CONTENT
S.No.
Topic
Chapter 1
Company Profile
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Objectives
Chapter 4
Research Methodology
Chapter 5
Chapter 7
Suggestions
Chapter 8
Bibliography
Chapter 9
Annexure
PART 1
Introduction of Job Satisfaction
INTRODUCTION
Job satisfaction is not the same as motivation. It is more if an
attitude, an internal state of the person concerned. It could, for example, be associated with
a personal feeling of achievement.
Job satisfaction is an individuals emotional reaction to the job itself.
It is his attitude towards his job.
Definitions:
Job satisfaction does not seem to reduce absence, turnover and perhaps accident rates.
-Robert L. Kahn
Job satisfaction is a general attitude towards ones job: the difference between the
amount of reward workers receive and the amount they believe they should receive.
-P. Robbins
Job satisfaction defines as The amount of over all positive affect (or feeling) that
individuals have toward their jobs.
-Hugh J. Arnold and Daniel C. Feldman
Job satisfaction is the amount of pleasure or contentment associated with a job. If you
like your job intensely, you will experience high job satisfaction. If you dislike your job
intensely, you will experience job dissatisfaction.
By Andrew J DuBrins,
The practice of supervision, New Delhi
Job satisfaction is one part of life satisfaction. The environment influences the job.
Similarly, since a job is important part of life, job satisfaction influences ones general
life satisfaction. Manager may need to monitor not only the job and immediate work
environment but also their employees attitudes towards other part of life.
JOB
POLITICS
FAMILY
LIFE
LEISURE
Human life has become very complex and completed in now-a-days. In modern society
the needs and requirements of the people are ever increasing and ever changing. When
the people are ever increasing and ever changing, when the peoples needs are not fulfilled
they become dissatisfied. Dissatisfied people are likely to contribute very little for any
purpose. Job satisfaction of industrial workers us very important for the industry to
Mukesh Kumar Vishwakarma MBA (HRD) A.P.S.University Rewa (M.P.)
function successfully. Apart from managerial and technical aspects, employers can be
considered as backbone of any industrial development. To utilize their contribution they
should be provided with good working conditions to boost their job satisfaction. Any
business can achieve success and peace only when the problem of satisfaction and
dissatisfaction of workers are felt understood and solved, problem of efficiency
absenteeism
and dealing with them scientific investigation serves the purpose to solve the human
problems in the industry.
a) Pay.
b) The work itself.
c) Promotion
d) The work group.
e) Working condition.
f) Supervision.
PAY
Wages do play a significant role in determining of satisfaction. Pay is instrumental in
fulfilling so many needs. Money facilities the obtaining of food, shelter, and clothing and
provides the means to enjoy valued leisure interest outside of work. More over, pay can
serve as symbol of achievement and a source of recognition. Employees often see pay as
a reflection of organization. Fringe benefits have not been found to have strong influence
on job satisfaction as direct wages.
and fatigue. Jobs with too much variety and stimulation cause workers to feel
psychologically stressed and burnout.
PROMOTION
Promotional opportunities have a moderate impact on job satisfaction. A promotion to a
higher level in an organization typically involves positive changes I supervision, job
content and pay. Jobs that are at the higher level of an organization usually provide
workers with more freedom, more challenging work assignments and high salary.
SUPERVISION
Two dimensions of supervisor style:
1. Employee centered or consideration supervisors who establish a supportive personal
relationship with subordinates and take a personal interest in them.
2. The other dimension of supervisory style influence participation in decision making,
employee who participates in decision that affect their job, display a much higher level of
satisfaction with supervisor an the overall work situation.
WORK GROUP
Having friendly and co-operative co-workers is a modest source of job satisfaction to
individual employees. The working groups also serve as a social support system of
employees. People often used their co-workers as sounding board for their problem of as
a source of comfort.
WORK CONDITION
The employees desire good working condition because they lead to greater physical
comfort. The working conditions are important to employees because they can influence
life outside of work. If people are require to work long hours and / or overtime, they will
have very little felt for their families, friends and recreation outside work.
While analyzing the various determinants of job satisfaction, we have to keep in mind
that: all individuals do no derive the same degree of satisfaction though they perform the
same job in the same job environment and at the same time. Therefore, it appears that
besides the nature of job and job environment, there are individual variables which affect
job satisfaction. Thus, all those factors which provide a fit among individual variables,
nature of job, and situational variables determine the degree of job satisfaction. Let us see
what these factors are.
Individual factors:
Individuals have certain expectations from their jobs. If their expectations are met from
the jobs, they feel satisfied. These expectations are based on an individuals level of
education, age and other factors.
Level of education:
Level of education of an individual is a factor which determines the degree of job
satisfaction. For example, several studies have found negative correlation between the
level of education, particularly higher level of education, and job satisfaction. The
possible reason for this phenomenon may be that highly educated persons have very high
expectations from their jobs which remain unsatisfied. In their case, Peters principle
which suggests that every individual tries to reach his level of incompetence, applies
more quickly.
