pumps
E
Heat
Transfer
Fluid
Supply
Headers
F
Solar
Steam
Generators
G
Steam
Turbines
&
Generators
H
OperaPons
Control
Building
I
Cooling
Towers
J
Switchyards
K
Water/Wastewater
Treatment
Systems
L
Firewater/Cooling
Tower
Make-up
Tank
M
EvaporaPon
Ponds
N
Raw
Water
Tank
The
Solana
StaPon
is
a
280
MW
concentrated
solar
power
(CSP)
project
located
about
70
miles
southwest
of
Phoenix
near
Gila
Bend,
Arizona
The
staPon
will
interconnect
at
230
kV
with
the
APS
system
Operates
by
using
a
parabolic
trough
system
to
concentrate
energy
from
the
sun
using
long
curved
mirrors
Approximately
2,700
trough
collectors
covering
roughly
1,757
acres
comprise
the
solar
eld
The
trough
systems
focus
sunlight
on
a
pipe
running
through
the
center
of
the
trough
Heat
warms
a
synthePc
oil
(heat
transfer
uid
up
to
735)
which
ows
through
the
pipe
to
the
power
island
The
heat
transfer
uid
serves
as
the
working
uid
of
the
collector
eld
&
provides
a
means
for
transferring
the
collected
solar
energy
to
the
heat
exchangers
The
collected
solar
energy
is
used
to
convert
water
to
steam
for
use
in
a
convenPonal
steam
turbine
generator
1-33
2/9/15
1-34
2/9/15
1-35
2/9/15
1-36
2/9/15
1-37
2/9/15
1-38
2/9/15
1-39
2/9/15
1-40
2/9/15
The
connecPons
for
a
synchroscope
within
the
power
system
are
illustrated
above
Note
the
two
PTs
used
to
input
the
2
voltage
waves
to
the
scope
u Also
note
the
25
relay
A
25
relay
is
a
synchronizing
relay
u A
synchronizing
relay
will
not
allow
the
circuit
breaker
to
close
unPl
the
angle
across
the
open
circuit
breaker
is
less
than
a
selectable
value
u
u
1-41
2/9/15
1-42
2/9/15
Once
the
rst
circuit
breaker
is
closed,
the
frequency
is
the
same
in
the
enPre
power
system
u However,
the
other
two
synchronizing
variables
must
be
within
reasonable
limits
before
the
second
breaker
closing
u
1-43
2/9/15
A
governor
control
system
is
used
to
control
the
speed
of
the
generator
rotaPng
sha^
u The
governor
adjusts
a
valve
posiPon
as
the
sha^
speed
changes
The
valve
controls
the
fuel
ow
u Governors
are
a
source
of
primary
frequency
control
which
is
also
called
frequency
response
u
1-44
2/9/15
An
excitaPon
control
system
is
used
to
control
the
MVar
output
of
the
generator
The
voltage
regulator
monitors
the
unit
output
voltage
&
sends
an
error
signal
to
the
exciter
u The
exciter
controls
the
amount
of
eld
current
that
ows
to
the
generators
eld
winding
u
u
1-45
2/9/15
The
graphic
above
illustrates
the
three
major
InterconnecPons
of
North
America
NERC
includes
the
Hydro
Quebec
InterconnecPon
as
part
of
the
Eastern
InterconnecPon
u Approximate
peak
load
of
the
major
InterconnecPons
East
650,000
MW
West
160,000
MW
ERCOT
70,000
MW
Hydro
Quebec
35,000
MW
u
1-46
u
u
2/9/15
1-47
2/9/15
1-48
2/9/15
1-49
2/9/15
1-50
2/9/15
1-51
u
u
2/9/15
1-52
u
u
2/9/15
1-53
2/9/15
1-54
2/9/15
The
US
Government
has
invested
a
large
amount
of
money
in
a
program
called
the
Smart
Grid
Investment
Grant
or
SGIG
Many
uPliPes
have
provided
matching
funds
1-55
2/9/15
1-56
2/9/15
1-57
2/9/15
1-58
2/9/15
1-59
2/9/15
The
equaPons
above
use
the
equaPons
of
the
previous
page
to
nd
sending
(SS)
&
receiving
(SR)
end
complex
power
(P
+
Q)
u The
symbol
(^)
is
for
the
conjugate
A
conjugate
is
a
mathemaPcal
operaPon
to
keep
the
signs
of
P
&
Q
correct
u
1-60
2/9/15
Using
standard
methods
(sin
/
cosine
conversion)
for
switching
between
the
rectangular
and
polar
coordinate
frames
the
equaPons
of
the
previous
page
are
separated
into
acPve
(P)
&
reacPve
(Q)
components
Sending
end
posiPve
powers
are
out
of
bus
&
into
line
Receiving
end
posiPve
powers
are
out
of
line
&
into
bus
1-61
2/9/15
1-62
2/9/15
We
will
only
use
the
sending
end
equaPons
from
this
point
forward
You
should
memorize
these
two
equaPons
1-63
2/9/15
1-64
2/9/15
Generators
produce
MW
&
MVar
&
the
power
ows
to
the
loads
Seems
simple
but
somePmes
we
forget
simple
things
u High
voltages
means
lower
u High
impedance
means
greater
u System
equipment
(like
a
PST)
can
impact
MW
ow
u
1-65
2/9/15
1-66
2/9/15
3 PST photograph
1-67
2/9/15
Diagram
above
