with the Law in the Manila Youth Reception Center: A Cross Sectional Study
Author: Wuisan, Jessica Febrina
ABSTRACT
This study describes the prevalence of family dysfunction among male children 6 to 18
years old in conflict with the law in the Manila Youth Reception Center (MYRC) through the use
of Family APGAR. Data collection from the 87 subjects selected via non-random convenience
sampling included Family APGAR surveys and corresponding interviews. There were 5
categories taken into account for the demographic profile of the selected subjects. Based on the
family APGAR score, it was found out that majority of the subjects or 54% emerged from highly
functional families, while 38% from moderately dysfunctional families and 8% from highly
dysfunctional families. Majority is aged 15 to 18 years old, a period prone to experimentation in
the social setting and influences that deviate from law and order. Surprisingly, most of the
participants belong to families earning above minimum wage. Majority of them are elementary
graduates. In terms of family types, 51% of the subjects are from nuclear families which are
considered as the most stable and manageable family type, 26% are from extended families, 18%
from single-parent families and 3.5% of the participants live solely with their siblings. Majority
of them stay in MYRC for less than 1-2 years. In contrast to other studies performed on similar
subject groups, this study indicates a high prevalence rate of highly functional families among
juvenile delinquents.
INTRODUCTION
Juvenile delinquency refers to
antisocial or illegal behavior by children or
adolescents. In the Philippine Law, youthful
offenders are defined as those who are 9
years but less than 21 years old at the time
of the commission of the offense. They are
exempted from criminal liability and shall
be committed to the care of his or her father
or mother, or nearest relative or family
friend in the discretion of the court and
subject to its supervision. Moreover, those
who were unable to furnish bail shall be
placed under the Department of Social
Welfares or any local rehabilitation centers
custody from the time of their arrest. Those
rehabilitations are responsible for the
appearances of youthful offenders in court.1
Those children who are rejected by
their parents, who grew up in homes with
considerable conflict, or who are
inadequately supervised are at the greatest
risk of becoming delinquent. The above
statement is because the family is considered
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Male 6-18 years oldSamples with psychotic breaks or
Subjects should have committedmental derangementscriminal offenses against the law Those affected by c
(i.e. traumatized by robbery,
murder, alcohol or sexual abuse)
Acquired Samples
Collection of Data using Family A.P.G.A.R. scoring
Data Analysis
Number of Participant
Age upon entering the MYRC
6 - 10 years old
11 - 14 years old
15 - 18 years old
Family Monthly Income
3
14
70
<8,400 Php
8,400 Php
>8,400 Php
38
8
41
Type of Family
Nuclear Family
Extended Family
Single Parent Family
Siblings Only
Years of Stay in MYRC
<1 2
<3 - 4
<5 6
Table 1 shows the mode of each
category. Ages 15 to 18 years old comprise
most of the subjects in MYRC and majority
of them are elementary graduates. Most of
them have nuclear families and have an
income range of more than 8400 in a month.
Majority of them stay in MYRC for less
than 1-2 years.
The distribution of
participants classified according to Monthly
Income of the Family. According to National
Statistics Board (2006), a Filipino family of
five who resides in Manila should get an
average income of Php 8300 to be able to
sustain the family needs.
Prevalence
Rate
Highly Functional
47
54%
Moderately
Dysfunctional
33
38%
Highly
Dysfunctional
7
8%
36
8
Table 2 shows that majority of
33
subjects
in MYRC have a highly functional
6
4 family with 54% (over half of the
participants) indicating relatively high
45 satisfaction with their home and family
23 lives.
16
3 DISCUSSION
The study indicates the various
demographic
profiles of the subjects
81
participating
in
the survey and the
4
prevalence of family dysfunction within the
2
same participants.
According to the study of Warr, et
al., delinquency escalates rapidly as
individuals enter their teen years and then
declines almost as rapidly as they enter their
late teens and early twenties. In addition, an
empirical evidence study of Mears & Field
suggests that increased exposure to
delinquent peers exerts a unique impact on
the inclination of older youths to engage in
drug offending using marijuana, getting
drunk, selling illegal drugs, and using
prescription drugs. This appears to be true as
the majority of the participants interviewed
were found to have already reached puberty
and ranged from 15-18 years in age. This is
around the time period that children become
more independent from their families and
participate in social functions that are
influenced by parties outside the familial
hierarchy. Since this age period is prone to
experimentation in a social setting,
influences that deviate from law and order
may aid in an increase in prevalence
ofjuvenile delinquency within this age
group.
