DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12166
www.bjog.org
pregnancy ( 24 weeks).
Method Women were recruited from six public hospitals. Data
Please cite this paper as: McDonald E, Brown S. Does method of birth make a difference to when women resume sex after childbirth?. BJOG 2013;120:823
830.
Introduction
The resumption of sex after childbirth is a concern for
many women and their partners, and a recommended discussion topic in postnatal care.13 Yet, obstetric and midwifery clinical textbooks generally contain minimal
information about the impact of pregnancy and childbirth
on resumption of sex. The third edition of a classic obstetric text book published in 1997 suggests that coitus is often
resumed within 23 weeks with an intact perineum, and at
48 weeks or later with an episiotomy or perineal repair.4
Myles Textbook for Midwives states that women should be
pain free and have been able to resume intercourse without
pain by 6 weeks postpartum, but acknowledges that this is
sometimes not the case.5 The author of a recent compendium of obstetric evidence-based guidelines concludes that
there is insufficient evidence regarding the resumption of
sex after childbirth to inform the advice that health professionals give to women about this issue.6 This is largely
because of the limitations of existing studies, most of which
are cross-sectional, and therefore subject to recall bias.7
Few studies distinguish between nulliparous and multiparous women, and most lack sufficient sample size to assess
associations with method of birth and degree of perineal
trauma.
This paper draws on data collected in the Maternal
Health Study, a large multicentre prospective nulliparous
cohort study that was designed to assess the natural history
of maternal morbidity during pregnancy and after a first
birth. Primary outcomes included urinary incontinence,
faecal incontinence, persisting perineal pain and other sexual health problems. Data were collected via self-administered questionnaires in early pregnancy, and at 3, 6 and
12 months postpartum, and included questions regarding
2013 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2013 RCOG
823
McDonald Brown
Methods
Sample
Women were recruited to the study between 1 April 2003
and 31 December 2005 from six metropolitan public hospitals in Melbourne, Australia with a mix of high-risk and
low-risk perinatal services. Eligibility criteria were:
18 years, nulliparous (i.e. no previous live births or pregnancies ending in a stillbirth), sufficient English language
fluency to complete self-administered questionnaires and
telephone interviews, and estimated gestation of
24 weeks at enrolment (according to ultrasound or date
of last menstrual period). Following their booking visit, all
eligible women were mailed an invitation package by participating hospitals. Study staff also made regular visits to
antenatal booking clinics at two participating hospitals, and
to childbirth education classes at one of the other study
sites, to distribute information packages to women eligible
to take part in the study. The invitation package included
the baseline questionnaire, an information sheet about the
study, a consent form and a separate sheet for providing
contact details. The invitation was followed up by a single
mailed reminder postcard. We were prevented from following up non-responders by telephone by Australian privacy
legislation and the conditions of our ethics approval.
Women were invited to return the consent papers, contact
information and completed questionnaire in a reply-paid
envelope. This paper draws on data collected in the baseline
questionnaire and follow-up questionnaires completed at 3,
6 and 12 months postpartum, and on data abstracted from
hospital medical records for women giving written consent.
824
Analysis
Data were analysed using STATA version 12.14 The proportion (and cumulative proportion) of women resuming sexual activity and vaginal sex at given intervals after
childbirth were calculated based on the proportions of
women reporting resumption of sex divided by the total
2013 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2013 RCOG
Results
Sample
A total of 1537 women enrolled in the study. Thirty
women were excluded after enrolment due to miscarriage
(12), insufficient fluency in English (11), multiparity (5),
or termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality (2), leaving a final sample of 1507 women. We are unable to determine a precise response fraction. Over 6000 information
packages were distributed, but some were mailed to women
who had already received a questionnaire and information
package at a booking visit. It is also likely that some were
incorrectly addressed or sent to women who were ineligible
(e.g. multiparous). Based on the assumption that 8090%
of invitations were sent to eligible women with a correct
mailing address, we conservatively estimate the overall
response fraction to be in the range of 2831%.
