1

Gati, Saka, & Krausz, 2001

2002 Tavereira, Silva, Rodriguez, & Maia, 1998

2007

98 1 12010
15 80

2
2

2010

1992

1990
2010
20

3
3

Hartung2010Career Development Quarterly 2009
career assessment
de Acedo Lizarraga, de Acedo Baquedano, Oliver, &
Closas, 2009 van den Heuvel, Demerouti, Schreurs, Bakker, &
Schaufeli, 2009
Ting, 2009Shearer & Luzzo, 2009

Hirschi2009

Ability
Explorer, AEArmed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery,
ASVABCampbell Interest and Skill Survey, CISS
4
4

SampsonCarrLumsden Smisson2009

computer-assisted career guidance systems

GatiGadassi Shemesh2006

Discover Occupational
Information Network, O*NETSystem of Integrated Guidance and Information-Plus, SIGI-Plus

2011a2010
20112011b
2008b

5
5

6
6

7
7


aptitude test
Career counselingPersonnel psychology

general aptitude testmultiple aptitude test

specific aptitude test

profile

P.9

8
8

10
10


1.
?
()
()
()
()

2.

()6 ()10 ()14 ()18

3.

4.

11

11


()

() ()

()

(E)

(F)

(G)

(H)

5.

1-E
?
()2-C ()2-D ()4-B ()4-C

6.
A 10 C ?

7.

8.

12

12


1.
2.

1.
2.
3.

http://career.ntnu.edu.tw/

1. 2010 4 6 2010 10 2011 6

2.
13

13

3.
(1)2010 45 3163
1635 1528
(2)2011 5820 2949
2871
4.IRT 80
14 125
2010 167 82 85
IRT .53 .79

1. 2010
494 .06 .75
.18 .75
2.
(1) 114
.25 .32
(2) 2011 483
100
.28 .67
3. 2011 4946 2495
2451 .18 .41

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

6.
14

14

15

15

1.
2.
3.

4.

16

16

17
17


1.

______

2.
C

H ?
5H
- 2
55
5

3.

4.

0.5

7/12

12/7

5.

18

18

6.

BC

Food

CCA

ball city cake lake

Hi,___name is Tom.

he

Old is to new as good is to ___ .

bad easy one fast

she my

you

8.

7E6CO24 = 7E8CO24 7E6OC24 7E6CO24 7E6CO42

1.
2.

19

19

70

1.
2.

3.

1. 7560 100 100 2 1

2. 100 6300 100 600 1 300
1 60 1 2 100 600
3.10

20

20


1. 2010 9
2.
3.
25 3296 1638 868
770 1658 870 788
4.

1..73 .96 .90

2.25.3 6
218 .68 .92 .81 .85

1.
(1) 2 124
.19 .69 .40 .71
(2) 8 603
.21 .73 .25 .69
(3) 58
.16 .82 .27 .78
2.
(1) 99
8 581 598
.16 .63.10 .60
.36 .62.22 .59

21

21

(2) 100
10 664 .24 .75
.37 .71
(3) 100
4 260 .10
.71.19 .66
3..33 .69

4.

1.M 10 SD 3 1 19

2. 1 6
7 13 14 19

3.

22

22

1.

2.

23

23

24
24


1.

2.

3.

25

25

4.

5.

6.

26

26

7.

8.

1.
2.

27

27

1.
2.
(1)
(2)

1.
2. 20

1. 1000
2. 50

1. 2010
2.
3.

4.IRT Z
100 15
IRT
.30 .50 6
.70 1.2 6 .40
.55

1. t
IRT

28

28

2.
(1) 85%
IRT
(2) 4217

1.

2. IRT
Z

3.

29

29

1.
2.
3.

30

30

31
31


1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

1.
2.

1.
2.

32

32

1.
(1)

(2)
(3)
2. 10
(1)
(2)
(3)

1.
2.

1.
2.

1.
(1) 3000 2 50 100
(2) 1 600 50 1500
100 300 50 250
(3)
10 20

2.35

1. 2006 5
2.
33

33

3. 2 1 1 1
11 1151 5
500 237 263
4. T

1..83 .90.86 .92

2. 28 31
.81 .95.77 .90
3..35 .77.52 .85

1.
708

2.
SRMR

1.
2.
3.RSTSPR

34

34

1.
2.

