Case Studies
http://ccs.sagepub.com/
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
Additional services and information for Clinical Case Studies can be found at:
Email Alerts: http://ccs.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts
Subscriptions: http://ccs.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations: http://ccs.sagepub.com/content/7/6/555.refs.html
Demonstrating Research-to-Practice
Translation
Suzanne Meeks
University of Louisville
Robin Sublett
Kentucky State Reformatory
Irene Kostiwa
James R. Rodgers
University of Louisville
Donna Haddix
Kentucky State Reformatory
We describe a theoretically grounded and empirically developed intervention for depression with
older men in a state reformatory nursing home. As the number of prisoners aging in place rises,
there is a critical need for research on mental health interventions in prison nursing homes where
inmates may be at high risk for depression and suicide. The participants in this project were four
male residents in the Kentucky state prison system nursing home; all four had diagnoses of major
depressive episodes. BE-ACTIV, a behavioral treatment for depression, is a hybrid approach that
combines one-to-one sessions with the depressed resident and work with staff. One-to-one sessions motivate the resident to engage in new activities, while meetings with nursing home staff
break down barriers to completion of pleasant events. Over the 10-week treatment, depressive
symptoms declined, and global functioning increased an average of 13 points per participant. Two
of the participants showed improved self-reported negative affect. Study results suggest that
BE-ACTIV is feasible in the prison nursing home and has the potential to improve the quality of
life for medically frail prisoners by helping them to identify meaningful or pleasant activities. The
cases illustrate importance of therapeutic relationships in the context of improving depressive
symptoms, and the possibility of building effective relationships in a setting with multiple barriers to effective treatment.
Keywords:
555
556
557
adults that have been studied, but because the overall risk was much higher than for community-residing elders, it seems likely that older prisoners in nursing homes are at particular risk for depressive illness. When treatment needs of this same sample were examined,
it appeared that depressive disorders were medically undertreated (Fazel, Hope, ODonnell,
& Jacoby, 2004). Prisoners of all ages with mental illnesses are at risk for suicidal behavior (Senior et al., 2007), and suicide risk is correlated with age. Prisoners who have been in
prison longer are at higher risk for suicide (Konrad et al., 2007). In their comparison of
British prisoners with and without charted suicide risk, Senior and colleagues (2007) found
that those at risk had higher unmet support needs in the areas of safety, psychological
distress, and daily activities.
In their 2005 review of research on mental disorders in prison, Fazel and Lubbe conclude
that although epidemiological work and work on attention to interventions for violent
behaviors constitute a starting point, there is a critical need for research into what interventions can be effectively implemented in prison settings. There is some evidence that
prisoners do receive antidepressant medication (Baillargeon, Black, Contreras, Grady, &
Pulvino, 2002), although approximately 20% of prisoners diagnosed with major depression
did not receive antidepressants in this study, and there were gender, racial, and ethnic disparities in who received antidepressants and what type of antidepressants were prescribed.
Most state prisons, and all federal prisons, offer psychological and psychiatric services
(Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2003). Although some therapists have written about treating
prisoners (e.g., Pollock, Stowell-Smith, & Gpfert, 2006; Saunders, 2001), there is virtually no research on mental health interventions for this population, and the effectiveness of
interventions used with prisoners, particularly older prisoners, is unknown.
558
outcomes for the elders they care for. Our preliminary work adapting this intervention to
the nursing home setting is summarized in two previous articles (Meeks et al., 2006; Meeks
et al., 2008). In place of family caregivers, BE-ACTIV requires that the therapist form a
working relationship with the activities staff of the nursing facility. This hybrid approach
to mental health care involves a combination of one-to-one sessions with the depressed resident and involvement of staff in implementing the plan for increasing pleasant events. Oneto-one sessions serve to motivate the resident to engage in new activities, while meetings
with nursing home staff help to break down barriers to the implementation of pleasant
events. In the pilot work, BE-ACTIV shows promise of improving depressive diagnoses,
increasing positive affect, and increasing activity levels of nursing home residents as compared to residents randomly assigned to treatment as usual (Meeks et al., 2008). Given that
prisoners in a correctional nursing home environment are at high risk for depression and suicide, and the prison environment affords few opportunities for pleasant daily activities, it
seems logical that BE-ACTIV could be a useful intervention for that setting.
