Optik
journal homepage: www.elsevier.de/ijleo
Department of Material Science and Engineering, Shenzhen Graduate School, Harbin Institute of Technology, Xili, Shenzhen 518055, China
Research Institute of Tsinghua University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518057, China
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 4 May 2011
Accepted 11 October 2011
Keywords:
SnO2
Nanocomposite
Photoluminescence
a b s t r a c t
SnO2 CuO nanocomposite was synthesized by impregnating SnO2 nanowires with CuCl2 solution and
subsequent calcination. SEM and XRD were used to characterize the morphology and structure of the
product. The optical properties were analyzed by Raman and photoluminescence (PL) spectra at room
temperature. Except the strong orange emission of SnO2 , the PL spectrum showed a red shoulder at
678 nm which originated from the interface between SnO2 and CuO.
2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Tin oxide (SnO2 ) is a wide bandgap (3.6 eV) n-type semiconductor which receives great attention in the elds of gas sensors,
solar cells, light emission and lithium-ion batteries [16], etc. As is
well known, introducing another material to synthesize composite
material is an effective way to improve the physical and chemical properties. For example, graphene [79] is used to enhance its
electrochemical property; In2 O3 , WO3 , ZnO and CuO [1014] are
introduced to enhance gas sensing property; TiO2 and CuO [15,16]
are used to improve photocatalytic property. Among them CuO is a
distinct p-type metal oxide semiconductor with a bandgap of 1.2 eV
[1] and SnO2 CuO nanocomposite is synthesized for the applications in gas sensing, photocatalysis and electrochemistry areas
[1619]. However, its optical properties are rarely been reported.
In this paper, we introduced a simple facile method to synthesize
the SnO2 CuO nanocomposite and characterized its optical properties with Raman and photoluminescence spectra. The obtained
SnO2 CuO nanocomposite showed strong orange band emission
with a red shoulder at 678 nm, which had potential applications in
the elds of gas sensor, photocatalysis and lithium-ion batteries.
2. Experiments
Details of the synthesis of SnO2 CuO nanocomposite were as
follows: First SnO2 nanowires were grown by thermal evaporation
method. A ceramic boat loaded with Sn powder was placed in the
middle of a horizontal furnace. The substrate was Si wafer which
Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 755 26033290; fax: +86 755 26033504.
E-mail address: zhouweijupiter@yahoo.com.cn (W. Zhou).
0030-4026/$ see front matter 2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2011.10.027
was coated with Au lm. During the whole growth process the pressure in the furnace was kept at ambient atmospheric pressure and
high purity argon was used as carrier gas. The growth was performed at 1000 C for 1 h with a sparse of O2 introduced into the
furnace. Thereafter the product was impregnated into CuCl2 solution (1 wt%). After air-drying, the sample was heated to 900 C and
kept for 6 h in air atmosphere.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S-4700) and X-ray
diffraction (XRD, Rigaku D/Max 2500) were used to characterize the
morphology and structure of the sample. Raman and photoluminescence spectra were measured at room temperature (RT) using
Renishaw Invia Raman spectrometer with 514.5 nm argon ion laser
and 325 nm HeCd laser, respectively.
3. Results and discussion
The morphology of SnO2 nanowires and SnO2 CuO nanocomposite is shown in Fig. 1. From the low-magnication image of
Fig. 1(a), it was clear that the SnO2 nanowires had diameters range
from 100 to 500 nm, while length ranging from 30 to 60 m. One
of the thinnest nanowires with diameter about 80 nm was presented in Fig. 1(b). Unlike the smooth surface of SnO2 nanowires,
the SnO2 CuO nanocomposite had some clusters formed between
the intersections of SnO2 nanowires. As shown in the magnied
image of Fig. 1(d), the cluster was formed by particles with average
diameter about 150 nm.
The XRD pattern of SnO2 CuO nanocomposite is shown in Fig. 2.
All the diffraction peaks were in good agreement with tetragonal
phase of SnO2 (JCPDS No. 41-1445) and monoclinic CuO (JCPDS
No. 41-0254). Except the peaks of SnO2 , the peaks located at about
35.7 , 48.9 and 68.2 corresponding to (0 0 2), (2 0 2) and (1 1 3)
planes of monoclinic CuO, respectively. The sharp and strong peaks
2172
Fig. 1. SEM images of SnO2 nanowires (a), (b) and SnO2 CuO nanocomposite (c), (d).