Age:
Individuals experience different degree of job satisfaction at different stages of their life.
Job satisfaction is high at the initial stage, gets gradually reduced, starts rising upto
certain stage, and finally dips to a low degree. The possible reasons for this phenomenon
are like this. When individuals join an organization, they may have some unrealistic
assumptions about what they are going to drive from their work. These assumptions make
them more satisfied. However, when these assumptions fall short of reality, job
satisfaction goes down. It starts rising again as the people start to assess the jobs in right
perspective and correct their assumptions. At the last, particularly at the fag end of the
career, job satisfaction goes down because of fear of retirement and future outcome.
Other factors:
Besides the above two factors, there are other individual factors which affect job
satisfaction. If an individual does not have favourable social and family life, he may not
feel happy at the workplace. Similarly, other personal problems associated with him may
affect his level of job satisfaction. Personal problems associated with him may affect his
level of job satisfaction.
Nature of job:
Nature of job determines job satisfaction which is in the form of occupation level and job
content.
Occupation level:
Higher level jobs provide more satisfaction as compared to lower levels. This happens
because high level jobs carry prestige and status in the society which itself becomes
source of satisfaction for the job holders.
For example, professionals derive more satisfaction as compared to salaried people:
factory workers are least satisfied.
Job content:
Job content refers to the intrinsic value of the job which depends on the requirement of
skills for performing it, and the degree of responsibility and growth it offers. A higher
content of these factors provides higher satisfaction. For example, a routine and repetitive
lesser satisfaction; the degree of satisfaction progressively increases in job rotation, job
enlargement, and job enrichment.
Situational variables:
Situational variables related to job satisfaction lie in organizational context formal and
informal. Formal organization emerges out of the interaction of individuals in the
organization. Some of the important factors which affect job important factors which
affect job satisfaction are given below:
1. Working conditions:
Working conditions, particularly physical work environment, like conditions of
workplace and associated facilities for performing the job determine job satisfaction.
These work in two ways. First, these provide means job performance. Second, provision
of these conditions affects the individuals perception about the organization. If these
factors are favourable, individuals experience higher level of job satisfaction.
2. Supervision:
The type of supervision affects job satisfaction as in each type of supervision; the degree
of importance attached to individuals varies. In employee-oriented supervision, there is
more concern for people which is perceived favourably by them and provides them more
satisfaction. In job oriented supervision, there is more emphasis on the performance of
the job and people become secondary. This situation decreases job satisfaction
.
3. Equitable rewards:
The type of linkage that is provided between job performance and rewards determines the
degree of job satisfaction. If the reward is perceived to be based on the job performance
and equitable, it offers higher satisfaction. If the reward is perceived to be based on
considerations other than the job performance, it affects job satisfaction adversely.
4. Opportunity:
It is true that individuals seek satisfaction in their jobs in the context of job nature and
work environment by they also attach importance to opportunities for promotion that
these job offer. If the present job offers opportunity of promotion is lacking, it reduces
satisfaction.
10
1. Work group: Individuals work in group either created formally of they develop on
their own to seek emotional satisfaction at the workplace. To the extent such
groups are cohesive; the degree of satisfaction is high. If the group is not
cohesive, job satisfaction is low. In a cohesive group, people derive satisfaction
out of their interpersonal interaction and workplace becomes satisfying leading to
job satisfaction.
Productivity:
There are two views about the relationship between job satisfaction and
productivity
1. A happy worker is a productive worker,
2. A happy worker is not necessarily a productive worker.
11
The first view establishes a direct cause-effect relationship between job satisfaction and
productivity; when job satisfaction increases, productivity increases; when satisfaction
decreases, productivity decreases. The basic logic behind this is that a happy worker will
put more efforts for job performance. However, this may not be true in all cases.
For example, a worker having low expectations from his jobs may feel satisfied but he
may not put his efforts more vigorously because of his low expectations from the job.
Therefore, this view does not explain fully the complex relationship between job
satisfaction and productivity.
The another view: That is a satisfied worker is not necessarily a productive worker
explains the relationship between job satisfaction and productivity. Various research
studies also support this view.
This relationship may be explained in terms of the operation of two factors: effect of job
performance on satisfaction and organizational expectations from individuals for job
performance. 1. Job performance leads to job satisfaction and not the other way round.
The basic factor for this phenomenon is the rewards (a source of satisfaction) attached
with performance. There are two types of rewardsintrinsic and extrinsic. The intrinsic
reward stems from the job itself which may be in the form of growth potential,
challenging job, etc. The satisfaction on such a type of reward may help to increase
productivity. The extrinsic reward is subject to control by management such as salary,
bonus, etc. Any increase in these factors does not hep to increase productivity though
these factors increase job satisfaction.