1.
2.

3.

35

35

36
36


1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.

1.
2.

1.
2.

37

37

1.
2.

3.

1.
2.

1. 3170 2 30 2
50
2. 300 30 2100 60
50 350
3.
8
13

1. 2000 2001
2.
3. 14 1989
940 463 438 39
1049 501 513 35
4.T

1.KR-20.57 .89
.64 .90
38

38

2. 57 72
.38 .80.43 .88

1. 204
.01 .68
2. 89
124 204
.03 .61 .10 .74
3..13 .80

1.
2.
T M 50 SD 10
3.

39

39

1.
2.

1.
2.
3. 2001

40

40

41
41


1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

8.

1.
2.

1.
2.

42

42

1.

2.

3.

1.
2.

1. 4350 2
30 1
2. 400 30 1500 30 150
30 150 30 240
50
3.
10
25

1. 2003
2.
3. 12
1384 335 175
160 394 194 200
43

43

 313 176 137 342

150 192
4.
96
93 85 88
.56 .81.54 .85.52 .86.53 .85

1.
92 35 -.22 .51-.24
.52 35 -.16 .40
2. 655 -.03 .51
.09 .60

1.
2. M
100 SD 20
3.
4.

44

44

1.
2.

1.
2.

3.

45

45

46
46


1.
______
()-

()-

()-

()-

2.
B

1
8

3
9

5
10

11

3.

4.

5.
C

47

47

6.

D

7.

8.

1.
2.

48

48

1.
2.

3.

1.

2.

1. 25 100 2 1 5560

2. 25 3200 100 800 1 750

1 60 100 900
3.12

1. 1999 9
2.
3. 17 5604
1875 1009 866
1902 1008 894 1827
949 878
4.
KR-20 476 256 220
.58 .95
KR-20
49

49

 609
.11 .63

1.

2.

1.
2.

50

50

51
51


1.

______
-

2.

11
15

16

25 26

3.
A

4.

5.

52

52

6.
A B
C D
N

7.

8.

1.
2.

53

53

1.
2.

3.

1.
2.

1. 8260 2 100 100 1

2. 1 300 100 7000 100 600
100 600 1 60
3.10

1. 1994
2.
3. 22 3358
10 695 376 319
706 345 361 12 1957
1121 836
4.

1. 75 100
KR-20.63 .95.60 .94

54

54

2. 77 31 46
.40 .91 77 41 36 .57
.89

1.
(1) 48 .19 .58
(2) 49 49
.29 .56.12 .52
2. 53 42
52 62 209
-.01 .55-.12 .31
3. 76 99
.01 .47.07 .40

1.
2.

3.

55

55

1.
2.
3.
4. 1994

56

56

57
57
66


interest test
Spokane & Jacob, 1996
Osborn & Zunker, 2006

P.59

58
58

59

59

60
60


()

1.
2.
40 23

1.
2.
3.

http://career.ntnu.edu.tw/

2011 4 6
89 21 1790
909 881

61

61


1.Cronbach .93 .94
2..91 .93

1. Holland

2.
(1)
.22 .82 46.36%
(2)MTMM.66 .84
.08 .75.08
.64

1.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
2.
(1)
(2)
(3)

62

62

63

63

1.

2.
3.

64

64

65
65

1.
2.
20 168

1.
(1)
(2)
(3)
2.
(1)
(2)
(3)

1.
2. e
66

66


1.2B
2.

1.

2.

1. 1994 1996
2.
3.
3082 1286 1796
4.T
1986

Cronbach .77
.91.80 .88

1. 1995 1966 .08 .71

2.
(1) 116 .21 .61
(2) 1443
.37 .71
3. 3908
(1)

(2)

67

67


1.
2. 12

3.

68

68

1.
2. 68

3.

69

69

70
70

1.
2.
35 45 360

1.
2.
3.

