Student Name:
Sutthisrisaarng Pholpark
__________________________________________
Student ID:
17682974
__________________________________________
Unit Name:
Lecturers Name:
Paul W.
__________________________________________
Due Date:
14/11/2014
__________________________________________
Date Submitted:
12/11/2014
__________________________________________
DECLARATION
I have read and understood Curtins policy on plagiarism, and, except where indicated, this
assignment is my own work and has not been submitted for assessment in another unit or
course. I have given appropriate references where ideas have been taken from the published or
unpublished work of others, and clearly acknowledge where blocks of text have been taken from
other sources.
I have retained a copy of the assignment for my own records.
Sutthisrisaarng Pholpark
________________________________________
[Signature of student]
Percentage:
Lecturers Comments:
Lecturers Name:
Date Returned:
1 vd.ers
dtm.ers
mag.ers
pot.ers
tho.ers
ura.ers
sh5010.ers
1. Maps display
This section is aimed to display the given data in Oasis montaj. All grids are displayed in color shaded
option with 45 degrees inclination/45 degrees declination. In addition, all grids from radiometric
survey is combined and displayed in ternary image.
First vertical derivative grid(nT/m)
Digital terrain model grid(m)
Display the rate of change of magnetics respect to
Display bare ground elevation without effects of
z-axis. Can be used for detecting faults or rocks in
buildings or environments.
subsurface.
Magnetics grid(nT)
Step 2
Step 3
First vertical derivative map can be used to locating faults as shown below. According to the given
geological maps the first estimated fault line is about the approximation fault and the second estimate
fault line is about the inferred fault.
Step 2
Magnetics map can be used to locating rock type in subsurface. Due to different rock types
have different magnetizations, when we do a magnetic survey over a particular area, magnetic
response of each rock type from the survey will reflect rocks material component. The pictures
below show relationships between magnetic response and rock types.
Rock 1: Its magnetics response is related to Czl in geological map which are laterite and associated sand.
Rock 2: Its magnetics response is related to Czr in geological map which is Silcrete.
What correlations do you observe between the different datasets and with the published geology?
First vertical derivative of magnetics published geology: The area of discontinuity of the first vertical
derivative is possible to have underlying faults. (also see 2.1)
Magnetics published geology: Magnetics response from rocks is related to rock types. In formation
phase of rocks, they acquire magnetization during process of formation e.g. cooling period, deposit
period. This make each rock type has a different magnetization which directly concerned with magnetic
response. So we may discriminate rock type from magnetics map. (also see 2.2)
Radiometrics ternary image published geology: Most of the gamma-ray responses relate to the
uppermost subsurface materials. We can use U/Th ratio to discriminate rock types. Hence, we can use
radiometrics ternary images to roughly create geological map. The example is shown below.
1. Black area: Low detection of gamma-ray. This area may compose of sediments, saturated soil or water
bodies because gamma-ray is unable to penetrate through these materials
2. Red dominant area (potassium rich): Related to felsic volcanic and igneous rocks.
3. Green-blue dominant area (uranium-thorium rich): Related to ferruginous lags and weathered
materials.
4. White area (P/U/Th rich): Related to felsic volcanic and igneous rocks
Reference:
Carter, J. D., and Lipple, S. L., 1982, Geology of the Moora 1:250000 sheet: Geological Survey of Western
Australia, Department of Mines and Energy.
1.4 Select appropriate colour mode and colour table for your data. Colour table will be used in stretching
process e.g. look up colour table to transform input image.
This function allow users to load filter algorithm for imaging processing. The example below is DEM
display after use aspect.ker filter. This filter help to enhance slope of DEM. Others filter e.g. upward
continuation, low pass filter can be selected depending on users objective.
Transform limit can be used to adjust image contrast. There are several parameters can be adjusted.
Users can adjust transform limit to control colour range so that only desired colours is enhanced. Users can
select transform method e.g. linear stretch, histogram equalize to enhance desired features. The transform
will map image values to colour table. For example, if an image has a range between 206 - 250, this number
will be mapping to value 0 - 255 for pseudo colour table so that new colours from colour table are assigned to
an image. The pictures below show results from different transform setting.
