QUALITY CONTROL
Learning Outcomes:
At the end of this chapter, you should be able to:
i.
ii.
Describe the reasons quality is needed and can be improve using certain
techniques
iii.
Matrix Analysis
e.
Cause-And-Effect Diagram
f. Scatter Diagram
iv.
Generalize the method to form and launch the Quality Control Circle
(QCC)
1.0
ii.
iii.
Provide simple but powerful tools for use in continuous improvement activity.
iv.
JF 608
QUALITY CONTROL
JF 608
There are various techniques in the problem-solving process. The techniques generally
used include the following:
(a) Brainstorming;
(b) Cause and Effect Analysis;
(c) Check sheets;
(d) Pareto Analysis;
(e) Scatter Diagram
(f) Matrix Analysis
1.1.1 Brainstorming
Brainstorming is a technique in which group of people share thoughts and ideas on
problems in a relaxed atmosphere that encourages unrestrained collective thinking. The
techniques/procedure of brainstorming :
i.
Identifying problems
ii.
finding causes
iii.
iv.
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
QUALITY CONTROL
JF 608
Time
8-9
Smeared Loose or
Label
center
////
//
////
9-10
10-11
//
11-12
1-2
2-3
////
3-4
////
Other
Total
Missing Off-
folded
4
/
/(torn)
3
1
////
9
4
A Pareto chart is a bar graph. The lengths of the bars represent frequency or costs are
arranged with longest bars on the left and the shortest to the right. In this way the chart
visually depicts which situations are more significant.
ii.
When there are many problems or causes and you want to focus on the most
significant.
iii.
QUALITY CONTROL
JF 608
i.
ii.
iii.
Decide what period of time the Pareto chart will cover: One work cycle? One full day? A
week?
iv.
Collect the data, recording the category each time. (Or assemble data that already exist.)
v.
vi.
Determine the appropriate scale for the measurements you have collected.
vii.
Construct and label bars for each category. Place the tallest at the far left, then the next
tallest to its right and so on. If there are many categories with small measurements, they
can be grouped as other.
viii.
Calculate the percentage for each category: the subtotal for that category divided by the
total for all categories. Draw a right vertical axis and label it with percentages.
ix.
Calculate and draw cumulative sums: Add the subtotals for the first and second
categories, and place a dot above the second bar indicating that sum. To that sum add the
subtotal for the third category, and place a dot above the third bar for that new sum.
Continue the process for all the bars. Connect the dots, starting at the top of the first bar.
The last dot should reach 100 percent on the right scale.
Example 7.2 : Pareto Chart for Categories of document-related complaints, and shows
cumulative values.
QUALITY CONTROL
JF 608
The cause and effect diagram identifies many possible causes for an effect or problem.
Also called fishbone diagram. It can be used to structure a brainstorming session. It
immediately sorts ideas into useful categories.
ii.
Procedures
i.
Agree on a problem statement (effect). Write it at the center right of the flipchart
or whiteboard. Draw a box around it and draw a horizontal arrow running to it.
ii.
Brainstorm the major categories of causes of the problem. If this is difficult use
generic headings:
a. Methods
b. Machine
c. Manpower (People)
d. Materials
e. Measurement
f. Environment
iii.
iv.
Brainstorm all the possible causes of the problem. Ask: Why does this happen?
As each idea is given, the facilitator writes it as a branch from the appropriate
category. Causes can be written in several places if they relate to several
categories.
v.
Again ask why does this happen? about each cause. Write sub-causes branching
off the causes. Continue to ask Why? and generate deeper levels of causes.
Layers of branches indicate causal relationships.
vi.
When the group runs out of ideas, focus attention to places on the chart where
ideas are few.
QUALITY CONTROL
JF 608
Example7.3 :
This fishbone diagram was drawn by a manufacturing team to try to understand the source of
iron contamination. The team used the six generic headings to prompt ideas. Layers of branches
show thorough thinking about the causes of the problem.
The scatter diagram graphs pairs of numerical data, with one variable on each axis, to
look for a relationship between them. If the variables are correlated, the points will fall
along a line or curve. The better the correlation, the tighter the points will hug the line.
ii.
When trying to determine whether the two variables are related, such as
iii.
iv.
QUALITY CONTROL
JF 608
Procedures:
i.
ii.
Draw a graph with the independent variable on the horizontal axis and the
dependent variable on the vertical axis. For each pair of data, put a dot or a
symbol where the x-axis value intersects the y-axis value. (If two dots fall
together, put them side by side, touching, so that you can see both.)
iii.
Look at the pattern of points to see if a relationship is obvious. If the data clearly
form a line or a curve, you may stop. The variables are correlated. You may wish
to use regression or correlation analysis now.
QUALITY CONTROL
JF 608
Also called: Decision matrix, Pugh matrix, decision grid, selection matrix or grid,
problem matrix, problem selection matrix, opportunity analysis, solution matrix, criteria
rating form, criteria-based matrix.
ii.
iii.
After the list of options has been reduced to a manageable number by list
reduction.
i)
ii)
ii.
iii.
Procedures
i.
Brainstorm the evaluation criteria appropriate to the situation.
ii.
