Anda di halaman 1dari 25

 

The  Northern  California  Junior  State  of  America  


Proudly  Presents  
Spring  State  2010  
Life  and  Liberty:  Reimagining  the  American  Dream  
Skeleton  Agenda  
Friday,  April  23,  2010  
 
Registration                                                                                         4:00-­5:30  
California  Ballroom  Registration  Desk  
 
Luggage  Storage                       4:00-­5:30  
Salon  7    
 
Block  1                           4:25-­5:25  
Salon  3       Thought  Talk:  Is  there  such  a  thing  as  a  “just  war”?  
Salon  4   Resolved:  that  the  US  enact  a  system  of  compulsory  voting  
Salon  5   Resolved:  that  the  US  eliminate  the  minimum  wage.  
Salon  6     Thought  Talk:  Are  patents  on  all  genetic  modifications  or  biological  organisms  ethical?    
   
Opening  Session                       5:30-­6:00  
California  Ballroom  
 
Keynote  Address:                       6:00-­6:45  
California  Ballroom  
 
Dinner                           6:45-­  8:00  
 
State  Nominations                       8:10-­9:00  
California  Ballroom  
 
Teacher  Advisor  Meeting                     8:15-­8:45  
Santa  Barbara  
 
Regional/Chapter  Caucus/Key  &  Luggage  Distribution                                     9:05-­  9:30  
Chapters  will  not  receive  keys  until  they  have  submitted  a  completed  2009-­2010  tax  form.  
GCR         Salon  3  
GGR         Salon  6  
EBR         Salon  4  
CVR         Salon  5  
 
Night  Activities                          
Salon  3         Candidates’  meeting                 9:30-­10:00  
Salon  B                           Concert                   10:00-­12:00  
Newport  Beach       Game  Room                 10:00-­11:30  
Ponderosa       Impromptu  Speech  Contest               10:00-­11:30  
         
           
Curfew                                                  12:15    
No  one  is  allowed  outside  of  his  or  her  rooms  past  12:15  am.    
 
Saturday,  April  24,  2010  
Breakfast                         8:15-­9:15  
 
Regional  Nominations                       9:20-­9:45  
GCR         Salon  3  
GGR         Salon  6  
EBR         Salon  4  
CVR         Salon  7  
                                                               
Block  2                           9:50-­10:50  
Salon  3     Assembly    
Salon  4     Historical  Resolved:  Resolved:  that  the  US  should  use  a  land  invasion  instead  of  a  nuclear  bomb  against  the  
Japanese  in  World  War  II.  
Salon  6   Resolved:  that  Supreme  Court  Justices  serve  10  year  appointed  terms  instead  of  lifetime  terms.  
Salon  A   Teacher  Advisor's  Tricks  of  the  Trade  
Salon  B   Workshop:  Debate  101-­  Subsequent  Speeches  
Salon  C   Workshop:  How  to  Moderate  
Salon  7     State  Candidate’s  Forum      
Salon  D     Thought  Talk:  Is  the  18-­‐month  plan  for  Afghanistan  the  right  policy?  
Ponderosa               Activism  Simulation  
 
Block  3                           11:00-­12:00  
Salon  3     Assembly  
Salon  4   Resolved:  that  US  government’s  censorship  of  images  of  war  in  the  news  violates  the  1st  amendment  of  the  
Constitution.    
Salon  5   Resolved:  that  the  US  authorize  air-­‐strikes  on  Iran's  nuclear  facilities  if  Iran  does  not  halt  production  of  
uranium.  
Salon  6     Resolved:  that  the  US  double  its  reliance  on  nuclear  power  over  the  next  thirty  years  
Portland     Resolved:  that  the  US  institute  a  tax  on  carbon  emissions  
Salon  E       Solution  Session  
Salon  D     Resolved:  that  California  privatize  its  education  system  
 
Lunch               12:00-­1:15  
 
Block  4                                                                 1:25-­2:25    
Salon  3     Resolved:  that  the  federal  government  permanently  nationalize  the  banking  system  
Salon  4      Supreme  Court  Hearing  
Salon  5                   Resolved:    that  the  US  establish  a  policy  of  open  immigration  provided  that  all  immigrants  register  with  the  
INS  before  entering  the  US  
Salon  6                   Resolved:  that  President  Obama  permit  harsher  interrogation  techniques  in  order  to  prevent  terrorism.  
Salon  B   Thought  Talk:  Has  the  advent  of  Globalism  done  more  harm  than  good?  
Salon  C      Special  Activity:  Model  UN  
Newport  Beach    Political  Fair  
Santa  Barbara    Political  Fair  
Ponderosa                    Activism  Documentary  
   
Block  5                                 2:35-­3:35  
Salon  3    Crisis  Scenario  
Salon  4     Resolved:  that  the  US  take  military  action  against  North  Korea  
Salon  5                     Resolved:  that  Social  Security  be  replaced  by  a  mandatory  individual  savings  program  
Salon  6                     Resolved:  that  Congress  remove  foreign  aid  from  the  US  budget.  
Salon  C     Thought  Talk:  Did  Obama  deserve  the  Nobel  Prize?  
Salon  D     Resolved:  that  the  flu  vaccine  be  mandated  for  K-­‐12  students  in  the  US  
Newport  Beach   Political  Fair  
Santa  Barbara          Political  Fair  
Ponderosa   Activism  Documentary  (continued)  
 
Block  6                           3:45-­4:45  
Salon  3     Resolved:  that  California  privatize  its  prison  system.  
Salon  4     Philosophical  Resolved:  Friedrich  Nietzche  versus  Voltaire—Resolved:  that  humans  are  inherently  evil    
Salon  5   Resolved:  that  the  US  continue  to  use  Guantanamo  Bay  to  detain  enemy  combatants  
Salon  6     Resolved:  that  full  body  scans  by  the  TSA  are  an  unreasonable  search  and  seizure.  
Salon  C   Resolved:  that  the  federal  government  impose  additional  taxes  on  internationally  outsourced  labor  in  order  to  
bring  jobs  back  to  the  US.  
Salon  A   Thought  Talk:  Will  the  US  still  be  the  world  hegemon  in  10  years?  
Newport  Beach   Political  Fair  
Santa  Barbara   Political  Fair  
Ponderosa           Activism  Wrap  Up:  Continuing  our  Flight    
 
State  Elections                         4:55-­6:35  
California  Ballroom  
 
Dinner                                   6:35-­7:50  
 
Chapter/Regional  Caucus                       8:00-­8:30    
GCR         Salon  3  
GGR         Salon  6  
EBR         Salon  4  
CVR         Salon  7  
 
Night  Activities                          
Grand  Ballroom                         Governor’s  Ball                 9:00-­12:00  
Portland       Game  Room                 9:30-­11:30  
Newport   Movie  –  Ferris  Bueller’s  Day  Off                                                                         9:00-­11:00  
Ponderosa       Governor’s  Roast                 9:30-­10:00  
Suite  1242         Teacher  Advisor  Reception               8:30-­9:45    
 
Curfew                                                  12:15    
No  one  is  allowed  outside  of  his  or  her  rooms  past  12:15  am.    
 
                             
 
Sunday,  April  25,  2010  
Breakfast                         8:30-­9:30  
 
Regional  Elections                       9:35-­10:45  
GCR         Salon  3  
GGR         Salon  6  
EBR         Salon  4  
CVR         Salon  7  
                                                               
Block  7                           10:50-­11:50  
Salon  4     Resolved:  that  the  United  States  ban  smoking  in  all  public  places  
Salon  5   Activism  Debate:  Resolved:  that  the  United  States  eliminate  diplomatic  immunity  for  cases  of  human  trafficking  
and  violent  crimes.  
Salon  6   Resolved:  that  Congress  reclaim  its  right  to  declare  war  by  cutting  off  funding  for  all  large  military  operations  
that  take  place  without  a  declaration  of  war.  
Seattle     “Chapter  of  the  Year”  presentations:  
Salon  D   Thought  Talk:  Should  the  US  take  action  to  ensure  human  rights  in  Sub-­‐Saharan  Africa?  
Salon  E     Workshop:  How  to  get  involved  next  year  
Portland               Summer  School  Information/fundraising  meeting    
 
 
Block  8                               12:00-­1:00  
Salon  3   Thought  talk:  Should  the  American  political  system  be  expanded  to  allow  for  a  3rd  major  party?  
Salon  7   Resolved:  That  performance-­‐related  pay  for  teachers  be  mandatory  in  California  public  schools.  
Salon  4   Resolved:  that  California  change  its  policy  on  criminal  drug  users  from  punishment  to  rehabilitation  
Salon  6   Resolved:  that  non-­‐denominational  intelligent  design  be  taught  alongside  evolution  in  public  school  
classrooms  
Portland     Summer  School  Interview  Session    
Sierra           Solution  Session    
Seattle     Activism  Speaker:  Perla  Flores  
 
Lunch                           1:00-­2:15  
 
Block  9                               2:20-­3:20  
Salon  3   Thought  talk:  Do  unions  hurt  American  workers  more  than  they  help  them?  
Salon  4   Resolved:  that  special  interests  corrupt  the  democratic  process.  
Salon  5   Resolved:  that  the  US  legalize  assisted  suicide  for  terminally  ill  patients    
Salon  6                 Resolved:  that  religion  has  no  place  in  politics  
 
Closing  Session                         3:25-­4:00  
 
 
The  Northern  California  Junior  State  of  America  
Proudly  Presents  
Spring  State  2010  
Life  and  Liberty:  Reimagining  the  American  Dream  
Friday,  April  23,  2010  
 
Registration                         4:00-­5:30  
 
Chapter  Presidents  and  Teacher  Advisors  should  go  to  the  registration  table  to  check  in.  Teacher  
Advisors  will  receive  information  packets  and  nametags  for  their  chapters.    Please  put  on  nametags  and  
wear  them  above  the  waist  at  all  times.  
 
 
Luggage  Storage                       4:00-­5:30  
 
All  luggage  should  be  taken  to  Salon  7  to  be  stored  under  the  first  letter  of  your  school’s  name.  The  
luggage  rooms  will  be  locked  until  8:15  pm,  so  keep  everything  you  will  need  with  you  until  then.  
 
