POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (PROCES

All Submissions should be sent via E-Mail to: mailto:supplierppap@alto-shaam.com

Or submitted with PPAP Sample Parts, clearly marked on Packagin

PART NUMBER
TEAM MEMBERS
APPROVED BY

PROCESS FUNCTION

Page 1

POTENTIAL
FAILURE MODE

S
E
V
POTENTIAL
E
EFFECT OF
R
FAILURE
I
T
Y

C
L
A
S
S

POTENTIAL CAUSE
OF FAILURE

O
C
C
U
R

PFMEA TEMPLATE

CURRENT PROCESS
CONTROL

D
E
T
E
C
T

RISK
PRIORITY
NUMBER

PF-002

POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (PROCES

All Submissions should be sent via E-Mail to: mailto:supplierppap@alto-shaam.com

Or submitted with PPAP Sample Parts, clearly marked on Packagin

PART NUMBER
TEAM MEMBERS
APPROVED BY

PROCESS FUNCTION

Page 2

POTENTIAL
FAILURE MODE

S
E
V
POTENTIAL
E
EFFECT OF
R
FAILURE
I
T
Y

C
L
A
S
S

POTENTIAL CAUSE
OF FAILURE

O
C
C
U
R

PFMEA TEMPLATE

CURRENT PROCESS
CONTROL

D
E
T
E
C
T

RISK
PRIORITY
NUMBER

PF-002

POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (PROCES

All Submissions should be sent via E-Mail to: mailto:supplierppap@alto-shaam.com

Or submitted with PPAP Sample Parts, clearly marked on Packagin

PART NUMBER
TEAM MEMBERS
APPROVED BY

PROCESS FUNCTION

Page 3

POTENTIAL
FAILURE MODE

S
E
V
POTENTIAL
E
EFFECT OF
R
FAILURE
I
T
Y

C
L
A
S
S

POTENTIAL CAUSE
OF FAILURE

O
C
C
U
R

PFMEA TEMPLATE

CURRENT PROCESS
CONTROL

D
E
T
E
C
T

RISK
PRIORITY
NUMBER

PF-002

POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (PROCES

All Submissions should be sent via E-Mail to: mailto:supplierppap@alto-shaam.com

Or submitted with PPAP Sample Parts, clearly marked on Packagin

PART NUMBER
TEAM MEMBERS
APPROVED BY

PROCESS FUNCTION

Page 4

POTENTIAL
FAILURE MODE

S
E
V
POTENTIAL
E
EFFECT OF
R
FAILURE
I
T
Y

C
L
A
S
S

POTENTIAL CAUSE
OF FAILURE

O
C
C
U
R

PFMEA TEMPLATE

CURRENT PROCESS
CONTROL

D
E
T
E
C
T

RISK
PRIORITY
NUMBER

PF-002

ANALYSIS (PROCESS FMEA)

upplierppap@alto-shaam.com

ly marked on Packaging.
FMEA #
REVISION #
DATE

ACTION RESULTS

RECOMMENDED
ACTION

Page 5

RESPONSIBILITY
& TARGET
COMPLETION
DATE

ACTION(S)
TAKEN

S
E
V
E
R
I
T
Y

O
C
C
U
R

D
E
T
E
C
T

PFMEA TEMPLATE

RISK
PRIORITY
NUMBER

PF-002

ANALYSIS (PROCESS FMEA)

upplierppap@alto-shaam.com

ly marked on Packaging.
FMEA #
REVISION #
DATE

ACTION RESULTS

RECOMMENDED
ACTION

Page 6

RESPONSIBILITY
& TARGET
COMPLETION
DATE

ACTION(S)
TAKEN

S
E
V
E
R
I
T
Y

O
C
C
U
R

D
E
T
E
C
T

PFMEA TEMPLATE

RISK
PRIORITY
NUMBER

PF-002

ANALYSIS (PROCESS FMEA)

upplierppap@alto-shaam.com

ly marked on Packaging.
FMEA #
REVISION #
DATE

ACTION RESULTS

RECOMMENDED
ACTION

Page 7

RESPONSIBILITY
& TARGET
COMPLETION
DATE

ACTION(S)
TAKEN

S
E
V
E
R
I
T
Y

O
C
C
U
R

D
E
T
E
C
T

PFMEA TEMPLATE

RISK
PRIORITY
NUMBER

PF-002

ANALYSIS (PROCESS FMEA)