illustrates
transformer
with
delta
winding
on
le^
&
wye
winding
on
right
u Delta
coil
1
is
magnePcally
linked
(on
same
core)
as
wye
coil
4
Coil
2
with
coil
5
Coil
3
with
coil
6
u Polarity
marks
(red
X)
note
polarity
relaPonships
of
coils
Delta
coil
1
from
polarity
to
non-polarity
is
in
phase
with
wye
coil
4
from
polarity
to
non-polarity
u Note
phaser
diagrams
below
transformer
diagram
Voltage
from
VA-N
on
delta
side
leads
voltage
from
VA-N
on
wye
side
by
30
Voltage
from
VB-N
on
delta
side
leads
voltage
from
VB-N
on
wye
side
by
30
Voltage
from
VC-N
on
delta
side
leads
voltage
from
VC-N
on
wye
side
by
30
u
1-68
2/9/15
1-69
2/9/15
1-70
2/9/15
1-71
2/9/15
1-72
2/9/15
1-73
2/9/15
In
le^
side
diagram
(A)
above
Line
#2
is
open
with
a
40
angle
across
CB
#2
Angle
across
CB
#2
is
representaPve
of
MW
that
will
ow
once
CB
#2
is
closed
u To
reduce
this
angle
you
must
reduce
ow
that
would
occur
once
CB
#2
is
closed
u PSTs
are
a
powerful
tool
for
this
purpose
u Right
side
diagram
illustrates
how
PST
in
Line
#1
can
be
used
to
reduce
ow
on
parallel
path
Thus
reducing
angle
across
CB
#2
u Angle
across
parallel
path
is
same
as
angle
across
the
open
CB
#2
u Note
that
while
angle
across
line
#2
gets
smaller
Angle
across
Line
@1
gets
larger
u PST
can
be
viewed
as
intenPonally
creaPng
a
circulaPng
ow
This
circulaPng
ow
is
illustrated
in
right
side
(B)
diagram
above
u CirculaPng
ow
unloads
parallel
path
&
further
loads
Line
#1
u
1-74
2/9/15
1-75
2/9/15
1-76
2/9/15
1-77
2/9/15
1-78
2/9/15
1-79
2/9/15
1-80
2/9/15
Added
receiving-end
circle
diagram
to
previous
page
graphic
to
obtain
the
gure
above
u Both
sending-end
&
receiving-end
illustrate
a
power
angle
of
70
u
1-81
u
u
2/9/15
1-82
2/9/15
1-83
2/9/15
Raise
to
40
Note
power
ows
in
boHom
right
of
gure
These
were
obtained
from
the
power-circle
diagram
above
u Note
the
large
MW
changes
as
a
result
of
the
angle
changes
u Note
the
Mvar
ows
are
not
balanced
This
is
due
to
uneven
voltage
levels
coupled
with
innite
buses
u Innite
bus
means
bus
will
supply
whatever
amount
of
MVar
needed
to
keep
voltage
constant
Mvar
ows
are
measured
at
bus
Lower
voltage
on
right
side
(340
kV)
produces
less
MVar
from
natural
capacitance
so
more
Mvar
must
be
drawn
from
the
bus
to
meet
needs
of
line
u
u
1-84
2/9/15
Raise
to
86
PMAX
into
receiving
end
occurs
at
86,
not
90
The
angle
of
maximum
power
transfer
is
the
impedance
angle
of
the
transfer
path
This
angle
is
always
less
than
90
degrees
due
to
resistance
of
the
transfer
path
u Note
dierent
angle
for
PMAX
at
sending
&
receiving
ends
u
u
1-85
2/9/15
1-86
2/9/15
NERC
states
that
no
maMer
what
the
opera0ng
security
limit
is
calculated
to
be,
under
no
circumstances
may
a
transmission
operators
net
schedule
across
a
transmission
path
exceed
the
physical
capability
of
the
transmission
path
1-87
2/9/15
1-88
2/9/15
1-89
2/9/15
PTDF
Power
Transfer
DistribuPon
Factor
In
the
pre-conPngency
conguraPon
of
a
system
under
study,
a
measure
of
the
responsiveness
or
change
in
electrical
loadings
on
transmission
system
faciliPes
due
to
a
change
in
electric
power
transfer
from
one
area
to
another,
expressed
in
percent
(up
to
100%)
of
the
change
in
power
transfer
1-90
2/9/15
1-91
u
u
u
2/9/15
The
PTDF
of
10%
in
the
previous
page
was
the
percentage
of
the
A-to-C
schedule
that
owed
on
the
path
from
A-B-D-C
Lines
A-B,
B-D,
&
D-C
all
have
the
same
10%
PTDF
for
the
schedule
from
A-C
Line
A-C
has
a
PTDF
of
90%
Assume
that
Line
A-B
is
always
overloading
Further
assume
you
want
to
create
a
tool
that
you
can
rapidly
consult
to
determine
what
schedules
would
be
best
curtailed
to
relive
an
overload
on
Line
A-B
A
table,
such
as
the
one
shown
above,
could
be
created
to
show
the
PTDFs
on
Line
A-B
for
various
schedules
For
example,
for
a
schedule
that
sources
at
A
&
sinks
at
C,
10%
of
the
ow
is
across
Line
A-B
This
PTDF
(10%)
is
entered
in
the
table
as
shown
in
large
type
above
To
further
illustrate
the
concept,
what
about
a
100
MW
schedule
that
sources
at
B
&
sinks
at
C,
how
much
of
it
will
ow
on
Line
A-B?