If we change colour table in #2 to rainbow, lookup colour table in transform window will be changed to
rainbow as shown below.
Users can use Realtime Sunshaded function to enhance features of an image. Users can adjust this
function in pseudo layer alone or add another layer for sun shaded. The later method significantly enhance
elevation features in the digital terrain model as shown below.
Then contour wizard will show up. There are several steps as shown below to complete creating your
contour.
3. Annotation
Before adding any annotations, you need to set up your page.
By using annotation tools, Users can display your image professionally. Users can use page set up
function to adjust a size of your map. You can also add important map featues e.g. map detail box, scale bar,
colour legend bar, direction annotation and grid on your map.
After you finish adding important annotations, you will have a map as shown below.
4. Display image in 3D
Magnetics
Sun-illumination, 3D
2. Create grids using four different methods minimum curvature, kriging, spline gridding and tins.
Note that the grid cell size should be around 1/4 to 1/3 of the line space in order to increase the
resolution of the grid. So that the gird cell size 30 is used in this experiment. All gridding methods use Z
axis so that we can see the elevation trend from SRTM data.
Minimum curvature
Kriging
Spline Gridding
TIN Gridding
3. Compare the grids and also compare against posted elevation values from the database.
In order to compare the grids from different gridding methods, the area of comparing need to
be specified to get a clear result. The area that appropriate for grid comparisons in this SRTM data is
the contact between Kings Park and Swan River because we can observe the data
overshoot/undershoot from elevation transitions of that area. The picture below shows satellite map
of the mentioned area which has been taken from Google map. We use Window a Grid to capture
only the area that we want.
The pictures below show the results from different gridding methods.
Grid display
Comment: From the displays we can clearly see that the colors of each gridding method assigned in sea-level
are different.
You can use posting function in map tools to post the real values of the data taken from database on your grid
in order to compare between gird values and the real values from each different gridding method.
Minimum curvature
By comparing posting values and grid values
(lookup in clolor legend bar), some assigned colors
e.g. as in the circles do not match the posting
values, some of them have higher values and some
have higher values. In addition, there are
discontinuities in color display, even though the
real values have quite smooth variations. In
summarize, for this dataset, minimum curvature
does not adapt its color variation to the real value
well.
Kriging
Most of the colors showing in Krigging method
match the posting value very well. In addition its
color variation is coherence with the real data.
Spline
Spline gridding method matchs the variations of
data between parallel lines very well (N-S),
however, it does not take variation of data in
orthogonal lines (E-W) into account. So that the
spline method is unable fully represent the data in
2 line directions.
TIN
TIN method is good for weighing data when there
are several values colleted at the same location. In
TIN gridding caluation, it use Tin mesh and Tin
nodes in order to weight data. However, this data
is collected only single value at a particular
location with equally spaced lines. So when
weighting data, all of the points are equally
weighted by only taking adjacent values in
calculated. So that we can observe some strong
discontinuities of colors between data points e.g.
as shown shown in the circles.
Judging from comparing posting values to the grid data and the profiles comparing, krigging shows the best
performance in color variation according to the real data, less overshooting and rapidly converge to 1. Hence
krigging is the best gridding method.
5. See gridding notes that are provided in the workshop folder.
6. Add notes on how each gridding method works. See Oasis Montaj help files and tutorials. Aim to write
half to a page on each method.
6.1 Spline or Bi-directional Gridding
- Suitable for the data collected along lines that are roughly parallel, as in the following pictures.
The equation shows that the greater distance between data points, the higher variation between the points.
There are 2 models in krigging calculation which are ordinary krigging and universal krigging used to estimate
the data values at the nodes of the grid. The main different between the introduced models is that a method
to define the variance of the data, however, both models based on a variogram.
The process of krigging is complicate, the size of the data set may limit the use of krigging since it is very time
consuming in a large dataset calculation.
In addition, KRIGRID in Oasis motaj is able to produce an error grid which is a by-product of kriging statistics.