1. A happy worker does not necessarily contribute to higher productivity because
he has to operate under certain technological constraints and, therefore, he cannot
go beyond certain output. Further, this constraint affects the managements
expectations from the individual in the form of lower output. Thus, the work
situation is pegged to minimally acceptable level of performance. However, it
does not mean that the job satisfaction has no impact o productivity. A satisfied
12
Extrinsic
reward
Perceived equity
of rewards
Performanc
e
Intrinsic
reward
Satisfaction
Absenteeism:
Absenteeism refers to the frequency of absence of job holder from the
workplace either unexcused absence due to some avoidable reasons or long absence due
to some unavoidable reasons. It is the former type of absence which is a matter of
concern. This absence is due to lack of satisfaction from the job which produces a lack
of will to work and alienate a worker form work as for as possible. Thus, job satisfaction
is related to absenteeism.
13
HIGH
TURNOVER
JOB
SATISFACTION
ABSENCES
LOW
LOW
HIGH
Employee turnover:
Turnover of employees is the rate at which employees leave the organization within a
given period of time. When an individual feels dissatisfaction in the organization, he tries
to overcome this through the various ways of defense mechanism. If he is not able to do
so, he opts to leave the organization. Thus, in general case, employee turnover is related
to job satisfaction. However, job satisfaction is not the only cause of employee turnover,
the other cause being better opportunity elsewhere.
For example, in the present context, the rate of turnover of computer software
professionals is very high in India. However, these professionals leave their organizations
Mukesh Kumar Vishwakarma MBA (HRD) A.P.S.University Rewa (M.P.)
14
not simply because they are not satisfied but because of the opportunities offered from
other sources particularly from foreign companies located abroad.
15
DIMENSIONS
INDIVIDUAL
SOCIAL
FACTORS
ORGANIZATIONAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
FACTOR
FACTOR
CULTURAL
FACTOR
influences.
Cultural factors:-Attitudes, beliefs and values.
16
These factors affect job satisfaction of certain individuals in a given set of circumstances
but not necessarily in others. Some workers may be satisfied with certain aspects of their
work and dissatisfied with other aspects .Thus, overall degree of job satisfaction may
differ from person to person.
17
5. Job satisfaction surveys are useful for identifying problem that may arise,
comparing the response to several alternatives and encouraging manager to
modify their original plans. Follow up surveys allows management to evaluate the
actual response to a change and study its success or failure.
18
No wonder Andrew Carnegie is quoted as saying: "Take away my people, but leave my
factories, and soon grass will grow on the factory floors. Take away my factories, but leave my
people, and soon we will have a new and better factory"
SATISFIED EMPLOYEE
19
Interesting work that offers variety and challenge and allows the worker opportunities
to "put his or her signature" on the finished product
Up-to-date technology
20
For example, a person who does not pay attention to detail would hardly make a good inspector,
and a shy worker is unlikely to be a good salesperson. As much as possible, managers should
match job tasks to employees' personalities.
Managers who are serious about the job satisfaction of workers can also take other deliberate
steps to create a stimulating work environment. One such step is job enrichment. Job enrichment
is a deliberate upgrading of responsibility, scope, and challenge in the work itself. Job
enrichment usually includes increased responsibility, recognition, and opportunities for growth,
learning, and achievement. Large companies that have used job-enrichment programs to increase
employee motivation and job satisfaction.
Good management has the potential for creating high morale, high productivity, and a sense of
purpose and meaning for the organization and its employees. Empirical findings show that job
characteristics such as pay, promotional opportunity, task clarity and significance, and skills
utilization, as well as organizational characteristics such as commitment and relationship with
supervisors and co-workers, have significant effects on job satisfaction. These job characteristics
can be carefully managed to enhance job satisfaction.
Of course, a worker who takes some responsibility for his or her job satisfaction will probably
find many more satisfying elements in the work environment. Everett (1995) suggests that
employees ask themselves the following questions:
What did I learn from that experience that could be applied to the present situation?
21
22
23
24
25
Affect Theory
Edwin A. Lockes Range of Affect Theory (1976) is arguably the most famous job
satisfaction model. The main premise of this theory is that satisfaction is determined by a
discrepancy between what one wants in a job and what one has in a job. Further, the
theory states that how much one values a given facet of work (e.g. the degree of
autonomy in a position) moderates how satisfied/dissatisfied one becomes when
expectations are/arent met. When a person values a particular facet of a job, his
satisfaction is more greatly impacted both positively (when expectations are met) and
negatively (when expectations are not met), compared to one who doesnt value that
facet. To illustrate, if Employee A values autonomy in the workplace and Employee B is
indifferent about autonomy, then Employee A would be more satisfied in a position that
offers a high degree of autonomy and less satisfied in a position with little or no
autonomy compared to Employee B. This theory also states that too much of a particular
facet will produce stronger feelings of dissatisfaction the more a worker values that facet.
