Summary. Textile materials are used for a variety of dry and wet filtration
processes allowing either the increase of the purity of the material filtered or the
recovery of solid particles. Typical examples for textile-based filtration processes
are air filtration, process filtration (e.g. solid–liquid separation), industrial effluent
treatment or dehydration of sewage sludges.
Current conventional textile filters consist of natural or human-made fibres with
diameters ranging from a few single to a few ten microns. Small fibres are well
known to provide better filter efficiency which is related to the increase in surface-
area-to-weight ratio. For this reason, nano-fibre filter media enable new levels of
filtration performance for several applications in different environments ranging from
industrial and consumer to defence filtration processes.
Nano-fibres with diameters between 100 nm and 3 µm are readily accessible by
the electrospinning process. Electrospinning uses a high electrical field to draw a
polymer solution (or melt) from the tip of a capillary to a collector. By applying
voltages of approximately 10–50 kV, fine jets of the solution (or melt) can be drawn
to a grounded or oppositely charged collector. The evaporating solvent (or cooling
of the melt) results in fibres that are collected and formed into nano-fibre mats with
adjustable fibre diameters mainly based upon solution viscosity and electrical field
strength.
A broad range of polymers ranging from natural and synthetic organic to inor-
ganic polymers can be electrospun from the solution or melt allowing the genera-
tion of tailored nano-fibre webs for various applications. Furthermore, the nano-fibre
webs may be used as carrier material for subsequent fixation of various substances to
fibre surfaces as well as for their direct implementation into the fibre. This increases
the possibilities for production of, e.g. hygienic functionalised filters or of temper-
ature stable filters with catalytic activity. Hygienic filters produced from cationic
polymers or with incorporated silver can reduce the contamination of air or water
filters with bacteria while temperature stable filters, which can be obtained from
SiO2 -precursor or silica hybrid materials and which are loaded with metal/metal
oxide nano-particles, are destined for air pollution control.
126 K. Schaefer et al.
7.1 Introduction
Fig. 7.1. Increase in papers on the electrospinning in the last decade [20]
7 Nano-Fibres for Filter Materials 127
System parameters
– Polymer properties
Molecular weight, structure and poly-dispersity of the polymer,
concentration, melting point and glass transition point
– Solution properties
Solvent, volatility, viscosity, conductivity, surface tension, pres-
ence of further additives (e.g. salts)
Process parameters
– Ambient parameters
Solution temperature, humidity, atmosphere, air velocity in the
electrospinning chamber
– Equipment parameter
Voltage, field strength, electrode distance and arrangement,
flow rate, delivery volume, needle diameter
Pressure gauge
Pump
Solution
HV
0–50 kV
Taylor cone
Ground
Electrode
substrate
Fig. 7.2. Setup for electrospinning from polymer solutions
128 K. Schaefer et al.
Advantages of nano-fibres:
– Fibre diameter: <3 nm to >50 µm
– High surface area to volume ratio (→ high specific surface)
– High aspect (length to diameter) ratio
– High bending performance
– Flexible surface functionalities
– Ability to control pore size in non-woven fabrics
– Possibility to insert special functionality
A further advantage of electrospinning compared to conventional solvent spin-
ning is that water can be used as solvent. Water-soluble fibres have to be
cross-linked, e.g. by thermal or by chemical cross-linking [13, 20, 25].
These advantages result in great application potentials of nano-fibres
in broad fields such as separation, adsorption, filtration, catalysis, fibre-
reinforced composites, tissue engineering, wound dressings, drug delivery sys-
tems, sensors, cleaning tissues, protective textile and other [18–29].
Nano-fibres can be spun from polymer solutions or from polymer melts.
Larrondo and Manley [30–32] were the first to carry out and report on melt
electrospinning experiments. Working with PE and PP in the early 1980s,
they successfully formed fibres with diameters only as small as the tens of
microns range. Electrospinning from polymer melts has the advantage that
no solvents are needed which have to be removed by evaporation. However, the
melting temperature of the polymers is an important influencing factor for the
applicability of the procedure to produce nano-fibres. In general, nano-fibres
which are produced by melt electrospinning have a higher fineness than those
electrospun from solutions, achieving nano-dimensions by melt electrospinning
is non-trivial (Scheme 7.1).
At DWI, a working group is using melt electrospinning for the production
of nano-fibres or nano-webs for biomedical applications like scaffolds for tissue
engineering, in vitro neuron interactions with oriented electrospun fibres or
others [33–36].
