This pdf is a high level summary of the talk on Youtube. It is not a complete transcription of the talk.
Introduction
We will undertake a chronological analysis.
However, I will stop to highlight and give some details on certain important groupings, players, alliances etc.
In understanding this topic it is key that one recognises the importance of:
- Understanding geography;
- Competing political interests of different players.
Main historical players in this analysis
Ottoman Caliphate;
The house of Saud (Aal suud);
The family of Mohammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab (Aal Ash Sheikh);
Foreign powers (chiefly Britain and France, and later USA);
Sharifs of Makkah;
Rasheedis of Najd (Aal Rasheed);
Egyptian governors1 of Ottoman Caliphate (mainly Muhammad Ali Pasha and Ibrahim Pasha).
Main themes
Ottoman control of Hijaz for hundreds of years and relationship with sharifs;
Status of the interior of Arabia (Najd) and ensuing wars;
Union of Aal Suud and Aal Ash Sheikh;
Rise, fall, rise, fall, and rise of Aal Suud;
Foreign interests in Saudi Arabia;
Internal tensions and the future.
Map of Saudi Arabia
^ Map of what is modern day Saudi Arabia from before the creation of the nation state.
1
Note: There was clear foreign influence acting on both, but that is beyond the remit of this talk, so we proceed on the basis
that at least officially the said persons were governors of the Ottoman Caliphate in Egypt.
They were seen as the leaders and given they were from the Prophets family, they had a sense of religious
legitimacy and were respected (anyone from the Prophetic family usually is through different parts of the
Muslim world).
Their power was also recognised by the Ottomans upon their coming to power and taking control of Hijaz in
1517.
Under the Ottomans, Hijaz became a province and in fact was called the Hejaz Vilayet.
Succession became subject to the Sublime Porte. The system of governance was such that the Sharif was
appointed by the Ottomans from the ashraf of Rasool Allah while there was also a wali appointed over Hijaz by
the Ottomans.
Najd
Area of tribal factions and desert oases.
Was politically relatively irrelevant and economically irrelevant as well.
Never needed to be fully controlled by the Ottomans, though at times their influence extended well went into it
and they did for a time directly hold it, only to withdraw for various reasons, which is relevant to our present
discussion.
The greatest influence exerted over this area was by the tribe of Bani Khalid who ruled over Al Ahsa.
Aal Suud: the rise
Named after Muhammad ibn Al Suud.
Founder of the First Saudi state.
Chief (Ameer) of an agricultural settlement (very small one) close to todays Riyadh, called Diriyyah.
Was not a tribal chief as such, and did not have strong tribal ties to any of the major tribes.
Belonged to offshoots of the Anizzah tribe of Najd, a tribe from which other people found their roots (eg todays
Al Khalifah rulers of Bahrain and Al Sabah of Kuwait, who are key in this historical analysis).
Diriyyah: small, relatively irrelevant agricultural settlement cant even really be called a town!
Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab
Born in around 1702.
Born into the tribe of Banu Tamim (NOT nomadic, but sedentary) in Uyaynah, which is 40 kilometres from this
Diriyyah.
Went and studied in parts of Iraq, in Medina, and in Makkah.
Controversial figure with controversial teachings that are hotly debated even to this day. However, his Islamic
knowledge is recognised by many.
Views shaped by what he saw and wanted a return to tawhid.
Upon his return to Uyaynah, initially gained the favour of the ruler Uthman ibn Mu'ammar. Began to implement
some of his teachings, including for instance levelling grave of a companion, Zayd ibn al-Khattab, the brother of
Umar. The grave was located just north of modern day Riyadh.
Organised the stoning to death of those who committed adultery, including a woman who admitted to the same.
Caused consternation among people on account of the propriety of procedure and his authority to order such
punishment.
Uthman ibn Mu'ammars power was only over his area he was by no means extremely powerful. His power
was rather guaranteed by Sulaiman ibn Muhammad ibn Ghurayr who ruled over Al Ahsa and Al Qateef. ibn
Ghurayr was not happy with what he heard, so he ordered ibn Abdul Wahhab be killed. Uthman ibn Mu'ammar
did not kill him, but expelled him.
1744: ibn Abdul Wahhab was accepted by Ibn Suud and they concluded a pact between essentially Aal Suud
and Aal Ash Sheikh the families of the two men whereby Ibn Abdul Wahhab became the religious authority
and Muhammad ibn Al Suud became the political authority of Diriyyah.
This is referred to sometimes as the first Saudi state.
First Saudi State: Diriyyah Emirate
Based in Diriyyah and effectively started in 1744. In the first ten years it was confined to that region and
according to some estimations was not greater than 30 square kilometres.
At this stage it was confined to dawah, and writing letters and sending people to various tribes in the area.
Even the leader of Uyaynah ibn Muammar did not challenge him.
Finally in 1757 the Uyaynah amir challenged him and there was a battle in which Aal Suud were victorious.