2 Case Presentation
The participants in this demonstration project were four male prisoners who were residents in the nursing facility for the Kentucky state prison system. The participants volunteered to participate as part of a research project; the chief psychologist of the nursing
facility identified all residents who were presenting with depressed mood, had diagnoses of
depression, or were being treated with antidepressants. Of the 78 inmates on the unit, the
chief psychologist identified approximately 46 as potentially eligible (meeting criteria for
a depressive disorder and having a Mini-Mental Status Exam [MMSE] score of 14 or
above). Of these, 21 consented to screening, but only 6 were found to meet criteria for the
study after the initial research assessment. One of these men was transferred off the unit
and another died before they could receive the intervention; we completed the intervention
with the other four.
Table 1 shows the ages, race, and diagnostic status of the participants at baseline assessment. The youngest participant was 47,1 the oldest was 81, but they all had considerable
medical morbidity and all but one had some mild cognitive impairment. After baseline
assessment, they received weekly sessions of BE-ACTIV for 10 weeks, with a follow-up
assessment at the end of the 10 weeks. The therapists were two doctoral students in clinical psychology, one male and one female, with prior clinical experience in both inpatient
and nursing home settings, but with no prior experience in forensic settings. The staff member who collaborated in the treatment was a female recreational therapist assigned to the
nursing unit for several hours per week. Prior to her participation, she received a 3-hr
in-service training by the first author about the BE-ACTIV program, depression in general,
and her role in implementing pleasant events (see Meeks & Burton, 2004).
The prison nursing unit is configured more like a nursing home than a prison ward, with
a centrally located nursing station, semiprivate rooms, a mess hall, and a lounge area with
a TV. There is also a fenced, secure, outdoor patio with a small garden. Inmates of the nursing home are generally not allowed to be on the yard with the general prison population.
Recreational activities are usually held in the mess hall. Weekly sessions were held either
559
Table 1
Participant Baseline Characteristics
Age
Race
DSM-IV diagnosis
GAF
GDS
MMSE
COOP
Positive affecta
Negative affecta
Mr. A
Mr. B
61
African
American
MDD recurrent,
in partial
remission
47
African
American
Bipolar disorder,
current episode
MDE, severe,
without psychotic
features
53
21
29
10
14
10
60
18
24
7
5
10
Mr. C
Mr. D
58
White
81
White
MDD recurrent, in
partial remission
MDD, single
episode, severe,
without psychotic
features
53
25
26
8
14
15
45
22
23
13
9
20
Note: COOP, Dartmouth COOP Scales of Functioning; DSM-IV, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disordersfourth edition; GAF, global assessment of functioning; GDS, Geriatric Depression Scale; MDD,
major depressive disorder; MDE, major depressive episode; MMSE, Mini-Mental Status Exam.
a. Positive and negative affect are sums of five items for baseline week.
in the residents room or in available office space on the nursing or psychiatric units. Care
was taken to optimize privacy but at times staff may have been within earshot of the shared
office space, or a roommate may have been present. During the 10 weeks of treatment,
therapists recorded weekly self-reported mood ratings, pleasant events, and the time that
the recreational therapist spent with the residents. The therapists completed diagnostic and
symptom assessments in the week following the tenth session for all except Mr. D, who was
in solitary confinement at the end of the treatment.
Mr. A
Mr. A was an African American male who had been in and out of the prison system in the
past and was incarcerated for a little more than a year at the time of the study because of a
violation of his parole. Staff reported that he was irritable, quiet, and withdrawn, rarely
560
participating in activities, spending much of his time in his room watching television or sleeping. He admitted that he had been hibernating because of ongoing worries about his health,
parole, and marriage. He also complained of nerves and said that he did not like being in
crowds or around other people, especially his fellow inmates. Mr. A reported having strained
relationships with most of his family members, although his aunt and cousin remained in contact with him. During the initial interview and early sessions, his speech was relatively quiet
and he appeared somewhat guarded in his responses. Mr. A was placed on the nursing unit following the loss of his leg resulting from poorly controlled diabetes mellitus and peripheral vascular disease. He had triple bypass surgery approximately 4 years prior to treatment. He
suffered a heart attack just a year before his incarceration, which he felt marked the beginning
of his current depressive episode. His health status and access to adequate health care were key
concerns for him; he feared dying in prison. Symptoms of depressed mood, weight gain,
insomnia, lack of energy, and difficulty concentrating endorsed at the initial interview contributed to a diagnosis of recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD) in partial remission.