The mean gestation of study participants at the time of
enrolment was 15.0 weeks (SD 3.1, range 624 weeks).
Social and reproductive characteristics of participants were
compared with routinely collected data for women giving
birth at Victorian public hospitals in the study period.
Compared with all women 18 years giving birth to their
first child at public hospitals in Victoria during the 30month period of recruitment, study participants were representative in relation to method of birth and infant birthweight, but under-represented young women (1824 years,
15.5% versus 29.9%) and women born overseas from a
non-English-speaking background (16.2% versus 21.0%).
Further information regarding sociodemographic and
reproductive characteristics of the sample and representativeness of study participants compared with other women
giving birth at study hospitals and other Victorian public
hospitals in the same time period is available in a previous
paper.15
4 weeks
56 weeks
78 weeks
912 weeks
4 months (1317 weeks)
5 months (1821 weeks)
6 months (2226 weeks)
79 months (2739 weeks)
1012 months
(4052 weeks)
Not resumed by 12
months
Sexual activity
n (%)
[cumulative%]
365 (28.0)
327 (25.0)
266 (20.4)
170 (13.0)
74 (5.7)
21 (1.6)
23 (1.8)
22 (1.7)
8 (0.6)
[28.0]
[53.0]
[73.4]
[86.4]
[92.1]
[93.7]
[95.5]
[97.2]
[97.8]
29 (2.2) [100.0]
Vaginal sex
n (%)
[cumulative%]
199 (15.2)
342 (26.2)
310 (23.8)
169 (13.0)
156 (12.0)
36 (2.8)
11 (0.8)
27 (2.0)
11 (0.8)
[15.2]
[41.4]
[65.2]
[78.2]
[90.2]
[93.0]
[93.8]
[95.8]
[96.6]
44 (3.4) [100.0]
2013 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2013 RCOG
825
McDonald Brown
Table 2. Resumption of vaginal sex at or by 6 weeks postpartum and 3 months postpartum by background, obstetric and postnatal variables
Total*
OR
95% CI
OR
95% CI
39.9
62.8
38.0
38.5
1.0 (ref)
0.39
1.08
1.06
0.30.6
0.81.4
0.81.5
305
131
404
180
81.1
88.5
76.4
71.4
1.0 (ref)
0.56
1.33
1.72
0.31.0
1.01.8
1.22.5
42.1
26.8
1.0 (ref)
1.99
1.13.6
991
28
79.4
50.0
1.0 (ref)
3.86
2.26.6
38.3
44.2
42.0
50.5
1.0 (ref)
0.78
0.86
0.61
0.61.0
0.61.2
0.40.9
471
264
190
90
75.7
78.3
79.8
89.1
1.0 (ref)
0.86
0.79
0.38
0.61.2
0.61.1
0.20.7
41.5
32.1
40.7
47.7
43.7
1.0 (ref)
1.50
1.03
0.78
0.91
1.02.2
0.71.5
0.51.1
0.71.2
496
112
103
96
213
78.2
80.0
73.6
75.0
81.0
1.0 (ref)
0.90
1.29
1.20
0.84
0.61.4
0.92.0
0.81.9
0.61.2
50.1
51.5
35.1
32.1
1.0 (ref)
0.95
1.86
2.13
0.61.6
1.42.4
1.62.9
437
57
314
211
81.1
83.8
78.1
72.0
1.0 (ref)
0.83
1.20
1.67
0.41.6
0.91.7
1.22.3
52.7
39.6
1.0 (ref)
1.71
na
na
1.22.4
na
na
na
na
45.8
39.3
1.0 (ref)
1.31
1.01.7
na
na
na
41.7
41.7
1.0 (ref)
1.00
826
0.71.4
na
221
749
83.4
77.1
1.0 (ref)
1.26
0.91.7
354
658
81.9
76.4
1.0 (ref)
1.40
1.11.9
955
64
78.9
71.9
1.0 (ref)
1.46
0.92.4
843
175
77.9
81.0
1.0 (ref)
0.83
0.61.2
2013 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2013 RCOG
Total
n
3
months
6
months
12
months
Method of birth
and perineal
trauma
Total
86.6
82.8
78.0
62.6
97.9
93.8
93.5
93.4
98.6
96.9
95.6
96.7
100.0
100.0
87.5
77.7
100.0
100.0
95.8
96.4
100.0
100.0
100.0
97.3
72.7
100.0
71.8
73.9
90.9
100.0
92.3
90.9
90.9
100.0
92.3
95.5
75.0
88.3
89.1
81.3
94.5
96.9
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Adjusted
OR*
95% CI
1.0 (ref)
1.39