Dispositional Theory
Another well-known job satisfaction theory is the Dispositional Theory ]. It is a very
general theory that suggests that people have innate dispositions that cause them to have
tendencies toward a certain level of satisfaction, regardless of ones job. This approach
became a notable explanation of job satisfaction in light of evidence that job satisfaction
tends to be stable over time and across careers and jobs. Research also indicates that
identical twins have similar levels of job satisfaction.
A significant model that narrowed the scope of the Dispositional Theory was the Core
Self-evaluations Model, proposed by Timothy A. Judge in 1998. Judge argued that there
26
are four Core Self-evaluations that determine ones disposition towards job satisfaction:
self-esteem, general self-efficacy, locus of control, and neuroticism. This model states
that higher levels of self-esteem (the value one places on his/her self) and general selfefficacy (the belief in ones own competence) lead to higher work satisfaction. Having an
internallocus of control (believing one has control over her\his own life, as opposed to
outside forces having control) leads to higher job satisfaction. Finally, lower levels of
neuroticism lead to higher job satisfaction[].
27
28
29
30
INDUSTRIAL PROFILE
HISTORY OF POWER SECTOR DEVELOPMENT IN INDIA
Power Development :
The electric power generation in India on a commercial basis is almost a century old,
substantial power development efforts began only after independence. At the launch of
the First Five Year plan in 1951, power generation was recognized as a major input for
the countrys economic development and was accorded high priority. Power sector
outlays have among the highest in successive Five Year Plans ever since. The two plans
focused on hydropower (as component of multi-purpose projects). Subsequent plans
emphasized on rapid installations of thermal power stations. As a result of plan efforts,
Indias installed power generation capacity grew to 16,664 MW in 1974. However,
assessment of the planned growth since 1951 indicated that with the uneven distribution
of resources, power development with only states as spatial units would and greater
capacity addition, led the Government Of India to assume a leading role in large-scale
power generation as a matter of policy and, through an amendment of the Electricity
(Supply) Act, National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. (NTPC) and National
Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd. (NHPC) were set in the central sector to
supplement the efforts of the states. Consequently, total installed capacity of power
utilities has increased from 1,362 MW in 1947 to
Electricity generation, which was only about 4.1 billion units in 1947, has risen to 515
billion units in 2001-02. As on March 2002, the total installed capacity of utilities stood
at 104918 MW. Most of this installed capacity is under government control nearly 60%
of the power generation capacity. Currently, the central government owns about 30% of
the power generation capacity in the country, the majority of which is in the thermal
sector. Of the total installed thermal capacity of 25366.50MW in central sector, NTPCs
share is 20092MW (76.61%).
31
COMPANY PROFILE
STRATEGIC INITIATIVES:
NTPC has acquired 44.6% equity stake in Transformers & Electrical Kerala Ltd. (TELK)
for manufacturing of Transformers. As part of globalization initiatives, NTPC plans to
construct and operate thermal power plants in overseas market. NTPC has signed an MOU
with Nigeria for supply of LNG. NTPC in turn shall set & operate 500 MW coal based and
700 MW gas based power plant in Nigeria. The company has also signed an MOU for
setting up of a 500 MW coal based power plant in SriLanka.
32
subsidiary
company to take up power distribution activities. NESCL has started the process
of implementation of Accelerated Rural Electrification Programme in West
Bengal.
NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Ltd. has been formed as a subsidiary company for
power trading. NVVN transacted business of 2664 MUs in 2006-07.
Entered the coal mining business and has been allotted 8 coal mining blocks.
33
NTPC has got the approval for Mining Plan of 15 MTPA for its first coal mining
project at Pakri Barwadih. It is the largest ever capacity planned, in the very first
phase, in a single mine in the country.
NTPC has also signed a MOU with CIL and SCCL for formation of Joint
Ventures to undertake development, Operation & Maintenance of coal blocks and
integrated coal-based power plants.
MOU signed with BEML for joint business development in the field of
contractcoal mining.
Consortium comprising NTPC, Canoro and Geopetrol has been allotted an oil
exploration block in Arunachal Pradesh.
MOU signed with Ministry of Railway for setting up power plant of 1000 MW at
Nabinagar in Bihar. Project approved by CCEA.
MOU signed with ADB for establishment of power generation of about 500 MW
through Renewable Energy Sources.
MOU signed with BHEL for taking up EPC jobs together.
34
NTPC has been giving increased thrust to hydro development for a balanced
portfolio for long term sustainability, 1920 MW under implementation at Koldam
(800 MW), Loharinag Pala (600 MW) and Tapovan Vishnugad (520 MW).
NTPC Hydro Ltd. Incorporated as a subsidiary company to take up small hydro
projects. Presently the projects planned for implementation are Lata Tapovan(171
MW), Uttarakhand & Rammam III (120 MW), West Bengal.
MOU signed with Arunachal Pradesh for implementation of two Hydro Projects
Etalin (4000 MW) and Attunli (500 MW).