Mr. B
Mr. B was an African American who had been incarcerated for 2 years. He was referred to
the program because staff members reported that he rarely spoke, did not attend activities, and
left his room only to eat or when instructed to do so. He would constantly lie in bed and watch
television even though only one TV channel was available to him. During the initial assessment, Mr. B was reserved and quiet, rarely making eye contact or speaking except to answer
direct questions. He stated that he didnt have much energy and that he felt really down
almost all of the time. His medical record included a diagnosis of schizophrenia, but based on
his endorsements on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID), he met criteria for
a history of mania and reported no psychosis outside of the context of affective episodes; so he
received the diagnosis of bipolar disorder, most recent episode depressed. His current episode
was rated as severe, but there was no evidence of current psychotic features. He agreed to participate in the project in hopes that he would feel better.
Mr. B stated that he felt that he had a normal childhood and had played football in high
school but that he always felt different than other people. He had no immediate family and
was divorced from his only wife. This was his second time in prison and he was determined
that his behavior would be such that he would be assured of parole at the earliest possible
opportunity. He reported that he had been moved to the prison nursing home to monitor and
care for his diabetes. Mr. B had many friends on the yard (in the general prison population),
and the move to the nursing home had isolated him from these friends because visits
between units required a special request sanction by the wardens office. Mr. B noted that
the larger rooms in the nursing facility were nice but that he missed his friends.
Mr. C
Mr. C was a white man who had been incarcerated for approximately 13 years. Staff suggested that he might be a good candidate for the study because of ongoing difficulties with
depressed mood, sleep disruption, and irritability. Despite these symptoms, Mr. C maximized
his daily routine by participating in available activities and remaining engaged with staff and
561
fellow inmates. He embodied the essence of behavioral activation even before his participation
in the study, and often stated I have to stay busy and hinted of a looming deeper depression.
Mr. C related a history of severe depressive episodes and alcohol abuse that began in his late
20s; he had a history of at least one grave suicide attempt. Mr. C was on the nursing unit primarily because of visual impairment combined with other medical problems. During the
initial interview, he complained of visions of bright lights and images of arbitrary floating
objects, which interfered with his concentration during the day and prevented him from
obtaining restorative sleep at night. He said these obtrusive visions began subsequent to a surgical procedure on his eyes. During the initial interview, his symptoms of depressed mood,
weight gain, insomnia, fatigue, thoughts of death, and significant ongoing distress contributed
to a diagnosis of MDD in partial remission. Interpersonally, Mr. C was very pleasant and agreeable but was noted to have a low frustration tolerance. He became visibly irritated when discussing his lack of control in terms of an inability to accomplish certain tasks either because
of his blindness or because of the restrictive environment of the prison.
Mr. D
Mr. D was a white man who had served more than 30 years in the prison system. The
staff noted that Mr. D was not liked by other inmates on the unit and that his problematic
and often oppositional behavior made him difficult to treat. Mr. D showed signs of memory loss and his score on the MMSE was a 23, indicating significant cognitive impairment.
He was often incontinent and resisted attempts by the staff to help him with self-care.
Usually, such resistance was met by calling the prison guard who would order him to bathe
and change clothes on the threat of punishment involving solitary confinement and loss of
privileges. On the SCID, Mr. D met threshold for all major depression items, earning him
a diagnosis of MDE, severe, without psychotic features. He had no recollection of a prior
episode, nor were any documented in his medical record.
