COMPLAINT
Plaintiff Global Archery Products, Inc. (Global), as and for its Complaint against
Defendant Jordan Gwyther d/b/a Larping.org and Upshot Arrows (hereinafter collectively all
referred to as Larping), hereby alleges as follows:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1.
This is an action under (1) the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 1, et
seq., for infringement by Larping of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,449,413 and 8,932,159; (2) the trademark
laws of the United States, 15 U.S.C. 1051, et seq., for trademark infringement, false
advertising and unfair competition; and (3) the common laws for the State of Indiana for tortious
interference with contractual relationships, tortuous interference with business relationships,
criminal mischief, and deception.
PARTIES
2.
Global is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
Indiana, having its principal place of business at 101 Archery Way, Ashley, IN 46705.
3.
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Globals claims pursuant to 15
U.S.C. 1121 (actions arising under the Federal Trademark Act); 28 U.S.C. 1331 (federal
question), 28 U.S.C. 1332 (diversity), 28 U.S.C. 1338 (acts of Congress related to trademarks
and pendent claims), and supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367.
5.
This Court has personal jurisdiction over Larping because, inter alia, Larping has
done and continues to do business in the State of Indiana, and upon information and belief,
Larping has committed and continues to commit acts of patent infringement in the State of
Indiana, including offering for sale, selling, making available, and shipping accused products to
customers in Indiana via mail, via its website at www.larping.org and www.upshotarrows.com,
all of which are available to residents in this judicial district. During its investigation into this
matter, Global purchased from Larping products and services accused of infringement herein in
the State of Indiana and within this judicial district. Further, Larping markets, promotes, sells,
and offers for sale the infringing products and has committed the acts of patent infringement,
trademark infringement, false advertising based on false and/or misleading claims, tortious
interference with contractual and business relationships, complained of herein, through sources
such as www.google.com, which is readily available and directed to residents of this judicial
district.
6.
because, inter alia, Globals principal place of business is in this judicial district, the trademarks
in suit are assigned to Global, the Patent-in-Suit, as defined below, is assigned to Global, Larping
is subject to personal jurisdiction in this district, and, upon information and belief, Larping has
committed and continue to commit acts of trademark infringement, false advertising, patent
infringement, and tortious interference with business relationships in this district, including
offering for sale and selling the accused products and services by mail and via its website at
www.larping.org and www.upshotarrows.com within this district.
PATENTS-IN-SUIT
7.
On May 28, 2013, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
lawfully issued U.S. Patent No. 8,449,413 (the `413 Patent), entitled Non-Lethal Arrow,
based upon an application filed by inventors Matthew Reed Lennon and John Jackson. A true
and correct copy of the `159 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
8.
On January 13, 2015, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
lawfully issued U.S. Patent No. 8,932,159 (the `159 Patent), entitled Non-Lethal Arrow,
based upon an application filed by inventors Matthew Reed Lennon and John Jackson. A true
and correct copy of the `159 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
9.
The `413 and `159 Patents generally relate to a non-lethal arrow that is used in
activities marketed and promoted by Global and its authorized licensees under the ARCHERY
TAG trademark.
10.
By assignment, Global is the owner of the `413 and `159 Patents and has the right
TRADEMARKS
11.
Global is the owner of U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,208,868 for the
ARCHERY TAG trademark for use in connection with non-lethal arrows and archery bows,
and face masks for archery. See Exhibit C
12.
Global is the owner of U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,208,868 for the
ARCHERY TAG trademark for use in connection with entertainment services, namely,
organizing, planning and conducting archery related events, competitions, games, sessions and
activities. See Exhibit D.
13.
The ARCHERY TAG trademarks were assigned to Global from Deerspace LLC
Larping is selling and offering for sale in the United States products it refers to as
the Crossbow Bolt, Flat Tip Larp Arrow, Glow in the Dark Larp Arrow, and Round Tip
Larp Arrow (collectively referred to hereinafter as the Larp Arrows). Representative images
of the Larp Arrows are set forth below.