 
Block  1                                       4:25-­5:25  
Salon  3       Thought  Talk:  Is  there  such  a  thing  as  a  “just  war”?  
    Moderator:  Elizabeth  Hall,  Central  High  School  
 
 It  is  an  undisputed  fact  that  war  creates  turmoil,  casualties,  and  unsalvageable  destruction.  War,  at  many  
times,  creates  not  only  physical  damages,  but  also  unbelievable  mental  harm.  Yet,  proponents  of  war  
argue  that  it  is  appropriate  when  there  is  “just  cause”,  stating  that  a  nation  cannot  enter  a  war  solely  for  
recapturing  things  taken  or  punishing  people  who  have  done  wrong;  innocent  life  must  be  in  imminent  
danger  and  intervention  must  be  to  protect  life.    In  more  recent  years,  Colin  Powell’s  Powell  Doctrine  
outlines  justification  for  war  through  an  American  standpoint,  for  the  protection  of  the  United  States.    So  
the  question  is—is  there  ever  moral  justification  for  war?  Or  are  they  just  false  justifications  used  to  
achieve  personal,  or  organizational  goals?  
 
Salon  4     Resolved:  that  the  US  enact  a  system  of  compulsory  voting  
    Pro:  Sandra  Luo,  Foothill  High  School  
    Con:  Austin  Long,  Pinole  Valley  High  School  
    Moderator:  Sam  Townsend,  Pacific  Collegiate  High  School  

The  United  States  Constitution  has  been  amended  four  times  to  extend  the  rights  of  voters.  Many  choose  
not  to  exercise  their  right  to  vote  because  of  the  jury  duty  obligation.  A  registered  voter  is  required  to  do  
jury  duty  when  called.  Voters  try  to  evade  jury  duty  as  it  disrupts  their  schedule,  making  voting  a  hassle.  
Additionally,  American  voters  do  not  vote  directly  for  the  presidential  candidate  of  their  choice.    Instead,  
registered  voters  elect  the  Electoral  College  to  elect  the  president,  a  process  which  discourages  
Americans  to  participate  in  voting  when  the  popular  vote  does  not  correlate  to  the  Electoral  College  
results.  With  the  resolution  to  make  voting  mandatory  to  all  qualified  citizens,  more  Americans  are  
represented  in  the  results  of  the  popular  vote  and  not  just  the  Americans  who  exercise  their  right  to  vote  
at  every  election.  In  doing  so,  supporters  for  a  compulsory  voting  state  that  the  representation  of  
Americans  will  be  further  coordinated  with  the  Electoral  College,  eliminating  the  chance  of  electing  an  
unpopular  president  and  actually  increasing  the  interest  of  Americans  in  voting.  Nevertheless,  critics  of  
the  resolution  argue  that  because  Americans  believe  that  voting  is  a  right  more  than  a  duty,  an  enactment  
of  a  compulsory  voting  system  would  take  away  an  essential  freedom  of  a  citizen.  Many  Americans  are  
apathetic  to  exercising  their  right  to  vote,  as  they  may  not  be  interested  in  politics.    Their  lack  of  voting  
further  acknowledges  the  low  participation-­‐voting  rate  and  shows  contentment  with  the  political  
establishment.    

Salon  5     Resolved:  that  the  US  eliminate  the  minimum  wage.  


Pro:  Nikka  Piterman,  Piedmont  High  School  
    Con:  Heraa  Hasnat,  Mercy  High  School  
    Moderator:  Lias  Djill,  Perkeley  High  School  
 
Whether  or  not  the  minimum  wage  is  beneficial  has  been  subject  to  constant  debate.  A  minimum  wage  
can  help  ensure  that  all  those  who  have  work  are  paid  fairly  and  adequately,  thus  decreasing  poverty  and  
the  exploitation  of  workers.  However,  while  a  minimum  wage  means  low  income  workers  are  paid  more  
equitably,  it  can  also  result  in  fewer  workers  being  employed,  as  employers  may  not  be  able  to  afford  as  
many  workers  at  higher  cost.  There  is  also  disagreement  as  to  whether  it  is  necessary  for  the  federal  
government  to  intervene  in  the  free  market  to  set  laws  regarding  the  minimum  wage.  Is  a  minimum  wage  
necessary?  
   
Salon  6   Thought  Talk:  Are  patents  on  all  genetic  modifications  or  biological  organisms  
ethical?    
    Moderator:  Liam  Burke,  Tamalpais  High  

As  science  progresses  and  genetic  modifications  become  increasingly  commonplace,  the  ownership  of  the  
modified  genes  has  become  a  highly  contentious  issue.  The  modifications  are  original,  but  the  genetic  
material  that  they  are  based  off  of  is  not,  and  there  is  the  additional  ethical  issue  of  patenting  the  genetic  
material  of  people.  Supporters  of  a  ban  on  patenting  genetic  material  point  out  that  the  genetic  material  
already  exists  and  that  the  innovators  have  done  nothing  but  rearrange  that  material.  They  also  believe  
that  there  is  a  moral  hazard  in  patenting  and  profiting  from  the  genes  of  people.  Opponents  of  such  a  ban  
argue  that  there  would  be  no  incentive  for  progress  if  innovators  were  not  allowed  the  rights  to  their  
work,  and  that  the  potential  benefits  to  humanity  in  advances  such  as  cures  for  diseases  outweigh  the  
potential  harms.  
 
Opening  Session                       5:30-­6:00  
California  Ballroom  
Jessica  Du,  Governor  
 
Welcome  to  Northern  California’s  2010  Spring  State  Convention,  “Life  and  Liberty:  Reimagining  the  
American  Dream”  Prepare  to  embark  on  a  fun-­‐filled  weekend  of  thought-­‐provoking  debates,  entertaining  
thought  talks,  and  other  fabulous  activities.  Also  you  will  have  the  exciting  opportunity  to  elect  your  new  
leaders  for  next  year.    
 
 
Keynote  Address:                       6:00-­6:45  
California  Ballroom  
 
Williamson  M  Evers  is  a  fellow  at  the  Hoover  Institute  at  Stanford,  California.  In  the  early  70s  and  80s,  
Evers  was  a  member  of  the  Libertarian  party.  He  even  ran  as  the  Libertarian  Party  candidate  for  Congress  
for  the  12th  District  of  California  in  1980.  Now,  focusing  on  educational  policy,  Mr.  Evers  is  a  fellow  at  the  
Hoover  Institute  with  an  expertise  in  school  finance,  testing,  and  accountability  policy.  He  served  as  the  
Assistant  Secretary  of  Education  for  Planning,  Evaluation,  and  Policy  Development  from  2007-­‐2009.  
Evers  also  worked  in  Iraq  as  a  senior  advisor  for  Education  from  July  to  December  2003.  Having  written  
opinions  in  the  New  York  Times,  Wall  Street  Journal,  and  Christian  Science  Monitor,  Williamson  M.  Evers  
is  trusted  name  in  the  world  of  educational  policy  development  
Dinner                         6:45-­  8:00  
 
Time  to  take  a  break  and  get  something  to  eat!  Mingle  with  your  fellow  convention-­‐goers  while  you’re  
standing  in  line  at  one  of  the  nearby  food  locations.  Check  your  map,  located  at  the  back  of  this  booklet,  
for  ideas.  Make  sure  to  come  back  on  time  for  the  second  block  –  you  don’t  want  to  miss  anything  
exciting!  
 
State  Nominations                       8:10-­9:00  
California  Ballroom  
 
Teacher  Advisor  Meeting-­Mandatory                 8:15-­8:45  
Santa  Barbara  
 
Regional/Chapter  Caucus/Key  &  Luggage  Distribution                               9:05-­  9:30  
Chapters  will  not  receive  keys  until  they  have  submitted  a  completed  2009-­2010  tax  form.  
GCR         Salon  3  
GGR         Salon  6  
EBR         Salon  4  
CVR         Salon  5  
 
Night  Activities                    
Salon  3         Candidates’  Meeting               9:30-­10:00  
 
Want  to  get  more  involved  in  JSA?    Interested  in  campaigning?  Running  for  office  is  an  exciting  way  to  
meet  people  and  take  on  a  little  more  responsibility!    If  you  have  not  already  declared,  but  are  interested  
in  running,  come  to  this  meeting  to  learn  more  about  each  position  and  the  rules  for  elections!    All  
candidates  for  state  or  regional  office  MUST  attend  this  important  meeting.    
 
Salon  B                           The  Junior  State  of  America  Spring  Concert       10:00-­12:00    
 
In  support  of  spreading  awareness  for  our  inspiring  activism  cause,  Northern  California  Junior  State  of  
America  proudly  presents  Hot  Challenge  and  David  Elijah  Rose.  Deemed  as  one  of  Aaron  Axelson’s,  music  
director  of  Live  105,  top  local  bands,  Hot  Challenge  brings  electropop  to  a  new  level  with  their  catchy  
beats  and  songs  that  make  their  fans  just  want  to  dance.  David  Elijah  Rose’s  experimental  electronic  solo  
project  is  projected  beautifully  in  his  recently  released  album,  μετά.  This  is  an  event  you  don’t  want  to  
miss!  
 
Newport  Beach       Game  Room               10:00-­11:30  
 
Socialize,  take  a  break  from  other  the  dance,  or  become  the  poker  king/queen!    Don't  forget  to  stop  by  
this  JSA  classic  for  board  games,  cards,  and  more.  
 
Ponderosa         Impromptu  Speech  Contest             10:00-­11:30  
 
Want  to  brush  up  on  your  spontaneous  argumentation  skills?    Love  to  hear  the  sound  of  your  own  voice?    
Try  your  luck  at  the  impromptu  speech  contest!    Topics  will  range  from  serious  to  silly,  so  stop  by  to  
watch  even  if  you  don't  want  to  speak!  
               
Curfew                               12:15    
No  one  is  allowed  outside  of  his  or  her  rooms  past  12:15  am.  
Saturday,  April  24,  2009  
Breakfast                         8:15-­9:15  
 
Regional  Nominations                     9:20-­9:45  
GCR         Salon  3  
GGR         Salon  6  
EBR         Salon  4  
CVR         Salon  7  
                                                               
Block  2                         9:50-­10:50  
Salon  3       Assembly    
    All  Chapter  Presidents  are  required  to  attend  Assembly.  
 
Salon  4     Historical  Resolved:  that  the  US  should  use  a  land  invasion  instead  of  a  nuclear  
bomb  against  the  Japanese  in  World  War  II.  
Pro:  Jacob  Angel,  San  Mateo  High  
  Con:  Kevin  Koh,  Northgate  High  School  
  Moderator:  Theresa  Gupta,  American  High  School  
 
To  this  day,  the  nuclear  bombings  of  Hiroshima  and  Nagasaki  remain  the  only  offensive  use  of  a  nuclear  
weapon  by  any  nation,  and  one  of  the  most  controversial  military  strategies  in  the  history  of  the  United  
States.  Travel  back  in  time  with  us,  and  hear  why  some  believe  an  alternative  to  the  nuclear  bombs  
should  have  been  used.  Critics  of  the  nuclear  strategy  contend  that  the  Japanese  were  going  to  surrender  
soon,  that  U.S.  surrender  statutes  were  too  high,  and  that  the  nuclear  bombings  could  have  taken  place  in  
less  populous  areas  so  that  non-­‐violent  Japanese  lives  would  be  spared.  Defenders  of  the  bombings  stand  
by  the  facts  that  the  United  States  did  give  a  fair  warning  when  it  asked  for  unconditional  surrender  and  
that  the  Japanese  were  determined  to  fight  “to  the  death”,  and  also  believe  that  a  land  invasion  on  
mainland  Japan  would  result  in  heavy  losses  to  American  soldiers.  
   