Mr. D reported that he was a self-taught engineer and that he designed heating and air conditioning systems. He had worked for many years in a supervisory position in the prison
mechanical shop and had been involved in training other prisoners in skilled trades that could
be useful in and out of the prison system. Mr. D noted that because of his prison jobs, he felt
that his life had been useful. He put a great deal of emphasis on his ability to do real work.
As his memory difficulties progressed he was gradually removed from the teaching positions
and then from the prison shop. Ultimately, (probably because of his cognitive decline) he was
placed in the prison nursing home where he spent his time occasionally watching TV, eating
food from the prison commissary, and sleeping. Because of the sale of his home and belongings following the death of his wife, Mr. D had some money in the bank; he believed that
other prisoners only talked to him so that they could borrow money or share in his food. He
did not have any positive social relationships with other inmates on the unit.
4 Assessment
Diagnoses were determined using a modified version of the SCID (First, Spitzer,
Gibbon, & Williams, 2002). Either the first author or one of the therapists administered the
562
SCID 2 weeks prior to the first therapy session, and then again in the week following session 10. Depressive symptoms were also assessed using the Geriatric Depression Scale
(GDS; Brink et al., 1982), a 30-item, self-report scale designed for use with older adults.
We also administered the MMSE (Folstein, Folstein, & McHugh, 1975) as a screen for cognitive impairment, and the Dartmouth COOP Scales of Functioning (Nelson, Wasson,
Johnson, & Hays, n.d.). The COOP chart method of assessing functional status was developed by the Dartmouth Primary Care Cooperative Information Project (COOP) to provide
researchers and clinicians with a quick but valid means to assess adult and adolescent functioning in primary care (Nelson et al., 1987). COOP charts used included interference with
daily activities, interference with social activities, health changes, and overall self-rated
health, yielding a functional impairment scale ranging from 4 to 25 with higher scores indicating higher impairment. Participants rated their mood weekly using the Philadelphia
Geriatric Center Positive and Negative Affect Rating Scale (PNAR; Lawton, Kleban, Dean,
Rajagopal, & Parmelee, 1992). The PNAR produces positive and negative affect scales
each with a possible range of 5-25. We obtained demographic information, medical diagnoses, and medications from the prison health records. Results of baseline assessments are
shown in Table 1.
During the first session of BE-ACTIV, the therapist completes the initial version of the
Pleasant Events ScheduleNursing Home Version (PES-NH; Meeks, Heuerman, Ramsey,
Welsh, & White, 2005). This instrument helps the therapist and resident identify potentially
pleasant events that could be incorporated into the residents daily routine. An activity staff
member is invited to attend these first sessions. In this project, the recreational therapist
was present at all four first sessions to help the therapists determine what activities were
feasible within the prison nursing home. The follow-up version of the PES-NH was used
weekly during the therapy sessions to determine the number and pleasantness of the mens
activities during the time between sessions.
5 Case Conceptualization
With the exception of Mr. C, each of these men presented with pronounced reduction in
daily activities and a sense of hopelessness about the possibility of engaging in any activities that might be pleasant. As a result of placement on the nursing unit, all the men had
experienced significant losses related to meaningful social contact, including opportunities
to interact with friends and relatives on the yard (A, B, and C), and the opportunity to
engage in meaningful work including teaching others (D). They also reported reduction in
opportunities for leisure activities such as access to a weight room and library, and loss of
control over the availability of supplies or materials such as books, newspapers, art supplies, or television stations. Thus, each was experiencing reduced opportunities for positive
affect, in combination with increasing experiences of negative affect related to increased
health problems and disability, worries about parole (for A and B), and family stressors (A
and C). Figure 1 depicts these circumstances within the context of the conceptual basis of
BE-ACTIV from the work of Lewinsohn and colleagues (Lewinsohn et al., 1985). The
shaded box indicates the primary target of the intervention to increase opportunities for, and
control over, pleasant events so that the participants will experience increased positive
563
Figure 1
Conceptual Model of BE-ACTIV in the Prison Setting
Reduced opportunities for
social interaction and work
Loss of control over daily
activities
Increased negative affect
Antecedents:
Increased physical/cognitive
disability
Move to more restrictive
prison unit
Reduced positive
reinforcement
Reduced positive
affect
Increased negative
self-awareness
(negative cognitions)
Increased depression
(Persistent Dysphoria)
Vulnerabilities
Negative consequences
of Depression: Reduced
activity, negative
interpersonal interactions,
poorer health, more need
for care
affect. Note that although it is unavoidable that there will be some attention to reducing
negative affect and negative events associated therewith, this is not the focus of BE-ACTIV
because many sources of negative affect in nursing homes, and particularly in a prison nursing home, are unavoidable and largely immutable.
