International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering Vol:6, No:11, 2012
k.d
's
's
s=fe/Es
fe
bu
k.d
's
's
I. INTRODUCTION
s>fe/Es
b
fc
d1
As'
h
d
As
b
Fig. 1 Rectangular beam section
s
fe
Es
s0
fe
bu=0.0035
0=0.002
International Science Index, Civil and Environmental Engineering Vol:6, No:11, 2012 waset.org/Publication/7612
if
0.002
0.0035
if0.002
(1)
(2)
971
scholar.waset.org/1999.3/7612
(3)
if
if
(12)
(13)
(5)
of the force
The moment
written as follow:
bs
(14)
bs
k.d
International Science Index, Civil and Environmental Engineering Vol:6, No:11, 2012 waset.org/Publication/7612
. if
. if
(4)
0and
(15)
. .
. . . .
(6)
. . .
. . .
(17)
(16)
Case where0
(7)
k.d
b=?
From expressions (6) and (7) are deduced for the particular
values
= 0.002.
- = 2/3 = 0.6666
- = 5/12 = 0.4166
0.0035
- = 17/21 = 0.8095
- = 143/147 = 0.9727
Knowing the tensile steels deformation s, the tension force
developed by them will be
s<fe/Es
As
if
(8)
(9)
of the force
The moment
written as follow:
if
(19)
The forces equilibrium gives:
. . . .
(10)
if
(20)
(21)
(11)
0, consequently:
972
scholar.waset.org/1999.3/7612
(22)
b)
Case where
. .
(29)
bu
Ku.d
. .
(30)
s=?
As
International Science Index, Civil and Environmental Engineering Vol:6, No:11, 2012 waset.org/Publication/7612
f /E such that
Knowing be corresponding to
, we assume a value of such that
. The
deformation of tension steel can be written as follow:
If
4. .
2. .
(31)
(32)
then:
(33)
. .
. .
(34)
(23)
We obtain:
Thus
. . . .
(35)
(24)
b)
. .
In case where
(25)
A's
A's
b=?
k.d
bu
Ku.d
's=?
's=?
s=?
As
s<fe/Es
As
with
(26)
. .
. .
(27)
With
- CASE 1:
The forces equilibrium can be written F
consequently we obtain:
. . . .
. .
.
.
(37)
,
Rearranging this expression (36) we obtain the following
second degree equation:
. .
(28)
(36)
. .
, the
. . . .
973
scholar.waset.org/1999.3/7612
0 (38)
4. .
. .
(39)
2. . .
.
CASE 2:
(40)
41
42
When the section of tensile steel reaches the elastic limit the
curvature of the section is:
/E
We obtain:
(43)
FE ES
CASE 3: S
(44)
International Science Index, Civil and Environmental Engineering Vol:6, No:11, 2012 waset.org/Publication/7612
. .
(45)
We obtain:
.
C. Resistant Moment
(46)
25
Me
0.01
0.02
25
20
fc28=40
15
10
'/
25
1
0,75
0,50
0.25
0
20
0.02
fc28=60
fc28=50
15
10
5
0.02
25
fc28=80
20
15
10
5
0.01
1
0,75
0,50
0.25
0
10
5
0
0.03
0.00
1
0,75
0,50
0.25
0
20
0.03
'/
15
25
0.02
0.02
fc28=70
20
0.01
0.02
fc28=90
1
0,75
0,50
0.25
0
15
10
5
0.03
0.03
'/
0.00
0.01
25
'/
0.00
0.01
0.03
0
0.00
0.03
1
0,75
0,50
0.25
0
10
1
0,75
0,50
0.25
0
Fig. 12 Variation of
0.02
15
'/
20
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
(47)
0.01
'/
0.01
25
Then:
0.00
5
0.00
(46)
0.03
1
0,75
0,50
0.25
0
10
0.00
'/
fc28=30
15
20
1
0,75
0,50
0.25
0
15
10
25
'/
fc28=20
20
0and
(50)
Mu
(49)
.