Salon  6   Resolved:  that  Supreme  Court  Justices  serve  10  year  appointed  terms  instead  
of  lifetime  terms.  
Pro:  Michael  Endick,  Northgate  High  School  
    Con:  Indranil  Bora,  Lynbrook  High  School  
    Moderator:  Connor  Reed,  Alameda  High    
 
Supreme  Court  Justice  John  Paul  Stevens’  recent  decision  to  retire  this  summer  has  revitalized  a  debate  as  
old  as  the  Court  itself  –  whether  Justices  ought  to  serve  for  life,  as  they  do  now,  or  have  their  
appointments  limited  to  a  set  term.  Proponents  of  this  resolution  believe  that  term  limits  are  necessary  to  
ensure  that  the  bench  is  filled  with  Justices  with  modern  perspectives  on  the  Constitution,  and  that  life  
terms  wrongly  allow  presidents  to  influence  judicial  decisions  for  decades  by  electing  a  judge  with  
political  ideals  similar  to  their  own.  Opponents  of  the  resolution  argue  that  life  terms  allow  the  judges  to  
be  apolitical  in  their  decisions,  as  they  would  not  have  to  vote  to  please  the  current  president  or  risk  
losing  their  appointments,  and  that  consistency  of  membership  is  key  to  stability  and  effectiveness  in  the  
Supreme  Court’s  decision  making.  
 
Salon  A     Teacher/Advisor  Tricks  of  the  Trade  
Led  By:  Daniel  Hudkins,  The  Harker  School  
Jasmin  Gerer,  Alternative  Family  Education  
      Susan  Roughgarden,  Mercy  High  School  
      Margaret  Lane,  Castilleja  School  
 
New  to  JSA?  An  old  pro?  This  session  is  a  time  to  share  and  learn  what  Teacher  Advisors  do  and  have  
done  to  make  JSA  activities  and  meetings  exciting,  as  well  as  making  going  to  and  being  at  conventions  
more  manageable  and  engaging.  
 
Salon  B     Workshop:  Debate  101-­  A  Focus  on  Subsequent  Speeches  
Led  By:  Adam  Berman,  Director  of  Debate  
 
Want  to  win  more  gavels?  Want  to  increase  your  confidence  and  ability  to  speak  extemporaneously?  
Come  to  this  session  as  we  dive  into  what  makes  a  great  subsequent  speech!    
 
Salon  C     Workshop:  How  to  Moderate  
Led  By:  Martina  Lim,  Moderator  Extraordinaire  
     
Come  to  the  moderating  session  to  learn  how  to  moderate  or  increase  your  skill.  Control  of  the  room  is  
important  and  we  want  you  to  learn  the  skills  necessary  to  be  able  to  moderate  any  size  debate  or  
meeting.  
 
Salon  D     Thought  Talk:  Is  the  18  month  plan  for  Afghanistan  the  right  policy?  
      Moderator:  Micaela  Cirimeli,  Northgate  High  
 
Obama’s  recently  announced  Afghanistan  policy  features  both  a  troop  surge  and  an  incremental  troop  
withdraws  after  an  18-­‐month  period.  Proponents  of  this  plan  argue  that  Obama’s  policy  not  only  helps  
accomplish  the  United  State’s  military  goals,  but  also  prevents  any  possibility  of  becoming  entangled  in  
an  endless  quagmire.  They  believe  that  both  a  troop  surge  and  time  table  are  necessary  for  the  long  term  
stabilization  of  Afghanistan.  A  vocal  opposition  presses  two  chief  criticisms:  some  believe  that  the  troop  
levels  called  for  are  either  too  high  or  too  low;  others  fear  that  announcing  the  withdraw  endangers  
military  strategy  and  American  success.  
 
Salon  7      State  Candidate’s  Forum      
 
State  elections  are  just  hours  away,  and  all  the  candidates  for  Governor,  Lieutenant  Governor,  and  
Speaker  of  the  Assembly  want  your  vote.  Come  to  the  Candidate  Forum  to  hear  them  explain  their  
platforms  one  last  time  and  to  ask  any  questions  that  you  may  have  for  the  candidates  before  the  ballots  
are  cast.    The  forum  provides  a  great  opportunity  to  become  a  more  informed  voter.  After  all,  the  future  
of  Nor  Cal  JSA  rests  in  your  hands.  
 
Ponderosa               Activism  Simulation:  Unfair  Labor  and  Human  Trafficking  in  American  
Agriculture  
 
This  hands-­‐on  simulation  intends  to  uncover  the  exploitative  nature  of  the  American  agricultural  
industry,  and  demonstrate  how  trafficking  is  one  of  many  of  the  unfair  labor  practices  employed  by  the  
industry.  Although  the  topic  of  this  simulation  is  serious,  the  simulation  itself  is  fun  for  participants  and  
candy  is  involved!  
 
Block  3                         11:00-­12:00  
Salon  3     Assembly  
      All  Chapter  Presidents  are  required  to  attend  Assembly.  
 
Salon  4   Resolved:  that  US  government’s  censorship  of  images  of  war  in  the  news  
violates  the  1st  amendment  of  the  Constitution.    
Pro:  Subhashree  Rengarajan,  Foothill  High  School  
  Con:  Marie  Rice,  Bishop  O’Dowd  
  Moderator:  Nick  Wallace,  Alternative  Family  Education  
 
Recently,  T-­‐shirt  makers  and  photojournalists  alike  have  been  chastised  for  using  information  and  
pictures  associated  with  dead  soldiers.  Photos  of  dead  soldiers  have  been  shared  and  then  retracted  for  a  
number  of  reasons.  Veteran  parents  claim  that  the  use  of  photos  of  their  children  is  offensive  and  should  
be  protected  by  libel  laws,  and  army  officials  assert  that  the  sharing  of  these  photos  violates  national  
security.  Defenders  say  that  these  pictures  are  clearly  protected  by  the  1st  amendment,  and  that  the  
reasoning  that  the  pictures  endanger  national  security  is  faulty.  Additionally,  they  claim  that  parents  of  
dead  soldiers  cannot  control  who  uses  pictures  of  the  soldiers  in  question.  
 
Salon  5   Resolved:  that  the  US  authorize  air-­strikes  on  Iran's  nuclear  facilities  if  Iran  
does  not  halt  production  of  uranium.  
Pro:  Govinda  Dasu,  The  Harker  School    
    Con:  Alex  Lee,  Lynbrook  High  School  
    Moderator:  Aaron  Alokozai,  Castro  Valley  High  School  
 
Recently,  Iran  has  declared  itself  a  “nuclear  state.”  It  currently  possesses  the  ability  to  enrich  uranium  to  
levels  past  20%,  and  many  believe  that  it  can  therefore  create  nuclear  weapons  using  existing  plants.  
President  Mahmoud  Ahmadinejad  has  announced  that  Iran  will  continue  to  enrich  uranium  for  use  in  
Iranian  hospitals,  as  part  of  radioisotope  treatments.  Dissenters  say  that  Iran  is  disguising  a  weapons  
program,  say  that  if  we  do  not  remove  Iran’s  nuclear  program  or  severely  weaken  it  then  we  run  the  risk  
of  a  nuclear  attack,  and  say  that  diplomacy  has  not  yielded  any  results.  Defenders  of  Iran  say  that  recent  
nuclear  developments  are  peaceful,  that  no  evidence  of  weapons  manufacturing  has  been  found,  that  
starting  a  conflict  with  Iran  for  their  use  of  nuclear  power  and  research  would  not  end  well,  and  that  
diplomatic  efforts  have  not  been  exhausted.    
 
Salon  6   Resolved:  that  the  US  double  its  reliance  on  Nuclear  Power  over  the  next  thirty  
years  
Pro:  Mallory  Craig-­Kairm  
    Con:  Lisbeth  Perdue,  Central  High  
    Moderator:  Kathleen  Sun,  Lynbrook  High  School  
 
Reliance  on  fossil  fuels  continues  to  be  a  source  of  controversy  among  the  American  public  due  to  
greenhouse  gas  emissions  and  the  instability  inherent  in  relying  on  foreign  countries  for  our  energy  
needs.  One  solution  proposed  is  that  the  government  build  nuclear  power  plants  to  reduce  our  
dependence  on  oil.  Opponents  argue  that  while  nuclear  power  plants  produce  a  large  amount  of  energy,  
there  are  drawbacks  to  using  them.  Opponents  point  to  the  exorbitant  capital  costs,  the  dangers  of  
nuclear  management  and  nuclear  waste,  and  the  even  higher  cost  of  using  the  radioactive  fuel  efficiently.  
On  the  other  hand,  proponents  argue  that  technology  that  would  allow  more  cost-­‐efficient  radioactive  
power  production  is  on  the  way,  and  argue  that  that  managing  nuclear  waste  is  not  as  difficult  as  the  
skeptics  believe.  Proponents  point  to  France’s  long  history  of  nuclear  power  generation  and  the  recycling  
of  nuclear  fuel  that  is  currently  illegal  in  the  United  States.  
 
Portland       Resolved:  that  the  US  government  institute  a  tax  on  carbon  emissions  
Pro:  Robby  Gill,  American  High  School  
    Con:  Elizabeth  O’Neil,  Bishop  O’  Dowd  
    Moderator:  Mat  Pang,  Bishop  O’Dowd  
 
Regardless  of  the  validity  of  recent  climate  change  research,  there  has  been  a  call  by  American  citizens  to  
reduce  carbon  emissions  and  use  cleaner  forms  of  energy.  The  benefits  of  having  a  cleaner  energy  
program  include  a  healthier  environment  and  a  better  standing  in  worldwide  diplomacy.  Carbon  taxes  
would  provide  an  incentive  for  companies  to  lower  emissions  by  making  carbon  emitters  pay  more  and  
by  allowing  companies  that  use  cleaner  methods  to  pay  less.  Additionally,  regulation  of  these  taxes  by  the  
government  would  be  simple  and  stable.  Opponents  to  a  carbon  tax  have  said  either  that  the  carbon  cap  
and  trade  system  is  superior,  or  that  the  tax  would  make  US  corporations  uncompetitive  in  the  global  
market  place.    
 