35
Social
36
37
NTPC/VSTPS Vindhyachal Super Thermal Power Station is the largest power plant
of the India. It installed in three stages. Stage-I have six units. Each unit has capacity of
210MW. Stage-II&III have two units of 500 MW. So total capacity of the ten units is
3260MW stage-I is installed with the help of USSR engineers and machinery but stageII& III are installed by Indian machines of BHEL,L&T,CG,ABB etc. details of this
project is given below in table:
Project name:
Address:
P.O.vindhyanagar-486585,
Distt. Singrauli, Madhya Pradesh
Approved capacity:
Coal source:
Water source:
Beneficiary States:
38
Approved investment:
Unit I
Unit III
Unit Commissioned
Unit VI
USSR-stage-I
World Bank under Time Slice Loan Stage-II
39
BENEFICIAL STATES
Mukesh Kumar Vishwakarma MBA (HRD) A.P.S.University Rewa (M.P.)
40
1. Madhya Pradesh
2. Chhattisgarh
3. Maharastra
4. Gujarat
5. Daman & Div and Dader & Nagerhaveli
Power allocation:
Madhya Pradesh
23.1%,
Chattisgarh
4.2%,
Maharashtra
31.9%,
Gujrat
23.9%,
1.9%
Unallocated
15%
COAL SOURCE
Northern coal field ltd. (NCL) mines
Project
Distance
Dudhichua
7KM
Nigahi
10KM
Jayant
5KM
41
NTPC MISSION
NTPC VISION
42
VINDHYACHAL VISION
To be one of the largest, best and most
efficient Power Station of India
43
CORE VALUE
Business Ethics
Customer Focus
Organizational & Professional
Pride
o Mutual Respect and Trust
Innovation and Speed
Total Quality for
Excellence
NTPC OBJECTIVES
commercial utility
practice.
4. To develop appropriate commercial policy leading to
minimum receivables.
5. To function as a responsible corporate citizen and discharge social responsibility, in
respect of environment protection and rehabilitation.
Mukesh Kumar Vishwakarma MBA (HRD) A.P.S.University Rewa (M.P.)
44
The corporation will strive to utilize the ash produced at its stations to the
maximum extent possible through production of ash bricks buildings materials
etc.
To adopt appropriate human resources development policy leading to creation of
team of motivated and competent power professionals.
To introduce, assimilate and attain self-sufficiency in technology,
acquire
45
46
and now encompasses Computer Science, Chemistry, HR and Finance disciplines also.
Besides a comprehensive one-year training comprising theoretical inputs as well as on
the- job training, the new circuits are attached with Senior Executives under a systematic
and formal Mentoring System of the company to integrate them into the culture of
company. As part of the post employment training and development opportunities, a
systematic training plan has been formulated for ensuring minimum seven man days
training per employee per year and includes level-wise planned intervention designed to
groom people for assuming positions of higher responsibility, as well as specific needs
based interventions based on Scientific Training Needs Analysis. NTPC has created 15
project-training centers, 2 simulator training centers and an apex institute namely Power
Management Institute (PMI). While the project training centers(Employee Development
Centers) have specialized in imparting technical skills and knowledge, PMI places
emphasis on management development. Besides opportunities for long term education
are also provided through tie-ups with reputed institutions like IIT Delhi, (M.Tech in
Power Generation Technology), MDI Gurgaon (Executive MBA programmes), BITS
Pilani (B.Tech) etc. in order to realize the HR vision of making NTPC a learning
organization by providing opportunities to continually learn new capabilities a number of
initiatives have been taken. NTPC open competition for Executives Talent (NOCET) is
organized every year in which teams of executives compete annually through oral and
written presentation on a topical theme. Similarly Professional Circle has been formed
department wise where Executives of the department meet every fortnight to share their
knowledge and experiences and discuss topical issues. In order to tap the latent talent
among non- executives and make use of theyre potential for creativity and innovation,
Quality Circles have been set up in various units/ offices in NTPC. Besides a
management journal called Horizon is published quarterly to enable the employees to
share their ideas and experiences across the organization. Demonstrating its high concern
for people, NTPC has developed strong employee welfare, health &wellbeing and social
security systems leading to high level of commitment. NTPC offers best quality of life
through beautiful township with all amenities such as educational, medical and
recreational opportunities for employees and their family members. The motivational to
47
perform and excel is further enhanced through a comprehensive NTPC Rewards and
Recognition System. In order to institutional a strong culture based on values a number of
initiatives are taken to actualize the vision and core values (B-COMIT) across the
company. A culture of celebrating achievements and a strong focus on performance are a
way of life in a NTPC. NTPC has institutionalized Development Centers in the
company to systematically diagnose the current and potential competency requirements
of the employees with the objective of enhancing their development in a planned manner.
These centers give a good insight to the employees about their strengths and weakness,
the gaps in their competencies, which they can bridge through suitable support from
company. Due to innovative people management practices there is a high level of pride
and commitment amongst employees as reflected in the Best Employees in India-2003
survey by Hewitt Associates in which NTPC bagged coveted third rank. Further
continuous efforts are being made by HR function to leverage the potential of its
employees and become a strategic business partner.
