com/
and Industrial Health
DPPH free radical scavenging activity and phenotypic difference in hepatoprotective plant (Silybum
marianum L.)
Nisar Ahmad, Hina Fazal, Bilal Haider Abbasi, Shazma Anwar and Abdul Basir
Toxicol Ind Health 2013 29: 460 originally published online 23 February 2012
DOI: 10.1177/0748233712436637
The online version of this article can be found at:
http://tih.sagepub.com/content/29/5/460
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
Additional services and information for Toxicology and Industrial Health can be found at:
Email Alerts: http://tih.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts
Subscriptions: http://tih.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations: http://tih.sagepub.com/content/29/5/460.refs.html
Article
Abstract
Silybum marianum L. is medicinally important for its active principle component silymarin. Silymarin regenerates
damaged hepatic tissues. On the basis of such regenerative properties, the radical scavenging activity
(1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)) of different tissues and the phenotypic difference of the hepatoprotective species, S. marianum L. were evaluated. There was less phenotypic difference in purple and white varieties
of S. marianum. Assay of the antioxidant potential of different parts of the plant revealed that significantly higher
activity (78.2%) was observed in seeds of the purple flowering plant than seeds of white flowering plant (49%)
after different time intervals. Young leaves collected from white flowering plant exhibit 64.8% activity, which is
higher than the purple flowering plant (55.1%). Significantly, same activity was observed in mature leaves of
white (52%) and purple flowering plants (50%). The main stem collected from both the varieties exhibits similar
activity from 50 to 52%. A 67.2% activity was recorded for mature roots of white flowering plant followed by
roots of the purple variety (65%). The present study revealed that seeds and roots of both the varieties
scavenge and detoxify more DPPH free radicals than other plant parts and can be used as a source of natural
antioxidants and food additives.
Keywords
Silybum marianum, DPPH, radical scavenging activity, phenotypic, tissues
Introduction
Silybum marianum (L.) (milk thistle) is an important
medicinal species in the family Asteraceae. S. marianum L. is a native of Southern Europe to Asia, specially cultivated for its seeds throughout the world.
In Pakistan, it occurs as a weed in Punjab, Sindh and
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa by the names of Unt katara, Poli
and Karaiza, respectively. The medicinal part of the
plant is its ripe seed that contains silymarin, consisting of silybin, silidianin and silichrystin. Silibinin,
one the active components of silymarin, can regenerate the damaged hepatic tissues (Al-Anati et al., 2009;
Jayaraj et al., 2007). Besides hepatoprotection, silibinin
and its other components are also efficient as anticancerous against human breast carcinoma, cervical carcinoma, human adenocarcinoma and colon cancer cells
(Bhatia et al., 1999; Hogan et al., 2007; Mokhtari,
Ahmad et al.
461
induced by alcohol. In addition, silymarin can efficiently reduce the leukotrienes action, which can damage hepatic tissues. (Chevallier, 1996; Nice, 2000;
Weiss and Fintelmann, 2000). Recently, silymarin has
shown its potential as anticholesterolaemic agent.
Silymarin is also known to stimulate the enzyme RNA
polymerase in the nucleus of liver cells, which has
regenerative effect on liver. This results in enhancing
ribosomal protein synthesis, which is helpful in regenerating hepatocytes.
During stress conditions or incomplete body metabolism, toxic free radicals are produced. These toxic
radicals are the products of oxidation reactions, which
further start chain reactions and damage body cells
and sometimes cause serious diseases like cancer
(Ahmad et al., 2011b). Antioxidants (natural and synthetic) are those compounds that completely stop or
reduce the speed of oxidation reactions. Different
antioxidants can efficiently detoxify toxic free radicals and stop the chain reactions by undergoing oxidization themselves (Ahmad et al., 2011c). As a result,
antioxidants like thiols, ascorbic acid or polyphenols
are often used as reducing agents.
Secondary metabolites are the main active ingredients of a medicinal plant, one of the groups are phenolics that act as an important antioxidant agent
(Khanavi et al., 2009; Weiss and Fintelmann, 2000).
These secondary substances are released naturally
during different plant growth phases, some of the
active agents that are produced against stress conditions are reactive oxygen species, hydroxyl radicals,
superoxide anion radicals and nonfree radicals such
as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and peroxide (Ahmad
et al., 2011a; Ramarathnam et al., 1995). Natural antioxidants have become a major and interesting area of
scientific research nowadays (Demo et al., 1998;
Sanchez-Moreno et al., 1999). Natural antioxidants,
especially present in medicinal plants, exhibit antiinflammatory, antimicrobial, antiviral, antiallergic
and vasodilatory activities. Antioxidants of plants origin are also used as anticancer, antimutagenic and
antiaging agents (Cook and Samman, 1996; Mandal
and Gupta, 2001).
The main objective of the current study is to
evaluate the free radical scavenging activity
(1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) activity) of
different parts of S. marianum to find new potential
sources of natural antioxidants, which were subjected to extraction using methanol as a solvent and
to compare their highest antioxidant potential in different parts.
j
j
Stem diameter
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
Leaf width
Leaf length
fg
f
ab
a
Plant height
fg
Lines in leaf
e
cd
No.of spines
hi
Internodes
Nodes
ij
i
Flowers
h
i
i
Leaves/branch
Branches
gh
Leaves
0
12
g
16 20 24
Mean values
28
32
36
462
from each part were dissolved in methanol independently to get stock solutions. The stock solution was prepared by dissolving pure extract of 5 mg in 20 ml of
methanol independently.