1. 4650 1 50 50 50
50 DVD
71

71

2. 1000 50 1500 50 600

50 1000 50 150 DVD 400

1. 2004 2007
2.
3.
3649 1406 2213
4.T

1. Cronbach .82 .90

2. 20 .71 .96

1. Holland
I AI E
A RC R
2.
(1) 132 62
70 .71 .84
(2) 161 35 126
.43 .76

1. Holland

(1)
(2)
(3)
72

72

(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
2.

73

73

1.
2.

74

74

75
75


1. 15

2.
3.

1.
2.
30 152 *120 *16
*16

1.
2.
3.

76

76


1.
2.
2B

1. 3000 100 100 2

2. 100 1200 100 600 100 5200
1 600 100 300
3. 7

1989 10
64329

64329 Cronbach .82 .94

1. 46811 15 .00
.84

2. 120
8

1.
2.
3.
4.

77

77

1.
2.
3.
4.

78

78

79
79

1.A1A2A3A4
2.B1B2B3B4
3.C1C2C3C4
4.D1D2
5.E1E2E3
6.F1F2
7.G1
8.H1

1.
2.

1.
2.
30 132

1.
2.

80

80

1. 2250 1 50 50 2
2. 1 1000 1 350 50 250 50
300

10 10
8 16 25
69
T

13
17 30 .61
.88

19 13 32
.50 .72

1.
2.

3.

81

81

1.
2.

1.
2.
3.

82

82

83
83

 3 7 60 10

1.10 15
2.
60 90 3 7 60
10

1.
2.

3.

84

84


1. 3850 2 1 50 100
2. 350 350 50 2500
100 300

1. 2001
2.
3. 32 16 16

4.

82
39 43
1..67 .86
2. 7
54.88% 85.37%

1.

2. 90
Holland 60
.19 .78
3. 84
-.41 .46

85

85


1.
2.

3.

(1)
Holland
(2)
(3)

1.
2.

1.10 15
2.
3.

4. Holland

86

86

87
87

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

1.
2.

1.
2.
25 96

1.
2.
3.

1. 1900 2 50
2. 1 450 50 1000
88

88

96
16 615 313 302

Cronbach .65 .81.61 .79

1.
39.9% 40.8% 40.2%
2.MTMM

102 489 225

264

1.
2.

3.
4.

89

89

1.
2.

1.
2.
3.
4.

90

90

91
91


V Verification Scale

1.
2.
35 240

1.
2.
3.

1.
2.

1. 3520 2 100 100

2. 1 300 100 2600 100 300
1 20
3.
7
92

92


1. 1997
2.
3. 34
5271 2699 2572
357 192 165 601 309
292 673 343 330
732 367 365 2908
1488 1420
4.

1. 129 74 55
183 93 90 Cronbach
.27 .88.32 .90
2. 80 42 38
68 26 42
.42 .89.01 .64

1. 112 62
50 129 43 86
.01 .67.08 .87
2. Roe Klos
129 74 55 183
93 90
.43 .71 .59 .79
.41 .63
.20 .64

93

93


1.
2.

1.

2.
3.
4.

94

94

95
95

SAL
EBA'M
PS'

4 3 2 1

1.
2.
30 180

1.
2.
3.

100 5000 5 1600 100 800

1. 1996 9 10
2.
3. 27
2152 1085 1067
96

96

4.

1. 454 236 218

.79 .93
2. 454 236 218
.68 .87

.22 .69

1.
2.

97

97

1.
2.

98

98

99
99


personality test

P.101

100
100

101

101

102
102

 15 14 4

1.
2.
40 150

1.
2.
3.

100 6000 100 900

4 1520

103

103


1. 2002 2003
2.
3. 3261 1673
1588
4.
647 306 341
.71 .93
647
306 341 .62 .81

1.
2.
3. 1 5
scalefactortype
1.G1
2 3 4 5

2.

3. A
BCDE
F

104

104

1.
2.L 7 8

3.

105

105

106
106

 6 7

1.
2.
15 20 76

1.
2.
3.