564
Table 2
Posttreatment Outcomes
Mr. A
DSM-IV diagnosis
MDD recurrent,
in partial
remission
GAF
GDS
MMSE
COOP
Positive affecta
Negative affecta
70
12
25
7
5
13
Mr. B
BPI, most recent
episode depressed,
in partial
remission
60
18
26
10
16
7
Mr. C
MDD recurrent,
in partial
remission
75
10
26
5
14
10
Mr. D
Unable to
complete
final
SCID
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Note: See note to Table 1. NA, not available; SCID, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV.
a. Positive and negative affect are sums of the final week of therapy.
physical disability remained stable across the 10 weeks. Depressive symptoms declined for
all participants for whom we were able to assess outcomes, and global functioning
increased an average of 13 points per participant. Specific characteristics of treatment
course for the participants are summarized in the following paragraphs.
Figure 2
Change in Pleasant Activities (Frequency Pleasantness)
Over 12 Weeks for Each Prisoner
60.00
50.00
Frequency x pleasantness
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
Session1
Session 2
Session 3
Session 4
Session 5
Mr. A
Session 6
Mr. B
Session 7
Mr. C
Session 8
Session 9 Session 10
Mr. D
Figure 3
Change in Positive and Negative Affect Over 12 Weeks for Mr. A
4.50
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
B1
B2
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
T7
T8
T9
T10
565
566
Figure 4
Change in Positive and Negative Affect Over 12 Weeks for Mr. B
4.50
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
B1
B2
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
T7
T8
T9
T10
Figure 5
Change in Positive and Negative Affect Over 12 Weeks for Mr. C
4.50
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
B1
B2
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
T7
T8
T9
T10
567
Figure 6
Change in Positive and Negative Affect Over 12 Weeks for Mr. D
4.50
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
B1
B2
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
T7
T8
T9
T10
568
The weekly visit from the therapist appeared to become a pleasant event in itself. His
response to the therapist is evident in both activity level (Figure 2) and negative affect
(Figure 4). Mr. B noted that he looked forward to the meeting each week. Early in the
intervention, his compliance with planned activities seemed to be mainly the result of his
stated desire to fulfill the therapists requests, illustrating how the one-to-one relationship
can serve as a motivator to encourage depressed residents to try activities that they otherwise would not. As time progressed, the pleasure Mr. B gained from activity participation
appeared to become the impetus for his continued activity participation, even resulting in
participation in spontaneous activities such as talking to people on the unit, attending movie
night, and going outside more often than requested.
569
discussed frustrations with unfulfilled needs such as not being able to get his laundry done,
not finding a chair to sit in at church, and most importantly his worry about his brothers
legal issues. These setbacks were addressed by focusing Mr. C on those things that were
within his control, such as the activities that he scheduled and in which he engaged.
570
Segregation takes place in a small cell where the prisoner is kept for 23 hr per day, with little contact with others and only few possessions (Bender, 2005). Mr. D was in segregation
during the final week of treatment and was unable to have his final assessment or meeting
with his therapist, as it was expected that he would be there for some time.
7 Complicating Factors
Clearly, prison nursing homes have characteristics that pose unique barriers to successful treatment of and recovery from depressive disorders. Some of the barriers we encountered are shared with other nursing homes. For example, the recreational therapist had very
little access to or budget for supplies that might enhance activities such as art projects, reading, and movies. Frequently this lack of an activities budget is found in nursing homes in
the private sector as well, although not surprisingly we found the lack of supplies to be
more extreme in the correctional setting. The limited amount of time the recreational therapist could be on the unit was also a problem, and staff shortages are frequently found in
private sector nursing homes as well. Lack of a private place to hold therapy sessions is a
problem that frequently occurs in all nursing homes, but this is significantly more of an
issue in the prison because of security considerations. Such lack of privacy may, especially
in prisons, impede open communication between the therapist and the client, and therefore
limit the power of the therapy relationship to effect change through motivating the client.
