by
i\<1arch 1964
EDITORIAL BOARD
by
R. H. Brooks
and
A. T. Corey
KYDROLOOY PAPERS
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
March 1964
No.3
ABSTRACT
Following the Burdine approach. a theory is presented
that develops the functional relationships among saturation,
pressure difference , and the permeabUities of air and liquid
in terms of hydraulic properties of partially saturated porous
media. Procedures for determining these hydrauliC properties
from capillary pressure - de saturation curves are described.
Air a nd liquid permeabilities as a function of saturation and
capillary pressure are predicted from the experimentally determined hydraulic properties.
The theory also describes the requirements for Similitude between a.ny two flow systems in porous media occupied by
two immiscible fluid phases when the nonwetting phase is static
and the now of the wetting phase is described by Darcy's law.
The requirements for similitude are expressed in terms of the
hydraulic properties of porous media.
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Abstract . . . . . . .
11
Introduction
Background
,,
,
3
3
3
3
Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . .
Effective saturation as a function of capillary pressure
Pore-size distribution index. A
Bubbling pressure P
defined
b
Relative permeability as a function of A
Experimental Techniques . . .
6
6
9
II
II
Determination of P b and A . . . . . .
Air permeability as a function of capillary preaaure
Liquid permeability as, a function of capillary pressur e ,
Permeability a s a function of saturation
II
II
15
. Similitude Requirements
16
Richard's equation
RicHard's equation in te rms of scaled variables
Similitude crite ria
Model requirements .
16
16
16
17
SignUicance of Hysteresis.
18
. . . ... ..
References
Appendix I.
Appendix
n.
Appendix III.
Ui
'0
,."
"
Fipres
P age
3,
Diagram of now system and pressure control system for air permeability cell .
4,
1Z
1Z
13
14
19
1.
Z5
Z,
16
7,
8,
9.
Tables
3,
(Appendix nI) Data from LJquid Permeameter for Consolidated Rock Cores
4,
(Appendix
nil
iv
27
- Ke /K
Kx - The component of K in the x - direction--dimensions: Ll
mining
v - Volume--dimensions: Ll
w - A subscript meaning wetting phase. A ~uld that
wets the solid surtaces of the media. In an
air-water system, water is the wettine phase.
y - Specific weight of fluid--weight per unit volume of
fiuid--dimensions: FL- 3 .
IJ.
Denotes a difference.
"
n.
is given in Appendix
5e -
IJl
f1
Interfacial tension--dimenaioDs: FL -1
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
( I)
m which
q
is the component of volume flux in the
x- direction,x 'i is the specific weight of the fluid, ~
is the viscosity, t.h and bP are the difference in
elevation and pressure respectively over the distance
Lx In the x-direction, and Kx is the permeability
in the x-direction. The volume flux qx is the volume
evp
"
(Z)
t>.v fluid
bv pores
(3)
[.!..r +...!..]
" p gas - P liqui
.
d
r
1
(4)
tional relations hip among effective permeability, sat uration and capillary pressure is essential. This
paper develops these functional relationships using a
model of rroys media developed by investigators [ 3,
relative permeability,
the relation:
K rw
dS
1.SP'
,
(S-S)'
~
as
J: ,
1 /~ 1 , 1. e.
(5)
Se
~)Zfor
Pc?:.c
( 10)
P'
where c i8 some constant. For most porous media,
equation (10) is not strictly corr ect. The au thors
have plotted several hundred capillary pre ssure desat uration cu rves using data from consolidated rock
samples and found onl y a few samples in which the
linear r elationship was essentially true. However,
when Corey 's approximations were compared with experimental data of K rw and Se from some of
these same r ock samples, the comparison was favorable. Evidently , the relative permeabilitiea as a
I
I
(5)1
e
s.
dS
~~~~~ilo~h~~eott~~ :tp~l~~yS~~:~t;~~et~uc~::.ges
( 6)
dS
PJ
(7)
Krnw " (1
in the
( 11 )
For the details of the Burdine development leading up
to equations (6) and (7), the reader is referre d to
Appendix I. The ratio of integrals gIven in equations
(6) and (7) can be evaluated graphIcally or numerically.
It can also be evaluated analytically, if a suitable
algebraic expression for Se; f (Pc) can be written.
but for media with relatively uniform pores the exponent in equation (11) is much larger than 8 and theoretically could increase without bound. Evidently, permeability is a very sensitive function of capillary
pressure. Obviously. equation ( 11 ) cannot be valid
for all porous media because permeability and saturation are not unique fun ctions of capillary pressure, as
Corey's equations imply, but depend upon the size
and arrangement of the pores. Thus, a general rela tionship between saturation and capillary pressure is
needed that will apply to a wide range of media. Such
a relationship will allow equations (6) and (7) to be
integrated and provide general relationships among
the variables (permeability, saturation, and capillary
pres surd for both t he wetting and nonwetting phases.