upplierppap@alto-shaam.com

ly marked on Packaging.
FMEA #
REVISION #
DATE

ACTION RESULTS

RECOMMENDED
ACTION

Page 8

RESPONSIBILITY
& TARGET
COMPLETION
DATE

ACTION(S)
TAKEN

S
E
V
E
R
I
T
Y

O
C
C
U
R

D
E
T
E
C
T

PFMEA TEMPLATE

RISK
PRIORITY
NUMBER

PF-002

POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANAL

PART NUMBER
TEAM MEMBERS

5011234
John Doe, Mary Smith, Donald Brown, Sam Jones

APPROVED BY

Sam Jones

PROCESS
FUNCTION

010

PROCESS FUNCTION

Receive Incoming
material

POTENTIAL
FAILURE MODE

POTENTIAL
EFFECT OF
FAILURE

material does not meet failure of corrosion

specification
test

S
E
V
E
R
I
T
Y

C
L
A
S
S

POTENTIAL CAUSE
OF FAILURE

Supplier sent wrong

material

O
C
C
U
R

CURRENT PROCESS
CONTROL

wrong tool used

020

030

Page 9

machining

blanking

oversized diameter

part fails to fit or

mate

wrong program
entered

material certifications with each

shipment

D
E
T
E
C
T

RISK
PRIORITY
NUMBER

84

48

first piece inspection

first piece inspection

improper use of gage

operator training

out of calibration

calibration procedure

tool wear

PFMEA TEMPLATE Sample

PF-002

POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANAL

PART NUMBER
TEAM MEMBERS

5011234
John Doe, Mary Smith, Donald Brown, Sam Jones

APPROVED BY

Sam Jones

PROCESS
FUNCTION

Page 10

PROCESS FUNCTION

POTENTIAL
FAILURE MODE

POTENTIAL
EFFECT OF
FAILURE

S
E
V
E
R
I
T
Y

C
L
A
S
S

POTENTIAL CAUSE
OF FAILURE

PFMEA TEMPLATE Sample

O
C
C
U
R

CURRENT PROCESS
CONTROL

D
E
T
E
C
T

RISK
PRIORITY
NUMBER

PF-002

POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANAL

PART NUMBER
TEAM MEMBERS

5011234
John Doe, Mary Smith, Donald Brown, Sam Jones

APPROVED BY

Sam Jones

PROCESS
FUNCTION

Page 11

PROCESS FUNCTION

POTENTIAL
FAILURE MODE

POTENTIAL
EFFECT OF
FAILURE

S
E
V
E
R
I
T
Y

C
L
A
S
S

POTENTIAL CAUSE
OF FAILURE

PFMEA TEMPLATE Sample

O
C
C
U
R

CURRENT PROCESS
CONTROL

D
E
T
E
C
T

RISK
PRIORITY
NUMBER

PF-002

POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANAL

PART NUMBER
TEAM MEMBERS

5011234
John Doe, Mary Smith, Donald Brown, Sam Jones

APPROVED BY

Sam Jones

PROCESS
FUNCTION

Page 12

PROCESS FUNCTION

POTENTIAL
FAILURE MODE

POTENTIAL
EFFECT OF
FAILURE

S
E
V
E
R
I
T
Y

C
L
A
S
S

POTENTIAL CAUSE
OF FAILURE

PFMEA TEMPLATE Sample

O
C
C
U
R

CURRENT PROCESS
CONTROL

D
E
T
E
C
T

RISK
PRIORITY
NUMBER

PF-002

ANALYSIS (PROCESS FMEA)

FMEA #
REVISION #
DATE

001
A
1/5/2013

ACTION RESULTS

RECOMMENDED
ACTION

RESPONSIBILITY &
TARGET
COMPLETION DATE

ACTION(S)
TAKEN

S
E
V
E
R
I
T
Y

D
E
T
E
C
T

O
C
C
U
R

RISK PRIORITY
NUMBER

none

Automatic Tool retrieval

system

Page 13

Bill White 02/28/13

Add last piece

inspection and
keep final piece
with Tool

PFMEA TEMPLATE Sample

PF-002

ANALYSIS (PROCESS FMEA)

FMEA #
REVISION #
DATE

001
A
1/5/2013

ACTION RESULTS

RECOMMENDED
ACTION

Page 14

RESPONSIBILITY &
TARGET
COMPLETION DATE

ACTION(S)
TAKEN

S
E
V
E
R
I
T
Y

O
C
C
U
R

D
E
T
E
C
T

PFMEA TEMPLATE Sample

RISK PRIORITY
NUMBER

PF-002

ANALYSIS (PROCESS FMEA)