1.
2. T

107

107

1. 8000 100 2 1
2. 28 1650 2400

1. 2000
2.
3. 34 1411
747 664 445 239 206
424 217 207 542 291 251
4. T

1. Cronbach .72 .90

2. 36 36 72
.45 .88

1.
(1) 57 -.25 .73 44
-.11 .71
(2) 154 7 14
.38
2.
1764 1784

1988

108

108


1.
INCSCFGRD
2.
3.
(1)TOT
(2)CON
4.PHYMOR
PERFAMSOC
ACA
5.IDNSATBHV

109

109

1.
2.

3.

110

110

111
111

 10 2

1.
2.

1.
2.
30 150

1.
112

112

2.
3.

1.
2.

1. 3080 2 50 100
2
2. 450 50 1500 100 500
-1 45 -2
45 100 600
3. 10
20

1. 1999
2.
3.
(1) 539 730 844
2113 1071 1039 3
(2) 134
70 64
4.
(1) T

(2)

113

113


1. Cronbach 844 .66 .77
730 .66 .79 539 .60
.80
2. 39 .68 .87
33 .59 .89 22 .55 .91

1. 37
.43 .66 35 .43 .78
2.
56.1%

1.
2. 10 PASAED

3.

4.
(1)CON
(2)DEN

1.
2.

114

114

1.
2.
3.

115

115

aptitudeinterest

1994

116
116

117
117

2004

2011a 100 9 13 http://

career.ntnu.edu.tw/junior/TestAptitude/TA_Introduction.aspx
2011b 100 9 13 http://
career.ntnu.edu.tw/junior/TestInterest/TI_Introduction.aspx
2010
0980063148
2007
3429-50
2011C. Branton Sheare

1999Douglas N. Jackson

2007
2000

2001
2000

2011

2010 100 9 23
http://www.utest.com.tw/webtest/test_intro.php
1997
2010 99
2008a

118
118

2008b 100 9 23
http://php.ejob.gov.tw/interest/
2007

1999

1994

2003
1997
1994
2006

2002

de Acedo Lizarraga, M. L. S., de Acedo Baquedano, M. T. S., Oliver, M. S., &

Closas, A.(2009). Development and validation of a decision-making question
naire. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 37, 357-373.
Gati, I., Gadassi, R., & Shemesh, N.(2006). The predictive validity of a computerassisted career decision-making system: A six-year follow-up. Journal of Voca
tional Behavior, 68, 205-219.
Gati, I., Saka, N., & Krausz, M. (2001). Should I use a computer-assisted career
guidance system? It depends on where your career decision-making difficulties
lie. British Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 29, 301-321.
Hartung, P. J. (2010). Practice and Research in Career Counseling and Development
--2009. The Career Development Quarterly, 59, 98-142.
Hirschi, A. (2009). Development and criterion validity of differentiated and elevated
vocational interests in adolescence. Journal of Career Assessment, 17, 384-401.
Osborn, D. S., & Zunker, V. G. (2006). Using assessment for career development.
(7th ed.). US: Thomson Brooks.

119
119

Sampson, J.P., Carr, D.L., Lumsden, J.A., Smission, C. (2009). Computer-assisted

career assessment: State of the art. P.43-60 in A Counselors Guide to Career
Assessment Instrument, 5th edition, Edited by E. A. Whitfield, R.D. Feller and C.
Wood. US: The National Career Development Association.
Shearer, C. B., & Luzzo, D. A. (2009). Exploring the application of multiple intelligences theory to career counseling. The Career Development Quarterly, 58, 3-13.
Spokane, A. R., &Jacob, E. J. (1996). Career and vocational assessment 1993-1994:
Abiennial review. Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 1-32.
Tavereira, M. D. C., Silva, M. C., Rodriguez, M. L., & Maia, J. (1998). Individual char
acteristics and career exploration in adolescents. British Journal of Counseling
and Guidance, 26, 89-104.
Ting, S. R. (2009). A preliminary study on the effectiveness of the Chinese Career
Key online. The Career Development Quarterly, 58, 77-81.
Van den Heuvel, M., Demerouti, E., Schreurs, B. H. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W.
B. (2009). Does meaning-making help during organizational change? Develop
ment and validation of a new scale. Career Development International, 14, 508553.

2
120