If the relationships among the variables can be shown
to agree with experimental data, the Burdine approach
will be g r eatly strengthened. Also, permeability can
be predicted not only as a function of saturation but as
a function of capillary pressure as well.
Corey [5] found that for a large number of consolidated porous rock, the ratio of integrals on the
ri~ht of equations (6) and (7) is approximately equal to
Se and (I - Se)Z respectively. He t herefore proposed (as a convenient approximation) the equations;
S.
K
I
rnw "( I -S)'
e (I- Se )
(8)
(9)
The approximate equations of Corey have con siderable utilit y because the only parameter needed
THEORY
oc
5. (pP~)'
.,
where
....
f or
P 2:. P
c
( 16)
( 12:)
for Pc 2:. P b ,
Equations (12:) - ( 16) present the theory r egarding the interrelationships among the variables Pc'
Pcl'i , it is necessary to have precise capillary pres sure desaturation data such as that shown in figure I,
Also, the residual saturation Sr must be known to
compute Se'
is discussed in
b
more detail in the following sections. It should also
be recognized that values of S < Sr can exist but that
and the indicated integrations are performed, the relative permeability of the wetting phase becomes
2: + 3).
rw
(5 )
e
-x-- . (5 e )'
(t 3)
0'
rw
Pb) ,
Pc
" (-
!orP
( 14)
extrapolated,
where
11 "
z+
3).
and
I! (2
+3
).) / )..
finite saturation Sr
2+ ,
K
"( I - S ) l ( 1 - S - ' - )
rnw
e
e
(15)
(I) _ank
..
SofId
Ul ''''II_n'H lllial~r.
sa""' '''ft'
lEla ....
'-'ToIIe ... ,
Sill l<><I ..
(GL. No.3)
DIH....
s-_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'"
I
I
.,
"
,.,
,
Figure 1.
~,.-------~~~~~-------,
U)
v........oe
SOM
12) GIG.. B _
.,
l ' .11
.'
.'
(I)'~IH
(2)
M","""
'"
..~--------------~.,-----------"--.,~--------~~~
.'L
,
,.,
.., L,----"----------.o---------"---~.,""---------"
-"
OM
Figure Z.
OM
EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES
A pair of pressure control reservoirs con t rolled the liquid pressure in the medium . A flexible
plastic tube connected the top of the upper rese rvoir
to the outflow end of the horbontal measuring tube .
Another flexible plastic tube connected the bottom of
the upper reservoir to the bottom of the lower reservoir, the top of the lower reservoir being open to the
atmosphere. The liquid pressure in the medium was
decreased in increments by lowering the lower reservoir, the preS8UN! being measured with respect to
atmospheric pressure by the difference in liquid
elevations in the upper and lower reservoirs at equilibrium ' A correction was made for the capillarity of
the outflow measuring tube and for its poSition relative to the sample container.
Air outfI,
,..L
Soap film
oir _ flowmeter
-:"""--
L,-L.__-, r - - - - ,
Calibrated liquid
flo wmeter
"""=
_-
LIqui '
Pressure cont rol
r.. erlloirs
--
~-
Sleeve
nressure
Soil sample
i-Pi
:l!I-'
:I~
~! + 1
/
Tensiometer -
--.!
:::::::
Air pre ssure
Manometer
outflow barrie'
Air inflow
Pr.soturolor \
ReQU}a,a'-9
(
Camp' ....'
Coarse regulator
Figure 3.
T,a p "
-Sf--!
'-
""-
Fine '89u1o'o,
Diagram of flow system and pressure control system for air permeability cell.
'
,..----[jl
.
"
..:.,.
" :' .,
"
-;i1~~~I"~~~ji
., ;
---_. .,
__13
"
:I
SECTION
A-A
TOP VIEW
,,"
t:iR
,.
,.
..
I\ubber 51 .....
....
..
H.... 801.
1/4"-"'. l- I/'"
....
>
...
.:
".
,,
--t-t.----
u. .....
4-'/4"dio.
H.od PJ.o.,.
M&/IoOIIICUOr Tap
Uquld Ovttlow Top
I/ o" ,_-t/o'" a
N, T.
1/ .1" _
M.T.
C ........ \. Barrier
10 Air
I.'
"'"' ... u em.
IIn.tn.c JU".
' .I.m.OD.O.I",,,,
..oU. 0. em,
).nom 00
'.0 em.
o.e "''''
H,co .. ,ubi".
1),0 ........ , "
SO .. I
PluU<
PluU
,-,
,-,
S . ....