Salon  D       Resolved:  that  California  privatize  its  education  system  
Pro:  Sarah  Siskind,  Piedmont  High  School  
    Con:  Jeannie  Wu,  Pinole  Valley  High  
    Moderator:  Addie  McDowell,  College  Preparatory  School  
 
With  California  facing  another  large  budget  deficit,  one  solution  being  proposed  is  to  privatize  our  
education  system.  Advocates  for  this  option  argue  that  public  schools  are  fiscally  inefficient  and  wasteful  
while  at  the  same  time  are  not  as  effective  at  educating  students  as  private  schools.  Proponents  cite  the  
success  of  charter  schools  and  the  innovation  and  financial  savings  seen  by  successful  charter  schools.  
Opponents  of  privatization  argue  that  access  to  free  public  education  is  a  hallmark  of  American  society  
and  that  privatization  would  privilege  the  wealthy  and  restrict  the  access  of  the  poor.  Critics  of  
privatization  also  cite  that  over  half  of  all  private  schools  are  religious,  a  concern  many  parents  have.    
There  are  also  concerns  about  the  ability  to  manage  the  curriculum  and  enforce  educational  standards  on  
private  schools.    
 
Lunch             12:00-­1:15  
 
Time  to  take  a  break  and  get  something  to  eat!  Mingle  with  your  fellow  convention-­‐goers  while  you’re  
standing  in  line  at  one  of  the  nearby  food  locations.  Check  your  map,  located  at  the  back  of  this  booklet,  
for  ideas.  Make  sure  to  come  back  on  time  for  the  fourth  block  –  you  don’t  want  to  miss  anything  exciting!  
 
Block  4                                                             1:25-­2:25  
   
Salon  3   Resolved:  that  the  federal  government  permanently  nationalize  the  banking  
system  
Pro:  Kevin  Spevak,  Berkeley  High  School  
    Con:  Ellen  Stark,  Maria  Carrillo  High  School  
    Moderator:  Su-­Yee  Lee,  Northgate  High  
 
The  recent  financial  crisis  has  resulted  in  widespread  doubt  regarding  the  effectiveness  and  reliability  of  
a  privatized  banking  system.  Supporters  of  a  nationalized  banking  system  point  out  that  government  
already  bears  a  large  portion  of  the  risk  and  costs  of  banking  system  failures,  so  it  would  only  be  logical  
and  fair  for  the  government  to  control  the  system  as  well.  However,  others  believe  that  nationalized  
banking  would  be  far  less  efficient  and  more  bureaucratic  than  a  privatized  system,  and  although  
temporary  shifts  of  control  may  be  necessary,  permanent  nationalization  would  cripple  banking.  
 
Salon  4     Supreme  Court  Hearing  
 
From  Northern  California’s  Winter  Congress,  seven  pieces  of  student  proposed  legislation  were  passed  
through  to  become  JSA  law.    Now,  the  Supreme  Court  will  hear  Bill  207:  A  Bill  to  Legalize  Marriage  
Equality,  regarding  its  constitutionality.    The  Sponsor  of  the  bill  will  argue  against  the  Solicitor  General  
regarding  why  this  bill  should  remain  as  JSA  law,  with  the  Supreme  Court  Justices  questioning  both  
debaters.  Kristin  M.  Perry  v.  Arnold  Schwarzenegger  is  the  current  case  in  the  US  District  court  
challenging  the  constitutional  validity  of  Proposition  8  that  will  affect  same  sex  marriage  laws  across  the  
United  States.    Perry  v.  Schwarzenegger  parallels  the  JSA  bill  and  the  evidence  used  for  the  district  case  
will  be  vital  to  determining  the  constitutionality  of  Bill  207.    Although  Judge  Walker  of  the  district  case  
has  postponed  closing  arguments  until  he  has  time  to  review  the  evidence,  JSA’s  Supreme  Court  will  have  
a  decision  by  the  end  of  the  block!  Come  join  us  for  our  first  ever  Supreme  Court  Hearing  on  this  highly  
controversial  bill!  
 
Salon  5                   Resolved:    that  the  US  establish  a  policy  of  open  immigration  provided  that  all  
immigrants  register  with  the  INS  before  entering  the  US  
Pro:  Kate  Sylvan,  Pacific  Collegiate  School  
    Con:  Connor  Reed,  Alameda  High  
    Moderator:  Kayla  Grueneich,  Bishop  O’Dowd  
 
The  illegal  immigrant  population  of  the  United  States  in  2008  was  estimated  by  the  Center  for  
Immigration  Studies  to  be  approximately  11  million  people.  Some  believe  that  costs,  delays,  and  
inefficiencies  in  processing  visa  applications  and  work  permits  contribute  to  the  number  of  immigrants  
who  immigrate  without  authorization.  As  of  2007,  there  was  a  backlog  of  1.1  million  green  card  
applications,  and  the  typical  waiting  time  was  three  years.  Opponents  of  open  immigration  strongly  
believe  that  immigrants  create  difficulty  for  the  United  States  by  contributing  to  overcrowding,  straining  
social  services,  and  lowering  Americans’  standard  of  living  by  working  for  lower  wages.  They  also  argue  
that  illegal  immigrants  are  more  likely  to  be  exploited  by  employers  who  do  not  follow  regulations  on  pay  
and  working  conditions.    Proponents,  on  the  other  hand,  note  that  people  are  already  entering  the  
country  illegally  in  enormous  numbers.    They  believe  that  more  open  immigration  would  be  good  for  the  
global  economy,  because  it  brings  workers  to  where  infrastructure  and  knowledge  are  and  allows  the  U.S.  
to  become  more  competitive.  Is  it  time  for  immigration  reform?  
 
Salon  6                   CROSSFIRE:  Resolved:  that  President  Obama  permit  harsher  interrogation  
techniques  in  order  to  prevent  terrorism.  
Pro:  Jacob  Angel,  San  Mateo  High  School  
    Con:  Micaela  Cirimeli,  Northgate  High  
    Moderator:  Hussein  Elbakri  
   
For  years,  the  United  States  has  gone  back  and  forth  over  the  issue  of  whether  to  sacrifice  the  rights  of  
prisoners  in  return  for  information  that  can  be  used  to  save  lives.    In  this  global  age  of  terror,  the  CIA  has  
been  accused  a  number  of  times  of  using  torture  in  order  to  learn  the  whereabouts  of  other  terrorists.    
Supporters  of  harsher  interrogations  argue  that  the  government  should  do  whatever  they  can  in  order  to  
save  innocent  lives,  and  that  as  long  as  the  interrogations  happen  on  foreign  soil,  American  law  does  not  
apply.    Those  opposed  to  these  practices  say  that  the  United  States  should  not  practice  torture  of  any  
form  because  it  is  morally  wrong  and  it  creates  more  terrorists.      

Salon  B     Thought  Talk:  Has  the  advent  of  Globalism  done  more  harm  than  good?  
    Moderator:  Jason  Yu,  Northgate  High  School  
 
In  his  book  The  World  is  Flat,  Thomas  Friedman  explained  that  due  to  new  technology  and  an  increase  in  
overall  accessibility,  the  entire  world  has  become  a  single  global  community.    This  has  caused  the  
distribution  of  jobs  and  capital  to  places  previously  unreachable  by  the  western  world.    Supporters  of  
globalism  argue  that  people  from  all  over  the  world  can  now  achieve  their  dreams  instead  of  being  
confined  to  their  local  communities.    However,  detractors  argue  that  this  change  has  also  spread  hate,  
created  increased  poverty,  and  created  an  environment  of  materialism.    Has  globalism  been  a  positive  or  
negative  change?  

Salon  C         Special  Activity:  Model  UN  


 
The  United  Nations  has  been  an  integral  part  of  international  diplomacy  since  its  establishment  in  1945.    
Now,  it  is  your  turn  to  step  into  the  shoes  of  ambassadors  from  UN  member  states,  and  debate  current  
issues  from  a  different  nation’s  agenda  and  point  of  view.    Draft  resolutions,  negotiate  with  allies  and  
adversaries,  and  resolve  conflicts  that  affect  countries  all  across  the  globe.      
 
Santa  Barbara/Newport      Political  Fair  
 
Head  on  over  to  the  political  fair  where  numerous  political  and  activist  organizations  are  waiting  to  talk  
to  you!  Organizations  such  as  the  Republican  Assembly,  the  Libertarian  Party,  and  the  World  Federalist  
Organization  will  be  in  attendance.  Browse  the  tables,  talk  to  their  representatives,  and  see  what  
interests  you.  If  you  enjoy  political  diversity  and  political  action  this  is  definitely  an  event  for  you  
 
Ponderosa                   Activism  Documentary  and  Discussion:  MSNBC  Undercover:  Sex  Slaves  In  
America    
 
It  is  estimated  that  17,000  young  women  and  girls  annually  are  forced  to  work  in  the  sex  industry  in  the  
U.S.  by  organized  criminals.  These  women,  no  longer  thought  of  as  human  beings,  but  as  dollars  and  
cents,  are  subjected  to  physical,  mental  and  sexual  abuse.  In  this  documentary,  NBC’s  Meredith  Vieira  
goes  inside  the  underground  prostitution  scene  in  the  United  States  as  it  relates  to  human  trafficking.  
   
Block  5                               2:35-­3:35  
 
Salon  3     Crisis  Scenario  
 
Come  join  us  in  a  crisis  scenario  to  delve  deeper  into  political  issues!  Crisis  scenarios  are  innovative  and  
interesting  ways  to  discuss  your  political  views  and  act  out  a  hypothetical  situation.  In  a  crisis  scenario,  
the  group  is  presented  with  a  question  or  scenario.  The  group  is  then  given  possible  solutions  or  actions  
to  take  to  resolve  the  problem.  Acting  as  government  leaders,  watch  as  the  situation  unfolds  and  different  
outcomes  result  based  upon  your  decisions.  A  crisis  scenario  is  an  innovative  and  interactive  way  to  get  
involved  in  JSA,  learn  more  about  politics,  and  discover  what  could  result  if  you  were  making  the  
government’s  decisions.    In  this  crisis  scenario,  you  get  to  decide  what  happens  to  the  future  of  
California’s  education  system  in  the  face  of  drastic  budget  cuts!  Will  you  increase  the  ratio  between  
students  and  teachers?  Combine  elementary  school  classes?  Have  a  shorter  school  year?  California’s  
schools  are  in  your  hands  in  this  crisis  scenario.    
 
