Sally Dickie
EDP 3310
10/08/08
Today, when one has decided to start the journey of becoming a teaching professional, the
term Inclusion is one that you are informed of early on and one that is likely to greatly affect your
teaching career. For myself, going into the field of Special Education, the term or idea Inclusion,
is one that is often discussed through out my course work. For this assignment, I researched the
Inclusion/Mainstreaming can be defined as including students with special needs into the general
For countless years and decades, students with disabilities were often placed in separate
classrooms just for students with special needs. Recently, the idea of including students with
special needs into the main general education classroom, has taken off and is starting to become
practiced all over the world. Due to the fact that this is a generally new idea and practice, there is
a lot to be learned and studied to determine whether or not the practice of Inclusion is effective
and for whom it is effective. The research I found gave me an insight of this complex process and
The first study I will discuss is titled “Involvement or Isolation? The Social Networks of
Children with Autism in Regular Classrooms.” By Brandt Chamberlain. The focus of this study is
on children with autism and how mainstreaming in general education classrooms affects them
socially. The participants studied were 398 children in regular classrooms 2nd grade through 5th
grade, including 17 children with high functioning Autism or Asperger’s Syndrome. For this
study, 17 children with Autism were placed in the general education classroom and all of the
children studied, both general education and special education, reported outcomes on Friendship
quality, loneliness, peer acceptance, and classroom social networks. To measure these outcomes,
this study used the “Social Network Clustering Method” developed by Cairns and Cairns, 1994.
By observing classrooms with the participants previously mentioned above, both general
education students and students with autism, and collecting the data by questioning the students
themselves on key issues involved in mainstreaming, this method allows us to determine how
children with autism perceive the Inclusion environment and how other children perceive the
students with Autism. Often in studies of inclusion, the focus is on the educational impact on
students, and not the social impact on students. I chose this study because it focuses on the social
impact on students with autism in the general education classroom. It addresses the key question:
The results of this study indicate that the general education students tended to socially
interact with children in their same gender. While children with Autism, tended to socially
interact with females. One idea behind this is that, at this age level, boys tend to be more
competitive and likely to tease, while girls are more socially mature and welcoming. Another
result of this study indicated that children with ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) tended to be
less centrally involved in the social structure of the classroom. However, over all, only six of the
398 students involved were reported to be isolated in the classroom. Furthermore, compared to
their peers without Autism, children with ASD reported doing fewer things with and spending
less time with their friends in the classroom. In conclusion, it appears in this study, that the
Inclusion of children with ASD, had a less than positive effect on the children with ASD on a
social basis. While it was not considered devastating, the data indicates that children with ASD
were more socially separated and developed fewer and weaker relationships than their peers
without ASD.
The Second study I examined is titled “Visual Impairment and Multiple Disablities: The
evaluation of a ten-week programme in Cyprus to integrate children with multiple disabilities and
visual impairments into a mainstream primary school.” By Your Mom. The focus of this study is
how in Cyprus there are very few opportunities for children with disabilities to learn along
mainstream children. I chose this study because it gives a different cultural perspective of
mainstreaming children with visual and/or multiple disabilities in the general education
classroom.
school and specialist school to determine whether relationships can be developed between
children with special needs and mainstreamed children by the co-education of both groups. The
participants of this study consisted of three primary school children with multiple disabilities and
visual impairment from a specialist school and 15 children with no disabilities attending a
neighboring mainstream primary school. The study measured whether or not the interaction
between the individual students with visual impairments and those students without visual
impairments was actually beneficial for the students with visual impairments. To evaluate this
program, a multi-method approach was used. Six main research methods were used. These were:
emotional evaluation of the children; observation of the children in the classroom setting; one to
one interviews with professionals; focus group discussions with parents; telephone discussions
The general findings were that in the beginning of the program, the three children with
visual impairments found it to be difficult to work in a group in the mainstream classroom, they
gave up very easily, and often could not finish the task. The findings state that at the end of the
program, the children felt more comfortable working in groups, could accomplish most of the
tasks, and felt more comfortable working alongside students in the mainstream school. The most
important information obtained from this study, was that for the first time students from the
private specialist school, stated that they desired to attend a different school where they could
In conclusion, contrary to the previous study, where children with Autism found the
social interaction and situation of the “inclusion” classroom to be a less than positive
environment, students with visual impairments in the “inclusion” classroom in Cyprus, found it to
of a residential special school for children with emotional and behavioral difficulties.” By Garry
Hornby and Chrystal Witte. The focus of this study was on adult graduates of a residential special
school in New Zealand who had also attended mainstream schools and the comparison of the two.
The participants of this study were 21 adult students who were located 10 to 14 years after they
had left the residential school. The reason I chose this article is because it gives a personal view
of how the students themselves viewed being in both a special program school and a mainstream
classroom.