A
schedule
with
a
source
B
&
sink
C
has
two
possible
paths
to
ow
u Path
B-A-C
has
60%
of
the
impedance
&
will
absorb
40%
of
the
ow
u Path
B-D-C
has
40%
of
the
impedance
&
will
absorb
60%
of
the
ow
The
PTDF
for
this
schedule
on
Line
A-B
is
therefore
40%
Note
that
the
40%
is
shown
as
a
negaPve
number
in
the
table
above
The
negaPve
is
because
the
MW
actually
ows
from
bus
B
to
bus
A
on
Line
A-B
u A
negaPve
PTDF
means
that
increasing
the
Source
B
to
sink
C
schedule
would
lower
the
ow
from
A
to
B
1-92
2/9/15
1-93
2/9/15
1-94
2/9/15
1-95
2/9/15
1-96
2/9/15
1-97
2/9/15
1-98
2/9/15
1-99
2/9/15
1-100
2/9/15
1-101
2/9/15
1-102
2/9/15
1-103
2/9/15
1-104
2/9/15
1-105
2/9/15
1-106
2/9/15
1-107
2/9/15
1-108
2/9/15
1-109
2/9/15
Speed
droop
is
the
amount
of
speed
(or
frequency)
change
that
is
necessary
to
cause
the
prime
mover
control
mechanism
(for
example
a
water
valve)
to
move
from
fully
closed
to
fully
open
If
the
speed
droop
is
5%
then
a
5%
change
in
the
turbine
speed
would
moves
valves
from
fully
open
to
closed
or
from
fully
closed
to
open
u Speed
regula0on
is
the
amount
of
speed
or
frequency
change
necessary
to
cause
the
MW
output
of
the
synchronous
generator
to
change
from
zero
output
to
full
output
In
contrast
with
droop,
speed
regulaPon
focuses
on
the
MW
output
of
the
generator,
rather
than
the
posiPon
of
its
valves
u The
gure
above
illustrates
a
5%
speed
regulaPon
curve
For
a
5%
change
in
frequency
(3
Hz),
the
governor
will
move
the
generator
across
its
full
MW
output
range
u From
0
to
rated
or
rated
to
0
u As
frequency
drops,
MW
increases
u As
frequency
rises,
MW
drops
u Industry
pracPce
is
a
droop
of
5%
u
1-110
2/9/15
1-111
2/9/15
1-112
2/9/15
1-113
2/9/15
1-114
2/9/15
1-115
2/9/15
Speed
droop
is
the
amount
of
speed
(or
frequency)
change
that
is
necessary
to
cause
the
prime
mover
control
mechanism
(for
example
a
water
valve)
to
move
from
fully
closed
to
fully
open
If
the
speed
droop
is
5%
then
a
5%
change
in
the
turbine
speed
would
moves
valves
from
fully
open
to
closed
or
from
fully
closed
to
open
u Speed
regula0on
is
the
amount
of
speed
or
frequency
change
necessary
to
cause
the
MW
output
of
the
synchronous
generator
to
change
from
zero
output
to
full
output
In
contrast
with
droop,
speed
regulaPon
focuses
on
the
MW
output
of
the
generator,
rather
than
the
posiPon
of
its
valves
u In
some
cases,
especially
hydro,
the
droop
seang
is
o^en
signicantly
dierent
from
the
resulPng
speed
regulaPon
This
is
due
to
the
nonlinear
relaPonship
between
valve
posiPon
&
water,
gas,
or
steam
ow
through
the
turbine
u To
illustrate
the
dierence
between
speed
droop
&
speed
regulaPon
the
response
of
a
large
(690
MW
raPng)
hydroelectric
generaPng
unit
to
a
system
frequency
disturbance
is
illustrated
in
the
series
of
plots
above
Note
the
iniPal
frequency
drop
from
59.95
to
59.91
Valves
open
an
addiPonal
1%
690
MW
rated
unit
MW
output
moves
from
600
to
610
u See
speed
droop
&
speed
regulaPon
calculaPons
next
page
u
1-116
2/9/15
Speed
droop
of
6.7
%
means
that
it
would
take
a
6.7%
change
in
frequency
to
move
the
control
valve
from
fully
closed
to
fully
open
u Speed
regulaPon
of
4.6
%
means
that
it
would
take
a
4.6%
change
in
frequency
to
move
the
MW
output
from
0
to
690
u
1-117
u
u
2/9/15
1-118
2/9/15
1-119
2/9/15
1-120
u
u
2/9/15
1-121
2/9/15
1-122
u
u
2/9/15
1-123
2/9/15
The
graphic
above
illustrates
the
frequency
response
measure
(FRM)
of
the
Eastern
InterconnecPon
The
FRM
will
change
as
system
condiPons
change
1-124
2/9/15
1-125
2/9/15
1-126
2/9/15
Alberta
Electric
System
Operator
(AESO),
Arizona
Public
Service
Company
(AZPS),
Avista
CorporaPon
(AVA),
BA
of
Northern
California
(BANC),
BPA
Transmission
(BPAT),
BA
Hydro
Authority
(BCHA),
California
ISO
(CISO),
Comisin
Federal
de
Electricidad
(CFE),
Arlington
Valley,
LLC
(DEAA),
El
Paso
Electric
Company
(EPE),
Gila
River
Power,
LP
(GRMA),
Grith
Energy,
LLC
(GRIF),
Idaho
Power
Company
(IPCO),
Imperial
IrrigaPon
District
(IID),
Los
Angeles
Department
of
Water
&
Power
(LDWP),
NaturEner
Power
Watch,
LLC
(GWA),
Nevada
Power
Company
(NEVP),
New
Harquahala
GeneraPng
Company
(HGBA),
Northwestern
Energy
(NWMT),
PaciCorp
East
(PACE),
PaciCorp
West
(PACW),
Portland
General
Electric
Company
(PGE),
Public
Service
Company
of
Colorado
(PSCO),
Public
Service
Company
of
New
Mexico
(PNM),
PUD
No.