Larping has recently launched a new website in which markets the non-lethal arrows at
www.upshotarrows.com. These arrows, which are depicted below, are also referred to herein as
the Larp Arrows.
11.
Larping is using the ARCHERY TAG trademarks on advertising for the Larp
Larping is using the ARCHERY TAG trademarks as paid key words with one
13.
14.
15.
Upon information and belief, on at least one occasion, Larping placed a paid
advertisement on Google in which Larping stated that the Larp Arrows are Better than Archery
Tag!
16.
Upon information and belief, Larping has not conducted any study or other
detailed independent analysis to support such a statement about the Larp Arrows versus Globals
patented arrows.
17.
Upon information and belief, Larping has used Globals website to gather a list of
Globals licensees.
18.
gathered from Globals website and has attempted to persuade Globals licensees to terminate
their license with Global and use the Larp Arrows instead of Globals patented arrows.
COUNT I
INFRINGEMENT OF THE `413 PATENT BY LARPING
19.
20.
Upon information and belief, Larping has infringed one or more claims of the
`413 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(a) by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling in
the United States, products referred to as the Larp Arrows. Upon information and belief,
Larpings infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(a) is ongoing.
21.
Upon information and belief, Larping has committed the foregoing infringing
monetary damages and is entitled to a money judgment in an amount adequate to compensate for
Larpings infringement, but in no event less than a reasonably royalty, together with interest and
costs.
23.
Global has suffered and will continue to suffer harm and damages in the future
unless Larpings infringing activities are enjoined by this Court. As such, Global is entitled to
compensation for any continuing or future infringement up until the date that Larping is finally
and permanently enjoined from further infringement.
COUNT II
INFRINGEMENT OF THE `159 PATENT BY LARPING
24.
25.
Upon information and belief, Larping has infringed one or more claims of the
`159 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(a) by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling in
the United States, products referred to as the Larp Arrows. Upon information and belief,
Larpings infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(a) is ongoing.
26.
Upon information and belief, Larping has committed the foregoing infringing
monetary damages and is entitled to a money judgment in an amount adequate to compensate for
Larpings infringement, but in no event less than a reasonably royalty, together with interest and
costs.
28.
Global has suffered and will continue to suffer harm and damages in the future
unless Larpings infringing activities are enjoined by this Court. As such, Global is entitled to
compensation for any continuing or future infringement up until the date that Larping is finally
and permanently enjoined from further infringement.
COUNT III
INFRINGEMENT OF FEDERAL TRADEMARKS
29.
30.
4,208,867 for the ARCHERY TAG trademark for use in connection with, as it relates to the
present action, non-lethal arrows. These registrations are now valid, subsisting, uncancelled and
unrevoked.
31.
Continuously since on or about June 4, 2011, Global has used its ARCHERY
TAG trademark in connection with and to identify its non-lethal arrows and to distinguish said
products by, and without limitation, prominently displaying said mark on packaging, advertising,
and promotional materials distributed throughout the United States.
32.
a. The selling, offering for sale, promotion and advertising of non-lethal arrows under
the name ARCHERY TAG of a type almost identical, to the type of non-lethal arrows
offered by Global; and
b. The paid placement of advertising using the ARCHERY TAG trademark as key
words for search engines.
33.
Larpings use of the infringing ARCHERY TAG mark in connection with non-
lethal arrows is without permission, license, or authority of Global and said use is likely to cause
confusion, to cause mistake and/or to deceive a consumer in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1114.
34.
Larpings use of the infringing ARCHERY TAG mark in connection with non-
lethal arrows has been made notwithstanding Globals well-known and prior established rights in
the trademark ARCHERY TAG and with notice of Globals federal registration rights under 15
U.S.C. 1072.
35.
