methods for low voltage AC motors The scheme established three efficiency classes: EFF1, EFF2 and EFF3, with EFF1 being the highest efficiency class. The scheme specified that efficiency should be measured in accordance with standard EN / IEC 60034-2: 1996. This has now been replaced with a new IEC standard, IEC 60034-2-1, which came into force September 2007; and also will be ratified and published as EN 60034-2-1 at Cenelec level. This new standard introduces new rules concerning the testing methods to be used for determining losses and efficiency. How is motor efficiency measured? The efficiency of a motor is defined as the ratio of output (mechanical) power to input (electrical) power. It can be measured either directly or indirectly. Direct measurement involves calculating the input power on the basis of the voltage and current supplied, and the output power based on the rotational speed and torque. Indirect measurement involves measuring the input power and calculating the output power on the basis of the losses within the motor. Motor losses can be split into five major areas: l copper losses l iron losses l rotor losses l friction and windage losses l stray load losses (SLL) Of these, the first four types of loss can be determined from input power and motor current. Stray load losses (SLL) are much more difficult to determine, and
Information from ABB
Rated output power
Old efficiency testing
EN/IEC 60034-2: 1996
New efficiency testing
IEC 60034-2-1: 2007-09
7,5 kW, 2-pole motor
88,4 %
87,9 %
11 kW, 4-pole motor
90,9 %
90,3 %
160 kW, 4-pole motor
96,0 %
95,4 %
Table 1: Comparison of two measuring systems.
Measuring efficiency for the European classification scheme
Old efficiency testing standard EN/IEC 60034-2: 1996
New efficiency testing standard IEC
60034-3-1: 2007-09
Direct method
Direct method
Indirect method:
Indirect method:
SLL estimated at 0,5 % of input
power at rated load
Winding losses in stator and rotor
determined at 95 oC.
SLL determined from measurement
SLL estimated at 2,5 % - 0,5 % of input
power at rated load
Eh star - alternative indirect method with
mathematical salculation of SLL
Winding losses in stator and rotor determined
at [25 oC + temperature rise measured]
Table. 2: Methods for measuring efficiency.
so manufacturers are permitted to use
an estimate based on the rated power of the motor. How do the efficiency figures compare under the old and new standards? Table 1 shows examples of how the efficiency figures compare under the old and new standards for three different sizes of motor. March 2008 - Vector - Page 37
The rated current stamped on the motor
rating plate will be slightly higher to comply with the new efficiency testing standard. Note also that values by different motor manufacturers may not be comparable. How has the new efficiency testing standard changed measurement methods? Measuring efficiency for the European classification scheme. The new method
based on the real measured SLL has
been used in North America and Canada, where it is required under the IEEE 112-B (2004) and CSA 390 standards. It is likely to be much more widely used under the new standard. The indirect measurement was widely used by manufacturers under the old standard. However, the rules concerning the estimation of SLL in the indirect measurement method have been made much tighter under the new standard and the new values are now taking into account the actual measured losses. The new standard also introduces new indirect measurement method options:
IEC
International Electrotechnical Commission
IEEE
Institute of Electrical Electronics Engineers
CSA
Canadian Standards Association
EN
European Norm
SLL
Stray Load Losses
Table. 3: Key to abbreviations
SLL determined from measurement
l SLL estimated at 2,5% - 0,5% of input power at rated load. l Eh star: the losses are measured indirectly, with SLL being calculated by mathematical means. l
How can motor users identify
which measuring method has been used? Under the new standard, manufacturers can select which of the measuring methods they apply. The motor documentation must state which method was used. Please note that efficiency values provided by different motor manufacturers are comparable only if the same measuring method has been used. Different approaches Under the new efficiency testing standard (IEC 60034-2-1: 2007-09), ABB: l intends to use the new indirect method with SLL determined from measurement. l has already acquired the equipment needed to perform the testing. l is presently retesting motors so that the new efficiency values can be included in the next edition motor catalogues. At the same time the company is closely following the preparation of a further new IEC standard. IEC 60034-30 is expected to enter into force in 2009, and will introduce a new international efficiency classification system (classes IE1, IE2, IE3). Contact Anton Henning, ABB, Tel 011 617-2179, anton.henning@za.abb.com D
Journal of Applied Polymer Science Volume 103 Issue 5 2007 (Doi 10.1002/app.25468) Sergul Acikalin Gulmus Ulku Yilmazer - Effect of The Surface Roughness and Construction Material On Wall Slip in