1
of
Chelan
County
(CHPD),
PUD
No.
1
of
Douglas
County
(DOPD),
PUD
No.
2
of
Grant
County
(GCPD),
Puget
Sound
Energy
(PSEI),
Salt
River
Project
(SRP),
SeaHle
City
Light
(SCL),
Sierra
Pacic
Power
Company
(SPPC),
City
of
Tacoma
Department
of
Public
UPliPes
(TPWR),
Tucson
Electric
Power
Company
(TEPC),
Turlock
IrrigaPon
District
(TIDC),
WAPA
Colorado-Missouri
Region
(WACM),
WAPA,
Lower
Colorado
Region
(WALC),
WAPA
Upper
Great
Plains
West
(WAUW),
NaturEner
Wind
Watch
(WWA)
1-127
2/9/15
1-128
2/9/15
Inadvertent
interchange
is
the
dierence
between
the
actual
ow
&
the
scheduled
ow
u All
BAs
keep
inadvertent
accounts
for
peak
&
o-peak
periods
u
1-129
2/9/15
1-130
u
u
2/9/15
1-131
2/9/15
1-132
2/9/15
1907
-
1989
Following
graduaPon
from
MIT
joined
Leeds
&
Northrup
Company
where
worked
for
48
years
u Best
known
for
contribuPons
to
control
of
interconnected
power
systems
u Devised
many
of
fundamental
concepts
&
techniques
now
in
widespread
use
for
automaPc
control
of
generaPon
&
power
ow
u Major
contribuPons
included:
Use
of
sustained
frequency
bias
in
generaPon
control
process
Use
of
distributed
frequency
biased
net
interchange
controls
in
all
areas
interconnecPon
for
control
of
bulk
power
transfers
Analysis
of
system
response
that
permits
coordinaPon
of
area
controls
with
inherent
area
governing
characterisPcs
Development
of
combined
feed
forward
&
feedback
computer
control
technique
for
stable
economic
generaPon
allocaPon
Developed
method
for
compuPng
magnitude
of
unscheduled
energy
transfers
caused
by
each
of
parPcipaPng
areas
of
interconnecPon
u
u
1-133
2/9/15
1-134
u
u
2/9/15
1-135
2/9/15
1-136
u
u
2/9/15
1-137
2/9/15
1-138
2/9/15
OperaPng
Reserve
That
capability
above
rm
demand
required
to
provide
for
regulaPon,
load
forecasPng
error,
equipment
forced
&
scheduled
outages
&
local
area
protecPon
OperaPng
Reserve
consists
of
Spinning
&
Non-Spinning
Reserve
OperaPng
Reserve
Spinning
The
porPon
of
OperaPng
Reserve
consisPng
of:
u
GeneraPon
synchronized
to
the
system
&
fully
available
to
serve
load
within
the
Disturbance
Recovery
Period
following
the
conPngency
u
Load
fully
removable
from
the
system
within
the
Disturbance
Recovery
Period
following
the
conPngency
Non-Spinning
Reserve
That
generaPng
reserve
not
connected
to
the
system
but
capable
of
serving
demand
within
a
specied
Pme
InterrupPble
load
that
can
be
removed
from
the
system
in
a
specied
Pme
ConPngency
Reserve
The
provision
of
capacity
deployed
by
the
BA
to
meet
the
DCS
&
other
NERC
&
RRO
conPngency
requirements
RegulaPng
Reserve
An
amount
of
reserve,
responsive
to
AGC,
which
is
sucient
to
provide
normal
regulaPng
margin
OperaPng
Reserve
Supplemental
The
porPon
of
OperaPng
Reserve
consisPng
of:
u
GeneraPon
(synchronized
or
capable
of
being
synchronized
to
the
system)
that
is
fully
available
to
serve
load
within
the
Disturbance
Recovery
Period
following
the
conPngency
event
or
u
Load
fully
removable
from
the
system
within
the
Disturbance
Recovery
Period
following
the
conPngency
event
1-139
2/9/15
Frequency
responsive
reserves
are
automaPcally
(governor,
relay,
etc.)