Larpings infringing activities have caused and, unless enjoined by this Court,
will continue to cause, irreparable injury and other damage to Globals business, reputation and
good will in its federally registered ARCHERY TAG trademarks. KM has no adequate
remedy at law.
COUNT IV
FALSE DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN / UNFAIR COMPETITION
36.
37.
Larping has used the designation ARCHERY TAG in connection with non-lethal
a false or misleading representation of fact which is likely to cause confusion and to cause
mistake, and to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of Larping with Global
10
and as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of Larpings products and commercial activities by
Global.
39.
Larpings wrongful activities have caused, and unless enjoined by this Court will
continue to cause, irreparable injury and other damage to Globals business, reputation and good
will in its ARCHERY TAG trademark. Global has no adequate remedy at law.
COUNT V
FALSE ADVERTISING
40.
41.
made false and/or misleading statements of fact that indicate that Larpings non-lethal arrows are
Better than Archery Tag!
42.
Upon information and belief, Larping has made its false or misleading statements
with knowledge of their falsity and/or misleading character, and/or willfully and with reckless
disregard for their falsity or misleading character in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125.
43.
Upon information and belief, Larpings statements will confuse and/or deceive a
segment of its intended audience into believing that Larping has a factual basis to assert that the
Larp Arrows are in fact better than the patented ARCHERY TAG non-lethal arrows.
44.
45.
Larping caused and directed its false or misleading statements to enter interstate
commerce.
11
COUNT VI
TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACTUAL RELATIONS
46.
47.
48.
Larping used Globals website to obtain contact information for its licensees.
49.
Upon information and belief, Larping has contacted Globals licensees and made
false, misleading and/or deceptive statements to Globals licensees to further Larpings own
business opportunities, promote the sale of its products and induce Globals licensees to breach
their contracts with Global.
50.
51.
Larpings actions were harmful, willful, wanton and undertaken with a callous
relationships, Global respectfully requests this Court to enter judgment against Larping in such
an amount to be proven at trial, together with punitive damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment
interest at the highest legal rate, the costs of this action, and all other relief as this Court deems
just and proper.
COUNT VII
TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS
53.
54.
Global has valid and existing business relationships with its licensees.
55.
Larping used Globals website to obtain contact information for its licensees.
12
56.
Upon information and belief, Larping has contacted Globals licensees and made
false, misleading and/or deceptive statements to Globals licensees to further Larpings own
business opportunities, promote the sale of its products and interfere with Globals business
relationships.
57.
Larpings actions were harmful, willful, wanton and undertaken with a callous
disregard to Globals interests and business relationships. Punitive damages in this action against
Larping are appropriate to deter such conduct in the future and to serve the public good.
59.
relationships, Global respectfully requests this Court to enter judgment against Larping in such
an amount to be proven at trial, together with punitive damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment
interest at the highest legal rate, the costs of this action, and all other relief as this Court deems
just and proper.
COUNT VIII
CRIMINAL MISCHIEF
60.
61.
causes another to suffer pecuniary loss by deception or impairs the rights of another person
commits criminal mischief.
62.
Upon information and belief, Larping knowingly and intentionally made false,
misleading and/or deceptive statements to Globals licensees with the intent to further Larpings
own business opportunities and promote the sale of its products in the State of Indiana actions
that caused Global to suffer a pecuniary loss.
13
63.
three times its actual damages, the costs of this action, reasonable attorneys fees, travel
expenses, direct and indirect expenses incurred by Global related to attending any court
proceedings, and reasonable costs of collection.
64.
to enter judgment against Larping in such amount as Global proves at trial, plus treble damages,
the costs of this action, reasonable attorneys fees, travel expenses, direct and indirect expenses
incurred by Global related to attending any Court proceedings, reasonable costs of collection,
pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the highest legal rate, and that the Court grant such
other relief as the Court deems just and proper.
COUNT IX
DECEPTION
65.