3.18
3.43
0.72.6
2.14.9
1.96.2
4.60
3.46
1.613.6
2.06.0
2.38
2.86
1.15.2
1.65.2
1.71
1.02.9
1.99
1.33.1
1.0 (ref)
0.44
1.13
1.16
0.30.7
0.81.5
0.81.7
ne**
ne
1.0 (ref)
0.94
0.98
0.82
0.71.3
0.71.4
0.51.3
1.0 (ref)
1.25
1.12.3
1.0 (ref)
1.25
1.01.6
ated with timing of resumption of vaginal sex in univariable analyses). The site of recruitment was included in the
model to account for potential cluster effects. Table 4
shows the adjusted odds ratios within strata compared with
the reference category of spontaneous vaginal birth with an
intact perineum. The results confirm effects associated with
2013 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2013 RCOG
827
McDonald Brown
Discussion
Main findings
The most important finding of this study is the wide
time interval over which women resume vaginal sex after
a first birth. The common assumption that most women
will resume sex by 6 weeks postpartum is out of step
with the choices made by many women and their partners. Many factors will influence these decisions. It is
possible that some couples delay resumption of sex until
after the 6-week check-up on the grounds of waiting to
check that everything is back to normal. This may
explain the relatively large number of women who
resumed vaginal sex around 78 weeks postpartum. The
study findings provide evidence that both method of birth
and degree of perineal trauma also play a role, with caesarean birth or operative vaginal birth more likely to be
associated with a delay in resumption of vaginal sex compared with vaginal birth with an intact perineum. In
modern obstetric practice, only a small proportion of
women having a first baby will achieve a vaginal birth
with no attendant perineal trauma. In this large multicentre study, the proportion was around 10%. Hence, for the
vast majority of women and their partners, it is reasonable to anticipate a delay in resuming vaginal sex related
to the events of labour and birth.
Young women (<25 years) tended to resume vaginal sex
earlier than older women. Women who were single,
divorced or separated were more likely to resume sex later
than women living with a partner. Apart from maternal
age and relationship status, sociodemographic characteristics appeared to play little role in womens decisions about
828
timing of resumption of vaginal sex. Other factors associated at a univariable level with a delay in resumption of
vaginal sex were breastfeeding and extreme tiredness.
Exhaustion is a common experience in the first year after
childbirth,1619 and was frequently commented on by study
participants as a factor influencing their sex lives in the
year after the birth (data not shown). Radestadt et al.20
have previously reported an association between breastfeeding and delayed resumption of sex citing hormonal changes
and lack of vaginal lubrication as potentially contributing
to this finding. It is possible that tiredness contributes to
the association with breastfeeding, but our results showing
an association between breastfeeding and timing of
resumption of sex, adjusting for a range of other factors
including tiredness, suggest that lactation may make an
independent contribution to the timing of resumption of
vaginal sex after childbirth.