&
rapidly
(within
seconds)
responsive
to
frequency
deviaPons
1-140
2/9/15
1-141
2/9/15
1-142
2/9/15
1-143
u
u
2/9/15
1-144
2/9/15
1-145
2/9/15
Each
BA
will
calculate
a
Control
Parameter
value
for
each
minute
of
the
day
Procedures
for
calculaPng
control
performance
when
ACE
values
are
not
available
are
described
in
the
NERC
Manual
u The
Control
Parameters
for
each
minute
are
averaged
together
to
determine
the
Control
Parameter
value
for
each
successive
hour
u The
monthly
Control
Parameter
values
are
a
weighted
average
that
are
based
on
the
Control
Performance
magnitudes
from
each
minutes
calculaPon
&
the
number
of
Control
Parameter
values
used
u You
could
calculate
average
Control
Parameter
values
for
any
Pme
period
For
example,
for
the
duraPon
of
a
System
Operators
shi^
u
1-146
2/9/15
The
Compliance
Factor
(CF)
is
determined
by
dividing
the
average
value
of
the
Control
Parameter
by
the
square
of
the
frequency
target
value
(epsilon)
u You
could
calculate
a
Compliance
Factor
for
any
Pme
period
but
the
12
month
sliding
average
is
the
best
indicator
of
overall
control
performance
NERC
will
monitor
one
&
12
month
values
of
the
Compliance
Factor
u The
NERC
Performance
SubcommiHee
will
determine
the
InterconnecPons
epsilon
value
u NERC
uses
the
Compliance
Factor
(which
is
a
raPo)
to
create
a
percentage
formula
for
evaluaPng
control
performance
The
equaPon
NERC
developed
is
shown
on
the
next
slide
u
1-147
2/9/15
The
actual
CPS1
value
that
is
calculated
to
determine
a
BAs
compliance
or
non-
compliance
with
CPS1
is
determined
using
the
Compliance
Factor
(CF)
u This
formula
was
developed
to
state
the
CPS1
value
on
a
percentage
basis
u +100%
is
a
key
value
for
CPS1,
to
comply
with
the
CPS1
standard
a
BA
must
reach
or
exceed
a
12-month
CPS1
value
of
+100%
If
a
BA
achieves
a
12-month
average
CPS1
of
greater
than
or
equal
to
100%
they
pass
CPS1
If
a
BA
achieves
a
12-month
average
CPS1
value
of
less
than
100%
they
fail
CPS1
u Insight
into
CPS1
values:
A
12-month
average
CPS1
value
of
+100%
is
the
minimum
acceptable
performance
&
means
the
BA
is
performing
to
just
meet
the
InterconnecPons
frequency
deviaPon
limits
If
a
BA
has
an
ACE
of
zero
for
a
Pme
period,
it
will
have
a
CPS1
value
of
+200%
for
that
same
Pme
period
u Since,
in
theory
there
is
no
limit
to
the
magnitude
of
ACE,
it
follows
that
there
is
no
limit
to
the
magnitude
of
CPS1
CPS1
could
be
a
very
large
negaPve
or
a
very
large
posiPve
number
u Odds
of
violaPng
CPS2
increase
with
the
size
of
CPS1
u
1-148
2/9/15
1-149
2/9/15
CPS2
states
that
the
average
ACE
value
for
each
ten
minute
period
in
the
hour
shall
not
exceed
a
constant
called
L10
u L10
is
similar
to
the
old
A2
Criterias
Ld
value
However,
L10
is
derived
from
frequency
based
staPsPcal
theory
&
is
technically
defensible
u ExplanaPon
of
terms
used
in
the
equaPon
for
L10:
1.65
is
the
number
of
standard
deviaPons
that
will
result
in
a
90%
probability
of
achieving
the
desired
InterconnecPon
frequency
error
u The
limits
for
the
frequency
error
are
determined
from
the
10
value
The
10
value
is
the
InterconnecPons
allowable
ten-minute
average
frequency
error
Bi
is
a
individual
BAs
frequency
bias
value
BS
is
the
sum
of
the
frequency
bias
values
for
all
the
BAs
in
the
InterconnecPon
u
1-150
u
u
2/9/15
BAs
must
report
their
compliance
level
to
the
standards
on
a
monthly
basis
Note
that
a
BA
must
be
in
compliance
with
the
CPS
during
both
normal
&
disturbance
condiPons
1-151
2/9/15
The
DCS
measures
the
BAs
(or
RSGs)
ability
to
uPlize
its
ConPngency
Reserves
following
a
disturbance
Each
BA
shall
have
access
to
&/or
operate
resources
to
provide
for
a
level
of
ConPngency
Reserve
sucient
to
meet
the
DCS
RSGs
shall
have
the
same
responsibiliPes
as
individual
BAs
with
regards
to
meePng
the
DCS
u An
RSG
shall
be
considered
in
a
disturbance
condiPon
whenever
a
group
member
has
experienced
a
reportable
disturbance
&
calls
for
the
acPvaPon
of
ConPngency
Reserves
u If
a
group
member
has
experienced
a
reportable
disturbance
but
does
not
call
for
reserve
acPvaPon
from
other
members
of
the
RSG,
then
that
member
shall
report
DCS
compliance
as
a
single
BA
u Because
generator
failures
are
far