66.
the person disseminates to the public an advertisement that the person knows is false, misleading,
or deceptive, with intent to promote the purchase or sale of property or the acceptance of
employment.
67.
69.
three times its actual damages, the costs of this action, reasonable attorneys fees, travel
14
expenses, direct and indirect expenses incurred by Global related to attending any court
proceedings, and reasonable costs of collection.
70.
to enter judgment against Larping in such amount as Global proves at trial, plus treble damages,
the costs of this action, reasonable attorneys fees, travel expenses, direct and indirect expenses
incurred by Global related to attending any Court proceedings, reasonable costs of collection,
pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the highest legal rate, and that the Court grant such
other relief as the Court deems just and proper.
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
71.
That Larping be adjudged to have infringed the `413 and `159 Patents;
B.
affiliates, divisions, branches, parents, and those persons in active concert or participation with
any of them, be permanently restrained and enjoined from directly and/or indirectly infringing
the `413 and `159 Patents;
C.
Global for Larpings past infringement and any continuing and/or future infringement up until
the date that Larping is finally and permanently enjoined from further infringement, including
compensatory damages;
D.
Larping, together with an award of such interests and costs, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 284;
15
E.
TAG trademark;
G.
offering for sale non-lethal arrows using the ARCHERY TAG trademark;
H.
of Larpings acts of infringement, false designation of origin, and unfair competition, together
with interest, and that Globals recovery be trebled, pursuant to Section 35 of the Lanham Act
(15 U.S.C. 1117);
I.
An Order preliminarily and permanently enjoining Larping, and its affiliates and
subsidiaries, and each of their officers, agents, servants, employees, successors, and assigns and
all others in concert and privity with them from using the name ARCHERY TAG or any
confusingly similar version thereof in connection with the offering of non-lethal arrows, from
infringement of U.S. Trademark Registration Nos. 4,208,868 and 4,208,867, from unfairly
competing with Larping, from engaging in unfair and deceptive trade practices and from injuring
Globals business reputation and diluting its trademark rights, pursuant to Section 34 of the
Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. 1116);
J.
An Order directing Larping to file with this Court and serve on Globals
attorneys, thirty (30) days after the date of entry of any injunction, a report in writing and under
oath setting forth in detail the manner and form in which Larping has complied with the
injunction;
16
K.
prosecuting this action, pursuant to Section 35 of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. 1117);
L.
U.S.C. 1125(a);
M.
An Order preliminarily and permanently enjoining Larping, and its affiliates and
subsidiaries, and each of their officers, agents, servants, employees, successors, and assigns and
all others in concert and privity with them from continuing to unfairly compete with Global
through advertisements, letters, promotional materials, articles or oral or written statements
falsely, misleadingly, and deceptively stating that Larpings non-lethal arrows are better than
Globals non-lethal arrows.
N.
profits gleaned from its false, misleading, and or tortuous acts, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117;
P.
An award of treble damages as a judgment against Larping for its willful violation
R.
An award of Globals actual damages, treble damages, costs and attorneys fees
pursuant to the Indiana Crime Victims Act, Ind. Code 34-24-3-1 or, in the alternative, punitive
damages pursuant to the Indiana Crime Victims Act, Ind. Code 34-24-3-3; and
S.
That Global be given such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and
proper.
17
s/Dean E. McConnell
Dean E. McConnell, Esq. Atty No. 20254-49
DEAN MCCONNELL IP Law
9795 Crosspoint Blvd., Suite 185
Indianapolis, IN 46256
Phone: (317) 653-2660
Fax: (317) 653-2661
Email: dean@dean-mcconnell.com
18
Jackson et a].
(54)
NON-LETHAL ARROW
5,033,446 A
7/1991 Bradt
7/1993 Burnham et a1.
2311;131:130
538363842 A
6,076,513 A
11/1998 McLeamn
6/2000 Doherty etal.
6,454,623 B1*
7,601,084 B2
ec.