4. Conclusion
2173
[11] S.L Bai, D.Q. Li, D.M. Han, R.X. Luo, A.F. Chen, C.L. Chung, Preparation, characterization of WO3 SnO2 nanocomposites and their sensing properties for NO2 ,
Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 150 (2010) 749755.
[12] X. Jia, H. Fan, L. Qin, C. Yang, Hierarchically structure SnO2 /ZnO nanocomposites: preparation, growth mechanism and gas sensing property, J. Disper. Sci.
Technol. 31 (2010) 14051408.
[13] X. Xue, L. Xing, Y. Chen, S. Shi, Y. Wang, T. Wang, Synthesis and H2 S sensing
properties of CuOSnO2 core/shell PN-junction nanorods, J. Phys. Chem. C 112
(2008) 1215712160.
[14] X.H. Kong, Y.D. Li, High sensitivity of CuO modied SnO2 nanoribbons to H2 S at room temperature, Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 105 (2005)
449453.
[15] E.M. EI-Maghraby, Y. Nakamura, S. Rengakuji, Composite TiO2 SnO2 nanostructured lms prepared by spin-coating with high photocatalytic performance,
Catal. Commun. 9 (2008) 23572360.
[16] X.J. Zheng, Y.J. Wei, L.F. Wei, B. Xie, M.B. Wei, Photocatalytic H2 production from
acetic acid solution over CuO/SnO2 nanocomposites under UV irradiation, Int.
J. Hydrogen Energ. 35 (2010) 1170911718.
[17] H.L. Xia, H.S. Zhuang, T. Zhang, D.C. Xiao, Photocatalytic degradation of Acid Blue
62 over CuOSnO2 nanocomposite photocatalyst under simulated sunlight, J.
Environ. Sci. 19 (2007) 11411145.
[18] M.Y. Ma, Z.Q. He, Z.B. Xiao, K.L. Huang, L.Z. Xiong, X.M. Wu, Synthesis and
electrochemical properties of SnO2 CuO nanocomposite powders, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 16 (2006) 791794.
[19] J.H. Yoon, J.S. Kim, Gas sensing properties of nano-crystalline SnO2 CuO compounds, Met. Mater. Int. 16 (2010) 773777.
[20] J. Liu, X. Chen, W. Wang, B. Song, Q. Huang, Secondary facet-selective nucleation and growth: highly oriented straight SnO2 nanowire arrays on primary
microrods, Cryst. Growth Des. 9 (2009) 17571761.
[21] W.Y. Yin, B.Q. Wei, C.W. Hu, In situ growth of SnO2 nanowires on the surface
of Au-coated Sn grains using water-assisted chemical vapor deposition, Chem.
Phys. Lett. 471 (2009) 1116.
[22] H.F. Goldstein, D. Kim, P.Y. Yu, L.C. Bourne, J.-P. Chaminade, L. Nganga, Raman
study of CuO single crystals, Phys. Rev. B 41 (1990) 71927194.
[23] O. Madelung, Semiconductors: Data Handbook, 3rd ed., Springer, 2004,
p. 450.
[24] J.H. He, T.H. Wu, C.L. Hsin, K.M. Li, L.J. Chen, Y.L. Chueh, et al., Beaklike SnO2
nanorods with strong photoluminescent and eld-emission properties, Small
2 (2006) 116120.
[25] L.J. Li, K. Yu, H.B. Mao, Z.Q. Zhu, Photoluminescence and eld-emission properties of Cu-doped SnO2 , Appl. Phys. A 99 (2010) 865869.
[26] C. Jin, K. Baek, S. Park, H.W. Kim, W.I. Lee, C. Lee, Inuence of SnO2 coating
and thermal annealing on the structure and luminescence properties of CuO
nanorods, Solid State Commun. 150 (2010) 18121817.
[27] S.S. Chang, H.J. Lee, H.J. Park, Photoluminescence properties of spark-processed
CuO, Ceram. Int. 31 (2005) 411415.