Statistical analysis
For statistical analysis, three replicates were conducted for each activity, and the experiments were
repeated twice. The data were subjected to a oneway analysis of variance and Duncans Multiple
Range Test (Statistix version 8.1, Analytical Software, Florida, USA); p < 0.05 value was regarded
as significant.
DPPH-activitry (%)
10
15
20
25
30
60
60
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
0
10
15
20
Time intervals (min)
25
0
30
Ahmad et al.
10
15
20
25
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
10
15
20
Time intervals (min)
25
0
30
DPPH-activity (%)
10
15
20
25
30
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
0
10
15
20
Time intervals (min)
10
15
20
25
30
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
0
10
15
20
25
0
30
30
DPPH-activity (%)
DPPH-activity (%)
463
25
0
30
464
60
60
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
5
10
15
20
10
15
20
Time intervals (min)
25
25
DPPH-activity (%)
10
15
20
25
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
10
15
20
Time intervals (min)
15
20
25
30
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
10
15
20
25
0
30
25
30
50
10
50
0
0
0
0
0
30
DPPH-activity (%)
30
70
0
0
0
30
S. marianum showed 48.70, 49.39 and 52.02% activity, respectively (Figure 4), and there is less significant difference between mature leaves of both
purple and white flowering plants. In the overall
experiment, the best results were observed in the
seeds of purple variety. The antioxidant activity
(DPPH) of S. marianum, essential components and
different tissues was also reported by Hadaruga and
Hadaruga (2009; Anderson et al., 1994; Carini et al.,
1992; Chevallier, 1996; Huda-Faujan et al., 2009;
Kahkonen et al., 1999; Koch and Loffler, 1985;
Pietrangelo et al., 1995; Weiss and Fintelmann,
DPPH-activity (%)
DPPH-activity (%)
70
10
15
20
25
30
75.0
75.0
62.5
62.5
50.0
50.0
37.5
37.5
25.0
25.0
12.5
12.5
0.0
0
10
15
20
Time intervals (min)
25
0.0
30
2000). After seeds of purple variety, the best antioxidant activities were also observed in the roots of both
varieties. Roots of purple flowering variety of S. marianum represent 65% activity (Figure 8), while the
roots of white variety exhibit 67.2% activity as shown
in Figure 9. The main stem collected from both the
varieties exhibits the activities in the range of 50
52%, respectively (Figures 10 and 11).
Conclusion
Different tissues of important medicinal plant S. marianum L. were subjected to extractions with solvent
Ahmad et al.
10
15
20
25
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
0
70
10
15
20
25
30
70
50
50
DPPH-activity(%)
30
10
15
20
25
0
30
DPPH-activity(5)
465
60
60
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
0
10
15
20
Time intervals (min)
25
0
30
Figure 12. Plants, flowers and seeds of white and purple flowering varieties of Silybum marianum L.
466
References
Ahmad N, Fazal H, Abbasi BH and Farooq S (2010a) An
efficient free radical scavenging activity in Ginkgo biloba,
Stevia rebaudiana and Parthenium hysterophorous leaves
through DPPH (2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl). International Journal of Phytomedicine 2: 231239.
Ahmad N, Fazal H, Abbasi BH, Rashid M, Mahmood T and
Fatima N (2010b) Efficient regeneration and antioxidant
potential in regenerated-tissues of Piper nigrum L. Plant
Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 102: 129134.
Ahmad N, Fazal H and Abbasi BH (2011a) In vitro larvicidal potential and antioxidative enzymes activities in
Ginkgo biloba, Stevia rebaudiana and Parthenium
hysterophorous. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine 4: 169175.
Ahmad N, Fazal H, Ahmad I and Abbasi BH (2011b) Free
radical scavenging (DPPH) potential in nine mentha
species. Toxicology and Industrial Health 28: 8389.
Ahmad N, Fazal H, Abbasi BH, Rahman IU, anwar S, Khan
MA, et al. (2011c) DPPH-scavenging antioxidant potential in regenerated tissues of Stevia rebaudiana, Citrus
sinensis and Saccharum officinarum. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 5: 32933297.
Al-Anati L, Essid E and Reinehr R (2009) Silibinin protects
OTA-mediated TNFalpha release from perfused rat
livers and isolated rat Kupffer cells. Molecular Nutrition
and Food Research 53 460466.
Anderson D, Yu TW, Phillips BJ and Schmezer P (1994)
The effect of various antioxidants and other modifying
agents on oxygen-radical-generated DNA damage in
human lymphocytes in the COMET assay. Mutation
Research 307: 261271.
Bhatia N, Zhao J and Wolf D (1999) Inhibition of human
carcinoma cell growth and DNA synthesis by silibinin,
an active constituent of milk thistle: comparison with
silymarin. Cancer Letters 147: 7784.
Ahmad et al.
467