Considering
the
participants
educational levels, most of the participants
interviewedwere
elementary
undergraduates. A study by Sabates says that
increase in educational attainment is
APPENDIX A
Name:_________________________________________Age:______Birthday:____________
Family Type:____________________________________Monthly Income:_______________
Educational Background:________________________________Yearof Admittance:_______
ALMOST
ALWAYS
A
P
G
A
R
SOME OF
THE TIME
HARDLY
EVER
Age
Sex
Poor
3.
If you do not live with your own family, list the person/s to
whom you turn to for help.
Relationship
Age
Sex
1.
2.
3.
Fairly
Poor
PAMINSANMINSAN
HINDI
HALOS
KASARIA
N
1.
2.
3.
Kung hindi ka nakakahingi ng tulong sa iyong sariling
pamilya, kani-kanino ka humihingi ng tulong?
RELASYON
EDAD KASARIA
N
HINDI
GAANON
G MABUTI
HINDI
MABUTI
1.
2.
3.
Scoring System:
2 points ALMOST ALWAYS
1 point SOME OF THE TIME
0 points HARDLY EVER
These tables were obtained from Disease Prevention and Control in the Family and the
Community. 4th Edition. Department of Preventive and
2009-2010.
APPENDIX C
Tables of Results
Age upon entering
MYRC
6 to
11 to
15 to
10
14
18
Number of
Participants
Total
14
87
<8400
Number of
Participants
Total
70
38
41
87
Educational attainment
Element Elem.
High
HS
Uneducat
ary
graduate
school
graduate ed
Number of
Participants
Total
36
33
87
Type of Family
Nucle Extend Single
Sibling
ar
ed
parent
only
Number of
Participants
Total
45
23
16
87
81
87
47
33
87
APPENDIX D
Sample Size Estimation
Computation for the sample size:
Equation:
N= (Z)2 x P(1-P)
d2
where N= sample size,
Z = Z statistic for a level of confidence,
P = expected prevalence, and
d = precision
N= (1.96)2 x 0.65 (1.0-0.65)
(0.10)2
N= 3.8416 x 0.65 (0.35)
(0.10)2
N = 87 subjects
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1] Juvenile Deliquency, World Youth Report 2003
[2]Annmarie Cano, Ph.D., Douglas J. Scaturo, Ph.D., Robert P. Sprafkin, Ph.D., Larry J.
Lantinga, Ph.D., Barbara H. Fiese, Ph.D., and Frank Brand, M.D.. Family Support, SelfRated Health, and Psychological Distress.v.5(3); 2003. The Primary Care Companion to the
Journal
of
Clinical
Psychiatry.Retrived
on
August
11,
2010
in
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC406377/
[3] Robertson, A.; Baird-Thomas, C.; Stein, J..Child Victimization and Parental Monitoring
as Mediators of Youth Problem Behaviors.
[4] Dr. David H. Chan, MD, CCFP, Dr. Suzanne C. Ho, MPH, Ph. D, Prof. Stuart P.B.
Donnan, FRCS, FFCM. A Survey of Family APGAR in Shatin Private Ownership
Homes.Department of Community Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shatin,
NT.
[5] L. Naing1,2*, T. Winn2, B.N. Rusli1,2. Practical Issues in Calculating the Sample Size
for Prevalence Studies. Department of Community Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences,
Department of Community Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, UniversitiSains Malaysia,
Health Campus, 16150 KubangKerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
[6] Olsen, Chris.,St. George, Dianne M., Cross Sectional Design And Data Analysis.
Retrieved from http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/yes/4297_MODULE_05.pdf
on September 16, 2010
[7] The Family Code of the Philippine Law presidential Decree 603. The Chan Virtual Law.
Retrieved from http://www.chanrobles.com/childandyouthwelfarecodeofthephilippines.htm
on August 11, 2010,
Centre
of
Cameroon.
Retrieved
from