The method used for this study was interview based questions. These four open-ended
questions were: What were some of the difficulties you had at school?', 'What were some of your
positive experiences at school?', 'What were the least and most helpful aspects of your schooling?'
and 'How could your school life have been improved?' Once the interview’s had taken place, the
results were grouped based on 5 key emerging themes: difficulties experienced at school; positive
experiences at school; helpful aspects of schooling; unhelpful aspects of schooling; and suggested
The results of this study conclude that all 21 students participating in this study made
negative comments about their experience in the mainstream classroom, where as 18 out of 21 of
the students had positive things to say about their time at the residential school. One student
quoted “My most valuable time was at Melton. It was rewarding because of the specific training
and it was the longest time I ever stayed at school. I would have preferred to have been there as
Similarly to the previous two studies, the students stated in this study that they had a less
than positive experience in the mainstream classroom. However, in this study, the participants
stated how both experiences, in the residential program and the mainstream program affected
them, unlike in the previous two studies, where only the effects of the mainstream program were
discussed.
The next study I examined is titled “Pilot for Alaska Students with Deaf-Blindness:
Inclusion in Regular Classrooms.” By DiAnn Brown and Fran Mauiri. The focus of this study is
on the inclusion of students with Deaf-Blindness into the general education classroom in an urban
setting and a rural setting in Alaska. Four students with hearing and/or visual impairments were
used in this study. Three were deaf/blind and the fourth had visual impairments.
The method used to collect data were surveys given the professionals involved in the
general education classroom to determine how much time the students with special needs were
spending in the general education classroom and what types of objectives were taught in each
setting. A second method was used to collect data from both the rural and urban school known as
the “Student Activity Analysis”, which measured key outcomes of activities in the classroom such
as if the activities were: age appropriate, instruction similar as indicated on the IEP, students with
and without disabilities interacting and learning together…” to name a few. Two video
The results of this study led three out of the four students participating to be placed into
the general education classroom. This study concludes that all of the students participating in this
study, both special education and general education, had a positive experience with this pilot
program. In the end, 3 out of 4 students as a result were placed permanently in a general
education classroom. Unlike the previous three studies I’ve examined, in this study, the over-all
outcome is that inclusion for students with deaf-blindness in Alaska was a positive experience
The final study that I examined is titled “Mainstreaming Programs: Design Features and
Effects.” By Margaret Wang (PhD) and Edward Baker (B.SS). This is a meta-analysis of 11
empirical studies, of the effects of mainstreaming on special education students. I chose this
The method of this study chosen was “Meta-Analysis”, as I previously stated. The
analysis was designed to address the following specific questions: What is the empirical evidence
on the academic and social outcomes for mainstreamed disabled students? Are there certain
One of the variables studied were whether or not there was sufficient and documented
evidence that mainstreaming programs effectively improve the academic performance of disabled
students. The procedure used to collect the desired data was a two-step analysis used in the
quantitative synthesis of findings from the mainstreaming studies that comprised the final sample
The results of the studies conclude that across the studies, an overall positive effect of
mainstreaming was found. Contrary to previous empirical studies conducted in the past, and even
empirical studies conducted over the past decade indicate consistently positive effects of
mainstreaming on disabled students. Furthermore, the data from the reviews indicates that
effectiveness of mainstreaming tends to be more effective for students based on their disability
level. In conclusion to the studies I examined, this final study, concluded that mainstreaming was
notably effective for disabled students, similarly to the study conducted in Alaska, but contrarily
to the first three studies. This study however, focused on a number of empirical studies and was a
In conclusion to the studies I examined, three out of five of the studies indicated an
overall less than positive experience for students in the mainstream/ inclusion classrooms. It is
notable to mention that the first three studies were focused on the opinions and views of the
special education and general education students involved in the inclusion practice and the last
two studies were more focused on the educational outcomes of the special education students
involved. Based on these 5 studies examined, it appears that the overall experience studied for the
students involved was less than positive, while the educational outcomes studied appeared to be
and important topics of our time. It is hard to believe that just within the past 100 years, children
with disabilities were often institutionalized at a young age and never really seen from society
again. In regards to that, we as a society have come a long way. For years, students with
disabilities have been segregated in the school into their own classrooms.
Recently, the idea of including children with special needs in the general education
classroom has taken off around the United States and around the world. With any new process in
education, research must be done to determine whether or not this new idea and trend is one that
benefits all the students involved. While the idea of inclusion may seem as a big advancement in
the educational process in the United States, it is important to determine if the research backs it
up. As I have learned in the course of Educational Psychology, it is only “Common Sense” is the
When studying inclusion it is important to determine if the students really are benefiting
educationally and socially from being included in the general education classroom. The first three
studies I examined indicated that socially, the students had a less than positive experience being
mainstreamed in the general education classroom. For future reference when I am a teacher, it
will be important for me to find ways to include my students with special needs in all activities in
the classroom. If educationally it appears that being included in the general education classroom
is beneficial for students with special needs, the area I would need to work on as a professional
would be to ensure there is a appropriate balance and social interaction between students with
The results that I found were not what I expected to see. As a student in the field of
Special Education, the idea of inclusion appears to be the biggest thing in education and I
assumed it was all around beneficial for students. It is safe to say that more research needs to be
done on this new practice and time will tell if all the students involved really benefit from this
process. As a future Special Education professional, it will be crucial I understand this process