Women who scored 13 on the EPDS at 3 months
postpartum did not appear to be any more likely to delay
resumption of vaginal sex than women scoring below this
cut-off, although the results bordering on statistical significance and modest effect size would suggest a weak association. Other studies have shown associations between
maternal depression and sexual health problems21 and
delay in resumption of sex.22
2013 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2013 RCOG
Contribution to authorship
EM conducted the analyses and wrote the paper. SB wrote
the study protocol, took primary responsibility for the
design and conduct of the study, contributed to analysis
and interpretation of data and contributed to writing the
paper. Both authors have approved the final draft of the
paper for publication.
Interpretation
The timing of resumption of vaginal sex is only one dimension of sexuality after childbirth, but it is very common for
women to want information about when sexual activity may
be safely and comfortably resumed, and what to expect in
relation to the impact of childbirth on their sexual relationship. Having more reliable information to guide clinical
practice is important for a number of reasons. First and foremost, it can help dispel myths about what is normal (or
abnormal) in the postnatal period. The fact that most
women had not resumed vaginal sex by 6 weeks postpartum
means that it is normal for couples to delay resumption of
sex until after this time. This is useful information for couples to know before their baby is born, and may help to
reduce the feelings of anxiety and guilt about not resuming
sexual activity sooner.25 Second, having more reliable evidence enables clinicians to tailor information to womens
circumstances. It may help women who have had a caesarean
section, operative vaginal birth and/or an episiotomy or perineal tear to be counselled to anticipate ways in which this
might affect their sexual relationship.
Conclusion
The Maternal Health Study is the first large multicentre,
prospective pregnancy cohort study to provide robust evidence regarding the association of method of birth, perineal trauma and the timing of resumption of vaginal sex
after a first birth. The findings show that most women do
not resume vaginal sex until later than 6 weeks postpartum, and that women having an operative vaginal birth,
caesarean section and/or perineal tear or episiotomy are
likely to delay resumption of vaginal sex for longer. The
study provides important new evidence to guide information given to women and their partners about what to
expect after childbirth.
Disclosure of interests
None disclosed.
Funding
This research was supported by project grants from the
Australian National Health and Medical Research Council
(ID191222 and ID433006 Melbourne, Australia); a VicHealth Public Health Research Fellowship (200206) and a
National Health and Medical Research Council Career
Development Fellowship (ID491205, 200811) awarded to
SB; and the Victorian Governments Operational Infrastructure Support Programme.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to members of the Maternal Health Study
research team who have contributed to data collection and
coding (Maggie Flood, Deirdre Gartland, Ann Krastev,
Renee Paxton, Susan Perlen, Martine Spaull, Hannah
Woolhouse), and to Deirdre Gartland and Hannah Woolhouse for reviewing and commenting on the manuscript
before submission. &
References
1 Olsson A, Lundqvist M, Faxelid E, Nissen E. Womens thoughts
about sexual life after childbirth: focus group discussions with
women after childbirth. Scand J Caring Sci 2005;19:3817.
2 Olsson A, Robertson E, Falk K, Nissen E. Assessing womens sexual
life after childbirth: the role of the postnatal check. Midwifery
2011;27:195202.
3 Bick D, MacArthur C, Knowles H, Winter H. Postnatal Care:
Evidence and Guidelines for Management. Edinburgh: Churchill
Livingstone, 2002.
4 Beischer NA, Mackay EV, Colditz PB. Obstetrics and the Newborn:
An Illustrated Textbook. London: Saunders, 1979 (3rd ed.).
5 Fraser DM, Cooper MA. Myles Textbook for Midwives. Edinburgh:
Churchill Livingstone, 2009.
6 Berghella V. Obstetric Evidence Based Guidelines: Informa
Healthcare. New York: Informa Healthcare, 2011 (2nd ed.).
7 Leeman LM, Rogers RG. Sex after childbirth: postpartum sexual
function. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:64755.
8 Barrett G, Pendry E, Peacock J, Victor C, Thakar R, Manyonda I.
Womens sexual health after childbirth. BJOG 2000;107:186
95.
2013 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2013 RCOG
829
McDonald Brown
830
2013 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2013 RCOG