more
common
than
signicant
losses
of
load
&
because
ConPngency
Reserve
acPvaPon
does
not
typically
apply
to
the
loss
of
load:
The
applicaPon
of
the
DCS
is
limited
to
the
loss
of
generaPon
&
does
not
apply
to
the
loss
of
loads
u BAs
&
RSGs
shall
at
least
annually
review
their
probable
conPngencies
to
determine
their
most
severe
single
conPngencies
u
1-152
2/9/15
The
DCS
states
that
a
BA
(or
RSG)
shall
return
their
ACE
either
to
zero
or
to
its
pre-
disturbance
ACE
value
within
15
minutes
following
a
disturbance
The
logic
for
not
requiring
recovering
to
zero
is
that
DCS
is
a
measure
of
available
ConPngency
Reserves
u The
example
in
the
graphic
below
illustrates
recovery
of
ACE
to
the
pre-
disturbance
value
within
15
minutes
so
the
enPty
is
in
conformance
with
the
DCS
u BAs
(or
RSGs)
must
conform
to
the
DCS
100%
of
the
Pme
u Compliance
to
the
DCS
may
be
demonstrated
by
either
of
the
following
methods:
The
RSG
reviews
the
group
ACE
&
demonstrates
compliance
to
the
DCS
The
RSG
reviews
each
members
ACE
in
response
to
the
acPvaPon
of
reserves
u The
DCS
only
applies
in
disturbance
condiPons
A
key
point
then
is
what
denes
a
reportable
disturbance
condiPon
u The
next
page
denes
a
reportable
disturbance
u
1-153
2/9/15
1-154
u
u
u
2/9/15
MulPple
conPngencies
occurring
within
one
minute
or
less
of
each
other
shall
be
treated
as
a
single
conPngency
If
the
combined
magnitude
of
the
mulPple
conPngencies
exceeds
the
most
severe
single
conPngency,
the
loss
is
reported,
but
is
excludable
from
DCS
compliance
AddiPonal
conPngencies
that
occur
a^er
one
minute
of
the
start
of
a
reportable
disturbance
but
before
the
end
of
the
disturbance
recovery
period
can
also
be
excluded
The
enPty
shall
determine
DCS
compliance
for
the
iniPal
disturbance
by
performing
a
reasonable
esPmaPon
of
the
response
that
would
have
occurred
had
the
second
&
subsequent
conPngencies
not
occurred
AddiPonal
reportable
disturbances
that
occur
a^er
the
end
of
the
disturbance
recovery
period
but
before
the
end
of
the
ConPngency
Reserve
RestoraPon
Period
shall
be
reported
&
included
in
the
compliance
evaluaPon
An
enPty
can
request
a
waiver
from
NERC
if
their
ConPngency
Reserves
were
rendered
inadequate
by
prior
conPngencies
&
a
good
faith
eort
to
replace
reserves
can
be
shown
Each
BA
must
fully
restore
its
ConPngency
Reserves
within
the
ConPngency
Reserve
RestoraPon
Period
for
its
InterconnecPon
The
RestoraPon
Period
begins
at
the
end
of
the
disturbance
recovery
period
The
enPty
shall
restore
its
ConPngency
Reserves
within
90
minutes
This
period
may
be
adjusted
to
beHer
suit
the
reliability
targets
of
the
InterconnecPon
based
on
analysis
approved
by
NERC
1-155
2/9/15
1-156
2/9/15
1-157
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
2/9/15
BAALLow
Low Balancing Authority ACE Limit (MW)
BAALHigh
High Balancing Authority ACE Limit (MW)
10 is a constant to convert
the
frequency
bias
seang
from
MW/0.1
Hz
to
MW/Hz
Bi
Frequency
Bias
Seang
for
a
BA
u Expressed
as
MW/0.1
Hz
FA
Measured
frequency
in
Hz
FS
Scheduled
frequency
in
Hz
FTLLow
Low
frequency
trigger
limit
calculated
as:
FS
-
31I
Hz
FTLHigh
High
frequency
trigger
limit
calculated
as:
FS
+
31I
Hz
1I
Constant
derived
from
a
targeted
frequency
bound
for
each
InterconnecPon
as
follows:
u Eastern
InterconnecPon
=
0.018
Hz
u Western
InterconnecPon
=
0.0228
Hz
u ERCOT
InterconnecPon
=
0.030
Hz
u Quebec
InterconnecPon
=
0.021
Hz
1-158
2/9/15
1-159
2/9/15
1-160
2/9/15
1-161
2/9/15
FormaPon
of
islands
A
is
likely
island
as
it
is
loosely
connected
to
the
rest
of
the
interconnecPon
u A
needs
well
thought
out
UFLS
program
u
u
1-162
2/9/15
1-163
2/9/15
The scheme described above & on the next few pages is called the
coordinated plan
Areas of the WECC may develop an sub-area specific plan
u NWPP has a plan
u Desert Southwest has a plan
u Goal of the coordinated plan is to arrest the frequency decline before
frequency reaches 58.0 Hz & to recover frequency to 59.5 Hz or higher
u Simulation work shows that the coordinated plan will not activate until there
has been a cascading disturbance across multiple entities systems