9t. .1 toJr det>l ..... ,UI ParI , I)
eo ....... l. ISow O,~)
bubblittc p ...........
..."'10<> ..
,,~
Seol
to .... ,. Ten,lom.tor
._,
' / I "- If NC
a .....
T ...lometu-llquld
"",now ......,.,bly
P_lc
... k."
...
... ..
...
... n,""
...
II/II" lD.
'{'''wall .
s/n" .... u
1" / '"
Sott RInI:
00.1 -'1'" tD
' /l~
J/ ,"ooo'/ t ' " waU
'J/' ~
Il l "
Moterlol
J'7/1 ~D.
Figure 4.
C~U
ORI",
FRONT VIEW
U~rH. .dPla!.
U.
,,
aiil'd
Sl . . . . P ... . . UN Tap
,.
".
51.!
No .."
Flbcc.l ....
/loOp''''
NOOp.,n,
P_lc (.<......ted to
Pt. ... 11)
!k..! t .....
4. Fragmented mixture--This medium was obtained by mixing aggregates created by crushing oven-dried clay and a consolidated sandstone with the volcanic sand. The aggregates
were crushed until all passed through a 1132:
sieve. This m aterial was created to simulate
a soil having a well aggregated stru cture with
secondary as well as primary poroSity. The
aggregates were much more stable, however,
than those found in ordinary soils.
5. Touchet silt loam- - This soil comes from the
Columbia River basin and was also supplied by
the Hanford Laboratory. It is extremely fine
textured in that it contains practically no
coarse sand, but it is somewhat unusual in
that it contains a smaller amount of clay than
would be expected in "such a fine-textured soil.
lt is, in fact, nearly pure silt mixed with some
extremely fine sand. It contains enough clay,
however, to create a structure with secondary
porosity.
In all cases the wetting fluid was a hydrocarbon liquid. and the nonwetting fluid was air. The
hydrocarbon was sele cte d instead of water primarily
because soil stru cture is much more stable in the
presence of the hydrocarbon than in the presence of
water . The hydrocarbon also has more conSistent
wetting properties, and its surface tension is not
changed as readily by contaminants. The relationship
between the capillary pressure head for water and oil
in a stable medium waS experimentally found to be
( 17)
wand
The unconsolidated media used in this investi galion consisted of materials having a structure relatively stable in the presence of the hydrocarbon liquid.
Although a large number of mate rials were investigated in preliminary stages of the investigation, a
complete set of data was obtained on only live of the
unconsolidated media. These media, however, represented a very wide range of hydraulic characteristics.
A desc ription of the live materials on which more or
less complete data we re obtained is as follows:
in this
rnw
way was that in the case of the unconsolidated media.
it was not practical to determine the actual maximum
I
I
air'permeahility. Knw'
tion oC
Sr
10
They could, of
The first step in checkin,g the theory repre sented by equations (13). (14), ( I ~). and (16) was t he
determination oC the parameters P and A Crom the
b
data shown in figu r e 1. The data were replotted as
figure Z in which Se is shown as a Cunction of P c/'l'
These curves were obtained after successive approxI mations of the residual saturation Sr as described
in Appendix n.
The negative of the slope 01 the straight line
portion of a curve , e. g those shown in figure Z, is
designated as ~ and is called the "pore-size distribution i ndex". The extrapolation of the straight Hne
to the ordinate representing Se . I. 0 gives the value
of the parameter P
which is called the "bubbling
b
pressure". This particular value of capillary pressure is called bubbling pressure because it was found
experimentally that for homogeneous and isotropic
media, it is very close to the capillary pressure at
which the first gas flow can be observed. The bubblirg
pressure apparently represents the smallest capillary
pressure at which a continuous gas phase exists. At
smaller values of Pc' the theory does not appear
to be valid for either the wetting or the nonwetting
permeabilities.
Having determined the parameters
and
b
A equation ( 16) was solved to obtain r elative perme abilities to air as a function of P c/'l . The solu-
b
For the conso lidat ed sandstone, t he agreement
with respect to both P and A is excellent 3S is
b
shown in curves 2 and 3 on figure 6b. The anisotropy
of Berea Sandstone has a less noticeable effect on
K rw than on Krnw '
tI) VolcOl'lic:
Sand
(4)
..
rouc~'1
Sill
(Gt , "'.o ~)
.,
tI )
r""",,"," "'i.h,..
W ...... Sando'"",
~
It,......
Son""_
,,, ,
.,
",
,.,
o L.--'---'---'---'-co;.~,--"---"---"---"--c,~.
Figu'r e 5.
,,
... ,e,----r-----------~
~ r-----------m-->",.
