History
The first hollow concrete block was designed in
1890 by Harmon S. Palmer in the United
States. After 10 years of experimenting, Palmer
patented the design in 1900. Palmer's blocks
were 8 in (20.3 cm) by 10 in (25.4 cm) by 30 in
(76.2 cm), and they were so heavy they had to
be lifted into place with a small crane. By 1905,
an
estimated
1,500
companies
were
manufacturing concrete blocks in the United
States.
DEFINITION
A hollow masonry unit is
defined as having a net
cross-sectional area in every
plane, parallel to the bearing
surface,
less
than
75
percent of the gross crosssectional area in the same
plane
3
MATERIALS USED
(2)Mixing
(1)Proportioning
(4)Curing
(3)Compacting
(5)Drying
SIZE
Quality Specifications
Cavities
Shell Thickness
The shell thickness of blocks shall not be less
than 40 mm for sizes A & B and 20 mm for other
sizes.
Aggregates
Passes through IS sieve 1285mm
15% should retained on IS sieve 10 mm and 1040% on IS sieve 4.75 mm
Joints
Density
Drying Shrinkage
The drying shrinkage of average of three blocks
when unrestrained shall not exceed 0.004 per
cent.
Water Absorption
The water absorption (av. 3 blocks)
shall not exceed 240 kg per cu meter.
Crushing Strength
The average crushing strength of eight blocks that are
immersed in water maintaining a temp. of 27o C + 2oC
for a period of 24 hrs bedded with cement sand mortar
shall be not less than 50 kg per square cm of gross
area.
Moisture contents
The moisture content (average of 3 blocks) of the dried
blocks on being immersed in water shall not exceed
0.03 %.
11
12
Corner bonding
Estimating Data
Blocks
There are 1212 blocks in every square meter of wall surface area.
Mortar
1m3 of mortar is required for approximately 800
blocks.
For a 1:1:6 mortar mix, the approximate quantities
required for 1m3 of mortar are:
6 bags cement
6 bags lime
1.2 m3 of damp sand (allowing 20% bulking)
Grout
Approximate quantities for filling concrete blocks
and elements:
RETAINING WALLS
COLUMNS
COMPOUND WALLS
USES
HOLLOW BLOCK
In view of their versatile uses and
properties, hollow concrete blocks are in
demand
by
departments/agencies
engaged in construction including PWD,
Housing Boards and Urban Development
Corporations, Road Transport Corporation
and Forest Departments.
15
16
17
18
1.
One square meter of partition wall system is chosen. All emissions, energy
consumption and materials are based on this functional unit. E.g. MJ/m2, kg
CO2e/m2 etc.
4. Interpretation of the
results.
EMBODIED ENERGY
Saving in mortar for lying of blocks as compared to ordinary brick work. Saving in mortar for plasterwork.
Uniform Plaster thickness of 12 mm can be maintained due to precision of the size of blocks as
compared to brick work where plaster thickness of average 20 mm is required to produce uniform and
even plastered surface due to variations in the sizes of bricks.
Insulation of walls is achieved due to cavity, which provides energy saving for
all times. Similarly hollowness results in sound insulation
Paint on finished walls can be applied due to cavity, which provides energy
saving for all times. Similarly hollowness results in sound insulation.
Maintenance cost of the hollow concrete block is less than brick masonry.
23
DISADVANTAGE
24
The dead load of hollow concrete block is much lesser than a solid block;
due to this, one can work with the structural engineer and reduce steel
consumption in construction.
If these blocks are engineered properly then dimensional accuracy and high
finishing quality is obtained
Hollow concrete blocks have additives to improve their water resistance and
seepage minimization
25
The hollow concrete block adopt to modern design forms, richness of the
texture etc.
Minimum maintenance cost and cost competitiveness with other materials make
it a preferred material for todays building.
Hollow concrete blocks can effectively be used for cold storage and industrial
go downs as they are thermally effective.
26
CASE STUDY
SPRING FIELD ohio
Economy: Cost per cubic meter of brick masonry comes out to be Rs.3875 and Cost per
cubic meter of brick masonry comes out to be Rs.3290. The cost of block walls per metre3 of
hollow concrete masonry came out to be 17.78%less than that of brick walls. So, block
masonry was economical than brick masonry.
29
30
CONCLUSION
Compressive strength of the brick units and brick masonry wall came out to be more than
compressive strength of HCB units and hollow concrete wall masonry.
Sound insulation property of hollow concrete masonry was more than that of brick masonry.
Thermal insulation property of hollow concrete masonry was more than that of brick masonry
due to presence of air in hollow concrete units.
As the cost of block walls per meter cube of masonry comes out to be lesser than that of brick
31
Conclusion of Presentation
1. Being light in weight HCBs provide economy in design of sub-structure due to reduction
of the loads.
2. Laying of blocks saves mortar as compared with ordinary brick work. There is saving in
mortar plaster work too.
3. Cavity of blocks helps achieving insulation of walls and provides energy saving for all
times. Hollowness results in sound insulation.
4. There is no problem of appearance of salts thereby saving in maintenance of final
finishes to the
walls.
5. Laying of blocks is much quicker as compared to brick work hence, saving in time.
6. HCBs are environmentally eco-friendly.
7. Factor of safety HCB masonry is more than brick masonry.
32
REFERENCE
www.ecologicbuilding.com
www.rockyhollowblocks.com
www.ustudy.in
www.researchpublish.com
33
Thank YOU..
34