FMEA #
REVISION #
DATE

001
A
1/5/2013

ACTION RESULTS

RECOMMENDED
ACTION

Page 15

RESPONSIBILITY &
TARGET
COMPLETION DATE

ACTION(S)
TAKEN

S
E
V
E
R
I
T
Y

O
C
C
U
R

D
E
T
E
C
T

PFMEA TEMPLATE Sample

RISK PRIORITY
NUMBER

PF-002

ANALYSIS (PROCESS FMEA)

FMEA #
REVISION #
DATE

001
A
1/5/2013

ACTION RESULTS

RECOMMENDED
ACTION

Page 16

RESPONSIBILITY &
TARGET
COMPLETION DATE

ACTION(S)
TAKEN

S
E
V
E
R
I
T
Y

O
C
C
U
R

D
E
T
E
C
T

PFMEA TEMPLATE Sample

RISK PRIORITY
NUMBER

PF-002

THE P-FMEA IS UTILIZED BY THE RESPONSIBLE TEAM TO ASSURE TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, POTENTIAL FAILURE MO

Part Number

Enter the name and part number for the system or component

Team Members

Enter the team or group responsible for developing the FMEA

Approved By

Enter the Engineer or Responsible individual for preparing the FMEA

FMEA Number

Enter the FMEA Document Number, which may be used for Tracking

Revision

Enter the Revision of the FMEA Document (not the Part Revision)

Date
Process Function

Enter Date FMEA was created

Enter a simple description of the process or operation being analyzed, i.e. Receiving, Stamping, Machining, Forming, e
Process Flow Chart.

Potential Failure
Mode
Potential Failure
Effect

Is defined as to the manner in which the process could potentially fail to meet the process intent. "How might the pro
Are defined as the effects of the failure. Examples might include: Does not fit, No power, Noisy, etc.

Severity

An assessment of the seriousness of the Effect. Should be assigned on a "1" to "10" scale, with "1" being No effect an

Class

Used to identify any "critical" characteristics for systems or components that may require additional process controls.
Is defined as to how the failure could occur, described in terms of something that can be corrected or controlled. Exam
(not
Error)
How Operator
frequently
the failure is projected to occur, on a scale of "1" - "10". The ranking number has a meaning. "10" me

Potential Cause of
Failure
Occurrence

meaning failure is unlikely. "5" meaning failure occurs occasionally, maybe 10 - 20% of the time.
Current Process
Controls
Detection

Risk Priority
Number
Recommended
Action
Responsibility and

Are descriptions of the controls that either prevent to extent possible or detect the failure should it occur. Examples m

An assessment of the probability that the Control Method will detect the potential failure. A "1" to "10" scale is used a
will prevent shipment of the defect. "1" meaning current control is almost certain to detect the failure. "10" meaning
expectation that control will detect the failure.

Is the Result of Multiplying each Value for "Severity", "Occurrence" and "Detection" (S x O x D). The RPN will be betwe
and those with the Highest Severity.

Corrective Action should be directed to those with highest RPN. Examples might include, design go/no-go gauge, auto
Enter the individual (or group) responsible for the recommended action and target completion date.

Target Date

Page 17

PFMEA Instructions

PF-003

Actions Taken

Enter a brief description of the action implemented

Resulting RPN

After the corrective action has been implemented, re-calculate results of S x O x D. If no action taken leave the RPN b

Page 18

PFMEA Instructions

PF-003

LURE MODES AND THEIR CAUSES HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED.

orming, etc in the order of the manufacturing process. This should carryover from the

ht the process or part fail", i.e. Bent, Cracked, Dirty, improper set-up, etc.

effect and "10" being May endanger user.

controls.
led. Examples might include: Part Missing, Improper Weld, Operator Failed to Machine Part

. "10" meaning, Failure is almost inevitable, likely to occur more than 1 in 3 times. "1"

amples might include Error Proofing Fixtures, Operator measurements, Visual Checks, etc.
is used and assumes a Failure has occurred. What form of detection is currently in use that
meaning there is no known control to detect the failure. "5" meaning there is a Moderate

be between "1" and "10,000" and attention should be given to those with the highest value

uge, automate weld operation, create Visual Aid, etc.

Page 19

PFMEA Instructions

PF-003

he RPN blank.

Page 20

PFMEA Instructions

PF-003