~~
, e,9
0.'
0)
II
(3)
11'"'"
.,
~~,
o,
", ., ,
~I3 , 1
,,'1'.'"
.,
OJ _oNe 9_
,._.t."
Mi......
ti l
1218...0 Saltlht.....
a-,
BI""_ ,_,_
I2)G.....
BIFI... 9.... IG.!. "'0.13)
(4I T'ouc,,", Sill L...",
.....
Fo."",'ion
IG,. Ho , !l
,.,
to,
000
.'l
, ,.
Figure 6.
".,,'"
7,5
!l. ...
T
--
'"
'"
. L.-""---------"--o,,~-----=~,.--A-_!,.
.L--"---"--"---c-co~,;--"--"-~""<O"~,"
"' r---~--------,
~ I~.
..""
:}0Jj
,,'
10
,.
..,,
.,
,
,.
""11",..11" ,. .. , ... ,
..'"
,.,
. L-~-"--~~-.~,._~~-"~~_t,.
Figure 7.
Theoretical curves and experimental data of nonwetting phase relative permeability as a function
or saturation for unconsolidated porous materials.
13
LO,------.-----------::I
"
OS
o
aereo Sandstone
0.5
S
1.0
lOr-'--------.-----~-n
(
(a . )
HYoiene
('W)
Sandston.
Figure 8,
0 .5
S
1.0
14
It is practically certain that boundary condi tions did affect the measurement of
Kw in the
column permeameters used for unconsolidated media.
This is evident because the value of
Kw was orten
Evidently. the K
curves are much less
rw
sensitive to this kind of anisotropy because the K
rw
curve is in reasonably c lose agreement with the
predicted curve.
in fact, zero at values of 5 corresponding to cap illary pressures much larger than the predicted
15
SIMILITUDE REQUIREMENTS
Miller and Miller {131 have described the requirements for similitude of isotropic porous systems
,
and time are
PbI-lIK'V l
Pc' Se'
as,
(ZZ)
"'_
where the dots deSignate scaled variables or operators with respect to, scaled variables.
An equation descrihing the flow and macroscopic distribution of the liquid is derived by combining Darcy1s law with the equation of continuity applicable to flow in porous media. The continuity equation is
(18)
where
'e
The effective
3. The functional relationships
(19)
{tal
Ko
sideration.
('0)
dard unit
Kr '
by the relation:
.,.(I-S,->'
amon~
mum) permeability K of the medium under consideration. Using the standard units as scaling factors,
equation (2:0) becomes
(ll)
where the dots after the divergence and gradient
operator symbols indicate that the operations are per formed with respect to scaled coordinate lengths.
terms of
'I L/P
5 and
Sr
rnw
17
Sr
SIGNIFICANCE OF HYSTERESIS
The preceding discussion has dealt almost entirely with systems in which it is assumed that the
saturation of the medium either remains constant or
decreases with time. Systems involving an increasing
liquid saturation are of equal engineering importance.
Unfortunately, the functional relationships among
Pc ' S , Krw ' and K rnw arc usually not the
same on a cycle of increasing S as on a cycle o(
decreasing S The reason (or this has been discussed by Miller and Miller { 13] .
A question that needs to be answered is whether the criteria of similitude suggested in the preceding section are sufficient when hysteresis may be
involved. In order to gain some insight into this problem, the authors made an investigation of K
as
rw
a function of Pc on the imbibition as well as the
drainage cycle. One o( the coauthor ' s students,
Larry G. King, has made many measurements of K
rw
as a function of Pc on the imbibition cycle for his
doctorate thesis r 10] which 1s concerned with imbibition. An example of his data is presented in figure 9.
3. The values of
Kew on the imbibition cycle
tend to approach a maximum of about 0.45 0.50 of that obtained when the medium is
vacuum saturated. At this state, the nonwetting phase is air, and it is apparently able to
diffuse away with time . The authors have observed a slow increase in Kew with time at
a constant value of
Pc' the rate of increase
being more rapid for fine material than for
sands. In time, the media become full saturated with liquid by imbibition.
rw
as a runc-
demonstrated.
18
1.0.,..0---0--->-<>-0'''''''\........,.--------------,
~~~.
,I
Loveland Fin. Sand
"'\
~,
15.0.
0..1 r-
0..0.1 --
0.00'1--
Figure 9.
10.
lao.
19
REFERENCES
1.
2.
1.
Bu r dine , N. T . , Relative permeability calcu lations from pore-size distribution data. Trans .
AIME, 1952.
4.
11.
lZ.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18 .
19 .
ZOo
7.
8.
9.