58
(57)
ABSTRACT
F4&3 (%/04
(200601)
F423 6/08
(2006 01)
U 5 Cl
U'Sc '
'
F, 1d
6/2010 Martin
(51) Int Cl
(52)
* cited by examiner
20063600112233
9/2002
10/2009 Martin
7,731,612 B2
Notice:
5,224,464 A
(*)
US 8,449,413 B1
""
UISPCO
"""
(56)
473/578 582
"""""""""" "
as ca Ion earc
473/578
""""""
""""" h. t
e or comp e e seam
Is my
References Cited
nected with the foam tip connection end. The shaft connec
1,554,653 A
2,377,498 A
1/1925 Poole
1/1944 Jacke
2,531,635 A
8/1948 Manger
3,271,033 A
4,111,424 A
2/1963 Parker
9/1978 Schreiber et a1.
Exhibit A
US. Patent
May 28,2013
Sheet 1 0f6
Exhibit A
US 8,449,413 B1
US. Patent
Sheet 2 0f 6
Exhibit A
US 8,449,413 B1
US. Patent
Sheet 3 0f6
Exhibit A
US 8,449,413 B1
US. Patent
May 28,2013
Sheet 4 on
US 8,449,413 B1
60
[/32
Exhibit A
US. Patent
Sheet 5 0f6
US 8,449,413 B1
5
Fig
Exhibit A
US. Patent
Sheet 6 0f6
36
Exhibit A
US 8,449,413 B1
US 8,449,413 B1
1
NON-LETHAL ARROW
activities.
BACKGROUND
SUMMARY
25
30
connected with the foam tip connection end. The shaft con
35
connection end.
45
FIG.
FIG. 2.
FIG.
FIG.
FIG.
50
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
65
Exhibit A
US 8,449,413 B1
4
3
The foam tip 32 is shaped such that no sharp surfaces are
present on the outer surface of the foam tip 32.
Referring to FIG. 5, another representative form of a tip
connector 30 is illustrated. In this form, the foam tip connec
tion end 34 has a smaller diameter than the previous embodi
ment thereby creating a backstop portion or rim 64. As a
result, an end 66 of the foam tip 32 rests against the rim 64
when the foam tip 32 is inserted over the foam tip connection
hemispherical in shape.
7. A non-lethal arrow, comprising:
end 34. All other features of the tip connector 30 are the same
as previously discussed with the ?rst embodiment.
a shaft;
a nock located on a ?rst end of said shaft;
said shaft;
ered within the scope of the claims that follow and their
15
equivalents.
20
25
shaft; and
a generally cylindrical foam tip connected with said foam
tip connector end.
2. The non-lethal arrow of claim 1, wherein said foam tip
connection end includes a plurality of securing barbs extend
connection end.
8. The non-lethal arrow of claim 7, wherein the foam tip is
Exhibit A
Lennon et a].
(54)
NON-LETHAL ARROW
2,531,635 A
8/1948 Maager
9/1966 Parker
gellgilber et a1~
5,224,464 A
ra
2221131213011
5,836,842 A
11/1998 McLearan
6,076,513 A
6,454,623 B1
9/2002 Flatau
7,601,084 B2
10/2009 Martin
7,731,612 B2
8,012,049 B1
2006/0014598 A1
6/2010 Martin
9/2011 Walterscheid
1/2006 Martin
2006/0276277 A1*
(22) Filed:
3,271,033 A
215;;
'
(*)
US 8,932,159 B2
12/2006
* Cited by examiner
(65)
P '
'
rlmary xamlner
i J hn R~
'
1001
US 2014/0323252 A1
(58)
(57)
ABSTRACT
(2006.01)
US. Cl.
References Cited
(56)
1/1925 Poole
1/1944 Jacke
21\
Exhibit B
US. Patent
Sheet 1 0f8
US 8,932,159 B2
l
Fig.