Nevertheless, all four of these men appear to have developed good working relationships
with their therapists, and all commented on the importance of the visits to them and for
motivating them to try new activities.
As nursing home patients are typically medically at risk and struggle with multiple
chronic health problems, the threat of illness events may have an impact on fluctuations in
mood, therapy compliance, and outcomes. We saw this in the prison setting as well. Mr. A,
B, and C were younger than the average nursing home resident, but all three suffered from
multiple chronic illnesses and disabilities and were significantly impaired in their ability to
navigate in their environments. Mr. A was particularly sensitive to changes in his health and
worried extensively about dying in prison. All four perceived, and complained of, poorer
medical care than they believed they would have received outside of prison. Although
Mr. B and C had relatively stable health over the time we worked with them, both Mr. A
and especially Mr. D showed medical instability that affected their mood and activity participation. Mr. Ds declining cognitive capacity was especially problematic because it
resulted in behavioral symptoms that within the prison context were interpreted and dealt
with as disciplinary infractions. This more punitive response was probably exacerbated by
both Mr. Ds premorbid personality and the type of crime for which he had been convicted;
simply put, he was not an easy person to like. His case, however, illustrates the effectiveness of individual therapy sessions for building a positive relationship that can lead to positive change against this backdrop of unstable or declining health.
Other life stressors also complicated the course of treatment for these men. Perhaps the
most powerful of these was the worry about parole hearings; in the case of Mr. A, denial of
parole constituted a major challenge to his improving mood, but he was able to use the
571
treatment process to work through his disappointment and manage his mood following the
denial. Additionally, Mr. A and C reported multiple family stressors, including legal problems of other family members, family illness, and the limited access to see or talk to family members. The presence of ongoing life stressors of this nature potentially not only
impedes the progress of therapy, but also provides opportunities to test the capacity of the
resident to use skills taught in the treatment to improve mood.
A final complication that we encountered in this project was the low participation by
inmates identified as potentially eligible. The refusal rate for this project was not noticeably different than refusal rates we have encountered for depressed residents in nursing
homes outside of prison. However, despite the fact that the mental health staff at the facility used their own knowledge of the inmates to nominate them for participation, the
majority of inmates who consented to be screened did not meet criteria for major or
minor depressive episodes when interviewed with the SCID. This led us to wonder
whether there was a reluctance among the residents to admit to depression, particularly
to strangers. It is possible that, had the screenings been conducted with staff members
with whom inmates had already developed some form of relationship, we would have
identified more depression.
8 Follow-Up
Participants continued to be monitored by the prisons chief psychologist, with the following outcomes approximately 6 months after termination of therapy.
Mr. A
Unfortunately, Mr. As worries about dying in prison were borne out. Approximately 1
month after the completion of the program, Mr. A died as a result of complications following a fall. Mr. A had been medically unstable for some time. However, prior to his death,
Mr. As mood improved noticeably, he was happier, and he shared more. In addition, he
continued to participate in arts and crafts as well as bingo.
Mr. B
At the beginning of the program Mr. B only rarely left his room. Though he has not
regressed to that level, Mr. B continues to spend an excessive amount of time in his room
sleeping and staring at the television. His participation in group activities has declined but
he does attend bingo. Another previously identified pleasurable activity that he has maintained is taking regular showers. His church attendance and writing have declined though
not to preprogram levels. His affect remains primarily flat though he does occasionally
smile and his eye contact has improved from what it was at the beginning of the study. A
particular pleasurable activity for Mr. B was to go outside and observe nature.
Unfortunately, he has not been able to engage in this for some time because of a prolonged
period of inclement weather.
