Carrie Neighbors
Defendant [1]/ Pro Se Litigant
1104 Andover
Lawrence, Kansas 66049
(785) 842-2785
Plaintiff,
Defendant 1,
GUY M. NEIGHBORS
Defendant 2,
COMES NOW on this 26th day of April 2010, the Defendant [1], Carrie Neighbors,
acting as a pro se litigant is filing a Motion to Exclude Witnesses, pursuant to FRE § 609
1). The government had made deals with the witnesses to manufacture a case, to include
offering reduction of sentence, reduction of time, not charging witnesses for crimes committed,
2). Pursuant to FRE 408 prevents these witnesses from testifying, due to this coercive
3). Pursuant to United States v. Old bear, 568 F. 3d 814 (l rfh Cir. June 1 rfh 2009)(No. 08-
6095) in which evidence was irrelevant and inadmissible, due to not one witness can testify that
the Defendant [1] had knowledge that the items were stolen, nor can they testify that the person
who sold the items, had notified the Defendant [1] that the property was stolen, in which would
4). Pursuantto Camjieldv. City of Oklahoma City, 248 F.3d 1214,1232-33 (lrfh Cir. 2001)
5 acts was insufficient to establish a habitual pattern, in which was never shown in this case, in
which would only prejudice and show bias in this cause of action.
5). During the interviews the government / or police officers had made deals with the
witnesses to manufacture a case, to include offering reduction of sentence, reduction of time, not
charging witnesses for crimes committed, offered money to manufacture a case, or change
testimony. Whereby the creditability of the witnesses is at question, to tell the truth to reduce
6). Now this brings into question the appearance of prosecutorial misconduct to
manufacture a case.
"The government must act with great care when engaging in the practice of paying witnesses for
more than expenses. A defendant's right to be apprised of the government's compensation
arrangement with the witness and to inquire about it on cross-examination, must be vigorously
protected United States v. Lipford, 203 8.3d 259 (4th Cir. 2000). "
"The bribery statute 18 US. CA. A§201 (c)(2 proscribing giving a thing of value for a witness's
testimony does not prohibit the United States from acting in accordance with long-standing
practice and statutory authority to pay fees, expenses, and rewards to informants even when the
payment is solely for testimony, so long as the payment is not for or because of any corruption of
truth of testimony. "
THEREFORE the Defendant [1], Carrie Neighbors, acting as a pro se litigant is filing a
Carrie Neighbors
Defendant [1J / Pro Se Litigant
1104 Andover
Lawrence, Kansas 66049
(785) 842-2785
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned also hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
document in the above captioned matter was deposited in the United States mail, first class
postage prepaid, addressed to:
Cheryl A Pilate
Melanie Morgan LLC
Defendant [2J counsel of record
142 Cherry
Olathe, Kansas 66061
Marietta Parker
Terra Morehead
U.S. Attorneys
500 State Ave.
Suite 360
Kansas City, KS 66101
Carrie Neighbors
Defendant [1J / Pro Se Liti
1104 Andover
Lawrence, Kansas 66049
(785) 842-2785