7 Nano-Fibres for Filter Materials 129
Electrospinning
from
Fig. 7.4. Different electrospinning collection systems: (a) single plate configuration,
(b) rotating drum, (c) triangular frame placed near single plate, (d) parallel dual
plate and (e) dual-grounded ring configuration [36]
20 µm 10 µm
7.2.3 Electrospraying
100 µm 10 µm
Fig. 7.7. Nano-fibres produced by electrospinning from PCL solutions (PCL chlo-
roform/ethanol solution) (average fibres in the range of 300–600 nm fineness and the
fine fibres 100–300 nm)
Fig. 7.9. Nano-fibres electrospun from melts of a blend of PEO–PCL and PCL onto
a conventional PET non-woven
7 Nano-Fibres for Filter Materials 133
10 µm 10 µm 10 µm
200 µm 200 µm
10 kV 20 kV
200 µm
30 kV
Fig. 7.11. Influence of voltage on the particle size obtained during electrospraying
of a non-polymeric organic compound
material [20]. NanowebTM can be used for air filtration, e.g. for filtering pollen
or other particles from the air [52]. The big advantage of NanowebTM is, beside
of the optimisation of the filter capacity, the absolutely negligible materials
usage.
In Liberec, the company Elmarco developed in co-operation with the
Technical University of Liberec modified electrospinning technology called
“Nano-spider” which is based on electrospinning from non-water-based poly-
mer solutions [53–55]. Elmarco presented a pilot line at INDEX 05 in
Geneva/Switzerland, to the non-woven industry [55]. The nano-fibre materi-
als of Elmarco are developed for wide use in medical, biological and technical
fields.
Apart from using synthetic polymers bearing special functionalities or spe-
cific add-ons to the spinning solution, chemical and biological functionality
can also be achieved from natural polymers accessible from waste materials.
For example the chitin-derivative chitosan is known to provide antimicrobial
effectiveness [56] or keratin fibres are known for their propensity in binding air
polluting substances by nucleophilic addition, e.g. formaldehyde [57]. This was
the basis for us to investigate natural polymers like chitosan and wool keratins
during electrospinning [25]. Keratins isolated as S -sulpho-keratins cannot only
be electrospun but also allow the reformation of cystine bridges and thus the
fibre stabilisation after reductive removal of the protection group. Chitosan-
bearing nano-fibres or nano-fibres post-coated with chitosan can reduce micro-
bial growth and are potentially interesting for air filtration uses [25]. Fibre
formation with lower molecular weight proteins as well as chitosan needs the
addition of interfering polymers (e.g. PEO) to disturb the rigid association of
chitosan molecules caused by hydrogen bonding. Co-spinning of bio-polymers
and water-soluble polymers requires the use of cross-linkers for fibre stabili-
sation [25].
References
1. A. Formhals, US Patent 1-975-504 (1934)
2. P.K. Baumgarten, J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 36, 71 (1971)
3. J. Doshi, D.H. Reneker, J. Electrostat. 35, 151 (1995)
4. J.N. Doshi, G. Shrinivasan, D.H. Reneker, Polym. News 20, 206 (1995)
5. D.H. Reneker, I. Chun, Nanotechnology 7, 216 (1996)
6. X. Fang, D.H. Reneker, J. Macromol. Sci.: Phys. B 36, 169 (1997)
7. M.M. Bergshoef, G.J. Vancso, Adv. Mater. 11, 1362 (1999)
8. H. Hou, J. Zeng, A. Reuning, A. Schaper, J.H. Wendorff, A. Greiner, Macro-
molecules 35, 2429 (2002)
9. M. Bognitzki, H. Hou, M. Ishaque, T. Frese, M. Hellwig, C. Schwarte,
A. Schaper, J.H. Wendorff, A. Greiner, Adv. Mater. 12, 637 (2000)
10. M. Bognitzki, W. Czado, T. Frese, A. Schaper, M. Hellwig, M. Steinhart,
A. Greiner, J.H. Wendorff, Adv. Mater. 13, 70 (2001)
11. M. Bognitzki, T. Frese, J.H. Wendorff, A. Greiner, Polym. Prepr. (ACS, PMSE)
82, 45 (2000)