HR FUNCTIONS AT NTPC
The entire gamut of functions relating to HR in NTPC has been organized under three
levels, viz. Corporate, Regional and Project levels. The responsibilities vary from level to
level depending on the tasks assigned, accountability and implementation criteria. An
overview of these functions is hereby given in this section.
48
Performance
Appraisal
System
and
Employee
Development
(i) Employee Services
(j) Corporate Office administration
(k) Public Relations.
scheme,
computerization,
job
preparation
evaluation
of
and
personal
data
development
bank
and
of
job
49
50
The responsibility of this function spans the various activities relating to the
representation of the organization in various cases in the labour and other
courts on land acquisition, labour dispute cases etc,.
(g) Corporate Social Responsibility:
This cell looks after various activities, which are related to the development
of society as a whole. Resettlement and rehabilitation of land ousties,
community
development
activities
in
nearby
villages,
providing
infrastructure like that for schools, primary health etc., planting trees etc.
One of the major contributions of this section is the plantation of about 14
lakhs trees across the nation.
The obligation to consult with its staff and their representatives to implement
policies and procedures developed as a result of discussions.
51
E-Mail Policy
NTPCs EOP & communication department is making every effort to provide its
employees with best technology available to conduct the companys official business. In
this regard the company has installed, equipments, computers and advanced
52
technological systems such as E-mail for use to conduct its official business. This
document was created to advise all users regarding the access to and the use of the
internet and other computer systems. For purposes of these policies and guidelines the
information system so not include those standalone computer systems designed to be
confidential, so long as they are not put on the LAN/Internet or web. There is no
expectation of personal privacy on the use of the internet and E-mail.
AN OVERVIEW
Project
NTPC OWNED
COAL
GAS/LIQ.FUEL
TOTAL
OWNED BY JVs
COAL
GAS/LIQ.FUEL
GRAND
No of
projects
Commissioned
capacity
(MW)
15
07
22
22,895
3,955
26,850
03
01
26
314*
740**
27,904
TOTAL
*captive power plant under JVs with SAIL
** power plant under JV with GAIL,FLs&
Mukesh Kumar Vishwakarma MBA (HRD) A.P.S.University Rewa (M.P.)
53
MSEB
PROJECT PROFILE
Coal based power stations
Coal based
1. Singrauli
Korba
2.
3. Ramagunda
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
m
Farakka
Vindhyachal
Rihand
Kahalgaon
Ntcpp
State
Uttar Pradesh
Chattisgarh
Andhara
Pradesh
West Bengal
Madhya Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Bihar
Uttar Pradesh
Commissioned
Capacity
(MW)
2,000
2,100
2,600
1,600
3,260
2,000
1,340
840
54
Coal/hydro
State
Fuel
1.
Kahalgaon stage II
Bihar
Coal
Additional
capacity under
implementation
(MW)
500
2.
Coal
500
1980
3.
4.
(stage II)
Barh
Bhilai (exp.power
Bihar
Chattisgarh
Coal
Coal
500
1980
500
5.
6.
7.
8.
Chattisgarh
West Bengal
Uttar Pradesh
Andhara
Coal
Coal
Coal
Coal
500
500
980
1000
9.
(stageII)
Koldam (HEPP)
Pradesh
Himachal
hydro
800
Pradesh
Uttarakhand
Uttrakhand
hydro
hydro
600
520
Chattisgarh
vishungad(HEPP)
Total (coal +hydro)
10,860
55
PART -3
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
OBJECTIVES
56
The objective of the study is to find out the satisfaction level of employee in NTPC
Vindhyachal.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
57
DATA COLLECTION
For any study there must be data for analysis purpose. Without data there is
no means of study. Data collection plays an important role in any study. It can be
collected from various sources. I have collected the data from two sources which
are given below:
1.
Primary Data
Personal Investigation
Observation Method
2.
Secondary Data
58
Websites like NTPC official site, some other sites are also searched to
find data.
59
Data collection was also done with the help of personal observation.
After completion of survey the data was analyzed and conclusion was
drawn.
At the end all information was compiled to complete the project report.
60
DATA ANALYSIS
&
INTERPRETATION
Table No: 1
61
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
strongly Agree
Total
2
1
14
61
22
100
CHART1
Interpretation:
From the above chart and table it is clearly evident that 22% of the
respondents strongly agree that working hours are convenient from them
and 61% agree with that and 14% neither agree nor disagree and 1%
disagree with the working hours and 2% are strongly against working
hours.
Table No: 2
I'm happy with my work place
Mukesh Kumar
1 Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Vishwakarma
4 AgreeMBA (HRD) A.P.S.University
5 strongly Agree
Total
1
3
10
Rewa (M.P.) 55
31
100
62
Chart 2
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that 31% respondents are strongly agree and
55% respondents are agree that they are happy with their work place only
and 10% employees are neutral with their work place & 3% disagree and
1% strongly disagree towards their work place.