-
(48)
90
974
scholar.waset.org/1999.3/7612
International Science Index, Civil and Environmental Engineering Vol:6, No:11, 2012 waset.org/Publication/7612
25
25
20
20
15
10
5
50
60
70
80
15
fc
20
25
30
40
10
5
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.03
25
20
20
15
0.00
25
10
fc
20
25
30
40
50
60
70
80
50
60
70
80
15
fc
20
25
30
40
0.01
0
0,00
0,01
10
0
0.00
50
60
70
80
0.02
0.03
fc
20
25
30
40
0,02
0,03
25
20
15
10
50
60
70
80
fc
20
25
30
40
0.00
Fig. 13 Variation of
0.01
0.02
0.03
resistance
max 0.25
, 1.38
- For bent elements of structure located in seismic
zone.
0.5 .
- The section of tensile steels of the bent elements
belonging to ductile beam-column structures resistant
to seismic forces shall not exceed 2.5% of the section
of concrete.
0.025
975
scholar.waset.org/1999.3/7612
International Science Index, Civil and Environmental Engineering Vol:6, No:11, 2012 waset.org/Publication/7612
c)
-
0.5
- Along the entire length of the beam, the
reinforcement should satisfy the followings
conditions :
0.05
0.17
These recommendations ensure in an indirect way using the
condition of minimum reinforcement for concretes with
moderate resistance (
22
), in the case of the RPA
an average ductility of13, the ACI code ensures a ductility
12,5 whereas, lEC8 an average minimal ductility
of16,5.
The section of maximum reinforcement not to exceed
imposed by the RPA and ACI codes aim at ensuring a quasiidentical minimal ductility value about:
In the case: += 4%
- 2.5 for'/=0.5
- 4.2 for'/=0.75
In the case:+= 6%
- 2.5 for'/=0.5
- 4.2 for'/=0.75
On the other hand lEC8 aim at ensuring a higher ductility
about:
- 7.5 for'/=0.5
- 8.3 for'/=0.75
These results show that the maximum steel section tolerated
by the codes ACI and RPA reduced ductility considerably
comparatively with the EC8 code.
Researchers have agreed on a minimum and reasonable
ductility value what must develop the critical sections of a
structure known as ductile, conceived to resist the
seism effects; they suggest a minimal value who can vary
from 4 to 6, thus 2 to 3 times ductility necessary in the
structural design under static loads, Where it is permissible to
take 2.
<0.25b
0.25b<<0.5b
0.5b<<0.75b
0.75b<<b
With
if
if
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
VI. CONCLUSION
7
9 3.5
7 2
6 1
976
ACI 318. ACI 318. "Building code requirements for structural concrete".
2004.
EC8. Eurocode 8. Conception et dimensionnement des structures pour
leur rsistance aux sismes et document d'application nationale. s.l. :
Normalisation franaise, Decembre 2000.
RPA 99/V2003. RPA 99/V2003. "Rgles Parasismiques Algeriennes".
s.l. :Ministre de l'habitat D.T.R B.C 2-48, 2003.
J. G. MacGREGOR. Ductility of structural elements. [Handbook of
concrete engineering]. s.l. : Mac Graw Hill, 1974. pp. 229-247.
H. Nakamura, J. Niwa & T. Tanabe. An analytical evaluation of the
ductility of reinforced concrete members.s.l. : Earthquake engineering,
tenth world conference, 1992. pp. 4343-4348.
M. M. Ziara, D. Haldane, A. S. Kuttab. Fexural behavior of beams with
confinement.ACI structural journal. Jan-Feb 1995. pp. 103-114.
M. S. Al-Haddad. Curvature ductility of reinforced concrete beams
under low and high strain rates. ACI structural journal. Oct 1995. pp.
526-534.
R. Park& D. Ruitong. Ductility of doubly reinforced concrete beams
sections. ACI structural journal. March-April 1988. pp. 217-225.
Pfrang et al. Pfrang E.O., Siess C.P. and Sozen M.A. Juillet "LoadMoment-Curvature Characteristics of Reinforced Cconcrete Cross
Sections". s.l. : Journal of the American Concrete Institute, july 1964.
Vol. 61, 7.
scholar.waset.org/1999.3/7612