This grid shows the degree of confidence at each grid node.
4. Set up synthetic survey (Utility>synthetic lines) with 101 north south lines, ref pt x=500 000, y = 6 000
000, line length = 20000 m, pt spacing = 20 m, survey width 20000 m, line spacing = 200 m, azimuth = 0
degrees, select create survey
6. Create tabular model: model>body operations>create body>tabular, susceptibility = 0.1 SI units, strike
length = 10000 m
7. Go back to open map (step 5) and click on map to position centre of model on centre of grid of lines.
8. To see body parameters body properties > see or change thickness and extent record these for later
use.
10. To see magnetic grid: view>map>grid image (Note that you need to activate your model before viewing
the grid)
11. To see individual cross sections: view > X-section, select line eg 51 (central line)
12. To export model grid: file.export>ermapper ers format, use 8 byte real
13. In oasis montaj create new project and view model grid using display grid etc
14. Run analytic signal grid filter to create analytic signal grid and then create central north south profile and
east west profile using gridprof.gx
Run Analytic Signal
Run Gridprof.gx
15. Look at grid profiles in database (show profile etc) to see how well they recover model parameters
location and depth to top etc.
Location accuracy
Direction
N-S
E-W
Inflection point of AS
6005840.2
5995563.5
497883.4
502343.1
%error
8.402
5.635
19.666
21.931
Comment on location accuracy: The N-S analytic signal profile has higher accuracy in locating the targets
edge that the E-W profile. However, overall of analytic signal performances in locating the targets edge
are within 20% error.
Depth and width accuracy
EW profile
nT/m
AS maximum point
4.020358
1/2 AS maximum point
2.010179
1/2 AS maximum point LEFT 1.919922
1/2 AS maximum point RIG 1.892624
Width
Half-Width
Depth
NS profile
AS maximum point
1/2 AS maximum point
1/2 AS maximum point LEFT
1/2 AS maximum point RIGHT
Width
Half-Width
Depth
x
500016.3
496913.9
503118.7
6204.79
3102.395
3102.395
m
m
m
nT/m
y
5.211882 500016.3366
2.605941
2.605941 6006809.674
2.605941 5995563.474
11246.19947
5623.099734
5623.099734
m
m
m
Note: The half-maximum points (on the left and the right) of N-S profile come from extrapolation between data
points in order to obtain the exact y values according to the maximum of analytic signal (2.605341).
Profile
N-S Depth
N-S Width
E-W Depth
E-W Width
Calculated
Model
%error
5623.099734
2000
36.231
11246.19947
10000 12.46199
6204.79
2000 42.0479
3102.395
3000 1.02395
Comment on depth (to the top) and target width accuracy: Analytic signal can recover the width of the
target very well with less than 15% errors. However, when using Half-height Half-width (analytic signal) method
to compute the targets depth below the ground, the errors are as high as 36% in N-S profile and 42% in E-W
profile.
After complete all the steps, Euler solutions are saved in the database. You can use solutions plot to see
where are the solutions on your magnetic map.
Comment: From the solution plot, we can see that the location of the solution is lying in the targets
body. The error of the computed located Euler solution to locate the target depth is 40%. The error is
close to computed depth from analytic signal E-W profile. Located Euler is unable to map the targets
edge. If the extension of the target is required, then standard Euler should be used instead.
17. Record all steps and results in your electronic lab books. How well have Analytic Signal and Euler
Deconvolution worked in recovering model parameters?
In targets depth recovery, depth calculations from analytic signal show better accuracy than the depth
computed from located Euler. Even though these technic yield error more than 30% in the depth from the
surface to the target, the range of the depths is still lying within the targets body.The accuracies of both
technics are shown in the topic 16 for analytic signal and the topic 17 for located Euler.
After imported Moora.csv into the created database, the coordinate of the file need to be set before processing in
further steps.
2.
Produce maps showing station locations and grid Bouguer Anomaly and height above Australian Height
datum ( AHD )
After step 3, the station locations are automatically in the created map. Station spacing can be obtained
from the distance between the centers of adjacent stations. Station spacing = 50 m and the appropriate
grid cell size (for gridding) is of the station spacing = 50 m.