Salon  4     Resolved:  that  the  US  take  military  action  against  North  Korea  
Pro:  Jordan  Gorenberg,  Bishop  O’Dowd  
    Con:  Daniel  Sun,  Lynbrook  High  School  
    Moderator:  Su-­Yee  Lee,  Northgate  High  School  
 
North  Korea  and  the  U.S.  have  long  experienced  great  tension.  North  Korea  has  threatened  the  United  
States  with  weapons  and  has  disregarded  peace  treaties  on  numerous  occasions.  The  North  Korean  
government  has  made  clear  that  they  have  a  nuclear  bomb.    One  may  argue  that  the  United  States  has  
already  waited  far  too  long  to  use  military  action,  and  that  if  it  had,  North  Korea’s  weapon  and  plutonium  
would  never  have  been  produced.  Because  of  belated  action,  America  is  now  in  an  even  more  
uncomfortable  situation  with  regards  to  North  Korean-­‐U.S.  relations.  It  should  not  be  ignored,  however,  
that  military  action  against  the  country  of  North  Korea  can  only  come  at  great  costs,  both  to  American  
soldiers  and  South  Korean  soldiers  and  civilians.      
 
Salon  5                     Resolved:  that  Social  Security  be  replaced  by  a  mandatory  individual  savings  
program  
Pro:  Carla  Ramirez,  Richmond  High  
    Con:  Robby  Gill,  American  High  
    Moderator:  Jacob  Smith,  Irvington  High  
 
Social  Security  is  a  social  insurance  program  for  the  elderly  and  those  with  disabilities.  It  is  funded  
primarily  by  a  dedicated  payroll  tax.  During  2008,  total  benefits  of  $625  billion  were  paid  out  versus  
income  (taxes  and  interest)  of  $805  billion,  generating  a  $180  billion  annual  surplus.  An  estimated  162  
million  people  paid  into  the  program  and  51  million  received  benefits,  or  approximately  3.2  workers  per  
beneficiary.  Those  in  favor  of  an  individual  savings  program  over  social  security  argue  that  the  program  
is  unsustainable.  Starting  in  2016,  it  is  projected  that  program  expenses  will  begin  to  exceed  revenues  as  
more  baby  boomers  reach  retirement.  Moreover,  monies  from  the  Social  Security  Trust  Fund  have  been  
borrowed  by  the  Government  for  other  uses,  so  some  of  the  funds  that  should  be  available  to  pay  social  
security  recipients  are  not  really  in  place.    Instead,  the  trust  fund  holds  $2.4  trillion  in  Government  
bonds—essentially  "IOUs"  or  claims  on  the  Government's  general  fund  or  tax  revenues.  This  amount  is  
part  of  the  total  national  debt.    Opponents  of  the  individual  savings  program,  such  as  President  Obama,  
explain  that  social  security  is  a  safety  net  that  is  required  to  keep  Americans  above  a  degree  of    poverty  
that  would  be  destructive  to  U.S.  prosperity.  Private  accounts  will  not  be  as  reliable  as  the  current  
government-­‐run  program,  and  there  is  no  way  to  ensure  they  will  produce  enough  income  to  cover  
elderly  individuals’  needs.  Opponents  also  estimate  that  switching  to  private  accounts  would  require  as  
much  as  $2  trillion  or  more  in  benefit  cuts,  new  taxes,  or  more  debt.  Should  we  privatize  Social  Security?  
 
Salon  6                       Resolved:  that  Congress  remove  foreign  aid  from  the  US  budget.  
Pro:  Ayesha  Patel,  American  High  
    Con:  Chris  Wyman,  Leigh  High  School  
    Moderator:  Elissa  Anderson,  Northgate  High  
 
The  Obama  Administration  has  shown  no  desire  to  reduce  or  remove  foreign  aid  from  the  United  States  
budget.  Instead,  it  aims  to  increase  aid  to  many  nations,  excluding  Latin  America.  The  administration's  
foreign  aid  request  to  Congress  for  next  year  calls  for  a  13%  increase  for  Africa,  a  7%  increase  for  the  
Middle  East  and  a  nearly  60%  increase  for  South  and  Central  Asia,  mostly  for  Iraq,  Afghanistan  and  
Pakistan.    Many  Americans  believe  that  the  United  States  should  focus  its  finances  at  home,  rather  than  
on  taking  care  of  other  countries.  Others  argue  that  America  may  only  maintain  its  standing  if  it  ensures  
the  stability  and  development  of  the  rest  of  the  world.  They  also  argue  that  the  benefits  of  increased  
global  stability  include  concepts  such  as  the  spreading  of  political  freedom,  increased  standard  of  living,  
and  expanding  basic  human  rights.    
 
Salon  C     Thought  Talk:  Did  Obama  deserve  the  Nobel  Prize?  
    Moderator:  Elizabeth  Hall,  Central  High  School  
 
The  Nobel  Prize  Committee  awarded  the  2009  Nobel  Peace  Prize  to  President  Barack  Obama  for  his  
extraordinary  efforts  to  strengthen  international  diplomacy  and  cooperation  between  nations.  The  
Committee  attached  special  importance  to  President  Obama's  vision  of,  and  work  for,  a  world  without  
nuclear  weapons.  The  announcement  inspired  a  wide  range  of  reactions  across  the  nation,  from  pride  to  
confusion  to  outrage.  The  news  also  stirred  up  a  political  firestorm,  with  a  Republican  attack  on  President  
Obama  inspiring  a  dramatic  reaction  from  the  Democratic  National  Committee.  Defenders  of  the  award  
explain  that  President  Obama’s  actions  deserved  this  merit,  for  reaching  out  to  nations  previously  
ignored  or  criticized.  Those  who  believe  he  did  not  deserve  the  award  state  that  the  outreach  has  meant  
nothing,  because  it  has  produced  such  limited  results.  Did  President  Obama’s  actions  merit  the  prize?    
 
Salon  D     Resolved:  that  the  flu  vaccine  be  mandated  for  K-­12  students  in  the  US  
Pro:  Sarah  Sachs,  The  Collegiate  Preparatory  School  
    Con:  Jamila  Ruiz  Lankford,  Alternative  Family  Education  
    Moderator:  Sam  Townsend,  Pacific  Collegiate  School  
 
Most  public  schools  in  the  United  States  require  a  battery  of  vaccinations  before  students  can  attend  in  
order  to  halt  the  spread  of  serious  communicable  diseases.    However,  many  students  still  miss  numerous  
days  of  school  each  year  due  to  seasonal  flu.    Supporters  of  this  resolution  say  that  by  mandating  a  flu  
vaccine,  student  won't  miss  as  many  days  of  school,  which  will  help  their  education  and  maintain  their  
school  district's  funding.    They  also  claim  that  by  mandating  the  flu  vaccine,  the  spread  of  flu  will  
decrease,  which  will  save  hundreds  of  lives  each  year  in  the  United  States.    Those  opposed  to  this  
resolution  argue  that  senior  citizens  and  weaker  individuals  can  better  use  flu  vaccines.    Detractors  also  
point  to  studies  that  show  a  relationship  between  vaccinations  and  increased  risk  of  autism.      
Santa  Barbara                 Political  Fair  
 
Ponderosa   Activism  Documentary  and  Discussion:  MSNBC  Undercover:  Sex  Slaves  In  
America  (Continued)  
 
It  is  estimated  that  17,000  young  women  and  girls  annually  are  forced  to  work  in  the  sex  industry  in  the  
U.S.  by  organized  criminals.  These  women,  no  longer  thought  of  as  human  beings,  but  as  dollars  and  
cents,  are  subjected  to  physical,  mental  and  sexual  abuse.  In  this  documentary,  NBC’s  Meredith  Vieira  
goes  inside  the  underground  prostitution  scene  in  the  United  States  as  it  relates  to  human  trafficking.  
 
Block  6                         3:45-­4:45  
Salon  3       Resolved:  that  California  privatize  its  prison  system.  
Pro:  Tyler  Parsons,  Alameda  High  
    Con:  Mallory  Craig-­Kairm,  Acalanes  High  
    Moderator:  Kapil  Kolhatkar,  Harker  High  School  
 
With  California  prisons  becoming  overcrowded,  and  with  a  lack  of  resources  to  deal  with  overcrowding,  
extending  the  privatization  of  prisons  is  being  contemplated.    Private  companies  in  the  United  States  
already  operate  264  correctional  facilities,  housing  almost  99,000  adult  offenders.  Many  of  these  
privately  run  facilities  are  located  on  the  west  coast,  some  operating  in  California,  and  hold  both  state  and  
federal  offenders.  Proponents  explain  that  private  prisons  are  held  to  a  level  of  accountability,  because  
they  can  be  fined  or  fired,  unlike  their  government  counterparts.  In  a  study  overseen  by  the  director  of  
the  Health  Policy  Center  at  the  Vanderbilt  Institute  for  Public  Policy  Studies,  evidence  indicated  a  cost  
savings  of  $15  million  could  be  achieved  on  a  state’s  yearly  corrections  budget,  by  using  at  least  some  
privately  managed  prisons.  Yet,  opponents’  arguments  are  also  compelling.  A  study  by  the  Justice  
Department’s  Bureau  of  Justice  Statistics  found  that  the  cost-­‐savings  promised  by  private  prisons  “have  
simply  not  materialized.”    Further,  cost  estimates  from  privatization  advocates  may  be  misleading,  
because  private  facilities  often  refuse  to  accept  the  inmates  that  cost  the  most  to  house.  
 
Salon  4   Philosophical  Resolved:  Friedrich  Nietzche  versus  Voltaire—Resolved:  that  
humans  are  inherently  evil    
Pro:  William  Shearer,  York    
  Con:  David  Mather,  Alternative  Family  Education  
  Moderator:  Julia  Pascoe,  San  Mateo    
 
Friedrich  Nietzsche  was  the  greatest  progenitor  of  existentialist  philosophy.  A  harsh  critic  of  Christianity,  
Nietzsche  famously  declared  “God  is  Dead”  and  castigated  religion  for  its  promulgation  of  a  “slave-­‐
morality,”  in  which  an  over-­‐bearing  society  allowed  the  strong  to  subjugate  the  weak.  Nietzsche  believed  
that  the  most  basic  desire  for  all  people  was  man’s  “will  to  power”,  which  would  trump  all  other  desires,  
even  that  for  survival,  Nietzsche  argued,  as  man’s  capacity  for  warfare  demonstrated.  He  argued  that  to  
achieve  true  awareness,  humans  must  rise  above  their  current  social  order  to  be  come  ubermenschen  or  
super/over  -­‐men.  Francois  Marie  Arouet,  better  known  by  his  pen-­‐name  Voltaire,  was  the  most  famous  
philosophe  of  the  Enlightenment  Period  in  18th  century  Europe.  Known  for  his  satirical  wit,  Voltaire  is  
remembered  for  influential  works  such  as  Candide  and  his  faith  in  human  progress  through  societal  
reform.  Skeptical  of  organized  religion,  Voltaire  instead  subscribed  to  Deism,  a  belief  in  a  god  without  an  
organized  religion.    Though  a  champion  of  governmental  reform  and  increased  civil  liberties,  Voltaire  
feared  the  potential  manipulation  of  ignorant  revolutionary  mobs,  and  instead  advocated  Enlightened  
Absolutism,  in  which  a  powerful  ruler  would  rule  in  the  benefit  of  his  or  her  subjects.  While  Nietzsche  
feels  that  society  is  an  inherently  evil  and  oppressive  institution  that  must  be  overcome  by  a  fundamental  
evolutionary  paradigm-­‐shift,  Voltaire  has  faith  in  the  ability  of  mankind  to  live  in  happiness  in  a  world  
with  a  reformed  society.  Who  will  prevail  in  this  philosophical  debate?  
 