In addition, none of the WECCs sub-areas will experience an offnominal frequency event due to either single or dual most-severecontingency losses of generation resources if the losses occur within
known island configurations
u
1-164
2/9/15
1-165
2/9/15
Stall
schemes
are
used
to
prevent
frequency
from
stabilizing
at
values
above
the
main
UFLS
seangs
1-166
u
u
2/9/15
1-167
2/9/15
Each
SPP
EnPty
That
Has
A
Peak
Load
100
MW
Shall
Develop
&
Implement
A
UFLS
Program
That
Meets
Following
Requirements:
A
Minimum
Of
10%
Shed
At
Each
UFLS
Step
In
Accordance
With
Table
Above
IntenPonal
Relay
Time
Delay
30
Cycles
Undervoltage
Inhibit
Seang
85%
Of
Nominal
Voltage
u Each
SPP
EnPty
That
Has
A
Peak
Load
<
100
MW
Shall
Develop
&
Implement
A
UFLS
Program
That
Meets
Following
Requirements:
A
Minimum
Of
1
UFLS
Step
With
The
Frequency
Set
Point
As
Assigned
By
The
PC
Minimum
Accumulated
Load
Relief
30%
Of
Peak
Load
u Each
EnPty
ElecPng
To
Use
UF
Islanding
Schemes
Shall
Design
Schemes
To
Operate
A^er
All
3
Steps
Of
UFLS
Have
Been
Exhausted
&
The
Frequency
ConPnues
To
Fall
To
58.5
Hz
Or
Below
For
Islanding
Schemes
Designed
To
Operate
At
Or
Between
58.5
Hz
&
58.0
Hz
Minimum
Time
Delay
2
Seconds
For
Islanding
Schemes
Designed
To
Operate
Below
58.0
Hz
No
Time
Delay
Required
u
1-168
2/9/15
Each
GO
Shall
Verify
That
Their
Generators
Will
Not
Trip
Above
The
Generator
UF
Curve
In
Or
Below
The
OF
Curve
(Illustrated
Above)
As
Result
Of
Units
Frequency
ProtecPve
Relay
Seangs
For Units With Operating Characteristics That Limit Units Ability To
Satisfy Curve The GO Shall Provide Technical Evidence To PC
Demonstrating That Unit Cannot Operate Within Specified Frequency
Range Without Causing Damage Or Violating Manufacturers
Equipment Ratings
1-169
2/9/15
1-170
2/9/15
1-171
2/9/15
Primary
frequency
control
is
the
1ST
stage
of
overall
frequency
control
&
is
the
response
of
resources
&
load
to
a
locally
sensed
change
in
frequency
in
order
to
arrest
that
change
in
frequency
u Primary
frequency
response
is
automaPc,
not
driven
by
any
centralized
system,
&
begins
within
seconds
rather
than
minutes
u NERC
denes
frequency
response
as:
Equipment
u The
immediate
&
automaPc
reacPon
or
response
of
power
from
a
system
or
power
from
elements
of
the
system
to
a
change
in
locally
sensed
system
frequency.
System
u The
sum
of
the
change
in
demand,
&
the
change
in
generaPon,
divided
by
the
change
in
frequency,
expressed
in
MW
per
0.1
hertz
(MW/0.1
Hz)
u Frequency
response
is
a
characterisPc
of
load
&
generaPon
within
BAs
&
interconnecPons
It
reacts
or
responds
with
changes
in
power
to
aHempted
changes
in
load-
resource
balance
that
result
in
changes
to
system
frequency
u Because
the
loss
of
a
large
generator
is
much
more
likely
than
a
sudden
loss
of
an
equivalent
amount
of
load
Frequency
response
is
typically
discussed
in
the
context
of
a
loss
of
a
large
generator
u
1-172
2/9/15
1-173
2/9/15
1-174
2/9/15
1-175
2/9/15
Even
though
the
generaPon
has
tripped
&
the
1,000
MW
supplied
by
the
generator
has
been
removed
from
the
InterconnecPon
The
loads
conPnue
to
use
the
same
amount
of
power
u The
Law
of
ConservaPon
of
Energy
requires
that
the
1,000
MW
must
be
supplied
to
the
InterconnecPon
if
energy
balance
is
to
be
conserved
u This
addiPonal
1,000
MW
is
produced
by
extracPng
kinePc
energy
that
was
stored
in
the
rotaPng
mass
of
all
of
the
synchronized
generators
&
motors
on
the
interconnecPon
EssenPally
using
this
equipment
as
a
giant
ywheel
u As
the
frequency
decreases,
motors
slow
&
perform
less
work,
resulPng
in
a
decrease
in
load
called
load
damping
This
load
damping
is
the
reason
that
the
power
decit
iniPally
declines
Synchronously
operaPng
motors
contribute
to
load
damping
Variable
speed
drives
that
are
decoupled
from
the
interconnecPon
frequency
do
not
contribute
to
load
damping
u Note
in
the
graphic
above
that
the
power
decit
exactly
equals
the
inerPal
energy
usage
IndicaPng
that
there
is
no
power
or
energy
imbalance
at
any
Pme
during
this
process
u The
price
we
pay
is
a
declining
frequency
u
1-176
2/9/15
During
the
iniPal
seconds
of
the
event,
the
governors
have
yet
to
respond
to
the
frequency
decline
This
is
illustrated
with
the
doHed
blue
line
above
The
delay
results
from