Base map is created with scale 1:40000 m. The station locations plot is showed below.
The picture below shows colour-shadded grid with 45 incl/45 decl in the base map scale 1:40000 m with contour and
colour legend bar.
Figure 2 Bouguer anomaly colour-shadded grid with 45 incl/45 decl in the base map scale 1:40000 m with contour and colour legend bar
Note: The contours are significantly dense in the middle of the grid which indicates the high bouguer anomaly
gradient in the middle area. This attributes to the underlying fault (Darling fault).
2.3 Australian Height datum ( AHD )
AHD displays the topography of Moora area. In addition, it can be used in a terrain correction process in
order to remove terrain effects in gravity data which mask the target (not included in this lab).
The picture below shows colour-shadded grid with 45 incl/45 decl in the base map scale 1:40000 m with
contour and colour legend bar. The process steps are similar to bouguer anomaly grid display in topic 2.3. The
unit displays here is in metre.
Figure 3 Australian Height datum (AHD ) colour-shadded grid with 45 incl/45 decl in the base map scale 1:40000 m with contour and colour
legend bar
3.
You will see that the data is very dominated by an east west gradient due to the presence of the fault.
Can you locate the position of the Darling Fault ?
There are 2 methods to locate the fault which are (1) by using gridprof to create bouguer anomaly profile
across the fault and then use horizontal gradient (database filter) to locate the inflection point of the bouguer
anomaly profile, the center of the fault is at the inflection point, (2) by using horizontal gradient filter for
bouguer anomaly grid, the center of the fault is at maximum point of horizontal gradient.
We use an inflection point of the bouguer anomaly
and the maximum point of HGRAD to locate the fault
because an abruptly change of density contrast and
mass caused an abruptly in gravity data. Hence the
maximum rate of variation is the fault location.
Then draw a line across bouguer anomaly grid and save to the new database.
3.1.2 Go to the created database. Use database filter to calculate horizontal gradient of the selected
profile. The peak of HGRAD represents where the bouguer anomaly has the maximum slope
which indicates center of the fault.
3.1.3 Use gridprof.gx to draw 2 more line paths (3 lines altogether). Then you can use map tools to
draw (1) line path, (2) bouguer anomaly profile, (3) HGRAD profile. We can locate the central of
the fault location by use maxima point of HGRAD as show in the picture below (figure 4). As
seen in figure 4, the estimate location of the faults is mismatch with the fault location in the
geology map.
The map below shows the result from HGRAD filter. The unit of the map is mGal/m. The high values are
located around the central of the map which attributes to the effect of the fault.
3.2.2 Create a new database and use gridprof to draw line paths across HGRAD grid. Plot the
maximum points of (1) line path, (2) bouguer anomaly profile, (3) HGRAD profile on the map.
The maximum point of each HGRAD profile is the central of the fault.
From the modeling, the model profile does not well match with the anomaly profile. However, we can observe that
the effect of the fault (the purple body) yields the profile similar to the fault anomaly e.g. shape and gradient. In
addition, the created fault model is similar to the geological fault model in figure 8. In summarize, we can confirm
that the effect of east-west gradient is due to the present of the fault in that area and the fault dip down direction is
as in figure 7.
4.
What we are interested in is the bedrock topography under the town of Moora.
How do we minimize the effect of the Darling Fault and look in detail at bedrock topography? Use regional /
residual separation in Oasis Montaj.
The effect of the fault in bouguer anomaly gravity masks the effect of underlying bedrock, hence, in order to
observe bedrock topography in the data, the regional effect caused by the bedrock need to be removed. In
Oasis montaj, we can use trend filter to remove the effect of regional gravity. The output of the trend filter is
residual.
Note: Bouguer anomaly = regional + residual, what we want to observe is residual.
Figure 9 (left) Bouguer anomaly and (right) Residual anomaly after trend filter
Figure 10 Residual grid with 45 incl/45 decl in the base map scale 1:40000 m with contour and colour legend bar
Note: We can use grid math to compute regional grid, to see how it affects the bouguer anomaly. From the regional
grid, we can clearly see that the effect of the fault caused a gravity gradient from the east towards the west
direction.
