Static Load
Analysis of
Kansas
City
Overhead
Walkways
Talha Yousuf
Table
Of
Conte
nt
DESCRIPTION:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2
1.1
1.2
ORIGINAL DESIGN:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2
FABRICATED DESIGN:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2
MODEL INFORMATION:
----------------------------------3
METHODOLOGY:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------4
STUDY PROPERTIES:----------------------------------------------------------------------------4
UNITS:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4
MATERIAL PROPERTIES:-----------------------------------------------------------------------9
10
MESH RESULTS:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------10
11
11.1
11.2
11.3
11.4
11.5
FORCES:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------11
MOMENTS:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------11
STRESSES:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------11
DISPLACEMENTS:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------11
STRAINS:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------11
1 DESCRIPTION:
FIGURE I
2 MODEL INFORMATION:
Solid Bodies
Part Name
Treated As
Material Used
Lower beam
Solid Body
Length:300 mm
Mass:0.22 kg
Weight:2.20 N
Solid Body
Length:300 mm
Mass:0.22 kg
Weight:2.20 N
Solid Body
Length:110 mm
Mass:0.0120 kg
Weight:0.118 N
upper beam
Suspension rods
3 METHODOLOGY:
In the original accident, there was a wrongly designed link in the beam
which was real cause of failure so to keep model simple, as an analogy
to this, three suspension rods of A-36 material are used while
as a symbol of DEFECTED PIECE, the
th
suspension rod is
4 STUDY PROPERTIES:
Following table tabulates, which features were included in simulation.
Analysis type
Mesh type
Thermal Effect:
Thermal option
Zero strain temperature
Fluid pressure effects
Solver type
Large displacement
Compute free body forces
Friction
Use Adaptive Method:
Static
Solid Mesh
Yes
Include temperature loads
298 Kelvin
No
FFEPlus
Yes
Yes
No
No
NITS:
Unit system:
Length/Displacement
Temperature
Angular velocity
Pressure/Stress
SI (MKS)
mm
Kelvin
Rad/sec
N/m^2
5
U
6.4 MESHING:
FIGURE V-AFTER MESHING
6.5.1
STRESS
ANALYSIS:
The wrong
link
The
breaking
probably
This gives the idea, how the bridge beam would likely to have failed.
Although in the real disaster, the wrongly designed link failed thus
causing the whole system to collapse.
6.5.2
DISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS:
6.5.3
STRAIN ANALYSIS:
FIGURE VIII-STRAIN
ANALYSIS
7 MATERIAL PROPERTIES:
Model Reference
Properties
Name:
Model type:
Default failure
criterion:
Yield strength:
Tensile strength:
Elastic modulus:
Poisson's ratio:
Mass density:
Shear modulus:
Name:
Model type:
Default failure
criterion:
Yield strength:
Tensile strength:
Elastic modulus:
Poisson's ratio:
Mass density:
Shear modulus:
Thermal
expansion
coefficient:
Components
ASTM A36 Steel
Linear Elastic
Isotropic
Max von Mises
Stress
2.5e+8 N/m^2
4e+8 N/m^2
2e+11 N/m^2
0.26
7850 kg/m^3
7.93e+10 N/m^2
Upper Beam
Lower Beam
Two bottom suspension
rods
One of the top
suspension rod
Wrought
Stainless Steel
Linear Elastic
Isotropic
Max von Mises
Stress
2.07e+8 N/m^2
5.17e+8 N/m^2
2e+11 N/m^2
0.26
8000 kg/m^3
7.9e+10 N/m^2
1.1e-5 /Kelvin
Fixture Image
Fixture Details
Entities:
Type:
2 Faces
Fixed Geometry
Faces to
remain
static
(fixed)
Load
name
Load Image
Load Details
Entities:
Load Type:
Force:
Direction:
Vertical
Force
2 faces
Apply normal force
50kN
, Perpendicular to
face
Solid Mesh
Standard mesh
Off
Off
4 Points
3.41836 mm
0.170918 mm
High
Off
10 MESH RESULTS:
Total Nodes
Total Elements
Maximum Aspect Ratio
% of elements with Aspect Ratio <
3
% of elements with Aspect Ratio >
10
% of distorted elements(Jacobian)
38066
19242
10.125
97.9
0.0052
0
Units
Sum X
Sum Y
Sum Z
Resultant
Entire Model
0.00416565
99982
0.00146484
99982
11.2 MOMENTS:
Selectio
n set
Units
Sum X
Sum Y
Sum Z
Resultant
Entire Model
N.m
11.3 STRESSES:
From Figure VI-stress analysis @ 50kN applied on each beam
Name
Type
Stress
Min
Max
11.4 DISPLACEMENTS:
Name
Type
Displacement
Resultant Displacement
Min
Max
0 mm
27.98 mm
11.5 STRAINS:
From Figure VIII-strain
Name
Strain
End
Of
Repor
t
analysis
Type
Min
Max
Equivalent Strain
2.23 e-5
0.059