10.
zo
APPENDIX I
The Theoretical Basis for the Burdine Equations
The theory presented below is a variation of
theory published in petroleum engineering literature
[3, 5, 19, ZOj*. It is realized that most irrigation
and drainage engineers do not have easy access to
this literature. This synopsis is included here, ther e~
fore, for the convenience of the readers.
where r
(I)
rZr
ar
&8ra6
ax
ax~
d'
u J;
vp*
where
(8)
Similarly,
b'
u'" -T'4JvP.
(')
(9)
(3)
~tlP* . r~+c
'V
~[ifrlr~)]
(7)
VP
yp
e '
u.8iIt
Flow through a small diameter tube is considered first , For this geometry it is more conven ient to express the quantity v~y in cylindrical coordidinates, i. e . ,
(6)
The assumption is made that fluid compressibility and inertia are not significant factors affecting
the flow so that the equation of Navier-St okes reduces
to a statement that the gradient of piezometric pressure p. is balanced by the viscous drag. For a
Newtonian viscous fluid. this relations hip is given by
-oP'
( 10)
(4)
R'
u "-4.l tlP *
(5)
( II)
ZI
(I ')
is evidently, greatly
It Is reasonable to auppose that (from a hydrodynamic viewpoint) flow in a thin film is about as
different from now in a cIrcular tube as it is possible
to obtain. One might conclude, therefo re, that the
shape factor for irregular cross sections (e. g. the
pore space in a porous soUd) should be somewhere
between 2 and 3. This conclusion would not be valid,
however, U the cross section has an extreme "eccentricity". Consider, for example , a c r oss section as
shown in Figure 1. Note that the perimeter of the
vP'
=(]
Figure 1.
IVPI "FPt:)e
vP'
-y;-
If it is desi.red to determine
as a function r:I
the potential difference between the ends of a tortuous
tube and the direct distance between the two ends , the
tortuosity will have two effects. The first effect is
with respect to ii . It the direction between the two
ends o f the tube is defined as the x direction, then ii
varies from point to point because the direction of the
axiS of the tube varies, i. e., the component of velocity
in the x direction varies even ttlougtl the magnitude of
the velocity remains constant. U Iv l is the magnitude of the average tangential velodiY. the mean value
( 14)
(tS)
(:;:.r
Futhermore, the value of R Z for the nonwetting phase, on the other hand will increase as the
saturation increases. The relationShip between
Rl for the wetting phase and S can be deduced
from a curve of S as a function of Pc ; e. g. as
shown in figure I of the text.
The princi ple is based on the assumption that
a connected cross section of an irregular-shaped tube
can be regarded as . composed of a large number of
sub-sections each having a discrete R The values
of Rl of each sub -section are summed and the m ean
value of R! 1s obtained. The entire pore space filled
with the wetting phase is then regarded as a single
tube of irregular shape (but unilonn cross-sectional
area) having an average shape fa ctor k and mean
value of hydraulic radius ill .
Another key assumption of this theory is that
to a close a pproximation,
( 16)
by 1. 0 did not materially change the calculated per m eabilltics for saturatio ns less than Sc
of the desaturated area at the sail-wetting phase interfa ce, and 9 is the angle of contact of the wetting phase
a t the Bolid interface. It is further assumed that 9
and !1 remain constant over the range of s aturations
considered.
;S~ vP.
cos
q " kslT
;S
.Rl
w
ITlCOSZe
(s
dS
e nt oC S
as give n
equation
phase is
~ _ !11cosle l 1~
nw
1 -
R:7
Knw
(2:3)
. Assuming that
(S) and T w(S) are
by equat ions (18) and (ZO) respectively, the
for the relative perm eability of the wetting
given by
( 19)
P 1
S '
FV (S)
(18)
---s- Jof7
(2:2:)
( 17)
-r- .
(Z4)
(Z5)
Equations (Z4) and (ZS) are known as Burdine's equations for relative permeability.
In Burdine ' s equations , the parameters (T l ,
cos 20 , k ,and; cancel. It is possible thereCore ,
that the theory with respect to relative permeability
is more precise than with respect to perm eability,
per se.
( ZO)
nw
(2:1)
I -~
and K
whe re Sc is called the "critical saturation" .
At
23
cow
c urve s .
i
APPENDIX II
Method of Determining Residual Saturation
A second estimate of
it Is neceuary to plot
the relation
s-s
se ......--...!
1-;::'
for S r <
S -< 1.0
function of
Pc lv to determine
An approximate value of
(1)
S
as a
Sr'
P cfy
> Pb/ y
Sr is obtained by
is then obtained
r
Se' in the high capillary pres-
comes
5 , Se is very
5 r chosen, i. e . , a small
makes the change in 5
look big o n
e
5r
a t this end
a log - log plot. Therefore , values of 5
e
of the curve that do not lie exactly on the st raight Hne
should not be given much consideration in selecting a
value of 5 r .