Relative lull for a few decades with skirmishes here and there, but not the major, aggressive expansion that was
to come.
Muhammad ibn Al Suud died and his son Abdul Aziz came to power, and in 1787 declared that the rule would
remain in the family. Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab allegedly witnessed this and acknowledged it (though
whether he did so is not, in the wider scheme, of itself determinative). While not necessarily officially, it also
seems as though religious leadership was vested in Aal Sheikh, the family of the sheikh (and has been passed
down almost hereditarily since 2).
In 1792, Ibn Abdul Wahhab died and his son Abdullah succeeded him as the leading scholarly figure.
All the muftis and most prominent national sheikhs have been from the Aal Sheikh, barring one.
At one stage 1869-97 became quite large, extending from Aleppo and Damascus to Basrah, and down to
Oman and Asir.
Despite efforts to unite Arabian tribes against the Suud, they eventually started to lose ground to the Aal Suud,
especially after Suudis came under British patronage.
They were trained by the najdi ulema who had a very different tradition from that of the Hijazi ulema (who
were madhabi and thus very different, often inclined to sufism) they were very strict, and their teachings
impressed on the mutawwaa the importance of enjoining good and forbidding evil. They thus ordered the
destruction of shrines, debated whether the telegraph was haram, etc.
The ikhwan were the mounted fighting force and were led by Faysal al Duwaysh, a notable and brave fighter, and
Ibn Bijad and Ibn Hithlayn. Al Duwaysh was very popular, used to be accompanied by a massive entourage of 150
armed men, and saw himself as somewhat an equal to ibn Suud. He had also been a tribal chief in his own right,
and wanted to be the amir of Madina.
In early 1927, Ikhwan held a conference in Artawiyyah, criticising ibn Suud for: relationship with Britain, taxes,
serial marriages and luxurious lifestyle.
Ibn Suud responded: held a conference where the najdi ulema confirmed that leadership over jihad was in his
hands and he should call the shots. The ikhwan rejected the result of this conference and the verdicts of the
Riyadh ulema.
Ibn Suud, in grand theatre, abdicated his leadership, with notables from all around coming to Riyadh. He gave an
impassioned speech asking people and ulema for clarification on all issues and to decide the issue once and for
all. His leadership was confirmed by the ulema, who also said that the ikhwan were usurpers and their
elimination was legitimate.
This was the start of the role of the najdi ulema as apologists for Aal Suud, which has continued since.
The ikhwan rebellion became a reality as the three mentioned figures aspired to split ibn Suuds territory among
themselves. With the backing of the Najdi ulema, including the descendants of ibn Abdul Wahhab, ibn Suud
assembled a fighting force consisting of men from various areas of Najd. At the battle of Sabila, in March 1929,
ikhwan leadership were massacred by guns while they fought on camelback. 500 were killed in 2 days. Britain
once again actively supported Al Suud, with the Royal Air Force bombing some of the positions of the Ikhwan.
Eventually the leaders of the rebellion surrendered to Kuwait in 1930.
Interesting point to note: the Najdi ulema, earlier the mentors of the Ikhwan, who gave them their zeal, their
vigour, were the ones who justified their oppression and killing.
In 1932, Ibn Suud declared his realm: Al Mamlaka al-arabiyya al-suudiyya.
Arab revolt
Context: WW1, in which The Ottoman Empire had allied with the Germans, against both Britain and France.
So in 1916 Britain and France encouraged the Sharif of Mecca (Hussein) to lead a pan Arab revolt against the
Ottomans, and promised him that they would support a unitary state for him.
Aal Suud didnt participate because they had their eyes on the bigger prize of an Arabian peninsula united under
their rule. So ironically they didnt directly fight the Ottoman Caliphate directly before its downfall, but their
actions in the preceding two centuries obviously had much to do with weakening the Caliphate.
The British and French didnt honour their promises to Hussein to support his pan-Arab project, with Britain
shifting support to Aal Suud.
The Revolt was a blow to the Ottomans and contributed to their downfall.
America and oil
Post WW1 and with anti-colonialism ripe throughout the world, Britain was in decline. Meanwhile a new
superpower had emerged, though it would not be until WW2 that its true might would be on full display (USA).
Was a pioneer in science, technology and leading the world in various regards.
In 1932, ibn Suud signed a contract with the Standard Oil of California to look for oil. Commercial quantities
found in 1938.
In 1944: became ARAMCO. In 1974 Suudis gained a 20% share and then finally in 1980 full control.
One quarter of worlds oil. Post 1971 realised that it is not sufficient by itself.
What Suudi gets is security a powerful ally against enemies both home and abroad, with massive favourable
defence contracts.
Power of oil seen during the Oil Crisis in 1973 during the Yom Kippur War.
American interests: in keeping oil prices stable, and for this political stability is needed; this is the cornerstone of
their relationship with Suudiyyah. Further, Britian and America have since struggled against each other in proxy
politics by backing various elements of the royal family.
Post independence issues:
Anti Nasserism and a harbour for the Ikhwan.