Salon  5   Resolved:  that  the  US  continue  to  use  Guantanamo  Bay  to  detain  enemy  
combatants  
Pro:  Brian  Weikel,  American  High  
    Con:  Camila  McHugh,  Castilleja  High  School  
    Moderator:  Lias  Djili,  Berkeley  High  School  
 
Guantanamo  Bay  is  a  detainment  facility  of  the  United  States  located  on  the  island  of  Cuba,  which  was  
been  in  operation  since  2002.  This  facility  is  used  to  hold  suspected  terrorists,  primarily  those  associated  
with  Al  Qaeda  and  other  terror  networks.  Because  the  facility  is  in  Cuba,  American  due  process  of  law  
does  not  apply.  The  future  of  the  facility  remains  in  question.    On  January  22,  2009,  President  Obama  
ordered  the  military  to  suspend  prosecutions  of  Guantanamo  Bay  detainees  for  120  days,  in  order  to  
review  all  the  detainees'  cases  to  determine  whether  and  how  each  should  be  prosecuted.  A  day  later,  
President  Obama  signed  an  executive  order  stating  that  Guantanamo  Detention  Camp  would  be  closed  
within  the  year.  Those  against  the  use  of  the  prison  say  that  it  infringes  upon  both  international  and  
American  law.  Proponents  of  the  facility  explain  that  if  shut  down,  the  inmates  will  have  no  other  place  to  
be  housed.  Other  countries,  and  other  parts  of  the  United  States,  may  not  be  comfortable  with  the  thought  
of  possible  terrorists  housed  nearby.    The  one-­‐year  deadline  was  not  met,  and  the  question  remains  
whether  the  facility  should  be  closed.  
 
Salon  6   Resolved:  that  full  body  scans  by  the  TSA  are  an  unreasonable  search  and  
seizure.  
Pro:  William  Du,  Bishop  O’Dowd      
    Con:  Lisbeth  Perdue,  Central  
    Moderator:  Mia  Shackelford,  Lowell  High    
 
Full-­‐body  screening  at  airports  became  particularly  relevant  after  the  December  25,  2009  attempted  
terrorist  attack,  in  which  a  Nigerian  man  on  a  Northwest  Airlines  flight  from  Amsterdam  to  Detroit  tried  
to  detonate  an  explosive  device  that  was  stitched  into  his  underwear.  Since,  an  effort  has  been  made  to  
eliminate  a  potential  terrorist’s  ability  to  carry  weapons  underneath  clothing  onto  a  plane.  One  proposal  
to  eliminate  this  threat  is  full-­‐body  scanners,  which  have  already  been  put  in  place  in  a  number  of  
airports  around  the  world.  These  machines  essentially  take  an  x-­‐ray  picture  of  a  passenger  and  see  under  
clothing  to  detect  any  potential  weapons  or  bombs  on  a  body.  Many  believe  that  such  a  system  could  have  
detected  the  "Christmas  Day  Bomber”  and,  in  the  broader  fight  on  terrorism,  have  the  potential  to  thwart  
future  similar  attacks.  Opponents  consider  the  scans  an  intrusion  on  the  privacy  of  passengers,  because  
they  allow  screeners  to  view  an  outline  of  genitalia  and  bodily  contours.  This  is  of  particular  concern  with  
individuals  with  cultural  and  religious  sensitivities  to  such  images.  Are  full  body  scans  an  unreasonable  
search  or  a  necessary  measure?  
 
Salon  C   Resolved:  that  the  federal  government  impose  additional  taxes  on  
internationally  outsourced  labor  in  order  to  bring  jobs  back  to  the  US.  
Pro:  Cecily  Montgomery,  Lowell  High  School  
    Con:  Indranil  Bora,  Lynbrook  High  School  
    Moderator:  Emily  Bliven,  Alameda  High  
 
When  corporations  headquartered  in  the  U.S.  outsource  jobs  to  other  nations  where  labor  is  cheaper,  
their  profitability  increases.    This  should  result  in  higher  income  taxes  being  paid  by  the  corporations.    It  
also  results,  however,  in  the  loss  of  American  jobs.  Workers  who  lose  employment  rely  more  on  
government  services,  such  as  food  stamps,  Medicaid,  and  unemployment  benefits.    In  addition,  jobs  and  
industries  that  are  outsourced  overseas  rarely  return  to  the  U.S.  and  thus  require  retraining  of  the  
workers.    Additional  taxes  would  help  ease  this  burden  on  our  overtaxed  social  services  network.  
 
Salon  A           Thought  Talk:  Will  the  US  still  be  the  world  hegemon  in  10  years?  
    Moderator:  Carla  Ramirez,  Richmond  High  School  
 
Since  the  end  of  World  War  II,  the  United  States  has  enjoyed  its  status  as  a  world  superpower,  and,  since  
the  end  of  the  Cold  War,  its  throne  as  the  world  hegemon.  However,  new  challenges  threaten  to  remove  
the  U.S.  from  its  place  as  the  world’s  sole  superpower.  America’s  fiscal  policy  over  the  past  decade  has  
resulted  in  an  unprecedented  deficit  that  now  totals  more  than  80%  of  its  GDP.  The  dollar  faces  the  
prospect  of  losing  its  status  as  the  world’s  reserve  currency,  an  eventuality  that  could  cripple  the  our  
ability  to  finance  our  government  through  debt.  Two  nearly  decade-­‐long  wars  have  stretched  the  United  
States’  military  and  fiscal  resources  thin,  and  the  resurgence  of  diplomatically  belligerent  rogue  states  
across  the  globe  comes  at  a  time  when  the  U.S.  is  uniquely  ill  equipped  to  deal  with  its  adversaries.  The  
rise  of  China  also  threatens  to  eclipse  the  U.S.’s  power  to  influence  the  world.  At  the  same  time,  America  
has  recently  inaugurated  a  globally  beloved  President,  and  is  arguably  succeeding  in  its  military  
adventures.  The  United  States’  military  remains  the  undisputed  global  leader  in  strength  and  quality,  
with  the  best  equipment  of  any  fighting  force  in  the  world.  What  remains  to  be  seen  is  whether  or  not  the  
US  can  still  wield  de-­facto  rule,  through  “soft-­‐power”  across  the  globe,  at  a  time  when  its  rivals  are  
challenging  its  influence.  
 
Santa  Barbara   Political  Fair  
 
Ponderosa             Activism  Wrap-­Up:  Continuing  Our  Fight  
 
As  the  school  year  dies  down,  it’s  easy  to  forget  all  that  you  have  learned  about  human  trafficking  this  
past  year  and  to  put  the  27  million  enslaved  people  in  the  back  of  your  mind.  But  just  because  JSA  
Activism  will  introduce  a  new  cause  next  year  doesn’t  mean  you  should  forget  about  our  2009-­‐10  project.  
In  this  informational  session,  Activism  Director  Ava  Ghezelayagh  will  go  through  the  many  ways  you  can  
continue  to  fight  modern  day  slavery  despite  the  school  year’s  end.    
 
State  Elections                       4:55-­6:35  
California  Ballroom  
 
Dinner                                 6:35-­7:50  
 
Time  to  take  a  break  and  get  something  to  eat!  Mingle  with  your  fellow  convention-­‐goers  while  you’re  
standing  in  line  at  one  of  the  nearby  food  locations.  Check  your  map,  located  at  the  back  of  this  booklet,  
for  ideas.  Make  sure  to  come  back  on  time  for  the  Chapter/Regional  Caucuses  –  you  don’t  want  to  miss  
anything  exciting!  
 
Chapter/Regional  Caucus:                     8:00-­8:30    
GCR         Salon  3  
GGR         Salon  6  
EBR         Salon  4  
CVR         Salon  7  
 
Teacher  Advisor  Reception                   8:30-­9:45  
Suite  1242  
 
After  a  long  day  supervising  debates  and  coaching  your  students,  please  join  us  for  some  coffee  and  
dessert  as  we  say  thank  you  for  a  great  year!  
 
Night  Activities                              
Grand  Ballroom                       Governor’s  Ball               9:00-­12:00  
 
After  a  full  day  of  hardcore  debating  and  electing  your  new  governor,  it's  time  to  get  your  groove  on!    Join  
your  fellow  delegates  for  the  dance  you've  been  waiting  all  day  for  and  dance  ‘til  midnight!  All  delegates  
must  wear  their  nametag  in  order  to  be  admitted.    
 
Portland       Game  Room                                           9:30-­11:30  
 
Socialize,  take  a  break  from  other  the  dance,  or  become  the  poker  king/queen!    Don't  forget  to  stop  by  
this  JSA  classic  for  board  games,  cards,  and  more.  
 
Newport   Movie                                                                                                                                                   9:00-­11:00  
 
Not  in  the  mood  to  dance?  Join  in  on  the  adventure  of  high-­‐schooler  Ferris  Bueller.  He  knows  everyone  -­‐-­‐  
and  every  trick  to  faking  an  illness.  So  with  the  entire  school  convinced  he's  at  death's  door,  Bueller  grabs  
his  girlfriend  and  best  friend  and  hits  the  streets  of  Chicago  for  a  well-­‐deserved  day  off.  Fed-­‐up  principal  
Ed  Rooney  is  determined  to  catch  Bueller  and  put  a  premature  end  to  his  field  trip.  But  it's  tough  to  
outfox  Ferris.  So  come  on  in  and  watch  this  classic  80's  comedy  with  fellow  JSAers.    
 
Ponderosa       Governor’s  Roast                                           9:30-­10:00  
 
This  one  time,  at  JSA  summer  camp...ready  to  see  another  side  of  Jessica  Du?    Now  that  Jess  is  officially  a  
‘lame-­‐duck’  Governor,  come  see  what  everyone  really  thought  of  her!  Join  this  year’s  graduating  
leadership,  as  well  as  next  year’s  rising  leaders,  as  they  “roast”  our  Governor  with  funny  anecdotes  and  
even  share  a  few  of  your  own!  
 
Curfew                              12:15    
No  one  is  allowed  outside  of  his  or  her  rooms  past  12:15  am.  
 