Discuss and refine the list of criteria. Identify any criteria that must be included
and any that must not be included
iii.
Assign a relative weight to each criterion, based on how important that criterion is
to the situation. Do this by distributing 10 points among the criteria.
iv.
Draw an L-shaped matrix. Write the criteria and their weights as labels along one
edge and the list of options along the other edge.
v.
Evaluate each choice against the criteria. There are three ways to do this:
Steps:
Establish a rating scale for each criterion.
1, 2, 3:
1 = slight extent, 2 = some extent, 3 = great extent
1, 2, 3:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5:
1 = little to 5 = great
1, 4, 9:
1= low, 4 = moderate, 9 = high
Multiply each options rating by the weight. Add the points for each option. The option
with the highest score will not necessarily be the one to choose, but the relative scores
can generate meaningful discussion and lead the team toward consensus
QUALITY CONTROL
JF 608
+
=
-
Increase Menu
Choices
Decrease
Menu Prices
Add Staff
Increase
Budget for
Decorations
Improve
Quality of
Service
OPTIONS
TOTAL
Improve
Quality of
Food
FACTORS
Food
Staff
Atmosphere
High (5)
Medium (3)
Low (1)
+
=
-
Increase
Budget for
Decorations
High (5)
Medium (3)
Low (1)
Increase Menu
Choices
Add Staff
+
-
Improve
Quality of
Service
OPTIONS
Improve
Quality of
Food
FACTORS
Food
Staff
Atmosphere
Decrease
Menu Prices
2.1
Definition
QUALITY CONTROL
JF 608
A Quality Control circle is a small group of workers (6-10 persons) from the same work
unit who meet regularly to identify, select and analyst work-related problems. The group
then put forwards suggested solutions to the Management for consideration and
decision.
2.2
Objective
The objective of QCC is to improve and upgrade quality of work through:
(a) The problem solving capability of the workers;
(b) Team work;
(c) The cultivation and assimilation of positive values and work ethics;
(d) Involvement and interest in work;
(e) High motivation for work; and
(f) Awareness of responsibility towards oneself, the group, the department/office and
the nation..
2.3
QUALITY CONTROL
JF 608
Benefits of QCC
Numerous benefits can be obtained through the implementation of QCC. Among these
are:
(a) Closer relationship between the workers and Management;
(b) Cultivation of cooperation among workers;
(c) Job satisfaction;
(d) Increased motivation to work;
(e) Building of self-confidence;
(f) Development of leadership among workers;
(g) Encouragement of creativity among workers; and
(h) Improvement of systems and work procedures..
2.5
Implementation of QCC
The prerequisites necessary for implementing QCC are:
(a) Establishment of a QCC structure;
(b) Effective training; and
(c) Effective recognition system..
2.6
QCC Structure
The QCC structure as being practised currently consists ofcomponents as shown in
Diagram 1 namely:
(a) QCC Steering Committee;
(b) Facilitators;
(c) Quality Circle Leaders; and
(d) Quality Circle Members..
QUALITY CONTROL
JF 608
2.6.2 Facilitators
Facilitators are chosen from among Heads of Divisions or workers selected by the
Management. These facilitators are responsible for one or more QCC. The roles of the
facilitators are as follows:
i.
and assistance;
ii.
where required;
iii.
iv.
v.
As a mediator in problem-solving;
vi.
Evaluating the costs and benefits of the QCC program and reporting to the
Management..
ii.
Responsible for the smooth operation of QCC activities and fostering the
spirit of management presentations;
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
vii.
viii.
QUALITY CONTROL
2.6.4 Members
The QCC members have the following roles;
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
Facilitator
Facilitator
----------------------------------------------|
Circle
Circle
Leaders
Leaders
|
Circle
Circle
Leaders
Leaders
|
-------------------------------------------------------------|
|
Members
JF 608
QUALITY CONTROL
JF 608
Step 1 : Plan
At the planning stage, QCC members are required to identify and select
projects/problems which need to be attended to. For each project/problem identified
for action, an implementation schedule needs to be prepared to ensure that the
project/problem is completed within the scheduled time period.
Step 2 :Do
The activities involved in the step `Do' are:
(a) Problem analysis
(b) Alternative solutions:
(c) Presentation to the Management:
(d) Consideration of suggestions and decision by the Management:
(e) Project implementation by the QCC members.
Step 3: Check
At this stage, the activity to be undertaken is evaluation. QCC members should carry
out an evaluation of the purposes solution being undertaken. This will indicate whether
the objective of the project has been attained or otherwise. The evolution can be carried
out through data collection and analysis during the trial run. Once evaluation has been
completed, the QCC members can decide whether to implement the proposed solution.
Step : Action
This form the final stage of the P.D.C.A approach. the activity involved is the
standardization of the corrective action. As a result of the evolution undertaken, QCC
members will be able to identify the improvements arising out of the corrective action
taken. If there are improvements, then QCC members can standardize the action
implemented and make it a part of the procedure or operations of the
department/office. A Briefing on the new procedure should be given to other members
of the department/office. QCC members could also check on the possibility of the
causes of the problem recurring or other side effects which may arise.