the
Pme
that
it
takes
the
governor
controls
to
adjust
the
equipment
&
the
Pme
it
takes
the
mass
to
ow
from
the
source
of
the
energy
(main
steam
control
valve
for
steam
turbines,
combustor
for
gas
turbines,
or
gate
valve
for
hydro
turbines)
to
turbine/generator
u Note
that
the
frequency
conPnues
to
decline
due
to
the
ongoing
extracPon
of
energy
from
the
rotaPng
turbine/generators
&
synchronously
operated
motors
u The
reducPon
in
load
also
conPnues
as
the
eect
of
load
damping
conPnues
to
reduce
the
load
while
frequency
declines
u
1-177
2/9/15
1-178
2/9/15
1-179
2/9/15
1-180
2/9/15
Graph
above
idenPes
the
averaging
periods
used
to
esPmate
the
pre-disturbance
A-value
&
the
post-disturbance
B-value
The
A
&
B
values
are
used
to
calculate
the
seHled
frequency
response
u The
measurement
of
seHled
frequency
response
has
been
standardized
to
limit
the
variability
in
measurement
resulPng
from
the
poorly
specied
selecPon
of
points
A
&
B
T-0
is
dened
as
the
rst
scan
value
that
shows
a
deviaPon
in
frequency
of
some
signicance,
usually
approaching
about
10
mHz
The
A-value
averaging
period
of
the
previous
16
seconds
prior
to
t-0
was
selected
to
allow
for
an
averaging
of
at
least
2
scans
for
enPPes
uPlizing
6
second
scan
rates
u The
B-value
averaging
period
of
(t+20
to
t+52
seconds)
was
selected
to
obtain
the
average
of
the
data
a^er
primary
frequency
response
was
deployed
&
the
transient
completed
(seHled)
But
before
any
signicant
inuence
of
secondary
frequency
control
u
1-181
2/9/15
1-182
2/9/15
1-183
2/9/15
1-184
2/9/15
1-185
2/9/15
1-186
2/9/15
The plots above were done using data from the synchrophasor system
1-187
2/9/15
NERC
uses
the
metric
ALR1-12
to
track
&
monitor
InterconnecPon
frequency
response
u ALR1-12
measures
the
average
FRC
for
all
events
where
frequency
drops
more
than
the
InterconnecPons
dened
threshold
u The
chart
shows
the
FRC
of
163
events
in
the
East
u A
graph
of
the
linear
regression
line
&
FRC
scaHer
plot
is
given
in
the
chart
u The
regression
line
has
a
small
posiPve
slope
Meaning
that
the
FRC
variable
has
a
slowly
increasing
general
trend
in
Pme
On
average,
Eastern
FRC
increases:
u Daily
by
0.26
MW
/
0.1Hz
u Monthly
by
7.87
MW
/
0.1
Hz
u Yearly
by
95.81
MW
/
0.1
Hz
u
1-188
2/9/15
1-189
2/9/15
1-190
2/9/15
The
12
seconds
immediately
following
the
loss
of
Cherokee
Unit
#3
are
ploHed
above
A
whole
lot
is
going
on!
u This
view
is
completely
lost
in
the
10
minute
plot
of
the
previous
page
1-191
2/9/15
The
idea
of
the
IFRO
is
to
ensure
each
InterconnecPon
has
enough
frequency
response
to
respond
to
their
largest
credible
conPngency
without
iniPaPng
UFLS
u The IFRO is divided amount the Interconnections BA using the following
formula:
u
FROBA = IFRO
u
u
u
u
Annual GenBA
The annual MWH output of generating plants within BA Area
Annual LoadBA
The annual MWH load within BA Area
Annual GenINT
The sum of MWH GenBA values in Interconnection
Annual LoadINT
The sum of MWH LoadBA values in Interconnection
1-192
2/9/15
StarPng
F
Typical
frequency
prior
to
an
event
occurrence
u UFLS
1ST
Step
1ST
Step
of
InterconnecPon
UFLS
program
u CBR
C
to
B
RaPo
is
the
staPsPcally
determined
raPo
of
the
InterconnecPons
Point
C
to
Value
B
values
u MDF
Maximum
Delta
Frequency
is
the
maximum
allowable
frequency
change
given
a
disturbance
event
u The
MDF
is
based
on
numerous
InterconnecPon
Data
including
their
1ST
step
of
UFLS
u RCC
Resource Contingency Criteria is the largest category C (N2) event
identified except for the Eastern Interconnection, which uses the
largest event in the last 10 years
u CLR
Credit for Load Response allows a portion of the IFRO to be covered
by load that responds to frequency deviations
u IFRO
InterconnecPon
Frequency
Response
ObligaPon
is
calculated by dividing
the RCC by 10 times the MDF
u
1-193
2/9/15
1-194
2/9/15
Power
angle
=
SR
The
MW
ow
is
strongly
Ped
to
SR
u A
change
in
MW
ow
is
normally
accompanied
by
a
change
in
SR
u Need
relaPve
acceleraPon
to
change
SR
Frequency
deviaPons
result
in
relaPve
acceleraPon
&
power
angle
changes
u
u
1-195
2/9/15
1-196
2/9/15
1-197
2/9/15
1-198
2/9/15
1-199
2/9/15
1-200
u
u
2/9/15
1-201
u
u
2/9/15
1-202
u
u
2/9/15
1-203