Table No: 3
I feel i have too much work to do
1
2
3
4
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
2
10
26
45
63
strongly Agree
Total
17
100
Chart 3
Interpretation:
From the above table it is quite clear that the work load is not
high, 10% of the respondents disagreed with the question I feel I have
too much work and another 2% strongly disagreed, 23% have no idea
towards this question,45% agree and 17% strongly agree with the question.
Table No: 4
Safety measures provided by the company
1
2
3
4
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
3
7
6
58
64
strongly Agree
Total
26
100
CHART 4
Interpretation:
From the above table it is evident that the safety measures
provided by the organizations are good as 26 and 58% of the respondents
agree with that and only 7 & 3% disagreed and 6% neither agreed nor
disagreed.
TABLE NO. 5
My relationship with my supervisor is cordial
1
2
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
2
2
65
3
4
5
6
55
35
100
CHART 5
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that relationship between
employees and their supervisors are cordial because 35% of respondents
strongly agreed to it and 55% agreed to it and only 2 &2 % disagreed and
6% of respondents have neither agreed nor disagreed.
TABLE NO 6
My supervisor is not partial
1
2
3
4
5
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
strongly Agree
Total
2
3
7
56
32
100
66
CHART 6
Interpretation:
From the above table it is evident that the supervisors are not
partial to the employees as 32% strongly agreed and 56% agreed to the
question but 3% disagreed and 2% strongly disagreed and 7% of respondents
have neither agreed nor disagreed.
TABLE NO 7
My supervisor considers my idea too while taking decision
1
2
3
4
5
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
strongly Agree
Total
2
1
8
64
25
100
CHART 7
67
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that 64 and 25% of the
respondents agree that supervisors consider their employees ideas also
and only 1 &2% disagreed and 8% neither agreed nor disagreed.
TABLE NO 8
I'm satisfied with the support from my co-workers
1
2
3
4
5
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
strongly Agree
Total
2
2
7
59
30
100
CHART 8
68
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that relation with co-workers is
quite good as nearly 89% of the respondents agree that they are satisfied
with support from co-workers and only 4% disagreed and 7% have no
answer to this.
TABLE NO 9
People here have concern from one another and tend to help one
another
1
2
3
4
5
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
strongly Agree
Total
0
5
11
66
18
100
CHART 9
69
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that in this organization people
have concern over each other as 18% strongly agreed and 66% agreed
and only 5% disagreed and 11% neither agreed nor disagreed.
TABLE NO 10
I'm satisfied with the refreshment facilities
1
2
3
4
5
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
strongly Agree
Total
8
7
12
57
16
100
70
CHAR10
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that 16% employees are strongly satisfied
with the refreshment facilities offered by the company as 7% of
respondents disagreed and 8% strongly disagreed and 12% neither
agreed nor disagreed and only 57% agreed.
TABLE NO 11
We are provided with the rest and lunch room and they are good
1
2
3
4
5
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
strongly Agree
7
17
34
32
10
71
Total
100
CHART 11
Interpretation:
From the above table it is quite evident that 7% strongly
disagreed and 17% of the respondents disagreed and 34% neither agreed
nor disagreed and only 42% of the respondents are satisfied with the rest
and lunch room provided.
TABLE NO 12
The parking space for our vehicles are satisfactory
1
2
3
4
5
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
strongly Agree
Total
2
6
11
61
20
100
CHART 12
72
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that respondents are not satisfied
with the parking facilities provided by the company as 2% of
respondents strongly disagreed and 6% of respondents disagreed and
only 81% of respondents are satisfied with the parking facilities and 11%
have neither agreed nor disagreed.
Table no 13
I fell I'm paid a fair amount for the work i do
1
2
3
4
5
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
strongly Agree
Total
3
1
12
50
34
100
Chart 13
73
Interpretation:
From the above table it is evident that the respondents are
satisfied with their salary as 50% agree and 34% strongly agree. Only
`1% disagree and 3% strongly disagree, 12% neither agree nor disagree.
Table no 14
I'm satisfied with the chances for my promotion
1
2
3
4
5
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
strongly Agree
Total
3
7
11
43
36
100
Chart 14
74
Interpretation:
From the above table it is quite clear that employees are satisfied
with their chances for promotion as 43% agree and 36% strongly agree.
Only 7% disagree and 3% strongly disagree, 11% neither agree nor
disagree.
Table no 15
I'm satisfied with the allowances provided by the organization
1
2
3
4
5
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
strongly Agree
Total
2
2
8
50
38
100
Chart 15
75
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that the employees are satisfied
with the allowances and other benefits provided by the organization as
50% agree and 38% strongly agree. Only 2% disagree and 2% strongly
disagree, 8% neither agree nor disagree.
