experiences as they are known in everyday life with the various ways in which places and with
the unique & vital components of The Psychology of place as they are expressed in the physical
environment.. He found it much easier to elaborate and find a number of degrees of complexity
in the types of sequential map produced than in the type of spatial can be seen to be measuring
different aspects of these neighbourhoods.
The fourth chapter of the book deals with an overview of the place & cognitive cartography. In
here David emphasizes, one option to clarify the place by suspending whether a place is a
property of our cognitive system. It is argued that place arises at all levels of identity my
place, your place, our place, home, street, community, country. Etc. & these all
places are interconnected and overlapped with one another.
A strategy that he used to explore The cognitive cartography is described under different
emerge in the same place, same person but different stages of experiences.
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PLACE & LIFE BETWEEN BUILDINGS / REVIEW /URBAN SYNTHESIS
To be human is to live in a world that is filled with significant places: To be human is to have &
to know your Place. [Martin Heidegger, 1958, p.19]
The study of the human relationship to place is first cross-cut by distinctions between built
versus natural places, explanatory versus normative stances, and humanistic versus scientific
approaches. Several typographies are then provided as ways to organize some of the
psychological research related to place. Place perception and cognition provide insights into
mental and collective representations of place.
Contributions from the psychology of place teach us that place attachment, place identity
and place familiarity are all necessary for healthy living. Affective or emotional constructs,
such as place attachment and dependence, offer ways to consider the strong bonds people form
with places, which can be significant factors in land management. Place identity research
describes how a person may have a sense of belonging in a place, and how this may vary with
background variations. Also how the mobility increases the sense of place. Being inside is
knowing where you are because, From the outside you just see, but from the inside you
experience the place. The character of a place changes with the time. Therefore time generates
different qualities of the place and it is a part of human experience of a place. When individuals
are uprooted from their places, they experience grief and resource loss and they face major tasks
of relocation. These stressors exacerbate the negative impact on Self fulfilling prophecies.
In my views, I am always looking for answers to the typical questions of life. Why are we here?
Is there space for place? What are our places communicating with us and others? And what are
we communicating to our places? Do places can located in anywhere? Could it be changed
according to the personal limitations ? Does people are always open to experience the change of
the location? What are the ways of development of a sense of place is varied for both children
and adults? Is that identity of place means individuality & destination?
Various interpretations can be given through literal and cultural views for the psychology of
place. But the problem is whether there is any feasibility of integrating the findings from the
psychology of place in current practice or not.
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PLACE & LIFE BETWEEN BUILDINGS / REVIEW /URBAN SYNTHESIS
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PLACE & LIFE BETWEEN BUILDINGS / REVIEW /URBAN SYNTHESIS
Conclusion
Reviewing through these chapters , most definitely these books that all students of architecture
must have a look through, as it takes one through not just the exploration of place making theory
of architecture but also adds a new thinking for the student in designing according to the human
experiences. Because it is a huge challenge to create places according to the various human
experiences. Though it is difficult, if it could do it will be more sustainable & green , because
people will always need place because having a place & identifying with place are integral to
what & who we are as human beings.
I conclude in exploring places and its psychology , entire spectrum of activities in a city and its
cognate concepts, as kaleidoscopic. However reviewing through this, it is difficult to realize or
criticize the definite solution what really supporting for creating the Places. Because those
concepts seems more holistic and Quickly changing from one thing to another.
Reference:
David.Canter, The Psychology of Place, Architectural Press, [1977.]
Ghel. Jan, Life Between Buildings, Danish Architectural Press, [2006]
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PLACE & LIFE BETWEEN BUILDINGS / REVIEW /URBAN SYNTHESIS
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PLACE & LIFE BETWEEN BUILDINGS / REVIEW /URBAN SYNTHESIS