to
Dubois
et.
al
(2000),
Dinitrosalicyclic
(DNS)
3-amino-5-
nitrosalicyclic acid
+ Gluconic acid
The above reaction scheme shows that one mole of sugar will react with
one mole of 3, 5-dinitrosalicylic acid and reduced to 3-amino-5nitrosalicyclic acid
On
the
other
hand,
the
application
of
spectrophotometric
sugar concentration of two samples which are apple juice and strawberry
jam will be determined by using colourimetric (spectrophotometric)
method
MATERIALS
1. Double-beam spectrophotometer
10. Spatulas
2. Analytical balance
7. Wash bottle
3. Plastic/Glass cuvettes
8. Stop-watch
4. Beakers
9. Ice water
5. Vortex mixer
6. Pipettes
7. Volumetric flasks
8. Test-tubes and racks
tetrahydrate
9. Water-bath (boiling)
Sodium
potassium
tartrate
METHODS
A. Preparation of DNS reagent
1. Solution A was prepared first by dissolving 10 g of DNS in 200 mL 2
M NaOH with warming and vigorous stirring
2. Solution B was then prepared by dissolving 300 g sodium potassium
tartrate tetrahydrate in 500 mL distilled water
3. Both solution A and B was then mixed together before make up to 1
L distilled water
B. Preparation of the Sample
a) Solid sample
Absorbance reading at
: 477 nm
Sample
Absorban
Absorbanc
Absorbance
Absorbance
Concentration
ce 1
e2
Average
(mg/mL)
0 (Blank)
2
4
6
8
10
15
Liquid Sample
0
0.456
0.826
1.099
1.312
1.315
1.060
0.068
0
0.443
0.825
1.097
1.223
1.319
1.067
0.039
0
0.434
0.831
1.096
1.310
1.373
1.152
0.038
SD
0
0.444
0.827
1.097
1.282
1.336
1.093
0.048
(Apple Juice)
Solid Sample
0.072
0.067
0.061
0.067
(Strawberry Jam)
: y =
: 0.9852
CALCULATIONS
1. Show
one
example
of
calculation
for
preparing
desired
Concentration:
= X x dilution factor (Final dilution / Initial dilution)
= 0.3481 x (250/10)
= 8.7025 mg/mL
DISCUSSION
Through the experiment, the concentration of reducing sugar which
are in apple juice (non-added sugar) and strawberry jam was determined
by using the Dinitrosalicyclic (DNS) colourimetric method. Both samples
which are solid sample and liquid sample was first prepared by weighing
approximately 3 g of solid sample and pipetting 5 mL of the liquid sample
respectively. The samples were then undergoing several dilutions after
being filtered properly into 100 mL of volumetric flask. The solid sample
solution was then diluted again by using ratio 1: 25 while the liquid
sample was diluted to 1: 10 dilution ratio. This is to ensure the
concentration in the sample is not too high and causing the sample
absorbance values is above highest point in the standard curve.
After that, a series of glucose standard solutions of 2 mg/mL, 4
mg/mL, 6 mg/mL, 8 mg/mL, 10 mg/mL and 15 mg/mL was prepared by
diluting 100 mg/mL glucose stock solution by using distilled water in 100
mL volumetric flask. Volume of glucose stock solution required to make
dilution was determined by using this formula:C1V1 = C2V2
Meanwhile, the measurement of absorbance was prepared by
pipetting each 1.0 mL of glucose standard solution and samples solution,
1.0 mL of DNS reagent and 3.0 mL of distilled water into the test tubes.
DNS reagent is a reagent used to determine sugar content especially
glucose. Meanwhile, the sample was prepared triplicate to minimize
human error. All the solution was mixed properly by using vortex before it
was placed in boiling water bath for 5 minutes to allow the reaction to
occur. In hot solution, the DNS reagent will reacts with the reducing sugars
producing the reddish-brown product (3-amino-5-nitosalicil acid).
As the concentration of the glucose standard solution increases, the
colour of the solution will be darker. As the more sugar there is, the more
carbonyl groups there are hence resulting in darker solution. After 5
minutes the test tubes was immediately transferred to container of ice
water to stop the reaction from occurring.
coloured solution was then measured with the uv-vis spectrometer at 477
nm.
From the results, the absorbances average was calculated and
reducing sugar standard curve (linear and non-linear) was constructed to
calculate linear regression (R2) and obtained equation derived from
standard curve. From the equation, the concentration of samples solution
(liquid and solid sample) can be calculated where it was obeying the BeerLambert Law. The calculations show that the concentration of liquid
sample (apple juice) is 2.494 mg/mL meanwhile the concentration of solid
sample (strawberry jam) is 8.7025 mg/mL.
The results show that the concentration of solid sample (strawberry
jam) is higher than liquid sample (apple juice) as the strawberry jam
contains a lot of glucose. This is because; the strawberry jam was made
with higher amount of sugar where it can inhibit the growth of bacteria
hence extending the shelf life of the jam. Meanwhile, apple juice that was
used is non-sugar added typed where there is no sugar added in their
juices preparation. The sugars were only obtained from the fruits itself
which is from apple. According to Malaysian Food Law and Regulation
(1985), the soluble solids for apple juice shall not less than 11.5 g.
Meanwhile, for jam the soluble solids should be at the 65 per cent of
soluble solids.
During the experiment, they are some sources of error that occur
which may affect the accuracy of the result. For example, there are
parallax error that happen when the eyes does not directly proportional to
the reading of the pipette. Poor pipetting technique may also contribute to
the error besides there might be the present of bubbles during pipetting.
In addition, enzyme mixture (DNS) might not be prepared correctly or the
stability limit had exceeded. To minimize these errors various precautions
should be taken such as, make sure our eyes are directly proportional
during reading the pipette measurement. The fresh enzyme mixture was
prepared and re-assay. Lastly, three consecutive of measuring need to be
carried out to eliminate the errors of the handlers.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the concentration of reducing sugar in apple juices
and strawberry jam was determined by using the Dinitrosalicyclic (DNS)
colourimetric method which are 2.494 mg/mL and 8.7025 mg/mL
respectively.
REFERENCE
C. Michael, (2003), How does Dinitrosalicyclic Acid stops the enzymesubstrate reaction in
http://www.researchgate.net/post/How_does_Dinitrosalicylic_Acid_stops_th
e_enzy
me-substrate_reaction_in_enzyme_assay
M. Dubois, K.A. Gilles, J.K. Hamilton, P.A. Rebers and Fred Smith, (2000),
Determination of Reducing Sugar by Colourimetric Method and Other
Substances, Anal.
April
pp
350356
2000
Retrieved
from
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ac60111a017
Malaysia. (1985). Food Act 1983 and Food Regulations 1985: Revised 7th
October, 1985: Act 281. Kuala Lumpur: MDC