5.
Use ModelVision to model bedrock topography using grid profiles from Oasis Montaj (use gridprof.gx ).
Note: The instruction of using gridprof is shown in the topic 3.1
The background density of the area is 2.67, for the model is 2.27.
*** Note: The model in line 3 is very distinctive from others. This may attributes to the location of the profile is far
from the survey station, hence its value came from the extrapolation in minimum curvature process instead of
geological influence. So that the model from line 3 should not take in to account of the interpretation. ***
Since line3 is removed, it is reselected as show in the grid below. The new model is more geological possible the
previous model.
6.
The fault dipped down in the west (as in the picture below) and its vertical throw is approximately 3.1 km.
3.
Produce map showing flight lines. What are line direction and spacing? Projection details are WGS84
and UTM zone 35S.
Line spacing is 1000 m. Hence the appropriate grid cell size is of line spacing = 250 m
4.
Grid the Bouguer gravity (Gd), Gravity vertical gradient (Gdd) and DEM data and produce maps with
base maps for all 3 grids. The channels you will need are: easting, northing, DEM,
gD_FOURIER_2p67_1000 , GDD_FOURIER_2p67_1000
Figure 3 (left) Bouguer gravity (Gd) and (right) Gravity vertical derivative (Gdd) both display with color-shaded grid display 45incl/45decli
5.
How do the gravity grids relate to known geology and also to aeromagnetic data?
The steps of georeferencing method are shown in the extra part of this lab. After the geological map is
warped by correct coordinates, it can be used to overly by any survey data which has the same
georeferencing. The results are shown below.
6.
Run Euler deconvolution on the gravity grids to determine source positions and depths.
Use Structural index of 0.5 and 5 % tolerance. This survey was flown 80 metres above ground level.
In order to run Euler deconvolution, the
derivative grids of gravity need to be computed.
As shown on the left, we can see that dz of
gravity is very similar to measured data from
gravity gradiometry except the noisy lines. So
we may use gravity gradiometry data instead of
dz.
SI is directly related to field fall-off rate to the target. Different target shapes need to be
assigned appropriate SI to obtain accurate Euler solutions. For gravity data, SI = 0 is appropriate for Sill
/ Dyke / Ribbon / Step and SI = 1 is appropriate for Cylinder / Pipe.
After performed standard Euler deconvolution with the data set, it gives too many solutions,
hence located Euler is performed instead.
Located Euler deconvolution solutions with SI = 0.5 and SI = 1 are plotted with size and color
proportional to depth as shown below.
With SI = 0.5, it yields 89 solutions whereas SI = 1 yields 92 solutions. The solutions are screened by mask
channel which allow showing only solutions with STD less than 5%. Solution locations computed from SI = 0.5
and 1 are almost identical, however, source depths at the same locations are different. Overall, solutions from
SI = 0.5 tend to give shallower source depth than SI = 1.
The solutions with depth in the same range (as plot in the same color) attribute to the same source.
The examples are shown below. We can see that solutions with similar depths positioned close to each other
a in the red circles.
7.
What are the noise levels in the Gd and Gdd data channels ?
Run fourth difference database convolution filter to calculate two new channels in the database
Filter coefficients are 1, -4, 6, -4, 1
Note: We can use 5 points convolution to obtain noise behavior. From the observation, pattern of noise in Gd
and GDD in the same line are similar except they are in different levels.
Extra: How to mapping coordinate in to your geological map e.g. JPEG file. (Georeferencing)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
After step 5, you should have .wrp file. Then you have to attach your .wrp file to your map.
Finally, coordinate of your geological map is created. Now it is ready to be used in your interpretation
e.g. overlay it in magnetics map!!!
References:
in the workshop 7 and 8 folder on Blackboard
Cowan and Cooper, 2009
Muundjua et al, 2007
Schedule 2 Data processing and deliverables
Technical notes on Falcon preliminary processing