1. 0
150
Computed values
ofSe USing~
Fine Sand
(GE '13)
140
5 r '" 0 .1 5
Fine Sand
(GE 113)
130
"0
110
O. 10
100
\ 0
\
\
90
,,
,,
,
80
70
60
2nd Estimate or
Sr obtained by
"
0.01
40
5 r t-S
30
10
Fig.
~
\
\"')
..\ T
I
"~
zo
s
.1. 2
.3
.4
. 5.6
10
.1
. 8.91.0
"
20
30 40
60 80 100 150
APPENDIX W
TABLE I
Dl!.ta from Air Pe rmeability Cell
for Uncon.olidated Sample.
' 0.3"
, 0, 371
Fraa:menled Mixture
(iranulated clay + fraimented
aandaton, + volcanic 'and)
0 0.443
Pb ' T ' 17. 2 e m,
Sr oO . I ' 7
Knw o Z,~,,'
Sr " 0.167
Sr O. Z76
~ o Z.Z9
A " 3. 7
.e 0. 314
A 0 2.89
'e
Volcanic Sand
Pe'T
6.9
9. ,
10. 5
1Z. 0
13. 5
14. 5
IS. ,
18.0
17.0
17.2
21.0
24.8
...
87.7
I lfi. 6
K rnw
Kenw
,,~
(em . )
1. 00
1. 00
1.00
0.990
0, 988
0. 98 0
0.97 4
0.948
0.895
0.875
0.838
0.479
0,277
0.188
0.158
0, 0 11 2
o, ono
0.123
2.10
5, 20
12. I
17, 0
17.8
Pe iT
0.00082
0, 0040
0,0068
0, 11 7
o. za9
0.6n
0.944
0, 990
12.8
Z7.8
30.8
31. 8
34. 8
36. 8
39.8
42 , 8
45,8
48 , 8
'2,8
57. 7
64. 8
7 1,7
74.4
92.1
150, I
Kenw
rnw
,,~
(em.)
0,990
0.980
0. 982
0.950
O,9l6
0, 90 1
0,85 5
0. 788
0.718
0,827
0.503
0,393
0.314
0,273
O,28Z
0.2 17
O, I H
O.OOZ34
0,00700
0.0 115
O,Ol98
0.0808
0. 150
0, l '9
0.486
0 , 886
t. 39
1.74
1, 8'
2.20
Z. 47
0.0009 35
0.00280
0,00480
0.0119
0.0 32
0.060
0,104
0, 194
0.354
0,556
0.696
0 , 735
0,880
0.989
0.3Z1
K
Kenw
,,~
(em.)
10. 9
13. 0
14. I
15.0
16,0
17. 0
18. 4
23.8
30. 5
37,7
53.7
Il,
C1.... Beada
("3M" f130'5005)
Pc ' "
0.991
0. 978
0,989
0.96Z
0.95 1
O,9l4
0.87 1
0, 562
0.415
0 , 348
0,303
O.OZ I
0. 173
3,14
6,56
8.90
10, 4
0.0018l
0.0 150
0.278
0.581
0,788
0.920
, " O. 370
, 0.485
0 0. 47
Sr 0.085
Sr 0 0,270
Knwo 30,01"
P ,,\, 10,3
b
Sr oO . 30
). 0 7. 3
f e o O,3 la
A' 1. 8Z
'e o O,349
A 0 1,92
'e' 0.ll9
Pe l '\'
' .9
11, 8
17. 8
Z3.8
Z6 . 9
".9
Z9.3
"
..
31. 0
ll. I
n .7
33.9
35.7
39.0
43.8
53.5
150.4
K rnw
,,~
(em . )
,.<
Kenw
J. 00
0, 995
0.989
0. 985
0.980
0.971
0.938
0. 91Z
0.764
0.681
0 . 579
0 .465
0.337
0,269
0. 190
0.130
0.099
0.097
O.Oll
0. 060
O. l09
0.352
0. 630
t. 140
2.0 3
2.79
4.0 9
5.24
6. 15
6.26
P,n
Kenw
,,~
(em,)
0.00352
0.009 50
0.0332
0.058
0.100
0.18 1
O. ]Zl
0.443
0.8 49
0.831
0.978
0. 995
l.9
n.8
17.8
ZZ.8
ll.8
42. 8
5l.8
62.8
67.8
n.5
77. 8
82. 3
87 .7
97.8
107.6
I ll.O
142.6
177.0
207.2
00
00
I. 00
1.00
0.998
0.995
0.992
0.984
0.978
0.967
0.948
0.892
0.821
0.7 19
0.841
0.552
0.49Z
0,424
0.383
..