Exhibit B
US. Patent
Sheet 2 0f8
Exhibit B
US 8,932,159 B2
US. Patent
Jan.13,2015
Sheet30f8
Exhibit B
US 8,932,159 B2
US. Patent
Sheet 4 0f8
US 8,932,159 B2
Pig
4
Exhibit B
US. Patent
Sheet 5 0f8
F30
Exhibit B
US 8,932,159 B2
US. Patent
3b
Sheet 6 0f8
3%
Exhibit B
US 8,932,159 B2
US. Patent
Sheet 7 0f8
US 8,932,159 B2
100
FIG.7
108
102
Exhibit B
107
US. Patent
\IIWI
164
Sheet 8 0f8
11]]
US 8,932,159 B2
\II
1\
[150
F1G.8
162
160
156
152\
Exhibit B
US 8,932,159 B2
1
NON-LETHAL ARROW
art.
activities.
20
SUMMARY
30
35
connected with the foam tip connection end. The shaft con
drical portion. The ?ns taper upwardly from a rear end of the
connection end.
connection end 34. In one form, the foam tip 32 is slid over the
55
60
Exhibit B
US 8,932,159 B2
4
connection end 608. Threading the foam tip 616 to the foam
tip connection end 608 allows the foam tip 616 to readily be
107. In another form, the end 108 of the shaft 102 is secured
in the hollow tube 107 using an adhesive.
In the illustrated form of the non-lethal arrow 100, a foam
ered within the scope of the claims that follow and their
equivalents.
What is claimed is:
1. A non-lethal arrow, comprising:
a shaft; and
a foam tip assembly connected with an end of said shaft,
surround said front end to thereby secure said foam tip to said
tip 110 surrounds and is connected with the entire tip connec
tor 104. In other forms, the foam tip 110 surrounds and is
tip connector.
over the tip connector 104 to create a unitary foam tip assem
bly 111. The foam tip 110 is formed using a soft material such
as a polymerbased foam so as not to injure someone who is hit 45 end of said elongate cylindrical portion to a front end of said
tip connector.
10. A non-lethal arrow, comprising:
a shaft;
to the tip connector 104. In one form, the front end 118 of the
50
gaps between the ?ns 114 thereby securing the foam tip 110
a shaft;
a tip connector including a shaft connection end and a foam
nection end 606 and a foam tip connection end 608. The shaft
connection end 606 is connected with the shaft 602. The shaft
connection end 606 de?nes a hollow interior portion sized a
con?gured to receive an end 612 of the shaft 602. The foam tip
connection end 608 includes a threaded portion 614. A foam
tip 616 is secured to the thread portion 614 of the foam tip
tor.
60
65
Exhibit B
US 8,932,159 B2
5
13. The non-lethal arrow of claim 12, wherein said foam tip
connection end has a generally circular shape.