TABLE NO 16
I feel my boss motivate me to achieve the organizational goals
1
2
3
4
5
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
strongly Agree
Total
2
1
10
54
33
100
CHART 16
76
Interpretation:
From the above table it is evident that employees boss are
motivating to achieve organizational goals as 54% agree and 33%
strongly agree. 1% disagree this is quite high compared to other factors
and 2% strongly disagree and 10% neither agree nor disagree.
TABLE NO 17
My supervisor motivates me to increase my efficiency at times when i'm not
1
2
3
4
5
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
strongly Agree
Total
2
2
14
57
25
100
CHART 17
77
Interpretation:
From the above table it is evident that employees boss motivates
the employee when he is unproductive and help him to be productive as
57% agree and 25% strongly agree. Only 2% strongly disagree and 2%
disagree, 14% neither agree nor disagree.
.
TABLE NO 18
I feel that my job has little impact on the success of the company
1
2
3
4
5
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
strongly Agree
Total
5
9
8
52
26
100
Chart 18
78
Interpretation:
From the above chart it is clear that 78% respondents are think that they
contribute in the success of a company, 9% respondent disagree from the
statement and 5% respondent strongly disagree and 8% neither agree nor
disagree from the question.
Table no 19
I am happy with hospital facility at NTPC.
1
2
3
4
5
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
strongly Agree
Total
26
19
21
27
7
100
Chart 19
79
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that employees happy with hospital facility
at NTPC as 27% agree and 7%
strongly agree. 19% disagree this is quite high compared to other factors
and 26% strongly disagree and 21% neither agree nor disagree.
Table no 20
I am satisfied with the sports facilities.
1
2
3
4
5
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
strongly Agree
Total
7
7
27
50
9
100
Chart 20
80
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that the employees are satisfied
with the sports facilities provided by the organization as
50% agree and 9% strongly agree. Only 7% disagree and 7% strongly
disagree, 27% neither agree nor disagree
Table no 21
I am satisfied with welfare facilities of NTPC.
1
2
3
4
5
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
strongly Agree
Total
5
5
7
71
12
100
Chart 21
81
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that the employees are satisfied
with the welfare facilities provided by the organization as
71% agree and 12% strongly agree. Only 5% disagree and 5% strongly
disagree, 7% neither agree nor disagree
Table no 22
Overall I'm satisfied with my job
1
2
3
4
5
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
strongly Agree
Total
2
1
6
52
39
100
Chart 22
82
Interpretation:
From the above table it is evident that Overall satisfactions of the
respondents are good as 52% agree and 39% strongly agree. Only 2%
strongly disagree and 1% disagree and 6% neither agree nor disagree.
FINDINGS
From the study, the researcher has come to know that most of the
respondents are satisfied with their job. the management has taken the best
efforts to maintain cordial relationship with the employees. Due to the
working conditions prevailing in this company, job satisfaction of each
respondent seems to be the maximum. From the study, I have come to know
that most of the employees were satisfied with the welfare measures
provided by NTPC. The employees of NTPC get more benefits compare to
other companies.
83
The respondents are satisfied with the environment and nature of work
factors .
The respondents relationship with the superiors and colleagues are
quite good .
The Respondents are not provided with proper welfare facilities.
The communication and motivation of employees by their superiors in
this organization is reasonable.
The Pay and promotion activities in this organization is also good .
The Respondents are overall satisfied with their job
The Parking facilities provided by the organization are good thats
why most respondents agree with this question.
The refreshment facilities are also need to be improved.
84
limited by 100.
85
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS:
Ashwathapa K., Human Resource Management (third edition), Tata Mc
Graw Hill
Publication Company Ltd.
Chhabra. , T. N. Human Resource Management, Dhanpat Rai $Co(P)Ltd.
India, ninth edition.
Web-Site:www.ntpc.co.in
www.google.com
86
ANNEXURE
Questionnaire
Strongl Disagr
Q
NO.
Question
ee
Neither
(2) Agree
Disagr
nor
ee
Disagr
(1)
ee
Agre Strongl
e
y
(4 Agree
(5)
(3)
I am happy with my work place.
1.
Working hours are convenient for me.
2.
3.
the
4.
5.
6.
cordial.
My senior is not partial.
My senior considers my ideas while
7.
taking decision.
Mukesh Kumar Vishwakarma MBA (HRD) A.P.S.University Rewa (M.P.)
87
my coworkers.
People here have concern from one
9.
10.
facility.
We are provided with the rest and lunch
11.
12.
satisfactory.
I feel I am paid a fair amount for the
13.
work I do.
I am satisfied with the chances for my
14.
promotion.
I am satisfied with the allowances
15.
16.
17.
18.
of the company.
I am happy with hospital facility at
19.
20.
NTPC.
I am satisfied with the sports facilities.
I am satisfied with welfare facilities of
21.
NTPC.
Overall I am satisfied with my present
22.
job.
88
Thanking you
89