I,
I,
0.041360
0.0069
0.0157
0.0506
0. 105
0. 185
0.264
0.359
0. 418
25
..
"
0.00060
0.00 11 5
0.0282
0. 0844
0. 175
0. 308
0.440
0.800
0.895
Pc'"
'.9
'.9
7, 6.
9. l
10.0
12. 4
15. 3
17.8
ZI. 5
25.6
za . 9
33.8
46.6
58.0
Kenw
K rnw
,,~
(em . )
1. 00
I. 00
0.9n
0.958
0,860
0. 776
0.663
0,554
0. 485
0,416
0.397
0.37 5
0. 339
0.331
0.0 144
0.600
3. zo
4.88
9. ZO
15.7
ZO,O
22.0
2]. "
Z5.4
27.0
0.000480
0. 02 00
0. 107
0,163
0. 365
0.52 3
0.867
O. H4
0.780
0.848
0.900
T AB LE l
Data from Uqllid Permeamete r Colu m n,
for Uneonaolidate d Samplea
Vole-ilie Sand
O. 365
Pb
I)
h ' I S. 8 em.
0. 360
~b/'!' 41. 0 em .
9. 0
" . 1-4. 6
Pel'!'
..
.. , ",
( em. )
11 .0
11 .0
10 . n
9. 75
5. 56
1.26
0.06 -4
0.00 545
0.0
11 .9
13. 3
18. 0
ZZ.2
29. 7
-40.0
(em.)
11.3
ll.O
25.2
1.00
I. 00
0.980
0.885
0.506
0. 114
0. 0058
O. OOOSO
n. 9
36. 9
4 1. 6
44 . 7
50. 9
5-4 . 9
" .l83
Pbh 29 em.
K " 10.5,,'
w
It' lO
(em . )
10. 7
16. -4
24.8
l8. I
29. 0
lO
lO. ,
31. 2
n .8
32.9
31. I
31. 2
"'.,
-4 2.6
-41.0
",
10. 4
10. 4
10.6
.. "
8.08
-4.60
2.61
I. -485
0.523
0.383
0.092 5
0. 051
0.0-42
0.0110
0.010-4
..
I. 00
t. 00
1.00
0.945
0.770
0. 4 51
O. Zli4
0. 1-41
0. 0498
0. 0)46
O. 0088
0. 005-4
0 . 00 40
0.00 18
0.0010
(em.)
4. 50
7.02
18. 10
31. -4
38.li
69.5
",
l.85
l.85
2.85
l . 85
2.6 l
2. 03
1. 075
O. l UI
0. 0434
I. 00
1.00
I. 00
I. 00
0. 92
0.7}i
.. ,
0.0-4 5
0.0 1S2
0.334
",
Z.20
Z. 11
1. 225
0. 142
0.1 30
0.0 1-4 5
0. 500 ,,1
Kw " 15.0,,'
" . 10 . 9
Pel'!'
'-'
10.2
Il.l
16.6
18.7
n .4
2-4 .3
24.2
27. 5
34. 2
K,.
",
I. 00
0. 993
0.983
0.9-46
0.786
o . t 04
0.048
0.045
O. Oi lS
0.00 121
I S. O
14. 9
14.75
1-4 . 2
11 .8
1. 56
0.721
0.672
0. 189
0. 01 91
Pe l '!'
",
6 . 10
S. lO
n.l
60.0
H . I
6 3. 9
9l.9
103. 7
124.-4
14 9. -4
Sand (C. E.
K
3. 05 ,, '
P e l '!'
(em . )
1. 00
0.96
0 . 5-44
O. 0645
0. 0590
0.007
K, .
1. 00
t .OO
O. &40
O. H8
0. 595
0.276
O. t18
0. 065
0.02.6
0.010
0.500
0. 497
0. -470
0 . 36 4
0.298
0.136
0.069
0.On5
0.01-4
0.0050
0.376
0.li03
Pb h" 20.5 em .
I) "
Pc ' '!'
K.
(em. )
("
7. 85
II. 3
13. 8
15. -4
17.7
n.2
27.2
31. 0
31.5
-43. 1
9.3
S
K. .
16. I
16. I
I S. S5
13. I
I I. 1
7.74
I. 68
O.ll
0.057
0.0 18 1
LO
0.967
0.815
0.128
0. 48
0. 104
O.O Zl
0 . 0036
O. DO H
0.358
0. 11 7
K..
" 5. 6
,m.
"l
Pb''!' 38 em.
" t. 48j.1l
Pb''!' 43 em.
" 10. I
" 10.0
(em.)
(em .)