572
Mr. C
Mr. C continues to come to bingo and enjoys his books on tape. He has had some visits from
his brother which is another identified pleasurable event. He has maintained his previous level
of high activity and has added a job of wiping down the hand rails in the nursing care unit.
He has a roommate with whom he gets along and he continues to be social, visiting with other
inmates on a regular basis. Mr. C appears upbeat and describes his mood as good.
Mr. D
Mr. D has significantly decreased in cognitive functioning since the end of the program.
In addition, his health has declined. He spends most of his time in his room sleeping. He
now requires a wheel chair for ambulation. He continues to be disliked by staff and other
inmates and is now serving segregation time for displaying threatening behavior toward his
roommate. Despite this, Mr. D can respond pleasantly when treated with compassion.
573
part of BE-ACTIV and serves two purposes: (a) to ensure that pleasant events are implemented and (b) to provide the inmate with an ally whose function extends beyond mental
health care to enjoyment of day-to-day life. Furthermore, the alliance with a recreational therapist helps increase the likelihood that activities will be maintained once active mental health
treatment is ended, although we did not test this assumption in the present project.
Note
1. To protect the anonymity of the participants, inmates actual ages are not given in the case descriptions.
References
Aday, R. (1994). Golden years behind bars: Special programs and facilities for elderly inmates [Electronic version]. Federal Probation, 58(2), 47.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.).
Washington, DC: Author.
Baillargeon, J., Black, S. A., Contreras, S., Grady, J., & Pulvino, J. (2002). Anti-depressant prescribing patterns
among prison inmates with depressive disorders. U.S. Department of Justice Document #194054. Retrieved
January 16, 2008, from the National Criminal Justice Reference Service Web site: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/194054.pdf
Bender, E. (2005). Prison punishment exacerbates inmates psychiatric illness. Psychiatric News, 40, 15-16.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2003). Census of state and federal correctional facilities, 2000. Revised 2003.
Retrieved January 16, 2008, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/csfcf00.pdf
Brink, T. L., Yesavage, J. A., Owen, L., Heersema, P., Aey, M., & Rose, T. L. (1982). Screening tests for geriatric depression. Clinical Gerontologist, 1, 37-43.
Fazel, S., Hope, T., ODonnell, I., & Jacoby, R. (2001). Hidden psychiatric morbidity in elderly prisoners
[Electronic version]. British Journal of Psychiatry, 179, 535-539.
Fazel, S., Hope, T., ODonnell, I., & Jacoby, R. (2004). Unmet treatment needs of older prisoners: A primary
care survey. Age and Ageing, 33, 396-398.
Fazel, S., & Lubbe, S. (2005). Prevalence and characteristics of mental disorders in jails and prisons. Current
Opinion in Psychiatry, 18, 550-554.
First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (2002, November). Structured Clinical Interview
for DSM-IV-TR Axis I disorders, research version, patient edition (SCID-I/P). New York: Biometrics
Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute.
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading
the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatry Research, 12, 189-198.
Goetting, A. (1983). The elderly in prison. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 20, 291-309.
James, D. J., & Glaze, L. E. (2006). Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. U. S. Department of
Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ 213600, September. Retrieved January 16, 2008, from
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/mhppji.pdf
Konrad, N., Daigle, M. S., Daniel, A. E., Dear, G. E., Frottier. P., Hayes, L. M., et al. (2007). Preventing suicide in prisons, Part I. Recommendations from the International Association for Suicide Prevention Task
Force on Suicide in Prisons. Crisis, 28, 113-131.
Lawton, M. P. (1997). Positive and negative affective states among older people in long-term care. In R. L.
Rubinstein & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Depression in long-term and residential care (pp. 29-54). New York:
Springer.
Lawton, M. P., Kleban, M. H., Dean, J., Rajagopal, D., & Parmelee, P. A. (1992). The factorial generality of
brief positive and negative affect measures. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 47, 228-237.
574
Lewinsohn, P. M., Hoberman, H., Teri, L., & Hautzinger, M. (1985). An integrative theory of depression. In S. Reiss
& R. R. Bootzin (Eds.), Theoretical issues in behavior therapy (pp. 331-359). New York: Academic Press.