                             
Sunday,  April  25,  2009  
Breakfast                         8:30-­9:30  
 
Luggage  Storage                       8:00-­9:30  
All  luggage  must  be  stored  in  Salon  D  under  the  first  letter  of  your  school’s  name  and  keys  returned  to  
your  Teacher  Advisor  by  9:30  a.m.      
 
Regional  Elections                       9:35-­10:45  
GCR         Salon  3  
GGR         Salon  6  
EBR         Salon  4  
CVR         Salon  7  
                                                               
Block  7                         10:50-­11:50  
Salon  4       Resolved:  that  the  United  States  ban  smoking  in  all  public  places  
Pro:  Kayla  Grueneich,  Bishop  O’Dowd  
    Con:  Carla  Ramirez,  Richmond  High  School  
    Moderator:  Theresa  Gupta,  American  High  School  
 
In  2006,  Belmont,  CA  became  the  first  city  in  the  United  States  to  ban  smoking  in  all  public  places.  The  
conflict  between  personal  freedom  and  societal  welfare  remains  a  key  issue  in  the  smoking  restriction  
debate,  as  the  government’s  role  in  one’s  personal  life  is  weighed  with  the  detrimental  health  effects  of  
second  and  third-­‐hand  smoke.  Those  who  oppose  the  resolution  contend  that  banning  smoking  in  public  
places  because  of  its  potential  danger  to  others  represents  a  slippery  slope  of  government  interference.  
By  the  same  anti-­‐smoking  logic,  many  opponents  contend  a  host  of  other  things,  such  as  applying  makeup  
or  listening  to  the  radio  while  driving  could  be  banned  as  they  pose  increased  health  risks  to  those  
around  the  person  partaking  in  the  action.  On  which  side  of  the  line  between  societal  welfare  and  
individual  freedom  should  smoking  in  public  fall?  
 
Salon  5   Activism  Debate:  Resolved:  that  the  United  States  eliminate  diplomatic  
immunity  for  cases  of  human  trafficking  and  violent  crimes.  
Pro:  Sandra  Luo,  Foothill  High  School  
    Con:  Heraa  Hasnat,  Mercy  High  School  
    Moderator:  Addie  McDowell,  The  College  Preparatory  School  
 
Since  the  Vienna  Convention  on  Diplomatic  Relations  in  1961,  the  principle  of  diplomatic  immunity,  an  
agreement  between  governments  to  give  diplomats  safe  passage  without  susceptibility  to  lawsuit  or  
prosecution  under  the  host  country’s  laws,  has  been  solidified  in  international  law.  However,  diplomatic  
immunity  has  encountered  criticism  for  the  double  standard  it  permits  by  allowing  flagrant  abuse  to  go  
unpunished.  Supporters  of  immunity  contend  that  often-­‐times  an  abusing  diplomat’s  home-­‐country  will  
voluntarily  revoke  his  or  her  diplomatic  immunity  or  prosecute  the  diplomat  in  their  home  country.    
Should  this  decades  old  tenant  of  diplomacy  be  revisited?  
 
Salon  6   Resolved:  that  Congress  reclaim  its  right  to  declare  war  by  cutting  off  funding  
for  all  large  military  operations  that  take  place  without  a  declaration  of  war.  
Pro:  Hussien  Elbakri,  York  
    Con:  Daniel  Lavezzo,  Tamalpais  High  School  
    Moderator:  Teo  Lamiot,  York    
 
The  Constitution  states  that  Congress  has  the  sole  power  to  declare  war.  Though  Congress  has  passed  a  
series  of  bills  in  attempts  to  reclaim  their  power,  the  Presidency  still  possesses  considerable  military  
powers  that  some  believe  are  excessive.  Advocates  of  this  resolution  insist  that  the  United  States  has  
engaged  in  excessive  military  action  and  that  restoring  Congress’  power  to  declare  war  curtails  this  
problem.  Critics  argue  that  Presidential  military  action  is  not  only  justified,  but  necessary  as  well  to  
quickly  respond  to  international  threats.  They  also  point  out  the  arguably  positive  effects  of  the  first  Gulf  
War,  intervention  in  Bosnia,  and  other  historical  instances  of  presidential  power.  
 
Seattle     “Chapter  of  the  Year”  presentations:  
 
Teacher-­‐Advisors,  please  join  us  to  hear  “Chapter  of  the  Year”  presentations  from  chapter  presidents.    All  
Teacher/Advisors  have  a  vote  for  the  E.  A.  Rogers  Award  for  the  Outstanding  Chapter  of  the  Year  award  
winner.  All  chapter  presidents  vying  for  the  award  are  invited  to  make  a  five  minute  presentation.    
Winner  will  receive  a  $1000  scholarship  to  Summer  School  and  a  FREE  Private  T/A  room  for  all  three  
conventions  next  year.    A  continental  breakfast  will  be  served.  
 
Salon  D         Thought  Talk:  Should  the  US  take  action  to  ensure  human  rights  in  Sub-­
Saharan  Africa?  
    Moderator:  Sonja  Kasky,  York  
 
Since  de-­‐colonization,  military  dictators,  rampant  international  and  civil  warfare,  and  genocide  have  
plagued  Sub-­‐Saharan  Africa.  All  of  these  factors  have  combined  to  produce  an  environment  with  one  of  
the  worst  human  rights  traditions  in  the  world.  While  the  US  is  active  in  working  to  economically  develop  
many  Sub-­‐Saharan  African  nations,  its  role  in  exposing  and  eliminating  human  rights  abuses  has  been  
relatively  limited.  Should  the  US  take  a  more  active  role  in  preventing  human  rights  abuses?  Is  it  our  
responsibility  to  do  so  unilaterally?  Is  this  feasible?  If  so,  should  the  US  intervene  economically  or  
militarily?  
 
Salon  E     Workshop:  How  to  get  involved  next  year  
 
Did  you  like  what  you  saw  at  this  convention?  Want  to  participate  in  JSA  more?  If  so,  then  come  learn  
more  about  the  organization  and  how  to  get  involved  next  year.  Get  a  cabinet  application  and  learn  how  
to  contribute  more  to  this  wonderful  organization.  See  you  there!  
 
Portland                 Summer  School  Information/fundraising  meeting  
 
Want  to  learn  more  about  how  you  can  have  the  best  summer  of  your  life?  Come  to  the  JSA  Summer  
School  information  session  and  learn  more  about  the  classes  offered  at  Georgetown,  Princeton  and  
Stanford.    Summer  School  alumni  will  be  there  to  share  some  of  their  favorite  memories.    Already  
admitted?  Find  out  how  you  can  afford  Summer  School  by  learning  about  fundraising  tips  that  really  
work!  
 
Block  8                             12:00-­1:00  
 
Salon  3   Thought  talk:  Should  the  American  political  system  be  expanded  to  allow  for  a  
3rd  major  party?  
    Moderator:  Emily  Bliven,  Alameda  High  
 
In  a  two-­‐party  system,  two  major  political  parties  dominate  voting  in  nearly  all  elections  at  every  level.  
Proponents  of  instituting  a  third  major  party  believe  that  adding  another  party  would  force  coalition  
building  and  bring  new  diversity  to  the  political  system.  They  believe  the  freer  marketplace  of  ideas  in  a  
multi-­‐party  system  would  force  politicians  to  adapt  their  messaging  and  to  become  more  responsive  to  
minority  voices.  It  would  combat  the  “tyranny  of  the  majority”,  in  which  a  party  that  wins  by  a  narrow  
margin  claims  a  mandate,  and  the  interests  of  minority  political  groups  are  never  adequately  upheld.  
Advocates  of  the  two-­‐party  model  argue  that  two-­‐party  governments  are  more  stable  and  better  reflect  
the  mainstream  of  a  country.  In  order  to  remain  competitive  when  there  is  only  one  other  competitor,  
parties  will  tend  to  moderate  their  platforms.  Governments  in  two-­‐party  systems  are  also  more  able  to  
drive  policies.    Often  the  two  parties  represent  key  ideological  divisions  within  society  over  the  general  
direction  of  policy,  and  most  voters  have  little  interest  in  the  minutiae  of  policy.    Would  our  political  
system  serve  the  citizens’  needs  better,  if  it  is  expanded  to  allow  for  a  third  major  party?  
 
Salon  4   Resolved:  that  California  change  its  policy  on  criminal  drug  users  from  
punishment  to  rehabilitation  
Pro:  Mia  Shackelford,  Lowell  High  School  
    Con:  Ben  Goode,  Alameda  High    
    Moderator:  Krissie  Fung,  Pacific  Collegiate  School    
 
California’s  prisons  are  notoriously  overcrowded,  and  drug  offenders  constitute  a  significant  percentage  
of  the  incarcerated.  Many  prisoners  also  return  to  crime  after  their  release,  and  there  is  concern  that  drug  
users  may  be  negatively  influenced  during  their  time  in  prison.  To  try  to  ease  the  burden  on  the  prison  
system  and  turn  drug  users  away  from  drugs  and  more  serious  crimes,  it  has  been  suggested  that  
rehabilitation  replace  punitive  sentences  for  drug  users.  Proponents  argue  that  such  a  change  is  
necessary  in  order  to  solve  the  problem  of  drug  use  instead  of  perpetuating  it  through  a  system  where  
small  offenders  are  pushed  deeper  into  crime  by  needlessly  harsh  punishments  in  an  overcrowded  
system.  Opponents  say  that  such  leniency  on  drug  use  is  unjustified,  that  rehabilitation  is  ineffective,  and  
that  there  are  alternative  methods  of  solving  the  prison  system’s  problems,  such  as  by  privatizing  
prisons.  
 
Salon  6   Resolved:  that  non  denominational  intelligent  design  be  taught  alongside  
evolution  in  public  school  classrooms.  
Pro:  Charlene  Liang,  Armijo  High  School  
    Con:  Makoto  Yuan,  Berkeley  High  School  
    Moderator:  Grant  Rowley,  Benicia  High    
 
Over  the  past  decade,  a  few  school  districts  have  mandated  that  intelligent  design  be  taught  to  high  
school  students.  This  theory  does  not  contradict  evolution,  but  it  does  suggest  the  presence  of  a  higher  
power,  a  controversial  subject  for  the  classroom.  Proponents  of  intelligent  design  argue  that  it  offers  a  
reasonable  supplement  to  the  curriculum,  that  schools  should  be  able  to  decide  on  their  curriculum  
district  by  district,  and  that  students  could  opt  out  of  the  lesson  like  a  sex-­‐ed  class.  Those  against  this  
addition  contend  that  intelligent  design  doesn't  have  a  scientific  basis,  and  that  teaching  religion  in  school  
violates  the  principles  of  separation  of  church  and  state.  Should  intelligent  design  be  taught  in  school?  
 