It 3. II
P el y
K. .
. 4-4 1
Fraimcnl ed Mi xture
(granulated cl"y + fragme nted
sandatone + yoleanie s a nd)
Cia" Beada
("3M" ft30 li505)
Pe l '!'
Pd'
K,.
",
1-4.6
21.9
3.05
3.03
2.39
l8 .8
l . 1-4
37. I
42. 9
4 6.6
5 1. J
60. 5
I. 38 5
O. 763
0.430
0. 160
0. 0 3)4
Pc l y
(em.)
1. 000
0.993
0.18 4
0 . 105
0. -4 54
0.2 57
0. 14 1
0.0&25
0.0 1095
Z6
29.2
-43.6
52. -4
66 . Z
61.6
73.6
K. .
1. 480
1. 100
O. Zl8
0. 0 188
0. 0 18 4
0. 0072
1. 00
0. 74 3
0. 1-47
0. 0 1l7
0.0 12-4
0.00-49
",
TABLE 3
Data from Liquid Permeameter for
C ons olidated Rock Cores
Hygiene Sandstone from
Pierre formation
(No visible bedding planes)
Berea Sandstone
(Core perpendicular to bedding
planes)
t/I=0.206
, " 0.250
Kw " 0.481 /A 1
1'1 - 11 . 1
P el l'
1. 00
1. 00
O. 990
O. 985
O. 92:6
O. 778
O. 706
0. 476
0, 345
O. 313
- 0.178/A1
Pe h
cow
(/A 1)
(em . )
11.5
20. 5
31. 9
35 . 9
4 3.7
48.0
50 . 2:
62:. 4
88,4
116 . 9
K,w
1. 00
1. 00
0. 976
0.955
0.695
O. 197
0 . 0990
0.00930
13. 3
18.4
27.4
44.9
5 1. 3
54 . I
56 . 6
59. 3
62:. 1
67,7
75 , I
85 . 2:
100,6
rnw
(/A ~)
(em .)
0,484
0. 481
0.469
0,458
0, 333
0, 095
0,0475
0,00450
K,w
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
0.995
0.975
0.960
o. no
0,865
0. 817
0.756
0.690
0.643
0.604
O. 178
O. 178
0, 177
0. 175
O. 161
0. 135
0.0 950
0.047
0,026
0 . 0077
0,0020
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
0.985
0.904
0,814
0.530
O. 2:65
O. 144
0.043
0 . 0110
TABLE 4
Data fro m Air Permeameter for
Consolidated Rock Cores
Hygiene Sandstone from
Pie rr e Formation
(No visible be dding planes)
Berea Sandstone
(Co re eut perpendic ula r to
visible bedding planes)
j "' 0,2:06
Pb l \' "' 4 3 e m,
j a 0, 250
Pb / \' .. 54 em.
Sr = 0.299
Sr"0.577
A = 3, 69
'e 2 0.144
A " 4.17
Pc 1'1'
K rnw
0, 00
0. 687
0,663
0,64 3
0. 610
0. 556
0. 540
0, 513
0.473
0.434
0. 392
0. 350
0, 318
0. 244
0 175
0.496
0, 00190
0, 00352:
0. 00437
0. 0082:5
0,0284
0, 0407
O. 0648
O. 104
0.148
O. 2: 13
0.287
0.330
0,42:5
o 469
=0. 128/A1
, /v
1.42
0. 00545
0. 0101
0,012:6
0, 02 37
0.08 16
0. 117
0, 186
0,2:99
0.425
0.61 1
0. 82:5
0,948
1. 22
I 35
Z7
dry
57 . 0
57.8
59.0
62.0
64 . 4
67.5
70.8
75. 1
85. 2:
100.6
Kenw
Krnw
(j./Z)
(em.)
(/A 1)
(em. )
dry
51. 0
51,5
52.4
54.0
56.6
57.5
5 9. 3
62.5
67.5
74. 3
85.0
117.0
Kenw
nw
0. 000
0.90 5
0.890
0.86 5
0.813
0. 785
0.757
0.72:3
0.690
0.643
0. 604
O. 171
0. 00 126
0. 00300
0,00580
0,0150
0. 02:17
0. 02:94
0, 04 50
0, 0600
0,0820
O. 104
0. 0098 5
0.02:34
0.0453
O. 11 7
O. 169
0,230
O. 352
0.469
0, 640
0,813
Reforence:
Reference :
Reference:
Media"
No.2.
"A Resistance Thermometer for Transient Temperature Measurements, II by J. L. Chao and V. A. Sandborn, March 1964.
No.2.
IIMeasurement of Turbulence in Water by Electrokinetic Transducers, II by J. E . Cermak and L. V. Baldwin, April 1964 .