12. M. Bognitzki, T. Frese, M. Steinhart, A. Greiner, J.H. Wendorff, A. Schaper,
M. Hellwig, Polym. Eng. Sci. 41, 982 (2001)
13. R. Dersch, A. Greiner, M. Steinhart, J.H. Wendorff, DWI Rep. 127 (2003)
14. R. Dersch, M. Steinhart, U. Boudriot, A. Greiner, J.H. Wendorff, Polym. Adv.
Technol. 16, 276 (2005)
7 Nano-Fibres for Filter Materials 137
15. C.C. Rutledge, M.Y. Shin, S.B. Warner, A. Buer, M. Grimler, S.C. Ugbolue,
National Textile Center Annual Report: November 2000, M98-D01 (2000)
16. D.H. Reneker, A.L. Yarin, H. Fong, S. Koombhongse, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 4531
(2000)
17. J.M. Deitzel, J. Kleinmeyer, D. Harris, N.C.B. Tan, Polymer 42, 261 (2001)
18. T. Grafe, K. Graham, Proceedings of the International Nonwovens Technical
Conference (Joint INDA-TAPPI Conference), 24–26 September 2002, Atlanta,
2002
19. T.H. Grafe, K.M. Graham, Nonwovens in Filtration, 5th International Confer-
ence, Stuttgart, Germany, March 2003
20. A. Greiner, Lecture on “Electrospinning for Biomedical Applications” at DWI
Aachen, Germany, 2005
21. H. Schreuder-Gibson, P. Gibson, K. Senecal, M. Senett, J. Walker, W. Yeomans,
D. Ziegler, P.P. Tsai, Adv. Mater. 34, 44 (2002)
22. L. Huang, R.A. McMillan, R.P. Apkarian, B. Pourdeyhimi, V. Conticello,
E.L. Chaikof, Macromolecules 33, 2989 (2000)
23. G. Verreck, I. Chun, J. Rosenblatt, J. Peeters, A. Van Dijck, J. Mensch,
M. Noppe, M.E. Brewster, J. Control. Release 92, 349 (2003)
24. A. Frenot, I.S. Chronakis, Colloid Interf. Sci. 8, 64 (2003)
25. H. Thomas, E. Heine, R. Wollseifen, C. Cimpeanu, M. Möller, Int. Nonwovens
J. 14(3), 12 (2005)
26. P. Gibson, H. Schreuder-Gibson, D. Rivin, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng.
Asp. 187–188, 469 (2001)
27. M. Jacobsen, Nonwovens Industry (1991), pp. 36–41; cf. also: Chemiefasern/
Textilindustrie 39/91, 868 (1989)
28. E.R. Kenawy, G.L. Bowlin, K. Mansfield, J. Layman, D.G. Simpson,
E.H. Sanders, G.E. Wnek, J. Control. Release 81, 57 (2002)
29. J. Zeng, Meso- and Nano-Scaled Polymer Fibers and Tubes Fabrication, Func-
tionalization, and Characterization. Ph.D. Thesis, University Marburg (2003)
30. L. Larrondo, R. St. John Manley, J. Polym. Sci.: Polym. Phys. Ed. 19, 909
(1981)
31. L. Larrondo, R. St. John Manley, J. Polym. Sci.: Polym. Phys. Ed. 19, 921
(1981)
32. L. Larrondo, R. St. John Manley, J. Polym. Sci.: Polym. Phys. Ed. 19, 933
(1981)
33. D. Grafahrend, Darstellung von Polyethylenglycol-block-Polyester als Basis für
elektrogesponnene Nanofasern/Synthesis of polyethyleneglycol-block-polyesters
for electrospun nanofibres, Diploma Thesis RWTH Aachen (2004)
34. K. Feil, Melt Electrospinning of Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering, Diploma The-
sis, RWTH Aachen (2005)
35. P. Dalton, T. Kuenzel, D. Klee, M. Moeller, J. Mey, Eur. Cell Mater. 7(1), 52
(2004)
36. P.D. Dalton, D. Klee, M. Möller, Polymer 46, 611 (2005)
37. G.I. Taylor, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 280, 383 (1964)
38. G.I. Taylor, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 313, 453 (1969)
39. M. Shin, M.M. Hohman, M.P. Brenner, G.C. Rutledge, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78,
1149 (2001)
40. M.M. Hohman, M. Shin, G. Rutledge, M.P. Brennera, Phys. Fluids 13(8), 2201
(2001)
138 K. Schaefer et al.