Many issues affect a viewer's impression of what a data set is saying. Examples include the choice of colours, the scale's
minimum and maximum range, the addition of contour lines as well as colours, etc. The objective when plotting
scientific or technical data is to display information with as little bias as possible. Since each data set has different
characteristics it is important to experiment with the visualization in order to determine which image best presents the
essential aspects of the data set.
Here are eight different ways of colouring a contour map of EM-31 apparent conductivity data gathered over a site with
a complicated industrial history. The ground contains all manner of industrial waste, including wood waste, concrete some with rebar, old oil tanks, railways lines, and other debris.
2. Rainbow colour contouring with gray bands. The scale's
1. Plain rainbow contouring, with the scale chosen to
emphasize mid range values. Note that negative values are range is more inclusive for this data set, and the bands help
provide some sense of the spatial behaviour within colour
all one colour
zones. The effect is similar to including contour lines on top
of a colour map.
As an example of considerations to bare in mind, in the first image there is reasonable detail visible between 70m and
100m north, where apparent conductivities are around 25 mS/m. However all the highest apparent conductivities are
red, so details above 100 mS/m are obscured. The second figure shows these features at high values in more detail but
structures around 25 mS/m are harder to discern.
All eight methods of plotting this data set are shown in thumbnail images here, for more direct comparison of the
overall effect of each colouring scheme.