Salon  7   Resolved:  That  performance-­related  pay  for  teachers  be  mandatory  in  
California  public  schools.  
Pro:  Jason  Yu,  Northgate  High  School  
    Con:  Dong  Yao,  Lynbrook  High  School  
    Moderator:  Shruti  Kannan,  Northgate  High  School  
 
Performance  related  pay  for  public  school  teachers  is  when  teachers  are  paid  according  to  how  well  their  
students  perform  on  state-­‐wide  standardized  tests.  Normally,  public  school  teachers  are  paid  based  on  
years  of  experience  and  education  level.  This  proposal  is  extremely  controversial,  especially  in  California  
due  to  the  lack  of  funding  for  public  education  and  the  recent  lack  of  teachers.  Proponents  argue  that  this  
will  encourage  teachers  to  work  harder,  thus  raising  the  quality  of  education  in  our  states.  Whereas  
opponents  suggest  that  this  legislation  will  only  encourage  corruption  within  teachers  by  changing  their  
student’s  test  grades  as  well  as  not  factoring  in  the  additional  attention  and  work  required  to  have  
children  with  learning  disabilities  or  testing  anxiety  perform  well  on  the  standardized  tests  as  well.    
 
Portland       Summer  School  Interview  Session    
 
Seattle     Activism  Speaker:  Perla  Flores    
 
Perla  Flores  is  the  Director  of  the  Solutions  to  Violence  Program  at  Community  Solutions.  The  Program  
encompasses  services  for  victims  of  sexual  assault,  domestic  violence  and  human  trafficking  as  well  as  
home  visitation  for  high  risk  families.  Ms.  Flores  is  also  Chair  and  Coordinator  for  the  South  Bay  Coalition  
to  End  Human  Trafficking,  a  collaborative  of  community-­‐based  nonprofits  providing  comprehensive  
services  to  victims  of  trafficking  in  the  counties  of  Monterey,  San  Benito,  Santa  Clara,  and  Santa  Cruz.  
Additionally,  she  is  a  Commissioner  for  the  Santa  Clara  County  Domestic  Violence  Council.  In  that  
capacity,  she  is  Chairperson  for  the  Housing  Committee  and  the  South  County  Domestic  Violence  
Committee  that  integrates  domestic  violence  services  with  the  courts,  District  Attorney,  Public  Defender,  
Social  Services  Agency,  medical  providers,  law  enforcement  and  domestic  violence  advocates.  She  is  a  
member  of  the  Police  Victim  Advocacy  Committee  and  the  Domestic  Violence  Immigrant  Survivor  
Committee.    
 
Sierra             Solution  Session    
 
In  a  solution  session,  you  do  more  than  just  discuss  and  debate  controversial  issues  like  in  a  thought  
talk—you  come  up  with  solutions  to  our  nation’s  problems.    Last  summer,  President  Barack  Obama  
announced  plans  for  the  30,000  additional  troop  surge  and  proposed  to  withdraw  American  troops  from  
Afghanistan  in  July  of  2011.    However,  this  past  March,  the  House  of  Representatives,  In  a  bipartisan  
effort,  overwhelmingly  defeated  a  resolution  written  by  Rep.  Dennis  Kucinich  (D  -­‐  OH)  regarding  a  
timetable  for  troop  withdrawal,  supporting  President  Obama’s  strategy  for  first  stabilizing  the  nation  and  
giving  Afghanistan  the  space  it  needed  to  step  up  its  own  security  forces  and  clean  up  its  government.    
How  do  you  propose  that  the  United  States  withdraw  troops  from  Afghanistan?  Come  discuss  the  issues  
and  problems  surrounding  the  conflict.    
 
Lunch                           1:00-­2:15  
 
Time  to  take  a  break  and  get  something  to  eat!  Mingle  with  your  fellow  convention-­‐goers  while  you’re  
standing  in  line  at  one  of  the  nearby  food  locations.  Check  your  map,  located  at  the  back  of  this  booklet,  
for  ideas.  Make  sure  to  come  back  on  time  for  the  last  couple  blocks–  you  don’t  want  to  miss  anything  
exciting!  
 
Block  9                             2:20-­3:20  
Salon  3     Thought  talk:  Do  unions  hurt  American  workers  more  than  they  help  them?  
    Moderator:  Savannah  Van  Leuvan-­Smith,  Saint  Mary’s  High  School  
 
Since  the  beginning  of  the  20th  century,  American  unions  have  been  a  powerful  force  in  the  labor  
markets  of  many  industries.  Unions  have  certainly  made  their  mark  on  history,  and  they  are  sure  to  stay,  
but  less  certain  is  whether  they  are  a  benefit  to  workers.  By  offering  workers  an  organization  through  
which  they  can  negotiate  with  their  employers,  unions  increase  job  benefits,  help  create  a  better  working  
environment  for  their  members,  and  provide  a  unified  front  to  deal  with  parties  other  than  employers,  
such  as  governments.  On  the  other  hand,  unionized  industries  are  often  the  first  to  suffer  from  
outsourcing,  as  employers  turn  to  overseas  labor  to  replace  more  expensive  American  workers.  Unions  
can  also  reduce  the  total  number  of  workers,  since  each  worker  costs  more.  Is  the  overall  impact  of  
unions  beneficial?    
 
Salon  4     Resolved:  that  special  interests  corrupt  the  democratic  process.  
Pro:  Andrew  Tsai,  Lynbrook  High  School  
    Con:  Malena  Savell,  Sierra  High  School  
    Moderator:  Sandra  Luo,  Foothill  High  
 
Special  interests  have  become  an  integral,  if  widely  despised,  part  of  political  systems.  The  influence  of  
special  interests  can  be  found  in  all  aspects  of  politics,  from  political  contributions  to  the  text  of  bills,  and  
the  retired  congressmen  who  often  become  lobbyists.  Those  in  favor  of  special  interests  claim  that  their  
lobbying  is  an  effective  way  to  represent  the  views  of  those  who  might  otherwise  be  marginalized,  while  
those  against  it  believe  that  lobbying  unfairly  influences  the  democratic  process  to  be  favorable  to  those  
with  the  most  money,  and  not  necessarily  the  interests  of  the  people.  
   
Salon  5     Resolved:  that  the  US  legalize  assisted  suicide  for  terminally  ill  patients    
Pro:  Iris  Klotz,  York  
    Con:  Martina  Lim,  Mercy  High  School  
    Moderator:  Ayesha  Patel,  American  High  School  
 
Assisted  suicide  is  defined  as  the  willful  killing  of  a  person  with  their  consent  and  has  become  a  hot  topic  
in  cases  involving  terminally  ill  patients  hoping  to  stop  delaying  the  inevitable.  The  common  use  name  for  
this  “operation”  is  known  as  “Pulling  the  plug”.  Proponents  believe  that  it  is  the  choice  of  the  patients  to  
decide  when  they  should  die  and  the  less  painless  the  better.  Those  against  assisted  suicide  believe  that  it  
is  not  a  person’s  right  to  take  their  own  lives  and  their  lives  belong  to  a  higher  power.  
 
Salon  6                   Resolved:  that  religion  has  no  place  in  politics  
Pro:  Jake  Houser,  Pacific  Collegiate  School  
    Con:  Marie  Rice,  Bishop  O’Dowd  
    Moderator:  Kate  Sylvan,  Pacific  Collegiate  School    
 
The  First  Amendment  separation  of  church  and  state  has  historically  been  interpreted  as  intended  mostly  
to  protect  religion  from  government  encroaches,  but  religion  has  long  held  a  position  of  power  in  the  
political  arena.  Politicians  often  are  eager  to  advertise  their  religious  beliefs,  and  religious  organizations  
such  as  churches  can  have  a  strong  impact  on  politics,  such  as  with  the  church-­‐sponsored  debate  between  
Barack  Obama  and  John  McCain  in  the  2008  presidential  election.  Some  see  this  mixing  of  religion  and  
politics  as  unacceptable,  arguing  that  religion  is  a  personal  issue  that  should  have  no  bearing  on  politics,  
which  is  inherently  public.  Others  say  that  religion  is  acceptable  as  an  aspect  of  politics,  given  that  
religious  beliefs  have  an  undeniable  impact  on  one's  political  beliefs  that  cannot  be  removed.  
 
 
Closing  Session                                3:25-­4:00  
 
 
 
 
 
Save  the  Date  –  Upcoming  JSA  Events  
 
  Are  you  ready  for  the  best  summer  
  of  your  life?  
 
  Do  you  want  to  experience  the  
  college  life  on  campus  at  one  of  the  
  most  prestigious  colleges  in  the  
  United  States?  
 
  Sign  up  for  JSA  Summer  School  
 
today!  
 
 
Georgetown:    
Session  I-­‐June    14th-­‐July  5th  
Session  2-­‐July    12th-­‐August  2nd  
 
 
 
Princeton:  June  
  21st-­‐July  16th  
   
 
  Stanford:  June  28th-­‐July  19th  
   
 
  Beijing  Diplomat  Program:  
   
July  1st-­‐25th    
 
 
 
MAY  MOTION  
BE  RAISED  IF   DOES  MOTION   VOTE  NEEDED  
NAME  OF  THE   PURPOSE  OF   A  SPEAKER  IS   NEED  A   IS  MOTION   TO  PASS  THE  
MOTION  TO  USE   MOTION   RECOGNIZED?   SECOND?   DEBATABLE?   MOTION  

To  correct  an  error  


Rise  to  a  point  of   in  parliamentary   Decision  of  
order   procedure   Yes   No   No   moderator  
To  make  a  
personal  request  
Rise  to  a  point  of   during  the   Decision  of  
personal  privelege   proceedings   Yes   No   No   moderator  
Rise  to  a  point  of   To  ask  a  question  
parliamentary   about  the   Decision  of  
inquiry   proceedings   Yes   No   No   moderator  
To  dismiss  the  
To  adjourn   meeting   No   Yes   No   Majority  
To  pause  the  
meeting  for  a   Only  the  
To  recess  or   specified  length  of   length  of  
caucus   time   No     Yes   time   Majority  
To  take  any  action  
To  suspend  the   contrary  to  the  
rules   established  rules   No     Yes   No   2/3  vote  
To  take  action   Only  the  
To  extend  the   contrary  to  the   length  of  
speaker's  time   pre-­‐set  time  limits   No     Yes     time   2/3  vote  
To  stop  debating  
To  call  the   the  resolution  (or  
previous  question   ammendment)  and  
on  resolution  (or   go  to  the  closing  
ammendment)   speeches   No   Yes   No   2/3  vote  
To  modify  or  
change  the  
To  ammend   resolution   No   Yes   Yes   Majority  
To  introduce  
business  or  
Main  motion  or   present  a  
resolution   resolution   No   Yes   Yes   Majority  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Anda mungkin juga menyukai