Meeks, S., & Burton, E. G. (2004). Nursing home staff characteristics and knowledge gain from a didactic
workshop on depression and behavior management. Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 25, 57-66.
Meeks, S., & Depp, C. A. (2002). Pleasant-events based behavioral intervention for depression in nursing home
residents: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Clinical Gerontologist, 25, 125-148.
Meeks, S., Heuerman, A., Ramsey, S., Welsh, D., & White, K. (2005, November). The Pleasant Events
ScaleNursing Home Version: Development and validation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the
Gerontological Society of America, Orlando, FL.
Meeks, S., Looney, S. W., Van Haitsma, K., & Teri, L. (2008). BE-ACTIV: A staff-assisted, behavioral intervention for depression in nursing homes. The Gerontologist, 48, 105-114.
Meeks, S., Teri, L., Van Haitsma, K., & Looney, S.W. (2006). Increasing pleasant events in the nursing home:
Collaborative behavioral treatment for depression. Clinical Case Studies, 5, 287-304.
Nelson, E. C., Wasson, J., Johnson, D. J., & Hays, R. D. (n.d.). Dartmouth COOP functional health assessment
charts: Brief measures for clinical practice. Retrieved June 16, 2005, from the Dartmouth University COOP
Project Web site: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~coopproj/more_charts.html
Nelson, E. C., Wasson, J., Kirk, J., Keller, A., Clark, D., Dietrich, A., et al. (1987). Assessment of function in
routine clinical practice: Description of the COOP chart method and preliminary findings. Journal of
Chronic Diseases, 40, 55S-63S.
National Institutes of Health. (2007). Re-engineering the clinical research enterprise. Retrieved January 9,
2008, from http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/clinicalresearch/overview-translational.asp
Pollock, P. H., Stowell-Smith, M., & Gpfert, M. (Eds.). (2006). Cognitive analytic therapy for offenders.
London: Routledge.
Saunders, J. W. (Ed.). (2001). Life within hidden worlds. Psychotherapy in prisons. London: Karnac Books.
Senior, J., Hayes, A. J., Pratt, D., Thomas, S. D., Fahy, T., Leese, M., et al. (2007). The identification and management of suicide risk in local prisons. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 18, 368-380.
Teri, L. (1994). Behavioral treatment of depression in patients with dementia. Alzheimers Disease and
Associated Disorders, 8, 66-74.
Teri, L. (1997). The relation between research on depression and a treatment program: One model. In R. L. Rubinstein
& M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Depression in long-term and residential care (pp. 129-153). New York: Springer.
Teri, L., Logsdon, R., & Uomoto, J. (1991). Treatment of depression in patients with Alzheimers disease.
Therapist Manual. Seattle: University of Washington School of Medicine.
Teri, L., Logsdon, R. G., Uomoto, J., & McCurry, S. M. (1997). Behavioral treatment of depression in dementia patients: A controlled clinical trial. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 52B, P159-P166.
Vernig, P. M. (2007). From science to practice: Bridging the gap with translational research. APS Observer, 20(2).
Retrieved January 19, 2008, from http://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/getArticle.cfm? id=2133
Suzanne Meeks, PhD, is a professor of clinical psychology in the Department of Psychological and Brain
Sciences at the University of Louisville. She has been involved in clinical work and research in nursing homes
for more than 20 years as part of her broader research focus on mental illness in late life.
Robin Sublett, PhD, is the chief psychologist at the Kentucky State Reformatory. She currently provides clinical services in the Nursing Care Facility as well as supervises the General Psychological Services.
Irene Kostiwa, MA, is a doctoral student in clinical psychology at the University of Louisville. Her research
interests include sleep and mood problems among long-term care residents.
James R. Rodgers, MA, is a doctoral student in clinical psychology at the University of Louisville, completing his internship at the Southwest Texas Veterans Health Center during the 2008-2009 academic year. His
research and clinical interests focus on end-of-life care.
Donna Haddix is a recreation leader at the Kentucky State Reformatory. She supervises recreation services in
the Correctional Psychiatric Unit as well as the Nursing Care Facility.