*
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Exhibit E
Exhibit E
Exhibit E
JS 44 (Rev. 12/12)
except as
provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the
purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)
I. (a) PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS
DeKalb County
U.S. Government
Plaintiff
Federal Question
(U.S. Government Not a Party)
U.S. Government
Defendant
Diversity
(Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III)
DEF
1
Citizen or Subject of a
Foreign Country
Foreign Nation
TORTS
110 Insurance
120 Marine
130 Miller Act
140 Negotiable Instrument
150 Recovery of Overpayment
& Enforcement of Judgment
151 Medicare Act
152 Recovery of Defaulted
Student Loans
(Excludes Veterans)
153 Recovery of Overpayment
of Veterans Benefits
160 Stockholders Suits
190 Other Contract
195 Contract Product Liability
196 Franchise
REAL PROPERTY
210 Land Condemnation
220 Foreclosure
230 Rent Lease & Ejectment
240 Torts to Land
245 Tort Product Liability
290 All Other Real Property
PERSONAL INJURY
310 Airplane
315 Airplane Product
Liability
320 Assault, Libel &
Slander
330 Federal Employers
Liability
340 Marine
345 Marine Product
Liability
350 Motor Vehicle
355 Motor Vehicle
Product Liability
360 Other Personal
Injury
362 Personal Injury Medical Malpractice
CIVIL RIGHTS
440 Other Civil Rights
441 Voting
442 Employment
443 Housing/
Accommodations
445 Amer. w/Disabilities Employment
446 Amer. w/Disabilities Other
448 Education
FORFEITURE/PENALTY
PERSONAL INJURY
365 Personal Injury Product Liability
367 Health Care/
Pharmaceutical
Personal Injury
Product Liability
368 Asbestos Personal
Injury Product
Liability
PERSONAL PROPERTY
370 Other Fraud
371 Truth in Lending
380 Other Personal
Property Damage
385 Property Damage
Product Liability
PRISONER PETITIONS
Habeas Corpus:
463 Alien Detainee
510 Motions to Vacate
Sentence
530 General
535 Death Penalty
Other:
540 Mandamus & Other
550 Civil Rights
555 Prison Condition
560 Civil Detainee Conditions of
Confinement
BANKRUPTCY
422 Appeal 28 USC 158
423 Withdrawal
28 USC 157
PROPERTY RIGHTS
820 Copyrights
830 Patent
840 Trademark
LABOR
710 Fair Labor Standards
Act
720 Labor/Management
Relations
740 Railway Labor Act
751 Family and Medical
Leave Act
790 Other Labor Litigation
791 Employee Retirement
Income Security Act
SOCIAL SECURITY
861 HIA (1395ff)
862 Black Lung (923)
863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
864 SSID Title XVI
865 RSI (405(g))
OTHER STATUTES
IMMIGRATION
462 Naturalization Application
465 Other Immigration
Actions
2 Removed from
State Court
Remanded from
Appellate Court
4 Reinstated or
Reopened
5 Transferred from
Another District
(specify)
6 Multidistrict
Litigation
Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity):
Patent infringement, trademark infringement, unfair competition / false advertising, and related state law claims
DEMAND $
DOCKET NUMBER
s/Dean E. McConnell
10/13/2015
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
RECEIPT #
AMOUNT
APPLYING IFP
Save As...
JUDGE
MAG. JUDGE
Reset
(b)
(c)
Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial) of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, use
only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency and
then the official, giving both name and title.
County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides at the
time of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In land
condemnation cases, the county of residence of the "defendant" is the location of the tract of land involved.)
Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, noting
in this section "(see attachment)".
II.
Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Rule 8(a), F.R.Cv.P., which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an "X"
in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below.
United States plaintiff. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here.
United States defendant. (2) When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an "X" in this box.
Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment
to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code takes
precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked.
Diversity of citizenship. (4) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the
citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity
cases.)
III.
Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Mark this
section for each principal party.
IV.
Nature of Suit. Place an "X" in the appropriate box. If the nature of suit cannot be determined, be sure the cause of action, in Section VI below, is
sufficient to enable the deputy clerk or the statistical clerk(s) in the Administrative Office to determine the nature of suit. If the cause fits more than
one nature of suit, select the most definitive.
V.
VI.
Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional
statutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC 553 Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service
VII.
Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule 23, F.R.Cv.P.
Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction.
Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded.
VIII. Related Cases. This section of the JS 44 is used to reference related pending cases, if any. If there are related pending cases, insert the docket
numbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases.
Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet.
NorthernDistrict
Districtof
of__________
Indiana
__________
Global Archery Products, Inc.
Plaintiff(s)
v.
Jordan Gwyther d/b/a Larping.org and Upshot Arrows
Defendant(s)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.
You also must file your answer or motion with the court.
CLERK OF COURT
Date:
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
; or
I left the summons at the individuals residence or usual place of abode with (name)
, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,
on (date)
, who is
; or
; or
Other (specify):
.
My fees are $
0.00
Date:
Servers signature
Servers address
Save As...
Reset